Method for tuning patient-specific cardiovascular simulations

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8200466
  • Patent Number
    8,200,466
  • Date Filed
    Monday, July 21, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 12, 2012
    12 years ago
Abstract
Computational methods are used to create cardiovascular simulations having desired hemodynamic features. Cardiovascular modeling methods produce descriptions of blood flow and pressure in the heart and vascular networks. Numerical methods optimize and solve nonlinear equations to find parameter values that result in desired hemodynamic characteristics including related flow and pressure at various locations in the cardiovascular system, movements of soft tissues, and changes for different physiological states. The modeling methods employ simplified models to approximate the behavior of more complex models with the goal of to reducing computational expense. The user describes the desired features of the final cardiovascular simulation and provides minimal input, and the system automates the search for the final patient-specific cardiovascular model.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


This invention relates generally to computer-assisted modeling and planning systems and in particular to a computer-assisted human anatomic and physiologic modeling system used to predict outcomes of medical intervention and further to predict changes in physiologic function under various states, stresses, and environments and still further to generate data for disease research or medical device design.


2. Discussion of Prior Art


Disclosed in Kamm et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,087, is a method and apparatus for deriving a physiological description and clinically-useful data regarding the cardiovascular system of an individual subject. The method includes obtaining a measurement sample associated with cardiovascular flow and utilizing a model, which may be distributed and/or non-linear to derive a description and data. The model generates and uses functions of source parameters and may, in an embodiment, match measurement samples against a library of stored, predicted samples. A best-matching, predicted sample may then be associated with a measurement sample. An apparatus is provided that, according to an embodiment, includes an input for obtaining a measurement sample, a processor to derive the description and data, and an output. The apparatus may also include a digital storage medium to store a library of predicted samples.


Disclosed in Taylor et al., U.S. Pat. No. 6,236,878, is a method for predictive modeling of human anatomy and physiologic function for planning medical interventions on at least one portion of a body with the goals of improving the outcome of the medical intervention and reducing the risks associated with medical intervention. The method comprises the steps of generation of multi-dimensional continuous geometric models of human anatomy, the generation of models of physiologic functions, the integration of the multi-dimensional continuous geometric human anatomy models with the physiologic functional models, and the use of the integrated models to predict the outcome of medical interventions. Also disclosed is a method for the integration of multi-dimensional continuous geometric models of human anatomy and models of physiologic functions to evaluate and predict changes in physiologic function in various functional states, stresses and environments and a method for generating data for disease research.


A method and apparatus for modeling circulation in a living subject is disclosed in Charbel et al, U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,110. The method includes the steps of developing a model for living subjects in general and correcting the model to substantially conform to the overall cerebral physiology of the living subject. The method further includes the step of calculating a cerebral flow of the living subject based upon the corrected model and a selected cerebral blood flow perturbation.


The paper by Spilker et al., Ann Biomed Eng (2007) 35:546-559. DOI 10.1007/s10439-006-9240-3, demonstrates the tuning of a model of pulmonary arterial hemodynamics with morphometry-based impedance outlet boundary conditions. A reduced-order model using steady flow was used to help initialize the tuning of a mean flow fraction and mean pressure of a more detailed model.


The paper by Ellwein et al., Cardiovasc Eng (2008) 8:73-87. DOI 10.1007/s10558-007-9050-8, describes a search for parameter values for unsteady cardiovascular simulations. This work involved tuning lumped-parameter models and, more specifically, models that were reduced to systems of ordinary differential equations (ODE's), which were solved with numerical methods for temporal integration of ODE's. An effort was made to identify the parameters to which the cardiovascular model was most sensitive.


This invention incorporates tuning of reduced-order models of unsteady cardiovascular dynamics and, in addition, reduced-order models that can be solved more quickly using Fourier analysis. In addition, this invention provides the framework for tuning features of time-varying hemodynamic simulations that allows the user to choose either a single objective function that combines many objectives, as in the work of Ellwein et al., or a set of objectives of the same size as the set of parameters so that a solution of a nonlinear system can be sought. This novel use of a limited set of features of the hemodynamic simulations as objectives can give the user control over the most important aspects of the simulation and may save computational energy.


