The present invention relates to a method of charging a lithium-sulphur battery. The present invention also relates to a battery management system for charging a lithium-sulphur battery.
A typical lithium-sulphur cell comprises an anode (negative electrode) formed from lithium metal or a lithium metal alloy, and a cathode (positive electrode) formed from elemental sulphur or other electroactive sulphur material. The sulphur or other electroactive sulphur-containing material may be mixed with an electrically conductive material, such as carbon, to improve its electrical conductivity. Typically, the carbon and sulphur are ground and then mixed with solvent and binder to form a slurry. The slurry is applied to a current collector and then dried to remove the solvent. The resulting structure is calendared to form a composite structure, which is cut into the desired shape to form a cathode. A separator is placed on the cathode and a lithium anode placed on the separator. Electrolyte is then introduced into the assembled cell to wet the cathode and separator.
Lithium-sulphur cells are secondary cells and may be recharged by applying an external current to the cell. Typically, the cell is charged to a fixed cut-off voltage of, for example, 2.45-2.8V. However, with repeated cycling over an extended period, the capacity of the cell may fade. Accordingly, by repeatedly charging the cell to the selected cut-off voltage, the cell may eventually be repeatedly over-charged. This can have a detrimental effect on the longevity of the cell, as undesirable chemical reactions may take lead to damage to, for example, the cell's electrodes and/or electrolytes.
A method for terminating the charging of a lithium-sulphur cell is described in WO 2007/111988. Specifically, this reference describes adding an N—O additive, such as lithium nitrate, to the electrolyte of the cell. According to the passage at page 16, lines 29 to 31, of this reference, the additive is effective in providing a charge profile with a sharp increase in voltage at the point of full charge. Accordingly, if the cell voltage during charge is monitored, charging can be terminated once a rapid increase in voltage is observed.
The method of WO 2007/111988 relies on the voltage of the cell increasing sharply as the cell reaches full capacity. Not all lithium-sulphur cells, however, exhibit such a charging profile.
Advantages of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art with the benefit of the following detailed description of embodiments and upon reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
According to the present invention, there is provided a method of charging of a lithium-sulphur electrochemical cell, said method comprising:
determining the discharge capacity, Qn, of the cell during a charge-discharge cycle n,
calculating the value of a·Qn, where a=1.1 to 1.3, and,
in a later charge-discharge cycle, n+x, where x is an integer of 1 to 5, charging the cell to a capacity, Qn+x, that is equal to a·Qn.
Preferably, x is 1, 2 or 3, more preferably, 1 or 2, and most preferably 1. In a preferred embodiment, therefore, the cell is charged to a capacity that is determined as a function of the discharge capacity of the preceding cycle.
Preferably, a is a value selected from 1.1 to 1.2.
In a preferred embodiment, x is 1 or 2, preferably 1, and a is 1.1 to 1.2.
In the method of the present invention, the charge capacity of the cell is determined on the basis of the discharge capacity of an earlier (preferably the preceding) cycle. Because the discharge capacity of the cell is monitored, the cell can be charged to a level dependent on the number of charge-discharge cycles that the cell has undergone. In this way, the cell can be charged in such a way as to avoid or reduce the risk of over-charging as a result of capacity fade. By reducing the risk of over-charging, the risk of capacity fade may also be reduced. Advantageously, this can improve the longevity of the overall cell. This contrasts with conventional methods of charging a lithium sulphur cell where the cell is charged to a pre-determined voltage or capacity irrespective of the extent to which the cell has experienced capacity fade.
In one embodiment, the method of the present invention is applied from the first discharge cycle of the cell. In other words, the discharge capacity Qn is the beginning of life discharge capacity (Qbol) of the cell. In an alternative embodiment, the method of the present invention is applied after the cell has been charged more than once. In one embodiment, the method may be applied after signs of capacity fade are observed, for example, after 5 or more cycles of the cell. In one embodiment, the method of the present invention is applied after 10 or more cycles of the cell. Prior to implementing the method of the present invention, the cell may be charged using a different method, for example, by charging the cell to a fixed, pre-determined voltage using a constant current.
In one embodiment, the method additionally comprises the step of determining a threshold discharge capacity, Qt, of the cell. This threshold discharge capacity may be the discharge capacity of the cell during an early cycle in the life of the cell, for example, before any appreciable signs of capacity fade are observed. This may be the discharge capacity at the 5th cycle or sooner, for example, at the 4th, 3rd, 2nd or 1st cycle. In one embodiment, this may be the capacity of the cell during its first discharge cycle following cell assembly (i.e. the beginning of life discharge capacity, Qbol, or the discharge capacity at the first cycle). In a preferred embodiment, the threshold discharge capacity is the discharge capacity of the cell at the 1st or 2nd cycle.
