This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to French Patent Application Serial No. FR 1055002, filed Jun. 23, 2010.
The present invention relates to methods for treating parts made from decomposable semiconductor materials, and particularly, to methods for detaching surface films from the rest of the part, and even more particularly, where the material has a composition AlxGayIn1-x-yN, where 0≦x≦1, 0≦y≦1 and x+y≦1.
Semiconductors of the III-N type, that is, having the general formula AlxGayIn1-x-yN where 0≦x≦1, 0≦y≦1 and x+y≦1, and, in particular, GaN, have features that make them highly attractive for the optoelectronic, power and radiofrequency applications. However, the development of these applications is hampered by technico-economic limits of AlxGayIn1-x-yN substrates, which are not readily available.
III-N devices are, therefore, commonly fabricated on a substrate formed by the transfer to a support substrate of a thin film taken from a donor substrate of high-grade III-N material suitable for the intended application. The poor availability of AlxGayIn1-x-yN substrates is thus offset by the possibility of using a donor substrate repeatedly.
The S
However, because fracturing substrates made from III-N material requires doses of atomic or ionic species, which are five to ten times higher than in silicon, such processes typically have substantially higher costs than similar processes in silicon.
It can be appreciated, therefore, that it would be advantageous to develop methods for detaching thin films from substrates made from III-N material that overcome these limitations of available processes, for example, being less costly.
In view of the above, the present invention provides processes for treating parts comprising a thermally decomposable material, which includes the steps of:
According to other features of this method:
Additional features and advantages of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawings. In the description, reference is made to the accompanying figures that are meant to illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention. It is understood that such embodiments do not represent the full scope of the invention. Further aspects and details, and alternative combinations of the elements, of this invention that will be apparent from the following detailed description to one of ordinary skill in the art are also understood to be within the scope of this invention.
The present invention may be understood more fully by reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention, illustrative examples of specific embodiments of the invention and the appended figures in which:
The present invention applies to parts made from compound semiconductor materials that are liable to decompose under the effect of an energy input, especially an energy input by a particle flux.
The term “compound material” is used herein to refer to material consisting of at least two types of atoms. Typically, these atoms are Group III atoms, e.g., gallium, aluminum, indium, etc., and the most preferred compound material has the composition AlxGayIn1-x-yN, where 0≦x≦1, 0≦y≦1 and x+y≦1. This material is typically formed by deposition on a growth support made from, e.g., sapphire.
The term “decomposition” is used herein to refer to a modification of the inherent structure of the material, which may, depending on the material, consist of a chemical transformation, a phase separation, an embrittlement, the creation of new phases, a localized fusion, etc.
The term “part” is used herein to refer not only to compound materials in the form of a wafer or other substrate that can be used in the electronic, optical or optoelectronic industry, but also to compound materials in other forms, e.g., an ingot, a ball, or any other shape, having at least one surface across which the particle flux can be applied. Preferably, the roughness amplitude of such a surface is significantly lower than the penetration depth of the particles.
In the non-limiting, preferred embodiment described below with reference to
According to the present invention, the part is treated by applying a particle flux 3 in the form of a burst of short duration and very high-intensity on the substrate 1. Such a short, high-intensity particle flux is also referred to herein as a “pulse.” The pulse duration is preferably between about 10 nanoseconds and a few microseconds, for example, 10 ns. The power flux density is preferably between about 1×106 and a few 107 W/cm2.
Preferably, light particles having a low atomic number are selected, for example, having an atomic number of one, two or three, so that the energy deposited inside the material is, for the most part, extracted from the particle pulse by braking due to electron interactions and not by atomic collisions. The latter are undesirable because they might generate defects. Preferably, the particles 3 are selected from light, ionic (positively or negatively charged) or neutral particles, for example: H, H+, He, He+, their isotopes, H−, or electrons (either alone or combined together).
With this choice of the type of particles, and as shown in the graph in
If the flux burst is of sufficiently short duration, e.g., being in the above-mentioned duration range, the energy deposition can be considered as adiabatic, that is, practically without any heat transfer elsewhere than in the target area. In the absence of energy transfer from the target area, the temperature elevation profile generated by the flux in the substrate is similar to the energy deposition profile.
The adiabaticity criterion can be estimated rapidly by comparing the half-thickness of the energy deposition profile with the thermal diffusion length during the pulse duration, where the thermal diffusion length can be approximated as the square root of the pulse duration times the thermal diffusivity. If the half-thickness of the energy deposition profile is less than the thermal diffusion length during the pulse duration, then the adiabaticity criterion can be considered to be satisfied.
Consider an example where the half-thickness is 1 μm of the energy deposition profile, where the pulse duration is 400 ns, and where the thermal diffusivity is 0.1 cm2/s. then the thermal diffusion length is:
√{square root over (100·10−9·0.1)}=10−4 cm=
√{square root over (400·10−9·0.1)}=2·10 −4 cm=2 μm
Since 1 μm<2 μm, the adiabaticity criterion can be considered to be satisfied for this example.
