The present invention relates to a method for tracking the use of a probe-type medical apparatus in order to determine whether this apparatus may be safely used from a hygienic standpoint, as well as a tracking system that makes it possible to implement this method.
In the medical field, sanitation of the medical apparatuses being used is crucial in order to avoid any risk of infecting a patient because of an apparatus that has been poorly disinfected or not disinfected. For this reason, it is essential to ensure traceability of the disinfection process in order to be certain that an apparatus has in fact been disinfected before it is used.
Currently, this traceability is provided through manual operations by medical personnel. That is, the medical probe is accompanied by a record on which medical personnel must write the disinfection operations that have been carried out, along with the way the probe is used. In some cases, traceability is partially automated, and the information about a probe is assembled in a database. However, in this latter case, medical personnel must still enter the information regarding probe disinfection and use into the database themselves. Consequently, traceability is based on many human actions that can be sources of errors and/or falsification. Therefore, it is impossible to be absolutely certain whether a probe may be legitimately used from the standpoint of hygiene and of preventing nosocomial infections.
The purpose of the invention is to remedy these disadvantages by proposing a method for tracking the use of a probe in which the process of determining the legitimacy of using the probe is automated, and human involvement is limited.
To this end, an object of the invention is a method for tracking the use of a probe-type medical apparatus in order to determine whether this apparatus can be safely used from a hygienic standpoint, wherein said apparatus comprises means for identifying said apparatus and the method uses an information acquisition and processing system comprising means for acquiring information identifying said apparatus, means for acquiring information regarding the disinfection and use of said apparatus, and means for associating the identification and use information for said apparatus, the method comprising the following stages:
“Sequencing” is taken to mean that the information on disinfection and the information on use are put in order according to the moment in time when they were recorded, so as to create an event history for the medical apparatus.
The invention thus makes it possible to prohibit the use of the medical apparatus if using it is not legitimate from the standpoint of hygiene, e.g., if the apparatus has not been adequately disinfected or if too much time has elapsed since the apparatus was disinfected. This way, effective traceability is provided for the medical apparatus, which has no chance of being used if a certain chain of events (the disinfection stage) has not first taken place.
According to other characteristics of the method:
The invention also relates to a system for tracking the use of a probe-type medical apparatus that makes it possible to implement the method as described above, said system being characterized in that it comprises identification means associated with the medical apparatus, an information acquisition and processing system comprising means for acquiring the information identifying said apparatus, means for acquiring information regarding the use of said apparatus, date and time recording means, and means for associating identification and use information for said apparatus with date and time information.
According to other characteristics of the system:
The invention will be more easily understood in the following description, given only as an example, and written with reference to the annexed drawing, in which:
The medical apparatus according to the invention is, for example, a probe used with an ultrasonograph in a known manner. Such a probe will not be described in detail here, but typically comprises an active part and a part that connects to the ultrasonograph. The active part, which is in contact with the patients during a medical exam, must be sterilized without fail before being used on a patient in order to ensure satisfactory hygiene and prevent nocosomial infections.
Thus, it is mandatory to be able to trace probe disinfection and use in order to determine whether the active part of the probe has in fact been adequately disinfected before the probe is used on a patient. In order to provide this traceability, the probe comprises identification means permanently fixed on the probe.
These identification means are specific to each probe. In order to enable the tracking system to be automated, these identification means comprise an RFID chip molded into a plastic housing fixed to the probe or embedded in the material that forms the probe, for example. These identification means may be scanned remotely by means for acquiring the probe identification information.
The acquisition means comprise an RFID reader, for example, able to scan the information contained on the RFID chip associated with the probe. The identification information can be transmitted to a central data processing unit D that is part of a data acquisition and processing system that makes it possible to track the use of the probe, as will be described below.
During a stage A shown in
The means for acquiring the identification information and the date and time recording means can be associated with a disinfection enclosure or can be part of an independent, portable device placed in the disinfection room.
According to an embodiment, the independent, portable device is attached to the probe so that it follows the probe wherever it goes. An independent device of this kind can be an electronic label, for example, associated with a memory and attached to the probe.
According to an embodiment, the disinfection enclosure is provided with identification means so that the identity of the enclosure used for disinfecting the probe is transmitted to the data processing unit D.
Disinfection is performed during a stage A2. For example, disinfection is performed by exposing the active part of the probe to UV radiation, by soaking it in a bath comprising an active principle for disinfection, by exposing it to a liquid spray or by exposing it to a gas comprising an active principle for disinfection. In any case, means for acquiring information regarding the use of said apparatus make it possible to record the disinfection characteristics. These acquisition means comprise, for example, means for measuring the degree of disinfection provided by a disinfection enclosure. The recorded information can include a record of the active principle used for disinfection, the length of time the apparatus was exposed to this active principle, the disinfection temperature and/or the active principle dosage, for example. These measurements can be taken by sensors or by any other known means. This disinfection information Id is transmitted to the data processing unit D (
Thus, at the end of stage A, the system for tracking the use of a probe knows the type, degree, and time of disinfection for the probe whose use is being tracked.
