1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to spinal implantations and in particular to a dynamic stabilization device configured for the spine.
2. Description of Related Art
Methods of spinal stabilization have previously been proposed. Previous methods have incorporated various components configured to provide some type of flexibility. Jahng et al. (U.S. patent number 2005/0203513) teaches a spinal stabilization device. The stabilization device includes a longitudinal member having first and second ends as well as a flexible section disposed between the first and second ends. Jahng further teaches a cross sectional profile for the flexible section that is different than the cross sectional profiles of the first and second ends. Jahng teaches a flexible section that includes spiral cut grooves to improve flexibility.
Generally, spiral cut grooves may not provide the same degree of flexibility and support as a spring. Methods of spinal stabilization including screws have also been proposed. Timm et al. (U.S. patent number 2005/0171543) is directed to a system for effecting multi-level spine stabilization. Timm teaches a system including a plurality of pedicle screws that are joined by rods. Timm further teaches that at least one of the rods includes a dynamic stabilizing member. Timm teaches an inner first spring and an outer second spring. In the Timm design, the inner first spring is generally disposed within the outer second spring. Timm teaches springs that are not connected directly to the stabilization device at their ends, but instead are free springs disposed between two surfaces.
Colleran et al. (U.S. patent number 2006/0036240), teaches a system and method for dynamic skeletal stabilization. Colleran teaches two screws that are each associated with a separate bracing portion. Colleran teaches a spring and two stops that allow the two bracing portions to move longitudinally with respect to one another. This provides some degree of movement between the two screws. In the Colleran design, one of the brace portions may also bend.
Rothman et al. (U.S. patent number 2006/0229612) teaches a method for vertebral stabilization using sleeved springs. Rothman teaches a spring that is disposed between two anchoring elements. Rothman further teaches sleeve elements that cover the ends of the springs. The sleeve elements include an inner surface configured to receive the springs and an outer surface configured to engage the anchoring elements. The sleeve elements include ends that serve as stops for the spring.
These methods and systems incorporating springs as dynamic components have several drawbacks. First, the methods and systems taught here lack well defined connection points for the springs, and instead rely on stops or sleeve assisted stops. Also, in these systems, the springs may not facilitate inward tension as the springs are stretched, nor facilitate outward tension that is associated with spring compression.
Methods of attaching rods to bone screws have been previously proposed. Tornier et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,662,651) teaches an external or internal fixator for repairing fractures of arthroplasties of the skeleton. Tornier teaches an implant screw that is connected to a support that is angularly indexed with respect to the screw. The support includes a cavity configured to receive a connecting rod. Tornier further teaches a locking screw that is fastened into place into the support member, thereby locking the connecting rod into place. The Tornier design has several drawbacks. The connecting rod is attached to a support that is separate from the screw, providing a potentially weakened connection between the connecting rod and the screw. Additionally, the locking screw does not include provisions to easily receive the surface of the connecting rod. Furthermore, Tornier does not teach a drive receiving surface used to install the screw.
There is a need in the art for a design that solves many of the problems of the prior art.
A dynamic stabilization device configured for the spine is disclosed. In one aspect, the invention provides a dynamic stabilization device configured for implantation into a spine, comprising: an outer spring and an inner spring, wherein the inner spring is disposed within the outer spring; and where the outer spring has a first working length that is equal to a second working length of the inner spring.
In another aspect, the inner spring is configured to attach to a first threaded portion of a first rod of the dynamic stabilization device.
In another aspect, the outer spring is configured to attach to a second threaded portion of a second rod of the stabilization device.
In another aspect, the first rod is attached to a first anchor configured for implantation into a first vertebra.
In another aspect, the second rod is attached to a second anchor configured for implantation into a second vertebra.
In another aspect, the invention provides a dynamic stabilization device configured for implantation into a spine, comprising: a dual spring member including a first end; a first rod including a first threaded portion; and where the first end of the dual spring member is configured to mechanically attach to the first threaded portion of the first rod.
In another aspect, a second end of the dual spring member is configured to attach to a second threaded portion associated with a second rod.
In another aspect, the dual spring member comprises an outer spring and an inner spring.
