Method for training a driving related object detector

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11827215
  • Patent Number
    11,827,215
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 31, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 28, 2023
    6 months ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
    • AUTOBRAINS TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
  • Examiners
    • Entezari; Michelle M
    Agents
    • Reches Patents
Abstract
A method for driving-related object detection, the method may include receiving an input image by an input of an object detector; and detecting, by an object detector, objects that appear in the input image. The detecting includes searching for (i) a first object having a first size that is within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object having a second size that is within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range does not substantially exceed a minimum of the second size range.
Description
BACKGROUND

Object detection is required in various systems and applications.


Autonomous vehicles and advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) may include object detection units that should detect driving related objects such as vehicles and pedestrians.


These object detection units are trained using a supervised machine learning process.


In a supervised machine learning process test images are fed to an object detector that outputs an estimate of the objects that appear in the test images.


An error unit receives the estimate and calculated an error between the estimate and reference information that indicates which objects appeared in the test images.


The error is fed to the object detector in order to adjust the object detector to the actual objects that appeared in the test images.


The error calculation and the adjustment of the object detector may be performed in an iterative manner—for example per test image.


The reference information may be generated manually or by other error prone processes and this may reduce the accuracy of the error calculation.


Furthermore—the object detector may be adjusted to compensate for insignificant differences between objects. This adjustment may deviate the configuration of the object detector from an ideal configuration and may also consume many computational resources.


There is a growing need to provide a method, computer readable medium and a system that may be able to provide highly accurate object detection at a low cost.


SUMMARY

There may be provided a method for driving-related object detection, the method may include receiving an input image by an input of an object detector; and


detecting, by an object detector, objects that appear in the input image; wherein the detecting may include searching for (i) a first object having a first size that may be within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object having a second size that may be within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range does not substantially exceed a minimum of the second size range.


The object detector may be trained to detect (i) four wheel vehicle having a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car having a size within the second size range, (b) a truck having a size within the second size range, (c) a bus having a size within the second size range, and (d) a van having a size within the second size range.


The receiving may be preceded by training the object detector to detect (i) four wheel vehicle having a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car having a size within the second size range, (b) a truck having a size within the second size range, (c) a bus having a size within the second size range, and (d) a van having a size within the second size range.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, at least some of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, may have a unique set of anchors.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian may have a unique set of anchors.


The object detector may include a shallow neural network that may be followed by a region unit.


The the region unit may include a dedicated section for each one out of the four wheel vehicle class, the two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian.


The the shallow neural network may include five by file convolutional filters.


The first size range and the second size range may not overlap.


The first size range and the second size range partially overlap.


There may be provided a non-transitory computer readable medium for driving-related object detection by an object detector, the non-transitory computer readable medium stores instructions for receiving an input image by an input of the object detector; and detecting, by an object detector, objects that appear in the input image; wherein the detecting may include searching for (i) a first object having a first size that may be within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object having a second size that may be within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range does not substantially exceed a minimum of the second size range.


The object detector may be trained to detect (i) four wheel vehicle having a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car having a size within the second size range, (b) a truck having a size within the second size range, (c) a bus having a size within the second size range, and (d) a van having a size within the second size range.


The non-transitory computer readable medium that stores instructions for training the object detector to detect (i) four wheel vehicle having a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car having a size within the second size range, (b) a truck having a size within the second size range, (c) a bus having a size within the second size range, and (d) a van having a size within the second size range.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, at least some of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, may have a unique set of anchors.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian may have a unique set of anchors.


The object detector may include a shallow neural network that may be followed by a region unit.


The non-transitory computer readable medium wherein the region unit may include a dedicated section for each one out of the four wheel vehicle class, the two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian.


The non-transitory computer readable medium wherein the shallow neural network may include five by file convolutional filters.


The first size range and the second size range may not overlap.


The first size range and the second size range partially overlap.


There may be provided an object detector that may include an input, a shallow neural network and a region unit; wherein the region unit follows the shallow neural network; wherein the input may be configured to receive an input image; and wherein the shallow neural network and the region unit may be configured to cooperate and detect objects that appear in the input image; wherein a detecting of the object may include may include searching for (i) a first object having a first size that may be within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object having a second size that may be within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range does not substantially exceed a minimum of the second size range.


The object detector may be trained to detect (i) four wheel vehicle having a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car having a size within the second size range, (b) a truck having a size within the second size range, (c) a bus having a size within the second size range, and (d) a van having a size within the second size range.


The receiving may be preceded by training the object detector to detect (i) four wheel vehicle having a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car having a size within the second size range, (b) a truck having a size within the second size range, (c) a bus having a size within the second size range, and (d) a van having a size within the second size range.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, at least some of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, may have a unique set of anchors.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian may have a unique set of anchors.


The region unit may include a dedicated section for each one out of the four wheel vehicle class, the two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian.


The shallow neural network may include five by file convolutional filters.


The first size range and the second size range may not overlap.


The first size range and the second size range partially overlap.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The embodiments of the disclosure will be understood and appreciated more fully from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates an example of a method for object detection;



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of an image;



FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a classification of some of the objects that appear in the image;



FIG. 4 illustrates an example of the image of FIG. 1 with bounding boxes that surround some of the objects that appear in the image;



FIG. 5 illustrates an example of an object detector;



FIG. 6 illustrates an example of various objects; and



FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a training process.





DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS

In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the present invention.


The subject matter regarded as the invention is particularly pointed out and distinctly claimed in the concluding portion of the specification. The invention, however, both as to organization and method of operation, together with objects, features, and advantages thereof, may best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read with the accompanying drawings.


It will be appreciated that for simplicity and clarity of illustration, elements shown in the figures have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements may be exaggerated relative to other elements for clarity. Further, where considered appropriate, reference numerals may be repeated among the figures to indicate corresponding or analogous elements.


Because the illustrated embodiments of the present invention may for the most part, be implemented using electronic components and circuits known to those skilled in the art, details will not be explained in any greater extent than that considered necessary as illustrated above, for the understanding and appreciation of the underlying concepts of the present invention and in order not to obfuscate or distract from the teachings of the present invention.


Any reference in the specification to a method should be applied mutatis mutandis to a device or system capable of executing the method and/or to a non-transitory computer readable medium that stores instructions for executing the method.


Any reference in the specification to a system or device should be applied mutatis mutandis to a method that may be executed by the system, and/or may be applied mutatis mutandis to non-transitory computer readable medium that stores instructions executable by the system.


Any reference in the specification to a non-transitory computer readable medium should be applied mutatis mutandis to a device or system capable of executing instructions stored in the non-transitory computer readable medium and/or may be applied mutatis mutandis to a method for executing the instructions.