Once the threshold discharge capacity is determined, the discharge capacity, Q, of the cell in subsequent discharge cycles is monitored. When the discharge capacity of the cell, Qm, falls below 0.8 Qt (e.g. below 0.7 Qt or below 0.6 Qt), the cell may be charged to (i) b·Qt, where b is 1.05 to 1.3, or to (ii) 2.45V, whichever is lower. Where the cell is charged to b·Qt, b is preferably 1.1 to 1.2, more preferably about 1.1. By charging the cell according to steps (i) or (ii) above once the discharge capacity of the cell falls below 0.8 Qt, the cell may be given a charging boost, converting a greater proportion of the short chain polysulphides to longer chain polysulphides. This can reduce the rate of subsequent losses in capacity due to undercharging of the cell.
Once the cell is charged according to steps (i) or (ii) above, the discharge capacity of the subsequent cycle is Qm+1. The charge capacity for the Qm+2 cycle is preferably a·Qm+1, wherein a is 1.1 to 1.3, preferably 1.1 to 1.2. The charge capacity of subsequent cycles may be based on the discharge capacity of the preceding cycle in this way until the discharge capacity of the cell once again falls below 0.8 Qtl (e.g. below 0.7 Qt or 0.6 Qt). At this point, steps (i) or (ii) may be repeated.
The present invention also provides a battery management system for carrying out the method described above. In a further aspect, the present invention provides a battery management system for a lithium-sulphur battery, said system comprising:
means for determining the discharge capacity, Qn, of the cell during a charge-discharge cycle (n),
means for calculating the value of a·Qn, where a=1.1 to 1.3, and,
means for charging the cell to a capacity Qn+x, that is equal to a·Qn in a later charge-discharge cycle, n+x, where x is an integer of 1 to 5.
The system may additionally include means for coupling the system to a lithium-sulphur battery. In one embodiment, the system includes a lithium sulphur battery.
In a preferred embodiment, the lithium-sulphur cell is charged by supplying electric energy at constant current. The current may be supplied so as to charge the cell in a time ranging from 30 minutes to 12 hours, preferably 8 to 10 hours. The current may be supplied at a current density ranging from 0.1 to 3 mA/cm2, preferably 0.1 to 0.3 mA/cm2. As an alternative to charging at a constant current, it may also be possible to charge the lithium-sulphur cell to a constant voltage until the relevant capacity is reached. Suitable voltages range from 2.35V to 2.8V
The electrochemical cell may be any suitable lithium-sulphur cell. The cell typically includes an anode, a cathode, and an electrolyte. Advantageously, a porous separator may be positioned between the anode and cathode. The anode may be formed of lithium metal or a lithium metal alloy. Preferably, the anode is a metal foil electrode, such as a lithium foil electrode. The lithium foil may be formed of lithium metal or lithium metal alloy.
The cathode of the electrochemical cell includes a mixture of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material. This mixture forms an electroactive layer, which may be placed in contact with a current collector.
The mixture of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material may be applied to the current collector in the form of a slurry in an organic solvent (e.g. water or an organic solvent). The solvent may then be removed and the resulting structure calendared to form a composite structure, which may be cut into the desired shape to form a cathode. A separator may be placed on the cathode and a lithium anode placed on the separator. Electrolyte may then be introduced into the assembled cell to wet the cathode and separator.
The electroactive sulphur material may comprise elemental sulphur, sulphur-based organic compounds, sulphur-based inorganic compounds and sulphur-containing polymers. Preferably, elemental sulphur is used.
The solid electroconductive material may be any suitable conductive material. Preferably, this solid electroconductive material may be formed of carbon. Examples include carbon black, carbon fibre and carbon nanotubes. Other suitable materials include metal (e.g. flakes, filings and powders) and conductive polymers. Preferably, carbon black is employed.
The weight ratio of electroactive sulphur material (e.g. elemental sulphur) to electroconductive material (e.g. carbon) may be 1 to 30:1; preferably 2 to 8:1, more preferably 5 to 7:1.
The mixture of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material may be a particulate mixture. The mixture may have an average particle size of 50 nm to 20 microns, preferably 100 nm to 5 microns.
