The present invention relates to counterfeit media detection.
It is important to be able to detect counterfeit media when such media is deposited into a self-service terminal, such as when counterfeit banknotes are inserted into an automated teller machine (ATM) equipped with automated banknote validation technology. Such automated banknote validation technology typically includes high resolution line sensors. These sensors are expensive.
There is now a requirement to detect counterfeit banknotes as they are being dispensed from ATMs. This requirement has arisen because some ATM replenishers have been accessing currency cassettes to be inserted into an ATM and fraudulently substituting counterfeit banknotes for valid banknotes in those currency cassettes.
It is not practical to include banknote validation technology in every ATM because such technology is expensive and would significantly increase the transaction time for each currency dispense transaction.
It would be advantageous to have a low-cost banknote validator that does not significantly increase transaction time.
Accordingly, the invention generally provides methods, systems, apparatus, and software for media validation, the apparatus comprising: a plurality of discrete sensors distributed along a transport path, and a controller operable to receive signals from the plurality of discrete sensors and to make a decision on validity of a transported media item based on the received signals.
In addition to the Summary of Invention provided above and the subject matter disclosed below in the Detailed Description, the following paragraphs of this section are intended to provide further basis for alternative claim language for possible use during prosecution of this application, if required. If this application is granted, some aspects may relate to claims added during prosecution of this application, other aspects may relate to claims deleted during prosecution, other aspects may relate to subject matter never claimed. Furthermore, the various aspects detailed hereinafter are independent of each other, except where stated otherwise. Any claim corresponding to one aspect should not be construed as incorporating any element or feature of the other aspects unless explicitly stated in that claim.
According to a first aspect there is provided a media handler for detecting counterfeit media, the media handler comprising: a plurality of discrete sensors distributed along a transport path operable to transport a media item, and a controller operable to receive signals from the plurality of discrete sensors and to make a decision on validity of the transported media item based on the received signals.
The transport path may comprise a banknote dispense path operable to pick media items from a currency cassette and to dispense those picked media items to a customer. The discrete sensors may be distributed along a transport path between (i) a pick area adjacent a pick unit, and (ii) a media item divert area in the vicinity of (or adjacent to) a purge container. The discrete sensors may not all be housed within a single module. This allows the sensors to be moved relative to each other, so that each media handler does not sense the same part of a media item as other media handlers of the same design. This ensures that counterfeiters cannot merely provide a genuine portion of a media item at a location on the media item corresponding to the position of the discrete sensors.
Optionally, the transport path may comprise a banknote deposit path operable to receive media items from a customer and to deposit those received media items into a media item container.
Optionally, the transport path may comprise a bi-directional banknote dispense and deposit path operable to receive media items from a customer and to dispense media items to a customer.
The discrete sensors may comprise two or more of the following types of discrete sensor: a UV sensor, an IR sensor, a sensor generally operable in a green portion of the electro-magnetic visible spectrum, a sensor generally operable in a red portion of the electro-magnetic visible spectrum, a sensor generally operable in a blue portion of the electro-magnetic visible spectrum, and an ultrasonic sensor.
The discrete sensors may comprise spot sensors (as opposed to line sensors that are typically more expensive).
The discrete sensors may sense transmission through, or reflection from, the media item.
The discrete sensors may be offset laterally from each other so that each discrete sensor senses a different portion of a surface of the media item.
One or more of the discrete sensors may be used instead of a track sensor so that the discrete sensor is used to indicate if a transported media item is present or skewed.
A discrete ultrasonic sensor may be used as part of the discrete sensor arrangement and also to detect multiple media item picks being transported as a single media item.
The controller may be operable to divert the transported media item if any of the discrete sensors indicates that the media item does not correspond to a valid media item. Since counterfeit banknotes inserted into a currency cassette are typically very low quality, the sensors may be used to detect the presence or absence of the appropriate radiation (for example, if infra-red is absorbed or not, or if ultra-violet is absorbed or not).
Alternatively, the controller may be operable to aggregate the signals received from the discrete sensors and apply artificial intelligence (using, for example, fuzzy logic, an artificial neural network, or the like) to ascertain if the media item is counterfeit.
Each of the discrete sensors may comprise a circuit board on which is mounted a transmitter and receiver. The transmitter and receiver may be integrated into a single device (for example, a transceiver), or implemented as two (or more) devices (for example, each discrete sensor may comprise a transmitter/receiver pair, or may comprise more transmitters than receivers, or vice versa).
