This invention relates to a method and system for monitoring commercial electronic transactions, and methods for estimating the probability that a pending electronic transaction is fraudulent.
The invention relates to a method and system for authenticating internet user identity, and more particularly, to a method and system for authenticating internet user identity by cross-referencing the geographical location of a internet user's Communication voice device, such as a mobile voice device, a Voice over Internet Protocol (hereinafter VoIP) telephone or non-mobile telephone, and the location of a client Internet Protocol (hereinafter IP address).
The use of the internet has become a common a popular arena for the sale of goods and services. Such sales require the transmission of personal and confidential data belonging to the buyer of such goods and services. Such information is often the target of identity theft. In response to the increase in the opportunity for the commission of fraud through identity theft, sellers and providers of goods and services through the internet require a method whereby such fraud can be reduced.
With respect to internet usage, upon accessing the internet, an internet user's computer is identified with an IP address, it should be understood that IP Address means any internet communication protocol such as but not limited to IPV4 and IPV6. And whenever the internet user enters a website, the internet user's IP address is identified to the website owner. Such identified IP addresses can be traceable geographically to its source so as to determine the location (state and city) of the internet user, in some cases the IP address can be traced to a radius of a few miles from its source. The comparison of the geographical location of the internet user IP address, with the geographical location of said internet user Communication voice device can provide the seller or provider a means to authenticate the identify of the internet user.
U.S. patent application Pub. No. 2001/0034718 A1 to Shaked et al. discloses a method of controlling access to a service over a network, including the steps of automatically identifying a service user and acquiring user information, thereby to control access. Additionally, a method of providing service over a network, in which the service requires identification of a user, including the steps of automatically identifying the user and associating the user with user information, thus enabling the service, is disclosed.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,466,779 to Moles et al. discloses a security apparatus for use in a wireless network including base stations communicating with mobile stations for preventing unprovisioned mobile stations from accessing an internet protocol (IP) data network via the wireless network.
U.S. patent application Pub. No. 2002/0188712 A1 to Caslin et al. discloses a fraud monitoring system for a communications system. The fraud monitoring system analyzes records of usage activity in the system and applies fraud pattern detection algorithms to detect patterns indicative of fraud. The fraud monitoring system accommodates both transaction records resulting from control of a packet-switched network and those from a circuit-switched network gateway
U.S. patent application Pub. No. 2003/0056096 A1 to Albert et al. discloses a method to securely authenticate user credentials. The method includes encrypting a user credential with a public key at an access device. The public key is part of a public/private key pair suitable for use with encryption algorithm. The decrypted user credential is then transmitted from the decryption server to an authentication server for verification. The decryption server typically forms part of a multi-party service access environment including a plurality of access providers. This method can be used in legacy protocols, such as Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP), Password Authentication Protocol (PAP), Challenge-Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP), Remote Authentication Dial in User Server (RADIUS) protocol, Terminal Access Controller Access Control System (TACAS) protocol, Lightweight. Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), NT Domain authentication protocol, Unix password authentication protocol, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), Hypertext Transfer Protocol over Secure sockets layer (HTTPS), Extended Authentication Protocol (EAP), Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol, Token Ring protocol, and/or Secure Remote Password protocol (SRP).
U.S. patent application Publication Number US 2003/0101134 A1 published to Liu et al. on May 29, 2003 teaches a method for transaction approval, including submitting a transaction approval request from a transaction site to a clearing agency; submitting a user authorization request from the clearing agency to a user device; receiving a response to the user authorization request; and sending a response to the transaction approval request from the clearing agency to the transaction site. Another method for transaction approval includes: submitting a transaction approval request from a transaction site to a clearing agency; determining whether a trusted transaction is elected; submitting a user authorization request from the clearing agency to a user device if a trusted transaction is determined to be elected; receiving a response to the user authorization request from the user device if the user authentication request was submitted; and sending a response to the transaction approval request from the clearing agency to the transaction site. A system for transaction approval includes a clearing agency for the transaction approval wherein the clearing agency having a function to request for user authorization, a network operatively coupled to the clearing agency, and a user device adapted to be operatively coupled to the network for trusted transaction approval.
U.S. patent application Publication Number US 2003/0187800 A1 published to Moore et al. on Oct. 2, 2003 teaches systems, methods, and program products for determining billable usage of a communications system wherein services are provided via instant communications. In some embodiments, there is provided for authorizing the fulfillment of service requests based upon information pertaining to a billable account.
