The present invention relates generally to the therapeutic treatment of tissue and more particularly, to a method for treating muscle tension on a tubular anatomical structure of a patient.
a. Electroporation:
Biophysical phenomenon “electroporation” (EP) refers to the use of electric field pulses to induce microscopic aquatic pores—“electropores”—in the lipid cell membranes. Depending on the parameters of the electric pulses, electroporated cell can survive the pulsing or die. The cause of death of an electroporated cell is believed to be a chemical imbalance in the cell, resulted from the fluid communication with the extra cellular environment through the pores. The number and size of electropores depend on both, the amplitude of electric field pulse E and the pulse duration t. Electroporation is observed for pulse durations in the range from tens of microseconds to hundreds of milliseconds. For a given duration of a pulse and below a certain limit of the electric field amplitude, no pores are induced at all. This limit is different for different cells, particularly, for cells of different sizes. The smaller the size of a cell, the higher the electric field required to induce pores and thus the higher the limit is. Above the lower limit the number of pores and their effective diameter increases proportionally with both the amplitude E and duration t.
Until the upper limit of electroporation is achieved, the cells survive pulsing and restore their viability thereafter. Above the upper limit, the pore diameters and number become too large for a cell to survive. The irreversibly chemically imbalanced cell cannot repair itself by any spontaneous or biological process and dies. To kill a cell, a potential in the range of 2 to 4 V should be applied along the cell. The cell killing by electroporation is a probabilistic process, increasing the number of applied pulses leads to increased probability of cell killing, approximately equal to the increase in the total duration of the electric pulse.
The survivability of electroporated cells depends significantly on their temperature. At higher temperature cells are more vulnerable, the amplitude and duration of the electric pulses required for cell killing are lower. This experimental fact is explained by two underlying phenomena: at higher temperatures cells are less stable biochemically because of more intense metabolism, and, secondly, at elevated temperatures the strength of lipid membranes decreases, which facilitates creating larger pores or irreversible rupture. At lower temperatures (10 to 20 degrees C.) cells are more resistant to electroporation and can survive two to three times higher voltages than that at the body temperature.
b. The Prostate Gland and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia:
The prostate is a walnut-sized gland that forms part of the male reproductive system. The gland consists of several lobes, or regions, enclosed by a dense fibrous capsule. It is located between the bladder and the rectum and wraps around the urethra, the tube that carries urine out from the bladder through the penis. There are generally three glandular zones in a prostate gland: central, peripheral and transitional. The transitional zone is located right behind the place where the seminal vesicles are merging with urethra. This transitional zone tends to be predisposed to benign enlargement. The prostate gland is generally composed of smooth muscles and glandular epithelial tissue. The glandular epithelial tissue produces prostatic fluid. The smooth muscles contract during sexual climax and squeeze the prostatic fluid into the urethra as the sperm passes through the ejaculatory ducts and urethra. Prostatic fluid secreted by the prostate gland provides nutrition for ejaculated spermatozoids increasing their mobility and improves the spermatozoids chances for survival after ejaculation by making the environment in the vaginal canal less acidic.
The prostate reaches its normal size and weight (about 20 grams) soon after puberty. The size and weight of the prostate typically remain stable until the individual reaches his mid-forties. At this age, the prostate typically begins to enlarge through a process of excessive cell proliferation, called benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This overgrowth can occur in both smooth muscle and glandular epithelial tissues and has been attributed to a number of different causes, including hormones and growth factors as well as generally to the aging process.
Benign prostate hyperplasia can cause distressing urination symptoms. As the disease progresses the dense capsule surrounding the enlarging prostate prevents it from further expansion outward and forces the prostate to press against the urethra, partially obstructing the urine flow. The tension in the smooth muscles of the prostate also increases which causes further compression of the urethra and reduction of the urine flow. Some symptoms of BPH stem from the gradual loss of bladder function leading to an incomplete emptying of the bladder. The symptoms can include straining to urinate, a weak or intermittent stream, an increased frequency of urination, pain during urination, and incontinence—the involuntary loss of urine following an uncontrollable sense of urgency. These symptoms alone can negatively affect the quality of life of effected men. Left untreated, BPH can cause even more severe complications, such as urinary tract infection, acute urinary retention, and uremia.
Before age 40, only 10% of men have benign prostatic hyperplasia; but by age 80, about 80% have signs of this condition. Benign prostatic hyperplasia is the most common non-cancerous form of cell growth in men. About 14 million men in US have BPH, and about 375,000 new patients are diagnosed every year.
For many years, researchers have tried to find medications to shrink the prostate or at least stop its growth. Between 1992 and 1997, the FDA approved four drugs: finasteride, terazosin, tamsulosin, and doxazosin for treatment of BPH.
Finasteride (Proscar) inhibits production of hormone DHT. DHT is one of the hormones that have been found to be involved in prostate enlargement. Treatment with Finasteride has been shown to actually shrink the prostate in some men.
Terazosin (Hytrin), doxazosin (Cardura), and tamsulosin belong to the class of drugs known as alpha-blockers. Alpha-blockers act by relaxing the smooth muscle of the prostate and bladder to improve urine flow and reduce bladder outlet obstruction. In men with severe symptoms, though, these medications are not curative. They can delay but not prevent the eventual need for surgery.
Regardless of the efficacy of any drug treatment, the long term exposure to xenobiotic compounds may produce additional unwanted side effects that are not realized until years after treatment. Accordingly, a need exists for an apparatus and method for the treatment of BPH that does not require the introduction of xenobiotic compounds.
For men with the most severe symptoms, surgery is generally considered to be the best long-term solution. There are several surgical procedures that have been developed for relieving symptoms of BPH. However, all of them are very morbid, require a long hospital stay, generally require the use of general anesthesia, suffer from significant side effects, and have possible complications.
In recent years, a number of procedures have been introduced that are less invasive than surgery. One such procedure is the transurethral microwave thermal therapy described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,575,811. In transurethral microwave thermal therapy, a Foley-type catheter containing a microwave antenna is placed within the urethra. The microwave antenna positioned adjacent to the transitional zone of the prostate, where BPH is located, allows selective heating of the prostate. Maintaining the temperature above 45.degree. C. during about one hour session leads to necrosis of the tissues and subsequent reabsorption of necrotic tissue by the body.
Another recently developed non-invasive technique is transurethral needle ablation (TUNA). TUNA is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,241,702. TUNA uses low level radio frequency (RF) energy to heat the prostate. Using TUNA, two separate needles are inserted into prostate through the urethra. Several watts of RF energy is applied to each needle to cause thermal necrosis of the prostate cells around the needles. Application of this treatment to several sites of the prostate typically results in sufficient necrosis to relieve symptoms of the BPH.
While generally successful, the microwave and RF therapies are relatively long procedures. Also, because of the poor temperature control of the heated volume, the volume of removed tissue is often not sufficient for the long term relief of the symptoms and/or the healthy tissue of the urethra is damaged. A damaged urethra is capable of restoring itself, but the healing is a long morbid process accompanied by sloughing of the necrotic tissue into urethra and excreting it during urination.
Therefore, a need exists for a minimally invasive therapy for treatment of BPH that requires shorter treatment times and is less morbid than existing therapies.
The present invention satisfies the above-listed needs and provides additional improvements and advantages that will be recognized by those skilled in the art upon review of the following description and figures.
The object of the present invention is to provide a treatment that causes necrosis of BPH in a shorter period of time than that of the existing transurethral thermal therapies.
Another object of the present invention is to destroy nerves causing tension in the fibre-muscular tissue and thus achieve relaxation of the muscles contracting the urethra.
Another object of the present invention is to decrease morbidity of the treatment.
Another object of the present invention is to improve control of the volume in the prostate where necrosis occurs, avoid sloughing of the necrotic tissue through the urethra and decrease the damage to the urethra itself.
A shorter treatment time is achieved by applying to the tumorous tissue multiple high voltage pulses that cause necrosis of BPH by electroporation.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating cells in a living human body. In certain embodiments, the method includes the steps of advancing into a tubular anatomical structure a catheter having a first and second electrode, and applying, using at least one of the advanced electrodes, an electrical energy in an amount sufficient to destroy elongate cells.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating cells in a living human body including advancing into a tubular anatomical structure a catheter having a first and second electrode, applying, using at least one of the advanced electrodes, an electrical energy in an amount sufficient to destroy elongate cells, where the step of applying includes applying the electrical energy in a direction which is substantially radial to the tubular anatomical structure.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating elongate cells in a living human body, the method including advancing into a tubular anatomical structure a catheter having a first and second electrode, positioning the electrodes of the advanced catheter near a target area containing elongate cells, applying, using at least one of the positioned electrodes, an electrical energy in an amount sufficient to destroy the elongate cells in the target area, wherein the step of applying includes applying the electrical energy in a direction substantially along the length of the elongate cells.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a method for treating elongate cells in a living human body, the method including advancing into the tubular anatomical structure a catheter having a first and second electrode, positioning the electrodes of the advanced catheter near a target area containing elongate cells, applying, using at least one of the positioned first and second electrodes, an electrical energy in an amount sufficient to destroy the elongate cells in the target area, wherein the step of applying includes applying the electrical energy in a direction which is substantially radial to the tubular anatomical structure.
The present invention, as well as its various features and advantages, will become evident to those skilled in the art when the following description of the invention is read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings as briefly described below and the appended claims. Throughout the drawings, like numerals refer to similar or identical parts.
All figures are drawn for ease of explanation of the basic teachings of the present invention only; the extensions of the figures with respect to number, position, relationship and dimensions of the parts to form the preferred embodiment will be explained or will be evident to those skilled in the art after the following description has been read and understood. Further, the exact dimensions and dimensional proportions to conform to specific force, weight, strength, and similar requirements will likewise be evident to those skilled in the art after the following description has been read and understood.
