This invention relates to the method of using thrusters in waterways to control the flooding in and around bayous and rivers and more specifically to preventing the ingestion of trash into the thruster inlet.
Conventional flood control is done by having a waterway such as bayous, rivers, or streams lead from the area in which it is raining toward the ocean, or in the case of the Houston area, to the Gulf of Mexico. As rain falls, water travels down to the lower parts of the waterway at a speed which is a function of the grade or slope of the waterway and the depth of the water, typically carrying a variety of debris with it. The more the grade or the difference in height from where the rain is falling to the ocean, the faster the water will flow and when water is deeper, more of the water is away from the wall effects and therefore it will flow faster as more and more rain falls. The waterway will become increasingly fuller until at some point the amount of water which will flow down to the waterway is exceeded by the amount of rain fall, and therefore you have a flood.
The elevation of the seawater the water is flowing to and the elevation of the area in which the rain is falling on are not variable for a specific location. Therefore, the conventional methods for increasing the amount of flow is by making the waterway larger, making it straighter so that the water will not be slowed down by making turns, and removing friction causing impediments from the waterway such as trees.
In the case of the Great Flood of 2001 in the City of Houston and Hurricane Harvey in 2017, the elevation between the flooded area and the Gulf of Mexico was about 24 feet above sea level and the distance from the flooded area to the Gulf Mexico was about 20 miles. So, the driving force of the rainwater was a head of about 24 feet. It literally would not do a substantial amount of good to make the waterway significantly deeper because if the waterway were significantly deeper it would potentially be below sea level. To make the waterway progressively wider to increase the volume in a highly urbanized area is a massive investment in the purchase of land and the movement of earth, and the changes to other civil engineering structures such as bridges and roads.
This invention will be primarily discussed in terms of the sites specific application of Houston, Tex. and the floods of 2001 and 2017. However, it can be applied to a number of other localities such as even flooding on the Mississippi River can be prevented by the methods discussed herein.
Flooding is caused because water is concentrated in an area and is not caused to move out of that area to the sea. That is an obvious statement, but it is a statement well worth considering. If we take one pound of water in the middle of the flood in Houston and desire to deliver it to the Gulf of Mexico at sea level, it will be reduced in height by the amount of the elevation in Houston to the elevation of sea level or about 24 feet. In other words, it will give up about 24 foot-pounds of energy in the transportation from Houston to the Gulf of Mexico. Where do the 24-foot pounds go? The 24 foot-pounds of energy goes to frictional losses moving down Buffalo Bayou from Houston to the Gulf of Mexico. A certain amount of the energy is retained in kinetic energy as it has a velocity as it enters the Gulf of Mexico and so some part of the energy is given up due to frictional losses traveling down Buffalo Bayou some of it is kinetic energy which dissipates into the Gulf of Mexico as it arrives at the Gulf of Mexico. Pound for pound this says that each pound of water in the middle of the flood has 24 pound-feet of energy available to drive itself from the flooded area to the Gulf of Mexico. This additionally says that in the flooded situation in the City of Houston with the volume of water to be handled at that time, 24 foot-pounds of energy is not enough to drive the water away fast enough to prevent flooding. We literately have an objective measure that says this is not enough energy, not enough horsepower or however you want to say it, to get the job done.
The object of this invention is to provide a means to minimize and or completely eliminate flooding from occurring in an area such as Houston, even in a 500 year rain scenario such as happened in 2001 or a 1000 year rain scenario such as happened in 2017.
A second objective is to provide means to eliminate flooding at a economic cost. In this particular case in Houston, $4.8 billions of cost were incurred in the City of Houston. But the one number that is of particular interest is at the University of Houston. It is estimated that two hundred and fifty million dollar's worth of flood damage was done in this one site alone. It is a suggestion of this application that an investment of the same two hundred and fifty million dollars in the greater Houston area would eliminate all significant flooding permanently.
Another object of this invention is not to do great civil engineering projects that digs great ditches to carry the flow away but rather provide enough energy or enough horsepower to move the water fast enough in currently available waterways so that the flooding does not occur.
Another objective of this invention is to make the system tolerant to the types of debris which will naturally be carried in the flood waters, both floating and submerged.
Illustrative embodiments of the invention are described below. In the interest of clarity, not all features of an actual implementation are described in this specification. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any such actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made to achieve the developers' specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort, even if complex and time-consuming, would be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
How do we input power into water in open channels? Remote subsea vehicles, thrusters on great vessels and even propellers on large ships are means to put energy into water, to cause water to move in one direction, normally with the objective of moving the vessel in the opposite direction. Literally a propeller takes a small poundage of water and throws it to the rear of the ship. That energy of throwing the water to the rear of the ship causes an equal reaction in the opposite direction and provides force to move the ship forward. One can see the water speeding from the propeller at rear of a boat. Imagine that a giant propeller the size of a river is turning in a river, you can easily see that the water in the river will be accelerated.
