The invention relates to a method of controlling the injection of liquid into an inflow duct of a prime mover or driven machine, and also relates to a device for carrying out the method.
A gas is heated during its adiabatic compression. Due to the heating and the associated increase in volume, the requisite compression work is increased. This has various adverse consequences at the compressor of a gas turboset. The increased inlet temperature at the combustor can result in lower firing of the gas turboset. The compression requires a greater proportion of the turbine work and takes place at a poorer efficiency. In addition, cooling air branched off from the compressor is available only at an already greatly increased temperature level. Consequently, the output and efficiency potentials of the gas turboset are adversely affected.
Attempts are consequently made to limit this temperature increase, for example by intermediate-cooling stages during the compression. The “isothermal compression” is also of interest in this connection. The injection of a liquid, in particular water, into the compressor or into its inflow (the latter injection being especially simple to realize) in such a way that liquid droplets enter the compressor is in this case an especially simple means of achieving internal cooling of the compressor by the evaporation of this liquid. By a liquid being sprayed into the compressor or into the regions located upstream of the compressor, a similar cooling effect as with an intermediate-cooler heat exchanger can be achieved by the evaporation inside the compressor. This involves an approximation to the “quasi-isothermal compression.” On account of the lower temperatures achieved by means of the quasi-isothermal compression and the associated higher specific density of the gas to be compressed, less energy is required for the compression. FR 1563749 has already described the positive effects of the injection of liquid into compressors, but at the same time emphasizes the importance of fine atomization and uniform distribution of the liquid.
It is not actually unusual for water to penetrate into a compressor during operation, thus during the cleaning of a stationary gas turbine or in an aircraft engine when flying through clouds or rain. However, since permanent water injection could lead to problems on account of blade erosion, the sprayed liquid must be atomized very finely into very small droplets. Therefore the challenge with corresponding technical solutions has hitherto been to realize water spraying with very small droplets, normally 0.9-5 μm in diameter during “flash atomization” and 20-40 μm during high-pressure atomization. At the same time, the sprayed quantity of these droplets must be so large that it is sufficient for cooling the air during the compression.
WO 99/67519 discloses the “swirl-flash technology” for generating very fine droplets. It is based on the fundamental principle that a liquid is pressurized, superheated and then sprayed by means of a nozzle. The liquid, in particular water, discharges from the nozzle in a typical cone. The droplet size is approximately 25 μm. Since the temperature of the liquid is considerably above the boiling point at ambient pressure, spontaneous boiling occurs in such a way that each droplet, during the spraying process, explodes from 25 μm into about 1000 fragments having a size of approximately 2.5 μm.
For the intended purpose, the kinetics of the evaporation are also of importance. The retention time in a compressor is short. It is normally around 10 milliseconds for an axial-flow compressor, and is even lower for a radial-flow compressor. This means that the evaporation has to be effected within milliseconds. As already explained, the very fine droplets in combination with the high temperature permit the desired rapid evaporation.
A device and a method for spraying a cooling medium into the supply air flow of a gas turbine plant are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,930,990. In this case, the injection nozzles are fastened in a lattice shape on or in a tube carrier arrangement. This tube carrier arrangement, via which the nozzles are also supplied with liquid, may be arranged at various points in the inflow duct of the gas turboset. The nozzles may in this case be arranged as a function of the respective flow parameters. In addition, it is possible in each case to combine a plurality of nozzles to form a group, so that the injected liquid quantity can be adapted, for example, to the variable fresh-air flow by multistage switching-on of the nozzle groups. The variation in the liquid mass flow by multistage switching-on has the advantage that the pressure drop over the active nozzles and thus the atomizing quality remain largely constant during different liquid mass flows. On the other hand, the profile of the droplet load of the intake air may greatly vary and have steep gradients due to the switching-on and switching-off of various nozzle groups.
In addition to a suitable design of the nozzles, it is necessary to spray liquid droplets into the inflow as homogeneously as possible over the entire inflow cross section. In addition to the atomizing quality, FR 1563749 also mentions that the homogeneous, uniform distribution of the liquid introduced is also decisive. A distribution which is very uneven results in locally varying cooling in the compressor. The resulting warm and cold strands reduce the pumping distance (surge margin) of the compressor and in the extreme case may lead to the distortion of the casing.