A key difference between this invention and Kamm et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,117,087, Taylor et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,236,878, Charbel et al. U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,110, and the work of Ellwein et al. is this invention's use of these less detailed models in the process of tuning hemodynamic simulations that are significantly more computationally expensive. This difference makes this invention most valuable when implemented in software for modeling blood flow in three dimensions for the purposes of intervention planning, disease research and medical device design and evaluation. Previous work does not describe time-varying hemodynamic models of various degrees of complexity and their connection to one another. This aspect of this invention, along with the automation of the tuning process, will save users and computers significant time and effort.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Cardiovascular models have the potential to improve our understanding of the mechanics of the circulatory system in healthy and diseased states and to provide quantitative predictions of the outcomes of various interventions to aid in planning treatments. In order to serve this purpose, hemodynamic simulations must have the ability to faithfully represent a patient's circulation prior to treatment. Recent advances in the fidelity of hemodynamic simulations include the use of anatomic models constructed from medical image data, deformation of vascular walls, and improved representation of downstream vascular beds using appropriate outlet boundary conditions. This invention provides a method for employing these capabilities, enabling the systematic tuning of a hemodynamic simulation's parameters such that its hemodynamic characteristics match more than simply patient-specific vascular geometry, inlet flow, mean flow rates, and mean pressures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING


FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating an embodiment of the method of the present invention for tuning patient-specific hemodynamic simulations.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present invention applies computational methods to create cardiovascular simulations having desired hemodynamic features. A variety of cardiovascular modeling methods can be used to produce descriptions of time-varying blood flow and pressure in the heart and vascular networks. Numerical methods for optimization and solution of nonlinear systems of equations are used to find values for the parameters used in such models that result in simulations that match desired hemodynamic characteristics. These characteristics will often be those of the cardiovascular system of a particular subject. A variety of modeling methods are used for the same cardiovascular system such that more simplified models can be used to approximate the behavior of more detailed and complex models, which may lead to reduced computational expense. A system is created from these methods such that the user describes the desired features of the final cardiovascular simulation and provides minimal input, and the system automates the search for the final cardiovascular model.


Embodiments of this invention address cardiovascular models with a variety of parameters including, but not limited to, resistances, impedances, compliances, inductances, cardiac chamber elastances, material parameters of tissues, vascular network structures, and changes in these parameters with changes in physiological, disease, and interventional states. Also included are relationships between the various parameters of the models, including time constants defined by combinations of resistances and capacitors in lumped-parameter regions of cardiovascular models.


The desired features, called objectives, of the cardiovascular models addressed by embodiments of this invention include, but are not limited to, features of pressure waveforms, features of flow waveforms, features of time-varying velocity fields, features of transport, features of cardiac volume, features of tissue movements, and variations in these features with changes in physiological, disease, and interventional states. Relevant features of a time-varying quantity include the maximum, minimum, median, mean value over a certain portion of the cardiac cycle, and values at particular times.


The computational expense of solving the mathematical equations associated with a model of the cardiovascular system is generally related to the model's level of detail. The cost of solving these equations for several sets of values of a highly detailed model's parameters can be prohibitive. This motivates the approximation of a highly detailed model's behavior in a model that can be evaluated less expensively. For example, a numerical solution of the mechanics of blood flow and vascular motion in a three-dimensional arterial network with inlet boundary conditions representing the movement of the heart, outlet boundary conditions involving lumped-parameter models that approximate the behavior of downstream vascular networks, and deformable vessel walls has a high computational cost. This model's flow waveforms may be approximated, in an embodiment of this invention, by a lumped-parameter model that includes the inlet and outlet boundary conditions of the complex model and lumped-parameter models that approximate the impedances of the flow pathways from the inlet to the outlets, called intrinsic impedances. The reduced-order model allows testing many values for the lumped parameters of the inlet and outlet boundary conditions with low computational cost and can be used to help find a combination of these values that produces desired hemodynamic features in the highly detailed model. If the successful parameters of the lumped-parameter model do not meet the same success in the highly detailed model, the lumped-parameter model can be adjusted to contain more accurate intrinsic impedances. Other embodiments reduce the intrinsic impedances of the highly detailed model to impedance spectra in the reduced-order model.