Where used in various figures or on multiple occasions within the same figures, the same numerals generally designate the same or similar parts or features. Furthermore, when the terms “vertical,” “horizontal,” “top,” “bottom,” “right,” “left,” “forward,” “rear,” “first,” “second,” “inside,” “outside,” and similar terms are used, the terms should be understood to reference only the structure shown in the drawings as it would generally appear to a person viewing the drawings and utilized only to facilitate describing the illustrated embodiment.
In one aspect, the current invention in part stems from recognition of the fact that the effect of electroporation on tissue can be modulated by selecting a specific direction relatively to a cell for application of a pulsed electric field. For elongated cells similar to muscle fibers the length-to-width ratio can be as high as 20 to 30. For the nerve cells this ratio can be even higher. The vulnerability of cells to electroporation is different for different directions of the applied field. It depends on the size of a cell in the direction of the applied field. In other words, elongated cells can be killed with significantly lower electric field if the field is applied along the cells, if the field is applied across the cell the cell is capable of surviving much higher amplitudes of the electric field.
In the current invention relief of symptoms is achieved by electroporation treatment, which is used to create a necrotic zone in the BPH tissue around the urethra. Necessary control of the volume of the necrotic area, its shape and location relatively to the healthy tissues of the prostate and urethra can be provided by a system of electrodes generating electric field in the area of the benign enlargement of the prostate. Application of multiple electrical pulses with appropriate voltage and duration leads to necrosis of prostatic tissues around the urethra.
Anatomically, predominant direction of fibers in the fibro-muscular glandular tissue of BPH is radial to the urethra. In the present invention the preferred direction of applied electric field is also radial to the urethra, coinciding with the direction of fibers. Application of the electroporating pulses along the muscular fibers and nerves that anatomically follow them selectively kills both types of fibers. Thus two intermediate goals of the present therapy become achieved: first, a significant volume of necrotic BPH tissue around the urethra is created; second, the nerves causing elevation in tension of the muscle fibers are destroyed. Removal of the necrotic tissue by macrophages decreases the total volume of BPH and reduces pressure on the urethra. Destruction of the nerves results in relaxation of the prostate. Subsequently, both effects contribute to the improvement of the urethra and bladder functions after treatment.
To apply a pulsed electric field to the BPH region in the transition zone of the prostate, a set of electrodes is placed into the urethra (and the bladder) on the urethral catheter. In other embodiments of the invention, external electrodes are utilized or needle-type electrodes may be introduced into the volume of BPH tissue. The electrodes are electrically connected to a generator producing high voltage pulses, the amplitude and duration of which are selected to provide electric field in the prostatic tissue exceeding the upper electroporation limit for the fibro-muscular cells. Duration of pulses may be selected from the range of 10 microseconds to 500 milliseconds. The amplitude and number of pulses are preselected to cause necrosis of the BPH cells, mainly muscle cells and nerves.
Sphincters, located on the urethra anterior and posterior to the prostate gland, consist of smooth muscle cells wrapped circumferentially around the urethra. They control shutting down the flow of urine from the bladder and should be preserved during the treatment. Radial electric field applied to the prostate is transversal to the sphincter muscle fibers to which they are relatively resistant. However, to ensure that electroporation injury to the sphincters is avoided, the electrode in the urethra between the sphincters should not be positioned too close to them. For the same reason the amplitude of the electric field during treatment should be selected not to exceed the upper electroporation limit of the sphincter muscles in the transversal direction.
In another aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus and method for treatment of the prostate. The invention is generally described in the context of an apparatus and method for the treatment of BPH as a specific example for illustrative purposes only. Upon review of the following description and figures, those skilled in the art will understand that an apparatus in accordance with the present invention may be used for a wide variety of indications.
An apparatus for treatment of the prostate in accordance with the present invention is shown in
An implementation of the present invention having three electrodes is shown in
In
Another apparatus for implementing the method in accordance with the present invention employing a perineal needle template for placement of electrodes into BPH is depicted in the
An apparatus for treatment of BPH by electroporation employing a urethral probe—an applicator for placement of electrodes into the prostate via urethra, is shown in
Under endoscopic guidance the probe is introduced by a physician into the patients urethra with the distal end of the probe positioned inside the prostate. The needle of the probe is advanced into the BPH tissue surrounding the urethra and multiple HV pulses are applied. The end point of the electroporation therapy is a significant and stable drop in the electrical resistance of the treated volume. The resistance drop indicates profound electroporation damage to the fibro muscular cells, which later on leads to their necrosis. Overall treatment of one site takes about 10 pulses and several seconds to several tens of seconds in time depending on the repetition rate of the pulse generator.
Another implementation of the current invention is shown in the
The relative positioning of the urethral electrode and the needle electrodes in the prostate during treatment is illustrated by
The treatment procedure with a urethra—perineal applicator starts by placing the probe 701 into the urethra 706. Balloon 705 at the distal end of the probe 703 is inflated. Inflated balloon 705 anchors the probe relatively to the urethra and the bladder. Due to selection of the location of electrode 708 on the probe 701, it can be positioned in the urethra at the exact location of the transition zone in the middle of the BPH overgrowth. As the probe 701 is being placed in the urethra, the needles 727 in cartridge 720 stay inactive, hidden in the back position. After the probe 701 is placed and anchored, the scrotum 715 is pulled aside and gently secured at a side and up position to avoid injury by the needles 727 to be advanced. Then the needles 727 are advanced into the forward position. They pierce the perineum 700 and the prostate 729 and deliver the needle electrodes 729 into the treatment positions around the central urethral electrode 708. After placement of all electrodes, the electroporation treatment is performed. Multiple high voltage pulses are delivered to the electrodes to create a radial to the urethra electric field to cause cell death and necrosis of a significant volume of neoplastic tissue, resulting in a relief of BPH symptoms. As the HV pulses are delivered the electrical resistance of the tissue is monitored. The end of the therapy is marked by a significant and stable drop in the resistance of the treated volume of tissue.
Placement of electrodes in the vicinity of prostate using a urethra-perineal applicator does not require ultrasound or other imaging guidance. Precise placement of the needles is provided by high mechanical tolerances of the applicator and high rigidity of the urethral probe. Using the urethra-perineal applicator allows for a short treatment time because it provides treatment in only one position of the electrodes, and does not require repositioning electrodes and multiple manipulation of the applicator.
The urethra-perineal applicator can be used for delivery of electrical energy to the prostate not only in the form of high voltage pulses causing electroporation necrosis, but also in the form of RF energy causing thermal necrosis of BPH.
Different needle electrodes used in the electroporation treatment are shown in
In versions 9a and 9b the sharp tips are electrically separated from the HV electrodes. In version 9c the tip is made of an insulating material, like glass, dielectric crystal or ceramics. This feature of the design prevents electric breakdowns and sparking from the tip through the tissue during HV pulsing.
Although preferred embodiments of the invention have been described in some detail, it is understood that obvious variations can be made without departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/134,109, filed Dec. 19, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/820,955, filed Jun. 22, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,634,929, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/347,965, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,765,010, filed Feb. 6, 2006, which is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/217,749, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,994,706, filed Aug. 13, 2002, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/311,792, filed Aug. 13, 2001 and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/325,994, filed Oct. 1, 2001, all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1653819 | Ephraim et al. | Dec 1927 | A |
3730238 | Butler | May 1973 | A |
3746004 | Jankelson | Jul 1973 | A |
3871359 | Pacela | Mar 1975 | A |
4016886 | Doss et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4037341 | Odle et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4216860 | Heimann | Aug 1980 | A |
4226246 | Fragnet | Oct 1980 | A |
4262672 | Kief | Apr 1981 | A |
4267047 | Henne et al. | May 1981 | A |
4278092 | Borsanyi et al. | Jul 1981 | A |
4299217 | Sagae et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4311148 | Courtney et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
4336881 | Babb et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4344436 | Kubota | Aug 1982 | A |
4392855 | Oreopoulos et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4406827 | Carim | Sep 1983 | A |
4407943 | Cole et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4416276 | Newton et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4447235 | Clarke | May 1984 | A |
4469098 | Davi | Sep 1984 | A |
4489535 | Veltman | Dec 1984 | A |
4512765 | Muto | Apr 1985 | A |
4580572 | Granek et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4636199 | Victor | Jan 1987 | A |
4672969 | Dew | Jun 1987 | A |
4676258 | Inokuchi et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4676782 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4687471 | Twardowski et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4716896 | Ackerman | Jan 1988 | A |
4723549 | Wholey et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4756838 | Veltman | Jul 1988 | A |
4772269 | Twardowski et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4798585 | Inoue et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4810963 | Blake-Coleman et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4813929 | Semrad | Mar 1989 | A |
4819637 | Dormandy, Jr. et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4822470 | Chang | Apr 1989 | A |
4836204 | Landymore et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4840172 | Augustine et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4863426 | Ferragamo et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4885003 | Hillstead | Dec 1989 | A |