The invention relates to a method of the type mentioned at the beginning which avoids the disadvantages of the prior art. In particular, the invention relates to a method which controls the liquid spraying in such a way that a profile of the droplet load which is as favorable as possible for the operation of the downstream compressor is produced, even during operation of only some of the injection nozzles.
The invention relates to controlling the injection of liquid in such a way that, if at all possible, a symmetrical pattern of the injection is produced. This is achieved by virtue of the fact that, on each side of a symmetry line of the injection device, liquid is admitted to so many nozzles that the sum of the partial mass flows passed through the individual atomizer nozzles is at least approximately the same on each side of the symmetry line. In this case, the expression “symmetry line” refers to a symmetry line of the injection device in the fitted state. That is to say that the injection device itself could also be asymmetrical, provided the inflow duct has a line at which it is at least approximately symmetrical; the symmetry of the inflow duct is then decisive—as is apparent to the person skilled in the art. To this end, the liquid feed to individual atomizer nozzles, or also to a plurality of atomizer nozzles combined to form a group, is preferably released or shut off selectively by a shut-off member. If all the atomizer nozzles have an identical throughflow behavior, that is to say the same relative partial mass flow, relative to the total mass flow of the entire injection device under the: same pressure conditions, liquid is admitted to the same number of atomizer nozzles preferably in mirror-image arrangement, on both sides of a symmetry line. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, a plurality of atomizer nozzles are combined to form at least one nozzle group and liquid is jointly admitted to them. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, in which at least a number of atomizer nozzles are arranged on at least one nozzle tube, liquid is jointly admitted to all the nozzles arranged on a nozzle tube. Furthermore, such a nozzle tube construction is assumed in particular in the exemplary embodiments. However, the statements made there in relation to the activation of nozzle tubes may readily be applied to the activation of individual nozzles or, to nozzles which are combined in groups and are not arranged on tubes.
In an injection device having a nozzle tube construction as disclosed per se by the prior art, the injection of liquid is controlled according to the invention in such a way that, on each side of a symmetry line of the injection device, liquid is admitted to so many tubes that the mass flows passed through the tubes are the same on each side of the symmetry line; admission of liquid to the nozzle tubes in mirror image is preferably effected. The admission of liquid is effected by the liquid feed to individual nozzle tubes, or also to a plurality of combined nozzle tubes, being preferably released or shut off by a shut-off member. In this case, the admission of liquid to a group of tubes may be effected by a plurality of shut-off members being operated simultaneously.
In an embodiment of the invention, the supply lines of the nozzles and/or tubes combined to form a group are brought together at a point situated upstream in such a way that all the nozzles and/or tubes of the group can be activated via a common shut-off member. In this case, the admission of liquid to individual nozzles and/or tubes via in each case separate shut-off members ensures greater flexibility of the injection pattern to be realized, whereas the activation of an entire group via a common shut-off member leads to a simplification in terms of equipment and control.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the pressure difference over the injection nozzles is kept constant. The liquid mass flow, in good approximation, is then proportional to the entire nozzle cross section to which liquid is admitted; provided that all the nozzles are identical, which is an advantageous aim, the liquid mass flow is proportional to the number of nozzles to which liquid is admitted. In a preferred embodiment, all the nozzles have an identical throughflow behavior. Furthermore, in one embodiment, all the tubes have an identical nozzle complement. The injected liquid mass flow is then proportional to the number of nozzles and/or tubes to which liquid is admitted. If this is not the case, an individual partial mass flow may be assigned to each tube. If pressure atomizer nozzles are used for spraying the liquid, the pressure drop over the nozzles is as a rule around a few 10 bar, for example 30-50 bar. In contrast, the pressure change in the inflow duct is negligible, so that it is sufficient as a rule for the supply pressure of the liquid in the tubes or in the feed line system to the nozzles and/or tubes to be kept constant. As a result, the mass flow delivered by a liquid pump can be controlled very simply in such a way that the supply pressure remains constant.