Any combination of any module or unit listed in any of the figures, any part of the specification and/or any claims may be provided.


There may be provided a low power object detection system (detector), non-transitory computer readable medium, and method. The object detection system, non-transitory computer readable medium and method may prevent errors in learning processes resulting of inaccurate tagging of relatively small four wheel vehicles by classifying (during the training process) objects that are relatively small (appear small in an input image)—within a first size range to a general class of four wheel vehicles.


Larger four wheel vehicle may be classified more accurately to subclasses such as car, bur, truck, van and the like. Other classes (used for at least classifying small objects) include, for example two wheel vehicles and pedestrians.


Each of these other classes may also include subclasses that may be applied to objects that are larger and can be accurately tagged (during the training process) to finer subclasses.


This size based classification increases the accuracy of the reference information received during the training, improves the accuracy of the training process, improves the accuracy of the object detection and also prevents the training process to spend too much resources on attempting to differentiate between insignificant differences. This also provides an object detector that is fine tunes to differentiate between difference that are significant.


After the completion of the training process the object detector it set to detect in an accurate manner the objects according to their size and classes or subclasses.



FIG. 1 illustrates method 9270 for driving-related object detection.


Method 9270 may include the steps of:

    • Step 9272 of receiving an input image by an input of an object detector.
    • Step 9274 of detecting, by an object detector, objects that appear in the input image.


Step 9272 may include searching for (i) a first object having a first size that is within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object having a second size that is within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range does not substantially exceed a minimum of the second size range.


The object detector may be trained to perform said search (and method 9270 may include the training—step 9271) by feeding the object detector with images of objects that are tagged according to the searched objects (i) till (iv). The object detector may be also trained to reject objects that are too big and. The training includes feeding the object detector with images that include objects of at least one of the four types (i)-(iv), generating reference information that tags the objects according the the searched types, calculating an error between the outcome of the object detector and the reference information and feeding the error to the object detector.


The subclasses of the four wheel vehicle class may include at least some of the following car, truck, bus, van and the like. The subclasses may include or may be further partitioned to certain type of vehicle, model, and the like.


Accordingly—the classification system may include two layers (single class and single layer of subclasses) or even more layer—to provide a hierarchical classification system that may include more than two layers. For example—a first layer includes a four wheel vehicle, the second layer (subclasses) include car, bus, truck, van and the third layer may include a manufacturer, yet a fourth layer may include model, and the like.


The class of pedestrians and/or the class of two wheel vehicles can also include subclasses to include two or more layers.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, at least some of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, may have has a unique set of anchors. The unique sets of anchors may be selected based on the expected shape of the objects that belong to the class and/or the subclass.


Each one of the four wheel vehicle class, two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian has a unique set of anchors.


Anchors may be regarded as initial templates of bounding boxes and using different anchors to different classes may reduce the computational resources, speed the detection and increase the accuracy of the bounding boxes when the different anchors are selected according to the expected shapes of the different vehicles. For example, in a side view, a bus appears longer and higher than a private car. Yet for another example a pedestrian may require bounding boxes that have a height that exceeds their width—while trucks (for example in side view) may require bounding boxes that have a height that is smaller than their width.



FIG. 2 is an example of an image 9301 that includes first bus 9311, second bus 9314, third bus 9316, first truck 9313, second truck 9317, third truck 9318, first car 9315, first bicycle 9319, and first foot scooter 9312.



FIG. 3 illustrates the tagging of the objects of image 9301. The tagging may be included in a reference information used to train the object detector or may be the outcome of the object detection process.


Third bus 9316, second truck 9317, third truck 9318, first car 9315 and first bicycle 9319 are too small (for example have a size within a first size range) and therefore are tagged to classes and not to subclasses.


Third bus 9316, second truck 9317, third truck 9318, first car 9315 are regarded as belonging to a four wheel vehicles class 9321.


The first bicycle 9319 is tagged to belonging to a two wheel vehicle class 9322.


First bus 9311 is large enough (has a size within a second size range) to be tagged as a truck 9325. First bus 9311 and second bus 9314 are large enough (has a size within a second size range) to be tagged as a bus. First foot scooter 9312 is large enough (has a size within a second size range) to be tagged as a foot scooter 9325.



FIG. 4 illustrates an example of a possible output of the object detector—bounding boxes 9310, 9311, 9312, 9313, 9314, 9315, 9316, 9317, 9318 and 9319 that surround pedestrian 9310, first bus 9311, foot scooter 9312, first truck 9313, second bus 9314, first car 9315, third bus 9316, second truck 9317, third truck 9318, first bicycle 9319, respectively.


Each bounding is represented by information 9025 that may include coordinates (x,y,h,w) of the bounding boxes, objectiveness and class. The coordinate indicate the location (x,y) as well as the height and width of the bounding boxes. Objectiveness provides a confidence level that an object exists. Class—class of object—as illustrated above). The (x,y) coordinates may represent the center of the bounding box.


The object detection may be compliant to any flavor of YOLO—but other object detection schemes may be applied.



FIG. 5 illustrates an object detector 9000″ and FIG. 7 illustrates a training process of the object detector.


Object detector 9000″ may include an input 9250, a shallow neural network 9252 and a region unit 9254.


The region unit 9254 follows the shallow neural network 9252.


Input 9250 may be configured to receive an input image 9001.


The shallow neural network 9252 and the region unit 9254 may be configured to cooperate (both participate in the object detection process—the region unit processed the output of the shallow neural network) and detect objects that appear in the input image.


The detecting of the object may include may include searching for (i) a first object having a first size that may be within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object having a second size that may be within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range does not substantially exceed a minimum of the second size range.


The shallow neural network 9252 may include convolutional and spooling layers.


The convolutional layers may include convolutional filters. The convolutional filters may be of any shape and size—for example be five by five convolutional filters (have a kernel of five by five elements), be a three by three convolutional filters (have a kernel of three by three elements), and the like.


Object detector 9000″ may be configured to execute method 9270.


The region unit may include a dedicated section for each one out of the four wheel vehicle class, the two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian. This will improve the detection per each class of objects.


At least a part of the object detector may be a processing circuitry that may be implemented as a central processing unit (CPU), and/or one or more other integrated circuits such as application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), full-custom integrated circuits, etc., or a combination of such integrated circuits.


At least a part of the object detector may be application implemented in hardware, firmware, or software that may be executed by a processing circuitry.


Regarding the training process:


Test images 9001 are fed to shallow neural network 9252 that outputs, for each test image, a shallow neural network output that may be a tensor with multiple features per segment of the test image. The region unit 9054 is configured to receive the output from shallow neural network 9252 and calculate and output candidate bounding boxes per test image. Actual results such as the output candidate bounding boxes per test image may be fed to error calculation unit 9050.


