This invention is directed to a video surveillance system, and in particular, by way of example and not limitation, to a video surveillance system adapted to be mounted in a law enforcement vehicle for producing a permanent digital evidentiary record, on a multi-media disc, of a traffic stop or other event and incidents occurring after a suspect's vehicle has been stopped.
In law enforcement, a reliable witness that is incapable of perjury is needed to substantiate actions taken by a law enforcement officer and to protect the officer against false allegations by persons involved in an incident. An excellent witness of this type is a video recording of the incident, now widely used in traffic stops and criminal investigations, which can be reviewed after the incident and archived. By recording the incident first-hand as it actually happens, video recordings serve to eliminate conflicting individual interpretations of the incident and facilitate effective and efficient law enforcement.
Vehicle-mounted video cameras to make video records of an incident or scene external to the law enforcement vehicle are well known in the art. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,949,186 to Peterson discloses a vehicle-mounted system in which a video-cassette recorder is housed in a vault located in the trunk of a patrol car. U.S. Pat. No. 5,677,979 to Squicciarini et al discloses a video surveillance system which integrates the outputs of a video camera, a radar unit, a remote control, and a wireless microphone to produce a comprehensive video recording of an incident from its beginning to the end. This system also uses a video cassette recorder to capture the incident on videotape. However, VHS and digital video tapes are bulky, requiring considerable space for storage, are susceptible to damage, and degrade over time. Additionally, the data on tapes may only be accessed sequentially.
A video-data chapter segmentation method includes monitoring for at least one external start trigger, and responsive to detection of at least one of the at least one external start trigger, creating a chapter start point at a point in the video data corresponding to a specified time preceding the at least one detected external start trigger. The method further includes initiating recording of the video data beginning at the point in the video data and monitoring for at least one stop trigger. The method still further includes responsive to detection of at least one of the at least one stop trigger, creating a chapter stop point at a point in the data corresponding to a specified time preceding the at least one detected stop trigger.
A video-data chapter segmentation computer system includes a processor and a memory. The memory includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of monitoring for at least one external start trigger, and responsive to detection of at least one of the at least one external start trigger, creating a chapter start point at a point in the video data corresponding to a specified time preceding the at least one detected external start trigger. The software instructions are further adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of initiating recording of the video data beginning at the point in the video data, monitoring for at least one stop trigger, and responsive to detection of at least one of the at least one stop trigger, creating a chapter stop point at a point in the data corresponding to a specified time preceding the at least one detected stop trigger.
A data-encoding system includes a source of unencoded data, and a first encoder interoperably coupled to the source, wherein the first encoder is adapted to receive the unencoded data, encode the unencoded data, and output encoded data at a first data rate. The data encoding system further includes a second encoder interoperably coupled to the source, wherein the second encoder is adapted to receive the unencoded data, encode the unencoded data, and output encoded data at a second data rate in which the second data rate exceeds the first data rate.
A data-encoding method includes a first encoder interoperably coupled to a source of unencoded data receiving the unencoded data, encoding the unencoded data, and outputting encoded data at a first data rate. The method further includes a second encoder interoperably coupled to the source receiving the unencoded data, encoding the unencoded data, and outputting encoded data at a second data rate, wherein the second data rate exceeds the first data rate.
A data-overflow-handling method includes storing at least one of captured audio data, video data, and metadata to a first directory of a non-removable data storage medium, and determining whether an event is being recorded. The method further includes responsive to a determination that an event is being recorded, storing an image of the stored at least one of captured audio data, video data, and metadata to a second directory of the non-removable data storage medium. The method still further includes determining whether a predefined capacity threshold relative to a removable data storage medium has been exceeded, and responsive to a determination that the predefined capacity threshold has been exceeded, creating a third directory of the non-removable data storage medium. The method still further includes determining whether data in the second directory of the non-removable storage medium has not been stored to the removable data storage medium, and responsive to a determination that data in the second directory of the non-removable storage medium has not been stored to the removable data storage medium, storing any unstored data in the second directory to the removable data storage medium. The method further includes determining whether the second directory contains finalization files, and responsive to a determination that the second directory contains finalization files, finalizing the removable storage medium and providing a prompt to insert another removable storage medium. The method still further includes responsive to a determination that the second directory contains no finalization files, returning to the step of determining whether data in the second directory of the non-removable storage medium has not been stored to the removable data storage medium.
A data-overflow-handling computer system includes a processor and a memory. The memory includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of storing at least one of captured audio data, video data, and metadata to a first directory of a non-removable data storage medium, determining whether an event is being recorded, and responsive to a determination that an event is being recorded, storing an image of the stored at least one of captured audio data, video data, and metadata to a second directory of the non-removable data storage medium. The memory further includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of determining whether a predefined capacity threshold relative to a removable data storage medium has been exceeded, and responsive to a determination that the predefined capacity threshold has been exceeded, creating a third directory of the non-removable data storage medium. The memory further includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of determining whether data in the second directory of the non-removable storage medium has not been stored to the removable data storage medium, and responsive to a determination that data in the second directory of the non-removable storage medium has not been stored to the removable data storage medium, storing any unstored data in the second directory to the removable data storage medium. The memory further includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of determining whether the second directory contains finalization files, and responsive to a determination that the second directory contains finalization files, finalizing the removable storage medium and providing a prompt to insert another removable storage medium. The memory still further includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the step of responsive to a determination that the second directory contains no finalization files, returning to the step of determining whether data in the second directory of the non-removable storage medium has not been stored to the removable data storage medium.
A method for archiving data includes receiving data, storing the data on a first data storage medium, and selecting a portion of the data. The method further includes determining if at least one environmental factor indicates that environmental conditions are acceptable for storing the selected portion of the data on a second data storage medium. The method still further includes responsive to a determination that the at least one environmental factor indicates that environmental conditions are acceptable, storing the selected portion of the data on the second data storage medium.
A computer system for archiving data includes a processor and a memory. The memory includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of receiving data, storing the data on a first data storage medium, and selecting a portion of the data. The memory further software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of determining if at least one environmental factor indicates that environmental conditions are acceptable for storing the selected portion of the data on a second data storage medium, and responsive to a determination that the at least one environmental factor indicates that environmental conditions are acceptable, storing the selected portion of the data on the second data storage medium.