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, liquid is admitted to nozzles and/or tubes arranged in mirror image to one another on each side of the symmetry axis. In a further embodiment, liquid is admitted to nozzles and/or tubes distributed as uniformly as possible over the cross section; for example, in an equidistant arrangement of the tubes, every second tube for 50% relative injection mass flow or every third tube for 33% relative injection mass flow. As indicated above, in a preferred variant of the invention, in each case a plurality of nozzles and/or tubes are combined to form a group and liquid is jointly admitted to them; it goes without saying that this also applies to the switching-off operation. In this case, the combining to form a group may be effected via the control of the method by provision being made for joint simultaneous switching of a plurality of shut-off members; on the other hand, a plurality of nozzles and/or tubes may be supplied from a common shut-off member, downstream of which the liquid feed line branches to individual nozzles and/or tubes. It is again advantageous in this case if nozzles and/or tubes are arranged in a group symmetrically to a symmetry line or center axis of the injection device.
In an embodiment of the invention, the nozzles and/or tubes are combined to form groups in such a way the relative group mass flow, also referred to below in short as group mass flow, that is to say the mass flow passed through the group, is constant in relation to the liquid mass flow of the entire injection device at identical pressures. Inca further embodiment, some of the groups have a first group mass flow, whereas at least one group has a smaller group mass flow, which in particular advantageously corresponds to around 50% of the first group mass flow. During an increase in the entire injection mass flow, liquid is then in each case always advantageously admitted to a second group having a small group mass flow, and, during a further increase in the total mass flow, a first group having a large group mass flow is switched on and at the same time the group having the smaller group mass flow is switched off. The mass flow increment during each switching operation then corresponds to the small group mass flow; however, the number of switching groups, compared with a switching operation in which all the groups have the small group mass flow and are operated sequentially, is virtually halved at the same mass flow increment.
Note that it is by no means necessary, for the groups to be mutually operated sequentially with time increments; it is even advantageous, if a certain mass flow is aimed at, to simultaneously operate all the groups necessary for this mass flow in order to increase the total mass flow over time in a single step. When mass flow increments and switching stages are referred to in connection with this invention, this refers to the sequence of the switching operation over the mass flow to be set. However, the latter can be set in a single step if the groups to be operated are known, so that there are no time increments. This is even advantageous in terms of operation, since the gas turboset is confronted only once with a transient change in the operating conditions and not several times in succession, as would be the case if the mass flow increments were to be switched on in time increments.
In a further preferred embodiment of the method, nozzles and/or tubes are combined to form groups in such a way and liquid is admitted to them in such a way that the group mass flows are geometrically graduated. In particular, a binary graduation of the group mass flows, with the ratio 2, is preferred here. In this case, the group mass flows relative to the smallest group mass flow behave like 1:2:4:8, and so forth; that is to say each group having a larger mass flow has twice the group mass flow as the group having the next smaller group mass flow. It is then possible, for example, to set 15 different equidistant total mass flows with only 4 controllable groups, or 31 equidistant mass flows with 5 groups. In general, with N groups graduated in a binary fashion, 2N−1 precisely equidistant mass flows can be realized.
With the present method, it is possible to graduate the injection quantity of the cooling medium in such a way as to be adapted to the operating mode, in particular the respectively deliverable or required output, of the prime mover or driven machine during operation thereof. Thus the various injection groups, to which the various injection nozzles are assigned, are switched on and/or off during the operation for increasing or reducing the cooling capacity in such a way that the change in the quantity of the injected cooling medium is possible in small steps from stage to stage, and consequently finely graduated mass flow desired values can be delivered.
With regard to the homogeneous spraying of the liquid, the flow zone in the inflow duct is preferably also to be taken into account. In this case, it is also of importance for the spraying of the liquid whether a laminar or a turbulent flow prevails at the corresponding injection points. In addition, it is to be taken into account that the flow velocities over the cross section of the intake duct are also variable. The spatial distribution of the injected liquid is effected in a further embodiment while taking into account these flow parameters.
The method according to the invention is explained in more detail below with reference to the drawing, in which, in detail:
    
