This invention pertains to methods of treating cardiac disease and cardiac rhythm management devices such as pacemakers and other implantable devices.
A myocardial infarction is the irreversible damage done to a segment of heart muscle by ischemia, where the myocardium is deprived of adequate oxygen and metabolite removal due to an interruption in blood supply. It is usually due to a sudden thrombotic occlusion of a coronary artery, commonly called a heart attack. If the coronary artery becomes completely occluded and there is poor collateral blood flow to the affected area, a transmural or full-wall thickness infarct can result in which much of the contractile function of the area is lost. Over a period of one to two months, the necrotic tissue heals, leaving a scar. The most extreme example of this is a ventricular aneurysm where all of the muscle fibers in the area are destroyed and replaced by fibrous scar tissue.
Even if the ventricular dysfunction as a result of the infarct is not immediately life-threatening, a common sequelae of a transmural myocardial infarction in the left ventricle is heart failure brought about by ventricular remodeling. Heart failure refers to a condition where cardiac output falls below a level adequate to meet the metabolic needs of the body which, if uncompensated, leads to rapid death. One physiological compensatory mechanism that acts to increase cardiac output is the increased diastolic filling pressure of the ventricles as an increased volume of blood is left in the lungs and venous system. This increases the preload, which is the degree to which the ventricles are stretched by the volume of blood in the ventricles at the end of diastole. An increase in preload causes an increase in stroke volume during systole, a phenomena known as the Frank-Starling principle.
Left ventricular remodeling is a physiological process in response to the hemodynamic effects of the infarct that causes changes in the shape and size of the left ventricle. Remodeling is initiated in response to a redistribution of cardiac stress and strain caused by the impairment of contractile function in the infarcted area as well as in nearby and/or interspersed viable myocardial tissue with lessened contractility due to the infarct. The remodeling process following a transmural infarction starts with an acute phase which lasts only for a few hours. The infarcted area at this stage includes tissue undergoing ischemic necrosis and is surrounded by normal myocardium. Over the next few days and months after scar tissue has formed, global remodeling and chamber enlargement occur in a third phase due to complex alterations in the architecture of the left ventricle involving both infarcted and non-infarcted areas. Remodeling is thought to be the result of a complex interplay of hemodynamic, neural, and hormonal factors.
As described above, the remodeling process begins immediately after a myocardial infarction. Until scar tissue forms, the infarcted area is particularly vulnerable to the distending forces within the ventricle and undergoes expansion over a period of hours to days as shown in a second phase of remodeling. Preventing or minimizing such post-infarct remodeling is the primary concern of the present invention.
The present invention relates to a method for treating myocardial infarction which includes minimizing the ventricular remodeling that normally occurs after such an event with pacing therapy. The part of the myocardium that is most vulnerable to the post-infarct remodeling process is the infarct region, which is an area that includes sites in and around the infarct where the myocardial fibers are still intact but contractile function is impaired. The infarct region is thus the area most likely to undergo the progressive non-compensatory dilation described above with wall thinning and further impairment of function. By pacing myocardial sites in proximity to the infarct with appropriately timed pacing pulses, the infarct region is pre-excited in a manner that lessens the mechanical stress to which it is subjected, thus reducing the stimulus for remodeling.
The degree to which a heart muscle fiber is stretched before it contracts is termed the preload, while the degree of tension or stress on a heart muscle fiber as it contracts is termed the afterload. The maximum tension and velocity of shortening of a muscle fiber increases with increasing preload, and the increase in contractile response of the heart with increasing preload is known as the Frank-Starling principle. When a myocardial region contracts late relative to other regions, the contraction of those other regions stretches the later contracting region and increases its preloading, thus causing an increase in the contractile force generated by the region. Conversely, a myocardial region that contracts earlier relative to other regions experiences decreased preloading and generates less contractile force. Because pressure within the ventricles rises rapidly from a diastolic to a systolic value as blood is pumped out into the aorta and pulmonary arteries, the parts of the ventricles that contract earlier during systole do so against a lower afterload than do parts of the ventricles contracting later. Thus, if a ventricular region can be made to contract earlier than parts of the ventricle, it will be subjected to both a decreased preload and afterload which decreases the mechanical stress experienced by the region relative to other regions during systolic contraction. The region will also do less work thus lessening its metabolic demands and the degree of any ischemia that may be present.