In another aspect, the outer spring is configured to connect to a first outer threaded portion of the first rod.
In another aspect, the inner spring is configured to connect to a first inner threaded portion of the first rod.
In another aspect, the inner spring and the outer spring are connected at the second end of the dual spring member.
In another aspect, the inner spring and the outer spring have approximately equal working lengths.
In another aspect, the inner spring and the outer spring are configured to experience stresses that are less than a fatigue limit associated with the inner spring and the outer spring.
In another aspect, the invention provides a dynamic stabilization device configured for implantation into a spine, comprising: a dual spring member including an outer spring and an inner spring, the dual spring member having a fatigue limit; and where the dynamic stabilization device is configured so that stresses applied to the dual spring member are always below an effective fatigue limit.
In another aspect, the fatigue limit is associated with a stress selected from a group consisting essentially of shear stresses, tensions stresses, compression stresses, torsional stresses, rotational stresses and any combination thereof.
In another aspect, the effective fatigue limit is between 10 percent of the fatigue limit and 75 percent of the fatigue limit.
In another aspect, the dual spring member has a life expectancy that is effectively indefinite.
In another aspect, the dual spring member is connected to a first outer threaded portion at a first end.
In another aspect, the dual spring member comprises an outer spring and an inner spring.
In another aspect, the outer spring has a first working length that is approximately equal to a second working length associated with the inner spring.
In another aspect, the inner spring comprises an inner coil and wherein the outer spring comprises an outer coil, and wherein the inner coil is different than the outer coil.
In another aspect, the inner spring has a first shape and wherein the outer spring has a second shape, and wherein the first shape is different than the second shape.
In another aspect, the invention provides a dynamic stabilization device configured for implantation into a spine, comprising: an anchor configured for implantation into a bone, including a proximal portion and a distal portion; the proximal portion including threading configured to penetrate a vertebra; the distal portion including a drive receiving surface; the distal portion including a first set of recesses configured to receive ridges associated with a rod; and where the first set of recesses is disposed within a drive receiving surface and wherein a cap configured to cover the distal portion includes a second set of recesses configured to receive the ridges.
In another aspect, the rod is associated with a dual spring member.
In another aspect, the dual spring member includes an inner spring and an outer spring;
In another aspect, the inner spring and the outer spring have approximately equal working lengths.
In another aspect, the dual spring member is configured to attach to a threaded portion of the rod.
In another aspect, the maximum stress applied to the dual spring member is below an effective fatigue limit that is less than half of a fatigue limit.
In another aspect, the inner spring and the outer spring are continuously formed at a first end of the dual spring member and at a second end of the dual spring member.
In another aspect, the inner spring and the outer spring are physically separated at a first end of the dual spring member and at a second end of the dual spring member.
In another aspect, the inner spring and the outer spring are continuously formed at a first end of the dual spring member and wherein the inner spring and the outer spring are physically separated at a second end of the dual spring member.
In another aspect, a surface of the rod is textured.
In another aspect, the ridges have a shape selected from the group consisting essentially of sinusoidal ridges, box-like ridges, triangular ridges, rounded ridges, and any combination thereof.
In another aspect, the dynamic stabilization device may be used to dynamically treat or correct various deformities.
In another aspect, the anchor is a screw.
In another aspect, the anchor is a hook.
In another aspect, the rod includes threading.
In another aspect, the rod includes a locking member configured to engage at least one spring.
In another aspect, the invention provides a dynamic stabilization system configured for implantation into a spine, comprising: a first dynamic stabilization device configured to be attached to adjacent vertebrae, the first dynamic stabilization device being pre-stressed and including a first residual stress; a second dynamic stabilization device configured to be attached to the adjacent vertebrae, the second dynamic stabilization device being pre-stressed and including a second residual stress; and wherein the first and second dynamic stabilization devices are configured to apply a force to the adjacent vertebrae thereby adjusting the relative positions of the adjacent vertebrae.
In another aspect, wherein the first residual stress is different than the second residual stress.
In another aspect, wherein the first residual stress is tension and the second residual stress is compression, and wherein a rotational force is applied to the adjacent vertebrae whereby scoliosis may be treated.