4886496 | Conoscenti et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4886502 | Poirier et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4889634 | El-Rashidy | Dec 1989 | A |
4907601 | Frick | Mar 1990 | A |
4919148 | Muccio | Apr 1990 | A |
4920978 | Colvin | May 1990 | A |
4921484 | Hillstead | May 1990 | A |
4946793 | Marshall, III | Aug 1990 | A |
4976709 | Sand | Dec 1990 | A |
4981477 | Schon et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4986810 | Semrad | Jan 1991 | A |
4987895 | Heimlich | Jan 1991 | A |
5019034 | Weaver et al. | May 1991 | A |
5031775 | Kane | Jul 1991 | A |
5052391 | Silberstone et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5053013 | Ensminger et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5058605 | Slovak | Oct 1991 | A |
5071558 | Itoh | Dec 1991 | A |
5098843 | Calvin | Mar 1992 | A |
5122137 | Lennox | Jun 1992 | A |
5134070 | Casnig | Jul 1992 | A |
5137517 | Loney et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5141499 | Zappacosta | Aug 1992 | A |
5156597 | Verreet et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5173158 | Schmukler | Dec 1992 | A |
5186715 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5186800 | Dower | Feb 1993 | A |
5188592 | Hakki | Feb 1993 | A |
5190541 | Abele et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5192312 | Orton | Mar 1993 | A |
5193537 | Freeman | Mar 1993 | A |
5209723 | Twardowski et al. | May 1993 | A |
5215530 | Hogan | Jun 1993 | A |
5222997 | Montgomery | Jun 1993 | A |
5224933 | Bromander | Jul 1993 | A |
5227730 | King et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5233515 | Cosman | Aug 1993 | A |
5242415 | Kantrowitz et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5273525 | Hofmann | Dec 1993 | A |
5277201 | Stern | Jan 1994 | A |
5279564 | Taylor | Jan 1994 | A |
5281213 | Milder et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5283194 | Schmukler | Feb 1994 | A |
5290263 | Wigness et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5308325 | Quinn et al. | May 1994 | A |
5308338 | Helfrich | May 1994 | A |
5318543 | Ross et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5318563 | Malis et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5328451 | Davis et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5334167 | Cocanower | Aug 1994 | A |
5383917 | Desai et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5389069 | Weaver | Feb 1995 | A |
5391158 | Peters | Feb 1995 | A |
5403311 | Abele et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5405320 | Twardowski et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5417687 | Nardella et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425752 | Vu'Nguyen | Jun 1995 | A |
5439440 | Hofmann | Aug 1995 | A |
5439444 | Andersen et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5458597 | Edwards et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458625 | Kendall | Oct 1995 | A |
5462521 | Brucker et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5484400 | Edwards et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5484401 | Rodriguez et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5533999 | Hood et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536240 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5536267 | Edwards et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5540737 | Fenn | Jul 1996 | A |
5546940 | Panescu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5562720 | Stern et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5575811 | Reid et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5582588 | Sakurai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586982 | Abela | Dec 1996 | A |
5588424 | Insler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588960 | Edwards et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5599294 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5599311 | Raulerson | Feb 1997 | A |
5616126 | Malekmehr et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5620479 | Diederich | Apr 1997 | A |
5626146 | Barber et al. | May 1997 | A |
5630426 | Eggers et al. | May 1997 | A |
5634899 | Shapland et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5643197 | Brucker et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5645855 | Lorenz | Jul 1997 | A |
5672173 | Gough et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5672174 | Gough et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5674267 | Mir et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5683384 | Gough et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5687723 | Avitall | Nov 1997 | A |
5690620 | Knott | Nov 1997 | A |
5697905 | d'Ambrosio | Dec 1997 | A |
5700252 | Klingenstein | Dec 1997 | A |
5702359 | Hofmann et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707332 | Weinberger | Jan 1998 | A |
5718246 | Vona | Feb 1998 | A |
5720921 | Meserol | Feb 1998 | A |
5728143 | Gough et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5735847 | Gough et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5752939 | Makoto | May 1998 | A |
5778894 | Dorogi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782827 | Gough et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782882 | Lerman et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5800378 | Edwards et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5800484 | Gough et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807272 | Kun et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807306 | Shapland et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5807395 | Mulier et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5810742 | Pearlman | Sep 1998 | A |
5810762 | Hofmann | Sep 1998 | A |
5810804 | Gough et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5830184 | Basta | Nov 1998 | A |
5836897 | Sakurai et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836905 | Lemelson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5843026 | Edwards et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5843182 | Goldstein | Dec 1998 | A |
5863290 | Gough et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5865787 | Shapland et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5866756 | Giros et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5868708 | Hart et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5873849 | Bernard | Feb 1999 | A |
5904648 | Arndt et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913855 | Gough et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5919142 | Boone et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5919191 | Lennox et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5921982 | Lesh et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944710 | Dev et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947284 | Foster | Sep 1999 | A |
5947889 | Hehrlein | Sep 1999 | A |
5954745 | Gertler et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957919 | Laufer | Sep 1999 | A |
5968006 | Hofmann | Oct 1999 | A |
5983131 | Weaver et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5984896 | Boyd | Nov 1999 | A |
5991697 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999847 | Elstrom | Dec 1999 | A |
6004339 | Wijay | Dec 1999 | A |
6009347 | Hofmann | Dec 1999 | A |
6009877 | Edwards | Jan 2000 | A |
6010613 | Walters et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6012885 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6016452 | Kasevich | Jan 2000 | A |
6029090 | Herbst | Feb 2000 | A |
6041252 | Walker et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6043066 | Mangano et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6050994 | Sherman | Apr 2000 | A |
6055453 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6059780 | Gough et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066134 | Eggers et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068121 | McGlinch | May 2000 | A |
6068650 | Hofmann et al. | May 2000 | A |
6071281 | Burnside et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6074374 | Fulton | Jun 2000 | A |
6074389 | Levine et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6083255 | Laufer | Jul 2000 | A |
6085115 | Weaver et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090016 | Kuo | Jul 2000 | A |
6090105 | Zepeda et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6090106 | Goble et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6102885 | Bass | Aug 2000 | A |
6106521 | Blewett et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6106524 | Eggers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6109270 | Mah et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110192 | Ravenscroft et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113593 | Tu et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6116330 | Salyer | Sep 2000 | A |
6122599 | Mehta | Sep 2000 | A |
6123701 | Nezhat | Sep 2000 | A |
6132397 | Davis et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6132419 | Hofmann | Oct 2000 | A |
6134460 | Chance | Oct 2000 | A |
6139545 | Utley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6150148 | Nanda et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6159163 | Strauss et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193715 | Wrublewski et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198970 | Freed et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200314 | Sherman | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208893 | Hofmann | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210402 | Olsen et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212433 | Behl | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216034 | Hofmann et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6219577 | Brown, III et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6233490 | Kasevich | May 2001 | B1 |
6235023 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241702 | Lundquist et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6241725 | Cosman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258087 | Edwards | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6258100 | Alferness et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6261831 | Agee | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6277114 | Bullivant et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278895 | Bernard | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280441 | Ryan | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283988 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6283989 | Laufer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6284140 | Sommermeyer et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287293 | Jones et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287304 | Eggers et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296636 | Cheng et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298726 | Adachi et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6299633 | Laufer | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6300108 | Rubinsky et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6326177 | Schoenbach et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6327505 | Medhkour et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328689 | Gonzalez et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328735 | Curley et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330478 | Lee et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6347247 | Dev et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349233 | Adams | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6351674 | Silverstone | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6387671 | Rubinsky et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6403348 | Rubinsky et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405732 | Edwards