Patent Grant
8333918
The present invention is related to a method for forming nonwoven webs, and to an apparatus for forming such webs.
Many of the medical care garments and products, protective wear garments, mortuary and veterinary products, and personal care products in use today are partially or wholly constructed of nonwoven web materials. Examples of such products include, but are not limited to, consumer and professional medical and health care products such as surgical drapes, gowns and bandages, protective workwear garments such as coveralls and lab coats, and infant, child and adult personal care absorbent products such as diapers, training pants, swimwear, incontinence garments and pads, sanitary napkins, wipes and the like. For these applications nonwoven fibrous webs provide tactile, comfort and aesthetic properties which can approach those of traditional woven or knitted cloth materials. Nonwoven web materials are also widely utilized as filtration media for both liquid and gas or air filtration applications since they can be formed into a filter mesh of fine fibers having a low average pore size suitable for trapping particulate matter while still having a low pressure drop across the mesh.
Nonwoven web materials have a physical structure of individual fibers or filaments which are interlaid in a generally random manner rather than in a regular, identifiable manner as in knitted or woven fabrics. The fibers may be continuous or discontinuous, and are frequently produced from thermoplastic polymer or copolymer resins from the general classes of polyolefins, polyesters and polyamides, as well as numerous other polymers. Blends of polymers or conjugate multicomponent fibers may also be employed. Nonwoven fibrous webs formed by melt extrusion processes such as spunbonding and meltblowing, as well as those formed by dry-laying processes such as carding or air-laying of staple fibers are well known in the art. In addition, nonwoven fabrics may be used in composite materials in conjunction with other nonwoven layers as in spunbond/meltblown (SM) and spunbond/meltblown/spunbond (SMS) laminate fabrics, and may also be used in combination with thermoplastic films. Nonwoven fabrics may also be bonded, embossed, treated and/or colored to impart various desired properties, depending on end-use application.
Melt extrusion processes for spinning continuous filament yarns and continuous filaments or fibers such as spunbond fibers, and for spinning microfibers such as meltblown fibers, and the associated processes for forming nonwoven webs or fabrics therefrom, are well known in the art. Typically, fibrous nonwoven webs such as spunbond nonwoven webs are formed with the fiber extrusion apparatus, such as a spinneret, and fiber attenuating apparatus, such as a fiber drawing unit (FDU), oriented in the cross-machine direction or “CD”. That is, the apparatus is oriented at a 90 degree angle to the direction of web production. The direction of nonwoven web production is known as the “machine direction” or “MD”. Although the fibers are laid on the forming surface in a generally random manner, still, because the fibers exit the CD oriented spinneret and FDU and are deposited on the MD-moving forming surface, the resulting nonwoven webs have an overall average fiber directionality wherein more of the fibers are oriented in the MD than in the CD. It is widely recognized that such properties as material tensile strength, extensibility and material barrier, for example, are a function of the material uniformity and the directionality of the fibers or filaments in the web. Various attempts have been made to distribute the fibers or filaments within the web in a controlled manner, attempts including the use of electrostatics to impart a charge to the fibers or filaments, the use of spreader devices to direct the fibers or filaments in a desired orientation, the use of mechanical deflection means for the same purpose, and reorienting the fiber forming means. However, it remains desired to achieve still further capability to gain this control in a way that is consistent with costs dictated by the disposable applications for many of these nonwovens.
The present invention provides a method of making a nonwoven web including the steps of providing a plurality of fibers, subjecting the fibers to a pneumatic attenuation force in a drawing slot, the attenuation force imparting a velocity to the fibers, reducing the velocity of the fibers in a diffusion chamber, the diffusion chamber being formed substantially between opposed diverging sidewalls, subjecting the fibers to an applied electrostatic charge before the fibers enter the diffusion chamber, wherein the electrostatic charge is applied by two or more oppositely directed electrostatic charging units, and then collecting the fibers into a web on a moving forming surface. One electrostatic charging unit may be located substantially closer to the diffusion chamber than at least one other electrostatic charging unit.
