Method of coating with combined kinetic spray and thermal spray

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6743468
  • Patent Number
    6,743,468
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, April 17, 2003
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 1, 2004
    20 years ago
Abstract
Disclosed is a system and a method for applying both a kinetic spray applied coating layer and a thermal spray applied layer onto a substrate using a single application nozzle. The system includes a higher heat capacity gas heater to permit oscillation between a kinetic spray mode wherein the particles being applied are not thermally softened and a thermal spray mode wherein the particles being applied are thermally softened prior to application. The system increases the versatility of the spray nozzle and addresses several problems inherent in kinetic spray applied coatings.
Description




TECHNICAL FIELD




The present invention is a method and an apparatus for applying a coating to a substrate, and more particularly, to a method and an apparatus for applying both a kinetic spray coating and a thermal spray coating from the same nozzle.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




A new technique for producing coatings on a wide variety of substrate surfaces by kinetic spray, or cold gas dynamic spray, was recently reported in articles by T. H. Van Steenkiste et al., entitled “kinetic Spray Coatings,” published in Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 111, pages 62-71, Jan. 10, 1999 and “Aluminum coatings via kinetic spray with relatively large powder particles” published in Surface and Coatings Technology 154, pages 237-252, 2002. The articles discuss producing continuous layer coatings having low porosity, high adhesion, low oxide content and low thermal stress. The articles describe coatings being produced by entraining metal powders in an accelerated air stream, through a converging-diverging de Laval type nozzle and projecting them against a target substrate. The particles are accelerated in the high velocity air stream by the drag effect. The air used can be any of a variety of gases including air or helium. It was found that the particles that formed the coating did not melt or thermally soften prior to impingement onto the substrate. It is theorized that the particles adhere to the substrate when their kinetic energy is converted to a sufficient level of thermal and mechanical deformation. Thus, it is believed that the particle velocity must be high enough to exceed the yield stress of the particle to permit it to adhere when it strikes the substrate. It was found that the deposition efficiency of a given particle mixture was increased as the inlet air temperature was increased. Increasing the inlet air temperature decreases its density and increases its velocity. The velocity varies approximately as the square root of the inlet air temperature. The actual mechanism of bonding of the particles to the substrate surface is not fully known at this time. It is believed that the particles must exceed a critical velocity prior to their being able to bond to the substrate. The critical velocity is dependent on the material of the particle and to a lesser degree on the material of the substrate. It is believed that the initial particles to adhere to a substrate have broken the oxide shell on the substrate material permitting subsequent metal to metal bond formation between plastically deformed particles and the substrate. Once an initial layer of particles has been formed on a substrate subsequent particles bind not only to the voids between previous particles bound to the substrate but also engage in particle to particle bonds. The bonding process is not due to melting of the particles in the air stream because while the temperature of the air stream may be above the melting point of the particles, due to the short exposure time the particles are never heated to a temperature above their melt temperature. This feature is considered critical because the kinetic spray process allows one to deposit particles onto a surface with out a phase transition.




This work improved upon earlier work by Alkimov et al. as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,414, issued Apr. 12, 1994. Alkimov et al. disclosed producing dense continuous layer coatings with powder particles having a particle size of from 1 to 50 microns using a supersonic spray.




The Van Steenkiste articles reported on work conducted by the National Center for Manufacturing Sciences (NCMS) and by the Delphi Research Labs to improve on the earlier Alkimov process and apparatus. Van Steenkiste et al. demonstrated that Alkimov's apparatus and process could be modified to produce kinetic spray coatings using particle sizes of greater than 50 microns.




The modified process and apparatus for producing such larger particle size kinetic spray continuous layer coatings are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913, and 6,283,386. The process and apparatus described provide for heating a high pressure air flow and combining this with a flow of particles. The heated air and particles are directed through a de Laval-type nozzle to produce a particle exit velocity of between about 300 m/s (meters per second) to about 1000 m/s. The thus accelerated particles are directed toward and impact upon a target substrate with sufficient kinetic energy to impinge the particles to the surface of the substrate. The temperatures and pressures used are sufficiently lower than that necessary to cause particle melting or thermal softening of the selected particle. Therefore, as discussed above, no phase transition occurs in the particles prior to impingement. It has been found that each type of particle material has a threshold critical velocity that must be exceeded before the material begins to adhere to the substrate by the kinetic spray process.




One difficulty associated with all of these prior art kinetic spray systems arises from defects in the substrate surface. When the surface has an imperfection in it the kinetic spray coating may develop a conical shaped defect over the surface imperfection. The conical defect that develops in the kinetic spray coating is stable and can not be repaired by the kinetic spray process, hence the piece must be discarded. A second difficulty arises when the substrate is a softer plastic or a soft ceramic composite. These materials can not be coated by a kinetic spray process because the particles being sprayed bury themselves below the surface rather than deforming and adhering to the surface.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In one embodiment, the present invention is a method of coating a substrate comprising the steps of: providing particles of a material to be sprayed; providing a supersonic nozzle having a throat located between a converging region and a diverging region, directing a flow of a gas through the nozzle, and injecting the particles into the nozzle and entraining the particles in the flow of the gas; maintaining the gas at a temperature insufficient to heat the particles to a temperature at or above their melting temperature in the nozzle and accelerating the particles to a velocity sufficient to result in adherence of the particles on a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle; and maintaining the gas at a temperature sufficiently high to heat the particles to a temperature at or above their melting temperature in the nozzle thereby melting the particles and entraining the molten particles in the flow of the gas and directing the entrained molten particles at a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:





FIG. 1

is a generally schematic layout illustrating a kinetic spray system for performing the method of the present invention;





FIG. 2

is an enlarged cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a kinetic spray nozzle used in the system; and





FIG. 3

is an enlarged cross-sectional view of an alternative embodiment of a kinetic spray nozzle used in the system.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT




The present invention comprises an improvement to the kinetic spray process as generally described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913, 6,283,386 and the articles by Van Steenkiste, et al. entitled “kinetic Spray Coatings” published in Surface and Coatings Technology Volume III, Pages 62-72, Jan. 10, 1999, and “Aluminum coatings via kinetic spray with relatively large powder particles” published in Surface and Coatings Technology 154, pages 237-252, 2002 all of which are herein incorporated by reference.




Referring first to

FIG. 1

, a kinetic spray system according to the present invention is generally shown at


10


. System


10


includes an enclosure


12


in which a support table


14


or other support means is located. A mounting panel


16


fixed to the table


14


supports a work holder


18


capable of movement in three dimensions and able to support a suitable workpiece formed of a substrate material to be coated. The enclosure


12


includes surrounding walls having at least one air inlet, not shown, and an air outlet


20


connected by a suitable exhaust conduit


22


to a dust collector, not shown. During coating operations, the dust collector continually draws air from the enclosure


12


and collects any dust or particles contained in the exhaust air for subsequent disposal.




The spray system


10


further includes an air compressor


24


capable of supplying air pressure up to 3.4 MPa (500 psi) to a high pressure air ballast tank


26


. The air ballast tank


26


is connected through a line


28


to both a powder feeder


30


and a separate air beater


32


. The air heater


32


supplies high pressure heated air, the main gas described below, to a kinetic spray nozzle


34


. The powder feeder


30


mixes particles of a spray powder with unheated air and supplies the mixture to a supplemental inlet line


48


of the nozzle


34


. A computer control


35


operates to control both the pressure of air supplied to the air heater


32


and the temperature of the heated main gas exiting the air heater


32


. The main gas can comprise air, argon, nitrogen helium and other inert gases.





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of the nozzle


34


and its connections to the air heater


32


and the supplemental inlet line


48


. A main air passage


36


connects the air heater


32


to the nozzle


34


. Passage


36


connects with a premix chamber


38


which directs air through a flow straightener


40


and into a mixing chamber


42


. Temperature and pressure of the air or other heated main gas are monitored by a gas inlet temperature thermocouple


44


in the passage


36


and a pressure sensor


46


connected to the mixing chamber


42


.




This embodiment of the nozzle


34


requires a high pressure powder feeder


30


. With this nozzle


34


and supplemental inlet line


48


set up the powder feeder


30


must have pressure sufficient to overcome that of the heated main gas. The mixture of unheated high pressure air and coating powder is fed through the supplemental inlet line


48


to a powder injector tube


50


comprising a straight pipe having a predetermined inner diameter. When the particles have an average nominal diameter of from 50 to 106 microns it is preferred that the inner diameter of the tube 50 range from 0.4 to 3.0 millimeters. When larger particles of 106 to 250 microns are used it is preferable that the inner diameter of the tube 50 range from 0.40 to 0.90 millimeters. The tube


50


has a central axis


52


that is preferentially the same as the axis of the premix chamber


38


. The tube


50


extends through the premix chamber


38


and the flow straightener


40


into the mixing chamber


42


.




Mixing chamber


42


is in communication with the de Laval type supersonic nozzle


54


. The nozzle


54


has an entrance cone


56


that forms a converging region which decreases in diameter to a throat


58


. Downstream of the throat is a diverging region that ends in an exit end


60


. The largest diameter of the entrance cone


56


may range from 10 to 6 millimeters, with 7.5 millimeters being preferred. The entrance cone


56


narrows to the throat


58


. The throat


58


may have a diameter of from 3.5 to 1.5 millimeters, with from 3 to 2 millimeters being preferred. The portion of the nozzle


54


from downstream of the throat


58


to the exit end


60


may have a variety of shapes, but in a preferred embodiment it has a rectangular cross-sectional shape. When particles of from 50 to 106 microns are used the length from the throat


58


to the exit end


60


can range from 60.0 to 80.0 millimeters, however, when particles of from 106 to 250 microns are used then preferably the distance from the throat


58


to the exit end


60


ranges from 200.0 to 400.0 millimeters. At the exit end


60


the nozzle


54


preferably has a rectangular shape with a long dimension of from 8 to 14 millimeters by a short dimension of from 2 to 6 millimeters.




As disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913 and 6,283,386 the powder injector tube


50


supplies a particle powder mixture to the system


10


under a pressure in excess of the pressure of the heated main gas from the passage


36


using the nozzle


54


shown in FIG.


2


. The nozzle


54


produces an exit velocity of the entrained particles of from 300 meters per second to as high as 1200 meters per second. The entrained particles gain kinetic and thermal energy during their flow through this nozzle


54


. It will be recognized by those of skill in the art that the temperature of the particles in the gas stream will vary depending on the particle size and the main gas temperature. The main gas temperature is defined as the temperature of heated high-pressure gas at the inlet to the nozzle


54


.





FIG. 3

is a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of the nozzle


34


and its connections to the air heater


32


and the powder feeder


30


. A main air passage


36


connects the air heater


32


to the nozzle


34


. Passage


36


connects with a premix chamber


38


that directs air through a flow straightener


40


and into a chamber


42


. Temperature and pressure of the air or other heated main gas are monitored by a gas inlet temperature thermocouple


44


in the passage


36


and a pressure sensor


46


connected to the chamber


42


.




Chamber


42


is in communication with a de Laval type supersonic nozzle


54


. The nozzle


54


has a central axis


52


and an entrance cone


56


that decreases in diameter to a throat


58


. The entrance cone


56


forms a converging region of the nozzle


54


. Downstream of the throat


58


is an exit end


60


and a diverging region is defined between the throat


58


and the exit end


60


. The largest diameter of the entrance cone


56


may range from 10 to 6 millimeters, with 7.5 millimeters being preferred. The entrance cone


56


narrows to the throat


58


. The throat


58


may have a diameter of from 3.5 to 1.5 millimeters, with from 3 to 2 millimeters being preferred. The diverging region of the nozzle


54


from downstream of the throat


58


to the exit end


60


may have a variety of shapes, but in a preferred embodiment it has a rectangular cross-sectional shape. At the exit end


60


the nozzle


54


preferably has a rectangular shape with a long dimension of from 8 to 14 millimeters by a short dimension of from 2 to 6 millimeters.




The de Laval nozzle


54


of

FIG. 3

is modified from the embodiment shown in

FIG. 2

in the diverging region. In this embodiment, a mixture of heated or unheated low pressure air and coating powder is fed from the powder feeder


30


through one of a plurality of supplemental inlet lines


48


each of which is connected to a powder injector tube


50


comprising a tube having a predetermined inner diameter, described above. For simplicity the actual connections between the powder feeder


30


and the inlet lines


48


are not shown. The injector tubes


50


supply the particles to the nozzle


54


in the diverging region downstream from the throat


58


, which is a region of reduced pressure, hence, in this embodiment the powder feeder


30


can be a low pressure powder feeder, discussed below. The length of the nozzle


54


from the throat


58


to the exit end can vary widely and typically ranges from 100 to 400 millimeters.




As would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art the number of injector tubes


50


, the angle of their entry relative to the central axis


52


and their position downstream from the throat


58


can vary depending on any of a number of parameters. In

FIG. 3

ten injector tubes


50


are show, but the number can be as low as one and as high as the available room of the diverging region. The angle relative to the central axis


52


can be any that ensures that the particles are directed toward the exit end


60


, basically from 1 to about 90 degrees. It has been found that an angle of 45 degrees relative to central axis


52


works well. As for the embodiment of

FIG. 2

, the inner diameter of the injector tube


50


can vary between 0.4 to 3.0 millimeters. The use of multiple injector tubes


50


in this nozzle


54


permits one to easily modify the system


10


. One can rapidly change particles by turning off a first powder feeder


30


connected to a first injector tube


50


and the turning on a second powder feeder


30


connected to a second injector tube


50


. Such a rapid change over is not easily accomplished with the embodiment shown in FIG.


2


. For simplicity only one powder feeder


30


is shown in

FIG. 1

, however, as would be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art, the system


10


could include a plurality of powder feeders


30


. The nozzle


54


of

FIG. 3

also permits one to mix a number of powders in a single injection cycle by having a plurality of powder feeders


30


and injector tubes


50


functioning simultaneously. An operator can also run a plurality of particle populations, each having a different average nominal diameter, with the larger population being injected closer to the throat


58


relative to the smaller size particle populations and still get efficient deposition. The nozzle


54


of

FIG. 3

will permit an operator to better optimize the deposition efficiency of a particle or mixture of particles. For example, it is known that harder materials have a higher critical velocity, therefore in a mixture of particles the harder particles could be introduced at a point closer to the throat


58


thereby giving a longer acceleration time.




Using a de Laval nozzle


54


like that shown in

FIG. 3

having a length of 300 millimeters from throat


58


to exit end


60


, a throat of 2 millimeters and an exit end


60


with a rectangular opening of 5 by 12.5 millimeters the pressure drops quickly as one goes downstream from the throat


58


. The measured pressures were: 14.5 psi at 1 inch after the throat


58


; 20 psi at 2 inches from the throat


58


; 12.8 psi at 3 inches from the throat


58


; 9.25 psi at 4 inches from the throat


58


; 10 psi at 5 inches from the throat


58


and below atmospheric pressure beyond 6 inches from the throat


58


. These results show why one can use much lower pressures to inject the powder when the injection takes place after the throat


58


. The low pressure powder feeder


30


that can be used with the nozzle


54


of

FIG. 3

has a cost that is approximately ten-fold lower than the high pressure powder feeders


30


that need to be used with the nozzle


34


of FIG.


2


. Generally, the low pressure powder feeder


30


is used at a pressure of 100 psi or less. All that is required is that it exceed the main gas pressure at the point of injection.




The system


10


of the present invention differs from the prior art systems because it can operate in two modes. In a first mode it operates as a typical kinetic spray system. In a second mode it operates as a thermal spray system. This dual mode capacity is made possible by using an air heater


32


that is capable of achieving higher temperatures than a typical kinetic spray system. This higher capacity air heater


32


may require that the main air passage


36


, supplemental inlet lines


48


, tubes


50


and nozzle


34


be made of high heat resistant materials.




When operating in the kinetic spray mode the computer control


35


and the thermocouple


44


interact to monitor and maintain the main gas at a temperature that is always insufficient to cause melting in the nozzle


34


of any particles being sprayed. Even in this mode, the main gas temperature can be well above the melt temperature of the particles and may range from at least 300 to at least 3000 degrees Celsius. Main gas temperatures that are 5 to 7 fold above the melt temperature of the particles have been used in the present system


10


. What is necessary is that the temperature and exposure time to the main gas be selected such that the particles do not melt in the nozzle


34


. The temperature of the gas rapidly falls as it travels through the nozzle


34


. In fact, the temperature of the gas measured as it exits the nozzle


34


is often at or below room temperature even when its initial temperature is above 1000° F.