    
    
    
    
  
  
  
    
      
        
        
        
        
          
            
            
          
          
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
          
        
        
          
            
          
        
      
      
        
        
        
        
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
          
        
      
    
  
In the light of the above comments, application to a different number of groups graduated in a binary fashion will be readily apparent to the person skilled in the art. Furthermore, it can be seen from 
  
  
    
      
        
        
        
        
          
            
          
          
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
          
        
        
          
            
          
        
      
      
        
        
        
        
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
            
            
          
          
            
          
        
      
    
  
Whereas switching scheme 2 has less asymmetry, switching scheme 1 requires fewer switching operations.
Note again that the switching schemes described in no way need to be operated in a time sequence, but rather all the groups necessary according to a switching scheme for a desired mass flow are advantageously operated simultaneously.
  
In the injection device shown in 
The embodiments explained in the exemplary embodiments do not of course constitute any restriction of the invention described in the claims; in particular, it is of course not imperative to operate the nozzles or tubes in groups. The equidistant arrangement, shown in 
  
| Number | Date | Country | Kind | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 102 56 193 | Dec 2002 | DE | national | 
This application is a continuation of the U.S. National Stage designation of co-pending International Patent Application PCT/EP2003/050901 filed Nov. 26, 2003, which claims priority to German patent application no. 102 56 193.1 filed Dec. 2, 2002, and the entire contents of these applications are expressly incorporated herein by reference thereto.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind | 
|---|---|---|---|
| 986308 | Ostergren | Mar 1911 | A | 
| 1265650 | Graemiger | May 1918 | A | 
| 1384570 | Schwarz | Jul 1921 | A | 
| 2115338 | Lysholm | Apr 1938 | A | 
| 2219994 | Jung | Oct 1940 | A | 
| 2322717 | Nettel | Jun 1943 | A | 
| 2365616 | Zweifel | Dec 1944 | A | 
| 2438998 | Halford | Apr 1948 | A | 
| 2469678 | Wyman | May 1949 | A | 
| 2469679 | Wyman | May 1949 | A | 
| 2489683 | Stalker | Nov 1949 | A | 
| 2648196 | Mullen, II et al. | Aug 1953 | A | 
| 2657530 | Lee, II | Nov 1953 | A | 
| 2678531 | Miller | May 1954 | A | 
| 2686631 | Jordan | Aug 1954 | A | 
| 2689452 | Jordan | Sep 1954 | A | 
| 2727734 | Vincent | Dec 1955 | A | 
| 2863282 | Torell | Dec 1958 | A | 
| 2869670 | Hoffman | Jan 1959 | A | 
| 2927423 | Wisniowski | Mar 1960 | A | 
| 2941356 | Blackman | Jun 1960 | A | 
| 2974482 | Kelley | Mar 1961 | A | 
| 3100964 | Bevers et al. | Aug 1963 | A | 
| 3353360 | Gorzegno | Nov 1967 | A | 
| 3359737 | Lewis | Dec 1967 | A | 
| 3623668 | Freid et al. | Nov 1971 | A | 
| 3630030 | Wagner | Dec 1971 | A | 
| 3693347 | Kydd et al. | Sep 1972 | A | 
| 3736074 | Kilbane et al. | May 1973 | A | 
| 3815356 | Burge et al. | Jun 1974 | A | 
| 3894691 | Mee | Jul 1975 | A | 
| 3936215 | Hoff | Feb 1976 | A | 
| 4002023 | Hartmann | Jan 1977 | A | 
| 4036028 | Mandrin | Jul 1977 | A | 
| 4196020 | Hornak et al. | Apr 1980 | A | 
| 4199295 | Raffy et al. | Apr 1980 | A | 
| 4260350 | Russell, Jr. | Apr 1981 | A | 
| 4281511 | Neale | Aug 1981 | A | 
| 4311439 | Stofen | Jan 1982 | A | 
| 4418527 | Schlom et al. | Dec 1983 | A | 
| 4478553 | Leibowitz et al. | Oct 1984 | A | 
| 4519207 | Okabe et al. | May 1985 | A | 
| 4569195 | Johnson | Feb 1986 | A | 
| 4572428 | Groff et al. | Feb 1986 | A | 
| 4667465 | Munk | May 1987 | A | 
| 4702074 | Munk | Oct 1987 | A | 
| 4731990 | Munk | Mar 1988 | A | 
| 4928478 | Maslak | May 1990 | A | 
| 5011540 | McDermott | Apr 1991 | A | 
| 5083423 | Prochaska et al. | Jan 1992 | A | 
| 5191767 | Kane et al. | Mar 1993 | A | 
| 5193976 | Kolev et al. | Mar 1993 | A | 
| 5203161 | Lehto | Apr 1993 | A | 
| 5273395 | McDermott | Dec 1993 | A | 
| 5282726 | Warren | Feb 1994 | A | 
| 5313783 | Althaus | May 1994 | A | 
| 5326254 | Munk | Jul 1994 | A | 
| 5353585 | Munk | Oct 1994 | A | 
| 5463873 | Early et al. | Nov 1995 | A | 
| 5481865 | Frutschi | Jan 1996 | A | 
| 5496012 | Kenny, III | Mar 1996 | A | 
| 5525268 | Reens | Jun 1996 | A | 
| 5537813 | Davis et al. | Jul 1996 | A | 
| 5560195 | Anderson et al. | Oct 1996 | A | 
| 5669217 | Anderson | Sep 1997 | A | 
| 5689948 | Frutschi | Nov 1997 | A | 