In another embodiment, a method is provided comprising the steps of providing a plurality of fibers, subjecting the fibers to a pneumatic attenuation force in a drawing slot, the attenuation force imparting a velocity to the fibers, reducing the velocity of the fibers in a diffusion chamber, the diffusion chamber being formed substantially between opposed diverging sidewalls, subjecting the fibers to an applied electrostatic charge while the fibers are in the diffusion chamber, the electrostatic charge being applied by at least one electrostatic charging unit located upon a diverging sidewall, and then collecting the fibers into a web on a moving forming surface. The electrostatic charge may applied by two or more oppositely directed electrostatic charging units, where at least one electrostatic charging unit is located upon each of the diverging sidewalls, and at least one electrostatic charging unit may be located substantially closer to the drawing slot than at least one other electrostatic charging unit.
In another embodiment, a method is provided comprising the steps of providing a plurality of fibers, subjecting the fibers to a pneumatic attenuation force in a drawing slot formed between opposed drawing slot sidewalls, the attenuation force imparting a velocity to the fibers, subjecting the fibers to an applied electrostatic charge, the electrostatic charge applied by an electrostatic charging unit located on one of the drawing slot sidewalls, reducing the velocity of the fibers in a diffusion chamber, the diffusion chamber being formed substantially between opposed diverging sidewalls, and then collecting the fibers into a web on a moving forming surface, and where the pneumatic attenuation force is provided by attenuation air entering the drawing slot only from the drawing slot sidewall opposing the drawing slot sidewall upon which the electrostatic charging unit is located.
The invention further provides an apparatus for forming a nonwoven web comprising a source of fibers, a fiber drawing slot formed between opposed slot sidewalls, a diffusion chamber formed substantially between opposed diverging sidewalls, the diffusion chamber located below the drawing slot, two or more oppositely directed electrostatic charging units located above the diffusion chamber, and a forming surface for collecting the fibers as a nonwoven web. At least one of the electrostatic charging units may be located substantially closer to the diffusion chamber than at least one other electrostatic charging unit.
In another embodiment, the apparatus comprises a source of fibers, a fiber drawing slot formed between opposed slot sidewalls, a diffusion chamber formed substantially between opposed diverging sidewalls, the diffusion chamber located below the drawing slot, at least one electrostatic charging unit located upon one of the diverging sidewalls of the diffusion chamber, and a forming surface for collecting the fibers as a nonwoven web. The apparatus may have two or more oppositely directed electrostatic charging units, where at least one electrostatic charging unit is located upon each of the diverging sidewalls, and at least one electrostatic charging unit may be located substantially closer to the drawing slot than at least one other electrostatic charging unit.
In embodiments of any of the above, the opposed diverging sidewalls may desirably be unvented, the pneumatic attenuation force may desirably be provided by perturbed attenuation air, and one or both of the opposed diverging sidewalls may desirably have at least one vortex generator.
As used herein and in the claims, the term “comprising” is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional unrecited elements, compositional components, or method steps.
As used herein the term “polymer” generally includes but is not limited to, homopolymers, copolymers, such as for example, block, graft, random and alternating copolymers, terpolymers, etc. and blends and modifications thereof. Furthermore, unless otherwise specifically limited, the term “polymer” shall include all possible geometrical configurations of the chemical formula structure. These configurations include, but are not limited to isotactic, syndiotactic and random symmetries.
As used herein the term “fibers” refers to both staple length fibers and continuous fibers, unless otherwise indicated.
As used herein the term “monocomponent” fiber refers to a fiber formed from one or more extruders using only one polymer. This is not meant to exclude fibers formed from one polymer to which small amounts of additives have been added for color, anti-static properties, lubrication, hydrophilicity, etc. These additives, e.g. titanium dioxide for color, are generally present in an amount less than 5 weight percent and more typically about 2 weight percent.
As used herein the term “multicomponent fibers” refers to fibers which have been formed from at least two component polymers, or the same polymer with different properties or additives, extruded from separate extruders but spun together to form one fiber. Multicomponent fibers are also sometimes referred to as conjugate fibers or bicomponent fibers. The polymers are arranged in substantially constantly positioned distinct zones across the cross-section of the multicomponent fibers and extend continuously along the length of the multicomponent fibers. The configuration of such a multicomponent fiber may be, for example, a sheath/core arrangement wherein one polymer is surrounded by another, or may be a side by side arrangement, an “islands-in-the-sea” arrangement, or arranged as pie-wedge shapes or as stripes on a round, oval, or rectangular cross-section fiber. Multicomponent fibers are taught in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,820 to Kaneko et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,336,552 to Strack et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,382,400 to Pike et al. For two component fibers, the polymers may be present in ratios of 75/25, 50/50, 25/75 or any other desired ratios.