Error calculation unit 9050 also receives desired results 9045—objects that are tagged to belong to (i) a four wheel vehicle class (if the size with within the first size range), or to (ii) a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses ((if the size with within the first size range), (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle.


Error calculation unit 9050 calculates an error 9055 between the the actual results and the desired results- and the error is fed to the shallow neural network 9252 during the training process.


It should be noted that in addition to the mentioned above training—the shallow neural network 9252 may be trained to reject (not detect) objects that are too big—for example outside the first and second size ranges.


This may require to train the shallow neural network 9252 not to detect said objects.



FIG. 7 illustrates various objects such as 9031, 9032, 9033 and 9034.


Objects 9033 and 9034 are too big and should be ignored of.


While the foregoing written description of the invention enables one of ordinary skill to make and use what is considered presently to be the best mode thereof, those of ordinary skill will understand and appreciate the existence of variations, combinations, and equivalents of the specific embodiment, method, and examples herein. The invention should therefore not be limited by the above described embodiment, method, and examples, but by all embodiments and methods within the scope and spirit of the invention as claimed.


In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific examples of embodiments of the invention. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made therein without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.


Moreover, the terms “front,” “back,” “top,” “bottom,” “over,” “under” and the like in the description and in the claims, if any, are used for descriptive purposes and not necessarily for describing permanent relative positions. It is understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the invention described herein are, for example, capable of operation in other orientations than those illustrated or otherwise described herein.


Furthermore, the terms “assert” or “set” and “negate” (or “deassert” or “clear”) are used herein when referring to the rendering of a signal, status bit, or similar apparatus into its logically true or logically false state, respectively. If the logically true state is a logic level one, the logically false state is a logic level zero. And if the logically true state is a logic level zero, the logically false state is a logic level one.


Those skilled in the art will recognize that the boundaries between logic blocks are merely illustrative and that alternative embodiments may merge logic blocks or circuit elements or impose an alternate decomposition of functionality upon various logic blocks or circuit elements. Thus, it is to be understood that the architectures depicted herein are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures may be implemented which achieve the same functionality.


Any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality may be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected,” or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality.


Furthermore, those skilled in the art will recognize that boundaries between the above described operations merely illustrative. The multiple operations may be combined into a single operation, a single operation may be distributed in additional operations and operations may be executed at least partially overlapping in time. Moreover, alternative embodiments may include multiple instances of a particular operation, and the order of operations may be altered in various other embodiments.


Also for example, in one embodiment, the illustrated examples may be implemented as circuitry located on a single integrated circuit or within a same device. Alternatively, the examples may be implemented as any number of separate integrated circuits or separate devices interconnected with each other in a suitable manner.


However, other modifications, variations and alternatives are also possible. The specifications and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than in a restrictive sense.


In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word ‘comprising’ does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps then those listed in a claim. Furthermore, the terms “a” or “an,” as used herein, are defined as one or more than one. Also, the use of introductory phrases such as “at least one” and “one or more” in the claims should not be construed to imply that the introduction of another claim element by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim element to inventions containing only one such element, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an.” The same holds true for the use of definite articles. Unless stated otherwise, terms such as “first” and “second” are used to arbitrarily distinguish between the elements such terms describe. Thus, these terms are not necessarily intended to indicate temporal or other prioritization of such elements. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.


While certain features of the invention have been illustrated and described herein, many modifications, substitutions, changes, and equivalents will now occur to those of ordinary skill in the art. It is, therefore, to be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and changes as fall within the true spirit of the invention.


It is appreciated that various features of the embodiments of the disclosure which are, for clarity, described in the contexts of separate embodiments may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the embodiments of the disclosure which are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment may also be provided separately or in any suitable sub-combination.