If the region around an infarct were made to contract during early systole, it would be subjected to less distending forces and less likely to undergo expansion, especially during the period immediately after a myocardial infarction. In order to cause early contraction and lessened stress, electrostimulatory pacing pulses may be delivered to one or more sites in or around the infarct in a manner that pre-excites those sites relative to the rest of the ventricle. (As the term is used herein, a pacing pulse is any electrical stimulation of the heart of sufficient energy to initiate a propagating depolarization, whether or not intended to enforce a particular heart rate.) In a normal heartbeat, the specialized His-Purkinje conduction network of the heart rapidly conducts excitatory impulses from the sino-atrial node to the atrio-ventricular node, and thence to the ventricular myocardium to result in a coordinated contraction of both ventricles. Artificial pacing with an electrode fixed into an area of the myocardium does not take advantage of the heart's normal specialized conduction system for conducting excitation throughout the ventricles because the specialized conduction system can only be entered by impulses emanating from the atrio-ventricular node. Thus the spread of excitation from a ventricular pacing site must proceed only via the much slower conducting ventricular muscle fibers, resulting in the part of the ventricular myocardium stimulated by the pacing electrode contracting well before parts of the ventricle located more distally to the electrode. This pre-excitation of a paced site relative to other sites can be used to deliberately change the distribution of wall stress experienced by the ventricle during the cardiac pumping cycle. Pre-excitation of the infarct region relative to other regions unloads the infarct region from mechanical stress by decreasing its afterload and preload, thus preventing or minimizing the remodeling that would otherwise occur. In addition, because the contractility of the infarct region is impaired, pre-excitation of the region results in a resynchronized ventricular contraction that is hemodynamically more effective. Decreasing the wall stress of the infarct region also lessens its oxygen requirements and lessens the probability of an arrhythmia arising in the region.
Pacing therapy to unload the infarct region may be implemented by pacing the ventricles at a single site in proximity to the infarct region or by pacing at multiple ventricular sites in such proximity. In the latter case, the pacing pulses may be delivered to the multiple sites simultaneously or in a defined pulse output sequence. As described below, the single-site or multiple site pacing may be performed in accordance with a bradycardia pacing algorithm such as an inhibited demand mode or a triggered mode.
1. Exemplary Implantable Device Description
A block diagram of an exemplary pacemaker for delivering pre-excitation pacing therapy to a site or sites in proximity to an infarct as described above is illustrated in
The device illustrated in
The controller controls the overall operation of the device in accordance with programmed instructions stored in memory. The controller interprets electrogram signals from the sensing channels and controls the delivery of paces in accordance with a pacing mode. The sensing circuitry of the pacemaker generates atrial and ventricular electrogram signals from the voltages sensed by the electrodes of a particular channel. When an electrogram signal in an atrial or sensing channel exceeds a specified threshold, the controller detects an atrial or ventricular sense, respectively, which pacing algorithms may employ to trigger or inhibit pacing.
In the case where the pre-excitation pacing of the ventricle is delivered at multiple sites, the sites may be paced simultaneously or in accordance with a particular pulse output sequence that specifies the order in which the sites are to be paced during a single beat. As aforesaid, one of the benefits of pre-excitation pacing of the infarct region may be resynchronization of the contraction that results in hemodynamic improvement. An alternative mechanism is that pacing unloads the peri-infarct and infarct region while minimally compromising hemodynamic function. In either case, the therapy may be more successful if multiple ventricular sites are paced in a specified sequence such that certain of the pacing sites are pre-excited earlier than others during a single beat. Pre-excitation pacing may involve biventricular pacing with the paces to right and left ventricles delivered either simultaneously or sequentially, with the interval between the paces termed the biventricular offset (BVO) interval (also sometimes referred to as the LV offset (LVO) interval or VV delay). The offset interval may be zero in order to pace both ventricles simultaneously, or non-zero in order to pace the left and right ventricles sequentially. As the term is used herein, a negative BVO refers to pacing the left ventricle before the right, while a positive BVO refers to pacing the right ventricle first.
