The present invention generally relates to a sheet material having a surface applied security device and to a method for preparing such a sheet material. More particularly, the invention relates to the surface application of the security device to a sheet material by introducing the security device to the fibrous web during a wet stage of a paper manufacturing process where the fibrous web is sufficiently consolidated; such as when the water and/or moisture content of the fibrous web is less than 98% by weight, based on the total weight of the fibrous web. The present invention also relates to a document made from the resulting fibrous sheet material.
Security devices in the form of stripes, bands, threads, or ribbons are used extensively in security and value documents, providing visual and/or mechanical means for verifying the authenticity of these documents. These security devices may be either fully embedded or partially embedded in the documents, or mounted on a surface thereof.
Security devices that are at least partially embedded can be applied to a forming fibrous web by introducing the security device into the fibrous web during a wet stage of a paper manufacturing process. However, introduction of security devices into the fibrous web in this stage, while suitable for embedded and partially embedded security devices, have heretofore been impractical for surface applied security devices since the resulting sheet material or document would be susceptible to reduced durability. At this stage, the composition of the forming fibrous web is constituted of pulp or fibers and water and/or other moisture. The fibrous web being substantially wet is such that the amount of pulp or fiber ranges from about 0.2 to about 2.0 percent (%) by weight pulp or fiber, while the amount of water or moisture ranges from about 99.8 to about 98.0% by weight moisture or water. For example, in a wet stage application, security devices can be introduced onto or into a forming fibrous web at the wet end of a Fourdrinier or twin wire paper machine, or against a fibrous web forming cylinder in a cylinder paper machine before that portion of the forming cylinder is immersed in pulp or furnish.
It has been found that during the wet stage introduction of the security device to the forming fibrous web, some of the fibers are displaced as they flow around the security device as it is pressed into the fibrous web. This results in displacement of an amount of fibers, from a sub-region (i.e., a region of the fibrous web located under or beneath the security device) and hinge areas (i.e., regions of the fibrous web located next to edges or sides of the security device) that is enough to affect the interaction of the security device with the fibrous web or with the substrate of the resulting sheet material or document. The resulting concentration of fibers in the sub-region and hinge areas is less than the concentration of fibers in the bulk region. This results in weak connective interaction at the interface of the security device and the substrate of the sheet material or document and in particular results in weak connective interaction at the interfacing surface and/or edges of the security device. During use or circulation of resulting documents, these weak regions produce tears in the sheet materials or documents along the interfacing edges between the security device and the substrate or produce a hinge effect (i.e., separated regions between interfacing edges). Moreover, the document tends to demonstrate backside show-through; that is, the applied security device when applied on one side of the fibrous web will produce a shadow effect that is observable from an opposing side of the fibrous web, any resulting fibrous sheet material or any resulting document. This often requires the use of a backside camouflage coating to address the problem. It has also been observed that said resulting sheet material or document demonstrates a reduction in cross-direction (CD) tensile strength.
One alternative for obtaining a surface applied security device is to apply the security device to a surface of a fully formed fibrous substrate. However, application to a fully formed fibrous substrate is accompanied by other substantial limitations. For example, this limits the thickness range of the security device that can be used. Generally, surface application is limited to the very thinnest of security devices, less than 15 microns. Thicker security devices are generally excluded from such applications at least in part because the resulting caliper differential on a resulting sheet material affects downstream processing. As used herein, the term “caliper differential” refers to the difference in height between an upper surface of the security device and an upper surface of the immediate adjoining bulk-region of the fibrous sheet material. Due to the caliper differential produced with thicker security devices that are introduced either in a dry stage of the paper manufacturing process or in a post application process, downstream processes such as winding, sheeting, stacking, cutting and processing through ATMs are impacted in terms of time and costs. Significantly, stacks produced this way are not press-ready or print ready.
In view of the above, there remains a need for improved sheet materials with surface applied security devices regardless of thickness and for improved processes that can produce these sheet materials.
The present invention addresses at least one of the above needs by providing a method for the surface application of a security device to a fibrous sheet material or document by introducing the security device to a forming fibrous web during a wet stage of paper manufacturing. The method comprises introducing a security device onto or into a forming fibrous web during a wet stage of the paper manufacturing process where the fibrous web is sufficiently consolidated. In one embodiment, the fibrous web is sufficiently consolidated when the fibrous web has a water or moisture content of less than 98% by weight, based on the total weight of the fibrous web. Preferably, the fibrous web is sufficiently consolidated when the fibrous web is at or near a couch roll or similar tool of a paper machine. The present invention also provides a fibrous sheet material, produced by the above process and a resulting document comprising the fibrous sheet material. The fibrous sheet material has opposing surfaces, on a fibrous substrate, at least one recess in one surface thereof, a fibrous sub-region disposed under or beneath the recess, and a fibrous bulk-region disposed next to the recess and the sub-region; a surface applied security device disposed in the recess; and an interface between the surface applied security device and the one surface; wherein there are fibers in the fibrous sub-region and in the fibrous bulk-region that are present in substantially equivalent amounts.
Surprisingly, it has been found that the surface applied security device can be introduced during a wet stage where the fibrous web is sufficiently consolidated as, for example, a fully formed wet web. By introducing the security device at this wet stage of the paper manufacturing process, the security device can be adequately forced into the fibrous web to further consolidate the fibers in the sub-region rather than displacing them. This in turn helps in providing increased connective interaction between the fibers and the surface applied security device. As a result, at least one of durability, ink adhesion, cross-directional (CD) tensile strength, and backside show-through is improved. These surprising advantages avoid the requirement for further processing steps to improve ink adhesion, improve tensile strength or camouflage backside show-through. Moreover, because the security device is introduced during a wet stage where the fibrous web is sufficiently consolidated, it becomes possible to force the security device into the fibrous web thereby enabling the use of thicker security devices, since their caliper differential can be substantially reduced. The resulting caliper differential thereby has less effect on downstream processes.
By way of the methods provided herein, Applicant also surprisingly found that the surface applied security devices could be applied in register with at least one other feature in the fibrous web, the fibrous sheet material or a resulting document. Moreover, because the security device is introduced during the wet stage of the fibrous web manufacturing process, it is possible to adjust the registration during the paper manufacturing process. Accordingly, further processing steps are avoided that would otherwise be required to correct misalignment of the security device with the other features. Introducing the security device in a continuous manner also avoids the requirement for a carrier substrate, since the security device can be cut/punched and introduced to the fibrous web with a single intro-device. As used herein, the term “intro-device” refers to a device used for cutting/punching and also introducing the security device to the fibrous web during the wet stage. Suitable intro-device is described further herein.
Those of ordinary skill in the art will be able to discern other features and advantages of the invention by following the detailed description and drawings. Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. All publications, patent applications, patents and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including definitions, will control. In addition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting. Moreover, all ranges explicitly recited herein also implicitly cover all sub-ranges.
The present disclosure may be better understood with reference to the following drawings. Components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the present disclosure. While exemplary embodiments are disclosed in connection with the drawings, there is no intent to limit the present disclosure to the embodiment or embodiments disclosed herein. On the contrary, the intent is to cover all alternatives, modifications and equivalents.