et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411852 | Danek et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6419674 | Bowser et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443952 | Mulier et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6463331 | Edwards | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470211 | Ideker et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6478793 | Cosman et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482221 | Hebert et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6482619 | Rubinsky et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6485487 | Sherman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6488673 | Laufer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6488678 | Sherman | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6488680 | Francischelli et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6491706 | Alferness et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493589 | Medhkour et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493592 | Leonard et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6497704 | Ein-Gal | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6500173 | Underwood et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6503248 | Levine | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6506189 | Rittman, III et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514248 | Eggers et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6520183 | Amar | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6526320 | Mitchell | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530922 | Cosman et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533784 | Truckai et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6537976 | Gupta | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6558378 | Sherman et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6562604 | Rubinsky et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6575967 | Leveen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6575969 | Rittman, III et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6589161 | Corcoran | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6589174 | Chopra et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6592594 | Rimbaugh et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6607529 | Jones et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6610054 | Edwards et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6611706 | Avrahami et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6613211 | McCormick et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6616657 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6627421 | Unger et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6634363 | Danek et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6638253 | Breznock | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6653091 | Dunn et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6666858 | Lafontaine | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6669691 | Taimisto | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6673070 | Edwards et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6678558 | Dimmer et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6682501 | Nelson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6689096 | Loubens et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6689127 | Gough et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692493 | McGovern et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6694979 | Deem et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2488251 | Aug 2012 | EP |
2593179 | May 2013 | EP |
2627274 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2651505 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2300272 | Jun 2008 | ES |
2315493 | Apr 2009 | ES |
2001510702 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2003505072 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2003506064 | Feb 2003 | JP |
2004203224 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2004525726 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004303590 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005501596 | Jan 2005 | JP |
2005526579 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2008508946 | Mar 2008 | JP |
2009518130 | May 2009 | JP |
2009518150 | May 2009 | JP |
2009518151 | May 2009 | JP |
2009532077 | Sep 2009 | JP |
2010511467 | Apr 2010 | JP |
2012510332 | May 2012 | JP |
4252316 | Sep 2012 | JP |
2012521863 | Sep 2012 | JP |
101034682 | Sep 2012 | KR |
WO9104014 | Apr 1991 | WO |
WO9634571 | Nov 1996 | WO |
WO9639531 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO9810745 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO9814238 | Apr 1998 | WO |
WO9901076 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO9904710 | Feb 1999 | WO |
WO0020554 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO0107583 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0107584 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0107585 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0110319 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0148153 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO0170114 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO0181533 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO0200554 | Jan 2002 | WO |
WO02078527 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO02089686 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO02100459 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO03020144 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO03047684 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO03099382 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO2004037341 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2004080347 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2005065284 | May 2004 | WO |
WO2006017666 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO2006130194 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO2007067628 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007067937 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007067938 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007067939 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007067940 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007067941 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007067943 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007070361 | Jun 2007 | WO |
WO2007123690 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2007137303 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO2008063195 | May 2008 | WO |
WO2008101086 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2008101091 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO2009036468 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO2009046176 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO2009134876 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2009135070 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2009137800 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO2010064154 | Jun 2010 | WO |
WO2010085765 | Jul 2010 | WO |
WO2010117806 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO2010118387 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO2010128373 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2010132472 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO2010151277 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO2011028937 | Mar 2011 | WO |
WO2011047387 | Apr 2011 | WO |
WO2011062653 | May 2011 | WO |
WO2011072221 | Jun 2011 | WO |
WO2011135294 | Nov 2011 | WO |
WO2012006533 | Jan 2012 | WO |
WO2012051433 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012054560 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012054573 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO2012063266 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012071526 | May 2012 | WO |
WO2012088149 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Coates, et al, The electric discharge of the electric eel, Electrophorus electricus (Linnaeus), Zoologica: New York Zoological Society, pp. 1-32. |
Lynn, et al, A new method for the generation and use of focused ultrasound in experimental biology, pp. 179-193. |
Clark, et al, The Electrical Properties of Resting and Secreting Pancreas, pp. 247-260. |
Neumann, Rosenheck, Permeability changes induced by electric impulses in vesicular membranes, J. Membrane Biol., 1972, 10, pp. 279-290. |
Crowley, Electrical breakdown of bimolecular lipid membranes as an electromechanical instability, Biophysical Journal, 1973, vol. 13, 711-724. |
Zimmermann, et al, Dielectric breakdown of cell membranes, Biophysical Journal, 1974, vol. 14, pp. 881-899. |
Organ, Electrophysiologic principles of radiofrequency lesion making, Appl. Neurophysiol., 1976, 39, pp. 69-76. |
Kinosita, Jr., Tsong, Hemodialysis of human erythrocytes by a transient electric field, Biochemistry, 1977, vol. 74, No. 5, pp. 1923-1927. |
Kinsoita, Jr., Tsong, Formation and resealing of pores of controlled sizes in human erythrocyte membrane, Aug. 1977, vol. 268, pp. 438-441. |
Kinosita, Jr., Tsong, Voltage-induced pore formation and hemolysis of human erythrocytes, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1977, pp. 227-242. |
Baker, Knight, Calcium-dependent exocytosis in bovine adrenal medullary cells with leaky plasma membranes, Nature, Dec. 1978, vol. 276, pp. 620-622. |
Gauger, Bentrup, A study of dielectric membrane breakdown in the Fucus egg, J. Membrane Biol., 1979, 48, pp. 249-264. |
Erez, Shitzer, Controlled destruction and temperature distributions in biological tissues subjected to monactive electrocoagulation, Transactions of theASME, Feb. 1980, vol. 102, pp. 42-49. |
Neumann, et al, Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields, The EMBO Journal, 1982, vol. 1, No. 7, pp. 841-845. |
Seibert, et al, Clonal variation of MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vitro and in athymic nude mice, Cancer Research, May 1983, 43, pp. 2223-2239. |
Brown, Phototherapy of tumors, World J. Surg., 1983, 7, 700-709. |
Onik, et al, Ultraonic characteristics of frozen liver, Cryobiology, 1984, 21, pp. 321-328. |
Gilbert, et al, The use of ultrsound imaging for monitoring cryosurgery, IEEE Frontiers of Engineering and computing in Health Care, 1984, pp. 107-111. |
Onik, et al, Sonographic monitoring of hepatic cryosurgery in an experimental animal model, AJR, May 1985, 144, pp. 1043-1047. |
Griffiths, The importance of phase measurement in e lectrical impedance tomography, Phys. Med. Biol., Nov. 1987, vol. 32, No. 11, pp. 1435-1444. |
Okino, Mohri, Effects of high-voltage electrical impulse and an anticancer drug on in vivo growing tumors, Jpn. J. Cancer Res., Dec. 1987, 78, pp. 1319-1321. |
Kinosita, Jr. et al, Electroporation of cell membrane visualized under a pulsed-laser fluorescence microscope, Biophys. J., Jun. 1988, vol. 53, pp. 1015-1019. |
Amasha, et al, Quantitative assessment of impedance tomography for temperature measurements in microwave hyperthermia, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1988, vol. 9, Suppl. A, pp. 49-53. |
Asmai, et al, Dielectric properties of mouse lymphocytes and erythrocytes, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1989, 1010, pp. 49-55. |
Griffiths, Zhang, A dual-frequency electrical impedance tomography system, Phys. Med. Biol., 1989, vol. 34, No. 10, pp. 1465-1476. |
Rowland, et al, Transvenous ablation of atrioventricular conduction with a low energy power source, Br Heart J, 1989, 62, pp. 361-366. |
Marsazalek, et al, Schwan equation and transmembrane potential induced by alternating electric field, Biophysical Journal, Oct. 1990, vol. 58, pp. 1053-1058. |
Tekle, et al, Electroporation by using bipolar oscillating electric field: An improved method for DNA transfection of NIH 3T3 cells, Biochemistry, May 1991, vol. 88, pp. 4230-4234. |
