Improvement of fuel economy in modern vehicles continues to be an important aspect of engine and transmission design. One known method of improving fuel economy is to implement a fuel cut mode when the vehicle is coasting, with the throttle closed, while traveling at relatively high speeds. The supply of fuel is cut off from the engine and the vehicle allowed to coast until the engine speed drops below a certain threshold or a request to accelerate the vehicle is once again made (the throttle is opened). If the vehicle is decelerating and has an automatic transmission, gear shifting, typically from fifth for fourth gears may occur while the vehicle is in a fuel cut mode.
As shown in
During a shift from fifth gear to fourth gear, made in combination with application of the vehicle's brakes, overslip of the lock-up and shift clutches occurs and as a result the engine speed drops more than if such overslip did not occur (no brake application).
To satisfy Fuel Economy tests designed by the EPA, the fuel cut mode must be maintained during a shift from fifth to fourth gear when the vehicle is decelerating moderately. However, the fuel cut mode does not need to be maintained during high deceleration.
Referring to
What is desired is a method of engine and transmission operation that allows the engine to remain in a fuel cut mode for an extended time, even during a downshift, while minimizing the phenomenon of shift shock. The viability of the method must be demonstrable during Fuel Economy testing designed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), that includes a fifth to fourth downshift step while braking the vehicle.
The method of the present invention utilizes the measured rate of vehicle acceleration or deceleration (hereinafter DTV). Depending on the rate of deceleration, the pressure upon the lock-up and shift clutches is modulated to improve fuel efficiency and user comfort accordingly. In prior practice, these pressures were set particularly high, and at a fixed level, in order to guarantee fuel efficiency, but sacrificing user comfort by causing excessive amounts of shift shock. In the present invention, the clutch pressures are manipulated or controlled in accordance with several vehicle deceleration rates. For example, if the rate of deceleration is low, the pressure applied to the shift and lock-up clutches is low; there is no increase of the applied pressures. If the rate of deceleration is moderate, the pressure on the lock-up and shift clutches is moderately increased. If the rate of deceleration is high, the fuel cut mode need not be maintained to meet EPA tests, thus, the pressure on the shift clutch is low; there is no increase of the applied pressures. Further, if the rate of deceleration is high, the lock-up clutch is completely disengaged.
As a result of selective pressure manipulation based on deceleration, the fuel cut mode is maintained on the vehicle for an increased period of time resulting in improved vehicle fuel economy. In addition, an overly large pressure is not used to maintain the fuel cut mode and additional pressure is not applied in instances of high deceleration rates, and as a result shift shock is minimized resulting in greater driver comfort.
These and further features of the invention will be apparent with reference to the following description and drawings, wherein:
a is a chart showing known performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a low rate of deceleration;
b is a chart showing known performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a moderate rate of deceleration;
c is a chart showing known performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a high rate of deceleration;
a is a chart showing performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a low rate of deceleration utilizing increased clutch pressures;
b is a chart showing performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a moderate rate of deceleration utilizing increased clutch pressures;
c is a chart showing performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a high rate of deceleration utilizing increased clutch pressures;
a is a chart showing performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a low rate of deceleration utilizing the method of the present invention;
b is a chart showing performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a moderate rate of deceleration utilizing the method of the present invention;
c is a chart showing performance of a vehicle engine and transmission at a high rate of deceleration utilizing the method of the present invention;
As used in this description and in the appended claims, the following terms will have the definitions indicated thereafter:
1) “GRATIO slip” means the slippage of a shift clutch associated with a specified gear train in an automatic transmission;
2) “LC slip” means the slippage of the lock-up clutch used in combination with the torque converter on a vehicle with an automatic transmission;
3) “NE” means the rotational speed of the vehicle engine (in rpm);
4) “DTV” means the electronic output of the vehicle computer relating to vehicle deceleration rate;
5) “Fuel Cut Control Function” means operation of a vehicle wherein above a designated engine speed (and vehicle speed; the vehicle's motion solely driving the engine), with the throttle closed, fuel is not supplied to the engine.
Referring to
The performance of a vehicle without using the improvements of the present invention is shown in
a-2c, as previously described, illustrates one method of preventing excessive slippage of the lock-up clutch and shift clutches, by increasing the pressure of the lock-up clutch and shift clutches by a consistent amount during shifting under all operating conditions. As previously described, this method provides the unwanted phenomenon of “shift shock” which is especially prevalent at high rates of vehicle deceleration. High rates of deceleration cause greater amounts of GRATIO slip. And if the shift clutch pressure is increasing too rapidly at the point where GRATIO begins to change, there will be harsh shift shock.
a-3c, illustrate vehicle performance at deceleration rates comparable to
Referring to
In step 20 of
If the sensed vehicle deceleration exceeds the first threshold value of deceleration (e.g. increases to 2 meters per second squared), an instance illustrated by
If the sensed vehicle deceleration does not exceed the first threshold value of vehicle deceleration, comparison to a second, lower, deceleration value is made at step 60. The second threshold value of deceleration is preferably about 0.75 meters per second squared. If the sensed vehicle deceleration exceeds the second threshold value of deceleration, two steps are performed. This instance is illustrated in
If the sensed vehicle deceleration does not exceed either the first threshold value or second threshold values of deceleration, two steps are performed. This instance is illustrated in
The deceleration of the vehicle is sampled periodically and compared to the threshold values after each sampling. Although all clutch pressures have been referred to as actual clutch pressure, an equivalent method has each of the previously described clutch pressures as requests for clutch pressure within a vehicle control system. It is understood that achieving an actual clutch pressure may not be the instantaneous result of implementing a request for such a clutch pressure and that the magnitude of actual clutch pressure may not reach the exact magnitude of the requested clutch pressure.
Although the method of the present invention has been described for use on shift clutch and lock-up clutch pressure management during a shift from fifth to fourth gear, the method may also be used during a shift from fourth to third gear.
Although the invention has been shown and described with reference to certain preferred and alternate embodiments, the invention is not limited to these specific embodiments. Minor variations and insubstantial differences in the various combinations of materials and methods of application may occur to those of ordinary skill in the art while remaining within the scope of the invention as claimed and equivalents.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/721,610, filed on Sep. 29, 2005, the entirety of which is incorporated herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60721610 | Sep 2005 | US |