Particular features of the disclosed invention are illustrated by reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The invention will be further understood by the following details, which are provided as descriptions of certain exemplary embodiments of the claimed invention.
By way of the method of the present invention a fibrous sheet material comprising a surface applied security device is provided. In a first aspect of the invention, a method is provided for the surface application of a security device to a fibrous sheet material. The method comprises, introducing the security device into or onto a fibrous web during paper manufacturing. By introducing the security document during the paper manufacturing process, known processing steps are uninterrupted and additional processing steps are eliminated. Moreover, by introducing the security device during a wet stage of the paper manufacturing process, security devices thicker than those that could be applied in a dry stage of paper manufacturing, can hereby be applied.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises further consolidating the fibers in the sub-region. To further consolidate the fibers in the sub-region, the surface applied security device is pressed into the sufficiently consolidated fibrous web. The fibers densify in this region such that although the volume of the sub-region is reduced, the amount of fibers in this region are not displaced; at least not in any significant amounts.
As used herein, the term “sufficiently consolidated” will be understood, relative to the present disclosure, by those of ordinary skill in the art, to mean that the fibrous web is in a fully formed wet web state. In this wet web stage, the fibrous web comprises less than 98% water and/or moisture. Accordingly, the fibrous web comprises greater than 2% fiber and/or pulp. In another embodiment, the fibrous web comprises less than 95% water and/or moisture with the remaining 5% of constituents being fiber and/or pulp. In a more preferred embodiment, the water and/or moisture in the fibrous web ranges from about 60% to less than 98%, or from about 60% to about 95%. Applicant has found that a water and/or moisture content above 98% results in displacement of fibers when the security device is introduced. Significant displacement of the fibers, especially in a sub-region of the substrate, results in weak interactions between the security device and the fibers in the substrate. Particularly, the displacement of fibers reduces the durability and strength of the substrate and reduces the camouflaging effect provided in the sub-region and in the hinge area. As noted herein, these weak interactions, especially at the interfacing edges of the security device, results in the problems identified above. Correspondingly, it has also been found that where the fibrous web has less than 60% water and/or moisture, introduction of the security device during the paper manufacturing process does not sufficiently allow the recessing of the security device to accommodate thicker security devices while still maintaining a low caliper differential. Moreover, at below 60% water and/or moisture the fibers in the sub-region do not further consolidate enough to secure the fibers near the interfacing edges of the security device. As used herein, the term “recessing” refers to the pressing of the security device into the fibrous web to form a relief/recess in the substrate surface of the fibrous sheet material such that at least a portion of the height of the security device is recessed below the surface height of the bulk region while a top or upper surface area of the security device remains exposed.
The wet stage, as defined above, can be adjusted to be at various locations along a paper manufacturing machine and the present invention contemplates all of those possibilities. However, in a preferred embodiment the security device is applied into or onto a forming fibrous web during a wet stage of the paper manufacturing process, such as for example, at or near a couch roll or similar tool of a paper machine when the fibrous web constitutes a sufficiently consolidated, or fully formed wet web (i.e., having a moisture or water level of less than 98% by weight of the fibrous web, preferably from about 60% to less than 98% by weight of the fibrous web; or more preferably from about 60% to about 95% by weight of the fibrous web; or from about 60% to about 90% by weight of the fibrous web, based on the total weight of the fibrous web). Suction boxes are typically located right before the couch roll to remove as much moisture as possible before the web leaves the wet end of the machine so as to minimize the burden on the machine's dryer section. Similarly, upon leaving the cylinder part of the cylinder paper machine (and after the couch roll), the fibrous web will preferably be made up of from about 75% to about 95% water and/or moisture and from about 5% to about 25% pulp or fiber.
While several stages of paper manufacture on a Fourdrinier paper machine are contemplated as providing sufficient consolidation (as defined herein) of the fibrous web, in a preferred embodiment the stage of paper manufacture where the security device is introduced to the fibrous web is directly after the wet line and before the couch roll. This is the point at which there is no more surface water apparent on an upper side of the fibrous web. In an alternative embodiment, the security device is introduced to the fibrous web on or before a vacuum box in the wet end, which advantageously helps set the device into the web. Preferably, the security device is placed directly to the face of the fibrous web via a delivery wheel, a roller or a contacting shoe.
In one embodiment, upon moving past or further beyond the couch roll the fibrous web is in a state of being a fully formed web with surface applied security device as it proceeds to the dry end of the paper machine, which consists of both the press section and the dryer section.
In the press section of both types of paper machines, water and/or moisture is removed by compressing the wet paper between rollers and felts to reduce the water and/or moisture content to a desired level. Applicant has surprisingly found that compression of the fully formed wet web with surface applied security device causes fibers in the sub-region (i.e., the area of the fibrous web that is below or beneath the introduced security device) to be further consolidated as they are densified instead of displaced. As a result, the strength characteristics of the resulting fibrous sheet material or resulting document as well as backside opaqueness, which provides camouflaging of the security device to reduce backside show-through, are improved.
Security devices of the present invention may be of various thicknesses. However, it has been found that the present inventive process advantageously allows the surface application of security devices that are on the thicker end of the thickness spectrum. In one embodiment, the security devices are of thicknesses of up to 100 microns (μm). In another embodiment, the security device has a thickness ranging from 5 to 75 μm or more preferably, from 10 to 50 μm. The width of the security device is limited only by the width of the fibrous sheet material. In a preferred embodiment, the width ranges from 0.25 to 20 millimeters (mm); more preferably from 0.5 to 15 mm.
By introducing the security device during a wet stage of paper manufacturing, these security devices can be pressed into the fibrous web to produce a recess in the surface of the resulting fibrous sheet material. The resulting fibrous sheet material comprises a surface applied security device, which has a caliper differential that does not result in the disadvantages identified above. As used herein, the term “caliper differential” refers to the difference in height between an upper surface of the security device and an upper surface of the immediate adjoining bulk-region of the fibrous sheet material. The caliper differential can be negative or positive, or zero. A negative caliper differential is provided when the height of the upper surface of the immediate adjoining bulk-region is greater than the height of the upper surface of the security device. Alternatively, a positive caliper differential is provided when the height of the upper surface of the security device is greater than the height of the upper surface of the immediate adjoining bulk region. In one embodiment, the caliper differential is expressed relative to the thickness of the security device. In this embodiment, the absolute value of the caliper differential ranges from 0% to about 80% of the thickness of the security device.
In one embodiment, the caliper differential ranges from −10 to about 50 μm. More preferably, the caliper differential ranges from −5 to 30 μm; or from 0 to 25 μm.
In certain embodiments, the device is sufficiently thick such that pressing of the security device into the fibrous wet web results is a negative caliper differential (i.e., the thickness or height of the security device is less than the thickness or height of the bulk region). In such embodiments, caliper differential is best characterized by a reference to the absolute value of the caliper differential relative to the thickness of the security device. For example, in one embodiment the thickness of the security device is less than 25 μm such that when the security device is pressed into the fibrous web the absolute value of the caliper differential of the surface applied security device ranges from 0% to about 50%; more preferably from 0% to about 30%; even more preferably from about 0% to about 10% of the thickness of the security device. In one other embodiment, the thickness of the security device is again less than 25 μm such that further consolidation of the sub-region by pressing the security device into the fibrous web, produces a caliper differential ranging from −10 to 15 μm; preferably −5 to 10 μm.
