1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to communications in computer networks. In particular, the invention relates to ranging methods in a data-over-cable system.
2. Description of the Related Art
Cable television networks such as those provided by Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., of Philadelphia, Pa., Cox Communications of Atlanta, Ga., Tele-Communications, Inc., of Englewood Colo., Time-Warner Cable, of Marietta Ga., Continental Cablevision, Inc., of Boston Mass., and others provide cable television services to a large number of subscribers over a large geographical area. The cable television networks typically are interconnected by cables such as coaxial cables or a Hybrid Fiber/Coaxial (“HFC”) cable system which have data rates of about 10 Mega-bits-per-second (“Mbps”) to about 30+ Mbps.
The Internet, a world-wide network of interconnected computers, provides multi-media content including audio, video, graphics and text that typically requires a large bandwidth for downloading and viewing. Most Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) allow customers to connect to the Internet via a serial telephone line from a Public Switched Telephone Network (“PSTN”) at data rates including 14,400 bps, 28,800 bps, 33,600 bps, 56,000 bps and others that are much slower than the about 10 Mbps to about 30+Mbps available on a coaxial cable or HFC cable system on a cable television network.
With the explosive growth of the Internet, many customers have desired to use the larger bandwidth of a cable television network to connect to the Internet and other computer networks. Cable modems, such as those provided by 3Com Corporation, of Santa Clara, Calif., Motorola Corporation, of Arlington Heights, Ill., Hewlett-Packard Co., of Palo Alto, Calif., Bay Networks, of Santa Clara, Calif., Scientific-Atlanta, of Norcross, Ga., General Instruments, of Horsham, Pa., and others offer customers higher-speed connectivity to the Internet, an intranet, Local Area Networks (“LANs”) and other computer networks via cable television networks. These cable modems currently support a data connection to the Internet and other computer networks via a cable television network with a data rate of up to about 30+ Mbps, which is a much larger data rate than can be supported by a modem used over a serial telephone line.
Many cable television networks, however, provide only uni-directional cable systems, supporting only a “downstream” cable data path. A downstream data path is the flow of data to a customer from a cable system “headend”—a central location in the cable television network that is responsible for sending cable signals in the downstream direction. Traditionally, cable television networks provided one-way cable systems with a return “upstream” data path via a telephone network (i.e., a “telephony return”), such as a public switched telephone network provided by AT&T, GTE, Sprint, MCI and others. An upstream data path is the flow of data from the customer back to the cable system headend. A cable television system with an upstream connection to a telephony network is called a “data-over-cable system with telephony return.”
As the cable television network has developed, two-way cable systems without telephony returns, wherein both downstream and upstream flow occur on the cable network, have become increasingly prevalent. In a two-way cable system, customer premise equipment sends response data packets to the cable modem, which sends the data packets upstream via the cable television network to the cable modem termination system. The cable modem termination system sends the data packets to appropriate hosts on the data network and sends the response data packets back to the appropriate cable modem.
As a cable modem is initialized in a data-over-cable system, it registers with a cable modem termination system to allow the cable modem to receive data over a cable television connection from a data network (e.g., the Internet, a WAN or a LAN). The cable modem forwards configuration information it receives in a configuration file during initialization to the cable modem termination system as part of a registration request message. A cable modem also helps initialize and register any attached customer premise equipment with the cable modem termination system.
When a cable modem initializes on a cable television network, it uses a ranging process to determine the appropriate transmission parameters for its data transfer For a description of the ranging process, see DOCSIS Radio Frequency Interface Specification SP-RFIv1.1-I03-991105 (hereinafter “DOCSIS RFI Spec 1.1”), which is incorporated herein by reference. Under existing ranging procedures, the cable modem sends a ranging message at an initial maintenance opportunity. The initial maintenance opportunity is a contention opportunity under existing standards, and thus any cable modem attached to the network may be attempting to use the same opportunity. If two or more cable modems attempt to use the same initial maintenance opportunity, a collision occurs and the cable modem termination system does not receive any of the ranging messages. When the cable modems fail to receive a response from the cable modem termination system, the modems determine a random “backoff period” that the modem will wait before attempting to resend the ranging request.