However, if the particle flux is not applied under adiabatic conditions, the temperature profile resulting from the energy deposition by the particles is less peaked and more spread out than the energy deposition profile.
It may be possible to reduce the particle flux density if the substrate is pre-heated prior to implantation to an initial temperature (also referred to as the “bottom temperature”), which is lower than the temperature at which the material starts to decompose. With such pre-heating, the ion beam is only required to provide the additional energy in the vicinity of the targeted area that is sufficient to raise the temperature from the initial temperature to at least the decomposition temperature.
It may also be possible to reduce the particle flux density where the profile of the energy peak stands out clearly, that is, typically with a ratio higher than 2 between the height of this peak and the surface energy level. This is typically the case with high-energy implantations.
The particle treatment can be carried out using machines producing particle beams that have a temporal steady-state intensity, that are highly focused, and that can be scanned at high speed on the surface of the substrate. With such beams, any one location experiences a pulse of particles depending on the beam size and scanning speed. Alternatively, particle beams can be used that are spatially uniform across the surface of the part but temporally pulsed.
Preferred equipment includes continuous focused beam machines and very high-power pulsed beam machines.
In further preferred embodiments illustrated in
The methods of this invention find particular application when the material contains gallium, which has the particular feature of having a melting point lower than 50° C. In fact, after the application of a stiffener, a film can be detached after the heated area returns to ambient temperature, because the gallium liquid phase thereby created allows such a detachment, by the application of small mechanical forces and/or a slight heat treatment.
For example, suitable conditions for the bombardment of a GaN substrate by H+ ions are:
In general, these conditions lead to an implanted dose during the treatment that is typically between a few 1012 and a few 1013 particles/cm−2. It should be noted that this dose is much lower than that used to embrittle a silicon substrate for the application of a S
The word “about” (and other words of approximation or degree) are used herein to mean within acceptable and expected limits, usually commercially acceptable limits and ranges. The limits and ranges signified by these terms depend on commercial requirements (or research requirements, or the like) and can vary, but in all cases are not to be construed as imposing requirements beyond what are currently achievable given a current state-of-the-art.
The preferred embodiments of the invention described above do not limit the scope of the invention, since these embodiments are illustrations of several preferred aspects of the invention. Any equivalent embodiments are intended to be within the scope of this invention. Indeed, various modifications of the invention, in addition to those shown and described herein, such as alternative useful combinations of the elements described, will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the subsequent description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Headings and legends are used herein for clarity and convenience only.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 55002 | Jun 2010 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5374564 | Bruel | Dec 1994 | A |
5994207 | Henley et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6225192 | Aspar et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6287941 | Kang et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6355541 | Holland et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387829 | Usenko et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6632482 | Sheng | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6794276 | Letertre et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6809009 | Aspar et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6809044 | Aspar et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6913971 | Aspar et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6964914 | Ghyselen et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6979630 | Walitzki | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6995075 | Usenko | Feb 2006 | B1 |
6995430 | Langdo et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7008859 | Letertre et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7011707 | Nagai et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7067396 | Aspar et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7112243 | Koike et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7148124 | Usenko | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7199401 | Tazima et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7259388 | Langdo et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7282381 | Feltin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7297612 | Langdo et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7332030 | Bruel | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7449394 | Akatsu et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7498234 | Aspar et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7498245 | Aspar et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7575988 | Bourdelle et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588994 | Langdo et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7615468 | Boussagol et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7670930 | Tauzin et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7772087 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7772088 | Henley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7811902 | Kim | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7838392 | Langdo et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7839001 | Boussagol et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7883994 | Moriceau et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7939428 | Boussagol et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7943485 | Francis et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8026534 | Langdo et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8093686 | Garnier | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8101503 | Aspar et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8124499 | Henley et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8183082 | Lewis et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8222119 | Henley | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8241996 | Henley et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8252663 | Fournel | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8309431 | Nguyen et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8470712 | Moriceau et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8481409 | Moriceau et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8557679 | Chuang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8679946 | Moriceau et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8765577 | Bedell et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
20020014407 | Allen et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030008475 | Cheung et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040248380 | Aulnette et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040262686 | Shaheen et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050196937 | Daval et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050269671 | Faure et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060063353 | Akatsu | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060079071 | Moriceau et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060189020 | Kim | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205180 | Henley et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070072396 | Feltin et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070176210 | Murphy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080014714 | Bourdelle et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080064182 | Hebras | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080303033 | Brandes | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100025228 | Tauzin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100244196 | Yoshida | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110315664 | Bruel | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20130072009 | Bruel | Mar 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 858 110 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 924 769 | Jun 1999 | EP |
2002474 | Dec 2008 | EP |
2 853 991 | Oct 2004 | FR |
2 910 179 | Jun 2008 | FR |
WO 2007110515 | Oct 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
French Search Report, FR 1055002, mailed Oct. 5, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110315664 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |