This application claims all benefits accruing under 35 U.S.C. §119 from China Patent Application 201410231145.2, filed on May 29, 2014 in the China Intellectual Property Office, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
1. Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to a method of calculating available output power of the wind farm, especially for a method of calculating the available output power of large-scale wind farm (above 30 MW) based on the empirical orthogonal function (EOF) in the natural state.
2. Description of the Related Art
With the rapid development of wind farm industry, the installed wind power capacity in the power network operation has reached 100 million kilowatts. There is an obvious case of brownouts with the limit of power transmission capacity and the ability of consumptive. Currently, the amount of abandoned wind power is generally calculated by annual generating capacity of wind turbines in theory, and the available output power is calculated based on the amount of abandoned wind power. However, the result is very different from the actual.
What is needed, therefore, is a method of calculating available output power of the wind farm that can overcome the above-described shortcomings.
Many aspects of the embodiments can be better understood with reference to the following drawings. The components in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale, the emphasis instead being placed upon clearly illustrating the principles of the embodiments. Moreover, in the drawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
The disclosure is illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings in which like references indicate similar elements. It should be noted that references to “an” or “one” embodiment in this disclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and such references mean at least one.
Referring to FIGURE, a method of calculating available output power of the wind farm comprises following steps:
step S10, obtaining a space vector Vk by decomposing a power sequence of benchmarking wind turbines in a wind farm based on empirical orthogonal function;
step S20, calculating a typical power sequence P of benchmarking wind turbines by restoring the space vector Vk;
step S30, getting a total power Ptotal of a feeder on which the benchmarking wind turbines is operated by enlarging a typical power of each benchmarking wind turbine in proportion according to the number of the benchmarking wind turbines operated on the feeder;
step S40, obtaining an output power Pestimate of the wind farm by accumulating the total power Ptotal of all the benchmarking wind turbines.
In step S10, the power sequence of benchmarking wind turbines in the wind farm can be obtained through the available output power of the wind farm in one year. The power sequence is defined through the number of benchmarking wind turbines and a time sequence. The number of benchmarking wind turbines is set for m, and the time sequence of each of the benchmarking wind turbines is set for n based on the available output power of the wind farm in one year. According to EOF, the wind farm can be abstracted as a space field with m-dimensional random variable X, and a plurality of samples with a capacity of n are obtained in the space field. The plurality of samples are defined as Xi(1≦i≦n). Xi is an m-dimensional vector representing the benchmarking wind turbines. The Xi is denoted as follows:
Xt=(x1t,x2t, . . . ,xmt)T, t=1,2, . . . ,n; (1)
According to EOF decomposition form, formula (1) can be expressed as follows:
wherein Vk is the unknown m dimensional space vector, εt is an m dimension error vector corresponding to the Vk, αk(t) is a time factor, which is a weighting factor while the kth space vector Vk represents Xt.
The space vector Vk can be obtained by following substeps:
Step S11, obtaining a first space vector V1, wherein a residual error sum of squares E1 of the formula:
Xt=α1(t)V1+εt (3)
is smallest.
The residual error sum of squares E1 can be expressed as:
wherein α1(t)=XtTV1 or α1(t)=V1TXt, α1(t)=0, and V1TV1=1.
The residual error sum of squares E1 can further be expressed as:
wherein
is a total variance expressed as VarX which is depended on the spatial field of space research field and independent of V1 and α1(t), then there are:
E1=VarX−Varα1 (6)
The Varα1 can be represented with X and V1, thus:
Varα1=α1(t)α1(t)=V1TXtXtTV1=V1TXtXtTV1 (7)
wherein, the element on the i line and the j column of the XtXtT can be expressed as xitxjt is a covariance of i and j's grid points sequence. The XtXtT is a covariance matrix:
Σ=(XtXtT) (8)
Furthermore, the residual error sum of squares E1 can be expressed as:
E1=VarX−V1TΣV1 (9)
Step S12, calculating the minimum value of E1 and the V1 corresponding to the minimum value of E1 under the condition of V1TV1=1.
The minimum value of E1 and the V1 can be obtained through Lagrangian method, which is expressed as:
F(v11,v21, . . . ,vm1)=F(V1)=VarX−V1TΣV1+λ(V1TV1−1) (10).
Through the derivation function, then:
Making it to zero vector, then:
ΣV1=λV1 (12).
Thus V1 is an eigenvector of the covariance matrix Σ, and λ is a Lagrange multiplier, which is an eigenvalues corresponding to the eigenvector V1.
Taking the formula (12) into the formula (9):
In order to get the minimum E1, a maximum eigenvalue λ1 of the eigenvalue λ is selected, which is expressed as λ=λ1. Thus V1 is the eigenvector corresponding to the maximum eigenvalue λ1.
Then:
Step S13, calculating variance contribution rate η.
A variance contribution Qk of the space vector Vk is a total number of the error variance which is reduced in the space field after the space vector Vk is added into the expansion of formula (9). The variance contribution Qk can be obtained:
Furthermore, because the total variance of the space field is expressed as
thus the variance contribution rate η is:
The variance contribution rate η reflects the space-based capabilities to the original description of the space field, the greater the variance contribution rate η, the closer between the space filed which is reduced from the space vector and the original space field. A typical space vector V can be determined by the variance contribution rate η.
In step S20, the threshold of the variance contribution rate η is defined as 95% to obtain the typical space vector V. The typical space vector V under the variance contribution rate η and the time factor α can be expressed as:
V=(b1,b2,b3, . . . bm) (17).
Thus the typical power sequence P of each benchmark wind turbine is:
P=α(b1,b2,b3, . . . ,bm) (18).
In step S30, a feeder series of the benchmarking wind turbines which are switched on in the number of m are defined as c1, c2, c3, . . . , cm, thus a transposed number of the feeder series is defined as C:
C=(c1,c2,c3, . . . ,cm)T (19).
Then a total power of the feeder Ptotal on which the benchmarking wind turbines is operated is expressed as:
In step S40, the output power Pestimate of the whole wind farm can be obtained by summing the all components of the total power of the feeder Ptotal in the formula (20):
Pestimate=αb1c1+αb2c2+αb3c3+ . . . +αbmcm (21).
The method of calculating available output power of wind farm has following advantages. First, the method of calculating available output power takes advantages of the EOF in mining characteristics and generality of each benchmarking turbines, and the random sequences in the decomposition can be destructed and superposed. Second, the large calculation error in calculating the theoretical generating capacity of the wind farm in the natural state can be overcome, and the calculation accuracy of the theoretical generating capacity can be improved. Third, the method can provide an important reference to assess the economic losses of brownouts or overhaul.
Depending on the embodiment, certain of the steps of methods described may be removed, others may be added, and that order of steps may be altered. It is also to be understood that the description and the claims drawn to a method may include some indication in reference to certain steps. However, the indication used is only to be viewed for identification purposes and not as a suggestion as to an order for the steps.
It is to be understood that the above-described embodiments are intended to illustrate rather than limit the disclosure. Variations may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit of the disclosure as claimed. It is understood that any element of any one embodiment is considered to be disclosed to be incorporated with any other embodiment. The above-described embodiments illustrate the scope of the disclosure but do not restrict the scope of the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2014 1 0231145 | May 2014 | CN | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4203116 | Lewin | May 1980 | A |
7116010 | Lasseter | Oct 2006 | B2 |
20040051387 | Lasseter | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20120004867 | Mousavi | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120004869 | Saarinen | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120010830 | Saarinen | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20150200455 | Venkateswaran | Jul 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150345474 A1 | Dec 2015 | US |