Mir, et al, Electrochemotherapy potentiation of antitumour effect of bleomycin by local electric pulses, Eur. J. Cancer, 1991, vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 68-72. |
Mir, et al, Electrochemotherapy, a novel antitumor treatment: first clinical trial, Cancerology, 1991, 313, pp. 613-618. |
Narayan, Dahiya, Establishment and characterization of a human primay prostatic adenocarcinoma cell line (ND-1_, The Journal of Urology, Nov. 1992, vol. 148, pp. 1600-1604. |
Griffiths, et al, Measurement of pharyngeal transit time by electrical impedance tomography, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1993, vol. 13, Suppl. A, pp. 197-200. |
Rols, et al, Highly efficient transfection of mammalian cells by electric field pulses application to large volumes of cell culture by using a flow system, Eur. J. Biochem., 1992, 205, pp. 115-121. |
Brown, et al, Blood flow imaging using electrical impedance tomography, Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas., 1992, vol. 13, Suppl. A, pp. 175-179. |
Foster, et al, Production of prostatic lesions in canines usign transrectally administered high-intensity focused ultrasound, Eur Urol, 1993, pp. 330-336. |
Shiina, et al, Percutaneous ethanol injection therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: Results in 146 patients, AJR, May 1993, 160, pp. 1023-1028. |
Salford, et al, A new brain tumour therapy combining bleomycin with in vivo electropermeabilization, Biochemical and Biohysical Research Communications, Jul. 30, 1993, vol. 194, No. pp. 938-943. |
Glidewell, NG, The use of magnetic resonance imaging data and the inclusion of anisotropic regions in electrical impedance tomography, ISA, 1993, pp. 251-257. |
Gascoyne, et al, Membrane changes accompanying the induced differentiation of Friend murine erythroleukemia cells studied by dielectrophoresis, Biochimca et Biophysica Acta, 1993, 1149, pp. 119-126. |
Foster, et al, High-intensity focused ultrsound in the treatment of prostatic disease, Eur Urol, 1993, 23(suppl1), pp. 29-33. |
Andreason, Electroporation as a technique for the ransfer of macromolecules into mamalian cell lines, J. Tiss. Cult. Meth., 1993, 15, pp. 56-62. |
Weaver, Electroporation: A general phenomenon for manipulating cells and tissues, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 1993, 51, pp. 426-435. |
Barber, Electrical impedance tomography applied potential tomography, Advances in Biomedical Engineering, 1993, IOS Press, pp. 165-173. |
Cook, et al, ACT3: a high-speed, high-precision electrical impedance tomograph, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 1994, vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 713-722. |
Alberts, et al, Molecular biology of the Cell, Biocchemical education, 1994, 22(3), pp. 164. |
Hughes, et al, An analysis of studies comparing electrical impedance tomography with x-ray videofluoroscopy in the assessment of swallowing, Physiol. Meas. 1994, 15, pp. A199-A209. |
Griffiths, Tissue spectroscopy with electrical impedance tomography: Computer simulations, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Saep 1995, vol. 42, No. 9, pp. 948-954. |
Gencer, et al, Electrical impedance tomography: Induced-currentimaging achieved with a multiple coil system, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 1996, vol. 43, No. 2, pp. 139-149. |
Weaver, Chizmadzhev, Review Theory of electroporation: a review, Biolectrochemistry and Bioenergetics, 1996, 41, pp. 135-160. |
Gimsa, et al, Dielectric spectroscopy of single human erythrocytes at physiological ionic strength: Dispersion of the cytoplasm, Biophysical Journal, Jul. 1996, vol. 71, pp. 495-506. |
Sabuncu, et al, Dielectrophoretic separation of mouse melanoma clones, Biomicrofluidics, Jun. 16, 2010, 4, 021101, pp. 1-7. |
Garcia, et al, Intracranial nonthermal irreversible electroporation: In vivo analysis, J Membrane Biol, Jul. 29, 2010, 236, pp. 127-136. |
Neal, et al, Treatment of breast cancer through the application of irreversible electroporation using a novel minimally invasive single needle electrode, Breat Cancer Res Treat, Aug. 27, 2010, 123, 1, pp. 295-301. |
Zhang, et al, MR imaging to assess immediate response to irreversible electroporation for targeted ablation of liver tissues: Preclinical feasibility studies in a rodent model, Radiology, Aug. 2010, vol. 256, No. 2, pp. 424-432. |
Neal, et al, A study using irreversible electroporation to treat large, irregular tumors in a canine patient, 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, IEEE, Aug. 2010, pp. 2747-2750. |
Garcia, et al, Non-thermal irreversible electroporation for deep intracranial disorders, 32nd Annual International Conferenece of the IEEE EMBS, IEEE, Aug. 2010, pp. 2747463. |
Phillips, et al, Nonthermal irreversible electroporation for tissue decellularization, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, Aug. 16, 2010, vol. 132, 091003, pp. 1-8. |
Pech, et al, Irreversible electroporation of renal cell carcinoma: A first-in-man phase I clinical study, Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, Aug. 15, 2010. |
Lee, et al, Irreversible electroporation: A novel image-guided cancer therapy, Gut and Liver, Sep. 2010, vol. 4, Supp. 1, pp. S99-S104. |
Hong, et al, Cardiac ablation via electroporation, 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, IEEE, Sep. 2, 2010, pp. 3381-3384. |
Dupuy, et al, Irreversible electroporation in a swine lung model, Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, Dec. 30, 2010, 34, pp. 391-395. |
Arena, et al, Theoretical considerations of tissue electropration with high frequency biopolar pulses, IEEEE, pp. 1-7. |
Deodhar, et al, Renal tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation: Preliminary results in a porcine model, Technology and Engineering, Urology, 2010, 1-7. |
McCarley, Soulen, Percutaneous ablation of hepatic tumors, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2010, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 255-260. |
Neu, Neu, Mechanism of irreversible electroporation in cells: Insight from the models, Irreversible Electroporation: Biomed, pp. 85-122. |
Charpentier, et al, Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas in swine: A pilot study, HPB, 2010, 12, pp. 348-351. |
Tracy, et al, Irreversible electroporation (IRE): A novel method for renal tissue ablation, BJU International, 107, pp. 1982-1987. |
Onik, Rubinsky, Irreversible electroporation: First patient experience focal therapy of prostate cancer, Irreversible Electroporation, Biomed, pp. 235-247. |
McWilliams, et al, Image-guided tumor ablation: Emerging technologies and future directions, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2010, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 302-313. |
Kurup, Callstrom, Image-guided percutaneous ablation of bone and soft tissue tumors, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2010, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 276-284. |
Thomson, Human experience with irreversible electroporation, Irreversible Electroporation, Biomed, 2010, pp. 249-354. |
Saldanha, et al, Current tumor ablation technologies: Basic science and device review, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2010, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 247-254. |
Dupuy, Shulman, Current status of thermal ablation treatments for lung malignancies, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2010, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 268-275. |
Carmi, Georgiades, Combination percutaneous and intraarterial therapy for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: A review, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2010, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 296-301. |
Jarm, et al, Antivascular effects of electrochemotherapy: implicatoins in treatment of bleeding metastases, Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther., 2010, 10, 5, pp. 729-746. |
Maybody, An overview of image-guided percutaneous ablation of renal tumors, Seminars in Interventional Radiology, 2010, vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 261-267. |
Goldberg, Rubinsky, A statistical model for multidimensional irreversible electroporation cell death in tissue, Biomedical Engineering Online, 2010, 9:13, pp. 1-13. |
Sano, et al, Towards the creation of decellularized organ constructs using irreversible electroporation and active mechanical perfusion, Biomedical Engineering Online, 2010, 9, 83, pp. 1-16. |
Mahmood, Gehl, Optimizing clinical performance and geometrical robustness of a new electrode device for intracranial tumor electroporation, Bioelectrochemistry, Jan. 6, 2011, 81, pp. 10-16. |
Garcia, et al, Non-thermal irreversible electroporation (N-TIRE) and adjuvant fractionated radiotherapeutic multimodal therapy for intracranial malignant glioma in a canine patient, Feb. 2011, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 73-83. |
Guo, et al, Irreversible electroporation in the liver: Contrast-enhanced inversion-recovery MR imaging approaches to differentiate reversibly electroporated penumbra from irreversibly electroporated ablation zones, Radiology, Feb. 2011, vol. 258, No. 2, pp. 461-468. |
Bower, et al, Irreversible electroporation of the pancreas: Definitive local therapy without systemic effects, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Feb. 28, 2011, 104, pp. 22-28. |
Ellis, et al, Nonthermal irreversible electroporation for intracranial surgical applications, J Neurosurg, Mar. 2011, 114, pp. 681-688. |
Nesin, et al, Manipulation of cell volume and membrane pore comparision following single cell permeabilization with 60- and 600-ns electric pulses, Biochim Biophys Acta, Mar. 2011, 1808(3), pp. 792-801. |
McCall, Nanoknife, liposomal doxorubicin show efficacy against liver cancer, European Congress of Radiology, Mar. 7, 2011, pp. 1-2. |
Mahmood, et al, Diffusion-weighted MRI for verification of electroporation-based treatments, J Membrane Biol, Mar. 6, 2011, 240, pp. 131-138. |
Deodhar, et al, Irreversible electroporation near the heart: Ventricular arrhythmias can be prevented with ECG synchronization, AJR, Mar. 2011, 196, pp. W330-W335. |
Garcia, et al, A parametric study delineating irreversible electroporation from thermal damage based on a minimally invasive intracranial procedure, Biomedical Engineering Online, 2011, 10: 34, pp. 1-21. |
Li, et al, The effects of irreversible electroporation (IRE) on nerves, PLoS One, Apr. 14, 2011, vol. 6, Iss. 4, e18831, pp. 1-7. |
Neal, et al, Successful treatment of a large soft tissue sarcoma with irreversible electroporaiton, Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 1, 2011, vol. 29, No. 13, pp. e372-e377. |
Thomson, et al, Investigation of the safety of irreversible electroporation in humans, J Vasc Intery Radiol, May 2011, 22, pp. 611-621. |
Rossmeisl, Jr., et al, Successful treatment of a large soft tissue sarcoma with irreversible electroporation, Journal of Clinical Oncology, May 1, 2011, vol. 29, No. 13, pp. e372-e377. |
Daniels, Rubinsky, Temperature modulation of electric fields in biological matter, PLoS One, vol. 6, Iss. 6, e20877, pp. 1-9. |
Lion, et al, Poly(I:C) enhances the susceptibility of leukemic cells to NK cell cytotoxicity and phagocytosis by DC, PLoS One, vol. 6, Iss. 6, e20952, pp. 1-10. |
Agerholm-Larsen, et al, Preclinical validation of electrochemotherapy as an effective treatment for brain tumors, Cancer Res, Jun. 1, 2011, 71, 11, pp. 3753-3762. |
Adeyanju, et al, The improvement of irreversible electroporation therapy using saline-irrigated electrodes: A theoretical study, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2011, vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 347-360. |
Mulhall, et al, Cancer, pre-cancer and normal oral cells distinguished by dielectrophoresis, Anal Bioanal chem, Aug. 30, 2011, 401, pp. 2455-2463. |