Alternatively, in one embodiment the thickness of the security device is greater than 25 μm such that further consolidation of the sub-region by pressing the security device into the fibrous web produces a caliper differential ranging from −10 to 50 μm; preferably from −5 to 25 μm or from 0 to 15 μm. In one other embodiment where the security device also has a thickness of greater than 25 μm, the absolute value of the caliper differential relative to the thickness of the security device ranges from 0% to about 50%. Preferably, the absolute value of the caliper differential ranges from 0% to about 20% of the thickness of the security device.
A “couch roll” will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art as a guide or turning roll for a Fourdrinier wire on a Fourdrinier paper machine, positioned where the paper web leaves the wire (i.e., the wet end or paper forming section) and the wire returns to the breast roll. The couch roll serves the same purpose on a cylinder paper machine where the Fourdrinier wire part has been replaced by a cylinder part. Specifically, as the web leaves the cylinder part and travels toward the couch roll, the couch roll guides and turns the web.
Although it is also contemplated that the entire fibrous web has a uniform consistency with regards to the water and/or moisture content and fiber content, it is also within the scope of the present invention that the fibrous web is non-uniformly sufficiently consolidated. For example, in one embodiment, the fibrous web is only sufficiently consolidated at or along a point of introduction. As used herein, the “point of introduction” refers to the region at or along the fibrous web that is at least partially covered by the security device. In another embodiment, the fibrous web is only partially sufficiently consolidated or is sufficiently consolidated in a gradient or matrix pattern, such that at the point of introduction, the fibers are not significantly dispersed to lead to the identified disadvantages. A sufficiently consolidated gradient or matrix pattern can be provided, for example, by selective vacuuming at locations along the forming fibrous web. Alternatively, in one embodiment, the moisture content is removed in a gradient or matrix pattern by applying a radiation source (i.e., heat) to remove top-surface water at selected locations along the forming fibrous web.
Introduction of the security device to the fibrous web forms an interface between the security device and the substrate fibrous web, the resulting fibrous sheet material or the resulting document. The term “interface” as used herein can be formed by either direct or indirect contact between the security device and the substrate. Where the interface is direct, the security device is in direct contact with the fibers in the substrate. However, it is contemplated that the security device forms an indirect interface along some or all bottom and side surfaces with the substrate. For example, the interface may comprise other materials between the security device and the substrate. While various materials are contemplated, further fibrous or polymeric materials, for example, monocomponent and/or multicomponent fibers obtained from natural sources such as vegetative sources, or spun from polymer melt compositions, etc., alone or in combination, are particularly suitable. Moreover adhesive materials are preferred for forming the indirect interface. Activatable adhesives may be used to anchor or bond the security device onto or within the fibrous web's recessed surface. Suitable adhesives are not limited and include, but are not limited to, water-, heat- and/or pressure-activating adhesives that activate in a dryer section of the paper machine, where temperatures reach between 100° C. and 160° C. These coatings may be applied in the form of solvent-based polymer solutions or aqueous solutions or dispersions. Suitable dispersions are selected from the group of acrylic resin dispersions, epoxy resin dispersions, natural latex dispersions, polyurethane resin dispersions, polyvinyl acetate resin dispersions, polyvinyl alcohol resin dispersions, urea formaldehyde resin dispersions, vinyl acetate resin dispersions, ethylene vinyl acetate resin dispersions, ethylene vinyl alcohol resin dispersions, polyester resin dispersions, and mixtures thereof. Upon moving past the couch roll, the fully formed wet web with surface applied security device proceeds to the dry end of the paper machine, which consists of both the press section and the dryer section. The adhesive may alternatively form part of the security device and in such embodiments have a thickness ranging from 5 to about 50 μm; preferably from 5 to about 20 μm.
Security devices suitable for the present invention include those generally used in the art by those of ordinary skill to provide security against forgery or counterfeiting. The security devices may be those suitable for alternatively or additionally applying aesthetic characteristics to a substrate. Suitable security devices may display information that is humanly perceivable either directly or with the aid of a device or may display information that is additionally or alternatively perceivable by a machine. The security device may employ one or more of the following features: demetalized or selectively metalized, magnetic, combined magnetic and metallic, or embossed regions or layers, color changing coatings made up of color shift, iridescent, liquid crystal, photochromic and/or thermochromic materials, coatings of luminescent and/or magnetic materials, holographic and/or diffractive security features, and micro-optic security features. In a preferred embodiment, the security device provides security such that a security or value document can be readily authenticated. In one embodiment the security device comprises an array of focusing elements and an array of image icons where the array of focusing elements and image icons are arranged such that one or more synthetic images are provided. Focusing elements suitable here include both lenticular lenses and non-cylindrical lenses (i.e., micro-lenses).
In an exemplary embodiment, the security device is a micro-lens based security device. Such devices generally comprise (a) a light-transmitting polymeric substrate, (b) an arrangement of micro-sized image icons located on or within the polymeric substrate, and (c) an arrangement of focusing elements (e.g., microlenses). The image icon and focusing element arrangements are configured such that when the arrangement of image icons is viewed through the arrangement of focusing elements, one or more synthetic images are projected. These projected images may show a number of different optical effects. Material constructions capable of presenting such effects are described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,468,842 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,738,175 to Steenblik et al., U.S. Pat. No. 7,830,627 to Commander et al., U.S. Pat. No. 8,149,511 to Kaule et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 8,878,844 to Kaule et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 8,786,521 to Kaule et al.; European Patent No. 2162294 to Kaule et al.; and European Patent Application No. 08759342.2 (or European Publication No. 2164713) to Kaule. These references are hereby incorporated in their entirety.
In a preferred embodiment, the security device that is being surface applied by the present inventive method includes, but is not limited to, micro-optic security devices such as the MOTION™ micro-optic security device, which is described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 7,333,268, the RAPID™ micro-optic security device, holographic security devices (e.g., metalized holographic devices). These devices are available from Crane Currency US, LLC of Massachusetts, USA. Other suitable devices include, but are not limited to optically variable devices (OVDs) such as the KINEGRAM™ optical data carrier, and color-shift security devices.
While the security device may be presented in various forms to be introduced to the fibrous web, it has been found most advantageous to provide the security device in the form of a continuous web. By providing the security device in the form of a continuous web, it has been found that the security device can be introduced to the fibrous web in a continuous manner. The continuous web is then sectioned or divided up into a plurality of discontinuous security devices. The sectioning of the continuous web into discontinuous security devices can be accomplished by various cutting and/or punching methods. In a preferred embodiment, the method is an in-line application process of the plurality of discontinuous security devices, without the use of a carrier film, to the fibrous web during manufacture on a paper machine. This method comprises providing the security device in the form of a continuous web; cutting or punching the continuous web in a continuous manner to form the discontinuous security devices, each having a desired shape and size; and then applying the discontinuous security devices in a continuous manner onto the fibrous web during paper manufacturing.