In another aspect, wherein the first residual stress is substantially equal to the second residual stress, and wherein a translational force is applied to the adjacent vertebrae whereby spondylolisthesis may be treated.
In another aspect, wherein the first residual stress is substantially equal to the second residual stress, and wherein a flexion force is applied to the adjacent vertebrae whereby spinal stenosis may be treated.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be, or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
In this embodiment, dynamic stabilization device 100 is configured to attach to first vertebra 102 and second vertebra 104. First vertebra 102 and second vertebra 104 are further associated with spinal disc 106. Spinal disc 106 is disposed between vertebrae 102 and 104. In some embodiments, spinal disc 106 could be surgically altered, including reduction in size. In other embodiments, spinal disc 106 may be a disc implant or disc replacement configured to provide support between vertebrae 102 and 104 following the removal of a spinal disc.
First anchor 202 and second anchor 204 preferably include threading 206 disposed on distal portion 207 of anchors 202 and 204. Preferably, threading 206 may have a major diameter that is sufficiently large compared to the minor diameter of threading 206. Furthermore, the pitch of threading 206 is preferably large enough to provide adequate holding strength. Using this preferred threading arrangement may provide increased strength of the connection between anchors 202 and 204 and vertebrae 102 and 104, respectively.
First anchor 202 preferably includes first drive receiving surface 210 disposed at proximal portion 209. Preferably, first drive receiving surface 210 is disposed circumferentially around first anchor 202. In other embodiments, the drive receiving surface is disposed within anchor head 214. In the preferred embodiment, first drive receiving surface 210 may be a hexagonal surface configured to receive a wrench or ratchet of some kind. First drive receiving surface 210 may include first flat side 212. Preferably, one or more additional flat sides (not shown) are adjacent to first flat side 212 on first drive receiving surface 210. Using this arrangement, a wrench, socket or other tool may be applied to first flat side 212 and one or more additional flat sides (not shown) to manipulate first anchor 202. In particular, with this arrangement, first anchor 202 may be drilled or otherwise screwed into place with respect to first vertebra 102.
In other embodiments, first drive receiving surface 210 may have a different shape. Furthermore, in some embodiments, additional provisions may be provided for driving first anchor 202 into place. In some embodiments, first anchor 202 may include a drive such as are found in the heads of various types of screws for receiving a screwdriver including, but not limited to: slotted drives, Phillips drives, Torx drives, Hex drives and Robertson drives.
First anchor 202 may also include first anchor head 214. Preferably, first anchor 202 is attached to first drive receiving surface 210. First anchor head 214 may include first slotted portion 216. Additionally, first anchor head 214 may include first anchor threading 218.
Preferably, first anchor 202 may be associated with first rod 220. In some embodiments, first anchor portion 202 may be configured to receive first rod 220 at first slotted portion 216 of first anchor head 214. Preferably, first slotted portion 216 is wide enough and deep enough to receive first rod 220. In an alternative embodiment, first slotted portion 216 and first rod 220 may be joined using an interference fit. In this case, first slotted portion 216 may be just large enough so that first rod 220 can be wedged into first slotted portion 216.
Furthermore, first anchor 202 may be associated with first cap 222. First cap 222 preferably includes first inner cap 224 and first outer cap 226. Preferably, first inner cap 224 is configured to fit within first outer cap 226. In some embodiments, first inner cap 224 may be formed integrally with first outer cap 226 resulting in a one piece or monolithic single cap. Furthermore, first inner cap 224 is preferably configured to receive first rod 220, while first outer cap 226 is configured to engage first anchor head 214. An assembled view of first cap 222, first rod 220 and first anchor 202 can be seen in
Preferably, second anchor 204 is substantially similar to first anchor 202. In particular, second anchor 204 may include second drive receiving surface 240, including second flat side 242. Furthermore, second anchor 204 may include second anchor head 244. Second anchor head 244 may be associated with second slotted portion 246 and second anchor threading 248.