As used herein the term “biconstituent fiber” or “multiconstituent fiber” refers to a fiber formed from at least two polymers, or the same polymer with different properties or additives, extruded from the same extruder as a blend and wherein the polymers are not arranged in substantially constantly positioned distinct zones across the cross-section of the multicomponent fibers. Fibers of this general type are discussed in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,108,827 to Gessner.
As used herein the term “nonwoven web” or “nonwoven material” means a web having a structure of individual fibers or filaments which are interlaid, but not in an identifiable manner as in a knitted or woven fabric. Nonwoven webs have been formed from many processes such as for example, meltblowing processes, spunbonding processes, air-laying processes and carded web processes. The basis weight of nonwoven fabrics is usually expressed in grams per square meter (gsm) or ounces of material per square yard (osy) and the fiber diameters useful are usually expressed in microns. (Note that to convert from osy to gsm, multiply osy by 33.91).
The term “spunbond” or “spunbond nonwoven web” refers to a nonwoven fiber or filament material of small diameter fibers that are formed by extruding molten thermoplastic polymer as fibers from a plurality of capillaries of a spinneret. The extruded fibers are cooled while being drawn by an eductive or other well known drawing mechanism. The drawn fibers are deposited or laid onto a forming surface in a generally random manner to form a loosely entangled fiber web, and then the laid fiber web is subjected to a bonding process to impart physical integrity and dimensional stability. The production of spunbond fabrics is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,340,563 to Appel et al., U.S. Pat. No. 3,692,618 to Dorschner et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 3,802,817 to Matsuki et al. Typically, spunbond fibers or filaments have a weight-per-unit-length in excess of about 1 denier and up to about 6 denier or higher, although both finer and heavier spunbond fibers can be produced. In terms of fiber diameter, spunbond fibers often have an average diameter of larger than 7 microns, and more particularly between about 10 and about 25 microns, and up to about 30 microns or more.
As used herein the term “meltblown fibers” means fibers or microfibers formed by extruding a molten thermoplastic material through a plurality of fine, usually circular, die capillaries as molten threads or fibers into converging high velocity gas (e.g. air) streams which attenuate the fibers of molten thermoplastic material to reduce their diameter. Thereafter, the meltblown fibers are carried by the high velocity gas stream and are deposited on a collecting surface to form a web of randomly dispersed meltblown fibers. Such a process is disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,241 to Buntin. Meltblown fibers may be continuous or discontinuous, are often smaller than 10 microns in average diameter and are frequently smaller than 7 or even 5 microns in average diameter, and are generally tacky when deposited onto a collecting surface.
As used herein, “thermal point bonding” involves passing a fabric or web of fibers or other sheet layer material to be bonded between a heated calender roll and an anvil roll. The calender roll is usually, though not always, patterned on its surface in some way so that the entire fabric is not bonded across its entire surface. As a result, various patterns for calender rolls have been developed for functional as well as aesthetic reasons. One example of a pattern has points and is the Hansen Pennings or “H&P” pattern with about a 30% bond area with about 200 bonds/square inch as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 3,855,046 to Hansen and Pennings. The H&P pattern has square point or pin bonding areas wherein each pin has a side dimension of 0.038 inches (0.965 mm), a spacing of 0.070 inches (1.778 mm) between pins, and a depth of bonding of 0.023 inches (0.584 mm). The resulting pattern has a bonded area of about 29.5%. Another typical point bonding pattern is the expanded Hansen and Pennings or “EHP” bond pattern which produces a 15% bond area with a square pin having a side dimension of 0.037 inches (0.94 mm), a pin spacing of 0.097 inches (2.464 mm) and a depth of 0.039 inches (0.991 mm). Other common patterns include a high density diamond or “HDD pattern”, which comprises point bonds having about 460 pins per square inch (about 71 pins per square centimeter) for a bond area of about 15% to about 23% and a wire weave pattern looking as the name suggests, e.g. like a window screen. Typically, the percent bonding area varies from around 10% to around 30% of the area of the fabric laminate web. Thermal point bonding imparts integrity to individual layers by bonding fibers within the layer and/or for laminates of multiple layers, point bonding holds the layers together to form a cohesive laminate.