As the number of cable modems using cable networks increases, this method will become increasingly inefficient. In order to accommodate a larger number of modems on the network, the modems may need to use larger backoff periods. Moreover, there is no gaurantee that another collision will not occur when the modem again transmits its ranging request. These limitations will lead to an increased number of ranging attempts that a cable modem must perform before accessing the cable modem termination system. The effects of these limitations will be especially pronounced when a downstream channel fails, and all the cable modems previously using that channel must re-initialize on another channel or on the same channel after it comes back online.
There is therefore a need in the art for an improved method of ranging.
In a first aspect, the invention provides a controlled, deterministic method of preventing collisions when a cable modem registers with a cable modem termination system on a cable television network following failure of a primary communications channel between the cable modem and the cable modem termination system. The method provides a service identifier that is transmitted to the cable modem during initial registration of the cable modem with the cable modem termination system. Upon registration of the cable modem with the cable modem termination system, the cable modem stores the service identifier in memory. After failure of the primary channel, the cable modem reinitializes on the cable network and waits for transmission of a bandwidth allocation map from the cable modem termination system. When the cable modem receives the bandwidth allocation map, it determines if the map contains an initial maintenance opportunity having a unicast, broadcast or multicast associated identifier, or a combination thereof. If the map contains an initial maintenance opportunity having a unicast associated identifier, the cable modem compares the service identifier stored in its memory with the unicast associated identifier for the initial maintenance opportunity information element of the bandwidth allocation map. If the service identifiers match, the cable modem uses the initial maintenance opportunity having a unicast associated identifier contained in the information element of the bandwidth allocation map to range on the network. If the cable modem determines that the bandwidth allocation map does not contain a initial maintenance opportunity having a unicast associated identifier, the cable modem uses standard contention ranging with an initial maintenance opportunity having a broadcast or multicast associated identifier in the bandwidth allocation map to range on the network. If the cable modem determines that the bandwidth allocation map does contain a initial maintenance opportunity having a unicast associated identifier, but the service identifiers do not match, the cable modem uses standard contention ranging with an initial maintenance opportunity having a broadcast or multicast associated identifier in the bandwidth allocation map.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the bandwidth allocation map contains a plurality of initial maintenance opportunities having associated identifiers, wherein the associated identifiers are broadcast, multicast or unicast. In a further preferred embodiment, the cable modem reads only the first of the plurality of initial maintenance opportunities in the bandwidth allocation map. If the associated identifier for the initial maintenance opportunity is unicast and corresponds to the service identifier in the cable modem, the cable modem ranges on the network using non-contention ranging, otherwise the cable modem uses standard contention ranging.
In a further preferred embodiment, the cable modem reads all of the initial maintenance opportunities in the bandwidth allocation map prior to ranging on the cable television network. If any of the initial maintenance opportunities has a unicast associated identifier corresponding to the service identifier stored in the cable modem, the cable modem uses that initial maintenance opportunity having a unicast associated identifier to range on the cable television network. Otherwise, the cable modem uses an initial maintenance opportunity having a broadcast or multicast associated identifier in the bandwidth allocation map to range on the cable television network.
The foregoing and other aspects and advantages of illustrative embodiments of the present invention will be more readily apparent from the following detailed description, which proceeds with references to the accompanying drawings.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the following drawings, wherein:
Exemplary Data-Over-Cable System
In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the CMTS 12 is a Total Control hub by 3Com Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif., with a cable modem termination unit. A Total Control hub is a chassis with multiple networking cards connected by a common bus. An exemplary Total Control hub is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,528,595, granted to Dale M. Walsh et al., and is incorporated herein by reference. However, CMTS 12 could also be another network server including those by Lucent Technologies of Murray Hill, N.J., Livingston Enterprises, Inc. of Pleasanton, Calif., Ascend Communications of Alameda, Calif., Cisco Systems, Inc., of San Jose, Calif. and others.
The cable network 14 includes cable television networks such as those provided by Comcast Cable Communications, Inc., of Philadelphia, Pa., Cox Communications, or Atlanta, Ga., Tele-Communications, Inc., of Englewood Colo., Time-Warner Cable, of Marietta, Ga., Continental Cablevision, Inc., of Boston, Mass., and others. As noted above, the cable network 14 is connected to the Cable Modem (“CM”) 16 over a bi-directional cable connection. CM 16 may be any commercially available cable modem such as those provided by 3Com Corporation of Santa Clara, Calif., Motorola Corporation of Arlington Heights, Ill., Hewlett-Packard Co. of Palo Alto, Calif., Bay Networks of Santa Clara, Calif., Scientific-Atlanta, of Norcross, Ga., General Instruments of Horsham, Pa., and others.