Preferably, second anchor 204 may be associated with second rod 250. In some embodiments, second anchor 204 may be configured to receive second rod 250 at second slotted portion 246 of second anchor head 244. Preferably, second slotted portion 246 is wide enough and deep enough to receive second rod 250. In an alternative embodiment, second slotted portion 256 and second rod 250 may be joined using an interference fit. In this case, second slotted portion 256 may be just large enough so that second rod 250 can be wedged into second slotted portion 256.
Furthermore, second anchor 204 may be associated with second cap 252. Second cap 252 preferably includes second inner cap 254 and second outer cap 256. Preferably, second inner cap 254 is configured to fit within second outer cap 256. In some embodiments, second inner cap 254 may be formed integrally with second outer cap 256 resulting in a one piece or monolithic single cap. Furthermore, second inner cap 254 is preferably configured to receive second rod 250, while second outer cap 256 is configured to engage second anchor head 244. An assembled view of second cap 252, second rod 250 and second anchor 204 can be seen in
Preferably, dynamic stabilization device 100 is further associated with dual spring member 270. In some embodiments, dual spring member 270 comprises outer spring 272 and inner spring 274. Dual spring member 270 preferably includes first end 276 and second end 278. First end 276 may be configured to attach to first rod 220 and second end 278 may be configured to attach to second rod 250. As seen in
In an alternative embodiment, other types of anchors may be used with the dynamic stabilization device. In some cases, other types of fasteners known in the art other than bone screws may be used to attach the dynamic stabilization device to the adjacent vertebrae. In a preferred embodiment, one or more hooks may be used as anchors to minimize the trauma to the adjacent vertebrae during the fastening process. In other embodiments, plates attached to the vertebral body may be used as an alternative anchor.
In some embodiments, a dynamic stabilization device may include provisions for locking a dual spring member into place. In some cases, this may be accomplished by including locking members. In a preferred embodiment, the locking members may be configured to limit the motion of the ends of the dual spring member.
Referring to
Referring to
It should be understood that locking members could be used in other embodiments of a dynamic stabilization device. Although the current embodiment includes locking members used with hooks, in other embodiments, locking members could be used with any type of anchors for a dynamic stabilization device, including plates. Additionally, locking members may be used with any type rods or dual spring member.
Preferably, a dual spring member may include provisions for increased structural stability. In some embodiments, the dual spring member may comprise a single piece of material that is coiled into an outer spring and an inner spring. In other embodiments, the dual spring member may comprise two distinct springs.
It should be understood that inner spring 274 is shaded in
It should be understood that while outer spring 272 and inner spring 274 are joined in this embodiment, in other embodiments, springs 272 and 274 may comprise separate springs that are not directly connected. Additionally, in some embodiments, springs 272 and 274 may be joined at both ends of dual spring member 270.
Preferably, outer spring 272 and inner spring 274 share a common central axis 292. In other words, inner spring 274 is generally concentric with outer spring 272. In other embodiments, inner spring 274 could have a central axis that is slightly misaligned with outer spring 272. Varying the position of inner spring 274 with respect to outer spring 272 may facilitate changing the flexibility properties of springs 272 and 274 in the non-axial direction. In other words, modifying the orientation of springs 272 and 274 could allow for different bending properties of dual spring member 270. In some embodiments, springs 272 and 274 could be coiled in opposing directions. This alternative arrangement could help prevent inter-digitation of springs 272 and 274.
Generally, an inner spring and an outer spring may have any cross sectional shape. In particular, the cross sectional shape of the spring wire could be circular, triangular, rectangular as well as any other polygonal or irregular shape. Additionally, the cross sectional shape of the coil, which includes the windings of the spring wire, could have any shape, including circular, triangular, rectangular as well as any polygonal or irregular shape. It is also possible to provide inner and outer springs with different sized coils or wires. In other words, the wire diameters, shapes, configurations and sizes of the inner and outer springs may be different. By modifying the cross sectional shape and/or diameters of the spring wires and the spring coils comprising the inner and outer springs, various mechanical properties of a dual spring member can be modified.
In previous designs of spinal devices incorporating springs, the connection point of the springs could be a weak point. Often, in previous designs, springs may be attached to various rods or anchors using soldering techniques or other mechanical attachment techniques. In some cases, springs may simply be disposed against stops that prevent motion of the ends.