The mixture of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material (i.e. the electroactive layer) may optionally include a binder. Suitable binders may be formed from at least one of, for example, polyethylene oxide, polytetrafluoroethylene, polyvinylidene fluoride, ethylene-propylene-diene rubber, methacrylate (e.g. UV-curable methacrylate), and divinyl esters (e.g. heat curable divinyl esters).
As discussed above, the cathode of the electrochemical cell may further comprise a current collector in contact with the mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material. For example, the mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material is deposited on the current collector. A separator is also disposed between the anode and the cathode of the electrochemical cell. For example, the separator may be in contact with the mixture of electroactive sulphur material and solid electroconductive material, which, in turn, is in contact with the current collector.
Suitable current collectors include metal substrates, such as foil, sheet or mesh formed of a metal or metal alloy. In a preferred embodiment, the current collector is aluminium foil.
The separator may be any suitable porous substrate that allows ions to move between the electrodes of the cell. The porosity of the substrate should be at least 30%, preferably at least 50%, for example, above 60%. Suitable separators include a mesh formed of a polymeric material. Suitable polymers include polypropylene, nylon and polyethylene. Non-woven polypropylene is particularly preferred. It is possible for a multi-layered separator to be employed.
Preferably, the electrolyte comprises at least one lithium salt and at least one organic solvent. Suitable lithium salts include at least one of lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6), lithium hexafluoroarsenate (LiAsF6), lithium perchlorate (LiClO4), lithium trifluoromethanesulfonimide (LiN(CF3SO2)2)), lithium borofluoride and lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate (CF3SO3Li). Preferably the lithium salt is lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate.
Suitable organic solvents are tetrahydrofurane, 2-methyltetrahydrofurane, dimethylcarbonate, diethylcarbonate, ethylmethylcarbonate, methylpropylcarbonate, methylpropylpropionate, ethylpropylpropionate, methyl acetate, dimethoxyethane, 1, 3-dioxolane, diglyme (2-methoxyethyl ether), tetraglyme, ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, γ-butyrolactone, dioxolane, hexamethyl phosphoamide, pyridine, dimethyl sulfoxide, tributyl phosphate, trimethyl phosphate, N, N, N, N-tetraethyl sulfamide, and sulfone and their mixtures. Preferably, the organic solvent is a sulfone or a mixture of sulfones. Examples of sulfones are dimethyl sulfone and sulfolane. Sulfolane may be employed as the sole solvent or in combination, for example, with other sulfones.
The organic solvent used in the electrolyte should be capable of dissolving the polysulphide species, for example, of the formula Sn2−, where n=2 to 12, that are formed when the electroactive sulphur material is reduced during discharge of the cell.
The concentration of lithium salt in the electrolyte is preferably 0.1 to 5M, more preferably 0.5 to 3M, for example, 1M. The lithium salt is preferably present at a concentration that is at least 70%, preferably at least 80%, more preferably at least 90%, for example, 95 to 99% of saturation.
In one embodiment, the electrolyte comprises lithium trifluoromethanesulphonate and sulfolane.
The weight ratio of electrolyte to the total amount of electroactive sulphur material and electroconductive material is 1-15:1; preferably 2-9:1, more preferably 6-8:1.
In this example, a lithium-sulphur cell is charged to a fixed voltage over 200+ cycles.