U.S. patent application Publication Number US 2004/0111640 A1 published to Baum on Jun. 10, 2004 teaches methods and apparatus for determining, in a reliable manner, a port, physical location, and/or device identifier, such as a MAC address, associated with a device using an IP address and for using such information, e.g., to support one or more security applications. Supported security applications include restricting access to services based on the location of a device seeking access to a service, determining the location of stolen devices, and authenticating the location of the source of a message or other IP signal, e.g., to determine if a prisoner is contacting a monitoring service from a predetermined location.
U.S. patent application Publication Number US 2005/0159173 A1 published to Dowling on Jul. 21, 2005 teaches methods, apparatus, and business techniques for use in mobile network communication systems. A mobile unit, such as a smart phone, is preferably equipped with a wireless local area network connection and a wireless wide area network connection. The local area network connection is used to establish a position-dependent, e-commerce network connection with a wireless peripheral supplied by a vendor. The mobile unit is then temporarily augmented with the added peripheral services supplied by the negotiated wireless peripheral. Systems and methods allow the mobile unit to communicate securely with a remote server, even when the negotiated wireless peripheral is not fully trusted. Also included are mobile units, wireless user peripherals, and negotiated wireless peripherals projecting a non-area constrained user interface image on a display surface.
U.S. patent application Publication Number US 2005/0160280 A1 published to Caslin et al. on Jul. 21, 2005 teaches providing fraud detection in support of data communication services. A usage pattern associated with a particular account for remote access to a data network is monitored. The usage pattern is compared with a reference pattern specified for the account. A fraud alert is selectively generated based on the comparison.
U.S. patent application Publication Number US 2005/0180395 A1 published to Moore et al. on Aug. 18, 2005 teaches an approach for supporting a plurality of communication modes through universal identification. A core identifier is generated for uniquely identifying a user among a plurality of users within the communication system. One or more specific identifiers are derived based upon the core identifier. The specific identifiers serve as addressing information to the respective communication modes. The specific identifiers and the core identifier are designated as a suite of identifiers allocated to the user.
While these systems may be suitable for the particular purpose employed, or for general use, they would not be as suitable for the purposes of the present invention as disclosed hereafter.
It is an object of the invention to produce a means to decrease the potential for fraud through authentication of the identity of an internet user. Accordingly, this method provides for authenticating the identity of the internet user or purchaser (hereinafter “internet user”) through cross-referencing and comparison of at least two independent sources of information, such as, but not limited to, the IP address of the internet user's computer, geographical location of the internet user, router geographical location or the geographical location of number of a Communication voice device associated with said internet user.
It is another object of the invention to provide a means for providing an accurate geographical location of the internet user and the internet user's IP address. Accordingly, this method includes identifying the IP address and tracing it geographically using any one of the existing software programs that can trace IP addresses.
It is another object of the invention to provide a convenient means for determining the location of internet users at both mobile and non-mobile Communication voice devices and terminals. Accordingly, this method includes the utilization systems and software that are used to locate the geographical location of people or Communication voice devices, such as, but not limited to Global Positioning Systems (GPS), Galileo, WiMax, Wi-Fi, RFID and external positioning apparatus, such as, but not limited to, cellular base stations and antennas.
It is another object of the invention to provide a convenient means for determining a more accurate geographical location of routers using the internet user Communication voice device's geographical location and the said user IP address.
This invention is a method and system for authenticating an internet user identity by cross-referencing and comparing at least two independent sources of information. A first IP address of an internet user is identified. The geographical location of the IP address is traced geographically to determine a first location. The geographical address of a communications device of said internet user is traced to determine a second location. The first and second locations are compared for geographical proximity to confirm the identity of the internet user. Additionally, depending on the geographical proximity of the first and second location, a positive or negative score may be assigned to the internet user, and access to the website and the ability to conduct transactions may be allowed or limited based on the assigned score. Alternatively, additional authentication information may be required of the internet user in order to proceed with the online transaction, or access by the internet user may be terminated.
To the accomplishment of the above and related objects the invention may be embodied in the form illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Attention is called to the fact, however, that the drawings are illustrative only. Variations are contemplated as being part of the invention, limited only by the scope of the claims.
In the drawings, like elements are depicted by like reference numerals. The drawings are briefly described as follows.