According to a second aspect there is provided a method of detecting counterfeit media, the method comprising: picking a media item from a media item container; sensing the media item at a first position on a transport path using a first circuit; transporting the media item; sensing the media item at a second position on a transport path using a second circuit; transporting the media item; sensing the media item at a third position on a transport path using a third circuit; and diverting the media item to a reject container (also called a purge container) in the event that one of the circuits indicates that the media item is a counterfeit.
The step of sensing the media item at a third position on a transport path using a third circuit may include the further step of using an ultrasonic sensor to detect the media item.
The method may further comprise the step of: diverting the media item to a reject container in the event that one of the circuits indicates that the media item comprises a plurality of media items being transported as a single item.
According to a third aspect there is provided a currency dispenser operable to detect counterfeit banknotes, the currency dispenser comprising: a pick unit operable to pick individual media items from a currency cassette; a transport path operable to transport a media item from the pick unit to a dispense port; a first sensor located at the transport path near to the pick unit; a second sensor located at the transport path and longitudinally spaced apart from the first sensor; and a controller operable to divert the transported banknote in the event that one of the sensors indicates that the banknote is counterfeit.
The second sensor may be laterally offset from the first sensor.
The currency dispenser may comprise a third sensor located at the transport path near a diverter.
According to a fourth aspect of the present invention there is provided a cash dispenser comprising a plurality of sensors mounted along a transport path and coupled to a controller operable to make a validity decision about a transported banknote based on the outputs of the plurality of sensors.
The validity decision may be made in real time without slowing down the banknote transport speed.
The validity decision may be made as the banknote is being transported. The plurality of sensors may be located on each of two sides of a corner around which the transport path conveys the banknote.
According to a fifth aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of retro-fitting a cash dispenser by mounting a plurality of sensors in spaced relation along an existing banknote transport path and providing a controller operable to receive signals from the plurality of sensors and to detect counterfeit banknotes as they are being transported along the transport path.
The controller may be operable to detect counterfeit banknotes as they are being transported along the transport path without slowing down the speed of transport of the banknotes.
For clarity and simplicity of description, not all combinations of elements provided in the aspects recited above have been set forth expressly. Notwithstanding this, the skilled person will directly and unambiguously recognize that unless it is not technically possible, or it is explicitly stated to the contrary, the consistory clauses referring to one aspect are intended to apply mutatis mutandis as optional features of every other aspect to which those consistory clauses could possibly relate.
These and other aspects will be apparent from the following specific description, given by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Reference is first made to
The banknote dispenser 10 comprises: a removable currency cassette 12; a pick unit 14; a transport path 16; a stacker wheel 18; a presenter path 20; a controller 22, and a purge (or reject) bin 24. These components are all housed within a chassis 26.
The chassis 26 defines an exit port 28 at an end of the presenter path 20 opposite the stacker wheel 18.
The transport path 16 comprises an upright portion 30 for receiving a picked banknote from the pick unit 14, a generally horizontal portion 32 for conveying a picked banknote to the stacker wheel 18, and an inclined section 34 for conveying a picked banknote to the purge bin 24. The transport path 16 and the stacker wheel 18 are conventional components of a currency dispenser.
The destination of a picked banknote (the stacker wheel 18 or the purge bin 24) depends on the position of a pivoting divert gate 36. The pivoting divert gate 36 moves (in response to a signal from the controller 22) in the direction shown by double-headed arrow 38.
As is known to those of skill in the art, the transport path 16 includes belts, skid plates, and/or gear trains to transport banknotes from the pick unit 14 to either the stacker wheel 18 (under normal conditions) or to the purge bin 24 (if an exception occurs, as will be described in more detail below).
A plurality of discrete sensors are located at different points along the transport path 16, as will now be described with reference to
Each of the discrete sensors comprises a circuit board on which is mounted a transmitter and receiver. The transmitter and receiver may be in the form of an integrated transceiver, for example, where the sensor measures reflectance. Alternatively, the transmitter and receiver pair may comprise a separate transmitter and receiver, for example, where the sensor measures transmission. Each discrete sensor circuit board is connected to the controller 22 and sends signals thereto indicative of measurements taken from a banknote travelling along the transport path 16 as it passes that discrete sensor.