A data security method includes performing a checksum on data contained on a removable data storage medium, and storing the checksum on the removable data storage medium in at least one of an encrypted and a hidden form. The method further includes storing a unique serial number pertaining to the removable storage medium to the removable storage medium, and storing a checksum and a corresponding unique serial number of a plurality of previous removable storage media to the removable storage medium.
A data security computer system includes a processor and a memory. The memory includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of performing a checksum on data contained on a removable data storage medium, and storing the checksum on the removable data storage medium in at least one of an encrypted and a hidden form. The memory further includes software instructions adapted to enable the computer system to perform the steps of storing a unique serial number pertaining to the removable storage medium to the removable storage medium, and storing a checksum and a corresponding unique serial number of a plurality of previous removable storage media to the removable storage medium.
The above summary of the invention is not intended to represent each embodiment or every aspect of the present invention.
A more complete understanding of the method and apparatus of the present invention may be obtained by reference to the following Detailed Description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings wherein:
Referring now to
In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, the video processor 25 includes a video picture-over-picture (POP) field programmable gate array (FPGA) chip that processes video from one or more sources to combine the video from the multiple sources to be combined into a single video stream. For example, two video camera feeds can be processed by the video processor 25 for simultaneous display on the same screen as a split screen image. The system of
The system of
The digital audio signal 55 is then provided to each of the first and second audio/video encoder ICs 40a, 40b. Each of the first and second audio/video encoder ICs 40a, 40b encodes the video stream received from the video bus 35 and the digital audio signal 55 from the audio analog-to-digital converter 45 as respective encoded audio/video streams 60a and 60b, such as, for example, MPEG-2 streams. In various embodiments of the present invention, the first audio/video encoder IC 40a and the second audio/video encoder IC 40b output representations of the same video and audio streams that have been encoded at different data rates in parallel. For example, in accordance with principles of the present invention, the first audio/video encoder IC 40a outputs a high-bit-rate encoded stream 60a (e.g., 6.0 Mbps), while the second audio/video encoder IC 40b outputs a low-bit-rate encoded stream 60b (e.g., 1.0 Mbps) representation of the same audio and video signals. The low-bit-rate stream can be obtained, for example, by reducing at least one of the video resolution and the frame rate. The system of
The resolution, bit-rate, and frame rate of both the low-bit-rate stream and the high-bit-rate stream can be set based on a record length selection made in a setup menu. Some example combinations are shown in Table 1:
Each of the first encoded stream 60a and the second encoded stream 60b are then provided to a system FPGA 70. The system FPGA 70 provides the first encoded stream 60a and the second encoded stream 60b over an IDE bus 75 to a hard drive 80. The system of
The system of
The microcontroller 90 is further provided with a data input 110 for receiving metadata including externally-measured data. Examples of metadata that can be provided to the data input 110 include Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates, GPS calculated patrol speed, vehicle speed sensor (VSS) calculated patrol speed, radar measured patrol speed, radar target speed, accelerometer X, Y, and Z values, braking status, emergency lights status, siren status, system board temperature, drive door opening and closing logging, power up and power down logging, and DVD disc ejection and insertion logging. The metadata is provided by the microcontroller 90 to the system FPGA 70, which further transmits the metadata to the hard drive 80, where it is written to a metadata log file in association with the encoded audio and video data. Accordingly, a particular item of metadata can be directly linked to the audio and video segment obtained at the time that the metadata item was measured.
In addition, a subset of the metadata is included in the encoded audio and video data so that it is available for viewing in parallel with the audio and video during playback. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the subset of the metadata is included in one or more closed-captioning fields of an MPEG-2 encoded DVD disc. An advantage provided by including the subset of the metadata in a closed-captioning field is that the visibility of the metadata information can be selectively toggled by a viewer of the audio and video. Another advantage provided by including the subset of the metadata in a closed-captioning field is that the information in the closed-captioning field is a text overlay that does not effect the encoding of the underlying video; thus, the underlying video is not degraded by the inclusion of the metadata. Examples of metadata that may be included in the closed-captioning field include time, date, frame counter, vehicle ID, GPS longitude and latitude, vehicle speed (from VSS signal), radar target speed, radar patrol car speed, remote microphone active indicator, emergency lights active indicator, siren active indicator, braking in progress indicator, and camera ID and zoom level. In still another embodiment of the present invention, the subset of metadata may by provided in a subtitle field.
The system of
The system of
Event Based Recording
In various embodiments of the present invention, recording of video, audio, and metadata is event-based. In these embodiments, the system only records when a triggering event has occurred, for example, when the user turns on the emergency lights, siren, the onboard accelerometers sense a vehicle crash, or when the user manually hits a record button. Upon occurrence of the event, the beginning of a recorded event is marked. Other examples of an event that initiates recording can be, for example, a traffic stop, a chase, a domestic call, or pulling into a driveway. The recording of the event continues until a stop point is determined. In at least one embodiment of the present invention, the stop point is determined when the user hits a stop button. The system may also include an automatic stop event that allows the system to automatically stop recording at a predetermined time after all start record triggers have been turned off (e.g., the lights and siren are off and the wireless microphone is off), but the user has forgotten to hit the stop button. If the system detects that that condition has occurred based on user settings, it can decide to enter a stop flag and stop recording the event.
In at least one embodiment of the present invention, when the system is turned on, two data streams (i.e., a high bit-rate stream and a low bit-rate stream) as well as metadata are recorded to the hard drive 80. The metadata may include, for example, the status of the brake lights, status of the emergency lights and siren, GPS coordinates, the vehicle's speed, data from an interface from the police radar system, etc. The metadata and the high and low bit-rate streams are time-stamped and synchronized. During recording to a DVD disc, the video and/or audio of events, as well as the metadata are recorded to the DVD disc.
The system may also use vehicle speed as a recording trigger where the system can initiate the recording of an event if the patrol car exceeds a preset speed. For example, a department supervisor can decide that if an officer ever goes in excess of 110 miles an hour, the system should begin recording an event to the hard drive 80 or the DVD drive 85. A new event begins automatically and the officer has no control over the recording of the event. Likewise, organizations outside of law enforcement may utilize threshold criteria for initiating self-activating monitoring of persons or conditions.
