Patent Grant
7833415
The present invention relates generally to wastewater treatment and in particular to the treatment of digest reject water.
Anaerobic digestion is a common method for stabilization of sludges produced during wastewater treatment. The anaerobic digestion or stabilization of sludges can be conducted under thermophilic or mesophilic conditions in a batch or a flow-through vessel, where anaerobic conditions are fostered to encourage fermentation and methanogenesis in the sludge biomass. The result is a decrease and removal of volatile solids that can cause putrefaction.
One example of a sludge digestion process is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,660,164 to Stover. In this patent, a one-step aerobic thermophilic process is described for treatment of waste streams. Other known treatment processes, such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,246,099 to Gould et al. The sludge treatment techniques discussed in that patent is a two-step process. In a first step, sludge is aerobically digested at a temperature from 35° C. to 75° C. Next, the sludge is anaerobically digested, preferably at a lower temperature.
Sludge treatments, like that described above, may consist of either a one-step treatment or a process that includes digestion of sludge under single-stage aerobic, single or multi-stage anaerobic or two-stage aerobic, followed by anaerobic conditions. However, these processes have several disadvantages:
1. Need for low nitrogen recycles. For a facility practicing nitrogen removal, the concentrated ammonia-nitrogen fraction in the reject liquor from anaerobic digestion needs to be treated either in a separate sidestream process or within the mainstream plant configuration, thus consuming significant capacity and operating expense (chemicals and aeration).
2. Need for improved volatile solids destruction. A decrease in volatile solids can reduce putrefaction and overall solids inventory (sludge minimization). Although anaerobic digestion can destroy volatile solids by as much as 50%, subsequent to anaerobic digestion, a significant fraction (a similar 50%) of volatile solids remain undigested. It is believed by the inventors that this undegraded volatile fraction is either inert or not accessible under anaerobic conditions. A further reduction in volatile solids can reduce putrefaction and reduce biosolids inventories (sludge minimization).
3. Need for improved dewatering. The biosolids from anaerobic digestion can consume considerable polymer demand during dewatering and produce variable cakes solids. A reduction in polymer demand and improvement to cake solids (sludge minimization) will benefit a facility by reducing operating costs.
4. Need for biosolids product quality improvements. Land application is an environmentally friendly, viable means of biosolids management and results in the recycling of nutrients and organics and thereby benefiting the soil for agriculture or reclamation. For many wastewater treatment plants in the United States, this viability is at a risk because of environmental pressures that result in a need to improve product quality-specifically reducing biosolids odors and treatment of endocrine disrupting and other trace chemicals. Reduction in odors and treatment of endocrine disrupting and other trace chemicals will improve product quality, marketability, reduce overall biosolids program risk, and increase the viability of the land application program.
Accordingly, there is a need and desire for a sludge processing and stabilization process and system that overcomes these disadvantages associated with the conventional wastewater treatment processing techniques.
The present invention, as illustrated in the various exemplary embodiments, includes an efficient process for sludge treatment. In a first step, raw sludge is input to anaerobic digester, which can be either a batch or continuous flow digester. This anaerobic step may be performed under either mesophilic and/or thermophilic conditions. Thereafter, the sludge is treated in a post-mesophilic aerobic/anoxic digester. This step can be performed under either single or multi-stage mesophilic and/or thermophilic conditions.
The foregoing and other aspects of the invention will be better understood from the following detailed description of the invention, which is provided in connection with the accompanying drawings, in which:
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof and show by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to enable those skilled in the art to practice the invention, and it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized, and that changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. The progression and details of the processing steps described are exemplary of embodiments of the invention; however, the invention is not limited to the described embodiments set forth herein and may be altered from the description, with the exception of steps necessarily occurring in a certain order.
Now, referring to the drawings where like numerals represent like elements the invention,
With reference to
The second aspect of the invention is to minimize sludge by producing additional volatile solids destruction during digestion in a two-step digestion process that cannot be achieved by anaerobic digestion alone. The two steps consisting of anaerobic bioreactor 10 and anoxic/aerobic bioreactor 20 achieves this additional volatile solids destruction by providing niche environmental conditions for degradation of substrates.
In either configuration, the first anaerobic digestion step 101 is followed by a mesophilic aerobic digestion step 102. In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the first anaerobic digestion step 101 has a solids retention time of between 2 and 25 days, and the mesophilic aerobic digestion step 102 has a solids retention time within the range of about 2 and about 15 days. It should be understood that the total process SRT should be approximately fifteen days average. Thus, if there is a smaller SRT in the anaerobic step, it needs to be made up with a larger SRT in the aerobic step, and vice-versa. In general, a greater SRT results in more thorough treatment.
As an example, if the SRT of the anaerobic step is greater than ten days, the optimum aerobic SRT for volatile solids destruction and nitrogen removal can be accomplished within the range of about 2-6 days. The dewatering, endocrine disrupter, trace pollutants and biosolids odor improvements would be optimized at a midrange SRT within the range of about 4-10 days. For an anaerobic step that has an SRT of less than ten days, the optimum aerobic SRT for nitrogen removal is optimized still within the range of about 2-6 days. For dewatering, biosolids destruction, endocrine disruption, and minimizing trace pollutants and odor, the optimum aerobic SRT is within the range of about 4-15 days.