As illustrated in
The ultrasonic sensor 40b can also detect when multiple parts of a banknote are adhered to form a single composite banknote (which is a known type of counterfeiting activity). Thus, ultrasonic sensor 40b has the advantage that it can detect a single banknote composed of multiple banknote (and/or non-banknote) portions.
Unlike optical sensors, an ultrasonic sensor does not confuse a transparent window in a banknote with absence of a banknote. This is advantageous because a transparent window is included in some banknote designs, particularly where the banknote substrate is made from a polymer.
The second discrete sensor 42 is longitudinally spaced apart from the first discrete sensor 40. The second discrete sensor 42 is “downstream” of the first discrete sensor 40 in that the banknote 58 passes the first discrete sensor 40 before it passes the second discrete sensor 42. The second discrete sensor 42 comprises a second circuit board 42a on which is mounted (i) an ultra-violet (UV) reflective transceiver 42b and (ii) a position sensor 42c (in the form of a white LED transceiver). The UV transceiver 42b is laterally spaced apart from both the ultrasonic sensor 40b on the first circuit board 40a, and the position sensor 42c on the second circuit board 42a. The UV transceiver 42b emits radiation at approximately 365 nm. The UV transceiver 42b performs two functions. The first function is to validate the banknote 58 as it is transported across the first discrete sensor 42. The second function is to operate as a position sensor (complementary to position sensor 42c).
The position sensor 42c (in common with the other position sensors described below) is a conventional sensor that is used to detect if the banknote 58 is correctly located on the transport path 16.
The third discrete sensor 44 is downstream of the first and second discrete sensors 40, 42. The third discrete sensor 44 comprises a third circuit board 44a (which straddles the transport path 16; that is, it is both above and below the transport path 16). On an upper part of the third circuit board 44a (the part above the transport path 16), a green transmissive emitter (not shown individually) is mounted; and on a lower part of the third circuit board 44a (the part below the transport path 16), a green transmissive receiver (not shown individually) is mounted. The numeral 44b refers to the combined green transmissive emitter/receiver pair.
The combined green transmissive emitter/receiver pair 44b is mounted laterally offset from both the ultrasonic sensor 40b and the UV transceiver 42b. This is to ensure that a different part of the banknote 58 is measured by each of these sensors.
A position sensor 44c (in the form of a white LED transceiver) is also mounted on the third circuit board 44a, offset from the green transmissive emitter/receiver pair 44b.
In a similar manner to the UV transceiver 42b, the green transmissive emitter/receiver pair 44b also performs the two functions of banknote validation and position sensing. The green transmissive emitter/receiver pair 44b emits radiation at approximately 510 nm.
The fourth discrete sensor 46 is downstream of the first to third discrete sensors 40, 42, 44. The fourth discrete sensor 46 comprises a fourth circuit board 46a on which is mounted (i) a first infra-red (IR) reflective transceiver 46b and (ii) a position sensor 46c (in the form of a white LED transceiver), laterally spaced apart from the first IR transceiver 46b. The first IR transceiver 46b emits radiation at approximately 930 nm. The first IR transceiver 46b has two functions. The first function is to validate the banknote 58 as it is transported across the fourth discrete sensor 46. The second function is to operate as a position sensor (complementary to position sensor 46c).
The first IR transceiver 46b is mounted laterally offset from (i) the ultrasonic sensor 40b, (ii) the UV transceiver 42b, and (iii) the combined green transmissive emitter/receiver pair 44b. This is to ensure that a different part of the banknote 58 is measured by each of these sensors.
The fifth discrete sensor 48 is downstream of the first to fourth discrete sensors 40 to 46. The fifth discrete sensor 48 comprises a fifth circuit board 48a on which is mounted a second IR reflective transceiver 48b and (ii) a position sensor 48c (in the form of a white LED transceiver), laterally spaced apart from the second IR transceiver 48b. The second IR transceiver 48b is laterally offset from (i) the ultrasonic sensor 40b, (ii) the UV transceiver 42b, (iii) the combined green transmissive emitter/receiver pair 44b, and (iv) the first IR transceiver 46b.
The second IR transceiver 48b emits radiation at approximately 800 nm. The second IR transceiver 48b has two functions: (i) banknote validation, and (ii) position sensing.