According to the embodiment in which an independent device is provided, such as a device attached to the probe as described above, such a device includes the means for acquiring the identification information Ii, the means for acquiring use information regarding the use of said apparatus, and the date and time recording means. The device is able to communicate with an information processing system such as the data processing unit D. Such a device is used to record the identity of the operator performing disinfection, e.g., by means of a badge inserted into a scanning means of the housing, as well as the identity of the probe being disinfected. Once disinfection is finished, the operator enters the information on the degree of disinfection, or the device communicates with the data processing unit D in order to obtain the information on this degree of disinfection.
During a stage B, the probe is stored while waiting to be used. When the probe is placed in a storage enclosure, it is identified and the date is recorded. The storage beginning time is also recorded. When the probe is taken out of the storage enclosure, the storage end time is recorded. This information is transmitted to the processing unit D, as shown by the arrow 2 in
To this end, the storage enclosure comprises means for acquiring the identity of the probe, which are of the same type as those provided for the disinfection stage. These means can be associated with the storage enclosure or can be part of an independent, portable device located in the storage room. According to an embodiment, the independent device is the same as that used for disinfection, and it accompanies the probe into the storage room. According to an embodiment, provision is made so that the storage enclosure comprises identification means so that the identity of the enclosure used for storing the probe is transmitted to the data processing unit D.
The data processing unit D links the information obtained on disinfection of the probe with the information obtained on its storage. “Linking the information” is taken to mean that the processing unit relates the disinfection information to the storage information using the probe identification information, in such a way that for a probe identity, the processing unit can, for example, compare the degree of disinfection of the probe with its storage time.
Actually, for each type of disinfection and degree of disinfection, there is a corresponding maximum storage time. If the storage time of the probe exceeds the maximum storage time corresponding to the type and the degree of disinfection performed on the probe, then a new disinfection must be performed in order to make sure that the probe can be legitimately used from the standpoint of hygiene.
Thus, when the probe is taken out of the storage enclosure to be used, the data processing unit D verifies that the probe has been disinfected and compares the probe storage time to the maximum storage time corresponding to the disinfection performed on the probe.
If the probe has not been disinfected before being stored, the data processing unit D produces an order prohibiting the use of the probe, and the storage enclosure emits a rejection signal for the probe. The probe is not used, then, and is sent back to the disinfection stage A, as shown by the arrow 3 in
If the storage time exceeds the maximum storage time, the data processing unit produces an order prohibiting the use of the probe. The probe is not used, then, and is sent back to the disinfection stage A, as shown by the arrow 3 in
If the storage time is less than the maximum storage time, the probe can be safely used from the standpoint of hygiene. The data processing unit D then produces an order authorizing the use of the probe. The probe can then be used during a use stage C, as shown by the arrow 4 in
In the stage C in which the probe is used on a patient, the probe is identified and the exam date is recorded. This identification and the date are transmitted to the data processing unit D, as shown by the arrow 5 in
Thus, if the identified probe has not been disinfected prior to use, the data processing unit D produces an order prohibiting the use of the probe and transmits it to the imaging device or the independent, portable device. The probe is not used, then, and is sent back to the disinfection stage A, as shown by the arrow 6 in
If an order authorizing the use of the probe is produced and the operator in fact intends to use the probe, he confirms this use. This confirmation is recorded by the probe use tracking system, which makes it possible to ascertain whether a probe has been used or not. A usage confirmation of this kind is crucial, particularly if multiple probes are connected to the same medical imaging device. That is, in this case, multiple probes can be activated without necessarily being used subsequently, and then it becomes impossible to see from the outside whether a probe has in fact been used or not. The probe usage confirmation makes it possible to ascertain which probe was in fact used, and which probes were only activated, but not subsequently used. The usage confirmation makes it possible to ascertain the disinfection needs of a particular probe.
The probe usage tracking system comprises means for entering information regarding the use of the medical device. Thus, the physician who uses the probe on a patient can enter information on the use of the probe in order to provide data to the data processing unit D. For example, the information entered by the physician comprises the identity of the physician, the name of the patient, the type of treatment for which the probe is used, the patient pathology, and/or information on the system (e.g., the type of ultrasonograph) in which the device is used. In practice, this information can also be recovered from the data processing unit D by the imaging device or the independent device.
A record of the length of time the probe is used and information on the environment in which the probe is used can also be provided using means (sensors, etc.) similar to those used for probe disinfection.
The usage confirmation for a probe and all the above-mentioned information are transmitted to the data processing unit D, which links them with the information regarding disinfection and storage, and in this way produces an order authorizing or an order prohibiting the use of the probe based on an analysis using this information to determine whether it is legitimate from the hygienic standpoint to use the probe. In addition, linking all this information creates a waiting list, which is constantly being updated, of the medical apparatuses needing to be disinfected. This waiting list lets the people responsible for disinfection know which apparatuses to disinfect first, and it enables the storage enclosures to reject apparatuses that still appear on this waiting list.
