1. Technical Field
The present invention pertains to sealing an entry to a structure to prevent intrusion of the elements (e.g., air and water) and, more particularly, but not by way of limitation, to a door and low profile door jamb sealing assembly that addresses both sealing of a space around the door from the passage of air and moisture and pressure equalization relative to outside air forces.
2. History of Related Art
The use of doors and door-frame assemblies in both residential and commercial buildings is a well-known, integral part of conventional building construction. It is also an area which must meet certain design and size limitations in order to allow disabled individuals to pass therethrough. The doors which permit passage or entry into a building from a space outside of the building are typically mounted within a door frame. Door-frame assemblies typically include a horizontal lower plate, also called a threshold or sill, a header, and two vertical members comprising the jamb. When closed, the door typically abuts against a door jamb stop on the vertical door jamb members and the header of the door-frame assembly. In its closed position within the vertical door jamb, the door is also positioned above a substantial portion of the sill member.
The combination of the header, vertical door jamb, and sill works together to perform multiple functions. The door-frame assembly provides structural support for, and surfaces for the pivotal swinging and sealing of, the door mounted thereto. A door-frame sill can raise the surface over which the door swings. A raised surface of the door-frame sill is designed to form a barrier to water infiltration beneath the door. In essence, it forms a dam which should hold back water infiltration. The header, vertical door jambs, and door-frame sill then function together to form a complete seal around the door which is designed to limit the infiltration of both air and moisture.
Prior-art door sealing systems have incorporated a variety of door-frame sill designs. Common styles of prior-art door-frame sills include elongated members which are formed into a variety of different shapes and sizes. These prior-art door-frame sills are typically adapted for positioning beneath swinging doors. Prior-alt door-frame sill designs generally include a first portion adapted for facing toward an interior of the building and a second portion facing outwardly toward an exterior of the building. The outwardly facing portion of the door-frame sill is generally designed to be a barrier to the passage of water beneath the door.
Door frames typically provide a requisite mounting for a door and surround the door's perimeter when the door is closed therein. Door frames are generally made of either wood or metal. Design parameters for door frames typically include width, length, cross-sectional shape, manner of securement to the surrounding building wall, and the manner of sealing three sides of the door with the jamb and header. The door-frame sill underlies the fourth, bottom side of the door, as referenced above.
To date, there have been various prior-art door sealing systems which have both advanced and improved the effectiveness of sealing a space around the edges of a door against the passage of air or moisture. One example of a prior-art door sealing system appears in U.S. Pat. No. 5,468,665. These prior-art door sealing systems often include gaskets and flanges which can be secured to the bottom of the door and/or to the door frame. While prior-art door sealing systems may be effective for some applications, it has been found that door assemblies used in buildings located in a high wind area, such as, for example, near the ocean, present even more difficult sealing problems.
To prevent the elements from penetrating the gap between the bottom of the door and the upper surface of the door-frame sill, a portion of the door-frame sill is usually raised above the level of the exterior landing approaching the door-frame sill, and raised above the structure's interior floor level. It is the rise of this door-frame sill that often causes the entry difficulties addressed by the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988, P.L. 100-430, 102 Stat. 1619, amended the Fair Housing Act of 1968 to extend its coverage to housing discrimination on the basis of handicap. The core of the amended statute's provisions relating to housing discrimination on the basis of handicap appears in Section 804(f), codified at 42 U.S.C. §3604(f), which includes a subsection 3604(f)(3)(B), making it unlawful to refuse to make reasonable accommodations to afford a handicapped person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling.
Many prior-art door-frame sills are made of wood or metal. A primary consideration in the design of these prior-art door-frame sills is the ability to allow passage and withstand repeated exposure to inclement weather, particularly blowing wind and water. Metal door-frame sills, as opposed to wood door-frame sills, are generally better suited for resisting prolonged exposure to moisture. Some prior-art metal door-frame sills are formed with a hollow space beneath them to reduce cost and overall weight. Design parameters for door-frame sills typically include, for example, length, width, and cross-sectional shape. Because of the guidelines in the ADA and Fair Housing Act, door-frame sills in buildings are required to have a sufficiently low profile to provide easy access for passage of individuals in wheelchairs and individuals using walkers, crutches, or canes.
