The disclosure of the present patent application relates to construction techniques, and particularly to a method and system for connecting a circular concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) column to a reinforced concrete (RC) footing.
Concrete-filled steel tubes (CFSTs) are structural members for carrying heavy loads and are often used as piers in bridges and as columns in high-rise buildings. The steel tubes serve as formwork and reinforcement for the concrete fill, eliminating the need for flexible reinforcing cages, shoring and temporary formwork, as well as increasing safety and reducing labor costs, which consequently speeds up construction. The steel tube provides confinement and shear strength to the concrete fill, thus increasing the load carrying capacity of the CFST columns. Further, the use of CFST columns provides large economic savings by increasing the usable floor area through a reduction in the required cross-sectional size. This latter consideration is very important in the design of high-rise buildings in cities, where the cost of letting spaces is extremely high.
One of the most challenging problems in the adoption of CFSTs in construction is related to the connection detailing between CFST columns with other structural members, particularly the foundation. Although several types of connections are presently employed, there remains a need for connections that can be integrated with precast elements, which are also able to develop the strength and stiffness required for carrying gravity loads, as well as the large ductility cycles required for seismic designs. Thus, a method of connecting a circular concrete-filled steel tubular column to a reinforced concrete footing solving the aforementioned problems is desired.
The method of connecting a circular concrete-filled steel tubular column to a reinforced concrete footing provides a process for constructing a circular concrete-filled steel tubular column anchored in a reinforced concrete footing. A block of reinforced concrete having opposed top and bottom surfaces has a cavity formed therein. The cavity has an open upper end, a closed lower base surface, and at least one sidewall defined within the block of reinforced concrete. The open upper end of the cavity is contiguous with the top surface of the block of reinforced concrete and has an elliptical contour. The closed lower base surface is circular, such that the length of a major axis of the elliptical upper opening of the cavity is equal to the diameter of the circular base of the cavity. The at least one sidewall may have a corrugated internal surface.
A tubular member is partially embedded in the block of reinforced concrete at the base of the cavity. The tubular member has a cylindrical sidewall and open upper and lower ends, and further includes at least one pair of diametrically opposed flanges mounted on the open upper end, extending radially outward therefrom. The tubular member is embedded in the block of reinforced concrete such that the at least one pair of diametrically opposed flanges are raised slightly above the base of the cavity.
The column is a steel tube having a cylindrical sidewall. An elliptical base plate is mounted, e.g., by welding, on the open lower end of the cylindrical column. The elliptical base plate has a central circular opening aligned with and in open communication with the open lower end of the cylindrical sidewall of the column. At least one pair of diametrically opposed flange slots or brackets project from the lower surface of the elliptical base plate. The length of the major axis of the elliptical base plate is equal to the length of the major axis of the elliptical opening of the upper end of the cavity.
After hardening of the reinforced concrete block forming the footing, the base of the steel tube column is inserted into the cavity in the reinforced concrete footing such that the at least one pair of diametrically opposed flange slots are positioned circumferentially adjacent to the at least one pair of diametrically opposed flanges. The steel tube is then rotated about its axis so that the at least one pair of diametrically opposed flanges interlock with the at least one pair of flange slots projecting from the column's elliptical base plate. This rotation locks the steel tube in place with respect to the tubular member embedded in the footing. The cavity is then filled with concrete grout, and the steel tube is filled with concrete to form the circular concrete-filled steel tubular column.
These and other features of the present invention will become readily apparent upon further review of the following specification.
Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.
The method of connecting a circular concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) column to a reinforced concrete footing provides a process for constructing a circular concrete-filled steel tubular column anchored in a reinforced concrete footing. As shown by the forms for the reinforced concrete footing in
The major axis of open upper end 18 is aligned with the axis of maximum column moment. Rebars on the cavity surface (i.e., rebars embedded within the reinforced concrete footing in the surface defining the cavity 16) are formed in the shape of the cavity 16, which may be achieved by leaving a uniform clear cover on the surface of the cavity 16. In the cavity 16, the transition from the elliptical open upper end 18 to the circular, closed lower base 20 can be made in the reinforced concrete footing by using retrievable forms. The depth of the cavity 16 may vary from 50% to 150% of the outer diameter of the circular CFST column, depending upon the connection design. However, it should be understood that other geometries may be utilized. For example, the elliptical contour of the open upper end 18 may be replaced by a rectangular contour with rounded corners. In this case, the diameter of the circular closed base surface 20 would be equal to the length of the rectangle defining the open upper end 18.
As shown in
As shown in
After hardening of the reinforced concrete block, the steel tube 40 is partially inserted into cavity 16 such that the at least one pair of diametrically opposed flange slots 52 are positioned circumferentially adjacent to and below the at least one pair of diametrically opposed flanges 38. As noted above, only a single exemplary pair of flanges 38 is shown, although multiple pairs of such flanges may be provided. The number of pairs of flanges selected should match the number of flange slots or brackets 52 mounted on the lower surface of the base plate 48. For example, if three pairs of flanges 38 are provided on tubular member 30, then a corresponding three pairs of flange slots or brackets 52 (defining three corresponding slots 54) will be mounted to the lower surface 51 of elliptical base plate 48.
As shown in
The bending of the CFST column under the action of lateral loads creates a force that tries to pull the circular CFST column out of the cavity 16. The above-described connection resists this pull, providing moment-resisting capacity to the column base through the mechanical interlock between the mating steel flanges 38 of the tubular member 30 and the slots 54 of the flange slots or brackets 52, which are welded underneath the elliptical base plate 48. This interlocking contributes significantly in resisting the column moments.
Further, even after a potential failure of the mechanical interlock (or severe deformation in the interlocking elements), the elliptical column base plate cannot be removed because the concrete grout 50 resists upward movement due to the negatively sloping interface between the reinforced concrete 10 and concrete grout 50, i.e., the sloping transition created by the elliptical open upper end 18 to the closed lower base 20, and their respective diameters, prevents concrete grout 50 from being drawn out of cavity 16. Further, as noted above, the corrugated interface between the reinforced concrete 10 and the cement grout 50, created by corrugation of sidewall 22, also resists the upward push of the cement grout 50.
In the above, it should be noted that proper clearances must be maintained between the coupling members for their free movement, although it is important to note that the clearances should not be too loose in order to avoid large slackness. Further, it should be noted that, as an alternative, the cavity, as described above, may be substantially cylindrical, allowing the corresponding column base plate to be circular rather than elliptical. As a further alternative, the flange-based interlocking connection may be removed altogether, thus removing the need for embedding the small steel tube in the first-stage concrete of the reinforced concrete footing. In this alternative, there would, correspondingly, be no need for the flange slots to be welded to the base plate of the steel tubular column. The column moment (i.e., bending) in this case would be resisted by the resistance provided by the negative slope of the cavity against pulling-off of the elliptical base plate.
It is to be understood that the method of connecting a circular concrete-filled steel tubular column to a reinforced concrete footing is not limited to the specific embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the generic language of the following claims enabled by the embodiments described herein, or otherwise shown in the drawings or described above in terms sufficient to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the claimed subject matter.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3913953 | Archer | Oct 1975 | A |
5012622 | Sato et al. | May 1991 | A |
5492429 | Hodges | Feb 1996 | A |
5826387 | Henderson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
20040040224 | Dayton | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20150225917 | Goto | Aug 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
04285211 | Oct 1992 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Lehman et al., “Foundation connections for circular concrete-filled tubes,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 78, Nov. 2012 (Year: 2012). |
Lehman et al., “Foundation connections for circular concrete-filled tubes,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, vol. 78, Nov. 2012, pp. 212-225. |