Preferably, a dual spring member includes provisions for securing a connection between the ends of the spring and the associated rods. In some embodiments, these connections may be made by incorporating threaded portions onto the rods that are configured to receive the ends of the dual spring member. In a preferred embodiment, these threaded portions may naturally conform to the free or natural state of the coils associated with the dual spring member.
Preferably, first threaded portion 502 is configured to form a strong mechanical connection with first end 276 of dual spring member 270. In this embodiment, first threaded portion 502 may have a diameter D1 that is approximately equivalent to the inner diameter D2 of inner spring 274 at first end 276. Preferably, diameter D1 is associated with the base diameter of first threaded portion 502. In other words, diameter D1 is the diameter of first threaded portion 502 when threading 506 is removed. Additionally, threading 506 of first threaded portion 502 may have a diameter of D3 that is approximately equivalent to the inner diameter D4 of outer spring 272 at first end 276. In some embodiments, the spacing L1 between threading 506 may also be approximately equal to the spacing L2 between adjacent coils on inner spring 274.
Using this preferred arrangement, inner spring 274 may be configured to wrap around first threaded portion 502, between threading 506, as seen in
Preferably, second rod 250 includes second threaded portion 522 configured to connect to second end 278 of dual spring member 270. This mechanical connection is preferably formed in a substantially similar manner to the connection between first threaded portion 502 and first end 276 of dual spring member 270.
In an alternative embodiment, a dual spring member could be used that incorporates two separate springs, as previously mentioned. Referring to
The method of connecting dual spring 700 proceeds in a similar manner to the connection formed in the previous embodiment. In this case, however, first rod 220 preferably includes outer threaded portion 710 as well as inner threaded portion 712. In this embodiment, outer threaded portion 710 is configured to receive outer spring 704 at first end 720 of dual spring member 700. Likewise, inner threaded portion 712 is preferably configured to receive inner spring 702 at first end 720 of dual spring member 700.
Preferably, outer threaded portion 710 has a diameter D5 that is roughly approximate to the inner diameter D6 of outer spring 704 at first end 720. Additionally, inner threaded portion 712 has a diameter D7 that is roughly approximate to the inner diameter D8 of inner spring 702 at first end 720. In both cases, the threaded portions are sized to suitably engage and capture their respective springs. Preferably, second rod 250 includes similar provisions for fastening to second end 722 of dual spring member 700. With this arrangement, first end 720 and second end 722 of dual spring member 700 may be securely fastened to rods 220 and 250, respectively, as seen in
In some embodiments, a dynamic stabilization device may include rods with threading. In the embodiment shown in
In a similar manner to the previous embodiments, outer threaded portions 462 and 472 may include grooves to receive outer spring 452. In some cases, hollow portions 464 and 474 may also include grooves to receive inner spring 454. Using a grooved arrangement allows springs 452 and 454 to be securely fastened with respect to rods 460 and 470. In other embodiments, hollow portions 464 and 474 may not include grooves to allow the ends of inner spring 454 to move freely. In other embodiments, outer portions 462 and 472 may not include grooves. Generally, in these embodiments, the outer spring 452 may be constrained with a cap. In these embodiments, the ends of inner spring 454 are preferably constrained within hollow portions 464 and 474.
Preferably, a dual spring member may include provisions for maintaining strength and resiliency for extended periods of time. This is necessary to ensure that stabilization to the spine is maintained over the lifetime of a patient who has a dynamic stabilization device implanted in their spine.
Preferably, the dual spring member includes provisions for preventing differential loading between the outer spring and the inner spring in order to prevent premature failure due to overloading of one spring. The term “differential loading” as used through this detailed description and in the claims refers to the tendency of one spring comprising a dual spring member to experience increased loads over a second spring. In other words, in some dual spring systems, one spring may carry a majority of the total load applied to both springs. Instead, it is preferable that a dual spring system include provisions for equally dividing the load between the two springs.