This invention relates to a method and system for authenticating internet user identity by cross-referencing or comparing at least two independent sources of information, identifying at least two geographical locations. Based upon geographical proximity of said locations, a score is assigned to the internet user, and predetermined access to a website and an ability to conduct transactions is allowed or limited based upon said score. Alternatively, additional authentication information can be required or access can be terminated. The invention is also a convenient means for determining a more accurate geographical location of routers.
Referring to
Upon accessing a website 102, an IP address 121 of a computer of the internet user 101 will be identified 120. The invention is not limited to a convention computer, but may include terminals, smart phones (PDA's) or other devices capable of communicating with the internet. Whenever the internet user 101 enters a website 102, the internet user's IP address 121 is identified for a website owner. It should be understood that IP Address means any internet communication protocol such as but not limited to IPV4 and IPV6.
The vendor 112 will then request 130 from the internet user 101 a contact number for a communications voice device 131, which is immediately accessible to the internet user 101 at the internet user's current location. Communication voice device, as used in the context of the present invention, applies to any voice device capable of communicating with another voice device such as, but not limited to, phone, mobile voice device, VoIP telephone or personal digital assistant (hereinafter PDA). Other non-limiting examples include any device that has been modified or designed for voice or text communication.
A geographical location 141 for the communication voice device 131 is then traced 140.
It should be understood that the term “mobile voice device”, as used in the context of the present invention, applies to any mobile device modified or designed for voice or text communication and capable of communicating with another device via wireless network such as but not limited to cellular system, radio system, WiFi, WiMax, RFID, Bluetooth, MIMO, UWB (Ultra Wide Band), satellite system or any other such wireless networks known now or in the future.
Other non-limiting examples include any device that has been modified or designed to communicate with a web-ready PDA, a Blackberry, a laptop computer with cellular connect capability, or a notification server, such as email server.
The geographical location 141 of a telephone can be traced using any one of existing databases. As a non-mobile telephone is attached to a single physical location, the location is available using various existing databases. A Voice over Internet Protocol (hereinafter VoIP) telephone is connected to high speed internet access such as Ti, DSL, cable modems, or other available connection systems. A VoIP location is available using various databases. A VoIP connection provider company can provide the IP address to which such VoIP telephone is connected such that the geographical location of the internet user is traceable to the IP address.
The geographical location 141 of a mobile voice device can be traced using technology such as, but not limited to, Galileo, GPS, cellular antenna network, phone antenna, WiFi, Bluetooth, MIMO, UWB, WiMax, etc.
A cellular telephone location system for automatically recording the location of one or more mobile cellular telephones is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,327,144. The system comprises a central site system operatively coupled to at least three cell sites. Each of the cell sites receives cellular telephone signals and integrates a timing signal common to all the cell sites.
The central site calculates differences in times of arrival of the cellular telephone signals arriving among the cell sites and thereby calculates the position of the cellular telephone producing the cellular telephone signals. Additional examples of known methods for locating phones are cell sector and cell site.
The position of an internet user's mobile voice device can be determined by, for example: (1) an internal positioning apparatus such as a Global Positioning System (hereinafter GPS) receiver built into the mobile voice device that receives GPS radio signals transmitted from GPS satellites; and (2) an external positioning apparatus such as a cellular positioning system that computes the position of the mobile voice device by observing time differences among the arrivals of a radio signal transmitted by the mobile voice device at a plurality of observation points, i.e., base stations. The operation of the GPS is well-known and will not be described further herein.
Next, the geographical location 151 of the IP address 121 of the internet user 101 is traced 150. Such an IP address 121 can be traced 150 geographically to its source so as to determine the location 151 (state and city) of the internet user 101. In some cases the system used to trace the IP address 121 can be so accurate that it can identify a street and house number of the internet user 101.
Several non-limiting examples for geographically tracing 140 an IP address 121 are “tracert 212.96.20.101” when using Windows, “traceroute 212.96.20.101” when using Linux. “Neotrace” www.neotrace.com, or www.ip2location.com, which shows the internet user 101 IP address 121 and a location 151 (city and state) of the internet user 101.
Another means for obtaining the geographical location 151 of the internet user's 101 IP address 121, the internet user's 101 ISP can be contacted to request a full address from where the internet user 101 is connected. For example, a modem dial-up internet user 101 is assigned a unique IP address 121 by their ISP. After the internet user 101 enters a username and password the ISP knows from which phone number that internet user 101 called and can trace a contacting number to a geographical location 151.
