This invention relates to a method for transmitting digital data on a communication channel.
It more specifically relates to a method for transmitting digital data on a communication channel, between a transmitter base comprising transmission antennas of index n, where n is between 1 and N and N is an integer greater than or equal to 1, and at least one receiver of index k, where k is between 1 and K and K is an integer greater than or equal to 1, each comprising at least one receiving antenna, a method wherein a signal carrier of frequency fo is used to transport the digital data on the communication channel, and sub-carriers are used of index m, where m is between 1 and M and M is an integer greater than or equal to 1, adapted to transport K streams of digital data sk in parallel from the transmitter base, each stream of digital data sk being intended for each receiver of index k.
In the communication channel, the transmitted signals simultaneously follow a multitude of different paths and are subject to reflection. Each receiving antenna receives a signal which is a superposition of a multitude of signals corresponding to this multitude of paths between the transmitter base and each receiver, such that interference phenomena occur which, in certain positions of a receiver antenna, can interfere with or cancel out the signal received by the receiver.
Transmission methods are known which use multi-carrier modulation, such as OFDM (for Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) which consists of multiplexing digital data onto frequency sub-carriers in order to transport the data on a communication channel. These sub-carriers are frequency-spaced and are orthogonal to each other to reduce interference.
At the same throughput as a single carrier modulation method, the signals have longer temporal durations and echoes in the communication channel have a reduced effect, meaning that there is less intersymbol interference (ISI) between consecutive symbols.
Although such multi-carrier methods are very advantageous, they do not completely cancel the interference problem, and it is common, for example, to add a guard space period between each symbol sent, which inevitably leads to a slower bandwidth.
However, bandwidth demand is constantly increasing, which means there is a need to reduce the time interval for digital data on the communication channel.
One purpose of the invention is to improve upon these methods and overcome the disadvantages described above.
To do so, the method of the invention comprises the following steps:
(a1) each of the K streams of digital data sk are transformed into M parallel streams sk(m) of symbols, each of the parallel streams being intended for a sub-carrier of index m,
(b1) N.M complex symbols tn(m) are calculated from the K.M symbols sk(m), by:
where
Because of these measures, particularly the processing in step (b1), the method of the invention offers at least the following advantages:
In addition, step (b1) is a way of approximating a convolution integral between a time signal sk(t) to be transmitted on the communication channel and a time reversal of the impulse response hk,n(t), where Hk,n(m) are complex values estimating the amplitude and phase of the impulse response hk,n(t) at the frequencies of each sub-carrier of index m. The reader may refer to patent FR-2 748 137 for this communication technique. By using multiplexed sub-carriers, the time calculation of this prior art document is achieved at a lower computational cost because the information is in the frequency domain and substantially improves the OFDM multi-carrier technique because the ISI is further reduced. These two techniques are therefore advantageously combined.
In various embodiments of the method for transmitting digital data according to the invention, one or more of the following measures may additionally be used:
where
where
where
where
where
where
where
where
The invention also relates to a transmitter base comprising:
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following description of one of its embodiments, provided as a non-limiting example with reference to the attached drawings.
In the drawings:
OFDM is used in particular in digital audio broadcasting (DAB) and digital video broadcasting (DVB), wired networks (DSL), wireless networks (WIFI), and cell phone communication networks (UMTS).
In the transmission device 10, the letter s indicates digital data to be serially transmitted on the communication channel. These digital data s are, for example, binary information.
A demultiplexer 11 performs a serial-parallel conversion, and converts, at a time of index j, this serial stream of digital data s into M parallel streams of symbols sj(m), denoted sj(1), sj(2) to sj(M). These M parallel streams of symbols sj(m) have a transmission temporal rate M times slower than the serial stream of digital data s. Each of these parallel streams of symbols sj(m) is intended to be sent over a sub-carrier of index m of the bandwidth. At a time of index j, a vector sj of components sj(m) where m is between 1 and M, is called the OFDM symbol. Its duration is of a period Ts, while the duration of a digital data item in the serial stream s is Ts/M.
An inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) 12 transforms these symbols sj(m) into transformed symbols uj(m), denoted uj(1), uj(2) to uj(M). In particular:
where
i is the complex number defined by i=√{square root over (−1)},
j is an index corresponding to a time interval during which a OFDM symbol is transmitted, and
m is an index corresponding to a sub-carrier.
A multiplexer 13 performs a parallel-serial transform, and transforms the M parallel streams of transformed symbols uj(m) into a single serial stream uj,. of the same transformed symbols.
A modulator 14, such as a quadrature modulator, modulates the signal carrier at a frequency f0 to generate a modulated signal uj,m(t), continuous over time,from the serial stream uj of transformed symbols. In the case of complex digital data and the use of quadrature modulation, one obtains:
uj,m(t)=(uj(m).e2iπf,t)
uj,m(t)=(uj(m)). cos(2πf0t)−τ(uj(m)). sin(2πf0t) (2)
where
Next a transmission filter 15 transforms this modulated signal uj,m(t) into a filtered signal vj,m(t), which leads to:
where
The transmission filter can be a simple rectangular wave form of duration Ts/M or advantageously it can be such a waveform convoluted by a frequency lowpass filter or a passband filter, adapted to apply an amplification and limit the frequency bandwidth of the transmission signal.
A transmission signal v(t) corresponds to the filtered signal vj,m(t) for all OFDM symbol indexes j and for all sub-carrier indexes m, meaning:
The steps between the calculation of the inverse fast Fourier transforms of an OFDM symbol and the formation of the transmission signal v(t) can be referred to as multi-carrier modulation. The calculation of the inverse fast Fourier transform of the OFDM symbol avoids the use of M modulators at the frequencies of the sub-carriers m, which would require extremely good synchronization. The multi-carrier modulation is therefore done with an inverse fast Fourier transform and only one modulator using a signal carrier at frequency f0.
This transmission signal v(t) is then adapted to be transmitted by a transmission antenna 16 on the communication channel.
Such processing allows performing the digital equivalent of a multi-carrier modulation, as each symbol sj(m) is modulated over a sub-carrier of index m of the carrier of frequency f0.
In the receiving device 20, a receiving antenna 26 receives a signal transmitted on the communication channel and provides a continuous signal w(t).
A receiving filter 25 and a demodulator 24 deliver a serial stream x of digital data.
This serial stream x of digital data then undergoes a serial-parallel transformation by the demultiplexer 23, to provide M parallel streams of symbols xj(m), denoted xj (1), xj (2) to xj(M). For time interval j, a vector xj of components xj(m), where m is between 1 and M, is called the received OFDM symbol.
A fast Fourier transform 22 provides M streams of symbols yj(m), denoted yj(1), yj(2) to yj(M):
A parallel-serial transformation by the multiplexer 21 then provides the received digital data y. This diagram for the receiving device 20 is therefore a diagram symmetrical to the diagram for the transmitting device 10.
The receiving digital data y are equal to the transmission digital data s, multiplied by a complex coefficient corresponding to the complex value of the transfer function of the communication channel at the frequency considered. Many known techniques for channel estimation are usable for determining these complex values.
The transmission device 10 can be supplemented upstream by a binary coding step and/or an error correction coding step. Many known methods for binary encoding exist: m-state phase modulation coding, denoted PMm, or quadrature amplitude modulation encoding, denoted QAMm. Many known methods exist for error correction coding, in which redundant data are added to the data to be transmitted in order to detect and/or correct transmission errors in the communication channel.
Reciprocally, the receiving device 20 can be supplemented downstream by a binary decoding step and/or an error correction decoding step.
Also, such a transmission method using OFDM technology can be more generally applied by using it with a MIMO (Multi Input Multi Output) device comprising several transmission antennas and several receiving antennas. In such systems, the intention is generally to increase the communication throughput between the transmitter base and a receiver having several receiving antennas.
