1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to ink jet printers, and, more particularly, to a method of altering an effective print resolution of an ink jet printer.
2. Description of the Related Art
An ink jet printer includes a carrier which moves in scan directions across an image area overlying a print medium. The carrier carries a printhead having a plurality of ink jetting orifices. Electronic control circuitry activates ink jetting heaters within the printhead to selectively jet ink drops from the ink jetting orifices as the printhead is scanned across the image area. The ink drops are placed at selected pixel locations in rows or scan lines of the image area. The print medium moves in an advance direction between scans a predetermined amount. In a multi-pass operation, multiple ink jetting orifices overly a given scan line for placing ink drops at selected pixel locations. In the case of color printing, multiple printheads are typically used, with each printhead being associated with a primary color ink. Depending upon the combination of different color inks which are placed at a given pixel location, different colors are produced.
The print resolution of a printed document is an important print quality parameter. In general, the image area is divided into a two dimensional array of rows and columns of pixels. The pixels usually have a common spacing in a vertical as well as horizontal direction. For example, the pixels may have a center to center spacing of 600 dots per inch (dpi) or 1200 dpi. A higher print resolution usually is preferred from a quality standpoint.
The print resolution to some extent is governed by electrical and mechanical constraints associated with a particular printer. For example, the ink jetting heaters within a printhead have thermal response times associated with activating and deactivating the heater. Further, the electronic circuitry is only capable of handling a predetermined number of instructions per duty cycle.
What is needed in the art is a method of altering (e.g., increasing) the print resolution of an ink jet printer using existing printer architecture or not significantly altering the architecture.
The present invention relates to a method of altering the effective print resolution of an ink jet printer, wherein a printhead is scanned across a scan line during a first scan at a first scan velocity and during a second scan at a second scan velocity, thereby altering the ink drop placement locations between scans to in turn alter the effective print resolution.
The invention comprises, in one form thereof, a method of printing using an ink jet printer, including the steps of: defining at least one scan line with a plurality of pixel locations spaced apart at a predetermined print resolution; scanning a printhead across the scan line at a first velocity; printing on the scan line at selected pixel locations at the first scan velocity; scanning the printhead across the scan line at a second scan velocity which is different from the first scan velocity; and printing on the scan line at selected pixel locations at the second scan velocity.
The present invention comprises, in another form thereof, a method of altering the effective print resolution of an ink jet printer including the steps of defining at least one scan line having a predetermined print resolution; scanning a printhead during a first scan across the scan line at a first scan velocity; printing on the scan line during the first scan at the predetermined print resolution; scanning the printhead during a second scan across the scan line at a second scan velocity which is different from the first scan velocity; and printing on the scan line during the second scan at the predetermined print resolution, thereby altering the effective print resolution of the ink jet printer.
An advantage of the present invention is that the print resolution of the ink jet printer may be altered to a desired effective print resolution.
Another advantage is that the print resolution may be altered using software which utilizes the same firmware and hardware of existing printers.
Yet another advantage is that the printhead velocity during the second scan may be calculated using a predetermined offset between the ink drop placement locations associated with the different printhead velocities.
The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention will be better understood by reference to the following description of an embodiment of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing, wherein:
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplification set out herein illustrates one exemplary embodiment of the invention, in one form, and such exemplification is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
Referring now to the drawings, and particularly to
Print medium 12 is advanced through a print zone in the ink jet printer in an advance direction 14. A printhead 16 is moveable in a bi-directional manner in scan directions 18 across the width of image area 8. Printhead 16, in known manner, includes one or more columns of ink jetting orifices (not shown) which are successively associated with different scan lines 10 within image area 8. As print medium 12 is advanced in advance direction 14, a particular ink jetting orifice becomes associated with a different scan line 10. Printhead 16, also in known manner, is typically carried by an ink jet cartridge (not shown), which in turn is carried by a carrier (not shown) which is moveable in a selected one of the scan directions 18.
The top portion of
Referring now to the position of printhead 16 at the top, right portion of
Referring now to
Referring to the left hand portion of
During a second scan of printhead 16 across a scan line 10 on print medium 12, an ink drop is fired from an ink jetting orifice at the same firing position FP but at a second scan velocity V2 which result in the ink drop trajectory labeled with reference T2. The ink drop placement location is thus spaced apart a distance X2 from the firing position FP so that the print resolution may be altered.
In the embodiment shown, and as will be described in more detail hereinafter, the spacing between the ink drop placement locations between the first and second scans is 4800 dpi.
In the example shown, printhead 16 fires ink drops at selected firing positions which are spaced apart 600 dpi from each other. Nonetheless, using the method of the present invention, printhead 16 prints at a print resolution of 2400 dpi during successive first scans and at a print resolution of 2400 dpi during successive second scans resulting in an effective print resolution of 4800 dpi.