Opportunistic Archiving
The automobile environment is subject to demanding environmental conditions for the operation of electronic equipment. Recording onto a rewriteable DVD in an automobile environment is particularly subject to these conditions. A system in accordance with principles the present invention has a drive suspension system in place. The system monitors shock and vibration in x, y, and z axes using accelerometers. The system may also monitor the vehicle speed by one or more of three methods. The system can monitor vehicle speed through the VSS signal. If an optional GPS subsystem is included in the system, the system can get speed coordinates from the GPS data. If the system is interfaced to a radar system and the radar is operating in moving mode, the system can get vehicle speed from the radar. In various embodiments of the present invention, an opportunistic archiving algorithm is used that provides parameters and steering as to when the system should burn to the DVD drive 85. Using shock and vibration measurements, the opportunistic archiving algorithm is adapted to ensure that data is not written to the DVD disc until environmental conditions are acceptable for doing so.
Referring now to
If a determination is made that a record trigger is active (step 230), the data to be archived on the DVD is selected (step 235). The range of data to be archived includes selected time periods before and after event start and stop points. For example, the system can be configured to archive a range of data that extends from ten minutes prior to the start point and ten minutes after the stop point. At step 240, a verification of environmental factors is performed to insure that environmental conditions are acceptable for recording data to the DVD disc. The environmental factors can include, for example, temperature, shock, and vibration measurements. If the environmental factors are determined to exceed DVD drive limits (step 245), better environmental conditions are waited for via use of, for example, a timer (step 250), and the procedure returns to step 240. Steps 240-255 can be characterized collectively as opportunistic-archiving steps.
If the environmental factors are determined to be within predetermined limits (step 255), burning of a sector of data to the DVD disc is initiated (step 260). During the burn cycle, accelerometers are monitored to determine whether any G-spikes exceed tolerable limits (step 265). An example of a tolerable limit for burning of data to a DVD is less than 0.3 G. If it is determined that a G-spike occurred during the burn cycle that is above tolerable limits (step 270), a decision is made to rewrite the sector in question (step 275) and the procedure returns to step 260. If it is determined that no G-spikes occurred during the burn cycle that are above the tolerable limits (step 280), the procedure continues to the next sector to be burned (step 285) and then returns to step 205. Steps 260-285 can be characterized collectively as reactive correction steps.
Referring now to
If a determination is made that a record trigger is active (step 330), the data to be archived on the DVD is selected (step 335). The range of data to be archived includes selected time periods before and after event start and stop points. For example, the system can be configured to archive a range of data that extends from ten minutes prior to the start point and ten minutes after the stop point. At step 340, a verification of environmental factors is performed in order to insure that environmental conditions are acceptable for recording data to the DVD disc. The environmental factors can include, for example, temperature, shock, and vibration measurements. If the environmental factors are determined to exceed DVD drive limits (step 345), better environmental conditions are waited for via use of, for example, a timer (step 350), and the procedure returns to step 340. Steps 340-355 can be characterized collectively as opportunistic archiving steps.
If the environmental factors are determined to be within predetermined limits (step 355), burning a sector of data to the DVD disc is initiated (step 360). At step 365, a checksum is calculate for the sector from hard drive data. The burned sector is then read from the DVD disc (step 370), and a checksum is calculated from the sector read from the DVD (step 375). The checksum obtained from hard drive data and the checksum obtained from the burned DVD sector are compared and, if the checksums do not match, the sector is rewritten (step 380) and the procedure returns to step 360. If the checksums match, the archiving procedure returns to step 305. Steps 360-385 can be characterized collectively as DVD burn error correction steps.
In various embodiments, an opportunistic archiving algorithm may be used that also considers, in addition to environmental factors, how much data the system needs to archive to the DVD disc. For example, if the system starts off in the morning and there have been no events and no start flags, the system is operating with zero unburned events. However, if, for example, the user gets into a high-speed chase that lasts for three hours and the system has not detected a stop trigger, the system has recorded three hours of unburned data to the hard drive 80. In this situation, the system could lower the environmental limits, at step 255 or 355 for example, in order to archive the large amount of accumulated data to the DVD disc. Environmental conditions, including a speed factor, may also be considered. The system may consider whether the vehicle is driving along at a high rate of speed (e.g., hundred miles an hour) or if it is stopped. The algorithm may also consider accumulated shock and vibration.
The algorithm processing starts with the calculation of how much data is present and comes up with a numerical value. And then the processor using the algorithm comes up with a numerical value for how conducive the environment is to DVD burning. The processor using the algorithm subtracts the environment number from the unburned data number and comes up with a value. If the value is positive, the need to burn data is greater than how bad the environmental conditions are. If the algorithm defines a negative number, the unburned data does not outweigh how bad the environmental conditions are.
If the environmental conditions are very poor, the system does not record anything. Instead, the system just waits and monitors for a while and checks the environmental conditions again. If the speed factor is zero (i.e., the car is stopped), that is preferably an automatic burn decision. Condition one is no speed, which is preferably an automatic decision to burn anything on the hard drive 80 that needs to be burned. Condition number two is unacceptable environmental conditions under which the system does not burn anything. Condition number three is somewhere in between, in which the system has some unburned event data, the car is moving, and determinations are made regarding how bad the conditions are, how much does the need to burn data outweigh the environmental conditions that the system detects.
The hard drive 80 of the system preferably has a accelerometer to detect physical shocks. When the hard drive 80 detects an unacceptable shock, the system goes back and recopies the last section. An error is assumed, so the last DVD section is overwritten. The hard drive 80 may be mounted on a vibration shock mount as well. In various embodiments, the DVD drive 85 can also include an accelerometer to detect physical shocks. Hard drives typically have a 200 g shock tolerance whereas DVD drives typically have a 0.5 g shock tolerance.
An illustrative opportunistic archiving algorithm could utilize the following equation:
(Buffer Amount)−[(Speed Factor)+(Shock Factor)+(Vibration Factor)]=Archive Threshold
where
Buffer Amount=Size of Data Buffer
Speed Factor=Accumulated Vehicle Speed From Recent History
Shock Factor=Peak Shock in Recent History
Vibration Factor=Accumulated Vibration From Recent History
If the Archive Threshold is exceeded, the need to burn data overrides the environmental conditions. If the Archive Threshold is not exceeded, the amount of unburned data does not override the environmental conditions.
Automatic Chapter Segmentation by Event Markers
In various embodiments of the present invention, the system may be adapted to automatically divide the video into separate navigable chapters to make location of a specific point or event easier during playback, such that each chapter of the DVD disc contains the data from one event. This process eliminates the need to fast forward or rewind the media to search for a specific traffic stop or event. The start of an event period is determined by monitoring metadata from various devices, such as external emergency lights, emergency siren, wireless microphone activation, extreme shock data from accelerometers indicating, for example, a collision or panic braking, an elapsed time period, etc. The start of an event period can also be determined by an operator pressing a RECORD key on a control panel.