Referring back to
The working length for each spring may be approximated by multiplying the diameter of each spring times the number of turns associated with free portions of the spring. Since outer spring 272 has a diameter D4 that is larger than the diameter D2 associated with inner spring 274, to achieve an approximately equal working length, inner spring 274 should include a larger number of turns along second working portion 604.
Using this preferred configuration, dual spring member 270 may be configured to reduce differential loading associated with outer spring 272 and inner spring 274. This is an important feature for a dynamic stabilization device that may be used over an extended period of time since it prevents one spring from wearing out too quickly due to overloading. Furthermore, it should be understood that these same general principles for reducing differential loads apply to alternative embodiments that incorporate separate inner and outer springs.
Preferably, dynamic stabilization device 100 is preferably configured so that dual spring member 270 never experiences a stress greater than a predetermined fatigue limit. The term ‘fatigue limit’ refers to a maximum amount of stress that may be applied to a material to ensure that the material does not ever experience mechanical failure.
These various configurations of a dynamic fixation system may require a dual spring member to undergo constant bending as well as other types of stresses.
Curve 900 follows a general pattern for a class of materials containing iron, such as steel. In particular, this relationship includes fatigue limit 902 at approximately 300 MPa. Fatigue limit 902 represents a stress level below which dual spring member 270 may be indefinitely fatigued without failing. Therefore, as long as dual spring member 270 is designed so that during operation it does not undergo compression stresses at or above 300 MPa, dual spring member 270 may continue functioning indefinitely without undergoing failure.
Preferably, to allow for some variation in experimentally determined fatigue curves as well as to provide for some change in operating conditions, a dynamic stabilization device may be defined with an effective fatigue limit. An effective fatigue limit may be used to ensure safe use of a mechanical device by designing the device to operate at stress levels far below the fatigue limit. This built in safety factor allows for some error in designing the device without risking mechanical failure. In this preferred embodiment, effective fatigue limit 904 has a value of 150 MPa, which is less than 50% of fatigue limit 902. Therefore, using this preferred arrangement, dynamic stabilization device 100 may be designed so that dual spring member 270 never experiences stresses above effective fatigue limit 904 to ensure indefinite durability of dual spring member 270.
It should be understood that curve 900 is only intended to be exemplary. The values discussed here, especially the value 150 MPa for an effective fatigue limit associated with compressive and tension forces, are only intended to illustrate the concept of choosing an effective fatigue limit that is far less (around 50%) than the fatigue limit. Furthermore, although this embodiment illustrates an effective fatigue limit for the compression and tension of dual spring member 270, effective fatigue limits for tensile stresses and shear stresses are also preferably considered in constructing dynamic stabilization device 100. In other words, the stresses applied to dual spring member 270 as it is stretched and bent should also be below associated effective fatigue limits at all times to ensure that dual spring member 270 never undergoes failure.
Using this preferred arrangement, dynamic stabilization device 100 may be configured to function for an indefinite period of time by ensuring that dual spring member 270 never experiences stresses greater than effective fatigue limit 904. In other words, dynamic stabilization device 100 may be designed so that under normally expected physiological loads, dual spring member 270 will not be stressed beyond effective fatigue limit 904. This feature of durability when coupled with the provision to reduce differential loading preferably helps to maintain the structural integrity of dynamic stabilization device 100 indefinitely. This preferably allows dynamic stabilization device 100 to function for the lifetime of a patient, ensuring the stability of the spine over this period.
Preferably, a dynamic stabilization device includes provisions for securely fastening rods in place with respect to bone anchors as well as provisions for facilitating fine tuned adjustments to a spanning length between two anchors.
In this preferred embodiment, first recesses 1204 of first slotted portion 216 may be disposed within first drive receiving surface 210. In particular, first slotted portion 216 cuts through second flat side 1250 of first drive receiving surface 210. Similarly, first slotted portion 216 cuts through a flat side disposed opposite of second flat side 1250. This preferred arrangement allows for increased strength and durability of dynamic stabilization device 100, as first rod 220 may be fixed in place just above where first anchor 202 is driven into bone, thus reducing the moment arm and the forces experienced by dynamic stabilization device 100. In still other embodiments, first recessed 1204 and first slotted portion 216 may be disposed above first drive receiving surface 210. This arrangement may provide an increased moment arm, which can be used to correct deformities.