The present invention provides a method for forming fibrous nonwoven webs of high uniformity, and provides an apparatus for forming such nonwoven webs. The invention will be more fully described with reference to the Figures. Turning to
The process line 10 includes an extruder 30 for melting and extruding polymer fed into the extruder 30 from polymer hopper 20. The polymer is fed from extruder 30 through polymer conduit 40 to a source of fibers, such as spinneret 50. Spinneret 50 forms fibers 60 which may be monocomponent or multicomponent fibers. Where multicomponent fibers are desired, a second extruder fed from a second polymer hopper would be used. Spinnerets for extruding multicomponent continuous fibers are well known to those of ordinary skill in the art and thus are not described here in detail; however, an exemplary spin pack for producing multicomponent fibers is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,989,004 to Cook, the entire contents of which are herein incorporated by reference.
Polymers suitable for the present invention include the known polymers suitable for production of nonwoven webs and materials such as for example polyolefins, polyesters, polyamides, polycarbonates and copolymers and blends thereof. Suitable polyolefins include polyethylene, e.g., high density polyethylene, medium density polyethylene, low density polyethylene and linear low density polyethylene; polypropylene, e.g., isotactic polypropylene, syndiotactic polypropylene, blends of isotactic polypropylene and atactic polypropylene; polybutylene, e.g., poly(1-butene) and poly(2-butene); polypentene, e.g., poly(1-pentene) and poly(2-pentene); poly(3-methyl-1-pentene); poly(4-methyl-1-pentene); and copolymers and blends thereof. Suitable copolymers include random and block copolymers prepared from two or more different unsaturated olefin monomers, such as ethylene/propylene and ethylene/butylene copolymers. Suitable polyamides include nylon 6, nylon 6/6, nylon 4/6, nylon 11, nylon 12, nylon 6/10, nylon 6/12, nylon 12/12, copolymers of caprolactam and alkylene oxide diamine, and the like, as well as blends and copolymers thereof. Suitable polyesters include poly lactide and poly lactic acid polymers as well as polyethylene terephthalate, poly-butylene terephthalate, polytetramethylene terephthalate, polycyclohexylene-1,4-dimethylene terephthalate, and isophthalate copolymers thereof, as well as blends thereof.
The spinneret 50 has openings or capillaries arranged in one or more rows. The spinneret openings form a downwardly extending “curtain” or “bundle” of fibers 60 when polymer is extruded through the spinneret. The exemplary process line 10 in
A fiber drawing unit or aspirator 70 to receive the quenched curtain or bundle of fibers is positioned below the spinneret 50 and the quench blower 64. Fiber drawing units or aspirators for use in melt spinning polymers are well known in the art. Suitable fiber drawing units include, for example, linear fiber aspirators of the types shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,802,817 to Matsuki et al. and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,340,563 and 4,405,297 to Appel et al., all herein incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Generally described, the fiber drawing unit 70 includes an elongate vertical passage or drawing slot which serves as an attenuation chamber, through which the fibers are drawn by aspirating air entering generally from both of the sides of the passage or drawing slot and flowing downwardly through the passage. The attenuation chamber or fiber drawing slot is formed by opposed plates or sidewalls, designated 72 and 74 in
As the fibers exit the fiber drawing unit 70 they are passed through a diffuser to reduce the fiber velocity prior to laying the fibers down into a nonwoven web. Shown positioned below the bottom exit of fiber drawing unit 70 is exemplary diffusion chamber 80. Suitable diffusion chambers or diffusers are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,349 to Geus et al., incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. As described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,349 it is desirable for the diffuser to be mounted slightly below the exit of the fiber drawing unit to allow for ambient air to be drawn into the diffusion chamber from the sides. As shown in
As the pneumatic jet expands in the diffusion chamber 80 it decreases in velocity, and the fiber velocity also decreases, which allows for the fiber bundle to spread out somewhat in the machine direction. That is, as the fiber bundle travels downward through the diffusion chamber, it begins to take on a machine direction dimension which is somewhat larger than it had while between opposed sidewalls 72 and 74 of the attenuation chamber. However, in order to provide for high uniformity of material formation on fiber laydown, it is highly desirable for the machine direction fiber bundle spread to be larger than the bundle spread generated by the diffusion chamber alone. For example, it would be desirable for the fiber bundle to spread out in the machine direction to at least 50 percent of the machine direction dimension of the diffusion chamber 80 at its bottom, as the fibers exit the diffusion chamber 80. It would be more desirable to have the bundle spread be even larger, such as for example to have the bundle spread be 70 percent of the machine direction dimension of the diffusion chamber 80 at its bottom, or even 90 percent, or more.