The end of an event is determined by the operator pressing a STOP key on the control panel or by the passage of a predetermined period of time after any triggering device is turned off or is inactive. In various embodiments, when the system is turned on, all video data, audio data, and metadata is continuously written to the hard drive 80, and only event data is written to the DVD disc. The system is able to automatically include video and audio data that occurred prior to the start of the event period or after the end of an event period by moving event start and end flags based on rules determined by user settings. For example, a setting in a user-interface menu can be used to determine how much data to include in the DVD chapter before and after the event markers.
Referring now to
If a record trigger is detected (step 420), a new chapter start point is initiated (step 425) that includes a specified number of minutes of data from before the event start point to the beginning of the chapter. At step 430, burning of the data from the event period to the DVD is started. At step 435, monitoring of stop triggers is performed. The stop triggers may be either generated by a timer or user-initiated. If a stop trigger is not detected (step 440), event recording is continued (step 445), and the procedure returns to step 430. If a stop trigger is detected (step 450), a chapter stop point is determined, which step includes a specified number of minutes of data from after the event stop point being added to the end of the chapter (step 455). Next, the DVD chapter menu is built (step 460), a video frame from the event is selected for use as a selectable chapter icon (step 465), and a time/date stamp from the chapter stop point is used as part of the chapter name/number (step 470). Next, the DVD chapter is closed out (step 475), and the procedure returns to step 405.
Parallel High and Low Bit-Rate Encoding
In order to provide users with the ability to archive as many hours of video and audio data on to a single DVD disc, while still providing maximum video quality for important events, various embodiments of the present invention provide for encoding multiple versions of the same video and audio source in parallel. The system encodes both a high bit-rate stream and a lower bit-rate stream. Both streams are buffered and written to the hard drive 80.
The rules for archiving event data to the DVD disc can be determined by user settings. During typical operation, the system will automatically transfer the lower bit-rate video stream to the DVD disc based on event markers. Should the system capture some video or audio footage that the user deems to be important, the user can transfer the high bit-rate version to the DVD disc from data on the hard drive 80. This process allows users to make extended-length recordings without having to sacrifice audio and video quality of important events.
A user may choose high or low quality video after an event has occurred. The system by default archives events to the DVD that are low quality. After the recording has been made, if something that was important has occurred, the user can easily go back and set new start and stop flags. A section of video may be chosen, whether it was included in the original event or not, a new chapter added to the DVD, and a high resolution version of the video can be chosen to be burned to DVD. After the fact, a user can choose to grab any video from the hard drive 80 and make new chapters on the DVD. The new chapters can be based on the same event or on multiple events or non-events, and then a user could choose high or low resolution.
Referring now to
If an operator deems a time period from the data buffer to be important (step 540), the system takes the high-bit-rate data from the important time period (step 545) selected by the operator. At step 550, the low-bit-rate data and the selected portion of the high-bit-rate data are written to storage media, such as a DVD disc, hard drive, flash memory, etc. (step 550). In various embodiments, the step 550 of writing the low-bit-rate data to the storage media can include opportunistic archiving such as that described with respect to
Record after-the-Fact
Recording after-the-fact permits manual chapter event creation to be performed. If a user wants to go in after the fact and copy some video that wasn't marked as an event, the user can go back and manually put in a new start and stop point. The system will automatically grab that section of video and feed it to the DVD drive 85 and make a new chapter. The common use of that feature will be by, for example, internal affairs in order to investigate some alleged misconduct. Of course, embodiments of the system may be applied to areas outside of the area of law enforcement, and then the conduct referred to may be an officer or another party in an organization utilizing the methods and systems of the present invention.
Drive Suspension System
A drive suspension system in accordance with principles of the present invention permits isolation of the DVD drive from environmental conditions that could impair DVD burning. Different suspension systems may be used in different versions of the system. One version of the system as currently envisioned is entirely overhead-console mounted. Another version of the system is a multi-piece unit (e.g., two) that may be used when there is not room to mount the overhead console-mounted version. In the second version, the user can, for example, put the recording unit underneath the seat and the display and control panel on a stalk near the radio console area. Although packaging for the drive suspension system is different on the two versions discussed, the underlying principles are analogous and other versions are possible without departing from principles of the present invention.
Referring now to
In the under-seat version of the system, a spring orientation pivot 640 is used to permit horizontal mounting or vertical mounting (e.g., on the side of a cage) or mounting on a stalk or on a center console. If the system is mounted flat, the springs are mounted in an upward orientation. However, if the user turns the orientation such that the drive is pointing upward and gravity is trying to pull the drive in a different direction, the spring may be pivoted so that the spring is able to handle the gravity load in that direction.
Automatic DVD-Video Disc Record Overflow Handling
Various embodiments of the invention provide a method to seamlessly allow a user to record data onto the DVD disc to the disc's capacity, yet continue to capture and prepare additional data intended to be burned onto another DVD disc. With previous in-vehicle recording systems, there was a risk of running out of media (e.g., DVD) space during the middle of a patrol officer's shift. Since the media is considered evidentiary in nature, many law enforcement agencies limit access to the media, and do not provide the officer with a second piece of media. Thus, when the media became full, it would necessitate a trip back to the police station to replace the media with blank media. Automatic DVD-Video disc record overflow handling in accordance with principles of the invention serves to eliminate the need for an officer to return to the police station to replace media during a shift. The officer may continue recording even after the DVD media is at capacity. In a typical case, the system finalizes a first DVD and automatically prepares unburned data for an additional DVD. When new media (e.g., DVD) is inserted into the drive, the unburned data is automatically transferred onto the new media.
Referring now to
If it is determined that the system is in event-record mode (step 725), the procedure continues to step 730, at which step data is written into a DVD image working directory on the hard drive 80. At step 735, a determination is made regarding whether the working directory is close to reaching the size limit of the DVD disc. If it is determined that the working directory is not close to reaching the size limit of the DVD disc (step 740), the procedure returns to step 715. If it is determined that the working directory is close to reaching the size limit of the DVD disc, a DVD chapter-stop point is initiated and a DVD chapter menu is built (step 745). Next, all remaining files for the DVD-video image are closed out (step 750), the current working directory is saved (step 755), and a new working directory is created (step 760). The procedure then returns to step 715. Steps 730-760 can be characterized collectively as DVD image preparation steps.