Once first rod 220 is inserted into first slotted portion 216, first cap 222 may be attached to first anchor head 214. In this embodiment, first inner cap 224 is disposed within first outer cap 226. First inner cap 224 includes second recesses 1206 configured to engage ridges 1202. Additionally, first outer cap 226 includes cap threading 1208 configured to screw onto first anchor threading 218. Therefore, as first cap 222 is screwed into place, first rod 220 is locked into place with respect to first anchor 202.
Although this embodiment includes the attachment of first rod 220 to first anchor 202, it should be understood that a similar procedure is used to attach second rod 250 to second anchor 204. Using the preferred configuration, first anchor 202 and second anchor 204 can be secured via rods 220 and 250, respectively, to dual spring member 270.
Preferably, this method of attachment allows a surgeon to fine tune the distance between first anchor 202 and second anchor 204, as the anchors 202 and 204 may be moved with respect to rods 220 and 250 in increments associated with the distance between ridges 1202. In some embodiments, the spacing between ridges 1202 may be made small so that very fine adjustments may be made. Furthermore, because of the nature of the connection, rods 220 and 250 will not slip with respect to anchors 202 and 204, thus preserving the initially selected length indefinitely.
In some embodiments, the shape of ridges associated with a rod may be modified. In some cases, the cross-sectional shape of the ridges could be sinusoidal, box-like, triangular, rounded or any pattern. In other cases, a rod may not include any ridges, but instead may be smooth. In still other embodiments, a rod may include various textures such as a knurling pattern. In these embodiments, components of the dynamic stabilization device that are configured to engage the rod may also include textured patterns to provide frictional connections between the confronting surfaces of the rod and the adjacent components. Additionally, a rod could include threading so that the distance between the rods can be moved by turning them, as was discussed in a previous embodiment.
Generally, dual spring member 270 will undergo various stresses following implantation into a spine. Initially, referring to
For example, to correct scoliosis, a stabilization system including two stabilization devices may be attached to two adjacent vertebrae. These two dynamic stabilization devices may include different residual stresses, one stabilization device including residual tension and the second stabilization device including residual compression. This arrangement can apply a rotational force to the adjacent vertebrae whereby scoliosis may be corrected or stabilized.
In another example, to correct spondylolisthesis, a stabilization system including two stabilization devices may be attached to two adjacent vertebrae. These two dynamic stabilization devices may include substantially similar residual stresses, both stabilization devices including residual tension. This arrangement can apply a translational force to the adjacent vertebrae whereby spondylolisthesis may be corrected or stabilized. This motion can be demonstrated by comparing
In another example, to correct spinal stenosis, a stabilization system including two stabilization devices may be attached to two adjacent vertebrae. These two dynamic stabilization devices may include substantially similar residual stresses, both stabilization devices including residual compression. This arrangement can apply a flexion force to the adjacent vertebrae whereby stenosis may be corrected or stabilized. This motion can be demonstrated by comparing
In a final example, to correct scoliosis, a stabilization system including two stabilization devices may be attached to two adjacent vertebrae. These two dynamic stabilization devices may include two different residual stresses, with a first stabilization device including a residual compression and a second stabilization device including a residual tension. This arrangement can apply both compression and tension forces to the adjacent vertebrae whereby scoliosis may be corrected or stabilized.
Referring to
In some embodiments, first stabilization device 2010 may be associated with first side 2006 of spine 2000. In this embodiment, first stabilization device 2010 has a first initial position 2020 that is associated with a free or unstressed state of first dual spring member 2011. Additionally, second stabilization device 2012 may be associated with second side 2008 of spine 2000. In this embodiment, second stabilization device 2012 has a second initial position 2022 that is associated with a free or unstressed state of second dual spring member 2013.