It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that the embodiments of the disclosure are not limited by what has been particularly shown and described hereinabove. Rather the scope of the embodiments of the disclosure is defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A method for driving-related object detection, the method comprises: receiving an input image by an input of an object detector; anddetecting, by the object detector, objects that appear in the input image;wherein the detecting comprises searching for (i) a first object that appears in the image at a first size that is within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object that appears in the image at a second size that is within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range is smaller than a minimum of the second size range;wherein the searching for the first object comprises preventing from classifying a four wheel vehicle to any of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses when the four wheel vehicle appears in the image at a size that is within the first size range.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the object detector is trained to detect (i) four wheel vehicle that appears in the image at a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (b) a truck that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (c) a bus that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, and (d) a van that appears in the image at a size within the second size range.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the receiving is preceded by training the object detector to detect (i) four wheel vehicle that appears in the image at a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (b) a truck that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (c) a bus that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, and (d) a van that appears in the image at a size within the second size range.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1 wherein each one of the four wheel vehicle class, at least some of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, has a unique set of anchors.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the detecting comprises ignoring objects that appear in the image at a size that exceeds a maximal value of the second size range.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the object detector comprises a shallow neural network that is followed by a region unit.
  • 7. The method according to claim 6 wherein the region unit comprises a dedicated section for each one out of the four wheel vehicle class, the two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian.
  • 8. The method according to claim 6 wherein the shallow neural network comprises five by five convolutional filters.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1 wherein each one of the four wheel vehicle class, two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian has a unique set of anchors, the anchors are initial templates of bounding boxes.
  • 10. The method according to claim 9 wherein different anchors are selected according to expected shapes of the vehicles.
  • 11. A non-transitory computer readable medium for driving-related object detection by an object detector, the non-transitory computer readable medium stores instructions for: receiving an input image by an input of the object detector; anddetecting, by the object detector, objects that appear in the input image;wherein the detecting comprises searching for (i) a first object that appears in the image at a first size that is within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object that appears in the image at a second size that is within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range is smaller than a minimum of the second size range;wherein the searching for the first object comprises preventing from classifying a four wheel vehicle to any of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses when the four wheel vehicle appears in the image at a size that is within the first size range.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 11 wherein the object detector is trained to detect (i) four wheel vehicle that appears in the image at a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (b) a truck that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (c) a bus that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, and (d) a van that appears in the image at a size within the second size range.
  • 13. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 11 that stores instructions for training the object detector to detect (i) four wheel vehicle that appears in the image at a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (b) a truck that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (c) a bus that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, and (d) a van that appears in the image at a size within the second size range.
  • 14. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 11 wherein each one of the four wheel vehicle class, at least some of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, has a unique set of anchors.
  • 15. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 11 wherein the detecting comprises ignoring objects that appear in the image at a size that exceeds a maximal value of the second size range.
  • 16. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 11 wherein the object detector comprises a shallow neural network that is followed by a region unit.
  • 17. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 16 wherein the region unit comprises a dedicated section for each one out of the four wheel vehicle class, the two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian.
  • 18. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 16 wherein the shallow neural network comprises five by five convolutional filters.
  • 19. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 11 wherein each one of the four wheel vehicle class, two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian has a unique set of anchors, the anchors are initial templates of bounding boxes.
  • 20. The non-transitory computer readable medium according to claim 19 wherein different anchors are selected according to expected shapes of the vehicles.
  • 21. An object detector that comprises an input, a shallow neural network and a region unit; wherein the region unit follows the shallow neural network; wherein the input is configured to receive an input image; and wherein the shallow neural network and the region unit are configured to cooperate and detect objects that appear in the input image; wherein a detecting of the object comprises searching for (i) a first object that appears in the image at a first size that is within a first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, (ii) a second object that appears in the image at a second size that is within a second size range and belongs to a subclass out of multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, (iii) a pedestrian, and (iv) a two wheel vehicle; wherein a maximum of the first size range is smaller than a minimum of the second size range; wherein the searching for the first object comprises preventing from classifying a four wheel vehicle to any of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses when the four wheel vehicle appears in the image at a size that is within the first size range.
  • 22. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein the object detector is trained to detect (i) four wheel vehicle that appears in the image at a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (b) a truck that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (c) a bus that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, and (d) a van that appears in the image at a size within the second size range.
  • 23. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein the receiving is preceded by training the object detector to detect (i) four wheel vehicle that appears in the image at a size within the first size range and belongs to a four wheel vehicle class, and at least two out of (a) a car that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (b) a truck that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, (c) a bus that appears in the image at a size within the second size range, and (d) a van that appears in the image at a size within the second size range.