Cardiac resynchronization or pre-excitation therapy is most conveniently delivered in conjunction with a bradycardia pacing mode. Bradycardia pacing modes refer to pacing algorithms used to pace the atria and/or ventricles in a manner that enforces a certain minimum heart rate. Because of the risk of inducing an arrhythmia with asynchronous pacing, most pacemakers for treating bradycardia are programmed to operate synchronously in a so-called demand mode where sensed cardiac events occurring within a defined interval either trigger or inhibit a pacing pulse. Inhibited demand pacing modes utilize escape intervals to control pacing in accordance with sensed intrinsic activity. In an inhibited demand mode, a pacing pulse is delivered to a heart chamber during a cardiac cycle only after expiration of a defined escape interval during which no intrinsic beat by the chamber is detected. For example, a ventricular escape interval for pacing the ventricles can be defined between ventricular events, referred to as the cardiac cycle (CC) interval with its inverse being the lower rate limit or LRL. The CC interval is restarted with each ventricular sense or pace. In atrial tracking and AV sequential pacing modes, another ventricular escape interval is defined between atrial and ventricular events, referred to as the AV delay (AVD) interval, where a ventricular pacing pulse is delivered upon expiration of the AV delay interval if no ventricular sense occurs before. In an atrial tracking mode, the atrio-ventricular pacing delay interval is triggered by an atrial sense and stopped by a ventricular sense or pace. An atrial escape interval can also be defined for pacing the atria either alone or in addition to pacing the ventricles. In an AV sequential pacing mode, the atrio-ventricular delay interval is triggered by an atrial pace and stopped by a ventricular sense or pace. Atrial tracking and AV sequential pacing are commonly combined so that an AVD interval starts with either an atrial pace or sense. As the term is used herein for biventricular pacing, the AVD interval refers to the interval between an atrial event (i.e., a pace or sense in one of the atria, usually the right atrium) and the first ventricular pace which pre-excites one of the ventricles, and the pacing instant for the non-pre-excited ventricle is specified by the BVO interval so that it is paced at an interval AVD+BVO after the atrial event. With either biventricular or left ventricle-only pacing, the AVD interval may be the same or different depending upon whether it is initiated by an atrial sense or pace (i.e., in atrial tracking and AV sequential pacing modes, respectively). A common way of implementing biventricular pacing or left ventricle-only pacing is to base the timing upon only right ventricular activity so that ventricular escape intervals are reset or stopped by right ventricular senses.
It was noted above that another benefit of pre-exciting ventricular tissue during systole is a reduction in its oxygen requirements, thus preventing or alleviating ischemia in the infarct region. Pre-excitation pacing as described above may also be employed to unload ischemic regions in either the atria or ventricles that are not associated with an infarct, which may act to prevent the development of angina in the patient or a subsequent infarct. Ischemic regions, whether or not associated with an infarct, can be identified with an angiogram, thallium scan or an MRI perfusion scan, and sites within ischemic regions so identified can be selected as pacing sites.
A device for delivering pre-excitation pacing therapy as described above may also have other functionality that can be of benefit to patients with ischemic heart disease, such as cardioversion/defibrillation. Drug delivery capability incorporated into the device may also be useful.
2. Electrode Placement
In order to place one or more pacing electrodes in proximity to an infarcted region, the area of the infarct can be identified by a number of means, including ultrasonic imaging, PET scans, thallium scans, and MRI perfusion scans. In the case of a left ventricular infarct, epicardial leads can either be placed directly on the epicardium with a thoracotomy (an open chest surgical operation) or a thorascopic procedure, or leads can be threaded from the upper venous system into a cardiac vein via the coronary sinus. (See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,160 issued to Auricchio et al., and assigned to Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc., which is hereby incorporated by reference.)