From step 730, an execution proceeds also to step 765. At step 765, un-burned data in the working directory is looked for. Next, a determination is made regarding whether there is un-burned data in the working directory (step 770). If there is no un-burned data in the working directory (step 775), the process returns to step 765. If there is unburned data in the working directory, DVD-video data from the working directory is transferred on to the DVD-video disc (step 780). At step 785, a determination is made regarding whether the working directory contains finalized files. If the working directory does not contain finalized files (step 787), the procedure returns to step 765. If the working directory contains finalized files, the DVD is finalized (step 790). At step 795, the user is prompted to replace the current DVD with a blank DVD. At step 796, a determination is made regarding if the user has loaded a blank DVD. If the user has not loaded a blank DVD (step 797), the procedure returns to step 795. If the user has loaded a blank DVD, a check is made for a new DVD working directory (step 798). The procedure then returns to step 765. Steps 765-798 can be characterized collectively as DVD burning process steps.
Automatic DVD Disc-Image Back-Up
In various embodiments, the system's hard drive 80 is formatted with a separate partition that is reserved for making mirror images of DVD discs. A typical DVD RW disc is 4.7 GB. As the system is creating a DVD disc, the system makes an exact duplicate of the entire disc on the hard drive 80 in a separate partition. An administrator or user can select how many back-up copies of DVDs the system retains.
As the user continues to create new DVDs, the oldest hard-drive backup will be overwritten; thus, if the user selected three back-up images, by the time the user creates the fourth DVD, the oldest one is being overwritten with a mirror image of the number four disc. Using this feature, if an original DVD is lost, unreadable, or intentionally destroyed, a supervisor can go back and create an exact copy of the same DVD disc.
Video Data Security
Since the system's video files are typically in MPEG-2 format, the files could conceivably be manipulated using video-editing tools. In litigation, attorneys could attempt bring into question the authenticity of the MPEG files, suggesting that they could be exported, manipulated, and then re-inserted onto the disc. The system thus uses checksums in some embodiments to ensure that the files have not been manipulated or edited.
First Level of Security—The Self-Verifying Checksum Result
When the system is ready to close a DVD disc (e.g., just prior to disc ejection), the system performs a checksum calculation on the disc contents and writes that result into a hidden and/or encrypted file saved on the DVD disc. By using a video utility, the DVD disc can be analyzed to see if a checksum result from the disc's contents matches the result of the hidden (and/or encrypted) checksum result on that DVD disc. This process verifies that the disc content matches the checksum file.
Second Level of Security—System Verification of the Hidden (or Encrypted) Checksum Files
The system also provides a method to verify that the checksum file that is hidden on a DVD disc has not been recreated to match a manipulated disc. This is done by comparing subsequently-recorded DVD discs (e.g., discs recorded using the same system) to the DVD disc in question. The system automatically generates a unique disc serial number for each DVD disc it records. This serial number is written onto the DVD disc and is also saved into a log file in the system's non-volatile memory. When a DVD disc is closed, the checksum result of that DVD disc is also written to the log file in the system's non-volatile memory.
The log file preferably contains the serial number and checksum result of every DVD disc that that specific system has authored. The entire contents of the log files that are stored on the system's non-volatile memory may then be copied onto every DVD disc the system creates. Every DVD disc created by a specific system can be used to verify the validity of a checksum result contained on any other DVD disc previously recorded by the same system.
Covert Recording Mode
In various embodiments of the present invention, the system has the ability to be placed into a covert-recording mode. In this mode, the system has the appearance of being powered off. However, it is actually recording data, such as video and audio, on the hard drive 80. The covert-recording mode permits events inside a patrol car to be recorded without a suspect being aware that he is being recorded. A record trigger is generated when the system is placed into covert-recording mode. However, the system will only archive to the DVD after the system has been taken out of covert recording mode to prevent the DVD drive noise from giving an indication that the system is not actually powered off.
In an illustrative example of placing the system into covert recording mode, a user presses and holds a power OFF key for more than 2 seconds. A sound indicates that the unit has been placed into covert recording mode and all lights, backlights, indicators, and displays are turned off. This gives the appearance to a back-seat occupant that the unit is turned off. The system automatically selects an interior camera input to be recorded. The covert mode is ended by pressing POWER ON or a STOP key. At that time, the system lights, backlights, indicators, and displays are turned on, and the video that has been marked for recording will be archived to the DVD disc.
Various embodiments of the invention may reside in a computer system. Here, the term “computer system” is to be understood to include at least a memory and a processor. In general, the memory will store, at one time or another, at least portions of an executable program code, and the processor will execute one or more of the instructions included in that executable program code. It will be appreciated that the term “executable program code” and the term “software” mean substantially the same thing for the purposes of this description. It is not necessary to the practice of this invention that the memory and the processor be physically located in the same place. That is to say, it is foreseen that the processor and the memory might be in different physical pieces of equipment or even in geographically distinct locations.
Various embodiments of the invention may also be embodied in a computer program product, as will now be explained. On a practical level, the software that enables the computer system to perform the operations described further below in detail, may be supplied on any one of a variety of media. Furthermore, the actual implementation of the approach and operations of the invention are actually statements written in a programming language. Such programming language statements, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to act in accordance with the particular content of the statements. Furthermore, the software that enables a computer system to act in accordance with the invention may be provided in any number of forms including, but not limited to, original source code, assembly code, object code, machine language, compressed or encrypted versions of the foregoing, and any and all equivalents.
One of skill in the art will appreciate that “media”, or “computer-readable media”, as used here, may include a diskette, a tape, a compact disc, an integrated circuit, a ROM, a CD, a cartridge, a remote transmission via a communications circuit, or any other similar medium useable by computers. For example, to supply software for enabling a computer system to operate in accordance with the invention, the supplier might provide a diskette or might transmit the software in some form via satellite transmission, via a direct telephone link, or via the Internet. Thus, the term, “computer readable medium” is intended to include all of the foregoing and any other medium by which software may be provided to a computer.
Although the enabling software might be “written on” a diskette, “stored in” an integrated circuit, or “carried over” a communications circuit, it will be appreciated that, for the purposes of this application, the computer usable medium will be referred to as “bearing” the software. Thus, the term “bearing” is intended to encompass the above and all equivalent ways in which software may be associated with a computer usable medium.