Specifically, many prior-art door sealing systems are rendered ineffective by high winds. Also, various prior-art door-sealing systems fail to effectively seal the door against high winds and moisture at a point where the door and the door-frame sill come together. This is particularly true with door-frame sill heights as required by ADA regulations and the like. The Fair Housing Act Design Manual at page 4.12 recommends that builders use a solution other than raising the level of the door-frame sill to prevent penetration of the elements.
It would be advantageous to provide a door sealing system including a door-frame sill that provides an improved system for preventing moisture and air infiltration, particularly in environments where high winds blow moisture against the outside surface of the door, and which further facilitates drainage of any water infiltrated into internal areas of the door-frame sill to prevent subsequent infiltration into the building.
A system for impeding air or liquid penetration through an entry into the interior of a structure includes a door mounted to a door frame. The door frame includes at least one integral cavity. The system also includes a dual-sealing system between the door and the door frame. The dual-sealing system includes an inner seal and an outer seal. A drainage cavity is defined by a region bounded by the inner seal, the outer seal, the door, and the door frame. A gap is formed in the outer seal that permits equalization of pressure of the cavity with external atmospheric pressure.
A method of impeding infiltration of air or liquid through a structure entry includes providing a door mounted to a door frame comprising a door-frame cavity and an inner seal and an outer seal. A drainage cavity is defined by a region bounded by the inner seal, the outer seal, the door, and the door frame. The method also includes equalizing drainage-cavity pressure with external atmospheric pressure via at least one gap formed in the outer seal and draining liquid from the door-frame cavity via at least one weep hole formed in the door frame and interoperably coupled with the door-frame cavity.
A wheelchair-accessible structure-entry method includes mounting a gooseneck gasket to a threshold member of a door frame. The method includes, responsive to a door-flame-mounted door applying contact pressure against an upwardly extending J-shaped portion of the gooseneck gasket, the gooseneck gasket folding and forming a compression seal against the door-frame-mounted door. The method is further includes, responsive to a wheel applying rolling pressure to the gooseneck gasket, the gooseneck gasket deforming to permit the wheel to roll over the threshold member.
For a more complete understanding of the door sealing system of the present invention and in furtherance of the objects and advantages thereof, reference may now be had to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
Various embodiments of the invention will now be described more fully with reference to the accompanying drawings. The invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be constructed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, the embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. Wherever possible, the same reference numerals are used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or similar parts.
Referring first to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Still referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
In a typical embodiment, the rubber seal 61 as implemented in the door-sealing system performs two primary functions. First, the generally J-shaped portion extends upwardly and facing the door sash 30 so that, when the door sash 30 contacts the generally J-shaped portion and applies pressure thereto, the generally J-shaped portion of the rubber seal 61 folds and forms a compression seal against the door sash 30. In addition, when rolling pressure such as, for example, that applied by a wheelchair, is applied to the rubber seal 61, the rubber seal 61 deforms to permit the wheel to roll over the door-frame sill 22. Although the rubber seal 61 is described herein as being made of rubber, those having skill in the art will appreciate that any suitable material may be used without departing from principles of the invention.
It is believed that the operation and construction of the present invention will be apparent from the foregoing description. While various apparatus and methods shown or described above have been characterized as being applicable to channel water, various changes and modifications, including those related to channeling of other liquids, may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.