Using this OFDM technology, signals are sent in parallel in the communication channel on different sub-carriers. This reduces noise related to echoes on the communication channel, and there is little intersymbol interference (ISI) between consecutive symbols.
The transmitter base 30 comprises a plurality of digital data inputs of index k, where k is between 1 and K, each forming an independent stream of digital data sk intended for a particular receiver of the same index. We therefore have a single transmitter base 30 adapted to send distinct digital data to K receivers. These K receivers are located at different positions in space. The communication channel between the transmitter base 30 and the receivers then has different transfer functions between said transmitter base and each receiver of index k.
Each digital data stream sk supplies data to a demultiplexer 311, 312, to 31K, which converts each stream of symbols sk into M parallel streams of digital data sk(m). For example, for the first stream of digital data s1, the demultiplexer 311 generates the parallel streams s1 (m) of symbols, denoted s1(1) to s1(M).
In
In addition, these transformation steps are performed at a time interval j as it was in the method described above, but the j indexes are omitted for clarity in the equations.
A calculation unit 36 then converts the K.M parallel streams of symbols sk(m) into N.M parallel streams of complex symbols tn(m), where n is an index between 1 and N, using the following calculation:
where
We will discuss further below the calculation of this normalization coefficient αk.
One will see that it is advantageous to have N>K in this calculation, meaning a number of transmission antennas which is greater than the number of receiving antennas.
The calculation unit 36 performs a particular type of pre-equalization of the digital data. We will provide explanations further below of the effects of this calculation in the transmitter base 30.
The complex symbols tn(m) can be organized into N vectors tn, each of them corresponding to a OFDM symbol as described above. This OFDM symbol is then also processed in the same manner.
N inverse fast Fourier transforms 321 to 32N transform the N.M parallel streams of complex symbols tn(m) into N.M parallel streams of transformed complex symbols un(m) by using N equations of the type in (1), which can be rewritten as follows:
N multiplexers 331 to 33N then transform these N.M parallel streams of transformed complex symbols un(m) into N serial streams of transformed complex symbols un,m, which are then synchronously modulated to the frequency f0 of a carrier by modulators 341 to 34N in order to generate the modulated signals un,m(t). For example, for a quadrature modulation, we can write:
un,m(t)=(un(m).e2iπf
These modulated signals un,m(t) are then filtered by filters 351 to 35N to generate the filtered signals vn,m(t):
The N transmission signals vn(t) for each transmission antenna 361 to 36N can then be calculated by a double sum over the j indexes (OFDM symbols) and the m indexes (sub-carriers):
or in other words:
Each transmission signal vn(t) then supplies data to one of the N transmission antennas 361 to 36N.
The transmitter base 30 therefore performs a first conversion step in a calculation unit 36, then carries out in parallel N multi-carrier modulations all synchronized on the signal carrier of frequency f0, to produce the transmission signals vn(t).
Each receiver used with the communication base 30 is substantially identical to the receiving device 20 described in
It receives on its receiving antenna 26 a signal which it transforms to produce a stream of receiver digital data zk at antenna k, of the type:
where c is a complex constant representing the presumably linear transformations of inverse fast Fourier transforms, modulation, demodulation, and Fourier transforms.
By replacing tn(m) with the expression from formula (1) and inverting the sums we obtain:
For example, in the case of the first receiver (k=1), the above formula is expanded as follows:
In this sum the first term is non-zero, and the following terms are small, and grow smaller as N grows larger. Thus we can write:
In general, we obtain:
This formula (12) means that each stream of digital data sk intended for antenna k is focused on the antenna k in order to provide a stream of receiver data zk which does not have interference from the other digital data streams.
The normalization coefficient αk of formula (5) can be a predetermined constant.