The geographical location 141 of the communications voice device 131 is then compared 160 with the geographical location 151 of the IP address 121 of the internet user 101, and a proximity value 161 is determined.
Referring to
Following the comparison 150, if the value 161 is outside the predetermined distance value range 171, determine 200 if additional authentication information 201 is required. What additional authentication information 201 that will be required is to be determined by the website 102 vendor 112. If additional authentication information 201 is required, the internet user 101 provides 220 the required authentication information 201. After determining 230 that the required additional authentication information 201 has been correctly provided, allocate 180 a positive security score 181, and allow predetermined access 190 to the website. If it is determined 230 that the required additional authentication information 201 has not been provided, a negative security score 211 is allocated 210 or access is terminated 212.
The present invention includes a method of locating a router's geographical location based on internet user communication voice device's geographical location and internet user IP address. In addition, the invention includes a method of geographically comparing the user communication voice device and the closet public router to the user IP address. Furthermore, the invention includes a method of comparing the geographical location of a router with the geographical location of the communication voice device of an internet user. Lastly, the invention includes a method of geographically comparing the internet user communication voice device and the internet user IP address. All of the methods may utilize a communication voice device that is either non-mobile telephone, a mobile telephone or a mobile voice device.
For locating more accurate geographical location of the routers the Vendor can perform trace-route or similar network analysis commands to the known internet user IP address. The trace-route commands (such as “traceroute” in Unix, Linux and OS-x, and ‘tracert’ or ‘pathping’ in Windows operating systems) is used in a wide variety of computer operating systems and network appliances. A trace-route command causes packets to be sent out with short lifetimes in order to map the IP addressable route to another machine. Each packet is given a slightly different lifetime. When a router expires the packet, it sends back a notification that includes its IP address. This allows a machine to identify the addresses of all the routers between the vendor and the internet user computer on the Internet.
Since the following is known:
The invention also includes a method of geographically comparing an internet user physical address and an internet user IP address. As well as a method of comparing a geographical location of a router with a geographical location of an internet user physical address, and a method of locating a router's geographical location based on an internet user physical address geographical location and internet user IP address geographical location. The term physical address is construed to mean mailing address or mailing zip code.
It is to be understood that the present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments under the doctrine of equivalents.
In conclusion, herein is presented a method and system for authenticating internet user identity. The invention is illustrated by example in the drawing figures, and throughout the written description. It should be understood that numerous variations are possible, while adhering to the inventive concept. Such variations are contemplated as being a part of the present invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/592,528, filed Feb. 4, 2022, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/724,361, filed Dec. 22, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,308,477. Application Ser. No. 16/724,361 is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/787,805, filed Oct. 19, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,521,786, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/606,270, filed May 26, 2017, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,289,833, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/134,545, filed Apr. 21, 2016, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,727,867, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/835,707, filed Aug. 25, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,391,985, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/479,266, filed Sep. 5, 2014 and now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/145,862, filed Dec. 31, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,033,225, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/479,235, filed May 23, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,770,477, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/065,691 filed Mar. 28, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,640,197, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/357,380, filed on Jan. 21, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,656,458, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/405,789 filed on Apr. 18, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,590,007, which in turn claims priority from U.S. provisional application No. 60/711,346 filed on Aug. 25, 2005. The contents of each one of the above prior applications is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5327144 | Stilp | Jul 1994 | A |
5335278 | Matchett | Aug 1994 | A |
5365451 | Wang | Nov 1994 | A |
5535431 | Grube | Jul 1996 | A |
5754657 | Schipper | May 1998 | A |
5757916 | MacDoran | May 1998 | A |
5790074 | Rangedahl | Aug 1998 | A |
5945944 | Krasner | Aug 1999 | A |
6012144 | Pickett | Jan 2000 | A |
6097938 | Paxson | Aug 2000 | A |
6236365 | LeBlanc | May 2001 | B1 |