  • 24. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein each one of the four wheel vehicle class, at least some of the multiple four wheel vehicle subclasses, has a unique set of anchors.
  • 25. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein the detecting comprises ignoring objects that appear in the image at a size that exceeds a maximal value of the second size range.
  • 26. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein the region unit comprises a dedicated section for each one out of the four wheel vehicle class, the two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian.
  • 27. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein the shallow neural network comprises five by five convolutional filters.
  • 28. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein each one of the four wheel vehicle class, two wheel vehicle and the pedestrian has a unique set of anchors, the anchors are initial templates of bounding boxes.
  • 29. The object detector according to claim 21 wherein different anchors are selected according to expected shapes of the vehicles.
US Referenced Citations (458)
Number Name Date Kind
4733353 Jaswa Mar 1988 A
4932645 Schorey et al. Jun 1990 A
4972363 Nguyen et al. Nov 1990 A
5078501 Hekker et al. Jan 1992 A
5214746 Fogel et al. May 1993 A
5307451 Clark Apr 1994 A
5412564 Ecer May 1995 A
5436653 Ellis et al. Jul 1995 A
5568181 Greenwood et al. Oct 1996 A
5638425 Meador, I et al. Jun 1997 A
5745678 Herzberg et al. Apr 1998 A
5754938 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5763069 Jordan Jun 1998 A
5806061 Chaudhuri et al. Sep 1998 A
5835087 Herz et al. Nov 1998 A
5835901 Duvoisin et al. Nov 1998 A
5852435 Vigneaux et al. Dec 1998 A
5870754 Dimitrova et al. Feb 1999 A
5873080 Coden et al. Feb 1999 A
5887193 Takahashi et al. Mar 1999 A
5926812 Hilsenrath et al. Jul 1999 A
5978754 Kumano Nov 1999 A
5991306 Burns et al. Nov 1999 A
6052481 Grajski et al. Apr 2000 A
6070167 Qian et al. May 2000 A
6076088 Paik et al. Jun 2000 A
6122628 Castelli et al. Sep 2000 A
6128651 Cezar Oct 2000 A
6137911 Zhilyaev Oct 2000 A
6144767 Bottou et al. Nov 2000 A
6147636 Gershenson Nov 2000 A
6163510 Lee et al. Dec 2000 A
6243375 Speicher Jun 2001 B1
6243713 Nelson et al. Jun 2001 B1
6275599 Adler et al. Aug 2001 B1
6314419 Faisal Nov 2001 B1
6329986 Cheng Dec 2001 B1
6381656 Shankman Apr 2002 B1
6411229 Kobayashi Jun 2002 B2
6422617 Fukumoto et al. Jul 2002 B1
6507672 Watkins et al. Jan 2003 B1
6523046 Liu et al. Feb 2003 B2
6524861 Anderson Feb 2003 B1
6546405 Gupta et al. Apr 2003 B2
6550018 Abonamah et al. Apr 2003 B1
6557042 He et al. Apr 2003 B1
6594699 Sahai et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601026 Appelt et al. Jul 2003 B2
6611628 Sekiguchi et al. Aug 2003 B1
6618711 Ananth Sep 2003 B1
6640015 Lafruit Oct 2003 B1
6643620 Contolini et al. Nov 2003 B1
6643643 Lee et al. Nov 2003 B1
6665657 Dibachi Dec 2003 B1
6681032 Bortolussi et al. Jan 2004 B2
6704725 Lee Mar 2004 B1
6732149 Kephart May 2004 B1
6742094 Igari May 2004 B2
6751363 Natsev et al. Jun 2004 B1
6751613 Lee et al. Jun 2004 B1
6754435 Kim Jun 2004 B2
6763069 Divakaran et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763519 McColl et al. Jul 2004 B1
6774917 Foote et al. Aug 2004 B1
6795818 Lee Sep 2004 B1
6804356 Krishnamachari Oct 2004 B1
6813395 Kinjo Nov 2004 B1
6819797 Smith et al. Nov 2004 B1
6877134 Fuller et al. Apr 2005 B1
6901207 Watkins May 2005 B1
6938025 Lulich et al. Aug 2005 B1
6985172 Rigney et al. Jan 2006 B1
7013051 Sekiguchi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7020654 Najmi Mar 2006 B1
7023979 Wu et al. Apr 2006 B1
7043473 Rassool et al. May 2006 B1
7158681 Persiantsev Jan 2007 B2
7215828 Luo May 2007 B2
7260564 Lynn et al. Aug 2007 B1
7289643 Brunk et al. Oct 2007 B2
7299261 Oliver et al. Nov 2007 B1
7302089 Smits Nov 2007 B1
7302117 Sekiguchi et al. Nov 2007 B2
7313805 Rosin et al. Dec 2007 B1
7340358 Yoneyama Mar 2008 B2
7346629 Kapur et al. Mar 2008 B2
7353224 Chen et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376672 Weare May 2008 B2
7383179 Alves et al. Jun 2008 B2
7433895 Li et al. Oct 2008 B2
7464086 Black et al. Dec 2008 B2
7529659 Wold May 2009 B2
7657100 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7660468 Gokturk et al. Feb 2010 B2
7801893 Gulli Sep 2010 B2
7805446 Potok et al. Sep 2010 B2
7860895 Scofield et al. Dec 2010 B1
7872669 Darrell et al. Jan 2011 B2
7921288 Hildebrand Apr 2011 B1
7933407 Keidar et al. Apr 2011 B2
8023739 Hohimer et al. Sep 2011 B2
8266185 Raichelgauz et al. Sep 2012 B2
8275764 Jeon Sep 2012 B2
8285718 Ong et al. Oct 2012 B1
8312031 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2012 B2
8315442 Gokturk et al. Nov 2012 B2
8345982 Gokturk et al. Jan 2013 B2
8386400 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2013 B2
8396876 Kennedy et al. Mar 2013 B2
8418206 Bryant et al. Apr 2013 B2
RE44225 Aviv May 2013 E
8442321 Chang et al. May 2013 B1
8457827 Ferguson et al. Jun 2013 B1
8495489 Everingham Jul 2013 B1
8527978 Sallam Sep 2013 B1
8634980 Urmson Jan 2014 B1
8635531 Graham et al. Jan 2014 B2
8655801 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2014 B2
8655878 Kulkarni et al. Feb 2014 B1
8781152 Momeyer Jul 2014 B2
8782077 Rowley Jul 2014 B1
8799195 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8799196 Raichelquaz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8818916 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2014 B2
8868861 Shimizu et al. Oct 2014 B2
8886648 Procopio et al. Nov 2014 B1
8954887 Tseng et al. Feb 2015 B1
8990199 Ramesh et al. Mar 2015 B1
9009086 Raichelgauz et al. Apr 2015 B2
9104747 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2015 B2
9165406 Gray et al. Oct 2015 B1
9298763 Zack Mar 2016 B1
9311308 Sankarasubramaniam et al. Apr 2016 B2
9323754 Ramanathan et al. Apr 2016 B2
9440647 Sucan Sep 2016 B1
9466068 Raichelgauz et al. Oct 2016 B2
9646006 Raichelgauz et al. May 2017 B2
9679062 Schillings et al. Jun 2017 B2
9734533 Givot Aug 2017 B1
9807442 Bhatia et al. Oct 2017 B2
9862318 Lessmann Jan 2018 B2
9875445 Amer et al. Jan 2018 B2
9984369 Li et al. May 2018 B2
10133947 Yang Nov 2018 B2
10347122 Takenaka Jul 2019 B2
10491885 Hicks Nov 2019 B1
10949982 Wang Mar 2021 B1
20010019633 Tenze et al. Sep 2001 A1
20010034219 Hewitt et al. Oct 2001 A1
20010038876 Anderson Nov 2001 A1
20020004743 Kutaragi et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010682 Johnson Jan 2002 A1
20020010715 Chinn et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020019881 Bokhari et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020032677 Morgenthaler et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020038299 Zernik et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020042914 Walker et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020072935 Rowse et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020087530 Smith et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020087828 Arimilli et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020091947 Nakamura Jul 2002 A1
20020107827 Benitez-Jimenez et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020113812 Walker et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020126002 Patchell Sep 2002 A1
20020126872 Brunk et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129140 Peled et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020147637 Kraft et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020157116 Jasinschi Oct 2002 A1
20020163532 Thomas et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174095 Lulich et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020184505 Mihcak et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030004966 Bolle et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005432 Ellis et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030037010 Schmelzer Feb 2003 A1
20030041047 Chang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030089216 Birmingham et al. May 2003 A1
20030093790 Logan et al. May 2003 A1
20030101150 Agnihotri et al. May 2003 A1
20030105739 Essafi et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110236 Yang et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030115191 Copperman et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030126147 Essafi et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030140257 Peterka et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030165269 Fedorovskaya et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030174859 Kim Sep 2003 A1
