Patent Application
20090205947
The present invention is directed to a method for removal of malodorous compounds from a gaseous stream, and more particularly, for removing trimethylamine in exhaust gases.
Environmental odor pollution problems (malodors) generate a significant fraction of publicly initiated complaints received by air pollution control districts (“Critical Review: The Health Significance of Environmental Odor Pollution,” Archives of Environmental Health, January-February 1992 v47 n1 p76(12)). As noted by Dennis Shusterman in that review, “Noxious environmental odors may trigger symptoms by a variety of physiologic mechanisms, including exacerbation of underlying medical conditions, innate odor aversions, aversive conditioning phenomena, stress induced illness, and possible pheromanal reactions.” The sources of such odors can be municipal, agricultural or industrial and are typically well-known within a community, but due to the transient nature of exposures, abatement and enforcement has often been difficult. Air pollution standards are typically applied to either emissions or ambient air quality as a means to regulate malodors. Emission standards have been used by the EPA to regulate specific industries, and local jurisdictions have begun to impose emissions standards (for example the San Francisco Bay Area Air Quality Management District has established emission standards for 5 types of compounds: dimethylsulfide, ammonia, mercaptans, phenolic compounds and trimethylamine).
Trimethylamine (TMA) is one example of a malodorous gas. Specifically, TMA is a gas produced by the decomposition of fish; it is a breakdown product of ATP-related compounds in the fish's muscle tissue (Science News, Oct. 29, 1988 v134 n18 p287(1)). Fish food manufacturers are particularly prone to emit malodorous TMA because fish food comes from processed fish. During the processing of fish food, a small amount of trimethylamine (TMA) is released and results in fugitive and point source emissions from the plant. Although the concentration released is very low (on the order of a few parts per million (ppm)) and poses no health risk, TMA is a very offensive odor and can be classified as a malodor. The TMA malodor produced at fish food manufacturers has resulted in a long-standing problem between the company and local residents, and the residents have lodged many complaints over the years. Certain companies have taken a number of positive steps toward resolving a malodor problem associated with TMA emissions.
Nevertheless, there remains a need for an improved method for the reduction of malodorous compounds such as TMA.
The present invention relates to a method of remedying malodorous compounds present in an air stream as an unwanted by-product from a process. More specifically, the invention relates to a method of removing malodorous compounds, such as trimethylamine (TMA), present in an air stream. In another aspect, the invention relates to a method of using at least one low-voltage electron beam energy source to remove small quantities of malodorous compounds in air. In yet another aspect, the invention relates to the use of the electron beam energy source to beneficially form ozone to enhance the reduction of small quantities of compounds such as TMA in air.
According to one exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides a method for removing compounds from a gaseous exhaust stream by contacting the exhaust stream with a low energy electron beam (EB) energy source. According to another exemplary embodiment, the present invention provides a method for removing trimethylamine (TMA) from a gaseous exhaust stream by contacting the exhaust stream containing TMA with a low-voltage electron beam energy source and forming ozone.
The invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in connection with the accompanying drawing. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawing are not to scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features are arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Included in the drawing are the following figures:
According to one exemplary embodiment, this invention provides a method for the remediation of malodorous compounds in an air stream, such as from an exhaust stream from a manufacturing process, through the use of relatively low energy electron beams. The method of the invention can be used to suppress a wide range of malodorous compounds without the generation of unwanted breakdown components. For example, according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the amine containing compound, trimethylamine (TMA), contained in an air stream in concentrations less than 0.05% on a volume basis, is removed from a gaseous stream without the significant generation of unwanted nitrogen oxides (NOx). According to another exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the concomitant in-situ production of ozone generated by the electrons interacting with atmospheric oxygen improves the abatement efficiency process. Abatement efficiencies are effected by operating in a specific parameter space (including concentration, residence time, applied energy, electron flux density, relative humidity).
According to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, a dual electron beam emitter device is optionally used as a source of electron beams to abate low concentrations of gaseous compounds. A dual beam electron emitter produces electrons by passing an electric current (beam current) through a tungsten filament in a vacuum, and those electrons are accelerated by an electric field potential (voltage) through a titanium window (the titanium window necessary to maintain vacuum at the filament). The number of electrons emitted per unit time is proportional to the beam current, and the speed at which they accelerate is proportional to the accelerating voltage; the beam current and accelerating voltage define the beam power.