In order to increase the machine direction fiber bundle spread, one or more electrostatic charging devices as are known in the art may be beneficially employed to impart an electrostatic charge to the fibers of the fiber bundle either as they travel through the fiber drawing slot of fiber drawing unit 70 or as they travel through diffusion chamber 80, or both. Exemplary electrostatic charging units 76 and 78 are shown in opposed relationship located on opposed sidewalls 72 and 74 of the fiber drawing unit 70. As shown in
Generally described, an electrostatic charging device may consist of one or more rows of electric emitter pins which produce a corona discharge, thereby imparting an electrostatic charge to the fibers, and the fibers, once charged, will tend to repel one another and help prevent groups of individual fibers from clumping or “roping” together. An exemplary process for charging fibers to produce nonwovens with improved fiber distribution is disclosed in co-assigned PCT Pub. No. WO 02/52071 to Haynes et al. published Jul. 4, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. A closer view of an exemplary electrostatic charging device is shown in
In one exemplary embodiment of a method of making a nonwoven web, the method comprises providing a plurality of fibers; subjecting the fibers to a pneumatic attenuation force in a drawing slot formed between opposed drawing slot sidewalls, the attenuation force imparting a velocity to the fibers; subjecting the fibers to an applied electrostatic charge, the electrostatic charge applied by an electrostatic charging unit located on one of the drawing slot sidewalls; reducing the velocity of the fibers in a diffusion chamber, the diffusion chamber being formed substantially between opposed diverging sidewalls; and thereafter collecting the fibers into a web on a moving forming surface. In this exemplary embodiment, the pneumatic attenuation force is provided by attenuation air entering the drawing slot only from the drawing slot sidewall opposing the drawing slot sidewall upon which the electrostatic charging unit is located.
In still another embodiment, to assist machine direction bundle spreading it may be desirable to utilize one or more electrostatic charging units inside the diffuser. Where more than one electrostatic charging unit is utilized inside the diffusion chamber, multiple electrostatic charging units may be located on the same diffusion chamber sidewall. However, it may also be desirable to have at least one electrostatic charging unit located on each sidewall of the diffusion chamber. Where electrostatic charging units are located on both sidewalls, they may be located substantially directly across from one another, that is, the electrostatic charging units may be located at substantially the same vertical height within diffusion chamber 80. However, it may also be advantageous to have the electrostatic charging units in the diffusion chamber located in a staggered configuration, similar to the staggered configuration described with respect to electrostatic charging units 76 and 78 in fiber drawing unit 70 in
In
Desirably, the sidewalls of the diffusion chamber are capable of adjustment as is shown by adjusting rods 314, 316 and 318 attached to sidewall 310 and adjusting rods 324, 326 and 328 attached to sidewall 320. As shown in
Returning to
The process line 10 further includes a bonding device such as the calender rolls 150 and 160 shown in
Lastly, the process line 10 further includes a winding roll 180 for taking up the bonded web 170. While not shown here, various additional potential processing and/or finishing steps known in the art such as web slitting, stretching, treating, or lamination of the nonwoven fabric into a composite with other materials, such as films or other nonwoven layers, may be performed without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Examples of web treatments include electret treatment to induce a permanent electrostatic charge in the web, or in the alternative antistatic treatments. Another example of web treatment includes treatment to impart wettability or hydrophilicity to a web comprising hydrophobic thermoplastic material. Wettability treatment additives may be incorporated into the polymer melt as an internal treatment, or may be added topically at some point following fiber or web formation. Still another example of web treatment includes treatment to impart repellency to low surface energy liquids such as alcohols, aldehydes and ketones. Examples of such liquid repellency treatments include fluorocarbon compounds added to the web or fibers of the web either topically or by adding the fluorocarbon compounds internally to the thermoplastic melt from which the fibers are extruded. In addition, as an alternative to taking the nonwoven web up on winding roll 180, the nonwoven web may be directed to various converting or product forming operations without winding.
In still another embodiment, the uniformity of the nonwoven web formation may be further improved or enhanced by perturbing the attenuating air which is supplied to the fiber drawing unit.
