This is a U.S. national stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/F12018/050215, filed on Mar. 22, 2018, which claims priority to Finnish Patent Application No. 20175301, filed on Mar. 31, 2017, the entire contents of all of which are fully incorporated herein by reference.
The present disclosure is directed to a method for transporting a tail end in a fiber web machine from one structural section to another in such a way that it is guided from the transfer plates by means of an air flow. The disclosure also relates to an apparatus and to the use of it.
Various solutions are known in the art that are aimed at improving the transfer of a tail end from one structural section to another. Web feeding in fiber web machines, such as in paper machines and board machines, is to an increasing extent air-assisted. They are safe and generally also operationally reliable, as well as being inexpensive to build and use. Solutions known in the art have had a number of drawbacks, e.g. an advantageous airflow speed has not been achieved to the transfer plates. In this respect, the efficiency of apparatus today has not essentially improved. The state-of-the-art is described in applications FI20145349, FI20060757 and also in patents FI 123352 an FI 122377.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a new type of solution for managing web threading in the different parts of the machine, and for different speeds and grades. The solution now utilizes airflow theory more efficiently and at the same time the operation of the apparatus is optimized; the airflow of the blown air can now be directed more accurately at the guide plate. By means of the invention, an even curtain of air can be formed on the guide plate without friction.
More precisely specified, the invention is characterized by what is stated in the claims.
In the following, the invention will be described in more detail with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
According to
Broadly interpreting the state-of-the-art, as an illustrative concept the solution can be generally compared to the functioning of the top part of an airplane wing. The aerodynamic profile of the bump 3 guides the air flow 4 of the blown air 2. From the standpoint of the invention, however, what is essential is the technical solution with which the air flow 4 of the blown air 2 can be guided onto the surface of the guide plate 1 and how the air flow 4 is controlled in its entirety.
The purpose of the invention is that the air flow 4 of the blown air 2 is guided along the streamlined surface 5 of the bump 3 functioning as an aerodynamic profile. The air flow 4 of the blown air 2 follows the shape of the surface 5 of the bump 3 and keeps the airflow 4 under the control of the surface 5. In other words, the air flow 4 of the blown air 2 is made to cling to the surface of the bump 3 and to follow it by means of the curved guide plate 1. In this way, the air flow 4 of the blown air 2 adheres to the surface 5 and the tail end 6 can be guided in the direction of the curved guide plate 1.
According to
According to
From the standpoint of the invention, completely new opportunities are created in particular by the possibility of guiding the blown air 2 onto the surface of the curved guide plate 1 at a negative angle −α, i.e. the airflow 4 of the blown air 2 is made to collide with the surface 5 of the bump 3 at the desired point. With this arranged collision, it is possible to modify the spreading of the air being blown onto the surface of the guide plate 1 in exactly the manner desired and to guide it onwards onto the tail end 6. Most typically, this brings about a more even distribution of the force pulling the tail end 6, such as a paper tail, i.e. the force is not so point-formed.
From the standpoint of the invention, the aforementioned angle +/−α between the blown air 2 and guide plate 1 is −50°-+5° degrees; it can vary greatly depending on the different operating sites. In principle, even a +20° positive angle could be used, although certainly in practice from the standpoint of the invention the most favorable angle +/−α is in the range −15°-+5° and the optimum angle −5°-+5°. By way of illustration,
A solution is sought in the invention for the shape of the guide plate 1 for transporting a tail end 6 in a fiber web machine. It is important for the invention that the air flow 4 strongly follows the shape of the curve, very close to the surface 5 of the curve, without appreciably trying to disperse away from the surface of the curve. This is an important advantage, because in a flat tail end the air mattress tries to become thicker on the surface of the plate as a function of the distance from the blowing nozzle. The curved shape of the guide plate 1 minimizes this effect and keeps the air mattress thin. This considerably improves the control of the tail 6 in threading and enables the use of smaller air volumes, which in turn improves the energy efficiency of this solution. Important observations were made in test runs, and by means of technical solutions the shape of the curved guide plate 1 was optimized in such a way that the air flow 4 of the blown air 2 follows the streamlined shape of the surface 5 of the bump 3 functioning as an aerodynamic profile and keeps the airflow 4 under the control of the surface 5.