The CMTS 12 is located at a “headend” 26 of the cable system 10. Content servers, operations servers, administrative servers and maintenance servers used in data-over-cable system 10 (not shown in
The CMTS 12 is connected to a data network 28 by a CMTS-Network System Interface (“CMTS-NSI”) 32. The preferred embodiments are, however, not limited to the architecture of the data-over-cable system 10 illustrated in
Network Device Protocol Stack
For downstream data transmission, network devices, including for example the CM 16, are connected to the cable network 14 in a physical layer 38 via a Radio Frequency (“RF”) Interface 40. The RF interface 40 and the MAC layer 44 are used for an upstream cable connection in a data-over-cable system 10 without telephony return. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the RF Interface 40 has an operation frequency range of 50 megahertz (“MHz”) to 1 gigahertz (“GHz”) and a channel bandwidth of 6 MHz. However, other frequency ranges may alternatively be used.
The RF interface 40 uses a signal modulation method, such as Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (“QAM”). As is known in the art, QAM is used as a means of encoding digital information over radio, wire, or fiber optic transmission links. QAM is a combination of amplitude and phase modulation and is an extension of multiphase phase-shift-keying. QAM can have any number of discrete digital levels typically including 4, 16, 64 or 256 levels In one embodiment of the present invention, QAM-64 is used in the RF interface 40. However, other operating frequencies and modulation methods may alternatively be used, including for example, Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (“QPSK”) modulation). The RF interface 40 is preferably compliant with the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (“IEEE”) standard 802.14 for cable modems, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. IEEE standards can be found on the World Wide Web at the URL “www.ieee.org.” Other RF interfaces 40 may alternatively be used, including, for example, RF interfaces from MCNS.
Above the RF interface 40 in the protocol stack 36 a transmission convergence sublayer 41, which is only present in the downstream direction. Transmission convergence sublayer 41 provides for the transmission of services such as digital video over the physical layer 38 bitstream. For more information on transmission convergence sublayer 41, reference may be made to DOCSIS Radio Frequency Interface Specification SP-RFIv1.1-I03-991105 (hereinafter “DOCSIS RFI Spec 1.1”), the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Above the RF interface 40 in the upstream direction, and transmission convergence sublayer 41 in the downstream direction, is a data-link layer 42. Data-link layer comprises a Medium Access Control (“MAC”) layer 44, a link security layer 46, and a logical link control (“LLC”) layer 48. As is known in the art, the MAC layer 44 controls access to a transmission medium via physical layer 38. For more information on the MAC layer protocol 44, reference may be made to IEEE 802.14 for cable modems. However, other MAC layer protocols 44 may alternatively be used, including, for example, MCNS MAC layer protocols. Above the MAC layer 44 is an optional link security protocol stack 46. Link security protocol stack 46 prevents unauthorized users from making a data connection from the cable network 14. Above the link security protocol stack 46 is LLC layer 48. For more information on LLC layer 48, reference may be made to ISO/IEC 10039, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Above both the downstream and upstream data-link layers 42, in a network layer 52, is an Internet Protocol (“IP”) layer 54. IP layer 54, hereinafter IP 54, roughly corresponds to OSI layer 3, the network layer, but is typically not defined as part of the OSI model. As is known in the art, IP 54 is a routing protocol designed to route traffic within a network or between networks. For more information on IP 54, reference may be made to RFC-791, J. Postel, Internet Protocol, Sep. 1, 1981, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Internet Control Message Protocol (“ICMP”) layer 56 is used for network management. The main functions of ICMP layer 56, hereinafter ICMP 56, include error reporting, reachability testing (e.g., “pinging”), congestion control, route-change notification, performance, subnet addressing and others. Because IP 54 is an unacknowledged protocol, datagrams may be discarded and ICMP 56 is used for error reporting. For more information on ICMP 56, reference may be made to RFC-792, J. Postel, Internet Control Message Protocol, Sep. 1, 1981, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Above IP 54 and ICMP 56 is a transport layer 58 with a User Datagram Protocol (“UDP”) layer 60. UDP layer 60, hereinafter UDP 60, roughly corresponds to OSI layer 4, the transport layer, but is typically not defined as part of the OSI model. As is known in the art, UDP 60 provides a connectionless mode of communications with datagrams. For more information on UDP 60 reference may be made to RFC-768, J. Postel, User Datagram Protocol, Aug. 28, 1990, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference Transmission Control Protocol (“TCP”) may also be used in the transport layer 58. For more information on TCP, reference may be made to RFC-793, J. Postel, Transmission Control Protocol, Sep. 1, 1981, the contents of which are incorporated by reference.