Some embodiments of this method rely on less detailed models only to provide an initial estimate of the parameters of the more detailed models that will result in the desired hemodynamic features. Some embodiments use the less detailed models to determine the variations in cardiovascular model outputs with variations in parameter values.


The application of a preferred embodiment of this invention to the tuning of a specific model of blood flow in the abdominal aorta provides an illustrative example of the method disclosed herein. Patient-specific flow waveforms are measured in two locations, one proximal to the celiac bifurcation and one distal to the renal arteries. Maximum and minimum blood pressures are recorded. A detailed model is chosen, consisting of a geometric model of the abdominal aorta and its largest branch vessels, created from medical image data, a highly refined mesh of the geometric model on which the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations are solved in three-dimensions using a finite element method. Vessel wall deformations are modeled. Measured flow is applied at the inlet, and outlet boundary conditions are impedances of three-element windkessel lumped-parameter models. The objectives are the desired maximum, minimum, and median of the pressure waveform, the amplitude and diastolic mean value of the measured infrarenal flow waveform, and the mean flow through the infrarenal plane. A set of parameters is chosen by varying several sets of parameters and observing the resulting changes in flow and pressure waveforms. The model parameters chosen to be tuned are the total resistance of the outlets proximal to the infrarenal plane, the total resistance of the distal outlets, and mean values and ratios of the values of the following two quantities for the three-element windkessels proximal and distal to the plane: the ratio of the proximal resistor to the total resistance and the time constant, defined by the product of the capacitance and the distal resistance. Resistances of the outlet vessels are determined by the total resistance of the region to which they belong and the approximate mean flow fractions found in the literature. The tuning of the boundary condition parameters is formulated as a system of six nonlinear equations in six unknowns, seeking a root where the simulated and measured hemodynamic conditions match. This nonlinear system is solved using a quasi-Newton method where each function evaluation requires one three-dimensional simulation. The Jacobian of this system is updated using a version of Broyden's method in which attention is paid to scaling of the different parameters to distribute the secant updates appropriately. The objectives are evaluated first using a reduced-order model consisting of the impedances of the three-element windkessels in parallel. This lumped-parameter model is solved to determine the initial boundary condition parameters for the three-dimensional model. Three-dimensional simulations are run on a coarse initial mesh with a boundary layer at the vessel wall. When a solution of this model is found, the mesh is further refined, more boundary layers are added, and the tuning continues until the simulation on an adequately refined mesh matches the objectives to a desired tolerance. This example illustrates the tuning of parameters that are related to resistances and capacitances. It also illustrates the use of a lumped-parameter model as a reduced-order model for the more detailed cardiovascular model.


This invention employs a range of levels of detail in cardiovascular models. One possible increase in the level of detail is a change from a model using prescribed flow in a blood vessel to a model using an elastance-based model of a cardiac chamber. This allows the prediction of the reaction of the heart to changes in afterload. Another possible increase in the level of detail comes with a change from a model that can be described by a system of ordinary differential equations that can be solved with Fourier analysis to a model that can be described by a system of ordinary differential equations that must be solved with numerical methods for temporal integration. This may occur when a cardiovascular model with an elastance-based heart model is desired. Increases in the level of detail of cardiovascular models also are associated with a change from a model assuming rigid vascular walls to a model assuming more realistic representations of these walls and, in numerical solutions of partial differential equations governing the cardiovascular system, increasingly refined computational meshes and increasingly complete polynomial bases.


The steps in a preferred embodiment of the method for tuning patient-specific hemodynamic simulations are shown in FIG. 1. The parameters for the least detailed model of the cardiovascular system are initialized 100. This step can be aided by prior knowledge of ranges of values for each parameter of such a model. Next, the solution of the mathematical equations governing the current model is sought 150. This includes the determination of the change in the model's features with changes in the model's parameters. A first determination 200 is made if the solution satisfies the objectives within tolerances. If it does, then a second determination 250 is made if a more detailed model is desired. If one is not, then the method has reached a final solution 350. If the second determination 250 is that a more complex model is needed, then a second model 300 is used wherein the level of detail of the second model is increased. The more complex second model 300 is then solved 150 and the process repeated. If the first determination 200 does not satisfy the objectives within tolerances, a third determination 400 is made if a less detailed model can be updated to reproduce current results. If it can, a third model with a reduced level of detail is updated 450 such that it reproduces, within a reasonable tolerance, the important aspects of the more detailed model's results. The less detailed model is then solved 150. If the third determination 400 is that a less detailed model cannot be updated to reproduce current results, then a new model 500 is created by updating the parameters of the current model 150, and the method is repeated until the method has reached a final solution 350.


In a related embodiment of this invention, a less detailed model that approximates the results of a more detailed cardiovascular model is produced as the final result of the tuning procedure. Less detailed models can be used to succinctly characterize cardiovascular systems and in applications requiring rapid simulations, such as the study of relationships between a model's parameters and its behavior.


Some embodiments of this invention involve evaluation of the appropriateness of parameter sets for achieving objectives of cardiovascular dynamics. Certain sets of parameters are associated with better performance of tuning procedures. Parameter sets to which all components of the objective functions are adequately sensitive are desired. Evaluation of various parameter sets can be performed quickly using representative models with less detail.


This invention solves the problem of making cardiovascular simulations match desired hemodynamic characteristics without excessive and ad hoc user interactions. Systematic tuning is enabled by the formulation of one of several problems. A single objective function can be chosen to summarize the differences between the desired and current features of the cardiovascular model. Embodiments with such a cost function employ optimization methods that minimize this difference. In other embodiments having the same number of parameters as objectives, a solution of a system of nonlinear equations is sought. In other embodiments, a solution of a nonlinear least-squares problem is sought. Numerical methods for solving each of these problems are chosen such that the number of function evaluations is kept low. Finite-difference evaluations of Hessian and Jacobian matrices are reduced, in some embodiments, by use of secant updates. Estimates of these matrices are created, in some embodiments, using evaluations of less detailed models.


Highly detailed cardiovascular models may require the use of lumped parameters to represent regions of the cardiovascular system. To aid in the process of choosing parameters for these models without repeated calculation, an embodiment of this invention determines relationships between lumped parameter values and parameters of more detailed distributed cardiovascular models by approximating these more detailed models with lumped-parameter models. The derived relationships can be stored and used by other embodiments to save computational effort.


Several embodiments of the present invention involve analysis of variations of the parameters of cardiovascular models. Patient-specific measurements have natural variations and, when associated with tuned sets of parameters, can provide succinct information about variability of the individual's cardiovascular system. Members of a class of patients can likewise be analyzed for variability within that class of patients. Related embodiments use such information on variability to analyze ranges of potential outcomes of treatments.


The present invention improves upon existing methods by providing a framework for creating state-of-the-art, detailed cardiovascular models that have desired hemodynamic characteristics with methods that automate the procedure and seek to minimize the computational effort. Existing methods use simplified mathematical models or seek to match only temporal mean values of time-varying quantities. Automation of the process allows users to request features of pressure, flow, vascular motion, cardiac motion, and other physiological data and, after providing anatomic and physiological information for the desired cardiovascular model, take no further action while the system produces a mathematical vascular model with the requested results. This capability enables the creation of patient-specific simulations and predictions of the cardiovascular response to various treatments.


Variations can be created from the general approach defined herein. A variety of cardiovascular modeling methods can be used to create the models with various levels of detail and simplifying assumptions. A variety of numerical methods can be used to tune parameters of the cardiovascular models. A variety of sets of hemodynamic objectives and parameters can also be chosen. A variety of algorithms can be chosen to link models of various levels of detail.


In surgical treatment planning, this invention can be used to create cardiovascular models that match hemodynamic features of a specific patient before predicting the results of a variety of surgical options. In medical device development, this invention can be used to create cardiovascular models that match a variety of possible physiological situations to use in simulating the effects of devices on blood flow and pressure or the forces acting on devices that might affect their short-term and long-term safety and efficacy. In cardiovascular tissue engineering, this invention can be used to create cardiovascular models with realistic pressure, flow, and deformation to develop an understanding of the biomechanical environment of tissues.


The present invention allows the user to predict hemodynamic results of interventions without expensive biological experiments thereby reducing user interaction time and computational expense to create realistic cardiovascular models.

Claims
  • 1. A system for determining cardiovascular information for a patient, the system comprising: at least one computer system configured to: receive patient-specific data regarding a geometry of an anatomical structure of the patient;create, based on the patient-specific data, a three-dimensional model representing at least a portion of the aorta of the patient and at least a portion of a plurality of vessels emanating from the portion of the aorta, the three-dimensional model including portions representing at least one inlet and a plurality of outlets for blood flow;create a three-dimensional mesh based on the three-dimensional model;create at least one boundary condition model having less than three dimensions, the at least one boundary condition model representing blood flow through at least one of the at least one inlet or the plurality of outlets;determine a blood flow characteristic within the anatomical structure of the patient by solving equations governing blood flow using the three-dimensional mesh and the at least one boundary condition model; andautomatically tune at least one parameter of the three-dimensional model or the at least one boundary condition model.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one boundary condition model includes at least one resistor configured to characterize flow through at least one of the plurality of outlets.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one boundary condition model includes at least one impedance model configured to characterize flow through at least one of the plurality of outlets.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein the anatomical structure includes at least a portion of the patient's heart.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one boundary condition model includes an elastance-based model of a cardiac chamber.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one computer system is configured to determine the blood flow characteristic in at least the portion of the aorta of the patient and at least the portion of the plurality of vessels emanating from the portion of the aorta.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, wherein a numerical method employed for modifying the at least one parameter includes at least one member of the group consisting of optimization, a solution of a system of nonlinear equations, and a solution of a nonlinear least-squares problem.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one computer system is further configured to determine the blood flow characteristic based on at least one blood pressure measured in the patient.
  • 9. The system of claim 1, wherein the patient-specific data includes imaging data.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein the blood flow characteristic includes at least one of blood flow or pressure within the anatomical structure of the patient.
  • 11. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one parameter includes at least one of resistance, impedance, compliance, inductance, cardiac chamber elastance, morphometry of vascular networks, or material parameters of tissue.
  • 12. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one parameter is automatically tuned in order to bring a determined value of a property of the three-dimensional model or the at least one boundary condition model closer to a desired value.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the property relates to at least one of a pressure waveform, a flow waveform, a time-varying velocity field, transport, cardiac volume, or tissue movement.
  • 14. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one computer system is further configured to automatically tune the at least one parameter until a difference between the determined value and the desired value is below a tolerance.
  • 15. The system of claim 12, wherein the desired value is based on a measured parameter.
  • 16. The system of claim 12, wherein the at least one parameter is automatically tuned until a property of the three-dimensional model or the at least one boundary condition model approximates the desired value.
  • 17. The system of claim 1, wherein: the at least one boundary condition model includes a plurality of boundary condition models representing blood flow through each of the at least one inlet and the plurality of outlets, respectively; andeach of the plurality of boundary condition models includes at least one parameter that is automatically tuned.
  • 18. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one computer system is further configured to change a resolution of the three-dimensional mesh when the at least one parameter is automatically tuned.
  • 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one computer system is further configured to change the at least one boundary condition model when the at least one parameter is automatically tuned.
  • 20. The system of claim 1, wherein: the three-dimensional model includes at least one rigid blood vessel wall; andthe at least one computer system is further configured to replace the at least one rigid blood vessel wall with a less rigid blood vessel wall when the at least one parameter is automatically tuned.
  • 21. The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one computer system is configured to solve the equations using values determined from the three-dimensional mesh and the boundary condition model.
  • 22. A method for determining patient-specific cardiovascular information using at least one computer system, the method comprising: inputting into the at least one computer system patient-specific data regarding a geometry of an anatomical structure of the patient;creating, using the at least one computer system and based on the patient-specific data, a three-dimensional model representing at least a portion of the aorta of the patient and at least a portion of a plurality of vessels emanating from the portion of the aorta, the three-dimensional model including portions representing at least one inlet and a plurality of outlets for blood flow;creating a three-dimensional mesh based on the three-dimensional model;creating at least one first model having less than three dimensions, the at least one first model representing blood flow through at least one of the at least one inlet or the plurality of outlets;determining, using the at least one computer system, a blood flow characteristic within the anatomical structure of the patient by solving equations governing blood flow using the three-dimensional mesh and the at least one first model; andcreating at least one second model having less than three dimensions, the at least one second model representing at least a portion of the three-dimensional model of the patient and created based on the patient-specific data and on the determined blood flow characteristic.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the second model includes at least one resistor configured to characterize flow in the second model.
  • 24. The method of claim 22, wherein the second model includes at least one impedance model configured to characterize flow in the second model.
  • 25. The method of claim 22, wherein the blood flow characteristic is determined at a plurality of locations within the anatomical structure of the patient.
  • 26. The method of claim 22, wherein the blood flow characteristic is determined by using a finite element method on the mesh.
  • 27. The method of claim 22, wherein: the patient-specific data includes imaging data of the patient; andthe three-dimensional mesh represents at least the portion of the aorta of the patient and at least the portion of the plurality of vessels emanating from the portion of the aorta.
  • 28. The method of claim 22, wherein the blood flow characteristic is determined based on a blood pressure measured in the patient.
  • 29. A non-transitory computer readable medium for use on at least one computer system containing computer-executable programming instructions for performing a method for determining patient-specific cardiovascular information, the method comprising: receiving patient-specific data regarding a geometry of an anatomical structure of the patient;creating, based on the patient-specific data, a three-dimensional model representing at least a portion of the aorta of the patient and at least a portion of a plurality of vessels emanating from the portion of the aorta, the three-dimensional model including at least one inlet for blood flow and a plurality of outlets for blood flow;creating a three-dimensional mesh based on the three-dimensional model;creating at least one boundary condition model having less than three dimensions, the at least one boundary condition model representing blood flow through at least one of the at least one inlet or the plurality of outlets;determining a blood flow characteristic within the anatomical structure of the patient by solving equations governing blood flow using the three-dimensional mesh and the at least one boundary condition model; andautomatically tuning at least one parameter of the three-dimensional model or the at least one boundary condition model.
  • 30. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 29, wherein the at least one boundary condition model includes at least one resistor configured to characterize flow through at least one of the plurality of outlets.
  • 31. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 29, the method further comprising: determining a plurality of mean flow fractions corresponding to the plurality of outlets, wherein the blood flow characteristic is determined based on the plurality of mean flow fractions.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERAL RIGHTS

This invention was made in part with government support under Grant Number 0205741 awarded by the National Science Foundation.

US Referenced Citations (158)
Number Name Date Kind
5119816 Gevins Jun 1992 A
5151856 Halmann et al. Sep 1992 A
5205289 Hardy et al. Apr 1993 A
5235510 Yamada et al. Aug 1993 A
5582173 Li Dec 1996 A
5682886 Delp et al. Nov 1997 A
5687208 Bae et al. Nov 1997 A
5687737 Branham et al. Nov 1997 A
5729670 Strumolo et al. Mar 1998 A
5740802 Nafis et al. Apr 1998 A
5782762 Vining Jul 1998 A
5825908 Pieper et al. Oct 1998 A
5871018 Delp et al. Feb 1999 A
5920319 Vining et al. Jul 1999 A
5947899 Winslow et al. Sep 1999 A
6026173 Svenson et al. Feb 2000 A
6047080 Chen et al. Apr 2000 A
6083162 Vining Jul 2000 A
6117087 Kramm Sep 2000 A
6169917 Masotti et al. Jan 2001 B1
6176838 Sase Jan 2001 B1
6236878 Taylor May 2001 B1
6272366 Vining Aug 2001 B1
6278460 Myers et al. Aug 2001 B1
6366800 Vining et al. Apr 2002 B1
6379041 Schuetz et al. Apr 2002 B1
6381562 Keane Apr 2002 B2
6442235 Koppe et al. Aug 2002 B2
6466205 Simpson et al. Oct 2002 B2
6487432 Slack Nov 2002 B2
6501848 Carroll et al. Dec 2002 B1
6606091 Liang et al. Aug 2003 B2
6628743 Drummond et al. Sep 2003 B1
6650724 Strobel Nov 2003 B2
6666820 Poole Dec 2003 B1
6694163 Vining Feb 2004 B1
6711433 Geiger et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718004 Cesmeli Apr 2004 B2
6720966 Barth et al. Apr 2004 B2
6793496 Edic et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801643 Pieper Oct 2004 B2
6898453 Lee May 2005 B2
6909913 Vining Jun 2005 B2
6932842 Litschko et al. Aug 2005 B1
6950689 Willis et al. Sep 2005 B1
6996262 Li Feb 2006 B2
7006955 Daft et al. Feb 2006 B2
7121832 Hsieh et al. Oct 2006 B2
7149333 Pieper et al. Dec 2006 B2
7149564 Vining et al. Dec 2006 B2
7182602 Lakin et al. Feb 2007 B2
7191110 Charbel Mar 2007 B1
7229412 Jacob et al. Jun 2007 B2
7286866 Okerlund et al. Oct 2007 B2
7302286 Camus et al. Nov 2007 B2
7321677 Evron et al. Jan 2008 B2
7327862 Murphy et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333643 Murphy et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333648 Edic et al. Feb 2008 B2
7343196 Okerlund et al. Mar 2008 B2
7356367 Liang et al. Apr 2008 B2
7369691 Kondo et al. May 2008 B2
7371067 Anderson et al. May 2008 B2
7462153 Bostian et al. Dec 2008 B2
7474776 Kaufman et al. Jan 2009 B2
7505551 Grass et al. Mar 2009 B2
7526112 Murphy et al. Apr 2009 B2
7536042 Murphy et al. May 2009 B2
7539529 Schmitt et al. May 2009 B2
7542595 Moreau-Gobard Jun 2009 B2
7574026 Rasche et al. Aug 2009 B2
7646900 Movassaghi et al. Jan 2010 B2
7646901 Murphy et al. Jan 2010 B2
7693563 Suresh et al. Apr 2010 B2
7725164 Suurmond et al. May 2010 B2
7725165 Chen et al. May 2010 B2
7738626 Weese et al. Jun 2010 B2
7739090 Charbel et al. Jun 2010 B2
7742629 Zarkh et al. Jun 2010 B2
7747055 Vining et al. Jun 2010 B1
7751984 Tang Jul 2010 B2
7773719 Galant et al. Aug 2010 B2
7773785 Murphy et al. Aug 2010 B2
7792565 Vining Sep 2010 B2
7792593 Rahn et al. Sep 2010 B2
7805177 Chen et al. Sep 2010 B2
7813785 Okerlund et al. Oct 2010 B2
7853310 Vining et al. Dec 2010 B2
20020002447 Keane Jan 2002 A1
20020035458 Kim et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020120431 Keane Aug 2002 A1
20030023266 Borillo et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030123606 Mollus et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040034309 Pullan et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040049115 Murphy et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040064298 Levine Apr 2004 A1
20050010105 Sra Jan 2005 A1
20050018885 Chen et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050043609 Murphy et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050131663 Bangs et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050272992 O'Donnell et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060142984 Weese et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060166176 Lakin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171585 Rinck et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060239528 Camus et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241445 Altmann et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060241461 White et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060253024 Altmann et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060278245 Gan Dec 2006 A1
20070014452 Suresh et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070078325 Fuimaono et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070219448 Seip et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070231779 Santhanam et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070238999 Specht Oct 2007 A1
20070293936 Dobak, III Dec 2007 A1
20080004508 Sun et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080020362 Cotin et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080040087 Watrous Feb 2008 A1
20080118122 Sirohey et al. May 2008 A1
20080177172 John et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080205722 Schaefer et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080208068 Robertson et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080228086 Ilegbusi et al. Sep 2008 A1
20080262346 Assis et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262814 Zheng et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080269611 Pedrizzetti et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080270095 Lombaert et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275336 Deschamps et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294038 Weese et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080317310 Suresh et al. Dec 2008 A1
20080319308 Tang Dec 2008 A1
20090016483 Kawasaki et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090054774 Njemanze Feb 2009 A1
20090156933 Gerard et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090161938 Shekhar et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090177454 Bronstein et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090281423 Sirohey et al. Nov 2009 A1
20090281434 Messerges Nov 2009 A1
20090292206 Sato Nov 2009 A1
20090310840 Mohamed et al. Dec 2009 A1
20090324052 Nowinski Dec 2009 A1
20100053209 Rauch et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100070249 Ionasec et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100081917 Zhang et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100086099 Kuzmanovic Apr 2010 A1
20100130878 Lasso et al. May 2010 A1
20100152570 Navab Jun 2010 A1
20100156898 Voros et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100183206 Carlsen et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100189337 Jandt et al. Jul 2010 A1
20100241404 Taylor et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100265251 Vining et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100266176 Masumoto et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100272315 Tsin et al. Oct 2010 A1
20100280352 Ionasec et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100298719 Kock et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100328305 Vining Dec 2010 A1
20110152599 Bokeriya et al. Jun 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (63)
Number Date Country
0 559 919 Sep 1993 EP
1 182 619 Feb 2002 EP
1 225 541 Jul 2002 EP
1 482 470 Dec 2004 EP
1 492 071 Dec 2004 EP
0 961 993 Feb 2005 EP
1 717 758 Nov 2006 EP
1 717 759 Nov 2006 EP
1 961 384 Aug 2008 EP
1 967 140 Sep 2008 EP
2 028 608 Feb 2009 EP
2 138 091 Dec 2009 EP
2 302 594 Mar 2011 EP
2 302 595 Mar 2011 EP
2 302 596 Mar 2011 EP
WO 9408315 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9526682 Oct 1995 WO
WO 9638815 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9641567 Dec 1996 WO
WO 9717894 May 1997 WO
WO 9749065 Dec 1997 WO
WO 9811524 Mar 1998 WO
WO 9832371 Jul 1998 WO
WO 9843201 Oct 1998 WO
WO 9938433 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9942977 Aug 1999 WO
WO 9963887 Dec 1999 WO
WO 0007501 Feb 2000 WO
WO 0032106 Jun 2000 WO
WO 0055812 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0055814 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0068749 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0072272 Nov 2000 WO
WO 0122362 Mar 2001 WO
WO 0185030 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0229764 Apr 2002 WO
WO 02095686 Nov 2002 WO
WO 03034336 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03060553 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03081529 Oct 2003 WO
WO 2004010374 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004012152 Feb 2004 WO
WO 2004066807 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2004068406 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2004072903 Aug 2004 WO
WO 2005004038 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005004721 Jan 2005 WO
WO 2005027765 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005031635 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2005083633 Sep 2005 WO
WO 2005119578 Dec 2005 WO
WO 2006002353 Jan 2006 WO
WO 2006020920 Feb 2006 WO
WO 2006061815 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006066122 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006079042 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006082558 Aug 2006 WO
WO 2007020555 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007066249 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2007102858 Sep 2007 WO
WO 2008030192 Mar 2008 WO
WO 2009007910 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009056147 May 2009 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100017171 A1 Jan 2010 US