It is contemplated herein that additional security devices may be applied to the fibrous sheet material; either by surface application, partial embedment or total embedment. For example, in one embodiment, an additional security device is applied to the surface of the fibrous sheet material. Said additional device may be introduced to the fibrous web before the surface applied security device is introduced or applied after the surface applied security device is introduced. The additional security device may be different from or similar to the surface applied security device. For example, in one embodiment when one of the discontinuous security devices has a thickness of 25 μm or less, it is contemplated that it is introduced to the fibrous web when the moisture content is less than 60%; preferably ranges from about 90% to 0% by weight. For example, the security device is introduced to the fibrous web as it travels through the paper machine between the first dryer section and the size press and optionally rewetted to increase the water and/or moisture content to between about 4% and about 7%.
The security devices may take various sizes, shapes, or colors. For instance, it is contemplated that the security device, in the form of the discontinuous security device, takes the non-limiting form of a stripe, a band, a thread, a ribbon or a patch. These devices may be from about 2 to about 25 millimeters (mm) (preferably, from about 6 to about 12 mm) in total width, and from about 10 to about 50 microns (preferably, from about 20 to about 40 microns) in total thickness. In a preferred embodiment, the security device is a stripe or patch. A “stripe,” as used herein, refers to a security device having a longitudinal length dimension that is substantially longer than its latitudinal width dimension. A “patch,” by contrast, may have substantially equivalent longitudinal and latitudinal lengths and may have uniform or various non-uniform shapes. Various shapes and sizes of stripes and patches are contemplated herein. However, while a stripe or patch may extend to the edge of a fibrous sheet material or a resulting document, in a preferred embodiment, the stripe or patch is located within the perimeter of the fibrous sheet material or document and does not extend to the edge of the sheet material or document.
As noted, various sizes of security devices are contemplated as suitable for the inventive method and fibrous sheet material. In one embodiment, the size ranges from about 5 to about 75 millimeters (mm), preferably from about 15 mm to about 40 mm in total length and; from about 2 mm to about 50 mm, preferably from about 6 mm to about 25 mm in total width; and from about 10 to about 50 microns, preferably from about 15 microns to about 40 microns in total thickness. All ranges noted herein include all subranges, including integers and fractions.
As noted, various shapes are also contemplated for the security devices; for example, patches, stripes, or threads, geometric shapes such as stars, parallelograms, polygonal (e.g., hexagons, octagons, etc.) shapes, numbers, letters and various symbols. Simple and complex non-geometric designs are also contemplated as suitable. These shapes and designs can be cut with a rotary die process.
In one embodiment of the inventive method, the security device is introduced into the forming fibrous web such that it is in register with at least one other feature on or in the substrate of the fibrous web, the fibrous sheet material or the resulting document. In certain embodiments, the security device is introduced such that a particular feature within the security device is in register with another feature in the fibrous web, the resulting fibrous sheet material or document. The at least one other feature can be varied as necessary relative to the application. For example, the at least one other feature is a watermark, a printed image, a relief structure, another security device, or a paper-borne feature. In introducing the security device to the fibrous web such that it is in register, it is contemplated that the security device, first presented in the form of a continuous web, is delivered to a piece of equipment or system (referred to herein as the intro-device) that can be used to cut/punch the continuous web into discontinuous security devices. While it is possible to use a separate device to cut then apply the security device to the fibrous web, it is preferred that the system used for forming the discontinuous security devices is also used for applying the security devices into or onto the fibrous web. With a single device, it is possible to more precisely apply the security device in register since it requires less moving parts.
In the preferred embodiment wherein the continuous web is cut into discontinuous security devices that are then introduced into or onto the fibrous web by the same intro-device, it is also contemplated that the placement of the security device is adjustable by the intro-device such that a mis-registered (misaligned with the at least one other feature) security device can be adjusted in a continuous manner to be in register. By using a single intro-device to cut, apply and adjust registration in situ with the paper manufacturing process, additional processing to adjust the placement is rendered unnecessary. For example, the registered application and adjustment during the paper manufacturing process eliminates the need for secondary processing of the resulting sheet material or document prior to printing.
Suitable intro-devices will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in hindsight of the instant disclosure. However, in a preferred embodiment, the intro-device is a system that employs either an optical or a fiber-density sensor that checks the registration between the security device and the at least one other feature in the fibrous web, the fibrous material or the resulting document. In view of the identified or calculated location of the security device or the relative locations of the security device and the at least one other feature, the intro-device is used to make adjustments in the placement of the security device. To make such adjustments the intro-device uses a variable speed advancing device (e.g., electric servomechanism with servo drive) that controls the tension on the continuous web such that the discontinuous security device can be applied in register as desired. The point of introduction of the security device is thereby continuously adjusted by modulating a tension on the continuous web. Alternatively, the intro-device may be a rotary die cut and transfer device such as that used in the label industry to apply labels in registration.
In another aspect of the invention, a fibrous sheet material is provided. The fibrous sheet material as described herein results from further processing of the fibrous web after the security device has been introduced thereto. Said further processing optionally includes a drying step that is applied before or after pressing the security device into the fibrous web. The pressing of the security device into the fibrous web produces a fibrous sheet material having a fibrous bulk-region and a fibrous sub-region.
The resulting fibrous sheet material, which has opposing surfaces and a recess in one opposing surface, comprises: a surface applied security device disposed in the recess; a fibrous sub-region disposed beneath the recess; a fibrous bulk-region disposed next to the security device (disposed in the recess) and the sub-region; and an interface between the security device and at least one surface of the fibrous sheet material. As used herein, reference to a bulk-region being next to the security device indicates that in a cross-sectional view the bulk-region is the region adjacent to the security device along the x-axis. As used herein, reference to a sub-region being beneath the security device indicates that in a cross-sectional view the sub-region is the region along the y-axis that at least part of the security device covers. The sub-region has a thickness that is less than the thickness of the bulk-region such that the surface applied security device has a caliper differential that is less than 80% of the thickness of the security device or as described above in the specified ranges and implied subranges.
In one embodiment, fibers in the sub-region are further consolidated such that the amount of fibers in the sub-region is substantially equivalent to fibers in at least the immediate adjoining bulk-region. In one other embodiment, the amount of fibers in the sub-region is substantially equivalent to the amount of fibers in the bulk-region. As used herein, the term “substantially equivalent”, as reference to the amount of fibers in the bulk- and sub-regions, means that the amount of fibers in each region are within 80% to 100% of the amount in the other; preferably 90% to 100% as characterized by the grams per square meter (gsm) of fibers. In a preferred embodiment, the amount of fibers in the sub-region is equivalent to an amount ranging from 80% to about 100% of the bulk-region; particularly the immediate adjoining bulk-region.
As noted herein, various thicknesses may be attributed to a suitable security device. Consequently, various caliper differentials are also contemplated. In one embodiment of the fibrous sheet material, the security device has a thickness ranging from about 10 to about 75 microns. The caliper differential range from about −10 to about 30 microns; preferably from 0 to about 25 microns; preferably from about 0 to about 15 μm.