Troszak, Rubinsky, Self-powered electroporation using a singularity-induced nano-electroporation configuration, Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, Sep. 28, 2011, 414, pp. 419-424. |
Arena, et al, High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE) for non-thermal ablation without muscle contraction, BioMedical Engineering Online, Nov. 21, 2011, 10: 102, pp. 1-20. |
Hijouj, et al, Electroporationo-induced BBB disruption and tissue damage depicted by MRI, Neuro-Oncology, Abstracts from the 16th Annual Scientific Meeting, Nov. 17, 2011, vol. 13, Supp 3, ET-32, p. iii114. |
Szot, et al, 3D in vitro bioengineered tumors based on collagen I hydrogels, Biomaterials, Nov. 2011, 32(31), pp. 7905-7912. |
Bastista, et al, The use of whole organ decellularization for the generation of a vascularized liver organoid, Hepatology, 2011, vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 604-617. |
Sano, et al, Modeling and development fo a low frequency contactless dielectrophoresis (cDEP) platform to sort cancer cells from dilute whole blood samples, Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Charpentier, et al, Irreversible electroporation of the liver an dliver hilum in swine, HBP, 2011, 13, pp. 168-173. |
Sankaranarayanan, et al, Effect of irreversible electroporation on cell proliferation in fibroblasts, Proc. ESA Annual Meeting on Electrostatics, 2011, pp. 1-8. |
Sano, et al, Contactless dielectrophoretic spectroscopy: Examination of the dielectric properties of cells found in blood, Electrophoresis, 2011, 32, pp. 3164-3171. |
Chen, et al, Classification of cell types using a microfluidic device for mechanical and electrical measurements on single cells, Lab Chip, 2011, 11 , pp. 3174-3181. |
Rebersek, Miklavcic, Advantages and disadvantages of different concepts of electroporation pulse generation, Automatika, 2011, 52, 1, pp. 12-19. |
Ben-David, et al, Characterization of irreversible electroporaiton ablation in in vivo porcine liver, AJR, Jan. 2012, 198, pp. W62-W68. |
Appelbaum, et al, US findings after irreversible electroporation ablation: Radiologic-pathologic correlation, Radiology, Jan. 2012, vol. 262, No. 1, pp. 117-125. |
Salmanzadeh, et al, Dielectrophoretic differentiation of mouse ovarian surface epithelial cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts using contactless dielectrophoresis, Biomicrofluidics, Apr. 3, 2012, 6, 024104, pp. 1-13. |
Neal, et al, Experimental characterization and numerical modeling of tissue electrical conductivity during pulsed electric fields for irreversible electroporation treatment planning, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Apr. 2012, vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 1076-1085. |
Du Pre, et al, Minimal coronary artery damage by myocardial electroporation ablation, European Society of Cardiology, Europace, May 31, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
Wittkampf, et al, Myocradial lesion depth with circular electroporation ablation, Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 2012, 5, pp. 581-586. |
Arena, et al, Phase change electrodes for reducing joule heating during irreversible electroporation, Proceedings of the ASME 2012 Summer Bioengineering Conference, Jun. 20, 2012, pp. 1-2. |
Garcia, et al, Towards a predictive model of electroporation-based therapies using pre-pulse electrical measurements, 34th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Aug. 28, 2012, pp. 2575-2578. |
Hjouj, et al, MRI study on reversible and irreversible electroporation induced blood brain barrier disruption, Aug. 10, 2012, PLoS One, vol. 7, 8, e42817, pp. 1-9. |
Martin, et al, Irreversible electroporation therapy in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, American College of Surgeons, Sep. 2012, vol. 215, No. 3, pp. 361-369. |
Weaver, et al, A brief overview of electroporation pulse strength-duration space: A region where additional intracellular effects are expected, Bioelectrochemistry, Oct. 2012, 87, pp. 236-243. |
Arena, et al, A three-dimensional in vitro tumor platform for modeling therapeutic irreversible electroporation, Biophysical Journal, Nov. 2012, vol. 103, pp. 2033-2042. |
Garcia, et al, 7.0-T magnetic resonance imaging characterization of acute blood-brain-barrier disruption achieved with intracranial irreversible electroporation, PLoS One, vol. 7, 11, pp. 1-8. |
Arena, et al, Towards the development of latent heat storage electrodes for electroporation-based therapies, Applied Physics Letters, 2012, 101, 083902, pp. 1-4. |
Cannon, et al, Safety and early efficacy of irreversible electroporation for hepatic tumors in proximity to vital structures, Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
Bagla, Papadouris, Percutaneous irreversible electroporation of surgically unresectable pancreatic cancer: A case report, J Vasc Intery Radiol, 2012, 23, pp. 142-145. |
Phillips, et al, Irreversible electroporation on the small intestine, British Journal of Cancer, 2012, pp. 1-6. |
Mahnic-Kalamiza, et al, Educational application for visualization and analysis of electric field strength in multiple electrode electroporation, BMC Medical Education, 2012, 12, 102, pp. 1-13. |
Kingham, et al, Ablation of perivascular hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation, J Am Coll Surg, 2012, 215, pp. 379-387. |
Salmanzadeh, et al, Investigating dielectric properties of different stages of syngeneic murine ovarian cancer cells, Biomicrofluidics, Jan. 23, 2013, 7, 011809, pp. 1-12. |
Faroja, et al, Irreversible electroporation ablation: Is all the damage non-thermal?, Radiology, Feb. 2013, vol. 266, No. 2, pp. 462-470. |
Fong, et al, Modeling ewing sarcoma tumors in vitro with 3D scaffolds, PNAS, Apr. 16, 2013, vol. 110, No. 15, pp. 6500-6505. |
Garcia, et al, Position paper concerning the use of Angiodynamics' nanoknife system for treatment of brain gliomas, Virgina Tech—Wake Forest University, May 22, 2013, pp. 1-46. |
Salmanzadeh, et al, Sphingolipid metabolites modulate dielectric characteristics of cells in a mouse ovarian cancer progression model, Integr Biol, Jun. 2013, 5, 6, pp. 843-852. |
Polak, et al, On the electroporation thresholds of lipid bilayers: Molecular dynamics simulation investigations, J Membrane Biol, Jun. 13, 2013, 246, pp. 843-850. |
Jiang, et al, Membrane-targeting approaches for enhanced cancer cell destruction with irreversible electroporation, Annuals of Biomedical Engineering, Aug. 15, 2013. |
Bayazitoglu, et al, An overview of nanoparticle assisted laser therapy, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Sep. 11, 2013, 67, pp. 469-486. |
Rossmeisl, Jr., et al, Pathology of non-thermal irreversible electroporation (N-TIRE)-induced ablation of the canine brain, Journal of Veterinary Science, 2013, 14, 4, pp. 433-440. |
Lu, et al, Irreversible electroporation: Ready for prime time?, Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology, 2013, 16, pp. 277-286. |
Dunki-Jacobs, et al, Evaluation of resistance as a measure of successful tumor ablation during irreversible electroporation of the pancreas, American College of Surgeons, Feb. 2014, vol. 218, No. 2, pp. 179-187. |
Son, et al, Basic features of a cell electroporation model: illustrative behavior for tw overy different pulses, J Membrane Biol, Jul. 22, 2014, 247, pp. 1209-1228. |
Neal, et al, An “Off-the-Shelf” system for intraprocedural electrical current evaluation and monitoring of irreversible electroporation therapy, Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, Feb. 27, 2014. |
Sano, et al, In-vtro bipolar nano- and microsecond electro-pulse bursts for irreversible electroporation therapies, Bioelectrochemistry, Aug. 4, 2014, 100, pp. 69-79. |
Rossmeisl, New treatment modalities for brain tumors in dogs and cats, Vet Clin Small Anim, 2014, 44, pp. 1013-1038. |
Chen, et al, Preclinical study of locoregional therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma by bioelectric ablation with microsecond pulsed electric fields (usPEFs), Scientific Reports, Apr. 2015, 5, 9851, pp. 1-10. |
Trimmer, et al, Minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of small renal tumors with irreversible electroporation: a single-center experience, J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2015, 26: pp. 1465-1471. |
Eppich, et al, Pulsed electric fields for seletion of hematopoietic cells and depletion of tumor cell contaminants, Nature America, Aug. 2000, vol. 18, pp. 882-887. |
Mir, Therapeutic perspectives of in vivo cell electropermeabilization, Bioelectrochemistry, 2000, 53, pp. 1-10. |
Al-Khadra, et al, The role of electroporation in defibrillation, Circulation Research, Oct. 27, 2000, 87, pp. 797-804. |
Miklavcic, et al, A validated model of in vivo electric field distribution in tissues for electrochemotherapy and for DNA electrotransfer for gene therapy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 2000, 1523, pp. 73-83. |
Rubinsky, Cryosurgery, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 2, pp. 157-187. |
Jaroszeski, et al, In vivo gene delivery by electroporation, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1999, 35, pp. 131-137. |
Cowley, Lifestyle Good news for boomers, Newsweek, Dec. 30, 1996. |
Sharma, et al, Poloxamer 188 decrease susceptibility of artificial lipid membranes to electroporation, Biophysical Journal, 1996, vol. 71, pp. 3229-3241. |
Blad, Baldetorp, Impedance spectra of tumour tissue in comparison with normal tissue; a possible clinical application for electrical impedance tomography, Physiol. Meas., 1996, 17, pp. A105-A115. |
Ho, Mittal, Electroporation of cell membranes: a review, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 1996, 16(4), pp. 349-362. |
Gilbert, et al, Rapid report novel electrode designs for electrochemotherapy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Feb. 11, 1997, 1134, pp. 9-14. |
Zlotta, et al, Possible mechanisms fo action of transsurethral needle ablation of the prostate on benign prostatic hyperplasia systems: A neurohistochemical study, Journal of Urology, Mar. 1997, vol. 157, No. 3, pp. 894-899. |
Duraiswami et al, Solution of electrical impedance tomography equations using boundary element methods, Boundary Element Technology XII, Apr. 1997, pp. 227-237. |
Fox, Nicholls, Sampling conductivity images via MCMC, Auckland University, Auckland, New Zealand. |
Niaslund, Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate, Urology, Aug. 1997, vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 167-172. |
Boone, et al, Review imaging with electricity: Report of the European concerted action on impedance tomography, Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, Nov. 1997, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 201-232. |
Lurquin, Review: Gene transfer by electroporation, Molecular Biotechnology, 1997, vol. 7, pp. 5-31. |
Hapala, Breaking the barrier: methods for reversible permeabilization of cellular membranes, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 1997, 17(2), pp. 105-122. |
Duraiswami, et al, Boundary element techniques for efficient 2-D and 3-D electrical impedance tomography, Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, vol. 52, No. 13, pp. 2185-2196. |
Pinero, et al, Apoptotic and necrotic cell death are both induced by electroporation in HL60 human promyeloid leukaemia cells, Apoptosis, 1997, 2, pp. 330-336. |
Miklavcic, et al, The importance of electric field distribution for effective in vivo electroporation of tissues, Biophysical Journal, May 1998, vol. 74, pp. 2152-2158. |
Issa, et al, Recent Reports: The TUNA procedure for BPH: Review of the technology, Infections in Urology, Jul. 1998. |
Lundqvist, et al, Altering the biochemical state of individual cultured cells and organelles with ultramicroelectrodes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Sep. 1998, Vo. 95, pp. 10356-10360. |