In this Example, a lithium-sulphur cell is charged to a fixed voltage until initial signs of capacity fade are observed at the end of cycle 15. The discharge capacity at cycle 15, Q15 is determined and, at cycle 16, the cell is charged to a capacity that is a·Q15, where a=1.10. The discharge capacity at cycle 16, Q16, is then determined and, at cycle 17, the cell is charged to a·Q16 and so on. As can be seen in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13160790 | Mar 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2014/050891 | 3/21/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/155070 | 10/2/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3030720 | Osswald et al. | Apr 1962 | A |
3185590 | Mayer et al. | May 1965 | A |
3578500 | Maricle et al. | May 1971 | A |
3639174 | Kegelman | Feb 1972 | A |
3721113 | Hovsepian | Mar 1973 | A |
3778310 | Garth | Dec 1973 | A |
3877983 | Hovsepian | Apr 1975 | A |
3907591 | Lauck | Sep 1975 | A |
3907597 | Mellors | Sep 1975 | A |
3951688 | Pankow et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4060674 | Klemann et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4104451 | Klemann et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4118550 | Koch | Oct 1978 | A |
4154906 | Bubnick et al. | May 1979 | A |
4163829 | Kronenberg | Aug 1979 | A |
4218523 | Kalnoki-Kis | Aug 1980 | A |
4252876 | Koch | Feb 1981 | A |
4303748 | Armand et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4318430 | Perman | Mar 1982 | A |
4410609 | Peled et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4499161 | Foos | Feb 1985 | A |
4503234 | Huwiler et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4550064 | Yen et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4690877 | Gabano et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4725927 | Morimoto et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4740436 | Kobayashi et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
5079109 | Takami et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5219684 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5368958 | Hirai et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5460905 | Skotheim | Oct 1995 | A |
5462566 | Skotheim | Oct 1995 | A |
5523179 | Chu | Jun 1996 | A |
5529860 | Skotheim et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5532077 | Chu | Jul 1996 | A |
5582623 | Chu | Dec 1996 | A |
5587253 | Gozdz et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5648187 | Skotheim | Jul 1997 | A |
5744262 | Cheng et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5789108 | Chu | Aug 1998 | A |
5797428 | Miller | Aug 1998 | A |
5814420 | Chu | Sep 1998 | A |
5919587 | Mukherjee et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5961672 | Skotheim et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5962171 | Boguslavsky et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6030720 | Chu et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6090504 | Sung et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6117590 | Skotheim et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6162562 | Tsuji et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6174621 | Skotheim et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6201100 | Gorkovenko et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210831 | Gorkovenko et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6245465 | Angell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6302928 | Xu et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319633 | Ikeda et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6344293 | Geronov | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6358643 | Katz | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6376123 | Chu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6537704 | Akashi et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6544691 | Guidotti | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6613480 | Hwang et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632573 | Nimon et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6706449 | Mikhaylik et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6733924 | Skotheim et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6797428 | Skotheim et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
7108942 | Gan et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7250233 | Choi et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7335440 | Aamodt et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7354680 | Mikhaylik et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20010008736 | Fanta et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020022181 | Tsujioka et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034688 | Chu et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020039677 | Iwamoto et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045101 | Hwang et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020045102 | Youngiu et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020102466 | Hwang et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020168574 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020192557 | Choi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030073005 | Kim et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030157411 | Jung | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030175596 | Park et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030180611 | Mikhaylik et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030190530 | Yang et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040002002 | Mitzuta et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028999 | LaLiberte | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040048164 | Jung et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040053129 | Jung et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072066 | Cho et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040091776 | Hwang | May 2004 | A1 |
20040096750 | Kim et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040101753 | Hwang | May 2004 | A1 |