Above the network layer are a Simple Network Management Protocol (“SNMP”) layer 62, Trivial File Transfer Protocol (“TFTP”) layer 64, and Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (“DHCP”) layer 66. SNMP layer 62 is used to support network management functions. For more information on SNMP layer 62, reference may be made to the contents of which are RFC-1157, J. D. Case et al., Simple Network Management Protocol, May 1, 1990, incorporated herein by reference. TFTP layer 64 is a file transfer protocol used to download files and configuration information. For more information on TFTP layer 64, reference may be made to RFC-1350, K. Sollins, The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2), July 1992, the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. DHCP layer 66 is a protocol for passing configuration information to hosts on an IP 54 network. For more information on DHCP layer 66, see RFC-2131, R. Droms, Dynamic Host Control Protocol, March 1997, and RFC-2132, S. Alexander and R. Droms, DHCP Options and BOOTP Vendor Extensions, March 1997, the contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The CM 16 supports transmission and reception of IP 54 datagrams as specified for example by RFC-791. The CMTS 12 may also perform filtering of IP 54 datagrams. The CM 16 is also preferably configurable for IP 54 datagram filtering to restrict the CM 16 and the CPE 18 to the use of only their assigned IP 54 addresses. The CM 16 is preferably configurable for IP 54 datagram UDP 60 port filtering (i.e., deep filtering).
The CM 16 forwards IP 54 datagrams destined to an IP 54 unicast address across the cable network 14. Some routers have security features intended to filter out invalid users who alter or masquerade packets as if sent from a valid user. Since routing policy is under the control of network operators, such filtering is a vendor specific implementation. The CM 16 also forwards IP 54 datagrams destined to an IP 54 multicast address across the cable network 14. The CM 16 is preferably configurable to keep IP 54 multicast routing tables and to use group membership protocols.
An operating environment for the CMTS 12, the CM 16, the CPE 18, and other network devices includes a processing system with at least one high speed Central Processing Unit (“CPU”) and a memory system. In accordance with the practices of persons skilled in the art of computer programming, the present invention is described below with reference to acts and symbolic representations of operations or instructions that are performed by the processing system, unless indicated otherwise. Such acts and operations or instructions are sometimes referred to as being “computer-executed,” or “CPU executed.”
It will be appreciated that the acts and symbolically represented operations or instructions include the manipulation of electrical signals by the CPU. The memory locations where data are maintained are physical locations that have particular electrical, magnetic, optical, or organic properties corresponding to the data bits. The data may also be maintained on a computer readable medium including magnetic disks, optical disks, organic disks, and any other volatile or non-volatile mass storage system readable by the CPU. The computer readable medium may include cooperating or interconnected computer readable media, which exist exclusively on the processing system or distributed among multiple interconnected processing systems that may be local or remote to the processing system.
Initialization of a Cable Modem
When the CM 16 is initially powered on, the CM 16 scans for a valid available downstream channel. Once the CM 16 has acquired a valid downstream channel, the CM 16 waits for an Upstream Channel Descriptor (“UCD”) from the CMTS 12. The UCD is used to provide transmission parameters for all available upstream channels. Information in the UCD is used by the CM 16 to determine whether the CM 16 can use the given upstream channel. The UCD is transmitted by the CMTS 12 as a MAC management message at a periodic opportunity (e.g., every 2 seconds). To provide for flexibility, the UCD message parameters are encoded in a Type/Length/Value (“TLV”) form.
Non-Contention Ranging
Once the CM 16 has acquired valid downstream and upstream channels, the CM 16 begins the ranging process. The CM 16 waits for transmission of a bandwidth allocation map (“MAP”) 100 associated with the upstream channel from the CMTS 12. The MAP 100 is in the form of a MAC management message and contains information used by the CM 16 to determine the timing of its transmissions back to the CMTS 12.