6466779 | Moles | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6612488 | Suzuki | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625456 | Busso | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6771969 | Chinoy | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6882313 | Fan | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6975941 | Lau | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6978023 | Dacosta | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7013149 | Vetro | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7080402 | Bates | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7212806 | Karaoguz | May 2007 | B2 |
7305245 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7321775 | Maanoja | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7376431 | Niedermeyer | May 2008 | B2 |
7418267 | Karaoguz | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7450930 | Williams | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7497374 | Helsper | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7503489 | Heffez | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7577665 | Ramer | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7591020 | Kammer | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7594605 | Aaron | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7598855 | Scalisi | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7647164 | Reeves | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7669759 | Zettner | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7673032 | Augart | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7673793 | Greene | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7751829 | Masuoka | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7764231 | Karr | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7769396 | Alizadeh-Shabdiz | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7788134 | Manber | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7832636 | Heffez | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7848760 | Caspi Rami | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865181 | Macaluso | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7907529 | Wisely | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7908645 | Varghese et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8006190 | Quoc | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8006289 | Hinton | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8285639 | Eden | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8295898 | Ashfield | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8321913 | Turnbull | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8370340 | YuSam | Feb 2013 | B1 |
8370909 | Heffez | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8374634 | Dankar | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8572391 | Golan et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8606299 | Fok | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8611919 | Barnes, Jr. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8640197 | Heffez | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8668568 | Denker | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8676684 | Newman | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8739278 | Varghese | May 2014 | B2 |
8770477 | Hefetz | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8793776 | Jackson | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8904496 | Bailey | Dec 2014 | B1 |
9014666 | Bentley | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9033225 | Hefetz | May 2015 | B2 |
9391985 | Hefetz | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9413805 | Sainsbury | Aug 2016 | B2 |
9473511 | Arunkumar et al. | Oct 2016 | B1 |
9576119 | McGeehan | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9654477 | Kotamraju | May 2017 | B1 |
9727867 | Heffez | Aug 2017 | B2 |
10289833 | Hefetz | May 2019 | B2 |
10521786 | Hefetz | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10552583 | Piccionelli | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10554645 | Hefetz | Feb 2020 | B2 |
10645072 | Heffez | May 2020 | B2 |
11308477 | Hefetz | Apr 2022 | B2 |
20010034718 | Shaked | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020016831 | Peled | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019699 | McCarty | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035622 | Barber | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020053018 | Ota | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073044 | Singhal | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089960 | Shuster | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020188712 | Caslin | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009594 | McElligott | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030056096 | Albert | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061163 | Durfield | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065805 | Barnes | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030101134 | Liu | May 2003 | A1 |
20030134648 | Reed | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135463 | Brown | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030144952 | Brown | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030187800 | Moore | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190921 | Stewart | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191568 | Breed | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040073519 | Fast | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081109 | Oishi | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040088551 | Dor | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111640 | Baum | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040219904 | De Petris | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040230811 | Siegel | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040234117 | Tibor | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040242201 | Sasakura | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254868 | Kirkland | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259572 | Aoki | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050021738 | Goeller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050022119 | Kraemer | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050027543 | Yannis | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027667 | Kroll | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050065875 | Beard | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050066179 | Seidlein | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075985 | Cartmell | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050086164 | Kim | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050143916 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159173 | Dowling | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050160280 | Caslin | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050180395 | Moore | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198218 | Tasker | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060020812 | Steinberg | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031830 | Chu | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060064374 | Helsper | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060085310 | Mylet | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060085357 | Pizarro | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060090073 | Steinberg | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060107307 | Knox | May 2006 | A1 |
20060128397 | Choti | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060194592 | Tan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060217131 | Farshid | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060277312 | Hirsch | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282285 | Helsper | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070053306 | Stevens | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055672 | Stevens | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055684 | Stevens | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055732 | Stevens | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070055785 | Stevens | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070061301 | Ramer | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070084913 | Weston | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070133487 | Wang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136573 | Steinberg | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070174082 | Singh | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080046367 | Billmaier | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080046988 | Baharis | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080146193 | Bentley | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132170 | Farshid | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080189776 | Constable | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080222038 | Eden | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080248892 | Walworth | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249939 | Veenstra | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090260075 | Gedge | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090276321 | Krikorian | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100051684 | Powers | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110211494 | Rhodes | May 2011 | A1 |
20130091544 | Oberheide | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130104198 | Grim | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130197998 | Buhrmann | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130312078 | Oberheide | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140068723 | Grim | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140245379 | Oberheide | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245389 | Oberheide | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140245450 | Oberheide | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20150040190 | Oberheide | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150046989 | Oberheide | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150046990 | Oberheide | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150074408 | Oberheide | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150074644 | Oberheide | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150161378 | Oberheide | Jun 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1469368 | Oct 2004 | EP |
1696626 | Aug 2006 | EP |
1708527 | Oct 2006 | EP |
1875653 | Jan 2008 | EP |
2383497 | Jun 2003 | GB |
2402792 | Dec 2004 | GB |
1020030043886 | Jun 2003 | KR |
WO1996041488 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO2000075760 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO2001028272 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO2001054091 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO2002093502 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO2004079499 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO2004095857 | Nov 2004 | WO |
2005071988 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO2007004224 | Jan 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
K. Charlton, N. Taylor, 2004, “Online Credit Card Fraud against Small Businesses”, Australian Institute of Criminology Research and Public Policy Series, No. 60; pp. 14-20. https://www.aic.gov.au/publications/rpp/rpp60. |
Dorothy E.Denning, Peter F.MacDoran, Feb. 1966, “Location-based authentication: grounding cyberspace for better security”, Computer Fraud and Security, vol. 1996 No. 2 12-16. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1361372397826139. |
Hideyuki Takamizawa and Noriko Tanaka, Apr. 2012, “Authentication System Using Location Information on iPad or Smartphone” International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, vol. 4, No. 2,153-157. http://www.ijcte.org/papers/441-A075.pdf. |
Terry Sweeney, Mar. 5, 2008, “SIS Taps Mobiles to Reduce Credit Fraud”, Information Week Mar. 5, 2008. https://www.informationweek.com/sis-taps-mobiles-to-reduce-credit-fraud/d/d-id/1065356. |
Newbury Networks, WiFi Workplace, Jun. 19, 2004, “Enterprise WLAN Management & Security”, pp. 3-4. http://www.newburynetworks.com/downloads/WiFiWorkplace.pdf (via archive.org). |