In some embodiments, stabilization devices 2010 and 2012 may be pre-stressed before being attached to vertebrae 2002 and 2004. In the current embodiment, first stabilization device 2010 may undergo a pre-tension that causes first stabilization device 2010 to stretch from first initial position 2020 to first stressed position 2030. At this point, first dual spring member 2011 has preferably expanded from first original length L1 to first modified length L2. Following this, first stabilization device 2010 may be attached to first vertebrae 2002 at first attachment point 2042 and to second vertebrae 2004 at second attachment point 2041.
In this embodiment, second stabilization device 2012 may undergo a pre-compression that squeezes second stabilization device 2012 from a second initial position 2022 to a second stressed position 2032. At this point, second dual spring member 2013 has preferably contracted from second original length L3 to second modified length L4. Following this, second stabilization device 2012 may be attached to first vertebrae 2002 at third attachment point 2044 and to second vertebrae 2004 at fourth attachment point 2043.
Referring to
Using these various provisions discussed throughout this detailed description preferably improves the performance of a dynamic stabilization device. In particular, the resistance to differential loading and the design to maintain stresses below a predefined effective fatigue limit may increase the lifetime of dynamic stabilization device 100.
The materials used to make a dynamic stabilization device may vary from one embodiment to another embodiment. Preferably, materials used to construct the various components are rigid and may be designed to endure the harsh environment of the human body. Materials used for anchors (including screws and hooks), rods and various other components are well known in the art. Preferably, the materials used to construct a dual spring member are also relatively flexible to provide for some deflection of the inner and outer springs.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, the description is intended to be exemplary, rather than limiting and it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents. Also, various modifications and changes may be made within the scope of the attached claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/840,731, filed on Aug. 17, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,080,038, issued Dec. 20, 2011, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
575451 | Yost | Jan 1897 | A |
3507069 | Borba, Sr. | Apr 1970 | A |
3511280 | Mercier | May 1970 | A |
3807394 | Attenborough | Apr 1974 | A |
3862751 | Schwaller | Jan 1975 | A |
4817927 | Martin | Apr 1989 | A |
4854304 | Zielke | Aug 1989 | A |
4988349 | Pennig | Jan 1991 | A |
5034011 | Howland | Jul 1991 | A |
5101213 | Harada et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5129388 | Vignaud et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5176679 | Lin | Jan 1993 | A |
5180393 | Commarmond | Jan 1993 | A |
5330473 | Howland | Jul 1994 | A |
5382248 | Jacobson et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5385583 | Cotrel | Jan 1995 | A |
5562663 | Wisnewski et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5662651 | Tornier et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672175 | Martin | Sep 1997 | A |
5704937 | Martin | Jan 1998 | A |
5713898 | Stucker et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716356 | Biedermann et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5733284 | Martin | Mar 1998 | A |
6077262 | Schlapfer et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6402750 | Atkinson et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6458132 | Choi | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6485492 | Halm et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6585738 | Mangione et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616668 | Altarac et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6966910 | Ritland | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6986771 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6989011 | Paul et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7029475 | Panjabi | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7329258 | Studer | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7699875 | Timm | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7722649 | Biedermann et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
20020095154 | Atkinson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116001 | Schafer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030109880 | Shirado et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030220643 | Ferree | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040049190 | Biedermann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040236327 | Paul et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040267260 | Mack et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060015100 | Panjabi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060036240 | Colleran et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060041259 | Paul et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064090 | Park | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060106381 | Ferree et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060142758 | Petit | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060142760 | McDonnell | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184171 | Biedermann et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060212033 | Rothman et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060229608 | Foster et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229612 | Rothman et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060229613 | Timm et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060247632 | Winslow et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060247637 | Colleran et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060282080 | Albert et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060293657 | Hartmann | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070016193 | Ritland | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070032123 | Timm et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043356 | Timm et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070049936 | Colleran et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070049937 | Matthis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055244 | Jackson | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055247 | Jahng | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070233086 | Harms et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20090105760 | Frey | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100211104 | Moumene et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2709245 | Mar 1995 | FR |
2717370 | Sep 1995 | FR |
2799949 | Apr 2001 | FR |
2382304 | May 2003 | GB |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion mailed Mar. 4, 2010 from PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/072114. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100228298 A1 | Sep 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11840731 | Aug 2007 | US |
Child | 12770082 | US |