1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates, in general, to the fractionation of lignocellulosic material into lignin, cellulose and hemicelluloses, under vaporous cooking chemicals. In particular, alcohol sulfite vapors are applied to separate wood chips into cellulose fibers and dissolved lignin and hemicelluloses in an integrated biorefinery process.
2. Background of the Invention
Fractionation technologies of lignocellulosic material into its main subcomponents of cellulose, lignin and hemicelluloses have existed both in commercial practice and at the research level. Two examples are commercial sulfite pulping and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL, clean fractionation technology research.
Commercial sulfite pulping has been practiced since 1874. Industrial variants using calcium, magnesium, sodium and ammonia were developed by the 1940's.
Sulfite pulping produces spent cooking liquor termed sulfite liquor. Fermentation of sulfite liquor to hemicellulosic ethanol has been practiced primarily to reduce the environmental impact of the discharges from sulfite mills since 1909. In particular, a mill in Temiscaming, Ontario further ferments the sugars in ammonium sulfite spent liquor and sells the leftover lignosulfonates. Published design data from one of the two known remaining sulfite mills that produce ethanol, shows ethanol yields not to exceed 33% of the original hemicelluloses in wood. Ethanol yield is low due to the incomplete hydrolysis of the hemicelluloses and because only six carbon sugars are fermented, and further is further limited by the presence of sulfite pulping side products, such as furfural, methanol, acetic acid and others which inhibit fermentation to ethanol
Because of poor ethanol yield, lower cost of synthetic ethanol production from oil feed stock, and the production of ethanol from corn today, only two sulfite mills are known to have continued the practice of hemicellulosic ethanol production to date.
In the mid 20th century, Kraft pulping had eclipsed sulfite pulping as the dominant chemical pulping method. Kraft pulping however does not fractionate lignocellulosic material into its primary components. Instead, hemicelluloses are degraded in a strong solution of sodium hydroxide with or without sodium sulfide and lignin.
[Para 7] Vapor phase Kraft pulping is taught by Richter et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 3,532,594 Oct. 6, 1970). Inorganic cooking chemicals used for Kraft pulping must be impregnated in a separate vessel prior to vapor phase cooking. Additional cooking chemicals are then provided by fine spray to the cooking vessel to maintain appropriate chemical charge.
Solvent cooking chemicals have been tried as an alternative to Kraft or sulfite pulping. The original solvent process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 1,856,567 by Kleinert et al. Although three demonstration size facilities for ethanol-water (ALCELL), alkaline sulfite with anthraquinone and methanol (ASAM), and ethanol-water-sodium hydroxide (Organocell) were operated briefly in the 1990's, today there are no full scale solvent pulping mills. Of these technologies only ALCELL produced native reactive lignin by the use of pure aqueous organic solvents in elevated thermodynamic conditions. Lora, et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 5,865,948, Feb. 2, 1999) taught us that woodchips can be presteamed with a solvent present. The bulk delignification itself done in liquid phase under 6-9 parts of solvent liquid to one part of wood.
Gordy taught us pulping process to digest wood in vapors of sulfur dioxide and ammonia (U.S. Pat. No. 4,259,147, Mar. 31, 1981). Different grade pulps could be produced varying time from 10 to 60 minutes.
Groombridge et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 2,060,068 shows that an aqueous solvent with sulfur dioxide is a potent delignifying system to produce cellulose from lignocellulosic material. Their process was limited to 9% concentration of sulfur dioxide in the liquid phase.
Finally, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,730,837 to Black et al. claims liquid phase fractionation of lignocellulosic material into lignin, cellulose and dissolved sugars using ketone, alcohol, water and mineral acid. This is more readily known as the NREL clean fractionation technology. The separation of lignin and sugars in two immiscible layers are noted.
The present inventors have found pulping in aqueous alcohol solution with high concentration of sulfur dioxide leads to rapid solubilization of lignin and hemicelluloses. The concentration of sulfur dioxide is limited by solubility of sulfur dioxide at about 10% (w/w) in aqueous solution and 25% in ethanol solutions at room temperature. The solubility decreases rapidly at higher temperatures, making a commercial practice at very high concentration difficult.
Therefore in the prior art of digesting lignocellulosic material:
Surprisingly, the current inventors found the delignification rate to be approximately equal in vapor phase cooking. This discovery enables higher sulfur dioxide concentration applied on the wood chips, which speeds delignification and reduces cellulose degradation. Furthermore the cooking in vapor phase may improve the process economy by reducing the amount of cooking liquor charged to bulky wood chips and be suitable for dry and wet material.
The present inventors have now developed a process for the treatment of lignocellulosic material which produces pulp, fractionates the material and then converts each fraction into a reactive chemical feedstock. This is achieved through cooking lignocellulosic material with vapor phase with sulfur dioxide and ethanol. This can be done in a batch or continuous process.
The present invention describes a process of fractionating lignocellulosic material into lignin, cellulose and hydrolyzed hemicelluloses through a vapor phase cooking with an aliphatic alcohol and sulfur dioxide. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the wood chips are digested in pressurized vessel with low liquor volume, so that the cooking space is filled with ethanol and sulfur dioxide vapor in equilibrium with wood moisture. The cooked wood chips are washed in alcohol rich solution to recover lignin and dissolved hemicelluloses, while the remaining pulp is further processed to cellulose and paper products.
A more complete understanding of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
A process for fractionating lignocellulosic material in to chemically reactive components through vapor phase cooking of lignocellulosic material with gases of aliphatic alcohol, water, and sulfur dioxide comprising the steps of:
Charging wood chips, with approximate dimensions of 1″×½″×⅛″, in a pressurized vessel.
Filling the vessel partially with gaseous or aqueous solution of sulfur dioxide and ethanol separately or together.
Heating the vessel by direct steam injection or indirectly heating the cooling solution until most of the solution is in vapor phase of the digester.
Relieving the pressure in digester and recovering excess cooking chemicals for reuse.
Pumping or blowing the digested wood chips through a valve along with dilution to obtain a pulp suspension of certain consistency in a storage tank.
Washing to separate lignin and hemicelluloses from cellulose pulp in several stages.
The first process step is “cooking”, element 1 in
Hydrolyzate from the cooking step is subjected to pressure reduction, either at the end of a cook in a batch digester, or in an external flash tank after extraction from a continuous digester. The flash vapor from the pressure reduction is collected and recompressed for reuse in the digester vessel. The flash vapor contains substantially all the unreacted sulfur dioxide. The cellulose is then removed to be washed and further treated as required.
The process washing step, element 2 in
In an another embodiment of the invention, air dry or fresh wood chips are contacted with a solution of ethanol and water and SO2 in a digester, followed by drainage of the cooking liquor and then vapor phase cooking by direct injection of steam and/or ethanol vapor at a temperature and pressure to obtain the desired cooking temperature.
Although other modifications and changes may be suggested by those skilled in the art, it is the intention of the inventors to embody within the patent warranted hereon all changes and modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of their contribution to the art.
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 12/409,357, filed Mar. 23, 2009, which in turn is a non-provisional application claiming priority to application Ser. No. 61/064,744, filed Mar. 24, 2008. These patent applications are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3523060 | Walker, Jr. et al. | Aug 1970 | A |
3532594 | Richter et al. | Oct 1970 | A |
4259151 | Gordy | Mar 1981 | A |
4397712 | Gordy | Aug 1983 | A |
5338405 | Patt et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
6524436 | Kettunen et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110108223 A1 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61064744 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12409357 | Mar 2009 | US |
Child | 13004521 | US |