For the sake of simplicity, therefore, the term “program product” is thus used to refer to a computer useable medium, as defined above, which bears in any form of software to enable a computer system to operate according to the above-identified invention. Thus, the invention may also be embodied in a program product bearing software that enables a computer to perform management of information according to the invention.
In the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features may be grouped together into a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiment(s) of the invention require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all the features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus, the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separate embodiment of the invention.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/249,662, filed on Oct. 12, 2005. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/249,662 claims priority from U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/617,988, filed on Oct. 12, 2004. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/249,662 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/617,988 are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3752047 | Gordon et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4258421 | Juhasz et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4389706 | Gomola et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4420238 | Felix | Dec 1983 | A |
4688244 | Hannon et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4754255 | Sanders et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4786900 | Karasawa et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4789904 | Peterson | Dec 1988 | A |
4831438 | Bellman, Jr. et al. | May 1989 | A |
4843463 | Michetti | Jun 1989 | A |
4949186 | Peterson | Aug 1990 | A |
4992943 | McCracken | Feb 1991 | A |
4993068 | Piosenka et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5027104 | Reid | Jun 1991 | A |
5111289 | Lucas et al. | May 1992 | A |
5136655 | Bronson | Aug 1992 | A |
5164827 | Paff | Nov 1992 | A |
5185667 | Zimmermann | Feb 1993 | A |
5204536 | Vardi | Apr 1993 | A |
5225882 | Hosokawa et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5430431 | Nelson | Jul 1995 | A |
5485611 | Astle | Jan 1996 | A |
5491464 | Carter et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5491511 | Odle | Feb 1996 | A |
5515042 | Nelson | May 1996 | A |
5539454 | Williams | Jul 1996 | A |
5570127 | Schmidt | Oct 1996 | A |
5579239 | Freeman et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5651075 | Frazier et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5677979 | Squicciarini et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682133 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689442 | Swanson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5703604 | McCutchen | Dec 1997 | A |
5708780 | Levergood et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5726450 | Peterson et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734337 | Kupersmit | Mar 1998 | A |
5742336 | Lee | Apr 1998 | A |
5784023 | Bluege | Jul 1998 | A |
5787367 | Berra | Jul 1998 | A |
5799083 | Brothers et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5809161 | Auty et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815093 | Kikinis | Sep 1998 | A |
5818864 | van Goor | Oct 1998 | A |
5844599 | Hildin | Dec 1998 | A |
5852664 | Iverson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5857159 | Dickrell et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5890079 | Levine | Mar 1999 | A |
5898866 | Atkins et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5917405 | Joao | Jun 1999 | A |
5920338 | Katz | Jul 1999 | A |
5926210 | Hackett et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936683 | Lin | Aug 1999 | A |
5963248 | Ohkawa et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6008841 | Charlson | Dec 1999 | A |
6028528 | Lorenzetti et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6037977 | Peterson | Mar 2000 | A |
6076026 | Jambhekar et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092008 | Bateman | Jul 2000 | A |
6121898 | Moetteli | Sep 2000 | A |
6141611 | Mackey et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6151065 | Steed et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6211907 | Scaman et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215519 | Nayar et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6252989 | Geisler et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6259475 | Ramachandran et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6282462 | Hopkins | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6326714 | Bandera | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330025 | Arazi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6332193 | Glass et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335789 | Kikuchi | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6345219 | Klemens | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6373962 | Kanade et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389340 | Rayner | May 2002 | B1 |
6421080 | Lambert | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430488 | Goldman et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6445824 | Hieda | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6456321 | Ito et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6490513 | Fish et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6518881 | Monroe | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6542076 | Joao | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6545601 | Monroe | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546119 | Ciolli et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6546363 | Hagenbuch | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6553131 | Neubauer et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556905 | Mittelsteadt et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6559769 | Anthony et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6631522 | Erdelyi | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6636256 | Passman et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6684137 | Takagi et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6696978 | Trajkovic et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6704281 | Hourunranta et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6707489 | Maeng et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6734911 | Lyons | May 2004 | B1 |
6754663 | Small et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801574 | Takeuchi et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6812835 | Ito et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831556 | Boykin | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6950013 | Scaman et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6950122 | Mirabile | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6959122 | McIntyre | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6965400 | Haba et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7023913 | Monroe | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7119674 | Sefton | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7119832 | Blanco et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7131136 | Monroe | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7180407 | Guo et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7190882 | Gammenthaler | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7215876 | Okada et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7262790 | Bakewell | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7272179 | Siemens et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7363742 | Nerheim | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7373395 | Brailean et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7382244 | Donovan et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7405834 | Marron et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7471334 | Stenger | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7495579 | Sirota et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7570158 | Denny et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7570476 | Nerheim | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7574131 | Chang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583290 | Enright et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7646312 | Rosen | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7702015 | Richter et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711150 | Simon | May 2010 | B2 |
7768548 | Silvernail et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7787025 | Sanno et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7804426 | Etcheson | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7880766 | Aoki et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7894632 | Park et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7920187 | Sanno et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7929010 | Narasimhan | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7944676 | Smith et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7973853 | Ojima et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7995652 | Washington | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8022874 | Frieaizen | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8037348 | Wei et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8050206 | Siann et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8446469 | Blanco et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8594485 | Brundula | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8805431 | Vasavada et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8819686 | Memik et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8837901 | Shekarri et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
9058499 | Smith | Jun 2015 | B1 |
9134338 | Cilia et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9325950 | Haler | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9331997 | Smith | May 2016 | B2 |
9377161 | Hanchett et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9432298 | Smith | Aug 2016 | B1 |