Owing to what is presented above, the shape of the curved guide plate 1 is difficult to specify on the basis of just the dimensions; more particularly, an unambiguous mathematical definition of the shape of the curve is difficult. This is made more difficult, also, because the curved shape of the guide plate 1 varies depending on the application. That being the case, the shape of both the bump 3 and of the surface 5 of the curved guide plate 1, and the length L, height H and angle β of the curve, as well as the radius R are dimensioned on a case-by-case basis in the manner required by different applications, and are finally tailored on-site to be optimal.
The height H of the bump 3 means the difference of the nozzle 8 of the discharge aperture and the surface 5 of the bump 3. What is essential is the difference of the surface 5 in relation to the nozzle 8 of the discharge aperture, i.e. that it is situated at some desired height H. In other words, depending on the point at which the nozzles 8 of the discharge apertures are situated, the nozzles 8 can be higher, lower or at the same height with respect to the surface 5; this dimension is defined as the height H. In the exemplary embodiment, the height H of the bump 3 from the plane surface is 0.1-50 mm, most preferably 2-10 mm, in this exemplary embodiment H=6 mm.
The angle β between the blown air 2 and the surface of the guide plate 1 after the bump 3 is selected freely according to the different points. More precisely specified, the angle β is the contact angle or rounding of the bump 3 and the curved guide plate 1. In this exemplary embodiment, β=13°, in other words, the angle β between the blown air 2 and the surface of the guide plate 1 after the bump 3 is positive, i.e. bends in a slope downwards, the angle is +β. Another alternative is the embodiment according to
In the embodiment of
In addition to this, the nozzles 8 of the air discharge apertures of the blown air 2 can be formed in a number of ways. According to one embodiment of the invention, the quantity of nozzles 8 required by the usage location are installed at different points of the curved guide plate 1.
Furthermore, the nozzles 8 can blow at different angles +/−α onto the surface of the curved guide plate 1, depending on the type of nozzle 8 and on the task. According to one embodiment of the invention, some of the nozzles 8 are pull nozzles, in other words the maximum tension force is sought, and some are hold nozzles with which controllability is managed.
One preferred embodiment is the solution according to
According to
According to what is presented in the preceding, from the standpoint of the invention an essential embodiment is when the blown air 2 can be guided onto the surface 5 of the curved guide plate 1 without any shoulder or angle α (0°), and without producing any friction. This way, the maximum tension force is achieved. With solutions according to the state-of-the-art this is impossible; there is always a blowing angle between the guide plate and the bores of the nozzles. It is technically impossible to bore holes in the nozzles in exactly the same direction as the surface of a flat plate. For example, in specification FI 123352, in which the angle between the blowing direction of the bores and the guide plate must be between +5°-+30° degrees. Essential improvements are achieved with the solution according to the invention compared to the prior art presented above, in which the air discharges through the plates at a small angle to the bored holes.
The invention can also be applied in two ways; either in such a way that the nozzles 8 of the air discharge apertures of the blown air 2 are prefabricated in the curved guide plate 1. This type of nozzle structure 8, which is made as a fixed part of the curved guide plate 1, is suited according to
Another very important embodiment is presented in
It is obvious to the person skilled in the art that the invention is not limited to the embodiments presented above, but that it can be varied within the scope of the claims presented below.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20175301 | Mar 2017 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2018/050215 | 3/22/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/178511 | 10/4/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3705676 | Overly et al. | Dec 1972 | A |
4014487 | Reba | Mar 1977 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9109313 | Sep 1991 | DE |
102008002346 | Dec 2009 | DE |
78528 | Apr 1989 | FI |
115233 | Mar 2005 | FI |
124219 | May 2014 | FI |
20145349 | Oct 2015 | FI |
1509506 | May 1978 | GB |
9803418 | Jan 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Machine Translation of DE 91 09 313 U1, Sep. 26, 1991. (Year: 1991). |
International Preliminary Report and Written Opinion on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/FI2018/050215, dated Oct. 10, 2019 (8 pages). |
Office Action for Finish Application No. 20175301, dated Nov. 30, 2017 (6 pages). |
Search Report for Finish Application No. 20175301, dated Nov. 30, 2017 (2 pages). |
Office Action for Finish Application No. 20175301, dated Jul. 12, 2018 (1 page). |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/FI2018/050215, dated Jul. 3, 2018 (5 pages). |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/FI2018/050215, dated Jul. 3, 2018 (7 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200031600 A1 | Jan 2020 | US |