Since in the kinetic mode the temperature of the particles is always less than the melting point of the particles, even upon impact on a substrate placed opposite the nozzle


34


, there is no change in the solid phase of the original particles due to transfer of kinetic and thermal energy, and therefore no change in their original physical properties.




Upon striking a substrate opposite the nozzle


54


the kinetic sprayed particles flatten into a nub-like structure with an aspect ratio of generally about 5 to 1. When the substrate is a metal and the particles are a metal the particles striking the substrate surface fracture the oxidation on the surface layer and subsequently form a direct metal-to-metal bond between the metal particle and the metal substrate. Upon impact the kinetic sprayed particles transfer substantially all of their kinetic and thermal energy to the substrate surface and stick if their yield stress has been exceeded. As discussed above, for a given particle to adhere to a substrate during the kinetic spray mode it is necessary that it reach or exceed its critical velocity which is defined as the velocity where at it will adhere to a substrate when it strikes the substrate after exiting the nozzle. This critical velocity is dependent on the material composition of the particle. In general, harder materials must achieve a higher critical velocity before they adhere to a given substrate. It is not known at this time exactly what is the nature of the particle to substrate bond; however, it is believed that a portion of the bond is due to the particles plastically deforming upon striking the substrate.




As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,139,913 the substrate material may be comprised of any of a wide variety of materials including a metal, an alloy, a semi-conductor, a ceramic, a plastic, and mixtures of these materials. Other substrates include wood and paper. All of these substrates can be coated by the process of the present invention in either mode of operation. The particles used in the present invention may comprise any of the materials disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,139,913 and 6,283,386 in addition to other known particles. These particles generally comprise metals, alloys, ceramics, polymers, diamonds and mixtures of these. Preferably the particles used have an average nominal diameter of from 60 to 250 microns. Mixtures of different sized or different material compositions of particles can also be used in the system


10


either by providing them as a mixture or using multiple tubes


50


and the nozzle


54


shown in FIG.


3


.




When the system


10


is operating in the thermal spray mode the computer control


35


and the thermocouple


44


interact to monitor and maintain the main gas at a temperature that is always sufficient to cause melting in the nozzle


34


of any particles being sprayed. Thus, the particles exit the nozzle


34


in a molten state and strike the substrate while molten. After striking the substrate the molten particles flatten and adhere to the substrate. The system


10


allows one to thermally spray the same types of particles onto the same types of substrates. During a given coating operation the system


10


can be oscillated between the two modes as desired. Preferably when in the thermal spray mode the system


10


heats the particles to a temperature of from the melting point of the particles to 400 degrees Celsius above the melting point of the particles, more preferably from the melting point of the particles to 200 degrees Celsius above the melting point of the particles, and most preferably from the melting point of the particles to 100 degrees Celsius above the melting point of the particles. To accomplish this the air heater


32


is selected to have a higher heating capacity. The air heater


32


can comprise any of a number of designs including a thermal plasma heater, it may include a combustion chamber, and it may be a high temperature resistive heater element. All of these systems are known in the art. The air heater


32


just needs to be able to oscillate between the kinetic spray mode and the thermal spray mode and to be able to heat the particles to temperatures above their melt points during their passage through the nozzle


34


for the thermal spray mode.




The system


10


permits a user to solve two difficulties with conventional kinetic spray systems, namely healing defective kinetic spray coatings and permitting kinetic spray coatings on softer materials. As discussed in the background above, one problem with kinetic spray systems is that if the substrate surface has any defects or imperfections these can cause conical defects in the kinetic spray applied coating. The defects appear as a right circular cone. This defect is stable in that with continued kinetic spray application the defect just becomes more evident. With a typical kinetic spray system the coating would have to be discarded and a new one begun. With the present system


10


this problem can be solved in two ways. First, the substrate can be sprayed initially in the thermal spray mode to provide a thin coating that covers the surface defects and provides a better surface, which allows kinetically sprayed particles to plastically deform and bond to the better surface, then the system


10


can be switched into the kinetic spray mode to build up a kinetic spray coating on the substrate. Second, should defects become evident during the coating process while the system


10


is operating in the kinetic spray mode, the system


10


can be oscillated into the thermal spray mode to “heal” the defect by filling it in and then the system


10


can be returned to the kinetic spray mode. In this fashion, because the time in the thermal spray mode is relatively short, the substrate is not subjected to the large thermal stresses that can occur with prolonged thermal spray application. Some of this thermal stress Would be relieved by the subsequent peening effect of the kinetically sprayed particles.