The sixth discrete sensor 50 is downstream of the first to fifth discrete sensors 40 to 48. The sixth discrete sensor 50 comprises a sixth circuit board 50a on which is mounted (i) a second ultra-violet (UV) reflective transceiver 50b and (ii) a position sensor 50c (in the form of a white LED transceiver). The second UV transceiver 50b emits radiation at approximately 254 nm. In a similar manner to the first UV transceiver 42b, the second UV transceiver 50b also performs the two functions of banknote validation and position sensing.
The second UV transceiver 50b is mounted laterally offset from (i) the ultrasonic sensor 40b, (ii) the first UV transceiver 42b, (iii) the combined green transmissive emitter/receiver pair 44b, (iv) the first IR transceiver 46b, and (v) the second IR transceiver 48b. This is to ensure that a different part of the banknote 58 is measured by each of these sensors; thereby ensuring that a good quality counterfeit (or even part of a real banknote) at one part of the banknote is unlikely to be validated by all of the discrete sensors.
All six discrete sensors 40 to 50 are mounted adjacent the transport path 16 and between the pick unit 14 and the pivoting divert gate 36.
The operation of the media handler 10 will now be described with reference to
Initially, the controller 22 receives a command to pick a banknote from the currency cassette 12 (step 102).
The pick unit 14 picks a banknote (the banknote 58) (step 104) in response to an instruction from the controller 22, and then the controller 22 actuates motors (not shown) to move the picked banknote along the transport path (step 106).
When a leading edge of the picked banknote 58 reaches the first discrete sensor 40 this is detected by the ultrasonic sensor 40b (step 108).
The ultrasonic sensor 40b then takes a measurement from a portion of the banknote that is in registration with it (that is, in registration with the ultrasonic sensor 40b) as the banknote 58 passes under the ultrasonic sensor 40b (step 110).
The first discrete sensor 40 then transmits the measurements to the controller 22 (step 112).
The controller 22 then ascertains if this is the last discrete sensor (step 114). Each of the discrete sensors has a unique identification, which is transmitted together with the measurements it has taken from the banknote 58. The controller 22 is programmed so that it knows that the sixth discrete sensor 50 is the last sensor, so when the unique identification from the sixth discrete sensor 50 is received, the controller 22 knows that the last discrete sensor has been reached.
If the last discrete sensor has not been reached, then the flow returns to step 106 (that is, the controller 22 continues transporting the banknote 58).
If the last discrete sensor has been reached, then the controller 22 processes all of the received measurements from the six discrete sensors (step 116) to ascertain if the banknote is valid (step 118).
If one or more of the six discrete sensors 40 to 50 indicates that the banknote 58 is not valid (or if multiple banknotes are present) then the controller 22 activates the pivoting divert gate 36 (step 120).
The banknote 58 (which may actually comprise multiple superimposed banknotes transported erroneously as a single banknote) is then routed to the purge bin 24 via the inclined section 34 (step 122).
If all of the six discrete sensors 40 to 50 indicate that the banknote 58 is valid (which includes no multiple banknotes being present), or at least not invalid based on the measurements taken, then the controller 22 transports the banknote 58 to the stacker wheel 18 (step 124).
The process 100 shown in
It should be appreciated that the controller 22 is programmed to reach a decision before the transported banknote 58 reaches the pivoting divert gate 36 so that a decision can be made to divert the banknote, if necessary.
The controller 22 may execute a real time operating system to enable it to process data within a defined time (that is, prior to a transported banknote reaching the pivoting divert gate 36).
Most counterfeit notes inserted into a currency cassette are low quality counterfeits, so it may be possible to detect these using a simple binary function applied to each of the discrete sensors (for example, presence or absence of infra-red absorption for the first IR reflective transceiver 46b). Alternatively, if more accurate analysis is required then more complex validation algorithms may be used. For example, the controller 22 may use one or more of the algorithms described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,639,858 and 8,086,017, and the algorithms described in US published applications US 2008-0159614 and US 2008-0123931; all of which are assigned to the assignee of this application, and all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
This embodiment has the advantage that the ultrasonic sensor 40 is the first sensor that a banknote reaches. This means that even if the banknote includes a transparent window, the sensor will unambiguously detect the banknote; whereas, an optical sensor might not be able to differentiate between the window and the edge of a banknote.
Various modifications may be made to the above described embodiment within the scope of the invention, for example, in other embodiments, the dispenser may comprise a ballistic stacking dispenser.
In other embodiments, the media handler may comprise a recycler for receiving banknotes from a customer and dispensing the received banknotes to a subsequent customer.