As an alternative and/or in addition to using perturbation valves, the transducers 418 and 428 shown in
In still another embodiment, a single electrostatic charging unit may be used, in either the diffusion chamber or in the fiber drawing slot, in conjunction with using specific application of aerodynamic forces to balance the repulsion forces created by the electrostatic charging unit. As an example, although it was stated above with reference to
In still another embodiment, the uniformity of the nonwoven web formation may be further improved or enhanced by utilizing vortex generators on or near the inner surface of the diverging sidewalls of the diffusion chamber. Vortex generators may be placed along one or more walls at spaced apart locations across the cross machine direction of the sidewall, to induce vortices into the airstream. The vortices induced will act to increase turbulence in the inner layer of the airstream close to the sidewall, adding energy to the flow in that area, and reduce flow separation, allowing for the airstream to more effectively conform to the sidewalls as the sidewalls diverge, and thus providing for a more complete machine direction dispersion of the airstream and consequently a larger machine direction fiber bundle spread. Vortices may be generated by having tabs or protrusions on one or more sidewalls at spaced apart locations, such as are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,695,377 to Triebes et al., incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Depending on placement of the vortex generators and amount of machine direction fiber bundle spread inside the diffusion chamber, catching or dragging of the fibers upon the vortex generators may be an issue. In that instance, it may be desirable to utilize as vortex generators dimples or inverted tabs which extend into the surface of the material forming the sidewall, rather than vortex generators which extend outwardly from the inner surface of the sidewall into the diffusion chamber.
Other methods of vortex generation may be employed with or in place of those described above. For example, one or more backward facing steps running substantially the cross-machine direction width of the diffusion chamber may be used on the inner sidewall surface to generate vortices. As another example, air jets may be used on one or both sidewalls to generate vortices by blowing fine jets of a fluid such as air through pores or holes drilled or otherwise formed in the sidewall surface material. As an alternative to actual air jets, synthetic jets such as are generally described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,988,522 to Glezer et al., incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, may be used on one or both sidewalls to generate vortices. Generally described, a synthetic jet may be produced from a fluid-filled chamber having a flexible actuatable membrane at one end and a more rigid wall at the other end, the rigid wall having a small hole. The flexible membrane may then be repeatedly actuated by acoustical wave energy, mechanical energy or piezoelectric energy, thereby causing a jet of fluid (such as air) to emanate from the hole in the more rigid wall at the other end of the chamber.
Although the invention has been described above primarily with respect to eductively-fed slot type fiber drawing units having substantially parallel sides, we believe its utility is not so limited and that it would be useful with other types of slot-draw fiber drawing systems. For example, we believe the non-eductive fiber drawing systems or linear fiber aspirators such as are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,340,563 and 4,405,297 to Appel et al., and fiber drawing systems with stretching chamber walls having a generally venturi nozzle-like cross section will also benefit, such as those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,692,106 to Grabowski et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 4,838,774 to Balk, both incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
As another embodiment of the present invention, the nonwoven web materials may be used in a laminate that contains at least one layer of nonwoven web and at least one additional layer such as a woven fabric layer, an additional nonwoven fabric layer, a foam layer or film layer. The additional layer or layers for the laminate may be selected to impart additional and/or complementary properties, such as liquid and/or microbe barrier properties. The laminate structures, consequently, are highly suitable for various uses including various skin-contacting applications, such as protective garments, covers for diapers, adult care products, training pants and sanitary napkins, various drapes, surgical gowns, and the like. The layers of the laminate can be bonded to form a unitary structure by a bonding process known in the art to be suitable for laminate structures, such as a thermal, ultrasonic or adhesive bonding process or mechanical or hydraulic entanglement processes.
As an example, a breathable film can be laminated to the nonwoven web to provide a breathable barrier laminate that exhibits a desirable combination of useful properties, such as soft texture, strength and barrier properties. As another example the nonwoven web can be laminated to a non-breathable film to provide a strong, high barrier laminate having a cloth-like texture. These laminate structures provide desirable cloth-like textural properties, improved strength properties and high barrier properties. Another laminate structure highly suitable for the present invention is the spunbond-meltblown-spunbond laminate material such as is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,041,203 to Brock et al., which is herein incorporated in its entirety by reference.
The nonwoven web materials made by the present invention are highly suitable for various uses, such as for example uses including disposable articles as described above, e.g., protective garments, sterilization wraps, surgical garments, and wiper cloths, and liners, covers and other components of absorbent articles.
The following examples are provided for illustration purposes and the invention is not limited thereto.