The system


10


also allows a user to apply a kinetic spray coating to soft materials. Such materials may comprise certain plastics and ceramic composites. With a conventional kinetic spray system some of these materials can not be coated because the particles tend to bury themselves below the surface of the substrate rather than plastically deforming and coating the substrate. With the present system


10


a user initially applies a thin coating of the particles in the thermal spray mode and then oscillates to the kinetic spray mode to complete the coating.




An additional advantage of the nozzle


54


shown in

FIG. 3

is that by injecting the particles after the throat


58


the potential for plugging the throat


58


is avoided. Plugging of the throat


58


can occur with the nozzle


54


design shown in FIG.


2


.




While the preferred embodiment of the present invention has been described so as to enable one skilled in the art to practice the present invention, it is to be understood that variations and modifications may be employed without departing from the concept and intent of the present invention as defined in the following claims. The preceding description is intended to be exemplary and should not be used to limit the scope of the invention. The scope of the invention should be determined only by reference to the following claims.



Claims
  • 1. A method of coating a substrate comprising the steps of:a) providing particles of a material to be sprayed; b) providing a supersonic nozzle having a throat located between a converging region and a diverging region, directing a flow of a gas through the nozzle, and injecting the particles into the nozzle and entraining the particles in the flow of the gas; c) maintaining the gas at a temperature insufficient to heat the particles to a temperature at or above their melting temperature in the nozzle and accelerating the particles to a velocity sufficient to result in adherence of the particles on a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle; and d) maintaining the gas at a temperature sufficiently high to heat the particles to a temperature at or above their melting temperature in the nozzle thereby melting the particles and entraining the molten particles in the flow of the gas and directing the entrained molten particles at a substrate positioned opposite the nozzle.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein step a) comprises providing particles having an average nominal diameter of from 50 to 250 microns.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein step a) comprises providing particles having an average nominal diameter of from 106 to 250 microns.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein step a) comprises providing at least two different types of particles differing in at least one of size or material composition.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises providing air, argon, nitrogen, or helium as the gas.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) comprises providing the gas at a temperature of from 300 degrees Celsius to a temperature that is seven fold above the melting temperature of the particles.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises injecting the particles into the converging region of the nozzle prior to the throat.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises injecting the particles directly into the diverging region of the nozzle after the throat.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises injecting a plurality of different types of particles differing in at least one of size or material composition directly into the diverging region each at a different location.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) comprises accelerating the particles to a velocity of from 300 to 1500 meters per second.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein step d) comprises heating the particles to a temperature of from their melting temperature to a temperature 400 degrees Celsius above their melting temperature.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein step d) comprises heating the particles to a temperature of from their melting temperature to a temperature 200 degrees Celsius above their melting temperature.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein step d) comprises heating the particles to a temperature of from their melting temperature to a temperature 100 degrees Celsius above their melting temperature.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein step c) is carried out prior to step d) to produce a laminate on the substrate of a kinetic spray applied layer and a thermal spray applied layer.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein step d) is carried out prior to step c) to produce a laminate on the substrate of a thermal spray applied layer and a kinetic spray applied layer.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein steps c) and d) comprise positioning a substrate comprising a metal, an alloy, a ceramic, a plastic, a semi-conductor, wood, paper, or mixtures thereof opposite the nozzle.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein step a) comprises providing particles comprising a metal, an alloy, a ceramic, a polymer, or mixtures of thereof.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises injecting the particles through a tube having an inner diameter of from 0.4 to 3.0 millimeters in diameter.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises providing a nozzle having a diverging region with a length of from 60.0 to 400.0 millimeters in length.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein step b) comprises providing a nozzle having a throat with a diameter of from 1.5 to 3.5 millimeters.
Parent Case Info