As illustrated in
MAP IEs 124 are each four bytes. A series of MAP IEs 124 is illustrated in
For non-contention ranging, the CMTS 12 uses unicast SIDs 126 in MAP IEs 124 for initial ranging. Under DOCSIS RFI Spec. 1.1, SIDs 126 for initial maintenance opportunities are broadcast or multicast. The preferred embodiments provide for the introduction of a initial maintenance opportunity having a unicast associated identifier SID 126, wherein the unicast SID 126 is used by the CM 16 to range on the cable television network following failure of a primary channel between the CM 16 and the CMTS 12.
In a preferred embodiment, the CMTS 12 maintains a pool of unicast SIDs 126 and a pool of broadcast or multicast SIDs 126. Using the known pool of unicast SIDs 126, the CMTS 12 sequentially schedules initial maintenance opportunities for the CMs 16. This method requires that each CM 16 have a unique SID 126, which the CM 16 obtains upon registration with the CMTS 12, and therefore the method is used primarily for reinitializing a pool of modems after a channel failure. Initial registration of the CM 16 with the CMTS 12 uses standard contention ranging procedures as described in DOCSIS RFI Spec 1.1. After initial registration with the CMTS 12, the CM 16 stores the unique SID 126 received from the CMTS 12 for use in non-contention ranging. In a preferred embodiment, the SID 126 is stored in a volatile memory component in the CM 16.
A preferred method for of non-contention ranging is illustrated in
Following the channel failure, the CM 16 determines, at step 240, that its timeout has been exceeded, and therefore that the channel has failed. The CM 16 proceeds to, stores the permanent SID 126 at step 250, reinitializes on the network and enters a waiting state at step 270. When the CM 16 receives MAP 100 at step 280, it proceeds to determine at step 290 whether the SID 126 in the MAP 100 is a unicast SID or a broadcast/multicast SID. In another embodiment, the CM 16 examines the IEs 124 in the MAP 100 sequentially and takes the first initial maintenance opportunity available, whether the opportunity contains a broadcast, multicast or unicast associated SID 126. In a further preferred embodiment, CM 16 reads all IEs 124 in MAP 100 to determine if one of the IEs 124 is directed to the last known unicast SID 126 of the CM 16. If the appropriate unicast SID 126 appears in the MAP 100 at step 300, the CM 16 proceeds to step 310, where it bypasses the backoff parameters contained in MAP 100, at steps 320 and 330, and attempts to range on the cable television network using the unicast SID 126 and the last known transmission parameters associated with that unicast SID 126. If the CM 16 determines at step 290 that the appropriate unicast SID 126 is not in the MAP 100, the CM 16 proceeds to step 340 and uses a broadcast or multicast SID in the MAP 100 and standard contention ranging to range on the cable television network.
It should be understood that the programs, processes, methods and apparatus described herein are not related or limited to any particular type of computer or network apparatus (hardware or software), unless indicated otherwise. Various types of general purpose or specialized computer apparatus may be used with or perform operations in accordance with the teachings described herein.