In other embodiments, the media handler may comprise a greater or fewer number of discrete sensors than the six discrete sensors described above.
In the above embodiment, each discrete sensor conveyed a signal to the controller 22 for processing by the controller 22. In other embodiments, each discrete sensor may include a dedicated processor which outputs a digital signal indicating whether the media item is valid or invalid, based on the measurement recorded by that discrete sensor. In such embodiments, an OR Boolean function may be used to gate the outputs from each discrete sensor such that if even one discrete sensor indicates that the output is invalid then the media item is categorized as an invalid media item (for example, it may be categorized as a counterfeit or as a suspect counterfeit). The output of the dedicated processor may be an analogue signal, in which case additional processing would be performed on that output signal to ascertain if the media item is valid or invalid.
In the above embodiment, most of the discrete sensors are illustrated above the transport path. In other embodiments, most of the discrete sensors may below the transport path, or some of the discrete sensors may be above the transport path, others below the transport path, and others on either side of the transport path (for example, for a transmissive measurement).
In some embodiments, the transport path may be vertically oriented, rather than horizontally oriented as described in the above embodiment; in other words, media items may be transported on their edge (with their faces vertically aligned) rather than on their face (with their faces horizontally aligned). For a vertically oriented transport path, the discrete sensors may be on one or both sides of the transport path.
In other embodiments, different sensors may be used to those described above. For example, different types of sensors, different wavelengths of sensors, different numbers of sensors, different configurations of sensors may be used.
In other embodiments the discrete sensors may include a magnetic sensor or a metallic sensor.
In other embodiments, an iodine dropper could be provided on the transport path to apply some iodine to a banknote as it is being transported. Further downstream from the iodine dropper, an optical sensor may be provided to test the color of the iodine impregnated region on the banknote. Low quality counterfeit banknotes are typically printed on paper that includes starch, which reacts to iodine. The optical sensor could detect if the iodine has changed color (reacted with starch), thereby indicating that the banknote is a counterfeit.
The steps of the methods described herein may be carried out in any suitable order, or simultaneously where appropriate. The methods described herein may be performed by software in machine readable form on a tangible storage medium or as a propagating signal.
The terms “comprising”, “including”, “incorporating”, and “having” are used herein to recite an open-ended list of one or more elements or steps, not a closed list. When such terms are used, those elements or steps recited in the list are not exclusive of other elements or steps that may be added to the list.
Unless otherwise indicated by the context, the terms “a” and “an” are used herein to denote at least one of the elements, integers, steps, features, operations, or components mentioned thereafter, but do not exclude additional elements, integers, steps, features, operations, or components.
The presence of broadening words and phrases such as “one or more,” “at least,” “but not limited to” or other similar phrases in some instances does not mean, and should not be construed as meaning, that the narrower case is intended or required in instances where such broadening phrases are not used.
The reader's attention is directed to all papers and documents which are filed concurrently with or previous to this specification in connection with this application and which are open to public inspection with this specification, and the contents of all such papers and documents are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4398088 | Hirose et al. | Aug 1983 | A |
6142284 | Saltsov | Nov 2000 | A |
6435329 | Amari et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6797974 | Philipp et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7305113 | Yoshida et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7929749 | Jones et al. | Apr 2011 | B1 |
8781206 | Yacoubian | Jul 2014 | B1 |
20020092800 | Philipp | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030210386 | Laskowski | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030217906 | Baudat | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20050056694 | Kako et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050121287 | Giering et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050181695 | Yoshimura et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060016883 | Silva et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060177117 | Morisaki et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060254877 | Mulvey | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070114108 | Richards | May 2007 | A1 |
20070216976 | Endo | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080041941 | Talwerdi et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047802 | Nireki | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080150224 | Shimizu et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090057095 | Chien | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090159662 | Lee et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20100000838 | Hamasaki | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100060881 | Kayani | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100198396 | Brexel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100259749 | Zoladz | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100282566 | Zoladz | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20110061988 | Lonsdale | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110139575 | Voser | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20120285787 | Hosokawa et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130081923 | Frady et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1538353 | Oct 2004 | CN |
1818978 | Aug 2006 | CN |
102456246 | May 2012 | CN |
2 428 766 | Mar 2012 | EP |
1 484 719 | Dec 2012 | EP |
626162 | Apr 2003 | TW |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140158496 A1 | Jun 2014 | US |