This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/252,203 filed Sep. 23, 2002 now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (33)
Number Name Date Kind
3100724 Rocheville Aug 1963 A
3993411 Babcock et al. Nov 1976 A
4263335 Wagner et al. Apr 1981 A
4606495 Stewart, Jr. et al. Aug 1986 A
4891275 Knoll Jan 1990 A
4939022 Palanisamy Jul 1990 A
5187021 Vydra et al. Feb 1993 A
5271965 Browning Dec 1993 A
5302414 Alkhimov et al. Apr 1994 A
5308463 Hoffmann et al. May 1994 A
5340015 Hira et al. Aug 1994 A
5395679 Myers et al. Mar 1995 A
5424101 Atkins et al. Jun 1995 A
5464146 Zalvzec et al. Nov 1995 A
5476725 Papich et al. Dec 1995 A
5527627 Lautzenhiser et al. Jun 1996 A
5593740 Strumban et al. Jan 1997 A
5648123 Kuhn et al. Jul 1997 A
5795626 Gabel et al. Aug 1998 A
5854966 Kampe et al. Dec 1998 A
5875626 Cromartie Mar 1999 A
5894054 Poruchuri et al. Apr 1999 A
5907761 Tohma et al. May 1999 A
5952056 Jordan et al. Sep 1999 A
5965193 Ning et al. Oct 1999 A
5989310 Chu et al. Nov 1999 A
6033622 Maruyama Mar 2000 A
6051045 Narula et al. Apr 2000 A
6051277 Claussen et al. Apr 2000 A
6074737 Jordan et al. Jun 2000 A
6129948 Plummet et al. Oct 2000 A
6139913 Van Steenkiste et al. Oct 2000 A
6283386 Van Steenkiste et al. Sep 2001 B1
Non-Patent Literature Citations (16)
Entry
Van Steenkiste, et al; Kinetic Spray Coatings; in Surface & Coatings Technology III; 1999; pp. 62-71.
Liu, et al; Recent Development in the Fabrication of Metal Matrix-Particulate Composites Using Powder Metallurgg Tecniques; in Journal of Material Science 29; 1994; pp. 1999-2007; National University of Singapore, Japan, (no month avail.).
Papyrin; The Cold Gas-Dynamic Spraying Method a New Method for Coatings Deposition Promises a New Generation of Technologies; Novosibirsk, Russia, (no date avail.).
McCune, al; Characterization of Copper and Steel Coatings Made by the Cold Gas-Dynamic Spray Method; National Thermal Spray Conference, (no date avail.).
Alkhimov, et al; A Method of “Cold” Gas-Dynamic Deposition; Sav. Phys. Kokl. 36(12; Dec. 1990; pp. 1047-1049.
Dykuizen, et al; Impact of High Velocity Cold Spray Particles; in Journal of Thermal Spray Technology 8(4); 1999; pp. 559-564, (no month avail.).
Swartz, et al; Thermal Resistance At Interfaces; Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 51, No. 26,28; Dec. 1987; pp. 2201-2202.
Davis, et al; Thermal Conductivity of Metal-Matrix Composiites; J.Appl. Phys. 77 (10), May 15, 1995; pp. 4494-4960.
Stoner et al; Measurements of the Kapitza Conductance between Diamond and Several Metals; Physical Review Letters, vol. 68, No. 10; Mar. 9, 1992; pp. 1563-1566.
Stoner et al; Kapitza conductance and heat flow between solids at temperatures from 50 to 300K; Physical Review B, vol. 48, No. 22, Dec. 1, 1993-II; pp. 16374;16387.
Johnson et al; Diamond/Al metal matrix composites formed by the pressureless metal infiltration process; J. Mater, Res., vol. 8, No. 5, May 1993; pp. 11691173.
Rajan et al; Reinforcement coatings and interfaces in Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites; pp. 3491-3503, (no date avail.).
LEC Manufacturing and Engineering Capabilities; Lanxide Electronic Components, Inc., (no date avail.).
Dykhuizen et al; Gas Dynamic Priniciples of Cold Spray; Journal of Thermal Spray Technology; 06-98; pp. 205-212, (no month avail.).
McCune et al; An Exploration of the Cold Gas-Dynamic Spray Method For Several Materials Systems,(no date avail.).
Ibrahim et al; Particulate Reinforced Metal Matrix Composites—A Review; Journal of Matrials Science 26; pp. 1137-1156,(no date avail.).
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10/252203 Sep 2002 US
Child 10/417495 US