3. Exemplary Algorithm for Treating Acute MI
Although the invention has been described in conjunction with the foregoing specific embodiments, many alternatives, variations, and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Other such alternatives, variations, and modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the following appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/150,296, filed Apr. 25, 2008, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,050,761, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/088,231, filed Mar. 23, 2005, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,366,567, the specifications of which are herein incorporated by reference. This application is related to U.S. Pat. No. 6,973,349, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MINIMIZING POST-INFARCT VENTRICULAR REMODELING”, filed on Dec. 5, 2001, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4354497 | Kahn | Oct 1982 | A |
4549548 | Wittkampf et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4554922 | Prystowsky et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4628934 | Pohndorf et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4674518 | Salo | Jun 1987 | A |
4872459 | Pless et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4880005 | Pless et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4928688 | Mower | May 1990 | A |
5014698 | Cohen | May 1991 | A |
5058605 | Slovak | Oct 1991 | A |
5109842 | Adinolfi | May 1992 | A |
5156149 | Hudrlik | Oct 1992 | A |
5158079 | Adams et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5174289 | Cohen | Dec 1992 | A |
5233985 | Hudrlik | Aug 1993 | A |
5267560 | Cohen | Dec 1993 | A |
5370665 | Hudrlik | Dec 1994 | A |
5514161 | Limousin | May 1996 | A |
5534016 | Boute | Jul 1996 | A |
5584867 | Limousin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5674259 | Gray | Oct 1997 | A |
5683429 | Mehra | Nov 1997 | A |
5792203 | Schroeppel | Aug 1998 | A |
5797970 | Pouvreau | Aug 1998 | A |
5824019 | Rueter et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5851226 | Skubitz et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5935160 | Auricchio et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5995870 | Cazeau et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995871 | Knisley | Nov 1999 | A |
6038483 | KenKnight et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6058329 | Salo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066094 | Ben-Haim | May 2000 | A |
6112117 | KenKnight et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6151524 | Krig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152955 | KenKnight et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6223082 | Bakels et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6314322 | Rosenberg | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6363279 | Ben-Haim et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6418343 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6507756 | Heynen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6556872 | Hauck | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6574506 | Kramer et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6628988 | Kramer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6640135 | Salo et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6973349 | Salo | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7096064 | Deno et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7206634 | Ding et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7366567 | Zhu et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20020002389 | Bradley et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020082647 | Alferness et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020115081 | Lee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030023278 | Pastore et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030105493 | Salo | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030153952 | Auricchio et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030208240 | Pastore et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030233132 | Pastore et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040002626 | Feld et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030357 | Salo et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049236 | Kramer et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054381 | Pastore et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040172077 | Chinchoy | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040172079 | Chinchoy | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040220637 | Zdeblick et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050137631 | Yu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050234517 | Braunschweig et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050288720 | Ross et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060217773 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20080208274 | Zhu et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0522693 | Jan 1993 | EP |
WO-9910042 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO-0009206 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO-0176689 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO-02087694 | Nov 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,184, Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2004”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,184, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2005”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,184, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 19, 2005”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,184, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 10, 2004”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,184, Response filed May 17, 2005 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 17, 2005”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/005,184, Response filed Jul. 26, 2004 to Non Final Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2004”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/088,231, Notice of Allowance mailed Dec. 6, 2007”, NOAR, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/088,231, Response filed Mar. 13, 2007 to Non-Final Office Action mailed Nov. 13, 2006”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/088,231, Response filed Aug. 13, 2007 to Final Office Action mailed Jun. 12, 2007”, 7 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/088,231, Supplemental Notice of Allowance mailed Jan. 4, 2008”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 11/088,231, Supplemental Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 20, 2008”, 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,296, Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,296, Notice of Allowance mailed Jul. 11, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 12/150,296, Response filed May 21, 2011 to Non Final Office Action mailed Dec. 21, 2010”, 9 pgs. |
“Final Office Action Mailed Jun. 12, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/088,231”, 12 pgs. |
“Non-Final Office Action Mailed Nov. 13, 2006 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/088,231”, 11 pgs. |
Braunwald, N. S, et al., “Sustained Paired Electrical Stimuli; Slowing of the Ventricular Rate and Augmentation of Contractile Force”, American Journal of Cardiology, 14, (1964), pp. 285 & 385-393. |
Reiter, M. J., et al., “Electrophysiological Effects of Acute Dilatation in the Isolated Rabbit Hear”, Circulation, 96(11), (Dec. 2, 1997), 4050-4056. |
Sabbah, Hani N, et al., “Delivery of Non-Excitatory Contractility-Modulation Electric Signals Improve Left Ventricular Performance in Dogs with Heart Failure”, Circulation, 100(18), Supplement 1, (Abstract No. 631), (Nov. 2, 1999), p. 1-122. |
Watanabe, M., et al., “Developmental Remodeling and Shortening of Cardiac Outflow Tract Involves Myocyte Programmed Cell Death”, Development, 125(19), (1998), 3809-3820. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120041506 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12150296 | Apr 2008 | US |
Child | 13281096 | US | |
Parent | 11088231 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 12150296 | US |