Issa, et al, Specialty Surgery: The TUNA procedure for BPH: Basic procedure and clinical results, Infections in Urology, Sep. 1998. |
Dev, et al, Sustained local delivery of heparin to the rabbit arterial wall with an electroporation catheter, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1998, 45, pp. 337-345. |
Duraiswami, et al, Efficient 2D and3D electrical impedance tomography using dual reciprocity boundary element techniques, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 1998, 22, pp. 13-31. |
Mir, et al, Effective treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous malignant tumors by electrochemotherapy, 1998, British Journal of Cancer, 77 (12), pp. 2336-2342. |
Sersa, et al, Tumor blood flow modifying effect of electrochemotherapy with Bleomycin, Anticancer Research, 1999, 19, pp. 4017-4022. |
Thompson, et al, To determine whether the temperature of 2% lignocaine gel affects the initial discomfort which may be associated with its instillation into the male urethra, BJU International, 1999, 84, pp. 1035-1037. |
Gumerov, et al, The dipole approximation method and its coupling with the regular boundar yelement method for efficient electrical impedance tomography, BETECH 99. |
Yang, et al, Dielectric properties of human luekocyte subpopulations determined by electrorotation as a cell separation criterion, Jun. 1999, vol. 76, pp. 3307-3014. |
Huang, Rubinsky, Micro-electroporation: improving the efficiency and understanding of electrical permeabilization of cells, Biomedical Microdevices, 1999, 2:2, pp. 145-150. |
Mir, Orlowski, Mechanisms of electrochemotherapy, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1999, 35, pp. 107-118. |
Jaroszeski, et al, In vivo gene delivery by electroporationi, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1999, 35, pp. 131-137. |
Gehl, et al, In vivo electroporation of skeletal muscle: threshold, efficacy and relation to electric field distribution Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1999, 1428, pp. 233-240. |
Heller, et al, Clinical applications of electrochemotherapy, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 1999, 35, 119-129. |
Holder, et al, Low-Frequency System, Assessment and calibration of a low-frequency impedance tomography (EIT), optimized for use in imaging brain function in ambulant human subjects, Annals New York Academy Sciences, pp. 512-519. |
Dev, et al, Medical applications of electroporation, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Feb. 2000, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 206-222 |
Ivanusa, et al, MRI macromolecular contrast agents as indicators of changed tumor blood flow, Radiol Oncol, 2001, 35, 2, pp. 139-147. |
Ermolina, et al, Study of normal and malignant white blood cells by time domain dielectric spectroscopy, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Apr. 2001, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 253-261. |
Carson, et al, Improving patient satisfaction, BPH management strategies, Supplement to Urology Times, May 2001, Vo. 29, Suppl. 1, pp. 1-22. |
Beebe, et al, Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) effects on cells and tissues: Apoptosis induction and tumor growth inhibition, IEEE, 2002, pp. 211-215. |
N/A, When patient satisfaction is your goal, Precision Office TUNA System, VidaMed, Inc. |
Chandrasekar, et al, Transurethral needle ablation of the prostate (TUNA)—A prospective study, six year follow up, pp. 1210. |
N/A, Highlights from worldwide clinical studies, Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), Vidamed's Office TUNA System, VidaMed, Inc. , pp. 1-4. |
Schoenbach, et al, Intracellular effect of ultrashort electrical pulses, Bioelectromagnetics, 2001, 22, pp. 440-448. |
Cemazar, et al, Electroporation of human microvascular endothelial cells: evidence for an anti-vascular mechanism of electrochemotherapy, British Journal of Cancer, 2001, 84, 4, pp. 565-570. |
Kotnik, et al, Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical biopolar rectangular pulses, Part I. Increased efficiency of permeabilization, Bioelectrochemistry, 2001, 54, pp. 83-90. |
Kotnik, et al, Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical biopolar rectangular pulses, Part II. Reduced electrolytic contamination, Bioelectrochemistry, 2001, 54, pp. 91-95. |
Lebar, Miklavcic, Cell electropermeabilization to small molecules in vitro: control by pulse parameters, Radiol Oncol, 2001, 35, 3, pp. 193-202. |
Naslund, Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive treatments and transurethral resection (TURP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), Unveristy of Maryland School of Medicine, 2001, pp. 1213. |
Davalos, et al, A feasibility study for electrical impedance tomography as a means to montior tissue electroporatioin or molecular medicien, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Apr. 2002, vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 400-403. |
Jossinet, et al, Electrical impedance end-tomography: Imaging tissue from inside, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Jun. 2002, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 560-565. |
Lebar, et al, Inter-pulse interval between rectangular voltage pulses affects electroporation threshold of artifical lipid bilayers, IEEE Transactions on Nanobioscience, Sep. 2002, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 116-120. |
Sersa, et al, Reduced blood flow and oxygenation in SA-I tumors after electrochemotherapy with cisplatin, 2003, 87, pp. 1047-1054. |
Davalos, Real-time imaging for molecular medicine through electrical impedance tomography of electroporation, Dissertation, Univeristy of California, Berkeley. |
Rubinsky, Irreversible electroporation in medicine, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 255-259. |
Onik, et al, Irreversible electroporation: Implications for prostate ablation, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 295-300. |
Lee, et al, Imaging guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation: Ultrasound and immunohistological correlation, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 287-293. |
Bertacchini, et al, Design of an irreversible electroporation system for clinical use, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 313-320. |
Al-Sakere, et al, A study of the immunological response to tumor ablation with irreversible electroporation, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 301-305. |
Fischbach, et al, Engineering tumors with 3D scaffolds, Nature Methods, Sep. 2, 2007, vol. 4, No. 10, pp. 855-860. |
Ivorra, Rubinsky, In vivo electrical impedance measurements during and after electroporation of rat liver, Bioelectrochemistry, Oct. 21, 2007, 70, pp. 287-295. |
Yao, et al, Study of transmembrane potentials of inner and outer membranes induced by pulsed-electric-field model and simulation, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Oct. 2007, vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 1541-1549. |
Corovic, et al, Analytical and numerical quantification and comparison of the local electric field in the tissue for different electrode configurations, BioMedical Engineering Online, Oct. 15, 2007, 6, 37, pp. 1-14. |
Schoenbach, et al, Bioelectric effects of intense nanosecond pulses, IEEE Transactions on Dielectric and Electrical Insulation, 2007, vol. 14, Iss. 5, pp. 1088-1109. |
Al-Sakere, et al, Tumor ablation with irreversible electroporation, PLoS One, Nov. 7, 2007, Iss. 11, e1135, pp. 1-8. |
Hall, et al, Nanosecond pulsed electric fields have differential effects on cells in the S-phase, DNA and Cell Biology, 2007, vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 160-171. |
He, et al, Nonlinear current response of micro electroporation and resealing dynamics for human cancer cells, Bioelectrochemistry, Jan. 29, 2008, 72, pp. 161-168. |
Ott, et al, Perfusion-decellarized matrix: using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart, Nature Medicine, Jan. 13, 2008, vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 213-221. |
Ron, et al, Cell-based screening for membranal and cytoplasmatic markers using dielectric spectroscopy, Biophysical Chemistry, Mar. 29, 2008, 135, pp. 59-68. |
Garcia, et al, Irreversible electroporation (IRE) to treat brain tumors, Proceedings of the ASME 2008 Summer Bioengineering Conference (SBC2008), Jun. 25, 2008, pp. 6-7. |
Davalos, Rubinsky, Temperature considerations during irreversible electroporation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Jun. 14, 2008, 51, pp. 5617-5622. |
Dahl, et al, Nuclear shape, mechanics and mechanotransduction, Circulation Research, Jun. 6, 2008, 102, pp. 1307-1318. |
Seidler, et al, A Cre-loxP-based mouse model for conditional somatic gene expression and knockdown in vivo by using avian retroviral vectors, PNAS, Jul. 22, 2008, vol. 105, No. 29, pp. 10137-10142. |
Maor, et al, Intravascular irreversible electroporation: Theoretical and experimental feasibility study, 30th Annual International IEEE EMBS Conference, IEEE, Aug. 20, 2008, pp. 2051-2054. |
Maor, et al, Irreversible electroporation attenuates neointimal formation after angioplasty, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Sep. 2008, vol. 55, No. 9, pp. 2268-2274. |
Jensen, et al, Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper, BMC Medical Imaging, Oct. 16, 2008, 8, 16,m pp. 1-9. |
Rubinsky, et al, Optimal parameters for the destruction of prostate cancer using irreversible electroporation, The Journal of Urology, Dec. 2008, vol. 180, pp. 2668-2674. |
Daud, et al, Phase I trial of Interleukin-12 plasmid electroporation in patients with metastatic melanoma, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Dec. 20, 2008, vol. 26, No. 36, pp. 5896-5903. |
Flanagan, et al, Unique dielectric properties distinguish stem cells and their differentiated progency, Stem Cells, 2008, 26, pp. 656-665. |
Mali, et al, The effect of electroporation pulses on functioning of the heart, Med Biol Eng Comput, 2008. |
Kuthi, Gundersen, Nanosecond uplse generator with scalable pulse amplitude, IEEE, 2008, pp. 65-68. |
Craiu, Scadden, Chapter 22 flow electroporation with pulsed electric fields for purging tumor cells, Electroporation Protocols: Preclinical and Clinical Gene Medicine, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 423, pp. 301-310. |
Mir, Chapter 1 application of electroporation gene therapy: Past, current and future, Electroporation Protocols: Preclinical and Clinical Gene Medicine, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 423, pp. 3-17. |
Lin, Lee, An optically induced cell lysis device using dielectrophoresis, Applied Physics Letters, Jan. 20, 2009, 94, 033901, pp. 1-3. |
Kroeger, et al, Curvature-driven pore growth in charged membranes during charge-pulse and voltage-clamp experiments, Biophysical Journal, Feb. 2009, 96, 3, pp. 907-916. |
Maor, et al, Non thermal irreversible electroporation: Novel technology for vascular smooth muscle cells abation, PLoS One, Mar. 9, 2009, vol. 4757-, Iss. 3, e4757, pp. 1-9. |
Shafiee, et al, A preliminary study to delineate irreversible electroporation from thermal damage using the Arrhenius equation, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, Jul. 2009, vol. 131, 074509, pp. 1-5. |
Granot, et al, In vivo imaging of irreversible electroporation by means of electrical impedance tomography, Phys. Med. Biol., Jul. 30, 2009, 54, pp. 4927-4943. |
Daniels, Rubinsky, Electrical field and temperature model of nonthermal irreversible electroporation in heterogeneous tissues, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, Jul. 2009, vol. 131, 071006, pp. 1-12. |
Esser, et al, Towards solid tumor treatment by nanosecond pulsed electric fields, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2009, vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 289-306. |
Ivorra, et al, In vivo electrical conductivity measurements during and after tumor electroporation: conductivity changes reflect the treatment,Phys. Med. Biol., Sep. 17, 2009, 54, pp. 5949-5963. |
