The present invention is in the field of building construction methods and, in particular, to methods for constructing mid- and high-rise buildings.
The construction of mid- to high-rise building structures has progressed dramatically over the past decades, with advances in materials, techniques, and analytical methods that enable the economical construction of structurally sound multistory buildings. High-rise structures have many advantages, particularly in an urban setting, including, for example, more productive use of limited land space, economies of scale for building owners and managers, relatively low construction costs per square foot of usable space, attractive and desirable living and/or working space for users, and reduction in urban sprawl for municipalities.
A construction method of choice, particularly in structures more than a few stories tall, utilizes a concrete shear core that functions as a primary structural element for the building. The concrete shear core is essentially a large, hollow, vertical column of reinforced concrete, located generally at an interior location in the building. The concrete shear core typically is a hollow rectangular column that extends along the entire height of the building. The concrete shear core provides a sturdy central structural member that, cooperatively with peripheral columns and transverse beams, reacts to the static and dynamic loads imposed by and on the building. The concrete shear core often houses many of the building services, such as the elevators, utilities, and the like.
Advantages of the concrete shear core construction are well known. For example, in a concrete shear core building, no structural steel bracing or moment connections are required, which are expensive and may interfere with functional and aesthetic aspects of the building. Also, the concrete shear core construction significantly reduces the need for structural steel per square foot of built space, while providing relatively large, column-free tenant space. The concrete shear core provides economic advantages in part because in-place rebar and concrete are cheaper than structural steel. The concrete shear core allows the perimeter structural steel columns to be relatively light, gravity-loaded columns only. The horizontal forces, e.g., forces generated from wind or earthquakes, are resisted substantially by the rigid concrete shear core. A well-designed concrete shear core construction provides a high performance, stiff building that is able to withstand dynamic loads, such as winds and the like, without producing undesirable motion that can be disconcerting to occupants of the building.
There are disadvantages to conventional concrete shear core construction, however. In particular, the construction of a conventional concrete core is relatively time-consuming and has a significant impact on the total time required to complete a building. The time required to complete the construction of a building is extremely important to the overall cost of the building and, therefore, reducing the total construction time is an important goal for controlling the overall cost of construction. The concrete shear core, constructed using conventional methods, typically requires approximately one week per floor to erect. Time-consuming steps required for the concrete shear core construction include moving the forms from floor to floor, setting the reinforcing bars in place (with appropriate overlap at each floor), pouring the concrete, and allowing the concrete to set. The corresponding structural steel and floor construction, in contrast, requires only about two to three days per tier (two floors) to erect. The peripheral structural steel relies on the concrete shear core for support and, therefore, in prior art construction methods, the peripheral steel structure must be erected only after the corresponding portion of the concrete shear core has been completed.
Because the per-floor time required to construct the concrete core is significantly greater than the per-floor time for the steel and floor assembly, often the steel erection work will be performed in stages. For example, after the concrete shear core reaches a desired height, the structural steel and floor work may begin and proceed simultaneously with the concrete shear core construction. When the structural steel construction catches up to the current progress on the shear core, the steelwork must be temporarily halted while the shear core is extended further. When the concrete shear core is completed to a second desired height, a second stage of steel construction may be started. Staging the steel erection work requires mobilization and demobilization of the steel-working equipment and work force, thereby further increasing the cost of construction.
Other disadvantages to conventional concrete shear core construction are that it typically requires rebuilding the core forms at story height transitions or using expensive self-climbing forms, and requires redundant construction equipment, such as temporary stair towers and hoists.
Referring now to
The concrete is then poured to the desired height within the volume defined by the forms 52 and permitted to set. The forms 52 are then moved up to the next floor. This may require the construction of supports for the forms and/or modification of the forms to define the next volume to be filled with concrete. Additional rebar and horizontal support members are then installed, and additional concrete is poured to the next desired height. This process is repeated to complete the concrete shear core. Using conventional methods, it takes about one week to construct one floor of the concrete shear core, depending on the configuration.
Once the concrete shear core is completed to a predetermined height, steel columns 54 are erected generally about the design perimeter of the building and at intermediate locations as required. Horizontal beams (not visible in
There remains a need, therefore, for a construction method for mid- and high-rise buildings that retains the advantages of the concrete shear core design while improving the speed and efficiency of constructing the concrete core.
An improved method for building concrete shear core buildings is disclosed that retains the well-known benefits of shear core buildings while overcoming many of the disadvantages, including permitting the concrete shear core to be completed at a pace similar to the pace of constructing the steel framing and floors. The method utilizes a steel erection structure that may be quickly erected and is sized to support multiple floors of the building cooperatively with the steel framing structure. The steel erection structure includes the steel reinforcing bar for the concrete shear core. The floors may be built up—for example, 7 to 9 floors up—before beginning pouring the concrete shear core, and then may be erected at a rapid pace due to the reinforcing bar being already in place, and the steel floors and related structure completed ahead of the concrete core. The steel framing and floors and the concrete shear core, may then proceed at a similar pace, to complete the building. If the concrete shear core is designed to support the building upon completion, without accounting for the additional structural support provided by the steel erection structure, then the steel erection structure provides redundant reinforcing, enhancing the structural integrity of the building.
The improved method includes building a steel erection subassembly including a number of vertical columns, horizontal beams, and rebar, and building peripheral framing structure, also including columns and horizontal beams. One or more of the floor structures may then be installed, cooperatively supported by the steel erection subassembly and the peripheral framing structure. When the structure is built to a desired height, the forms for defining the volume for the concrete shear core are positioned for the first pour, disposed about a portion of the rebar, and the concrete is poured to begin the concrete shear core structure.