This patent application claims priority from, and incorporates by reference the entire disclosure of, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/962,494, filed on Jul. 30, 2007.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3384996 | Gilchrist et al. | May 1968 | A |
3961452 | Hubbard et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
4006573 | Biebuyck | Feb 1977 | A |
4008552 | Biebuyck | Feb 1977 | A |
4010671 | Hubbard et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4030260 | Sukolics et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4050201 | Hubbard et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4055917 | Coller | Nov 1977 | A |
4055923 | Biebuyck | Nov 1977 | A |
4119336 | Sparrevohn | Oct 1978 | A |
4194776 | Biebuyck | Mar 1980 | A |
4203255 | Naslund et al. | May 1980 | A |
4344254 | Varlonga | Aug 1982 | A |
4405165 | Johns | Sep 1983 | A |
4478444 | Kurz et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4553361 | Ralph | Nov 1985 | A |
4644717 | Biebuyck | Feb 1987 | A |
4658544 | McCarty | Apr 1987 | A |
4739561 | Mills | Apr 1988 | A |
4748771 | Lehnert et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4773193 | Biebuyck et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4891921 | Governale | Jan 1990 | A |
4899508 | Biebuyck | Feb 1990 | A |
4955521 | Michael | Sep 1990 | A |
5036637 | Biebuyck | Aug 1991 | A |
5046285 | Fratini, Jr. et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5056263 | Bies | Oct 1991 | A |
5058344 | Biebuyck | Oct 1991 | A |
5061022 | Meriwether | Oct 1991 | A |
5069358 | Avery, Jr. | Dec 1991 | A |
5088780 | Doherty | Feb 1992 | A |
5107622 | Fuchs et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5117587 | Doan | Jun 1992 | A |
5123874 | White, III | Jun 1992 | A |
5125196 | Moody | Jun 1992 | A |
5150544 | Burnett | Sep 1992 | A |
RE34184 | Baird et al. | Feb 1993 | E |
5186698 | Mason et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5192398 | Kress et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5197225 | Yff | Mar 1993 | A |
5238539 | Baird | Aug 1993 | A |
5241132 | McCormack | Aug 1993 | A |
5319882 | Biebuyck | Jun 1994 | A |
5325279 | Freelove et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5345733 | Brockman et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5350262 | Michaelis et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5352174 | Mason et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5437130 | Raynak | Aug 1995 | A |
5454192 | Adler et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5469665 | Biebuyck | Nov 1995 | A |
5480199 | Husting | Jan 1996 | A |
5522180 | Adler et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528865 | Johnson et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5543767 | Elenbaas | Aug 1996 | A |
5553419 | Jenkins, II | Sep 1996 | A |
5556515 | Giunta et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5577349 | Rissone | Nov 1996 | A |
5603810 | Michler | Feb 1997 | A |
5634303 | Ellingson | Jun 1997 | A |
5638639 | Goodman et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5658434 | Schlosser | Aug 1997 | A |
5670025 | Baird | Sep 1997 | A |
5704095 | Guenschel | Jan 1998 | A |
5706607 | Frey | Jan 1998 | A |
5720855 | Baird | Feb 1998 | A |
5785323 | Heinzen | Jul 1998 | A |
5791113 | Glowa et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5836118 | Thornton et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836424 | Allen | Nov 1998 | A |
5875660 | Olshausen | Mar 1999 | A |
5901510 | Ellingson | May 1999 | A |
5930955 | Biebuyck | Aug 1999 | A |
5943825 | Procton et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6012257 | Caplette | Jan 2000 | A |
6033247 | Gregory, II | Mar 2000 | A |
6058655 | Gravel | May 2000 | A |
6098355 | Li | Aug 2000 | A |
6116615 | Trehan | Sep 2000 | A |
6134854 | Stanchfield | Oct 2000 | A |
6170210 | Marts | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219971 | Headrick | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6250016 | Gravel | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266933 | Park | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6311435 | Brockman et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6381905 | Rissone | May 2002 | B1 |
6494064 | Pena | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6637158 | Bennett | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6652114 | Ancel | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658696 | Buckelew | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6826877 | Stradel | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6916406 | Baird | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6976716 | Lin | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7101064 | Ancel | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7140154 | Governale et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7275352 | Autovino et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20020112420 | Phomphakdy et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090038231 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60962494 | Jul 2007 | US |