Garcia, et al, Pilot study of irreversible electroporation for intracranial surgery, 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, IEEE, Sep. 2, 2009, pp. 6513-6516. |
Hong, et al, Cardiac ablation via electroporation, 31st Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, IEEE, Sep. 2, 2009, pp. 3381-3384. |
Neal, Davalos, The feasibility of irreversible electroporation for the treatment of breast cancer and other heterogeneous systems, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Dec. 2009, vol. 37, No. 12, pp. 2615-2625. |
Sharma, et al, Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13, pp. 318-345. |
Ibey, et al, Selective cytotoxicity of intense nanosecond-duration electric pulses in mammalian cells, Biochim Biophys Acta, Nov. 2010, 1800, 11, pp. 1210-1219. |
Tsivian, Polascik, Recent advances in focal therapy of prostate and kidney cancer, Medicine Reports, Jan. 18, 2010, 2, 1, pp. 1-3. |
Maor, Rubinsky, Endovascular nonthermal irreversible electroporation: A finite element analysis, Journal of Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 7, 2010, vol. 132, 031008, pp. 1-7. |
Choi, et al, Preclinical analysis of irreversible electroporation on rat liver tissues using a microfabricated electroporator, Tissue Engineering Part C, 2010, vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 1245-1253. |
Verbridge, et al, Oxygen-controlled three-dimensional cultures to analyze tumor angiogenesis, Tissue Engineering, Part A, Apr. 9, 2010, vol. 16, No. 7, pp. 2133-2141. |
Lee, et al, Advanced hepatic ablation technique for creating complete cell death: Irreversible electroporation, 2010, Radiology, vol. 255, No. 2, pp. 426-433. |
Ball, et al, Irreversible electroporation: A new challenge in “out of the operating theater” anesthesia, Anesth Analg, May 2010, 110, pp. 1305-1309. |
Laufer, et al, Electrical impedance characterization of normal and cancerous human hepatic tissue, Physiol Meas, 2010, 31, pp. 995-1009. |
Mir, Orlowski, Introduction: Electropermeabilization as a new drug delivery approach, Methods in Molecular Medicine, 2000, vol. 37, pp. 99-117. |
O'Brien, et al, Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resarzurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity, Eur J Biochem, 2000, 267, pp. 5421-5426. |
Wright, On a relationship betweene the arrhenius parameters from thermal damage studies, Technical Brief, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, Apr. 2003, vol. 125, pp. 300-304. |
Heczynska, et al, Hypoxia promotes a dedifferentiated phenotype in ductal breast carcinoma in situ, Cancer Research, Apr. 1, 2003, 63, pp. 1441-1444. |
Ivorra, Bioimpedance monitoring for physicians: an overview, Biomedical Applications Group, Centre Nacional de Microelectronica, Jul. 2003, pp. 1-35. |
Weaver, Electroporation of biological membranes from multicellular to nano scales, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Oct. 2003, vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 754-768. |
Dev, et al, Electric field of a six-needle array electrode used in drug and DNA delivery in vivo: Analytical versus numerical solution, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Nov. 2003, vol. 50, No. 11, pp. 1296-1300. |
Rajagopal, Rockson, Coronary restenosis: A review of mechanisms and management, The American Journal of Medicine, Nov. 2003, vol. 115, pp. 547-553. |
Sersa, et al, Tumor blood flow modifying effects of electrochemotherapy: a potential vascular targeted mechanism, Radiol Oncol, 2003, 37, 1, pp. 43-48. |
Davalos, et al, Theoretical analysis of the thermal effects during in vivo tissue electroporation, Bioelectrochemistry, 2003, 61, pp. 99-107. |
Gothelf, et al, Electrochemotherapy: results of cancer treatment using enhanced delivery of bleomycin by electroporation, Cancer Treatment Reviews, 2003, 39, pp. 371-387. |
Bancroft, et al, Design of a flow perfusion bioreactor system for bone tissue-engineering applications, Tissue Engineering, 2003, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 549-554. |
Malpica, et al, Grading ovarian serous carcinoma using a two-tier system, Am J Surg Pathol, Apr. 2004, vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 496-504. |
Davalos, et al, Electrical impedance tomography for imaging tissue electroporation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, May 2004, vol. 51, No. 5, pp. 761-767. |
Albright, et al, Performance and complicatioins associated with the Synchromed 10-ml infusion pump for intrathecal baclofen administration in children, J Neurosurg (Pediatrics 2), Aug. 2004, vol. 101, pp. 64-68. |
Diederich, et al, Catheter-based ultrasound applicators for selective thermal ablation: progress towards MRI-guided applications in prostate, Int. J. Hyperthermia, Nov. 2004, vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 739-756. |
Radeva, et al, Induction of apoptosis and necrosis in cancer cells by electric fields, electromagnetic fields, and photodynamically active quinoids, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 2003, 23, pp. 185-200. |
Davalos, et al, Tissue ablation with irreversible electroporation, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Feb. 2005, vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 223-231. |
Sel, et al, Sequential finite element model of tissue electropermeabilization, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, May 2005, vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 816-827. |
Dean, Nonviral gene transfer to skeletal, smooth, and cardiac muscle in living animals, Am J Physiol cell Physiol, Aug. 2005, 289, pp. C233-C245. |
Pavselj, et al, The course of tissue permeabilization studied on a mathematical model of a subcutaenous tumor in small animals, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Aug. 2005, vol. 52, No. 8, pp. 1373-1381. |
Paszek, et al, Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype, Cancer Cell, Sep. 2005, vol. 8, pp. 241-254. |
Saur, et al, CXCR4 expression increases liver and lung metastasis in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer, Basic-Liver, pancreas, and biliary tract, Gastroenterology, Oct. 2004, 129, pp. 1237-1250. |
Knight, et al, Direct imaging of transvenous radiofrequency cardiac ablation using a steerable fiberoptic infrared endoscope, Heart Rhythm Society, Oct. 2005, vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 1116-1121. |
Miller, et al, Cancer cells ablation with irreversible electroporation, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Dec. 2005, vol. 4, No. 6, pp. 699-705. |
Mir, et al, Electric pulse-mediated gene delviery to various animal tissues, Advances in Genetics, 2005, vol. 54, pp. 84-114. |
Nikolski, Efimov, Electroporation of the heart, Europace, 2005, 7, pp. S146-S154. |
Machado-Aranda, et al, Gene transfer of the NA+, K+K -ATPase B1 subunit using electroporation increases lung liquid clearance, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2004, vol. 171, pp. 204-211. |
Kotnik, Miklavcic, Theoretical evaluation of voltage inducement on internal membranes of biological cells exposed to electric fields, Biophysical Journal, Jan. 2006, vol. 90, pp. 480-491. |
Labeed, et al, Differences in the biophysical properties of membrane and cytoplasm of apoptotic cells revealed using dielectrophoresis, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, Feb. 23, 2006, 1760, pp. 922-929. |
Pucihar, et al, Numerical determination of transmembrane voltage indcued on irregularly shaped cells, Annals of Biomedical Engineering, Mar. 18, 2006, vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 642-652. |
Gilbert, et al, Decellularization of tissues and organs, Biomaterials, Mar. 7, 2006, 27, pp. 3675-3683. |
Edd, et al, In vivo results of a new focal tissue ablation technique: Irreversible electroporation, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Jun. 2006, vol. 53, No. 5, pp. 1409-1415. |
Ivorra, Rubinsky, Impedance analyzer for in vivo electroporation studies, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS Annual International Conference, IEEE, Aug. 30, 2006, pp. 5056-5059. |
Carpenter, et al, CellProtiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes, Genome Biology, Oct. 31, 2006, vol. 7, Iss. 10, R100, pp. 1-11. |
Kanduser, et al, Cell membrane fluidity related to electroporation and resealing, Eur Biophys J, Oct. 8, 2006, 35, pp. 196-204. |
Bolland, et al, Development and characterisation of a full-thickness acellular porcine bladder matrix for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, Nov. 7, 2006, 28, pp. 1061-1070. |
Cukjati, et al, Real time electroporation control for accurate and safe in vivo non-viral gene therapy, Bioelectrochemistry, Nov. 10, 2006, 70, pp. 501-507. |
Tijink, et al, How we do it: Chemo-electroporation in the head and neck for otherwise untreatable patients, Correspondence, Clinical Otolaryngology, 2006, 31, pp. 447-451. |
Marty, et al, Electrochemotherapy—An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study, EJC Supplements, 2006, 4, pp. 3-13. |
Soden, et al, Successful application of targeted electrochemotherapy using novel flexible electrodes and low dose bleomycin to solid tumors, Cancer Letters, 2006, 232 pp. 300-310. |
Demirbas, Thermal energy storage and phase change materials: An overview, Energy Sources, Part B, 2006, 1, pp. 85-95. |
Rubinsky, et al, Irreversible electroporation: A new ablation modality—Clinical implications, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Feb. 2007, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-12. |
Zhou, et al, Electroporation-mediated transfer of plasmids to the lung results in reduced TLR9 signaling and Inflammation, Gene Therapy, Mar. 8, 2007, 14, pp. 775-780. |
Lavee, et al, A novel nonthermal energy source for surgical epicardial atrial ablation: Irreversible electroporation, The Heart Forum, Mar. 2007, 10, 2, pp. 96-101. |
Hall, et al, Nanosecond pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in p53-wildtype and p53-null HCT116 colon carcinoma cells, Apoptosis, May 23, 2007, 12, pp. 1721-1731. |
Sel, et al, Feasibility of employing model-based optimization of pulse amplitude and electrode distance for effective tumor electropereabilization, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, May 2007, vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 773-781. |
Kirson, et al, Alternating electric fields arrest cell proliferation in animal tumor models and human brain tumor, PNAS Jun. 12, 2007, vol. 104, No. 24, pp. 10152-10157. |
Talele, Gaynor, Non-linear time domain model of electropermeabilizationi: Response of a single cell to an arbitary applied electric field, Journal of Electrostatics, Jul. 16, 2007, 65, pp. 775-784. |
Esser, et al, Towards solid tumor treatment by irreversible electroporation: Intrinsic redistribution of fields and currents in tissue, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 261-273. |
Maor, et al, The effect of irreversible electroporation on blood vessels, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 307-312. |
Edd, Davalos, Mathematical modeling of irreversible electroporation for treatment planning, Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, Aug. 2007, vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 275-286. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170035501 A1 | Feb 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60325994 | Oct 2001 | US | |
60311792 | Aug 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10217749 | Aug 2002 | US |
Child | 11347965 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14590043 | Jan 2015 | US |
Child | 15296501 | US | |
Parent | 14134109 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 14590043 | US | |
Parent | 12820955 | Jun 2010 | US |
Child | 14134109 | US | |
Parent | 11347965 | Feb 2006 | US |
Child | 12820955 | US |