In one embodiment, the fibrous sheet material demonstrates at least one of (1) improved durability, (2) acceptable ink adhesion, (3) high cross-direction (CD) tensile strength, or (4) reduced backside show-through. As used herein, improved durability is characterized by at least one of (a) minimal or reduced damage at the interface when compared to such sheet materials that are produced when the fibrous web is not sufficiently consolidated or (b) almost no hinge effect. These effects can be quantified or qualified by known industry techniques that simulate the effects of circulation of the documents. For example, the circulation of a banknote can be simulated with a durability test. One such suitable durability test is the “Circulation Simulation” Test (CST). This is a wear and tear test designed to approximate the mechanical and optical degradation experienced by a banknote through its circulation lifecycle. This test is performed by attaching rubber grommets, each weighing 7.5 grams, to the four corners of a banknote, and then placing the weighted banknote in a rock tumbler at a speed calibrated to 60 revolutions per minute (RPM) for a fixed duration of 30 minutes (one (1) cycle). The tumbling action experienced by the weighted banknote induces mechanical and optical degradation. Controlled amounts of liquid and solid soiling agents (e.g., soybean oil and clay) are then added to the rock tumbler to simulate the influence of oils and dirt which a banknote would typically come in contact with during its lifecycle. The banknote is tested before and after each round of simulated degradation for mechanical deterioration (e.g., surface and edge damage in the form of holes, tears, cuts, hinges, separated parts and ragged uneven edges, loss of tensile strength, fold endurance, tear resistance, and perforation resistance), optical deterioration (e.g., deterioration in printing ink color properties) and soiling. Hinge effects and tearing at the interface are examples of mechanical degradation that are particularly suited for this durability test.
Tests for acceptable ink adhesions are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For example, ink set-off, which is the amount of ink that is transferred from one sheet to another in a stacked formation of multiple fibrous sheet materials or documents, can be quantitatively measured by methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art. Similarly, tensile strength and backside show-through can be quantified by methods known to those of ordinary skill in the art. For instance, show-through can be quantified by known light reflectance or transmittance tests. In CD tensile strength tests using, for example, an INSTRON® tension tester, or pull tester, and as shown in
The fibrous sheet material, as noted, has a fibrous sub-region beneath the security device and a fibrous bulk-region next to the security device and sub-region. Because the security device was introduced when the fibrous web was sufficiently consolidated, the fibers in the region of the fibrous web which corresponds to the sub-region in the sheet material were not displaced in an amount that results in the identified disadvantages. As such, the amount of fibers in the fibrous sub-region is substantially equivalent to the amount of fibers in at least the immediate adjoining bulk-region. As used herein, the term “immediate adjoining bulk-region” refers to a region in the bulk region that abuts the sub-region and the recessed portion of the security device. This immediate adjoining bulk region extends radially from the recessed portion and the sub-region to a distance in the cross-sectional x-axis that is equivalent to the x-axis length of the sub-region. In view of the volume difference between the immediate adjoining bulk-region and the sub-region, the density of fibers in the sub-region is greater than the density of fibers in the immediate adjoining bulk region. The amount of fibers in the immediate bulk-region and sub-region are substantially equivalent such that given the difference in volume of the two regions, the density in the sub-region is greater than the density in the immediate adjoining bulk-region. In one exemplary embodiment, the amount of fibers in the bulk region ranges from 88.55 gsm to 90.15 gsm, while the amount of fibers in the sub-region ranges from 87.26 gsm to 90.69 gsm. As used herein, “density” refers to the average amount of fibers in a volume.
As noted herein, security devices suitable for the present invention are numerous. However, in one embodiment, the fibrous sheet material comprises a security device having an array of cylindrical and/or non-cylindrical focusing elements, and an array of image icons that optically interact with the focusing elements to produce at least one synthetic image. In preferred embodiments the focusing elements are exclusively either cylindrical lenses or non-cylindrical lenses (e.g., micro-lenses). However, it is contemplated herein that the array of lenses comprises a blend of both in various ratios.
As noted herein, the security device can be in the form of stripe or patch or other shapes or geometries. In one embodiment the security device is present in the sheet material in register with at least one other feature in the sheet material. Suitable other features are described herein.
In another aspect, the invention is a document comprising the fibrous sheet material. Various documents are contemplated by the present invention. For example, suitable documents include, but are not limited to, banknotes, bonds, checks, traveler's checks, identification cards, lottery tickets, passports, postage stamps, stock certificates, as well as non-security documents such as stationery items and labels and items used for aesthetics. A plurality of security devices may be introduced into the fibrous web and consequently a plurality of security devices can be found applied to the fibrous sheet material and any resulting document. Alternatively, in one embodiment, the document comprises at least one surface applied security device and at least one other security device such as an embedded or partially embedded security device or security feature. The surface applied security device can be in register with other features of the document such as other security devices or security or decorative features.
Fibrous sheet materials suitable for use in the present invention are paper or paper-like sheet materials. These sheet materials, which are single or multi-ply sheet materials, may be made from a range of fiber types including synthetic or natural fibers or a mixture of both. For example, these sheet materials may be made from fibers such as abaca, cotton, linen, wood pulp, and blends thereof. As is well known to those skilled in the art, cotton and cotton/linen or cotton/synthetic fiber blends are preferred for banknotes, while wood pulp is commonly used in non-banknote security documents.
As noted above, security devices contemplated for use with the present invention may take a number of different forms including, but not limited to, stripes, bands, threads, ribbons, or patches (e.g., micro-lens based, holographic and/or color shift security threads).
Further understanding of the claimed invention will be aided by the following description of figures that represent exemplary embodiments.
Conventional techniques are depicted in
Disadvantages are also found in the conventional embodiment shown in
At least one of these disadvantages is addressed by the present invention.
The security device (41) may be introduced to the fibrous web (49) using various methods and techniques. In a preferred embodiment, which is shown in
In a first comparative example, a fibrous sheet material is made according to the conventional wet stage process where the security device is introduced to a fibrous web during the paper manufacturing process when the water and/or moisture content of the fibrous web is greater than 98%. As a result of fiber displacement, fibers in the hinge area (74) and in the sub-region are displaced resulting in decreased interaction of the security device (71) and the fibrous substrate (78) of the fibrous sheet material (70) in those areas. The fibrous sheet material (70) formed according to this process is depicted in
Moreover, the surface applied security device demonstrated backside show-through. A panel of five (5) persons (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5) were asked to rate the degree of backside show-through from 1 to 5, with 5 having the highest show-through and 1 having the least show-through. Panelists P1 and P4 rated the backside show-through as 4; panelist P2, P3 and P5 rated the backside show-through as 5.