Now imagine that every one thousand feet along the Houston Ship Channel from downtown Houston to the start of the bay system into the Gulf of Mexico we put a water jet thruster package into the water. It is a distance of about 20 miles. That would be about 5 thruster packages per mile or about 100 thruster packages. Now assume in the normal flood situation, the waters are being carried away from downtown Houston, down the Houston Ship Channel, at approximately 3 miles per hour. The speed is a balance between the energy provided by the water and the frictional forces resisting it.
Now assume that we have enough thrusters and we put enough power in each of the thrusters to increase the speed of the water to 6 miles per hour. If we literally increase the speed of the water in the Houston Ship Channel from 3 miles per hour to 6 miles per hour, we increase the flow rate from about 150 million cubic feet per hour to about 300 million cubic feet per hour and the flood disappears. The thrusters will take a small percentage of the flowing water into them and accelerate it out to a higher speed such as 30 miles per hour. When this accelerated water merges back into the flowing water, the average speed of all the water flowing will be increased.
The better scenario isn't that we turn on the thrusters and cause the flood to go away, but when the rain comes we turn on the thrusters and the flood never happens in the first place.
If the estimate of water at flood stage in Buffalo Bayou from Houston is a minimum of 36 feet deep, 300 feet wide at the surface, 228 feet wide at the bottom and the water flowing at the rate of 3 miles per hour, that would mean that a total of 1,003,622 cubic feet of water would be flowing, or 62,626,037,760 lbs. of water would be flowing. If the bayou slopes 24′ in 20 miles, it drops 1.2 feet per mile or 3.6 feet in one hour, or 0.000682 feet per minute. The energy derived is 0.000682 feet times 62,626,037,760 lbs. or 42,699,571 feet-pounds per minute. This divided by 33,000 gives 1,294 horsepower.
If the power required is a function of the square of the velocity, and the system method is only 50% efficient, then 1294*4/0.5=10352 horsepower. If we divide the 10352 horsepower by the 100 thruster stations, we get that each of the thruster stations would require a minimum of 103.5 horsepower.
Referring now to
A multiplicity of thrusters 10-14 are shown in Buffalo Bayou 1, the lower end of Buffalo Bayou actually being the Houston Ship Channel 9. The thrusters 10-14 are shown above the water level in normal conditions in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The thruster 42 is effectively shown being mounted generally parallel to the center of the water way. In actual practice, benefits will be seen from having thrusters on opposite sides of the waterway and inclined rotated slightly toward the center of the waterway to optimize the addition of kinetic energy to the water in preference to added bank friction. Bottom of the bayou or river 30 is shown at 50 and the side is shown at 52. Revetments are shown at 54 which are generally one-foot cube concrete blocks interlaced with steel cable to reinforce the bank against erosion which still allowing green grass to grow. Alternately the sides of the waterway can be lined with concrete to prevent erosion.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The decision to reverse the flow and clean the inlets can be made in a variety of ways. Some of the ways might be to monitor the suction pressure within chamber 126 and when it exceeds a desire value do a cleaning reversal, doing it at predetermined timed intervals, signaling the operation by remote control.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The particular thruster embodiment shown in the figures is a series of propellers mounted in a cylindrical housing. Any number of embodiments for a thruster can be utilized in this service, such as a single open propeller, gear pumps, or piston pumps.
As the water level rises in the waterway, various means such as floats or pressure sensors can be utilized to automatically turn the engine on to drive the thruster until the water level drops satisfactorily. Additionally, remote or radio-controlled means can be easily utilized to start, stop, or regulate the speed of the thrusters.
The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the invention may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the claims below. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the invention. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the claims below.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1173568 | Griffin | Feb 1916 | A |
2612861 | Burkey | Oct 1952 | A |
2623610 | Buechel | Dec 1952 | A |
2695074 | Kelly | Nov 1954 | A |
2751881 | Burkey | Jun 1956 | A |
2761421 | Burkey | Sep 1956 | A |
2928497 | Stockdale | Mar 1960 | A |
3343368 | Castoldi | Sep 1967 | A |
3658028 | Koons | Apr 1972 | A |
3671022 | Laird | Jun 1972 | A |
3740785 | Latall | Jun 1973 | A |
3889624 | Balius | Jun 1975 | A |
4029049 | Hillier | Jun 1977 | A |
4055947 | Gongwer | Nov 1977 | A |
4467831 | French | Aug 1984 | A |
4726183 | Gongwer | Feb 1988 | A |
4740105 | Wollander | Apr 1988 | A |
5048445 | Lever | Sep 1991 | A |
5083948 | Grobson | Jan 1992 | A |
5263833 | Robinson | Nov 1993 | A |
5431122 | Templet, Jr. | Jul 1995 | A |
5632572 | Chicha | May 1997 | A |
5673449 | Henriksson | Oct 1997 | A |
5720824 | Bronson | Feb 1998 | A |
6102619 | Truebe | Aug 2000 | A |
6132270 | Nagel | Oct 2000 | A |
6152793 | Gongwer | Nov 2000 | A |
6273642 | Anderson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6352455 | Guagliano | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6729800 | Burns, II | May 2004 | B2 |
6736572 | Geraghty | May 2004 | B2 |
7419334 | Baugh | Sep 2008 | B2 |
8870445 | Burns, II | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20080022652 | Blacklidge | Jan 2008 | A1 |