Patent Application
20080226105
This application claims priority of German application No. 10 2006 046 230.0 filed Sep. 29, 2006, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
The present invention relates to a method for adjusting a hearing apparatus by automatically classifying a hearing situation, manually adjusting a parameter of a signal processing facility of the hearing apparatus and automatically learning the adjusted parameter for the current hearing situation. Furthermore, the present invention relates to a corresponding hearing apparatus. The term hearing apparatus is understood here to mean any portable and non-portable device for acoustic communication, in particular a hearing device, a head set and earphones.
Hearing devices are portable hearing apparatuses which are used to supply the hard-of-hearing. To accommodate the numerous individual requirements, different configurations of hearing devices such as behind-the-ear hearing devices (BTE), in-the-ear hearing devices (ITE), concha hearing devices, are provided. The hearing devices designed by way of example are worn on the outer ear or in the auditory canal. Furthermore, bone conduction hearing aids, implantable or vibrotactile hearing aids are also available on the market. The damaged hearing is herewith either stimulated mechanically or electrically.
Essential components of the hearing devices include in principal an input converter, an amplifier and an output converter. The input converter is generally a receiving transducer, e.g. a microphone and/or an electromagnetic receiver, e.g. an induction coil. The output converter is mostly realized as an electroacoustic converter, e.g. a miniature loudspeaker, or as an electromechanical converter, e.g. a bone conduction receiver. The amplifier is usually integrated into a signal processing unit. This main configuration is shown in the example in
The large number of parameters in a hearing device signal processing and the similarly large number of the most varied hearing situations as well as the subjective hearing sensitivity of a hearing device wearer require an individual adjustment of the hearing device parameters to the individual and the corresponding situation. As a detailed adjustment is not possible in a special situation in a short adjustment session, it is useful if the user is able to express their views on a preferred adjustment when he/she desires a change. This is achieved by means of training, by the user specifying a desired hearing experience by way of program selector switches and volume control. The device memorizes this in order to behave as desired the next time this situation occurs.
There is nevertheless uncertainty as to when and for how long this desired hearing experience is valid. It is also questionable whether and when another change is to be expected. By way of example, it is not known whether the current desired hearing experience relates to an instant (e.g. the slamming of a door was perceived as too loud) or to the last five minutes.
In current approaches for training hearing device-specific parameters, it is always presupposed that the user informs the hearing system as to whether his/her decision is “final”. In this context, the publication US 2005/0129262 A1 discloses a hearing device which can be automatically adjusted and trained to the acoustic situations. A so-called “vote” button is to be activated there in order to complete one learning step. A button activation of this type can possibly be very laborious or easily forgotten.
The object of the present invention thus consists in developing the training of a hearing apparatus in a more user-friendly fashion.
In accordance with the invention, this object is achieved by a method for adjusting a hearing apparatus by automatically classifying a hearing situation, adjusting a parameter of a signal processing facility of the hearing apparatus and automatically learning the adjusted parameter for the current hearings situation, as well as temporally monitoring the steps “classifying” and “adjusting” and only triggering the automatic learning when the classified hearing situation and the adjustment have not modified a predetermined time period.
Furthermore, provision is made in accordance with the invention for a hearing apparatus with a classification facility for classifying a hearing situation, a signal processing facility, which is connected to the classification facility, an adjustment facility for adjusting a parameter of the signal processing facility, a learning facility for automatically learning the adjusted parameter for the current hearing situation, and a time monitoring facility for temporally monitoring the classification facility and the adjustment facility as well as for triggering an automatic learning of the learning facility, as soon as the classified hearing situation and the adjustment have not changed a predetermined time period.
The invention thus advantageously provides a simplified operational concept for hearing apparatuses and in particular hearing devices. The operation of the device is simplified as a result of the device learning and thereby improving its adjustments, without the user always having to think of pressing a “vote” button in situations in which he is happy. A further advantage of the concept according to the invention lies in the fact that more training units can be achieved. Significantly more training events are herewith be achieved as a result namely of the device attempting to learn after each user modification. The start adjustment thus converges more rapidly with the desired adjustments. This in turn results in faster training, because the user identifies earlier, by virtue of more frequent training events, that the device optimizes its adjustments itself. After some time, modifications by the user are no longer necessary as a result of the desired adjustment being achieved rapidly. A higher user acceptance can subsequently by achieved because the device adjusts rapidly and in an uncomplicated fashion to the individual hearing impression of the user.
An average value and/or a variance of a level is preferably analyzed with the automatic classification. Such an examination makes it possible to determine for instance whether the respective situation is clear or whether particular events have taken place of late. If the situation was not clear and particular events have optionally occurred, no step is carried out for the relevant time period. Instead, the learning process only starts after the hearing situation has been clearly determined.
In the event of a binaural supply, it is particularly advantageous if differences between the supply of the left ear and of the right ear are analyzed during the automatic classification. Information from the binaural supply can thus also be used for the automatic training.
The present invention is described in more detail with reference to the appended drawings, in which:
The exemplary embodiment illustrated in more detail below represents a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
A method for adjusting a hearing apparatus is carried out by way of example according to the flow diagram in
If, on the other hand, the hearing situation is classified clearly and no particular acoustic event has taken place, step S4 monitors whether the adjustment of the hearing apparatus and the hearing situation were constant for a certain amount of time. This monitoring time period can be predetermined in any fashion. While the end of the monitoring time period is not achieved, the system returns to step S2 and repeatedly monitors the classification and the presence of particular acoustic events.
If the adjustment and hearing situation are finally constant for the predetermined time period, step S5 is performed. In this step, the adjustment of the hearing device and/or of the hearing apparatus to the classified hearing situation is stored. After step S5, the system automatically reverts back again to the starting point in step S1. A further modification to the adjustment or a situation change can thus initiate a further step.
The automatic training of the hearing apparatus is subsequently shown again from the user's perspective.
According to the inventive solution, the “vote” button known from the prior art is replaced by a temporal controller. To this end, as was already just indicated with reference to
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2006 046 230.0 | Sep 2006 | DE | national |