Cross-directional (CD) tensile strength of the fibrous sheet material was also measured using an INSTRON® tension tester, model 5965. A paper sample is cut to a dimension of 125 mm wide by 15 mm high with the thread running vertically through the center of the sample. The sample is then placed in the jaws of the Instron (model 5965) tensile tester with the jaws at a set with a 40 mm spacing between them and the thread centered in the gap. The sample is then elongated at a rate of 38 mm/minute until the sample breaks. This process is repeated 5 times and the average of the 5 values is the reported result of the test. The results showed that the CD tensile strength ranged from 5.4 to 6.3 kg.
In a first inventive example, a fibrous sheet material (80) is made according to the invention disclosed herein where the security device (81) is introduced to a fibrous web during the paper manufacturing process when the moisture content of the fibrous web is less than 98%. As a result of reduced fiber displacement from the hinge area and increased fiber consolidation in the sub-region, there is sufficient interaction of the security device (81) with the substrate (88) of the fibrous sheet material (80). The fibrous sheet material (80) formed according to this process is depicted in
Moreover, the surface applied security device (81) demonstrated less backside show-through compared to comparative example 1. A panel of five (5) persons (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5) were asked to rate the degree of backside show-through from 1 to 5, with 5 having the highest show-through and 1 having the least show-through. Panelist P2 rated the backside show-through as 1; panelist P1, P3, P4 and P5 rated the backside show-through as 2.
Cross-directional (CD) tensile strength of the fibrous sheet material (80) was also measured using an INSTRON® tension tester, model 5965. The same process as above was repeated here. The results showed that the CD tensile strength was better than that demonstrated in comparative example 1. Results of the comparative example are depicted as the first bars (>98% water) in
In a second comparative example, a fibrous sheet material (90) is made according to the conventional wet stage process where the security device is introduced to a fibrous web during the paper manufacturing process when the moisture content of the fibrous web is greater than 98%. As a result of fiber displacement, fibers in the hinge area and in the sub-region are displaced during introduction of the security device (91) resulting in decreased interaction of the security device (91) and the substrate (98) of the fibrous sheet material (90) in those areas. The fibrous sheet material (90) formed according to this process is depicted in
Moreover, the surface applied security device (91) demonstrated backside show-through. A panel of five (5) persons (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5) were asked to rate the degree of backside show-through from 1 to 5, with 5 having the highest show-through and 1 having the least show-through. Panelists P1 and P5 rated the backside show-through as 5; panelist P2, P3 and P4 rated the backside show-through as 4.
In a second inventive example, a fibrous sheet material (100) is made according to the invention disclosed herein where the security device (101) is introduced to a fibrous web during the paper manufacturing process when the moisture content of the fibrous web is less than 98%. As a result of reduced fiber displacement from the hinge area and increased fiber consolidation in the sub-region, relative to that in comparative example 1, there is sufficient interaction of the security device with the substrate (108) of the fibrous sheet material (100). The fibrous sheet material (100) formed according to this process is depicted in
Moreover, the surface applied security device (101) demonstrated less backside show-through compared to comparative example 2. A panel of five (5) persons (P1, P2, P3, P4, P5) were asked to rate the degree of backside show-through from 1 to 5, with 5 having the highest show-through and 1 having the least show-through. Panelist P1 rated the backside show-through as 2; P2, P4 and P5 rated the backside show-through as 1; and panelist P3 rated the backside show-through as 3.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been described above it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not limitation. Thus, the breadth and scope of the present invention should not be limited by any of the exemplary embodiments.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/114,699, filed Feb. 11, 2015, which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
992151 | Berthon | May 1911 | A |
1824353 | Jensen | Sep 1931 | A |
1849036 | Ernst | Mar 1932 | A |
1942841 | Shimizu | Jan 1934 | A |
2268351 | Tanaka | Dec 1941 | A |
2355902 | Berg | Aug 1944 | A |
2432896 | Hotchner | Dec 1947 | A |
2888855 | Tanaka | Jun 1959 | A |
2992103 | Land et al. | Jul 1961 | A |
3122853 | Koonz et al. | Mar 1964 | A |
3241429 | Rice et al. | Mar 1966 | A |
3264164 | Jerothe et al. | Aug 1966 | A |
3312006 | Rowland | Apr 1967 | A |
3357772 | Rowland | Dec 1967 | A |
3357773 | Rowland | Dec 1967 | A |
3463581 | Clay | Aug 1969 | A |
3609035 | Ataka | Sep 1971 | A |
3643361 | Eaves | Feb 1972 | A |
3704068 | Waly | Nov 1972 | A |
3801183 | Sevelin et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3811213 | Eaves | May 1974 | A |
3887742 | Reinnagel | Jun 1975 | A |
4025673 | Reinnagel | May 1977 | A |
4073650 | Yevick | Feb 1978 | A |
4082426 | Brown | Apr 1978 | A |
4185191 | Stauffer | Jan 1980 | A |
4345833 | Siegmund | Aug 1982 | A |
4417784 | Knop et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4498736 | Griffin | Feb 1985 | A |
4507349 | Fromson et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4519632 | Parkinson et al. | May 1985 | A |
4534398 | Crane | Aug 1985 | A |
4634220 | Hockert et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4645301 | Orensteen et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4662651 | Mowry, Jr. | May 1987 | A |
4688894 | Hockert | Aug 1987 | A |
4691993 | Porter et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4756972 | Kloosterboer et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4765656 | Becker et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4814594 | Drexler | Mar 1989 | A |
4892336 | Kaule et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4892385 | Webster, Jr. et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4920039 | Fotland et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4935335 | Fotland | Jun 1990 | A |
4988126 | Heckenkamp et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
5044707 | Mallik | Sep 1991 | A |
5074649 | Hamanaka | Dec 1991 | A |
5085514 | Mallik et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5135262 | Smith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5142383 | Mallik | Aug 1992 | A |
5211424 | Bliss | May 1993 | A |
5215864 | Laakmann | Jun 1993 | A |
5232764 | Oshima | Aug 1993 | A |
5254390 | Lu | Oct 1993 | A |
5282650 | Smith et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5359454 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5384861 | Mattson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5393099 | D'Amato | Feb 1995 | A |
5393590 | Caspari | Feb 1995 | A |
5413839 | Chatwin et al. | May 1995 | A |
5433807 | Heckenkamp et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5438928 | Chatwin et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5442482 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5449200 | Andric et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5460679 | Abdel-Kader | Oct 1995 | A |
5461495 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464690 | Boswell | Nov 1995 | A |
5468540 | Lu | Nov 1995 | A |
5479507 | Anderson | Dec 1995 | A |
5492370 | Chatwin et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5503902 | Steenblik et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5538753 | Antes et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5543942 | Mizuguchi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5555476 | Suzuki et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5567276 | Boehm et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568313 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574083 | Brown et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5575507 | Yamauchi et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5598281 | Zimmerman et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5623347 | Pizzanelli | Apr 1997 | A |
5623368 | Calderini et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5626969 | Joson | May 1997 | A |
5631039 | Knight et al. | May 1997 | A |
5639126 | Dames et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642226 | Rosenthal | Jun 1997 | A |
5643678 | Boswell | Jul 1997 | A |
5670003 | Boswell | Sep 1997 | A |
5670096 | Lu | Sep 1997 | A |
5674580 | Boswell | Oct 1997 | A |
5688587 | Burchard et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5695346 | Sekiguchi et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5712731 | Drinkwater et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5723200 | Oshima et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731064 | Süss | Mar 1998 | A |
5737126 | Lawandy | Apr 1998 | A |
5753349 | Boswell | May 1998 | A |
5759683 | Boswell | Jun 1998 | A |
5763349 | Zandona | Jun 1998 | A |
5783017 | Boswell | Jul 1998 | A |
5783275 | Mück et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800907 | Yumoto | Sep 1998 | A |
5810957 | Boswell | Sep 1998 | A |
5812313 | Johansen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5886798 | Staub et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5933276 | Magee | Aug 1999 | A |
5949420 | Terlutter | Sep 1999 | A |
5995638 | Amidror et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6030691 | Burchard et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6036230 | Farber | Mar 2000 | A |
6036233 | Braun et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6060143 | Tompkin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6084713 | Rosenthal | Jul 2000 | A |