Example and Comparative spunbonded nonwoven webs were produced using commercially available isotactic polypropylene of approximately 35 melt flow rate, available from ExxonMobil Chemical Co. (Houston, Tex.) and designated as Exxon 3155. Materials were produced at basis weights of about 0.5 osy (about 17 gsm) (Examples 1 and 2, Comparatives 1 and 2) and about 0.4 osy (about 14 gsm) (Example 3 and Comparative 3) using a spunbond type slot-draw nonwoven spinning system such as described in the above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 3,802,817 to Matsuki et al. and, after being collected on a forming surface, all materials were thermally bonded using a calender having an HDD type bond pattern as described above. For all materials, the fibers had an average diameter of about 17-18 microns (about 1.8-2.0 denier). The Example and Comparative materials were made at polymer throughput rates of 11.0 pounds per spinplate transverse inch per hour (“PIH”) (about 196 kg/meter/hour) and 13.9 PIH (about 248 kg/meter/hour). The particular polymer throughput rate for each material is designated in TABLE 1. Comparative materials 1-3 were made by drawing fibers in a fiber drawing unit drawing slot and charging the fibers with a single electrostatic charging unit and using a segmented mechanical deflector target electrode substantially as is described in co-assigned PCT Pub. No. WO 02/52071 to Haynes et al. For the Example materials, an electrostatic charging apparatus and diffusion chamber were used as is described below.
For the Example materials, an electrostatic charging system was located near the fiber drawing unit drawing slot exit to charge the filament curtain as generally described in PCT Publication WO 02/52071 to Haynes et al. and as described herein with reference to
Also for the production of Examples 1-3, a diffusion chamber or diffuser substantially as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,814,349 to Geus et al. and as hereinabove described with respect to
A second set of Comparative materials, Comparatives 4 and 5, was made with both materials having a basis weight of about 0.50 osy (about 17 gsm) and utilizing the same fiber drawing unit and diffusion chamber and processing parameters as for Examples 1 and 2 except that no electrostatic charge was applied to the fibers during production of Comparative materials 4 and 5.
All the Comparative and Example materials were tested for peak tensile strength (highest force encountered when extending the material sample during the test) in the machine direction (“MD”) and in the cross machine direction (“CD”) using the strip tensile test method. Tensile strength testing was performed using a Sintech 2/S tensile tester available from the SinTech Corporation (Carey, N.C.) in accordance with ASTM-D-5035-90, except that 3 inch (76.2 mm) wide by 6 inch (152.4 mm) long cut strip samples were used instead of the one inch (25.4 mm) or two inch (50.8 mm) wide samples specified in procedure D-5035-90. The materials were tested for tensile strength in each of the CD and MD directions and the results of fifteen repetitions for each sample in each direction were averaged for each material. The results for the tensile testing are shown in TABLE 1 and TABLE 2 and are reported as the load in grams required to extend the material.
In the TABLES, Example and Comparative materials having the same basis weight and produced at the same polymer throughput rate are compared. For example, in TABLE 1, Example 1 is compared to Comparative 1 because both were approximately 0.50 osy (17 gsm) webs and both were produced at a polymer throughput rate of about 11.0 PIH (about 196 kg/meter/hour), Example 2 is compared to Comparative 2, and so on. As can be seen in TABLE 1, for each Example-Comparative pairing, the cross machine direction (CD) tensile strength is significantly higher in the Example materials than in the Comparative materials, for both basis weights of material tested and for both polymer throughput rates at which the materials were produced.
The tensile strengths of Examples 1 and 2 are also shown compared to the Comparatives 4 and 5 in TABLE 2. All materials listed in TABLE 2 were the same basis weight, about 0.50 osy (about 17 gsm). Each Example material is compared to the Comparative material produced at the same polymer throughput rate. For example, Example 1 is compared to Comparative 4 because both were produced at a polymer throughput rate of about 11.0 PIH (about 196 kg/meter/hour) and Example 2 is compared to Comparative 5. For the Example materials the total material tensile (i.e., the combined CD plus MD tensile strengths) was higher than for the Comparative materials. It can also be seen that the amount of increase in total tensile became more favorable as the material production rates increased from 196 to 248 kilogram/meter/hour. It was also noted upon visual inspection of the materials that the formation of the Example materials appeared more uniform than the Comparative materials of the same basis weight, and that this uniformity difference became even more pronounced as the material production rates increased from 196 to 248 kilogram/meter/hour.
