Patent Application
20090139795
1. Field of Invention
This invention generally relates to a conventional process whereby a sound suppressor constructed from wieldable materials is assembled, and in particular when and inner tube containing baffles, mount and end cap are secured to an outer tube.
2. Prior Art
Previous systems exist for assembling sound suppressors. A number of sound suppressor devices exist which use a tube to contain baffles. Welding is not commonly used to secure the baffles to the tube. The end cap and mount for the sound suppressors are often threadedly secured to the tube which serves as the body for the sound suppressor device. All of these designs lack the strength necessary to meet the standards of the United States Armed Forces.
The standard arm of the US military is the M16/M4 rifle. This firearm uses the NATO standard 5.56 mm cartridge. The 5.56 NATO cartridge can generate 78,000 PSI and raise the temperature of a rifle sound suppressor being fired full automatic to a temperature exceeding 1000 degree Fahrenheit if enough rounds are discharged. A typical way to produce a sound suppressor capable of handling such high heat and pressure is to increase the material thickness of the sound suppressor tube and possibly the baffles.
Increasing material thickness adds weight to the end of a rifle barrel which can have a negative effect on accuracy. Additional weight on the end of a firearm barrel is another down side from the end user perspective who needs to be able to raise and fire the firearm rapidly.
Designs which are assembled with a tube wall thickness which is to thin and are not welded properly will self destruct. Typically this destruction merely renders the sound suppressor useless but in some instances it can cause the sound suppressor to block the aperture through the sound suppressor which a discharged projectile is supposed to pass. The result is poor accuracy at best, but the possibility of rendering the firearm inoperable is present.
Threads which are commonly used as a means of securing a rifle silencer create points of weakness where the individual items are threadedly secured. Circumferential fusion welds eliminate the need to threadedly secure the tube and noise suppressor together.
Other weapons such as the US military M249 SAW will create failure with improperly assembled sound suppressor very rapidly due to the high rate of fire such weapons are designed to provide.
My design provides for a novel process of assemble for a sound suppressor and particularly a sound suppressor intended to be used with a firearm capable of full automatic fire.
A superior means of assembly can be had if the sound suppressor comprises an inner tube which is made up of the front end cap, mount, baffles and spacers all welded together to form the inner core. This inner core is essentially the sound suppressor. An additional outer core is then slid over the inner core and secured by welds to the front end cap and mount. This design allows the outer tube to be half the thickness necessary of other designs because the spacers and baffle when welded as a full assembly provide a solid wall. Effectively the wall of the silencer is layered to help slow down the build up of heat between the two layers of metal and to full take advantage of the strength which the spacers provide to the structure of the sound suppressor. A key element to this assembly process is circumferential welds. Full penetration, circumferential welds are provided on all mating surfaces between the front end cap, each spacer, mount and each baffle. The outer tube is then circumferential welded to the front end cap and mount. The end result is a reduced wall thickness as compared to other designs, and a sound suppressor capably of handling heat and pressure far in excess of its counter parts on the market.
3. Objects and Advantages
Accordingly several objects and advantages of the present invention are
Still further objects and advantages will become apparent from a consideration of the ensuing description and drawings.
In general terms the present inventions provides a method of assembling a sound suppressor which allows for reducing relative material thickness while increasing the structural strength of the design. The method described will work with any design which utilizes materials that may be welded or ferruminates. The end user of a product which utilizes my described method will have a lighter weight sound suppressor which will be capable of containing higher pressures at higher temperatures while at the same time being lighter than other conventionally assembled sound suppressors.
Specifically my method affords several key advantages over other more conventional methods of assembly. Using circumferential welds to secure about the edge each pieces of the internal silencer core creates a complete assembly. Full penetration welds effectively bind the metal creating a single unit. The internals consist of a mount, end cap and a series of spacers and baffles depending on the preferred configuration of the manufacturer. Once this internal assembly is completed a tube is slid over the out side. This tube is them circumferentially welded about the mount and end cap to secure the tube in place. By assembling the sound suppressor in this manner the wall thickness of material around the blast chamber of the silencer may be cut in half, while the wall thickness around the tertiary chamber may be reduced by 75%. This creates a lighter weight assembly which is as structurally strong as the conventional designs not assembled in this manner.
Material wall thickness may be reduced for several reasons. Fusion welding the baffles, spacers, mounts and end cap into a single assembly eliminates all gaps between each individual part rendering the sum of all parts as a single unit. This single unit assists in containing the pressures generated from the discharging firearm. When the fore mentioned assembly has an outer tube placed about it the combined thickness of the internal assembly and tube will strengthen the unit as a whole. Designs which do not circumferentially fusion weld the internals are loosing the strength of the internal material and are in fact relying almost exclusively on the wall thickness of the tube.
The novel features believed to be characteristic of the invention, together with further advantages thereof, will be better understood from the following description considered in connection with the accompanying drawings in which a preferred embodiment of the present invention is illustrated by way of example. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for the purpose of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention.
As used herein, the word “front” or “forward” corresponds to the firing direction of the noise suppressor (i.e., to the right as shown in
Turning now to the drawings in which like reference characters indicate corresponding elements throughout the several views, attention is directed to
In
In
My method is designed to form the inner components of a noise suppressor into a fully welded baffle core 2. Once completed the gaps present between the spacers, mount, front end cap, and baffles are no longer points of weakness. Since the tube 10 is no longer solely responsible for containing the pressures of a discharging firearm the out side diameter of the tube 10 may be reduced. This reduction in diameter reduces the overall weight of the fully welded noise suppressor 1.
Full penetration, circumferential welds are used to bond all connecting surfaces of each spacer 4, mount 3, end cap 6, baffle 5, and tube 10. To achieve the proper weld penetration and to produce an aesthetically pleasing weld a robotic lathe welder is used.
The fully welded baffle core 2 is superior to spot welded baffle cores because the entire mating surface of each internal component of the noise suppressor 1 is fully welded. With each baffle 5, spacer 4, tube 10, and mount 3 circumferentially welded to one another dependency of a limited plurality of strong points is eliminated. Circumferential welds better distribute the burden of restraining the noise suppressors' internal part. Spot welds leave the possibility of one weld failing and causing the internals of the noise suppressor to collapse. This scenario is less likely to happen with full penetration, circumferential welds.
The tube 10 has an inside diameter of sufficient size as to contain the assembled and welded baffle core 2. Full penetration, circumferential welds are used to secure the tube 10 to the baffle core 10 about the front where the front end cap 6 protrudes from the tube 10 and in the rear where the mount 3 and tube 10 meet. Using welds to hold the tube 10 and baffle core 2 together is superior to the common method of threadedly secure an end cap 6 and mount 3 into the front and rear of a tube 10. The threads mandate that the tube wall thickness be at least 50% greater than is necessary for my method of assembly. The threads are also weaker than the full penetration, circumferential welds afforded by my method.
Accordingly the reader will see that, according to the invention, I have provided a method for assembling a noise suppressor which will allow for a reduction in material wall thickness without compromising the strength and integrity of a noise suppressor. Further it can be seen that my method will allow for a noise suppressor to operate at higher pressures and temperatures due to the unique assembly method described. Also shown is a method of assembly which does not reply of threadedly securing a front end cap and mount to a tube in order to contain the noise suppressor's internals.
While my above drawings and description contain many specificities, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the invention, but rather as an exemplification of one preferred embodiment thereof. For example, my method is not limited to designs which us cone baffles, but rather can be incorporated into any noise suppressor design where the parts making up the internals have a similar out side diameter, and are produced from a wieldable material.
Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined not by the embodiments illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.”