More particularly, printhead 16 is moved during successive first scans at first scan velocity V1 across print medium 16 and selectively fired at firing positions which are spaced 600 dpi apart. This results in ink drop placement locations represented by reference number 1 at the hash lines overlying print medium 12. Using the same firing position FP which resulted in placement of an ink drop at position 1 when printhead 16 is scanned at first scan velocity V1, the printhead 16 is scanned during a second scan at second scan velocity V2 which causes a different ink drop trajectory represented by trajectory line T2 which places an ink drop at the position represented by hash line A.
Between successive first scans, printhead 16 is shifted to a different start position a distance of 2400 dpi (i.e., ¼ of the 600 dpi print resolution). Printhead 16 is again scanned across the print medium 12; however, the firing positions FP have been shifted by 2400 dpi because of the different start position. This results in an ink drop placement location represented by hash line 2 on print medium 12. Using the same firing position FP which resulted in placement of an ink drop at position 2 when printhead 16 is scanned at first scan velocity V1, the printhead 16 is scanned during a second scan at second scan velocity V2 which causes a different ink drop trajectory represented by trajectory line T2 which places an ink drop at the position represented by hash line B.
Printhead 16 is then shifted another bi-directional alignment value of 2400 dpi and scanned at a first scan velocity V1 to place an ink drop at hash line 3. Printhead 16 is subsequently scanned at second scan velocity V2 using the same firing position to selectively place an ink drop at hash line C.
Printhead 16 is then shifted another bi-directional alignment value of 2400 dpi and scanned at a first scan velocity V1 to selectively place an ink drop at hash line 4. Printhead 16 is then scanned at a second scan velocity V2 using the same firing positions to selectively place an ink drop at hash line D. This process is repeated for each scan line 10 on image area 8 to selectively print the entire image area 8 at an effective print resolution of 4800 dpi.
Of course, the actually effective print resolution which is achieved using the method of the present invention may vary from one application to another. In the example shown, the second scan velocity V2 has a magnitude which is greater than the first scan velocity V1 by a predetermined amount in order to achieve a desired effective print resolution. However, the second scan velocity can be any desired value which is necessary to place ink drops at selected locations, depending upon the particular application. The second scan velocity can even be less than the first scan velocity if desired.
A method of determining a second scan velocity in order to achieve a desired spacing between ink drops during first and second scans using the same firing positions will now be described in greater detail.
The associated variables are the velocity of the ink drop (Vdrop), the printhead to paper gap (G), the carrier velocities of interest (V1 and V2), and the corresponding displacements in drop location (X1 and X2). The flight time (Tf) of the drop is given by the mathematical expression:
Tf=G/Vdrop
Therefore, the drop displacement due to carrier velocity is defined as:
X1=V1*Tf and X2=V2*Tf
The goal is to determine V2 such that the difference dX between X1 and X2 is some defined distance:
X2=X1+dX
Solving for V2 yields:
V2=V1+dX/Tf
or
dV=dX/Tf=Vdrop*dX/G (Equation 1)
One could either assume some nominal values of G and Vdrop to compute dV, or extract this information from measured alignment distances. This alignment distance can be determined from printing uni-directionally at 2 velocities, such as shown in
dV=dX*(V3−V1)/dX′ (Equation 2)
Alternatively, the same information can be extracted from bi-directional alignment as shown in
dV=V1*dX/(Y/2)
For example, if an adjustment of dX= 1/4800″ is desired, and Vdrop=500 ips, and G=0.05″, equation 1 then provides a dV=2.08 ips. Equation 2 can be used to adjust for variations in machines and printheads. For example, if the alignment at V1=30 ips was measured to be Y= 8/1200″, then dV 1.875 ips.
While this invention has been described with respect to an exemplary design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4097873 | Martin | Jun 1978 | A |
4167014 | Darling et al. | Sep 1979 | A |
4216480 | Buehner et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
5359355 | Nagoshi et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5483605 | Rostamian | Jan 1996 | A |
5527121 | Santon | Jun 1996 | A |
5541625 | Holstun et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5600351 | Holstun et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5604597 | Imai | Feb 1997 | A |
5606350 | Koyama | Feb 1997 | A |
5648805 | Keefe et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5736993 | Regimabal et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5745128 | Lam et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751470 | Damon | May 1998 | A |
5767870 | Klasssen et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5788385 | Inoue et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5982998 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5992968 | Uetsuki et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6003969 | Freret, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
6022104 | Lin et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6033053 | Eun | Mar 2000 | A |
6042281 | Ohtani | Mar 2000 | A |
6049393 | Knierim et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6132022 | Akiyama et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6164773 | Oikawa | Dec 2000 | A |
6217150 | Heydinger | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6234613 | Feinn et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6244690 | Kwon et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6270185 | Askeland | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6293641 | Yoshimura et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293651 | Sawano | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6318827 | Brenner et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6338542 | Fugimori | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6354691 | Uchikata | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6367908 | Serra et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6439686 | Glass | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467894 | Misumi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6609777 | Endo | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6715856 | Mihara | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6860588 | Holstun et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6880909 | King et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
20010015734 | Kanda et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010040596 | Lee et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020039121 | Ho et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020057303 | Takahashi et al. | May 2002 | A1 |