Numerous other patents have been referred to in the specification and to the extent there is any conflict or discrepancy between the teachings incorporated by reference and that of the present specification, the present specification shall control. Additionally, while the invention has been described in detail with respect to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various alterations, modifications and/or other changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. It is therefore intended that all such modifications, alterations and other changes be encompassed by the claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3052009 | Epstein et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
| 3163753 | Sabato et al. | Dec 1964 | A |
| 3197351 | Selby | Jul 1965 | A |
| 3296678 | Bundy et al. | Jan 1967 | A |
| 3302237 | Cope et al. | Feb 1967 | A |
| 3325906 | Franke | Jun 1967 | A |
| 3338992 | Kinney | Aug 1967 | A |
| 3341394 | Kinney | Sep 1967 | A |
| 3456156 | Kilby et al. | Jul 1969 | A |
| 3563838 | Edwards | Feb 1971 | A |
| 3655305 | Baxter et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
| 3689608 | Hollberg et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3692618 | Dorschner et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3711898 | Debbas | Jan 1973 | A |
| 3720741 | Cunningham et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
| 3802817 | Matsuki et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
| 3849241 | Butin et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
| 3855046 | Hansen et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
| 3860369 | Brethauer et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
| 3967118 | Sternberg | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3979538 | Gilman et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3991244 | Debbas | Nov 1976 | A |
| 3993812 | Debbas et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4009508 | Sternberg | Mar 1977 | A |
| 4041203 | Brock et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
| 4086381 | Cheshire et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
| 4088726 | Cumbers | May 1978 | A |
| 4163305 | Semjonow et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
| 4170680 | Cumbers | Oct 1979 | A |
| 4187586 | Semjonow | Feb 1980 | A |
| 4208366 | Kinney | Jun 1980 | A |
| 4233014 | Kinney | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4340563 | Appel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
| 4380104 | Kamioka et al. | Apr 1983 | A |
| 4405297 | Appel et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
| 4430277 | Lin | Feb 1984 | A |
| 4517143 | Kisler | May 1985 | A |
| 4537733 | Farago | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4553996 | Muschelknautz et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
| 4657793 | Fisher | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4692106 | Grabowski et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4790736 | Keuchel | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4810180 | Isner | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4812112 | Balk | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4813864 | Balk | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4820142 | Balk | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4820459 | Reifenhäuser | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4838774 | Balk | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4968238 | Satterfield et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 5032329 | Reifenhäuser | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5045248 | Satterfield et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5073436 | Antonacci et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5108820 | Kaneko et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5108827 | Gessner | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5122048 | Deeds | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5123983 | Marshall | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5173356 | Eaton et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5182162 | Andrusko | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5187005 | Stahle et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5200620 | Peritt et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5225018 | Zeldin et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5256224 | Gillyns et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5283097 | Gillyns et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5295324 | Baba et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5296172 | Davis et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5308691 | Lim et al. | May 1994 | A |
| 5336552 | Strack et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5382400 | Pike et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5397413 | Trimble et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5439364 | Gerking et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5460500 | Geus et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
| 5571537 | Geus et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5695377 | Triebes et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5702730 | Reifenhäuser | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707468 | Arnold et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5762857 | Weng et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5766646 | Geus et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5807795 | Lau et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5814349 | Geus et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5820888 | Geus et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5853628 | Varona | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5988522 | Glezer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5989004 | Cook | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6049956 | Lifke et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6117379 | Haynes et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6379136 | Najour et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6386260 | Ferencz et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6660218 | Davis et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6783722 | Taylor | Aug 2004 | B2 |
| 6966762 | Maggio et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6974316 | Maggio | Dec 2005 | B2 |
| 7488441 | Haynes et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 20040028763 | Schmit et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0950744 | Oct 1999 | EP |
| 2825381 | May 2001 | FR |
| 2825381 | Dec 2001 | FR |
| WO 9321370 | Oct 1993 | WO |
| WO 0065134 | Nov 2000 | WO |
| WO 0129295 | Apr 2001 | WO |
| WO 0204719 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 0234990 | May 2002 | WO |
| WO 02052071 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 02055778 | Jul 2002 | WO |
| WO 02097182 | Dec 2002 | WO |
| WO 03038174 | May 2003 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050087287 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |
