The present patent application involves a method and system specially designed to put into practice the procedure intended to unblock the air/gas blow nozzles of reactors or fusion converters in pyromelallurgy in the mining industry. Particularly, the application is directed to a method and system of injection of high pressure and rate air impacts which inhibit the occurrence of blocking accretions in the inner end of air/gas blow nozzle of a converter or fusion reactor in fur metallurgy.
The occurrence of blocking accretions in O2-enriched air blow nozzles in reactors or fusion converters has a relevant effect on the lifetime period and the performance of pyrometallurgic facilities in the mining industry, specially the reactors or converters used in the copper industry. These air blow nozzles are used for injecting enriched air under the level of the bath to a moderate pressure, between 15 and 20 psi (1,034 and 1,378 bar), generally in a horizontal position, and configured as tubes embedded into the refractory material of the reactor or converter.
The discharge of this relatively cold enriched air into the melting bath, which has a temperature near to 1300° C., produces the phenomenon of localized solidification in form of accretions which, because the shapes adopted (see
At the present time, the most used way to eliminate the blocking accretions is by means of a punching bar operated from a machine especially intended for that; for instance, a GASPE machine. This punching bar is a metalic rod which is inserted through the hole situated in the outer end of the blow nozzle.
The punching has the disadvantage that the effect of such a procedure is based in a total or partial mechanical extraction of the accretion. When the sharp end of the punching bar hits such accretions, the breaking or splitting of the refractory imterial which surrounds the inner end of the nozzle generally occurs. Moreover, the procedure can fracture or even break the tube which is part of the very nozzle. While this occurs, the refractory wall is weakened therefore the lifetime of the reactor or converter is decreased.
The punching bar is introduced visually by an operator who is in a cabin located to a significant distance from each nozzle. From there, the operator must aim each hole of the nozzle with the bar, which involves a long time for introducing and subsequently pulling the bar. By the other side, since the bar contacts the melting bath to temperatures over 1200° C., it produces geometric deformations and degenerations in the constitution of the steel, material from which the bar is composed. Thus, the bar looses its thermophysical characteristics and such a deformation occurs. Therefore, when the operator must insert the bar into the next nozzle, if he does not aim correctly to the hole of that nozzle, a deformation of the sharp end of the hot punching bar is produced. This involves violent detachment of the blocking accretion and dragging with it part of the refractory material adhered.
By the other side, when the bar is retired from the inner part of a nozzle, resistance is generated because part of the material from the melting bath is dragged with it. Then, this material stays in the tubes which comprise the nozzles. This material adhered to the inner part of the nozzle tube produces alterations in its structure, like porosities in which a larger accretion will be adhered, provoking an uncontrolled erosion of the very length of the tube which is part of the nozzle.
Considering the problems with the previous art, the present application solves them in a great proportion through an injection system of air blast (i.e., “impacts”) at high pressure and rate, which have the tendency to produce a non-obstructive directed accretion.
The advantages of this invention are related with the following: when a high pressure air impact, between 70 and 100 psi (4.82 and 6.89 bar), is injected, the air enters more deeper in the melting bath improving the fusion conditions and decreasing the “splashing” close to the refractory material, preventing its premature erosion by friction. On the other hand, since the accretions inside of the converter and suffounding the internal end of the nozzle are produced after 1 minute of enriched air blowing through the nozzle, the making of a high pressure and rate air impact injection allows to inhibit the formation of an obstructive accretion. On the contrary, as is possible to see in the
At the same way, since the fact that a bar or other mechanical element for removing accretions is not used, the dragging of material from melting bath through the tube towards the outside of nozzle and then the tube itself is not prematurely eroded.
When the directed accretion has been formed as a tubular extention, a natural lengthening of the nozzle is obtained of a distance “s” (
The invention is a system and method intended to unblock the air or gas blow nozzles of reactors or fusion coverters in the pyrometallurgy and mining industry using the injection of discrete air impacts, regulated to high pressure and rate, through the enriched air blow nozzles in reactors or pyrometallurgical converters.
The method involves the injection of high pressure and rate air impacts through a nozzle (1) using a system formed by an accumulator (2) that stores the compressed air to be injected in the form of impacts through the nozzle (1). The compressed air is stored in the accumulator (2) at a pressure between 70 and 100 psi (4.82 and 6.89 bar). For such an effect, the accumulator (2) has a capacity ranging between 40 and 60 liters of air, which will depend of the pressure desired for the impact. The following table observes the pressure associated with volume in order to achieve this pressure:
Over the accumulator a piston valve (3) added intended to evacuate, in a split second, preferentially 0.09 s, all the air contained in the accumulator (2). The valve (3) in turn is connected from one of its sides to the lower part of the tube which is part of the nozzle (1). This connection is performed through the tube (4) which has a diameter equal or lesser than that of the tube which is part of the nozzle (1). Therefore, when the air contained in the accumulator (2) is released by the activation of the valve (3), the compressed air enters directly to the nozzle (1) at the same pressure which it was released from the accumulator, i.e., between 4.82 and 6.89 bar. From the
When the air impact is injected from the accumulator (2), two effects or physical phenomena occur: the Venturi effect and the Coanda effect. The first sets that the air impact pulls the enriched air to normal pressure, i.e., produces suction of the enriched air, helping it flow towards the inside of reactor. The second effect causes the flow of the high pressure air impact to remain in the direction of the flow and close to the lower part of the wall of nozzle (1) tube. This effect produces breaking of the obstructive accretion (7) deposited in the lower part of the nozzle, at the entrance of reactor. Accordingly, these principles inhibit the production of an obstructive accretion, allowing a continuous flow of enriched air towards the inside of the melting bath.
On the other hand, the connection angle (α) between the tube (4) and the nozzle (1) ranges from 140° to 160°, preferentially 1500. This angle (α) allows the air to run effectively through the nozzle (1) and not hit on the wall of it.
The piston valve (3) is commanded by a solenoid 12 (
Alternatively, the system can have a flow measure device in the nozzle (1) in order to perform the air impact when the order from an actuator is received, e.g., a PCL, depending from the measure device, for releasing its contents when the normal air flow which should circulate for the nozzle decreases respect to a pre-established value. The measure device should be preferentially an optical sensor 15 (
When the air impact is performed through the nozzle, the effect of the rate is extremely relevant because such a rate, associated with the pressure of the air, will define the penetration length of the air in the inside wall of the converter, from the inside end (8) of nozzle (1) to the melting bath. However, this will depend on the density of gas respect to the melting liquid and, in turn, to the Froude number, which is the travel that the gas makes into the liquid forming the melting bath.
According to an empirical relation for converters, developed by Hoefele and Brimacombe in 1994, the penetration of a gas in a liquid is given by the following equation:
ρg: gas density
ρl: liquid density
dt: nozzle diameter
In turn, the Froude number, Fr, is defined as follows:
, where Vg: gas rate at the exit of nozzle.
This means that the air impact which enters into the melting bath will produce a cooling of the melting bath in the extent of its penetration, beginning the formation of the directed accretion (9), as shown in the
The natural lengthening of the tube which is part of the nozzle (1), produced by the directed accretion (9), results in the enriched air which is blown by the nozzle (1) entering deeper into the melting bath, traveling a distance that ranges between 11 and 22 cm, approximately. Because of this distance of penetration, the enriched air penetrates to a longer distance from the reactor or converter wall and, consequently, to a longer distance from the refractory material, in a zone where the bath surge already exists, preventing the occurrence of obstructive accretions (7) since the very surge will tend to eliminate them. Therefore, a combination between the surge and the high pressure and rate air impact is produced.
As was already shown, the rate associated to the pressure has a basic role in the formation of the directed accretion. This rate ranges from 263 to 328 m/s at the exit of the piston valve (3) when the air impact is produced, and arrives to the nozzle (1) with a rate which ranges from 195 to 300 m/s.
The examples presented below show the results obtained with the application of the air impact and its incidence in the distance of penetration into the bath.
Calculation of the Froude number for the different operation states:
The calculation of Froude number is performed from the density ratios
Diameter of entrance de=0.116 m Diameter in the linking pipe from Tube (4) to Nozzle (1) Inner diameter Nozzle d, =0.059 m. Inner diameter of nozzle.
Calculation of the exit rate in normal regime to 20 psi (1.38 bar):
With the following parameters of a CPS converter:
Calculation of the Froude number for the normal state:
Therefore, the travel of the air in the bath is:
xc=54.1 58.6 mm Travel of the air in the bath, in mm.
Calculation of the exit rate with the air impact system using a pressure of 80 psi (5.52 bar)
Rate in the system c=263,137 m/s Rate in the exit of the air impact system Rate in the nozzle tube Vg=195,076 m/s Rate in the exit of the nozzle tube
Calculation of the Froude number for the state with the air impact system:
Therefore, the values of the empirical ratio for the air penetration are
xc/dt=2.01 2.18 Empirical ratio for the air penetration into the liquid
Therefore, the travel of the air in the bath is equal to:
xc=118.6 128.4 Travel of the air in the bath, in mm.
Calculation of the exit rate with the air tube using a pressure of 100 psi (6.89 bar)
Rate in the system c=328,921 m/s Rate in the exit of the air impact system Rate in the nozzle tube Vg=243,846 m/s Rate in the exit of the nozzle tube
Calculation of the Froude number for the state with the air impact system:
Therefore, the values of the empirical ratio for the air penetration are:
xc/dt=3.25 3.52 Empirical ratio for the air penetration into the liquid
Therefore, the travel of the air in the bath is equal to:
xc=191.8 207.6 Travel of the air in the bath, in mm.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1694218 | Hazard | Dec 1928 | A |
2480394 | Cavers et al. | Aug 1949 | A |
2696979 | Berge | Dec 1954 | A |
3722814 | Miyashita | Mar 1973 | A |
4051982 | Stetson | Oct 1977 | A |
4077747 | Burenga | Mar 1978 | A |
4346822 | Wadensten et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4449644 | Matson | May 1984 | A |
4989839 | Simms et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5123632 | Schmit et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5254144 | Provol | Oct 1993 | A |
5332419 | Lemay et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5397108 | Alexander et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5462605 | Szucs | Oct 1995 | A |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060226254 A1 | Oct 2006 | US |