6089614 | Howland et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6106950 | Searle et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6176582 | Grasnick | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177953 | Vachette et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6179338 | Bergmann et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195150 | Silverbrook | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6249588 | Amidror et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256149 | Rolfe | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6256150 | Rosenthal | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6283509 | Braun et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6288842 | Florczak et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6297911 | Nishikawa et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301363 | Mowry, Jr. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302989 | Kaule | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328342 | Belousov et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329040 | Oshima et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6329987 | Gottfried et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6345104 | Rhoads | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6348999 | Summersgill et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6350036 | Hannington et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6369947 | Staub et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6373965 | Liang | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6381071 | Dona et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6404555 | Nishikawa | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405464 | Gulkick, Jr. et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414794 | Rosenthal | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424467 | Goggins | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6433844 | Li | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6450540 | Kim | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467810 | Taylor et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6473238 | Daniell | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6483644 | Gottfried et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6500526 | Hannington | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6521324 | Debe et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6542646 | Bar-Yona | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558009 | Hannington et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6587276 | Daniell | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6616803 | Isherwood et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618201 | Nishikawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6641270 | Hannington et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671095 | Summersgill et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6712399 | Drinkwater et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721101 | Daniell | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6724536 | Magee | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6726858 | Andrews | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6751024 | Rosenthal | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6761377 | Taylor et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6795250 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6803088 | Kaminsky et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6819775 | Amidror et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6833960 | Scarbrough et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6856462 | Scarbrough et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870681 | Magee | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6900944 | Tomczyk | May 2005 | B2 |
6926764 | Bleikolm et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6935756 | Sewall et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7030997 | Neureuther et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7058202 | Amidror | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7068434 | Florczak et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7114750 | Alasia et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7194105 | Hersch et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7246824 | Hudson | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254265 | Naske et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7255911 | Lutz et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7288320 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7333268 | Steenblik et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336422 | Dunn et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7359120 | Raymond et al. | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7372631 | Ozawa | May 2008 | B2 |
7389939 | Jones et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7422781 | Gosselin | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7457038 | Dolgoff | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7457039 | Raymond et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468842 | Steenblik et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7504147 | Hannington | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7545567 | Tomczyk | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7609450 | Niemuth | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7630954 | Adamczyk et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7686187 | Pottish et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7712623 | Wentz et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7719733 | Schilling et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7738175 | Steenblik et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7744002 | Jones et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751608 | Hersch et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7762591 | Schilling et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763179 | Levy et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7812935 | Cowburn et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7820269 | Staub et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7830627 | Commander et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849993 | Finkenzeller et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
3027093 | Commander et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
8057980 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8111463 | Endle et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8149511 | Kaule et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8241732 | Hansen et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8284492 | Crane et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8367452 | Soma et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8514492 | Schilling et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8528941 | Dörfler et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8537470 | Endle et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8557369 | Hoffmüller et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8693101 | Tomczyk et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8867134 | Steenblik et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8908276 | Holmes | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9802437 | Holmes | Oct 2017 | B2 |
20010048968 | Cox et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020014967 | Crane et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020114078 | Halle et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020167485 | Hedrick | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020185857 | Taylor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030031861 | Reiter et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030112523 | Daniell | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030157211 | Tsunetomo et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030179364 | Steenblik et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183695 | Labrec et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030228014 | Alasia et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232179 | Steenblik et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030234294 | Uchihiro et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040020086 | Hudson | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040022967 | Lutz et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040065743 | Doublet | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100707 | Kay et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040140665 | Scarborough et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040209049 | Bak | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050094274 | Souparis | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104364 | Keller et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050161501 | Giering et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180020 | Steenblik et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050247794 | Jones et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060003295 | Hersch et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060011449 | Knoll | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060017979 | Goggins | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060018021 | Tomkins et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060061267 | Yamasaki et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060227427 | Dolgoff | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070058260 | Steenblik et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070092680 | Chaffins et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070164555 | Mang et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070183045 | Schilling et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070183047 | Phillips et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070273143 | Crane et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070284546 | Ryzi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070291362 | Hill et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080130018 | Steenblik et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080143095 | Isherwood et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080160226 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080182084 | Tompkin et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090008923 | Kaule et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090061159 | Staub et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090243278 | Camus | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090261572 | Bleikolm et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090290221 | Hansen et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090310470 | Yrjonen | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090315316 | Staub et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100001508 | Tompkin et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018644 | Sacks et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100045024 | Attner et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100068459 | Wang et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100084851 | Schilling | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100103528 | Endle et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100109317 | Huffmuller et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100177094 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100182221 | Kaule et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100194532 | Kaule | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100208036 | Kaule | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100277805 | Schilling et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100308571 | Steenblik et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100328922 | Peters et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110017498 | Lauffer et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019283 | Steenblik et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110045255 | Jones et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110056638 | Rosset | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110179631 | Gates et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120019607 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120033305 | Moon et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120091703 | Maguire et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120098249 | Rahm et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120194916 | Cape et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120243744 | Camus et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130003354 | Meis et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130010048 | Dunn et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130038942 | Holmes | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130044362 | Commander et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130154250 | Dunn et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130154251 | Jolic | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140174306 | Wening et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140175785 | Kaule et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140353959 | Lochbihler | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140367957 | Jordan | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150152602 | Blake et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20160101643 | Cape et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160176221 | Holmes | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160257159 | Attner et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160325577 | Jordan | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170015129 | Jordan | Jan 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009278275 | Jul 2012 | AU |
