The present invention relates to a method for controlling a seat which is equipped with:
The invention further relates to a seat which is suitable for implementation of this method.
Passenger seats provided in aircraft are generally equipped with electrical actuators which allow different movable elements of the seat to be displaced relative to each other.
In order to ensure the safety of passengers during the critical phases of take-off or landing, it is imperative for the seat to be able to have an adequate level of rigidity, which prevents the seat from becoming deformed or becoming disengaged from the remainder of the aircraft in the event of a significant impact. The presence of only the actuators which connect the different elements of the seat is not always sufficient to meet these requirements for strength in the event of an impact.
Therefore, it is known to immobilise specific portions of the seat relative to each other using locks during critical phases of the flight of the aircraft. These locks are constituted, for example, by the movable core of an electromagnet whose winding is carried by a movable portion of the seat and whose movable core can be moved between a retracted position and an extended position for which it is engaged in the fixed portion of the seat, thus providing positive mechanical locking of the movement of the two portions of the seat relative to each other.
In arrangements of this type, the movable core of the electromagnet which forms the lock is received in a small catch which is provided in the complementary portion of the seat.
For the control thereof, the seat is provided with means for controlling the electromagnet so that, before the activation of the actuator which ensures the movement of the two portions relative to each other, the lock is retracted and, conversely, so that the extension of the lock is brought about when the actuator reaches a predetermined position in which the lock is in the catch in order to ensure the activation of the lock.
In practice, it has been found that, taking into account production tolerances of the seat and the actuators, and involuntary movements of the passenger in the seat which may occur, the movement of the lock to the retracted position thereof and/or to the extended position thereof is made difficult, even impossible, owing to the misalignment between the lock and the catch.
In the case of locking, the movement force of the electromagnet, which is relatively small, is often insufficient to disengage or position the lock.
The object of the invention is to provide a solution to this problem of movement of the lock.
To this end, the invention relates to a method for controlling a seat of the above-mentioned type, characterised in that it comprises, in the event of an order for modification of a command for the actuator, the steps for:
According to specific embodiments, the method comprises one or more of the following features:
The invention also relates to a vehicle seat comprising:
The invention will be better understood from a reading of the following description, given purely by way of example and with reference to the drawings, in which:
The seat 10 illustrated in
An actuator 20 is arranged between the underframe 18 and the floor in order to ensure the movement of the underframe 18 along the length of the rails 16. The actuator 20 is connected to a central control unit 22 which is in turn connected to a keypad 24 which allows the passenger sitting in the seat to move the seat by controlling the actuator 20.
As known per se, the actuator 20 is provided with means for measuring the position thereof and therefore the position of the seat along the length of the rails 16. This measuring means is formed, for example, by a potentiometer. It is connected to the control unit 22 in order to have continuous knowledge of the current position of the seat.
Furthermore, two locks 26 are mounted on the underframe 18. They are each constituted by the core of an electromagnet 27 whose winding 28 is fixedly joined to the underframe. The core 26 can be moved transversely relative to the direction of advance of the underframe between a retracted position in which it is remote from the associated rail 16 and an extended position in which it is engaged in a catch 30 which forms a stop and which is provided in the rail 16, thus providing positive mechanical locking of the movement of the underframe 18 relative to the rails 16.
The catch 30 and the lock 26 are illustrated schematically on a larger scale in
In this manner, the lock 26 in the extended position thereof can be engaged in the catch 30 for a plurality of positions of the underframe over a small movement range thereof in which the lock is opposite the catch 30. A first position of the electromagnet 27 is illustrated with solid lines in
The electromagnets 27 are each connected to the control unit 22 in order to control the extension of the cores 26 when the seat is in a safety position in which the locks must be engaged in the catch and in order to retract the cores 26 when the user controls the movement of the seat from this safety position to another position, in particular by controlling the actuator 20.
To this end, the central control unit 22 uses the algorithms which are illustrated in
During a phase for moving the underframe 18 by moving the actuator 20, whether it involves an advance phase or retraction phase, the lock 26 is retracted. During this operating phase, and as illustrated in
When a stop command of this type is detected, the actuator 20 is not immediately stopped and step 304 is implemented. During this step, the position of the actuator 20 and therefore the underframe 18 is determined in order to know whether or not the lock 26 is in the zone I.
If this is the case, the movement of the underframe 18 is continued at step 306, the actuator 20 still being controlled by the unit 22 in spite of the stop command of the user.
When the lock has left zone I, stopping of the actuator is brought about at step 308.
In this manner, by implementing the algorithm of
In this position, the extension of the lock is controlled automatically by the unit 22 as known per se.
If, before the stop command, the seat moves in an advance direction, whilst the lock enters the zone I, the advance of the seat is continued until the lock is outside the zone I, so that it is no longer opposite the catch, as illustrated by the electromagnet 27B with dotted lines in
As soon as an advance command is detected at step 402, the electromagnet is directly controlled at step 403; it is verified, at step 404, whether or not the lock 26 is in the zone I. If this is the case, the actuator 20 is controlled, at step 406, in the opposite direction in order to bring about the retraction of the underframe. The retraction command is continued until the lock leaves the zone I and is in the position 26A illustrated with dot-dash lines in
In this manner, using such methods, the lock is extended or retracted from the catch when it is remote from the ends of the catch. It can thus be displaced in spite of the low power of the electromagnet acting on the movable core. Furthermore, a sensor can allow the retraction of the lock to be controlled. If this sensor confirms the retraction of the lock, the step 406 is void or stops.
In a variant, the catch 30 formed by a hole in which the lock 26 is arranged is replaced with a rod which forms a stop for a lock in the form of a hook, the hook being able to be moved between a position in which the hook is engaged around the rod and a position disengaged from the rod.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 03795 | Apr 2006 | FR | national |