20030184598 Graham Oct 2003 A1
20030200217 Ackerman Oct 2003 A1
20030217335 Chung et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030229531 Heckerman et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040059736 Willse Mar 2004 A1
20040091111 Levy May 2004 A1
20040095376 Graham et al. May 2004 A1
20040098671 Graham et al. May 2004 A1
20040111432 Adams et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040117638 Monroe Jun 2004 A1
20040128511 Sun et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153426 Nugent Aug 2004 A1
20040162820 James et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040230572 Omoigui Nov 2004 A1
20040267774 Lin et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050021394 Miedema et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050080788 Murata Apr 2005 A1
20050114198 Koningstein et al. May 2005 A1
20050131884 Gross et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050163375 Grady Jul 2005 A1
20050172130 Roberts Aug 2005 A1
20050177372 Wang et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050193015 Logston Sep 2005 A1
20050226511 Short Oct 2005 A1
20050238198 Brown et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050238238 Xu et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050249398 Khamene et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050256820 Dugan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050262428 Little et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050281439 Lange Dec 2005 A1
20050289163 Gordon et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050289590 Cheok et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060004745 Kuhn et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060015580 Gabriel et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060020958 Allamanche et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060033163 Chen Feb 2006 A1
20060050993 Stentiford Mar 2006 A1
20060069668 Braddy et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060080311 Potok et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060100987 Leurs May 2006 A1
20060112035 Cecchi et al. May 2006 A1
20060120626 Perlmutter Jun 2006 A1
20060129822 Snijder et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060217818 Fujiwara Sep 2006 A1
20060217828 Hicken Sep 2006 A1
20060218191 Gopalakrishnan Sep 2006 A1
20060224529 Kermani Oct 2006 A1
20060236343 Chang Oct 2006 A1
20060242130 Sadri et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060248558 Barton et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060251338 Gokturk et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060251339 Gokturk Nov 2006 A1
20060253423 McLane et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060288002 Epstein et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070022374 Huang et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070033170 Sull et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070038614 Guha Feb 2007 A1
20070042757 Jung et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070061302 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067304 Ives Mar 2007 A1
20070074147 Wold Mar 2007 A1
20070083611 Farago et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070091106 Moroney Apr 2007 A1
20070130159 Gulli et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070136782 Ramaswamy et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070156720 Maren Jul 2007 A1
20070168941 Luo Jul 2007 A1
20070196013 Li Aug 2007 A1
20070244902 Seide et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070253594 Lu et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070298152 Baets Dec 2007 A1
20080049789 Vedantham et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080072256 Boicey et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080079729 Brailovsky Apr 2008 A1
20080109433 Rose May 2008 A1
20080152231 Gokturk et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080159622 Agnihotri et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080165861 Wen et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080166020 Kosaka Jul 2008 A1
20080201299 Lehikoinen et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201314 Smith et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080201361 Castro et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228995 Tan et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080237359 Silverbrook et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080247543 Mick et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080253737 Kimura et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080263579 Mears et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270373 Oostveen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270569 McBride Oct 2008 A1
20080294278 Borgeson et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080307454 Ahanger et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080313140 Pereira et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090022472 Bronstein Jan 2009 A1
20090024641 Quigley et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090034791 Doretto Feb 2009 A1
20090037088 Taguchi Feb 2009 A1
20090043637 Eder Feb 2009 A1
20090043818 Raichelgauz Feb 2009 A1
20090080759 Bhaskar Mar 2009 A1
20090096634 Emam et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090125544 Brindley May 2009 A1
20090157575 Schobben et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090165031 Li et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090172030 Schiff et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090208106 Dunlop et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090208118 Csurka Aug 2009 A1
20090216761 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090220138 Zhang et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090245573 Saptharishi et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090254572 Redlich et al. Oct 2009 A1
20090278934 Ecker Nov 2009 A1
20090282218 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090297048 Slotine et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100042646 Raichelgauz et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100082684 Churchill et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100104184 Bronstein et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100111408 Matsuhira May 2010 A1
20100125569 Nair et al. May 2010 A1
20100162405 Cook et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100191391 Zeng Jul 2010 A1
20100198626 Cho et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100212015 Jin et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100284604 Chrysanthakopoulos Nov 2010 A1
20100293057 Haveliwala et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100306193 Pereira Dec 2010 A1
20100312736 Kello Dec 2010 A1
20100318493 Wessling Dec 2010 A1
20100325138 Lee et al. Dec 2010 A1
20100325581 Finkelstein et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110029620 Bonforte Feb 2011 A1
20110035373 Berg et al. Feb 2011 A1
20110038545 Bober Feb 2011 A1
20110055585 Lee Mar 2011 A1
20110164180 Lee Jul 2011 A1
20110164810 Zang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110216209 Fredlund et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110218946 Stern et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110246566 Kashef Oct 2011 A1
20110276680 Rimon Nov 2011 A1
20110296315 Lin et al. Dec 2011 A1
20120131454 Shah May 2012 A1
20120133497 Sasaki May 2012 A1
20120136853 Kennedy et al. May 2012 A1
20120167133 Carroll et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120179642 Sweeney et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120179751 Ahn Jul 2012 A1
20120185445 Borden et al. Jul 2012 A1
20120207346 Kohli et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120221470 Lyon Aug 2012 A1
20120227074 Hill et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120230548 Calman Sep 2012 A1
20120239690 Asikainen et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120239694 Avner et al. Sep 2012 A1
20120265735 McMillan et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120294514 Saunders et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120299961 Ramkumar et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120301105 Rehg et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120331011 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2012 A1