Newbury Networks, Jun. 18, 2004, “WiFiWatchdog”, pp. 2-3. http://www.newburynetworks.com:80/downloads/WifiWatchDog_DataSeet.PDF via archive.org. |
Thomas Mundt, “Two Methods of Authenticated Positioning” Oct. 2, 2006, Q2SWinet '06: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international workshop on Quality of service & security for wireless and mobile networks, pp. 25-32. |
Bill N. Schilit et al., 2003, “Challenge: Ubiquitous Location-Aware Computing and the “Place Lab” Initiative”, Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Wireless Mobile Applications and Service Hotspots; Sep. 19, 2003, San Diego CA; pp. 29-35. |
Sybren A. Stuvel, “Sadako—Securing a building using IEEE 802.11”, Jun. 2006, B.S. Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam; pp. 7, 10, 16, 23. |
Cyota, Cyota Esphinx, 2006 http://www.cyota.com/product_7.asp; http://www.cyota.com/product_11_26.asp; http://www.cyota.com/product_11_25. asp (via archive.org). |
Debopam Acharya, Nitin Prabhu, and Vijay Kumar, 2005, “Discovering and Using Web Services in M-Commerce”, Technologies for E-Services, 5th International Workshop, TES 2004, Toronto, Canada, Aug. 29-30, 2004, 136-151; pp. 148-149. |
Jeyanthi Hall: “Detection of Rogue Devices in Wireless Networks”, Aug. 2006, Ph.D. Thesis, School of Computer Science, Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario; pp. 10, 91, 92, 98-100, 143, 203, 205, 208. |
Jakob E. Bardram, Rasmus E. Kjær, and Michael Ø. Pedersen, 2003, “Context-Aware User Authentication—Supporting Proximity-Based Login in Pervasive Computing”, UbiComp 2003: Ubiquitous Computing 5th International Conference, Seattle, WA, Oct. 12-15, 2003, Proceedings; pp. 111-113, 119. |
Adelstein et al., “Physically Locating Wireless Intruders”, 2005, Journal of Universal Computer Science, vol. 11, No. 1, 4-19; pp. 6-9, 17. |
CyberAngel, “CyberAngel Security Software White Paper”, Feb. 17, 2006; pp. 5, 7, 17, 18, 31. http://www.thecyberangel.com/pdfs/CyberAngelWhitePaper.pdf (via archive.org). |
Kenya Nishiki and Erika Tanaka: “Authentication and Access Control Agent Framework for Context-Aware Services”, 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on Applications and the Internet Workshops, Jan. 31, 2005-Feb. 4, 2005. |
Business Wire: “Newbury Networks Introduces RF Firewall for Location-Based Access Control and Policy Enforcement”, May 21, 2007; pp. 1-2. |
Wayne Jansen, Serban Gavrila and Vlad Korolev: “Proximity Beacons and Mobile Device Authentication: An Overview and Implementation.” Jun. 2005, National Institute of Standards and Technology Interagency Report No. 7200; pp. 1-2, 7, 19. |
PR Newswire: “Interlink Networks and Bluesoft Partner to Deliver Wi-Fi Location-Based Security Solutions” Apr. 24, 2003.; p. 1. |
Paul C. Van Oorschot, S. Stubblebine: “Countering Identity Theft through Digital Uniqueness, Location Cross-Checking, and Funneling” Feb. 28-Mar. 3, 2005 Financial Cryptography and Data Security, 9th International Conference, FC 2005, Roseau, Commonwealth of Dominica, 1-16. |
Shashwat V. Bhavsar, 2005, “Wireless Application Environments and Location-Aware Push Services”, Thesis, University of New Brunswick; pp. 119, 123, 138-142, 150, 152, 153. |
Simon G. M. Koo et al., “Location-based E-campus Web Services: From Design to Deployment”, 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, Mar. 26, 2003; pp. 4-5, 7. |
MaxMind LLC, “Skyhook Wireless and MaxMind Announce Partnership”, Jan. 30, 2006, p. 1. http://www.maxmind.com/app/news_20060130 (via archive.org). |
MaxMind LLC, “MaxMind minFraud”, Jan. 8, 2007; pp. 1-2. https://www.maxmind.com/MaxMind_minFraud_Overview.pdf (via archive.org). |
CyberAngel, “CyberAngel Security Solutions and Skyhook Wireless Announce Groundbreaking New Laptop Recovery System”, Jun. 20, 2005; pp. 1-2. http://www.thecyberangel.com/pr/TheCA_SkyhookPart.pdf (via archive.org). |
RSA Security, “RSA Adaptive Authentication” Mar. 14, 2006; p. 2 http://www.rsasecurity.com/solutions/consumer_authentication/ADAPT_SB_0106.pdf (via archive.org). |
RSA Security, “RSA Adaptive Authentication for Web”, 2006. https://web.archive.org/web/20061230232715/http://www.rsasecurity.com/node.asp?id=3018 (via archive.org). |
Cyota, “Cyota eSphinx—How does it work?”, 2006. http://www.cyota.com//product_7_19.asp (via archive.org). |
RSA Security, “RSA eFraudNetwork” 2006. http://www.rsasecurity.com/node.asp?id=3071 (via Archive.org). |
Seema R. Sharma, “Location based authentication”, M.S. Thesis, Univ.of New Orleans, May 20, 2005; pp. 17-25. |
Lenders, V. et al., “Location-Based Trust for Mobile User-granted Content: Applications, Challenges and Implementations”, HotMobile '08:Proceedings of the 9th workshop on Mobile computing systems and applications, Napa Valley, CA Feb. 25-26, 2008, pp. 60-64. |
Help Net Security, “Details on the new anti card fraud mobile phone technology”, Mar. 6, 2008 https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2008/03/06/details-on-the-new-anti-card-fraud-mobile-phone-technology. |
Yu Chen et al., “Cache Management Techniques for Privacy Preserving Location-based Services”, 2008, Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Mobile Data Management Workshops, MDMW, Beijing, China, Apr. 27-30, 2008; § 3. |
MaxMind LLC, “Online Guidelines for Preventing Online Credit Card Fraud”, May 2005. http://www.maxmind.com/app/prevent_credit_card_fraud (via archive.org). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240054495 A1 | Feb 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17592528 | Feb 2022 | US |
Child | 18496863 | US | |
Parent | 16724361 | Dec 2019 | US |
Child | 17592528 | US | |
Parent | 15787805 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16724361 | US | |
Parent | 15606270 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15787805 | US | |
Parent | 15134545 | Apr 2016 | US |
Child | 15606270 | US | |
Parent | 14835707 | Aug 2015 | US |
Child | 15134545 | US | |
Parent | 14479266 | Sep 2014 | US |
Child | 14835707 | US | |
Parent | 14145862 | Dec 2013 | US |
Child | 14479266 | US | |
Parent | 13479235 | May 2012 | US |
Child | 14145862 | US | |
Parent | 13065691 | Mar 2011 | US |
Child | 13479235 | US |