2741298 | Apr 2010 | CA |
1102865 | May 1995 | CN |
1126970 | Nov 2003 | CN |
1950570 | Apr 2007 | CN |
101678664 | Mar 2010 | CN |
19804858 | Aug 1999 | DE |
19932240 | Jan 2001 | DE |
10100692 | Aug 2004 | DE |
0090130 | Oct 1983 | EP |
0092691 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0118222 | Sep 1984 | EP |
0156460 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0203752 | Dec 1986 | EP |
0253089 | Jan 1988 | EP |
0318717 | Jun 1989 | EP |
0415230 | Mar 1991 | EP |
0319157 | Jul 1992 | EP |
0801324 | Oct 1997 | EP |
0887699 | Dec 1998 | EP |
0930174 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0997750 | May 2000 | EP |
1356952 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1002640 | May 2004 | EP |
1538554 | Jun 2005 | EP |
1354925 | Apr 2006 | EP |
1659449 | May 2006 | EP |
1743778 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1801636 | Jun 2007 | EP |
1876028 | Jan 2008 | EP |
1897700 | Mar 2008 | EP |
1931827 | Jan 2009 | EP |
2335937 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2338682 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2162294 | Mar 2012 | EP |
2803939 | Jul 2001 | FR |
2952194 | May 2011 | FR |
1095286 | Dec 1967 | GB |
2103669 | Feb 1983 | GB |
2168372 | Jun 1986 | GB |
2227451 | Jan 1990 | GB |
2362493 | Nov 2001 | GB |
2395724 | Jun 2004 | GB |
2433470 | Jun 2007 | GB |
2490780 | Nov 2012 | GB |
41-004953 | Mar 1941 | JP |
46-022600 | Jun 1971 | JP |
04-234699 | Aug 1992 | JP |
H05-508119 | Nov 1993 | JP |
10-035083 | Feb 1998 | JP |
10-039108 | Feb 1998 | JP |
11-501590 | Feb 1999 | JP |
11-189000 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2000-056103 | Feb 2000 | JP |
2000-233563 | Aug 2000 | JP |
2000-256994 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-055000 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001-516899 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2001-324949 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2003-039583 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003-165289 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2003-528349 | Sep 2003 | JP |
2003-326876 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2004-262144 | Sep 2004 | JP |
2004-317636 | Nov 2004 | JP |
2005-193501 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2009-274293 | Nov 2009 | JP |
2011-502811 | Jan 2011 | JP |
10-0194536 | Jun 1999 | KR |
2002170350000 | Mar 2001 | KR |
2003119050000 | May 2003 | KR |
1005443000000 | Jan 2006 | KR |
1005613210000 | Mar 2006 | KR |
10-2008-0048578 | Jun 2008 | KR |
2111125 | May 1998 | RU |
2245566 | Jan 2005 | RU |
2010101854 | Jul 2011 | RU |
575740 | Feb 2004 | TW |
WO 1992008998 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 1992019994 | Nov 1992 | WO |
WO 1993024332 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 1996035971 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO 1997019820 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 1997044769 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 1998013211 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 1998015418 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO 1998026373 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 1999014725 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO 1999023513 | May 1999 | WO |
WO 1999026793 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO 1999066356 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 2001007268 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2001011591 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2001039138 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 2001053113 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 2001063341 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 2001071410 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 2002040291 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2002043012 | May 2002 | WO |
WO 2002101669 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO 2003005075 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003007276 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2003022598 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2003053713 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003061980 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003061983 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2003082598 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2003098188 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004022355 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO 2004036507 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004087430 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005106601 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006029744 | Mar 2006 | WO |
WO 2007076952 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2007133613 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2009000527 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009000528 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009000529 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009000530 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO 2009118946 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2009121784 | Oct 2009 | WO |
WO 2010015383 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010094691 | Aug 2010 | WO |
WO 2010099571 | Sep 2010 | WO |
WO 2010136339 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011015384 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011019912 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011044704 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO 2011051669 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2011122943 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012027779 | May 2011 | WO |
WO 2012103441 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011107793 | Sep 2011 | WO |
WO 2013028534 | Feb 2013 | WO |
WO 2013093848 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2013098513 | Jul 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Article: “Spherical Lenses” (Jan. 18, 2009); pp. 1-12; retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.physicsinsights.org/simple_optics_spherical_lenses-1.html. |
Drinkwater, K. John, et al., “Development and applications of Diffractive Optical Security Devices for Banknotes and High Value Documents”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 66-77, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Fletcher, D.A., et al., “Near-field infrared imaging with a microfabricated solid immersion lens”, Applied Physics Letters, Oct. 2, 2000, pp. 2109-2111, vol. 77, No. 14. |
Gale, M. T., et al., Chapter 6—Replication, Micro Optics: Elements, Systems and Applications, 1997, pp. 153-177. |
Hardwick, Bruce and Ghioghiu Ana, “Guardian Substrate As an Optical Medium for Security Devices”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 176-179, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Hutley, M.C., et al., “The Moiré Magnifier”, Pure Appl. Opt. 3, 1994, pp. 133-142, IOP Publishing Ltd., UK. |
Hutley, M.C., “Integral Photography, Superlenses and the Moiré Magnifier”, European Optical Society, 1993, pp. 72-75, vol. 2, UK. |
Hutley, M., et al., “Microlens Arrays”, Physics World, Jul. 1991, pp. 27-32. |
Kamal, H., et al., “Properties of Moiré Magnifiers”, Opt. Eng., Nov. 1998, pp. 3007-3014, vol. 37, No. 11. |
Leech, Patrick W., et al., Printing via hot embossing of optically variable images in thermoplastic acrylic lacquer, Microelectronic Engineering, 2006, pp. 1961-1965, vol. 83, No. 10, Elsevier Publishers BV, Amsterdam, NL. |
Lippmann, G., “Photgraphie—Épreuves Réversibles, Photographies Intégrals”, Académie des Sciences, 1908, pp. 446-451, vol. 146, Paris. |
Liu, S., et al., “Artistic Effect and Application of Moiré Patterns in Security Holograms”, Applied Optics, Aug. 1995, pp. 4700-4702, vol. 34, No. 22. |
Phillips, Roger W., et al., Security Enhancement of Holograms with Interference Coatings, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 304-316, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Steenblik, Richard A., et al., UNISON Micro-optic Security Film, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, 2004, pp. 321-327, SPIE vol. 5310, San Jose, CA. |
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 1994, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA. |
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 1998, 2nd edition, pp. 232-235, 240-241 and 320-321, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA (ISBN 0-89006-982-4). |
Van Renesse, Rudolf L., Optical Document Security, 2005, 3rd edition, pp. 62-169, Artech House Inc., Norwood, MA (ISBN 1-58053-258-6). |
Wolpert, Gary R., Design and development of an effective optical variable device based security system Incorporating additional synergistic security technologies, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques III, 2000, pp. 55-61, SPIE vol. 3973, San Jose, CA. |
Zhang, X., et al., “Concealed Holographic Coding for Security Applications by Using a Moiré Technique”, Applied Optics, Nov. 1997, pp. 8096-8097, vol. 36, No. 31. |
Amidror, “A Generalized Fourier-Based Method for the Analysis of 2D Moiré Envelope-Forms in Screen Superpositions”, Journal of Modern Optics (London, GB), vol. 41, No. 9, Sep. 1, 1994, pp. 1837-1862, ISSN: 0950-0340. |
Dunn, et al., “Three-Dimensional Virtual Images for Security Applications”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, (published Jun. 3, 2004), Proc. SPIE 5310. |
Muke, “Embossing of Optical Document Security Devices”, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques V, (published Jun. 3, 2004), Proc. SPIE 5310. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160229215 A1 | Aug 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62114699 | Feb 2015 | US |