20130043990 Al-Jafar Feb 2013 A1
20130066856 Ong et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130067364 Berntson et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130086499 Dyor et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130089248 Remiszewski et al. Apr 2013 A1
20130103814 Carrasco Apr 2013 A1
20130151522 Aggarwal et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130159298 Mason et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130212493 Krishnamurthy Aug 2013 A1
20130226820 Sedota, Jr. Aug 2013 A1
20130226930 Amgren et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130227023 Raichelgauz et al. Aug 2013 A1
20130283401 Pabla et al. Oct 2013 A1
20130346412 Raichelgauz et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140019264 Wachman et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140025692 Pappas Jan 2014 A1
20140059443 Tabe Feb 2014 A1
20140095425 Sipple Apr 2014 A1
20140111647 Atsmon Apr 2014 A1
20140125703 Roveta et al. May 2014 A1
20140147829 Jerauld May 2014 A1
20140149918 Asokan et al. May 2014 A1
20140152698 Kim et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140156691 Conwell Jun 2014 A1
20140169681 Drake Jun 2014 A1
20140176604 Venkitaraman et al. Jun 2014 A1
20140193077 Shiiyama et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140198986 Marchesotti Jul 2014 A1
20140201330 Lopez et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140250032 Huang et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140282655 Roberts Sep 2014 A1
20140300722 Garcia Oct 2014 A1
20140330830 Raichelgauz et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140341476 Kulick et al. Nov 2014 A1
20140363044 Williams et al. Dec 2014 A1
20140379477 Sheinfeld Dec 2014 A1
20150033150 Lee Jan 2015 A1
20150052089 Kozloski et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150100562 Kohlmeier et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150117784 Lin et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150120627 Hunzinger et al. Apr 2015 A1
20150127516 Studnitzer et al. May 2015 A1
20150134688 Jing May 2015 A1
20150248586 Gaidon et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150254344 Kulkarni et al. Sep 2015 A1
20150286742 Zhang et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150286872 Medioni et al. Oct 2015 A1
20150324356 Gutierrez et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150332588 Bulan et al. Nov 2015 A1
20150363644 Wnuk Dec 2015 A1
20160007083 Gurha Jan 2016 A1
20160026707 Ong et al. Jan 2016 A1
20160132194 Grue et al. May 2016 A1
20160210525 Yang Jul 2016 A1
20160221592 Puttagunta et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160275766 Venetianer et al. Sep 2016 A1
20160306798 Guo et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160342683 Kwon Nov 2016 A1
20160357188 Ansari Dec 2016 A1
20160368440 Trollope Dec 2016 A1
20170017638 Satyavarta et al. Jan 2017 A1
20170032257 Sharifi Feb 2017 A1
20170041254 Agara Venkatesha Rao Feb 2017 A1
20170109602 Kim Apr 2017 A1
20170154241 Shambik et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170255620 Raichelgauz Sep 2017 A1
20170262437 Raichelgauz Sep 2017 A1
20170323568 Inoue Nov 2017 A1
20180081368 Watanabe Mar 2018 A1
20180101177 Cohen Apr 2018 A1
20180108258 Dilger Apr 2018 A1
20180157903 Tu et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180157916 Doumbouya Jun 2018 A1
20180158323 Takenaka Jun 2018 A1
20180189613 Wolf et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180204111 Zadeh Jul 2018 A1
20180373929 Ye Dec 2018 A1
20190005726 Nakano Jan 2019 A1
20190011922 Feng Jan 2019 A1
20190039627 Yamamoto Feb 2019 A1
20190043274 Hayakawa Feb 2019 A1
20190045244 Balakrishnan Feb 2019 A1
20190056718 Satou Feb 2019 A1
20190065951 Luo Feb 2019 A1
20190096135 Mutto et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190145765 Luo May 2019 A1
20190171912 Vallespi-Gonzalez et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190188501 Ryu Jun 2019 A1
20190220011 Della Penna Jul 2019 A1
20190279046 Han et al. Sep 2019 A1
20190304102 Chen et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190317513 Zhang Oct 2019 A1
20190364492 Azizi Nov 2019 A1
20190384303 Muller Dec 2019 A1
20190384312 Herbach Dec 2019 A1
20190385460 Magzimof Dec 2019 A1
20190389459 Berntorp Dec 2019 A1
20200004248 Healey Jan 2020 A1
20200004251 Zhu Jan 2020 A1
20200004265 Zhu Jan 2020 A1
20200005631 Visintainer Jan 2020 A1
20200018606 Wolcott Jan 2020 A1
20200018618 Ozog Jan 2020 A1
20200020212 Song Jan 2020 A1
20200050973 Stenneth Feb 2020 A1
20200073977 Montemerlo Mar 2020 A1
20200090484 Chen Mar 2020 A1
20200097756 Hashimoto Mar 2020 A1
20200133307 Kelkar Apr 2020 A1
20200043326 Tao Jun 2020 A1
20200258254 Packwood Aug 2020 A1
20200364474 Raichelgauz Nov 2020 A1
20200410252 Tsoi Dec 2020 A1
20210042592 Hashimoto Feb 2021 A1
20210229680 Chakravarty Jul 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
1085464 Jan 2007 EP
0231764 Apr 2002 WO
2003067467 Aug 2003 WO
2005027457 Mar 2005 WO
2007049282 May 2007 WO
2014076002 May 2014 WO
2014137337 Sep 2014 WO
2016040376 Mar 2016 WO
2016070193 May 2016 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (68)
Entry
Chen W, Sun Q, Wang J, Dong JJ, Xu C. A novel model based on AdaBoost and deep CNN for vehicle classification. Ieee Access. Oct. 12, 2018;6:60445-55. (Year: 2018).
Audebert N, Saux BL, Lefèvre S. On the usability of deep networks for object-based image analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.06845. Sep. 22, 2016. (Year: 2016).
Satyanarayana GS, Majhi S, Das SK. A vehicle detection technique using binary images for heterogeneous and lane-less traffic. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. Mar. 10, 2021;70:1-4. (Year: 2021).
Yao, Zhuo, Heng Wei, Zhixia Li, and Jonathan Corey. “Fuzzy c-means image segmentation approach for axle-based vehicle classification.” Transportation Research Record 2595, No. 1 (2016): 68-77. (Year: 2016).
Urazghildiiev I, Ragnarsson R, Ridderstrom P, Rydberg A, Ojefors E, Wallin K, Enochsson P, Ericson M, Lofqvist G. Vehicle classification based on the radar measurement of height profiles. IEEE Transactions on intelligent transportation systems. Jun. 4, 2007;8(2):245-53. (Year: 2007).
Refai H, Bitar N, Schettler J, Kalaa OA. The study of vehicle classification equipment with solutions to improve accuracy in Oklahoma. Oklahoma. Dept. of Transportation. Materials and Research Division; Dec. 1, 2014. (Year: 2014).
Mussa, Renatus, Valerian Kwigizile, and Majura Selekwa. “Probabilistic neural networks application for vehicle classification.” Journal of transportation engineering 132.4 (2006): 293-302. (Year: 2006).
Zhou et al, “Ensembling neural networks: Many could be better than all”, National Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, Hankou Road 22, Nanjing 210093, PR China, Available online Mar. 12, 2002, pp. 239-263.
Zhou et al, “Medical Diagnosis With C4.5 Rule Preceded by Artificial Neural Network Ensemble”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, vol. 7, Issue: 1, Mar. 2003, pp. 37-42.
Zhu et al., “Technology-Assisted Dietary Assesment”, Proc SPIE. Mar. 20, 2008, pp. 1-15.
Zou et al., “A Content-Based Image Authentication System with Lossless Data Hiding”, ICME 2003, pp. 213-216.
“Computer Vision Demonstration Website”, Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, 2005, USA.
Big Bang Theory Series 04 Episode 12, aired Jan. 6, 2011; [retrieved from Internet: ].
Boari et al, “Adaptive Routing for Dynamic Applications in Massively Parallel Architectures”, 1995 IEEE, Spring 1995, pp. 1-14.
Burgsteiner et al., “Movement Prediction from Real-World Images Using a Liquid State machine”, Innovations in Applied Artificial Intelligence Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, LNCS, Springer-Verlag, BE, vol. 3533, Jun. 2005, pp. 121-130.
Cernansky et al, “Feed-forward Echo State Networks”, Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Montreal, Canada, Jul. 31-Aug. 4, 2005, pp. 1-4.
Chinchor, Nancy A. et al.; Multimedia Analysis + Visual Analytics = Multimedia Analytics; IEEE Computer Society; 2010; pp. 52-60. (Year: 2010).
Fathy et al, “A Parallel Design and Implementation For Backpropagation Neural Network Using MIMD Architecture”, 8th Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, 19'96. MELECON '96, Date of Conference: May 13-16, 1996, vol. 3 pp. 1472-1475, vol. 3.