20040137330 | Lee et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040157132 | Kim et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040219428 | Nagayama | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040222768 | Moore et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258996 | Kim et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050136327 | Miyake et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050156575 | Mikhaylik | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175903 | Kim | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050221192 | Hennige et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238956 | Lee | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050244693 | Strutt et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060024579 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060051643 | Sarkar et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060105233 | Morita | May 2006 | A1 |
20060121355 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060177741 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060204856 | Ryu et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060234126 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060238203 | Kelley | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060292451 | Lee et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070072076 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070281210 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080038645 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080060189 | Daidoji et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080100264 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20090053565 | Iacovelli | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090111029 | Lee et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090246626 | Tasaki et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090317717 | Ryu et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100129724 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100231168 | Kolosnitsyn et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110059361 | Wilkening et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20120282530 | Chiang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293114 | Murochi et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120315553 | Fuminori et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140079989 | Janakiraman | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20150147656 | Kogetsu et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150234014 | Moganty | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1389948 | Jan 2003 | CN |
764489 | Mar 1997 | EP |
924783 | Jun 1999 | EP |
710995 | Mar 2001 | EP |
1176659 | Jan 2002 | EP |
1178555 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1400996 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1420475 | May 2004 | EP |
1865520 | Dec 2007 | EP |
1962364 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2023461 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2026402 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2259376 | Dec 2010 | EP |
2084391 | Apr 1982 | GB |
2200068 | Jul 1988 | GB |
59194361 | Nov 1984 | JP |
64-107467 | Apr 1989 | JP |
01-124969 | May 1989 | JP |
08069812 | Mar 1996 | JP |
8-138742 | May 1996 | JP |
08138650 | May 1996 | JP |
8298229 | Nov 1996 | JP |
8298230 | Nov 1996 | JP |
09-027328 | Jan 1997 | JP |
9147913 | Jun 1997 | JP |
63-081767 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10284076 | Oct 1998 | JP |
11-273729 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2001-167751 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001167751 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2002-75446 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2005-071641 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-108724 | Apr 2005 | JP |
2005-005215 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-243342 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006134785 | May 2006 | JP |
2009-087728 | Apr 2009 | JP |
2011108469 | Jun 2011 | JP |
2011-192574 | Sep 2011 | JP |
10-2002-0089134 | Nov 2002 | KR |
10-0368753 | Apr 2003 | KR |
10-2003-0056497 | Jul 2003 | KR |
10-2011-0024707 | Mar 2011 | KR |
2001-047088 | Jun 2001 | WO |
197304 | Dec 2001 | WO |
2002-095849 | Nov 2002 | WO |
2004021475 | Mar 2004 | WO |
2006-050117 | May 2006 | WO |
2007-111988 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2007-132994 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Jeon et al. Solvent-Free Polymer Electrolytes Based on Thermally Annealed Porous P(VdF-HFP)/P(EO-EC) Membranes. |
Suo et al. “A New Class of Solvent-in-Salt Electrolyte for High-Energy Rechargeable Metallic Lithium Batteries” Nature Communications, 2013, vol. 4, p. 1481. |
UK Search Report, Application No. GB 0416708.6, Section 17, dated Aug. 10, 2004. |
UK Search Report, Application No. GB 0501001.2, dated Apr. 14, 2005. |
Japanese Office Action for JP Application No. 2007-550839 dated Apr. 1, 2014. |
Korean Office Action for Application No. 10-2013-7031637, dated Jan. 27, 2014. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2005/002850, dated Aug. 25, 2005. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2005/002850, dated Aug. 25, 2005. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2005/002850, dated Jan. 30, 2007. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2006/000103, dated Jun. 20, 2007. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2006/000103, dated Jun. 20, 2007. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2006/000103, dated Jul. 24, 2007. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2006/050300, dated Dec. 6, 2006. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2006/050300, dated Dec. 6, 2006. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2006/050300, dated Mar. 26, 2008. |
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/051633, dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/051633, dated Feb. 1, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/051633, dated Jun. 17, 2014. |
International Search Report, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/052728, dated Jan. 2, 2013. |