In a preferred embodiment, the vertical columns of the steel erection subassembly are disposed between the forms, such that these columns are also substantially embedded in the concrete. The beams may be positioned adjacent the outer forms, such that the concrete flows into the volume defined in the inner side of the beams, thereby further locking the beams into place.
In the disclosed embodiment, the steel erection subassembly is made from a number of pre-assembled segments, each segment having two or more columns connected to two or more beams, and also having a number of steel reinforcing bars attached thereto. These segments are then lifted into place to define a structure, typically a rectangular cylindrical structure, which will define the concrete shear core.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
As discussed in detail below, the present invention is directed to a method for constructing concrete shear core buildings, wherein a central steel erection structure is provided that is adapted to support at least a portion of the peripheral steel structure and floors, such that the structural steel and floor construction may proceed ahead of the concrete shear core. The steel erection structure simplifies the building of the concrete shear core, as discussed in detail below, enabling the construction of the concrete shear core to proceed at a pace similar to the structural steel construction, thereby reducing the time required to erect medium- and high-rise concrete shear core structures.
As can best be seen by comparing
In a preferred embodiment of the method of the present invention, the steel erection structure 150 is sized, with a suitable design margin, to provide sufficient structural support for about ten floors of the building 100 during construction. It is contemplated that the concrete shear core 152 will be conventionally sized to provide the required support for the building 100, and that the steel erection structure 150 will therefore provide redundant support when the building 100 is complete. Alternatively, the steel erection structure 150 may be accounted for to reduce the material requirements in the concrete shear core 152. Although the preferred sizing of the steel erection structure 150 to support approximately ten floors of construction provides certain logistical benefits, it will be readily appreciated that the steel erection structure 150 may alternatively be designed to support more or fewer than ten floors of the building, without departing from the present invention.
In the preferred embodiment, the steel framing 104, disposed outwardly from the concrete shear core 152, and the floors 106 are sized by applying the same engineering principles as would be utilized in the conventional concrete shear core construction method described above with reference to
As shown in
It should now be appreciated that the assembled segments 154 and, in particular, the columns 156 and beams 158, define a sturdy and rigid structural element that may readily be designed to provide the structural support required for the peripheral steel framing 104 and floors 106 in a manner similar to all-steel buildings, i.e., buildings with a structural steel core rather than a concrete shear core. In the present method, however, the steel erection structure 150 is not designed to support the entire height of the building, but rather, it provides a temporary support during the construction of the concrete shear core 152. The steel erection structure 150 is therefore much less expensive than a steel core designed for an all-steel building.
It will also be apparent to the person of skill in the art that the segments 154 may be erected relatively quickly, as compared to a conventional concrete shear core structure. The utilization of the steel erection structure 150 greatly facilitates construction of the concrete shear core 152 and other portions of the building. For example, placement of the rebar for the concrete shear core using conventional methods is a time-consuming process. Using the present method, the rebar screens 157, pre-assembled into the segments 154, are readily placed. The construction and movement of the forms defining the concrete structure are also simplified, as discussed below. The rebar screens 157 are also preferably two floors in height rather than a single floor, simplifying construction. Finally, it is simpler to build the concrete shear core 152 when the floors above the concrete shear core are already in place, rather than building the tall concrete pillar common in the conventional construction method depicted in
In the preferred embodiment, the outer forms 170 are approximately one floor in height, such that the outer forms 170 fit between neighboring beams 158. The inner forms 172 are preferably two floors in height. As seen most clearly in
The inner forms 172 may be moved, for example, with a hoist 80, to each desired location. A plurality of transverse connecting members 174 interconnects the outer form 170 with the inner form 172, to hold them in place during the concrete pour. It will also be appreciated that with the preferred embodiment of the present method, the inner forms 172 only need to be moved once for every tier of construction.
The steel erection structure 150 of the present invention, therefore, simplifies the construction of the concrete shear core 152 for a number of independent reasons. The present method permits the steel framing and floors to proceed ahead of the concrete shear core 152. The placement of the rebar for the concrete shear core is simplified by pre-assembling the rebar onto the rigid segments 154. The rebar and steel erection structure 150 is two floors in height, reducing the number of rebar placements that must be made by approximately half, and reducing the number of rebar overlaps required. The forms 170, 172 for the concrete pour may be simplified and the inner forms may be two or more floors in height, reducing the number of times they must be moved.
In the preferred method of constructing a concrete shear core building according to the present invention, the construction of the concrete shear core 152 proceeds at a pace that is approximately the same as the pace required to construct the steel erection structure 150, steel framing 104, and steel floors 106. In particular, for a typical high-rise building, it has been found that the concrete shear core 152 can be built at a pace of two floors (one tier) every four days. Although in the preferred method the steel erection structure 150 and the steel framing 104 are constructed approximately seven to nine floors ahead of the concrete shear core 152, it will be appreciated that a greater or lesser gap between the steel structures 150, 104 and the concrete shear core 152 may alternatively be utilized, with suitable structural design of the steel structures 150, 104 according to well-known engineering principles.
It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, that the present method, wherein the construction of the steel framing 104 and of the floors 106 proceeds ahead of the concrete shear core 152, therefore will be completed earlier in the construction process than in buildings built utilizing conventional methods. This provides a number of additional advantages. For example, the building facing may be started earlier, since the framing is completed earlier. Also, the elevators may come on-line earlier in the construction process, potentially eliminating the need for temporary stair construction, personnel hoists, and the like. The need for self-climbing forms is eliminated, because the steel structure is in place before the concrete must be poured.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, it will be appreciated that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.