20010052137 | Klein | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020040475 | Yap et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020064314 | Comaniciu et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020135679 | Scaman | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020140924 | Wangler et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020141618 | Ciolli et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020141650 | Keeney et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149476 | Ogura | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020180759 | Park et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020183905 | Maeda et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186148 | Trajkovic et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030025599 | Monroe | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030025812 | Slatter | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030052798 | Hanson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071891 | Geng | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030080878 | Kirmuss | May 2003 | A1 |
20030086000 | Siemens et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030095338 | Singh et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030112133 | Webb et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030142209 | Yamazaki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030151663 | Lorenzetti et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154009 | Basir et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172123 | Polan et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030185419 | Sumitomo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210329 | Aagaard et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210806 | YoichiShintani | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030212567 | Shintani et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030214585 | Bakewell | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040008255 | Lewellen | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040017930 | Kim et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021852 | DeFlumere | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040056779 | Rast | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040080615 | Klein et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040096084 | Tamoto et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040119869 | Tretter et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040150717 | Page et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040189804 | Borden et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201765 | Gammenthaler | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040218099 | Washington | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040221311 | Dow et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040223058 | Richter et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252193 | Higgins | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040258149 | Robinson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050083404 | Pierce et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090961 | Bonk et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050099273 | Shimomura et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050100329 | Lao et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050101334 | Brown et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050128064 | Riesebosch | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050151671 | Bortolotto | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050151852 | Jomppanen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050196140 | Moteki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050206773 | Kim et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050212912 | Huster | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050243171 | Ross et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050258942 | Manasseh et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060010199 | Brailean et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060012683 | Lao et al. | Jan 2006 | A9 |
20060028547 | Chang | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033813 | Provinsal et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060098843 | Chew | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126932 | Eschbach | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060132604 | Lao et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060133476 | Page et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060152636 | Matsukawa et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060158968 | Vanman et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060159325 | Zeineh et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060187305 | Trivedi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060193384 | Boyce | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060209189 | Simpson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060244826 | Chew | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060269265 | Wright et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060274166 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070013776 | Venetianer et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070024706 | Brannon et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070029825 | Franklin et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070035612 | Korneluk et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058856 | Boregowda et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070069921 | Sefton | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070097212 | Farneman | May 2007 | A1 |
20070109411 | Jung et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122000 | Venetianer et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070188612 | Carter | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200933 | Watanabe et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070217761 | Chen et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070219686 | Plante | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070221233 | Kawano et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222678 | Ishio et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222859 | Chang et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225550 | Gattani et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070230943 | Chang et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260363 | Miller | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070268370 | Sanno et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070274705 | Kashiwa et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070291104 | Petersen et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070296817 | Ebrahimi et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002028 | Miyata | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080007438 | Segall et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080036580 | Breed | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080100705 | Kister et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129844 | Cusack et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167001 | Wong | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080175479 | Sefton et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080218596 | Hoshino | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080240616 | Haering et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080285803 | Madsen | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080301088 | Landry et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002491 | Haler | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090046157 | Cilia et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090049491 | Karonen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090088267 | Shimazaki et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090102950 | Ahiska | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090129672 | Camp, Jr. et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090195655 | Pandey | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207248 | Cilia et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090207252 | Raghunath | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213218 | Cilia et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090237529 | Nakagomi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090251530 | Cilia | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259865 | Sheynblat et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090295919 | Chen et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090300692 | Mavlankar et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090320081 | Chui et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100026802 | Titus et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100118147 | Dorneich et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100165109 | Lang | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100208068 | Elsemore | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100225817 | Sheraizin et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100238327 | Griffith et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100245568 | Wike, Jr. et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265331 | Tanaka | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100321183 | Donovan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110042462 | Smith | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053654 | Petrescu et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110074580 | Mercier et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110110556 | Kawakami | May 2011 | A1 |