In a first variant, the normalization coefficient αk is calculated such that a mean power Π transmitted by the transmitter base 30 over the sub-carriers of index m is independent of the receivers k and has a value α.
The mean power Π is equal to:
Π=tn(m).tn*(m)
Formula (5) can be written as follows:
We have:
because: sk(m)s*k′(m)=s(m)2δk,k′ where < > represents the mean for the symbols, |s(m)|2 is the variance of the symbols, and s(m)=0.
The value α of the normalization coefficient is then calculated by:
where
In a second variant, the normalization coefficient αk is calculated to obtain a received signal amplitude that is identical on each receiving antenna k.
The symbols received on each receiver k are then:
and
Its energy is:
It is desirable if all amplitudes are the same for all receiving antennas.
The transmitted power Π can then be calculated by:
The normalization coefficient αk of formula (5) can then be calculated by:
where
In a third variant, the normalization coefficient αk is calculated by generalizing the above calculation, in order to obtain a predetermined power value for each receiving antenna.
The symbols received at each receiver k are then:
and
Its energy is:
The transmitted power Π can then be calculated by:
The normalization coefficient αk of the formula (5) can then be calculated by:
where
In the following variants, only the phase of the transfer of the communication channel Hk,n(m) is used (as the modulus is considered to be equal to 1) when calculating the N.M complex symbols tn(m). We therefore have:
In a fourth variant, similar to the first variant, but in which only the phase of the transfer of the communication channel Hk,n(m) is used, the value α of the normalization coefficient is then calculated by:
where
In a fifth variant, similar to the second variant, but in which only the phase of the transfer of the communication channel Hk,n(m) is used, the symbols received on each receiver k are received while disregarding inter-user interference, meaning the interference between each receiving antenna k:
and
Its energy is:
It is desirable if all amplitudes are the same for all receiving antennas.
The transmitted power Π can then be calculated by:
The normalization coefficient αk of formula (5) can then be calculated by:
where
In a sixth variant, similar to the third variant but in which only the phase of the transfer of the communication channel Hk,n(m) is used, the symbols received on each receiver k are then:
and
Its energy is:
The transmitted power Π can then be calculated by:
The normalization coefficient αk of formula (5) can then be calculated by:
where
Lastly, a receiver base of the invention can then be realized using the same principles. It will comprise a calculation unit preceding OFDM demodulators which each comprise a fast Fourier transform.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2009/052154 | 11/9/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/18/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/055024 | 5/12/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
7636297 | Lee et al. | Dec 2009 | B1 |
20050078769 | Lo | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050180312 | Walton et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20070177681 | Choi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070258394 | Hamaguchi | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291867 | Khan et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080267138 | Walton et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Persefoni Kyritsi, George Papanicolaou, Patrick Eggers and Alex Oprea, “MISO time reversal and delay spread compression for FWA channels at 5GHz”, Stanford University, Aalborg University, IEEE, 2004. |
Persefoni Kyritsi, Patrick Eggers and Alex Oprea, “MISO Time Reversal and Time Compression”, Aalborg University, Waverider Communications, 2004. |
Gomes, J. et al., “Experimental assessment of time-reversed OFDM underwater communications,” Accoustics '08, Paris (Jun. 29-Jul. 4, 2008) pp. 1-6. |
Gomes, J. et al., “OFDM Demodulation in Underwater Time-Reversed Shortened Channels,” Oceans (Sep. 15, 2008) pp. 1-6. |
Gomes, J. et al, “Time-Reversed OFDM Communication in Underwater Channels,” Fifth IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications , Lisbon (Jul. 11-14, 2004) pp, 1-5. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 2, 2010 for PCT/FR2009/052154. |
Koike-Akino, T. et al, “Unified Analysis of Linear Block Precoding for Distributed Antenna Systems,” IEEE Globalcom 2009 Telecommunications Conference Proceedings (Nov. 30, 2009) pp. 1-6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120207234 A1 | Aug 2012 | US |