Freisleben et al, “Recognition of Fractal Images Using a Neural Network”, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1993, vol. 6861, 1993, pp. 631-637.
Garcia, “Solving the Weighted Region Least Cost Path Problem Using Transputers”, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, Dec. 1989.
Guo et al, AdOn: An Intelligent Overlay Video Advertising System (Year: 2009).
Hogue, “Tree Pattern Inference and Matching for Wrapper Induction on the World Wide Web”, Master's Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Jun. 2004, pp. 1-106.
Howlett et al, “A Multi-Computer Neural Network Architecture in a Virtual Sensor System Application”, International journal of knowledge-based intelligent engineering systems, 4 (2). pp. 86-93, 133N 1327-2314.
Hua et al., “Robust Video Signature Based on Ordinal Measure”, Image Processing, 2004, 2004 International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), vol. 1, IEEE, pp. 685-688, 2004.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/050471, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated May 4, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2016/054634, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated Mar. 16, 2017.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2017/015831, ISA/RU, Moscow, RU, dated Apr. 20, 2017.
Johnson et al., “Pulse-Coupled Neural Nets: Translation, Rotation, Scale, Distortion, and Intensity Signal Invariance for Images”, Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 26, 1994, pp. 6239-6253.
Lau et al., “Semantic Web Service Adaptation Model for a Pervasive Learning Scenario”, 2008 IEEE Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications, 2008, pp. 98-103.
Li et al (“Matching Commercial Clips from TV Streams Using a Unique, Robust and Compact Signature” 2005) (Year: 2005).
Lin et al., “Generating robust digital signature for image/video authentication”, Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Multimedia '98, Bristol, U.K., Sep. 1998, pp. 245-251.
Lu et al, “Structural Digital Signature for Image Authentication: An Incidental Distortion Resistant Scheme”, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 5, No. 2, Jun. 2003, pp. 161-173.
Lyon, “Computational Models of Neural Auditory Processing”, IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP '84, Date of Conference: Mar. 1984, vol. 9, pp. 41-44.
Ma Et El “Semantics modeling based image retrieval system using neural networks”, 2005.
Marian Stewart B et al., “Independent component representations for face recognition”, Proceedings of the SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology; Conference on Human Vision and Electronic Imaging III, San Jose, California, Jan. 1998, pp. 1-12.
May et al, “The Transputer”, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1989, vol. 41.
McNamara et al., “Diversity Decay in opportunistic Content Sharing Systems”, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, pp. 1-3.
Morad et al., “Performance, Power Efficiency and Scalability of Asymmetric Cluster Chip Multiprocessors”, Computer Architecture Letters, vol. 4, Jul. 4, 2005, pp. 1-4, XP002466254.
Nagy et al, “A Transputer, Based, Flexible, Real-Time Control System for Robotic Manipulators”, UKACC International Conference on CONTROL '96, Sep. 2-5, 1996, Conference Publication No. 427, IEE 1996.
Natschlager et al., “The “Liquid Computer”: A novel strategy for real-time computing on time series”, Special Issue on Foundations of Information Processing of telematik, vol. 8, No. 1, 2002, pp. 39-43, XP002466253.
Odinaev et al, “Cliques in Neural Ensembles as Perception Carriers”, Technion—Institute of Technology, 2006 International Joint Conference on neural Networks, Canada, 2006, pp. 285-292.
Ortiz-Boyer et al, “CIXL2: A Crossover Operator for Evolutionary Algorithms Based on Population Features”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24 (2005) Submitted Nov. 2004; published Jul. 2005, pp. 1-48.
Pandya etal. A Survey on QR Codes: in context of Research and Application. International Journal of Emerging Technology and U Advanced Engineering. ISSN 2250-2459, ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal, vol. 4, Issue 3, Mar. 2014 (Year: 2014).
Queluz, “Content-Based Integrity Protection of Digital Images”, SPIE Conf. on Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents, San Jose, Jan. 1999, pp. 85-93.
Rui, Yong et al. “Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval.” IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 8.5 (1998): 644-655.
Santos et al., “SCORM-MPEG: an Ontology of Interoperable Metadata for multimediaand E-Learning”, 23rd International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCom), 2015, pp. 224-228.
Scheper et al, “Nonlinear dynamics in neural computation”, ESANN'2006 proceedings—European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, Bruges (Belgium), Apr. 26-28, 2006, d-side publication, ISBN 2-930307-06-4, pp. 1-12.
Schneider et al, “A Robust Content based Digital Signature for Image Authentication”, Proc. ICIP 1996, Lausane, Switzerland, Oct. 1996, pp. 227-230.
Srihari et al., “Intelligent Indexing and Semantic Retrieval of Multimodal Documents”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, May 2000, vol. 2, Issue 2-3, pp. 245-275.
Srihari, Rohini K. “Automatic indexing and content-based retrieval of captioned images” Computer 0 (1995): 49-56.
Stolberg et al (“HIBRID-SOC: A Multi-Core Soc Architecture for Multimedia Signal Processing” (2003).
Stolberg et al, “HIBRID-SOC: A Mul Ti-Core SOC Architecture for Mul Timedia Signal Processing”, 2003 IEEE, pp. 189-194.
Theodoropoulos et al, “Simulating Asynchronous Architectures on Transputer Networks”, Proceedings of the Fourth Euromicro Workshop On Parallel and Distributed Processing, 1996. PDP '96, pp. 274-281.
Vallet et al (“Personalized Content Retrieval in Context Using Ontological Knowledge” Mar. 2007) (Year: 2007).
Verstraeten et al, “Isolated word recognition with the Liquid State Machine: a case study”, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 41, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Available onlline Jul. 14, 2005, pp. 521-528.
Wang et al., “Classifying Objectionable Websites Based onImage Content”, Stanford University, pp. 1-12.
Ware et al, “Locating and Identifying Components in a Robot's Workspace using a Hybrid Computer Architecture” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, Aug. 27-29, 1995, pp. 139-144.
Whitby-Strevens, “The transputer”, 1985 IEEE, pp. 292-300.
Wilk et al., “The Potential of Social-Aware Multimedia Prefetching on Mobile Devices”, International Conference and Workshops on networked Systems (NetSys), 2015, pp. 1-5.
Yanagawa et al, “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts”, Columbia University ADVENT Technical Report # 222-2006-8, Mar. 20, 2007, pp. 1-17.
Yanagawa et al., “Columbia University's Baseline Detectors for 374 LSCOM Semantic Visual Concepts”, Columbia University ADVENT Technical Report #222, 2007, pp. 2006-2008.
Jasinschi et al., A Probabilistic Layered Framework for Integrating Multimedia Content and Context Information, 2002, IEEE, p. 2057-2060. (Year: 2002).
Jones et al., “Contextual Dynamics of Group-Based Sharing Decisions”, 2011, University of Bath, p. 1777-1786. (Year: 2011).
Iwamoto, “Image Signature Robust to Caption Superimpostion for Video Sequence Identification”, IEEE, pp. 3185-3188 (Year: 2006).
Cooperative Multi-Scale Convolutional Neural, Networks for Person Detection, Markus Eisenbach, Daniel Seichter, Tim Wengefeld, and Horst-Michael Gross Ilmenau University of Technology, Neuroinformatics and Cognitive Robotics Lab (Year; 2016).
Chen, Yixin, James Ze Wang, and Robert Krovetz. “CLUE: cluster-based retrieval of images by unsupervised learning.” IEEE transactions on Image Processing 14.8 (2005); 1187-1201. (Year: 2005).
Wusk et al (Non-Invasive detection of Respiration and Heart Rate with a Vehicle Seat Sensor; www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors; Published: May 8, 2018). (Year: 2018).
Chen, Tiffany Yu-Han, et al. “Glimpse: Continuous, real-time object recognition on mobile devices.” Proceedings of the 13th ACM Confrecene on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 2015. (Year: 2015).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210303876 A1 Sep 2021 US