Thus, if the type of treatment for which the probe is used requires a particular degree of disinfection, the processing unit verifies whether the probe was disinfected to the required degree, and if so, authorizes its use, and if not, prohibits its use.
If the environment (temperature, humidity, etc.) in which the probe is used is not an ideal environment for the use of the probe, the processing unit prohibits the use of the probe.
Other authorization and prohibition criteria for the probe may be provided and recorded in the data processing unit D, which produces the authorization or prohibition order for the probe based on these criteria and the information transmitted during the above-mentioned stages. These criteria may be standards established in the medical field, for example, and are recorded in the processing unit D, which verifies whether these criteria have been met prior to authorizing the use of the probe. All of these criteria are combined in order to authorize or prohibit the use of the probe.
To this end, the tracking system is provided with means for storing the information acquired and processed by the acquisition and processing system.
A history tracking the use of the probe is also recorded. This way, after the probe is used by a physician, the data processing unit D can produce specific disinfection instructions (degree and type of disinfection) depending on the type of treatment for which the probe was used, as shown by the arrow 7 in
Likewise, if the probe has a particular known useful life, the tracking system can determine whether the probe can still be used or whether it must be replaced according to the recorded history.
The invention thus makes it possible to guarantee that a particular probe is always used legitimately from the standpoint of hygiene, and to prevent a dangerous use of this probe.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07 54299 | Apr 2007 | FR | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2008/000464 | 4/3/2008 | WO | 00 | 11/5/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2009/004126 | 1/8/2009 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4772795 | Sakurai et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4948566 | Gabele et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5185532 | Zabsky et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5310524 | Campbell et al. | May 1994 | A |
5610811 | Honda | Mar 1997 | A |
5641464 | Briggs, III et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5690113 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5761069 | Weber et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5912818 | McGrady et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
6039928 | Roberts et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6171559 | Sanders et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6231819 | Morello | May 2001 | B1 |
6260560 | Walta | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6371326 | Gabele et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6475433 | McGeorge et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6485979 | Kippenhan et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6641781 | Walta | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6712756 | Kura et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
7694814 | Cristobal et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7965185 | Cambre et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7982199 | Deshays | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8313017 | Deshays | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8334521 | Deshays | Dec 2012 | B2 |
20010024623 | Grimm et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20020161460 | Noguchi | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162972 | Pleet | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030016122 | Petrick | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030039579 | Lambert et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030091471 | Lacabanne | May 2003 | A1 |
20030187586 | Katzenmaier et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040009091 | Deal et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040140347 | Mihaylov et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040209223 | Beier et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050196314 | Petersen et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070027459 | Horvath et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080213139 | Deshays | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090065034 | Suzuki et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090169436 | Deshays | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20100138234 | Deshays | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100140342 | Deshays | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145721 | Deshays | Jun 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
32 09 701 | Sep 1983 | DE |
39 17 876 | Dec 1990 | DE |
4420707 | Dec 1994 | DE |
19514284 | Oct 1996 | DE |
197 03 823 | May 1998 | DE |
199 17 206 | Oct 2000 | DE |
102 25 232 | Dec 2002 | DE |
102 25 857 | Jan 2004 | DE |
0 471 530 | Feb 1992 | EP |
0 630 820 | Dec 1994 | EP |
0 709 056 | May 1996 | EP |
0 709 056 | May 1996 | EP |
0 839 537 | May 1998 | EP |
1155654 | Nov 2001 | EP |
1402904 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1 532 989 | May 2005 | EP |
2 753 905 | Apr 1998 | FR |
2 890 566 | Mar 2007 | FR |
2 890 864 | Mar 2007 | FR |
2 890 865 | Mar 2007 | FR |
WO-8400009 | Jan 1984 | WO |
WO-9908137 | Feb 1999 | WO |
9966444 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO-0180908 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-2004111917 | Dec 2004 | WO |
2005048041 | May 2005 | WO |
WO 2005048041 | May 2005 | WO |
WO-2006115177 | Nov 2006 | WO |
WO-2007016101 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO-2007034083 | Mar 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for PCT/FR2008/000464, mailing date Feb. 23, 2009. |
International Search Report mailed on Feb. 23, 2009 for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2008/000465, filed on Apr. 3, 2008, 3 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Jan. 22, 2009, for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2008/000540, 3 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Jan. 22, 2009, for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2008/000541, 3 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Sep. 11, 2007, for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2007/000594, 3 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Jul. 18, 2006, for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2005/003034, 3 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Jul. 6, 2006, for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2005/003032, 3 pages. |
International Search Report mailed on Mar. 21, 2006, for PCT Application No. PCT/FR2005/003031, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100145721 A1 | Jun 2010 | US |