20110134141 | Swanson et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157376 | Lyu et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110234749 | Alon | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110242277 | Do et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110249153 | Hirooka et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110267499 | Wan et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285845 | Bedros et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292287 | Washington | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110310435 | Tsuji et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120040650 | Rosen | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120092522 | Zhang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130150004 | Rosen | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130279757 | Kephart | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287090 | Sasaki et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130336634 | Vanman et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140059166 | Mann et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140139680 | Huang et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140192192 | Worrill et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140201064 | Jackson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140226952 | Cilia et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140240500 | Davies | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140355951 | Tabak | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150050923 | Tu et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150054639 | Rosen | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160073025 | Cilia | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20170215971 | Gattani et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20180103255 | Cilia et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
707297 | Apr 1996 | EP |
2698596 | Feb 1995 | FR |
2287152 | Sep 1995 | GB |
2317418 | Mar 1998 | GB |
2006311039 | Nov 2006 | JP |
1050897 | Jul 2011 | KR |
WO-1993020655 | Oct 1993 | WO |
WO-1994019212 | Sep 1994 | WO |
WO-1995028783 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO-1996022202 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO-1997038526 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-1998052358 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO-1999018410 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-01097524 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO-2004036926 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO-2007104367 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO-2013100933 | Jul 2013 | WO |
WO-2016089918 | Jun 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Copenheaver, Blaine R., International Search Report for PCT/US2009/032462 dated Mar. 10, 2009 (3 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/362,302, Andrew Cilia et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/095,107, Cilia. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/109,557, Cilia. |
Copenheaver, Blaine R., International Search Report for PCT/US2009/000930 dated Apr. 9, 2009, (4 pages). |
Young, Lee W., International Search Report for PCT/US2009/000934 dated Apr. 29, 2009, (3 pages). |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/694,931, Cilia. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/779,564, Vanman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/780,050, Vanman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/780,092, Vanman. |
Copenheaver, Blaine R., International Search Report for PCT/US2010030861 dated Jun. 21, 2010, (4 pages). |
Diep, Nhon T., International Search Report for PCT/US05/36701 dated Oct. 25, 2006 (5 pages). |
Kortum, P. et al., “Implementation of a foveated image coding system for image bandwidth reduction”, SPIE Proceedings, vol. 2657, 1996, pp. 350-360, XP-002636638. |
Geisler, Wilson S. et al., “A real-time foveated multiresolution system for low-bandwidth video communication”, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering SPIE—Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. USA, vol. 3299,1998, pp. 294-305, XP-002636639. |
Rowe, Lawrence A., et al.; “Indexes for User Access to Large Video Databases”; Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases II, IS&T/SPIE Symp. on Elec. Imaging Sci. & Tech.; San Jose, CA; Feb. 1994; 12 pages. |
Polybius; “The Histories,” vol. III: Books 5-8; Harvard University Press; 1923; pp. 385 & 387. |
Crisman, P.A. (editor); “The Compatible Time-Sharing System: A Programmer's Guide,” second edition; The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Massachusetts; 1965; 587 pages. |
Kotadia, Munir; “Gates Predicts Death of the Password”; http://www.cnet.com/news/gates-predicts-death-of-the-password/?ftag-CADe856116&bhid=; Feb. 25, 2004; 3 pages. |
Morris, Robert, et al.; “Password Security: A Case History”; Communications of the ACM, vol. 22, No. 11; Nov. 1979; pp. 594-597. |
Cranor, Lorrie Faith, et al.; “Security and Usability: Designing Secure Systems that People Can Use”; O'Reilly Media; Aug. 2005; pp. 3 & 104. |
Chirillo, John; “Hack Attacks Encyclopedia: A Complete History of Hacks, Cracks, Phreaks, and Spies Over Time”; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2001; 485-486. |
Stonebraker, Michael, et al.; “Object-Relational DBMSs: Tracking the Next Great Wave”; Second Ed.; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.; 1999; pp. 3, 173, 232-237, 260. |
Stonebraker, Michael, et al.; “Object-Relational DBMSs: The Next Great Wave”; Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc.; 1996; pp. 105, 107, 166-168. |
Barwick, Sandra; “Two Wheels Good, Four Wheels Bad”; The Independent; http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/two-wheels-good-four-wheels-bad-1392034.html; Feb. 4, 1994; 11 pages. |
McFee, John E., et al.; “Multisensor Vehicle-Mounted Teleoperated Mine Detector with Data Fusion”; SPIE Proceedings, vol. 3392; Apr. 13, 1998; 2 pages. |
Malcolm, Andrew H.; “Drunken Drivers Now Facing Themselves on Video Camera”; The New York Times; http://www.nytimes.com/1990/04/21/us/drunken-drivers-now-facing-themselves-on-video-camera.html; Apr. 21, 1990; 3 pages. |
Kaplan, A.E., et al.; “An Internet Accessible Telepresence”; Multimedia Systems, vol. 5, Issue 2; Mar. 1997; Abstract only; 2 pages. |
Sabatini, Richard V.; “State Police Cars in Pa. Get Cameras Patrol Stops Will be Videotaped. The Units will Benefit Citizens and Police, Authorities Say”; http://articles.philly.com/1996-03-30/news/25637501_1_patrol-car-state-police-commissioner-paul-j-evanko; Mar. 30, 1996; 2 pages. |
Stockton, Gregory R., et al.; “Why Record? (Infrared Video)”; Infraspection Institute's IR/INFO '98 Symposium, Orlando, Florida; Jan. 25-28, 1998; 5 pages. |
Racepak LLC; “Racepak DataLink Software” http://www.racepak.com/software.php.; Feb. 3, 2008; 4 pages. |
Pavlopoulos, S., et al.; “A Novel Emergency Telemedicine System Based on Wireless Communication Technology—Ambulance”; IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed, vol. 2, No. 4; Dec. 1998; Abstract only; 2 pages. |
Horne, Mike; “Future Video Accident Recorder”; http://www.iasa.com.au/folders/Publications/pdf_library/horne.pdf; May 1999; 9 pages. |
Townsend & Taphouse; “Microsentinel I”; http://www.blacksheepnetworks.com/security/resources/encyclopedia/products/prod19.htm; Jul. 5, 2003; 1 page. |
Security Data Networks, Inc.; “Best of Show Winner at CES Consumer Electronics Show is MicroSentinel(R) Wireless Internet Based Security System that Allows Users to Monitor their Home, Family, or Business using any Internet or E-Mail Connection”; PR Newswire; http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/best-of-show-winner-at-ces-consumer-electronics-show-is-microsentinelr-wireless-internet-based-security-system-that-allows-users-to-monitor-their-home-family-or-business-using-any-internet-or-e-mail-connection-73345197.html; Jan. 7, 1999; 3 pages. |
Draper, Electra; “Mission Possible for Loronix”; Denver Post; http://extras.denverpost.com/business/top100b.htm; Aug. 13, 2000; 2 pages. |
“Choosing the Right Password”; The Information Systems Security Monitor (ISSM); vol. 2, No. 2; Apr. 1992; 2 pages. |
Aref, Walid G., et al.; “A Video Database Management System for Advancing Video Database Research”; In Proc. of the Int Workshop on Management Information Systems; Nov. 2002; 10 pages. |
ICOP Extreme Wireless Mic, Operation Supplement. |
Raytheon JPS Communications, Ratheon Model 20/20-W, Raytheon 20/20 Vision Digital In-Car Video Systems. |
Product Review: ICOP Model 20/20-W. |
State of Utah Invitation to Bid State Cooperative Contract, Contract No. MA503. |
X26 Taser. |
Taser X26 Specification Sheet. |
Affidavit of Christopher Butler of Internet Archive attesting to the public availability of the 20/20-W Publication on Nov. 25, 2010. |
International Association of Chiefs of Police Digital Video System Minimum Specifications Nov. 21, 2008. |
Korean Patent Publication 1050897 (“Park”), with Certified Translation. |
City of Pomona Request for Proposal for Mobile Video Recording System for Police Vehicles. |
“Taser Int'l (TASR) Challenges to Digital Ally's (DGLY) Patents”, StreetInsider.com, http://www.streetinsider.com/Corporate+News/TASER+Intl+(TASER)+Challenges+to+Digital+Allys+(DGLY)+Patents/12302550 html Dec. 1, 2016. |
Japanese Patent Publication 2006311039-A (“Murakami”), with Machined Translation. |
ICOP Extreme Wireless Mic, Operation Supplement; 2008. |
Raytheon JPS Communications, Ratheon Model 20/20-W, Raytheon 20/20 Vision Digital In-Car Video Systems; Feb. 2010. |
Product Review: ICOP Model 20/20-W; May 19, 2009. |
State of Utah Invitation to Bid State Cooperative Contract, Contract No. MA503; Jul. 3, 2008. |
X26 Taser; date unknown. |
Taser X26 Specification Sheet; 2003. |
City of Pomona Request for Proposal for Mobile Video Recording System for Police Vehicles; Apr. 4, 2013. |
Carlier, Axel, et al.; “Combining Content-Based Analyis and Crowdsourcing to Improve User Interaction with Zoomable Video”; Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Multimedia 2011; Nov. 28-Dec. 1, 2011; pp. 43-52. |
Mavlankar, Aditya, et al.; “Region-of-Interest Prediction for Interactively Streaming Regions of High Resolution Video”; Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Packet Video Workshop; Nov. 2007; 10 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/481,214, Vanman et al. |
Cilia, Andrew, “U.S. Appl. No. 14/788,556”, filed Jun. 30, 2015. |
Sony Corporation; “Network Camera: User's Guide: Software Version 1.0: SNC-RZ25N/RZ25P”; 2004; 81 pages. |
Cilia, Andrew, “U.S. Appl. No. 13/489,615”, filed Jun. 6, 2012. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110044605 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60617988 | Oct 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11249662 | Oct 2005 | US |
Child | 12779492 | US |