To the extent to which malodorous compounds are reduced, and which ozone (from atmospheric oxygen) is produced by the abatement system, is principally a function of the dose of electron beam (EB). EB dose is a function of EB power and exposure (minus the losses that occur at the titanium window). EB power can be controlled by varying the beam current and/or voltage. Exposure is a function of volumetric flow rate of the effluent stream and the geometry of the chamber wherein the effluent is exposed to the EB.
Although not intending to be bound to a particular theory, it is believed that energy in the applied EB dose disrupts the chemical bonds of the malodorous compound. An exemplary malodorous compound is the tertiary amine TMA, having a chemical formula of (CH3)3N. The extent to which TMA is reduced depends on the energy applied by the EB dose to likely disrupt the C—H bonds and/or the C—N bonds. This bond energy, also called dissociation energy, is defined as the amount of energy needed to rupture all of a particular type of chemical bond in one mole of gaseous molecules to give gaseous atoms as products. Bond energies are nearly the same in many different compounds. For example, average bond energies in polyatomic molecules can be found in Table 1.
Electron beam (EB) system 14 is illustrated in more detail in
An example of a dual beam electron emitter is available from Advanced Electron Beams, Inc., 10 Upton Drive, Wilmington, Mass. 01887, such as the eTronBeam-100. Also, examples of electron beam emitters are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,702,984 entitled “Decontamination Apparatus,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,674,229 entitled “Electron Beam Emitter,” U.S. Pat. No. 6,630,774 entitled “Electron Beam Emitter,” and U.S. Pat. No. 6,407,492 entitled “Electron Beam Accelerator”, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. In order to accommodate increased volumetric flow rates of malodorous gas to be treated, multiple EB systems can be arranged in parallel and/or in series and/or EB systems can be expanded to contain a greater number of EB emitters. According to an alternative embodiment, a fractional portion of the exhaust gas may be recirculated. With this arrangement, it may be possible to improve the destruction efficiency of certain compounds and/or increase the capacity of exhaust gas that can be treated by a fixed number of EB emitters.
Analytical tests were performed to establish the concentrations of TMA, ozone, nitric oxide, and nitrogen dioxide in the output gas feed of an EB malodorous abatement system. Testing was completed using detection tubes (available from Gastek Corporation, Kanagawa, Japan) by sampling air suspected of containing a gaseous compound of interest, TMA, drawn into the test tube. The test tube was packed with a media material that reacts with TMA. Reaction of the media material in the test tube generates a color change, which indicates the concentration at the sample location in parts per million (ppm). Table 2 specifies the tube used for analyzing individual compounds in the inlet and exit streams.
A lecture bottle of TMA was used as the control in the input gas of the system. The gas flow rate was regulated by fitting a pressure gauge, rotometer, and metering valve to the lecture bottle. Flow rates of the gas typically varied between 4 to 50 standard cubic centimeters per minute (sccm).
EB Interaction with Air
Tests were performed with the EB abatement system to establish the effects of the EB interaction with ambient air. The main concern was the extent to which electrons interact with nitrogen or oxygen molecules in the chamber. Since air consists of 79% nitrogen and 21% oxygen, the major concern was the formation of NOx and ozone resulting from the interactions with electrons. Tests were performed to determine if these compounds were formed, the effect of various concentrations of TMA, and the effect of NOx and ozone on the destruction of TMA.
Tests were also conducted using a volumetric flow rate of air of approximately 20 standard cubic feet per minute (scfm). Gas testing was done using the Gastek Tube No. 11L for NOx. This detection tube analyzes for nitric oxide, NO, as well as nitrogen dioxide, NO2. The exiting air stream was tested for NOx compounds with the EB system off. No NOx compounds were found. When the EB system was turned on at the highest voltage and current possible (100 kV, 10 milliamp), the quantity of NOx in the exit stream was still not detectable. In other words, under these operating conditions at ambient temperature, electrons interacting with diatomic molecular nitrogen are not energetic enough to form NOx compounds.
EB Generation of Ozone
Tests were run to establish the concentrations of ozone present in the abatement system. The Gastek Tube No. 18M was used to determine ozone concentrations. These tests were done with an airflow rate of approximately 20 scfm and no TMA present. At the exit of the EB system, concentrations of ozone typically varied between 100 and 160 parts per million (ppm). The concentration of ozone varied little as the voltage and current were changed. The presence of small quantities of ozone in the EB system is expected to enhance the overall efficiency of destruction.