In view of the wide variety of embodiments to which the principles of the present invention can be applied, it should be understood that the illustrated embodiments are exemplary only, and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present invention. For example, the steps of the flow diagrams may be taken in sequences other than those described, and more or fewer elements may be used in the block diagrams. The claims should not be read as limited to the described order or elements unless stated to that effect. Therefore, all embodiments that come within the scope and spirit of the following claims and equivalents thereto are claimed as the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4644533 | Braff et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4881263 | Herbison et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4996685 | Farese et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5014234 | Edwards, Jr. | May 1991 | A |
5138712 | Corbin | Aug 1992 | A |
5301273 | Konishi | Apr 1994 | A |
5347304 | Moura et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5430727 | Callon | Jul 1995 | A |
5442749 | Northcutt et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5488412 | Majeti et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489897 | Inoue | Feb 1996 | A |
5528595 | Walsh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5583931 | Schneider et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586121 | Moura et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5598410 | Stone | Jan 1997 | A |
5600717 | Schneider et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5606606 | Schneider et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5608446 | Carr et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5610910 | Focsaneanu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5623542 | Schneider et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623601 | Vu | Apr 1997 | A |
5636211 | Newlin | Jun 1997 | A |
5675732 | Majeti et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675742 | Jain et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5678041 | Baker et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708654 | Arndt et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710885 | Bondi | Jan 1998 | A |
5724510 | Arndt et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5761602 | Wagner et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778181 | Hidary et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784597 | Chiu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790198 | Roop et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790548 | Sistanizadeh et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790677 | Fox et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790770 | McClure et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790806 | Koperda | Aug 1998 | A |
5793747 | Kline | Aug 1998 | A |
5799086 | Sudia | Aug 1998 | A |
5805804 | Laursen et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809252 | Beighe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812819 | Rodwin et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815664 | Asano | Sep 1998 | A |
5818845 | Moura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819028 | Manghirmalani et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819042 | Hansen | Oct 1998 | A |
5828655 | Moura et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828666 | Focsaneanu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835720 | Nelson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835727 | Wong et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841777 | Cohen | Nov 1998 | A |
5848233 | Radia et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852721 | Dillon et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854901 | Cole et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859852 | Moura et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864679 | Kanai et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5870134 | Laubach et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872523 | Dellaverson et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884024 | Lim et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892754 | Kompella et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894479 | Mohammed | Apr 1999 | A |
5903558 | Jones et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909549 | Compliment et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5913037 | Spofford et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915119 | Cone | Jun 1999 | A |
5922049 | Radia et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5922051 | Sidey | Jul 1999 | A |
5923659 | Curry et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926458 | Yin | Jul 1999 | A |
5929850 | Broadwin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5941988 | Bhagwat et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943604 | Chen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954797 | Sidey | Sep 1999 | A |
5958007 | Lee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960177 | Tanno | Sep 1999 | A |
5974453 | Andersen et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982748 | Yin et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987524 | Yoshida et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991292 | Focsaneanu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991306 | Burns et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996076 | Rowney et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999536 | Kawafuji et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6003077 | Bawden et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005851 | Craddock et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006264 | Colby et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009103 | Woundy | Dec 1999 | A |
6012088 | Li et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013107 | Blackshear et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014545 | Wu et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018767 | Fijolek et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6031841 | Woundy | Feb 2000 | A |
6032019 | Chen et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041041 | Ramanathan et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046979 | Bauman | Apr 2000 | A |
6049546 | Ramakrishnan | Apr 2000 | A |
6049825 | Yamamoto | Apr 2000 | A |
6049826 | Beser | Apr 2000 | A |
6052724 | Willie et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6058421 | Fijolek et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061349 | Coile et al. | May 2000 | A |
6064372 | Kahkoska | May 2000 | A |
6065049 | Beser | May 2000 | A |
6070187 | Subramaniam et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070242 | Wong et al. | May 2000 | A |
6070246 | Beser | May 2000 | A |
6073178 | Wong et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075787 | Bobeck et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6091709 | Harrison et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094431 | Yamato et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6104700 | Haddock et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112258 | Miller et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114968 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122254 | Aydemir et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6128298 | Wootton et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130879 | Liu | Oct 2000 | A |
6130880 | Naudus et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137792 | Jonas et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6137793 | Gorman et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148410 | Baskey et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157965 | Mohammed et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6170061 | Beser | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178455 | Schutte et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6185624 | Fijolek et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189102 | Beser | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6208656 | Hrastar et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212563 | Beser | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216171 | Isono et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223222 | Fijolek et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230326 | Unger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240464 | Fijolek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243369 | Grimwood et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260072 | Rodriguez-Moral | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269099 | Borella et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272150 | Hrastar | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6275853 | Beser et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289377 | Lalwaney et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6295554 | Karadogan | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301223 | Hrastar et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6301618 | Sitaraman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308328 | Bowcutt et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331987 | Beser | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332163 | Bowman-Amuah | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6337858 | Petty et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351773 | Fijolek et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370147 | Beser | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6393478 | Bahlmann | May 2002 | B1 |
6442158 | Beser | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449291 | Burns et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453472 | Leano et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490727 | Nazarathy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510162 | Fijolek et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6546017 | Khaunte | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6588016 | Chen et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6742186 | Roeck | May 2004 | B1 |
20010055319 | Quigley et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020122050 | Sandberg | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136165 | Ady et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030028891 | Hardt et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 0067385 | Nov 2000 | WO |