In accordance with the invention, for the first thermophilic or mesophilic anaerobic step 101, the solids retention time can be substantially decreased from a conventional time of 20-25 days to as low as 2 days, and the remaining digestion is accommodated in the second aerobic step 102, having a retention time of approximately 15 days. In this way, the first anaerobic step 101 serves as a main digestion step followed by a polishing aerobic digestion step 102. Either operating mode enhances overall volatile solids destruction over and above that achieved by a single step mesophilic or thermophilic anaerobic digestion process. This aspect of the invention will reduce putrefaction and odor production potential in biosolids by effectively destroying precursors (such as protein) for odor production and by stimulating aerobic conditions that will discourage the growth or stimulation of odor producing microorganisms.
In a third aspect of the invention, the mesophilic aerobic digestion step 102 removes bound water and colloidal protein and polysaccharide in the biosolids in a manner to improve cake solids content (sludge minimization) and reduce polymer dose during dewatering operations.
In a fourth aspect of the invention, endocrine disrupting compounds and other trace pollutants are degraded by the alternating anaerobic and aerobic step in a manner not achieved in one step alone. The aerobic step should preferably proceed to nitrification to degrade these chemicals. Depending on the pollutant intended for destruction, the anaerobic step 101 solids retention time can vary between 2 and 25 days and the aerobic digestion step 102 can vary between 2 and 15 days solids retention time.
The simultaneous aerobic/anoxic digestion apparatus 20 is differentiated from an aeration apparatus that merely serves to ‘freshen’ digested biosolids. The term aerobic refers to developing populations that operate under aerobic conditions using oxygen as an electron acceptor and the term anoxic refers to developing denitrifying populations using nitrate or nitrite as an electron acceptor. The term aeration is the addition of air to the process with an expressed purpose of creating conditions for using oxygen as an electron acceptor. Developing populations of these aerobic and/or denitrifying organisms is necessary for addressing above needs. Sufficient oxygen transfer is required to convert anaerobic biosolids to aerobic product, produce nitrite and to reduce odors, and to simultaneously promote anoxic microzones in the biomass to promote simultaneous denitrification.
Accordingly, simultaneous aerobic/anoxic digestion is preferred over conventional digestion techniques. Simultaneous aerobic/anoxic conditions are achieved by modulating the air, such that dissolved oxygen and pH in the process simultaneously achieve niche aerobic and anoxic environments. Alternately, a pulsed aerobic-anoxic step is employed to achieve nitrification and denitrification. This pulsed condition is achieved by cycling air on and off to achieve the aerobic and anoxic conditions within a single reactor. Sequential aerobic and anoxic conditions is another alternative, which requires two separate reactors, one for each digestion process.
The relative benefits of these three alternative processes depends on the size of the plant and the equipment, such as reactors, that are available. The simultaneous aerobic/anoxic digestion may be a slightly preferred embodiment because it minimizes the operational issues and can be operated in a single reactor. However, if a system implementing the present invention had two smaller digest reactors, it would clearly be more beneficial to utilize the sequential aerobic/anoxic digestion. Defining other preferred parameters for a system, such as a volume of input air, the dissolved oxygen content, pH, etc., are dependant on the sludge input, and should thus be adjusted to the needs of a particular system.
In the aerobic step 320 or 420, a minimum SRT of 2 days is necessary to prevent washout of nitrifying (autotrophic) populations that result in the formation of nitrite. In a preferred embodiment, the SRT is within the range of about 3 to about 6 days. The temperature at the aerobic step 320, 420 should be between 20 and about 40° C.
For these processes 300, 400, sufficient oxygen transfer is required to covert anaerobic biosolids to aerobic product, produce nitrite and to reduce odors, remove endocrine disrupting and trace chemicals, and to simultaneously promote anoxic micro zones in the biomass to promote simultaneous denitrification. Alternatively, a sequential or pulsed aerobic-anoxic step is employed to achieve nitrification and denitrification.
With respect to the exemplary process 400 shown in
The processes and devices described above illustrate preferred methods and typical devices of many that could be used and produced. The above description and drawings illustrate embodiments, which achieve the objects, features, and advantages of the present invention. However, it is not intended that the present invention be strictly limited to the above-described and illustrated embodiments. Additionally, any modifications, though presently unforeseeable, of the present invention that come within the spirit and scope of the following claims should be considered part of the present invention.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/730,027, filed on Oct. 26, 2005, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 624985 | Scott-Moncrieff | May 1899 | A |
| 3345288 | Sontheimer | Oct 1967 | A |
| 4056465 | Spector | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4134830 | Skogman et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
| 4246099 | Gould | Jan 1981 | A |
| 4271026 | Chen et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
| 4315821 | Climenhage | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4461708 | Hakulinen et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4488968 | Hong et al. | Dec 1984 | A |
| 4559142 | Morper | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4800021 | Desbos | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4915841 | Lagana′ et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4919815 | Copa et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 5196111 | Nicol et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5223140 | Rutherford et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
| 5266200 | Reid | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5540839 | Pirt | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5543051 | Harris | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5601719 | Hawkins et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5605629 | Rogalla | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5746919 | Dague | May 1998 | A |
| 6015496 | Khudenko | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6660164 | Stover | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676836 | Mandt | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6685834 | Murthy et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
| 6719903 | Pressley et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6730224 | Blackburn | May 2004 | B2 |
| 6936170 | Shieh et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
| 7172699 | Trivedi et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
| 7407584 | Lemoine et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7422688 | Ekeroth | Sep 2008 | B2 |
| 20030142301 | Coleman et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20050028680 | Thompson et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050087480 | Park et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
| 20050145566 | Haase et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070102353 A1 | May 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60730027 | Oct 2005 | US |