Preliminary EB Tests with TMA
Tests were performed to ascertain whether the EB energy would reduce the TMA present in an airstream. TMA was introduced into the EB system under varying conditions of TMA concentration, volumetric flowrates of air, and applied power output of the EB power supply. In
TMA Tests at Low Flow Rates
In these experiments, the total flow was maintained constant at approximately 4 scfm. The TMA was introduced at a flow rate of 6 scfm. At these flow rates, the concentration of TMA at the inlet to the EB abatement system was approximately 30 ppm. Three sets of experimental conditions were tested as described below:
1. TMA in dry air (˜0% RH)
2. TMA in dry nitrogen+ambient air
3. TMA in ambient air with moisture added (>99% RH)
For each of these three conditions, a text matrix was run that varied the input voltage and emitter current. Typical input voltage varied between 80 and 100 kilovolts and a typical emitter current ranged from 3 to 10 milliamps.
Table 3 represents the results from the testing performed at a flow rate of 4 scfm and an input concentration of 30 ppm. The table shows the input voltage in kilovolt and current in milliamp used for each experimental condition, and the exit concentration for TMA in parts per million under those operating conditions. The three columns representing Tests 1, 2, and 3 represent the three different feed gas compositions going into the EB system.
To impart moisture into the gas feed, the input (shown by input 12 in
An analysis of the data in Table 3 indicates that the amount of TMA in air passing through the EB abatement system is reduced. Test 1 for TMA in dry air, indicates exit concentrations of TMA between 1 and 2 ppm. These results seem to span the entire operating range of voltage and current in the emitter. In general, there appears to be a minor difference in the exit gas concentration of TMA as a function of input voltage or emitter current. For Test 2, using pure dry nitrogen to dilute the TMA, the same set of conditions was tested. Across the range of each parameter tested, a slightly higher TMA concentration was observed in the exit stream. Test 3 used an ambient air stream laden with moisture to dilute the TMA. As the results indicate, TMA is successfully destroyed under conditions where moisture is present in the air stream entering the EB abatement system. The concentration of TMA in the exit gas stream once again varied between 1 and 2 ppm consistent with data observed for Test 1. The results indicate that the presence of moisture is not deleterious to the overall mechanism of reduction of malodorous compounds. Although not intending to be bound to a particular theory, the test results also indicate that oxygen present in the effluent stream may be beneficial in the destruction of TMA through the formation of ozone.
TMA Tests at High Flow Rates
Additional experimentation was conducted at a higher volumetric flow rate of air through the EB abatement system. In these experiments, a total volumetric flow rate of 200 scfm was used. TMA was metered into the gaseous air stream to a concentration of approximately 5 ppm. Testing was done under conditions with and without moisture present in the air stream. Experimental operating conditions of the EB system were varied and the exit concentration of TMA was tested. Input voltage was varied between 80 and 100 kV and the emitter current was varied between 3 and 10 milliamp. Table 4 summarizes the results for higher volumetric flow rate experimentation.
Under conditions of 200 cubic feet per minute of relatively dry air and 5 ppm of TMA in the inlet stream, the EB system removed the TMA to levels of approximately 0.5 ppm. At these flow rates and TMA concentrations, there was a slight difference in the exiting gas concentration of TMA based on kilovolts input to the emitter. Both 100 kV and 80 kV removed TMA to a concentration of 0.5 ppm in the exhaust when operating at 10 milliamp. Otherwise, a decrease in input voltage resulted in a reduction of the decrease in TMA concentration in the exit stream. There was an observed correlation with the emitter current at a voltage of 80 kV. There was also an observed decrease in the TMA concentration when the emitter current was increased. For example, when the emitter current increased from 3 to 10 milliamp, the exit gas concentration of TMA was decreased from 1.8 ppm to 0.5 ppm, indicating dose dependence.
The same experimental matrix was repeated using 200 cubic feet per minute and approximately 5 ppm of TMA. In this set of experiments the air was laden with moisture. Under these conditions operating at 100 kV and 10 milliamp, only 0.5 ppm TMA remained in the exhaust. At 100 kV and 3 milliamp, TMA concentration increased to 0.8 ppm. While operating at 80 kV and 10 milliamp, the exit gas concentration of TMA was 0.8 ppm. The TMA concentration was observed to increase as the current from the emitter was decreased. A decrease in emitter current to 3 milliamp resulted in a concentration of 2 ppm of TMA in the exhaust.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/US2006/004755 | 2/10/2006 | WO | 00 | 10/29/2008 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60651811 | Feb 2005 | US |