Written Opinion, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/052728, dated Jan. 2, 2013. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT Application No. PCT/GB2012/052728, dated Aug. 19, 2014. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/05088, dated Jul. 7, 2014. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/05088, dated Jul. 7, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050888, dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050890, dated Jun. 2, 2014. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050890, dated Jun. 2, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050890, dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050891, dated Jul. 24, 2014. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050891, dated Jul. 24, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/050891, dated Sep. 29, 2015. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/052474, dated Nov. 5, 2014. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/052474, dated Nov. 5, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/052474, dated Feb. 16, 2016. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053715, dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053715, dated Feb. 27, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053715, dated Jun. 21, 2016. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053719, dated Feb. 24, 2015. |
Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053719, dated Feb. 24, 2015. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/GB2014/053719, dated Jun. 21, 2016. |
Cowie et al. “Ion Conduction in Macroporous Polyethylene Film Doped With Electrolytes” Solid State Ionics 109 (1998) 139-144. |
U.S. Appl. No. 12/527,701, filed Jun. 18, 2009, Kolosnitsyn et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,203, filed Jul. 27, 2005, Kolosnitsyn et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, filed Jan. 17, 2006, Kolosnitsyn et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, filed Mar. 22, 2006, Kolosnitsyn et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 60/721,062, filed Sep. 28, 2005, Kolosnitsyn et al. |
Bates et al., “Solvent Effects on Acid-Base Behavior: Five Uncharged Acids in Water-Sulfolane Solvents”, 1976, Journal of Solution Chemistry, vol. 5, No. 3, p. 213-222. |
Definitions of “slurry” and “suspension”, Merriam Webster's, Collegiate Dictionary (10th Edition), printed Feb. 4, 2008. |
Komaba et al., “Inorganic Electrolyte Additives to Supress the Degradation of Graphite Anodes by Dissolved Mn(II) for Lithium Ion Batteries”, Mar. 2003, Journal of Power Sources, 1190121, p. 378-382. |
Chagnes et al., “Butyrolactone-Ethylene Carbonate Based Electrolytes for Lithium Ion Batteries”, Jul. 2003, Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 33, p. 589-595. |
Yamin H., Peled E, “Electrochemistry of a Nonaqueous Lithium/Sulphur Cell”, J of Power Sources, 1983, vol. 9, p. 281-287. |
D. Aurbach, E. Zinigrad, Y. Cohen, H. Teller, “A Short Review of Failure Mechanisms of Lithium Metal and Lithiated Graphite Anodes in Liquid Electrolyte Solutions”, Solid State Ionics, 2002, vol. 148, p. 405-416. |
Duck-Rye Chang, Suck-Hyun Lee, Sun-Wook Kim, Hee-Tak Kim, “Binary Electrolyte Based on Tetra (ethylene glycol) Dimethyl Ether and 1,3-dioxolane for Lithium-Sulphur Battery”, J. Power Sources, 2002, vol. 112, p. 452-460. |
Yamin H., Penciner J., Gorenshtein A., Elam M., Peled E., “The Electrochemical Behavior of Polysulphides in Tetrahydrofuran”, J. of Power Sources, 1985, vol. 14, p. 129-134. |
Yamin H., Gorenshtein A., Penciner J., Sternberg Y., Peled E., “Lithium Sulphur Battery Oxidation/Reduction Mechanisms of Polysulphides in THF Solution”, J. Electrochem Soc. 1988, vol. 135, No. 5, p. 1045-1048. |
J. Paris, V. Plichon, “Electrochemical Reduction of Sulphur in Dimethylacetamide”, Electrochimica Acta, 1981, vol. 26, No. 12, p. 1823-1829. |
Levillain E., Gaillard F., Leghie P., Demortier A., Lelieu J.P., “On the Understanding of the Reduction of Sulphur (S8) in Dimethylformamide (DMF)”, J. of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 1997, vol. 420, p. 167-177. |
Peled E., Gorenshrein A., Segal M., Sternberg Y, “Rechargeable Lithium-Sulphur Battery (extended abstract)”, J. of Power Sources, 1989, vol. 26, p. 269-271. |
Peled E., Sternberg Y., Gorenshtein A., Lavi Y., “Lithium-Sulphur Battery: Evaluation of Dioxolane-Based Electrolytes”, J. Electrochem Soc., 1989, vol. 136, No. 6, p. 1621-1625. |
Rauh R.D. Abraham K.M., Pearson G.F., Surprenant J.K., Brummer S.B., “A Lithium/Dissolved Sulphur Battery with an Organic Electrolyte”, J. Electrochem Soc., 1979, vol. 126, No. 4, p. 523-527. |
Rauh R.D., Shuker F.S., Marston J.M., Brummer S.B., “Formation of Lithium Polysulphides in Aprotic Media”, J. inorg. Nucl Chem, 1977, vol. 39, p. 1761-1766. |
Shin-Ichi Tobishima, Hideo Yamamoto, Minoru Matsuda, “Study on the Reduction Species of Sulfur by Alkali Metals in Nonaqueous Solvents”, Electrochimica Acta, 1997, vol. 42, No. 6, p. 1019-1029. |
Taitiro Fujinaga, Tooru Kuwamoto, Satoshi Okazaki, Masashi Horo, “Electrochemical Reduction of Elemental Sulphur in Acetonitrile”, Bull Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1980, vol. 53, p. 2851-2855. |
Gholam-Abbas Nazri, Gianfranco Pistoia, “Lithium Batteries: Science and Technology”, 2003, p. 509-573, Hardcover, ISBN: 978-1-4020-7628-2. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/290,825, dated Jun. 11, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/526,876, dated Oct. 30, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,203, dated Oct. 9, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/190,203, dated Apr. 3, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Jul. 31, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Feb. 26, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Aug. 27, 2008. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Sep. 28, 2007. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Mar. 11, 2008. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Feb. 20, 2007. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/332,471, dated Aug. 21, 2007. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, dated Jan. 6, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, dated Aug. 19, 2008. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, dated Feb. 5, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,113, dated Jul. 24, 2009. |
Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/889,334, dated Aug. 14, 2009. |
“Transportation Regulations for Lithium, Lithium Ion and Polymer Cells and Batteries”, Ultralife Batteries, Inc. Rev. H, Dec. 18, 2003. |
V.S. Kolosnitsyn, L.V. Sheina and S.E. Mochalov, “Physicochemical and Electrochemical Properties of Sulfolane Solutions of Lithium Salts”, May 2008, p. 575-578, MAIK Nauka/Interperiodica distributed exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160006083 A1 | Jan 2016 | US |