| 5758485 | Frutschi | Jun 1998 | A | 
| 5790972 | Kohlenberger | Aug 1998 | A | 
| 5839269 | Frutschi | Nov 1998 | A | 
| 5867977 | Zachary et al. | Feb 1999 | A | 
| 5884470 | Frutschi | Mar 1999 | A | 
| 5906095 | Frutschi | May 1999 | A | 
| 5930990 | Zachary et al. | Aug 1999 | A | 
| 6038848 | Frutschi | Mar 2000 | A | 
| 6178735 | Frutschi | Jan 2001 | B1 | 
| 6178738 | Frutschi | Jan 2001 | B1 | 
| 6199363 | Frutschi | Mar 2001 | B1 | 
| 6202399 | Frutschi | Mar 2001 | B1 | 
| 6216443 | Utamura | Apr 2001 | B1 | 
| 6223523 | Frutschi | May 2001 | B1 | 
| 6247302 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 | 
| 6250064 | Tomlinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 | 
| 6256976 | Kataoka et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 | 
| 6260350 | Horii et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 | 
| 6286301 | Utamura | Sep 2001 | B1 | 
| 6357236 | Utamura | Mar 2002 | B1 | 
| 6363709 | Kataoka et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 | 
| 6378284 | Utamura | Apr 2002 | B1 | 
| 6389799 | Hatamiya et al. | May 2002 | B1 | 
| 6397578 | Tsukamoto et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 | 
| 6463741 | Frutschi | Oct 2002 | B1 | 
| 6470667 | Payling et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 | 
| 6470668 | Payling et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 | 
| 6478289 | Trewin | Nov 2002 | B1 | 
| 6484508 | Rocklin et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 | 
| 6530210 | Horii et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 | 
| 6568167 | Horii et al. | May 2003 | B2 | 
| 6568168 | Horii et al. | May 2003 | B2 | 
| 6581368 | Utamura | Jun 2003 | B2 | 
| 6598401 | Utamura | Jul 2003 | B1 | 
| 6598402 | Kataoka et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 | 
| 6609360 | Utamura | Aug 2003 | B2 | 
| 6634165 | Tomlinson et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 | 
| 6640550 | Hoffmann et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 | 
| 6705074 | Horii et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 | 
| 6711888 | Horii et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 | 
| 6715916 | Tomlinson et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 | 
| 6779332 | Horii et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 | 
| 6805483 | Tomlinson et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 | 
| 6935119 | Placko et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 | 
| 6938405 | Carberg et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 | 
| RE38831 | Horii et al. | Oct 2005 | E | 
| 6973772 | Hatamiya et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 | 
| RE39092 | Horii et al. | May 2006 | E | 
| 7040083 | Horii et al. | May 2006 | B2 | 
| 7104749 | Frutschi | Sep 2006 | B2 | 
| 7104750 | Bolis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 | 
| 7146794 | Hatamiya et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 | 
| 7353654 | Bolis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 | 
| 7353655 | Bolis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 | 
| 7353656 | Bolis et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 | 
| 20010039794 | Rocklin et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 | 
| 20010042381 | Dodo et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 | 
| 20020026783 | Utamura | Mar 2002 | A1 | 
| 20020083712 | Tomlinson et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 | 
| 20040025491 | Hoffmann et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 | 
| 20040103667 | Frutschi | Jun 2004 | A1 | 
| 20040105755 | Bolis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 | 
| 20040112037 | Yagi et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 | 
| 20040213675 | Blangetti et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 | 
| 20040221584 | Hoffmann et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 | 
| 20050066664 | Shibata et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 | 
| 20050076646 | Bolis et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 | 
| 20050081529 | Bolis et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 | 
| 20050109033 | Braun et al. | May 2005 | A1 | 
| 20050141991 | Frutschi | Jun 2005 | A1 | 
| 20050279101 | Hoffmann et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 | 
| 20060137356 | Jimenez Haertel et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 | 
| 20060218931 | Haertel et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 | 
| 20070113561 | Bolis et al. | May 2007 | A1 | 
| Number | Date | Country | 
|---|---|---|
| 1 239 888 | May 1967 | DE | 
| 693 06 026 | May 1997 | DE | 
| 198 52 060 | May 2000 | DE | 
| 199 00 026 | Jul 2000 | DE | 
| 199 61 383 | Jun 2001 | DE | 
| 101 15 117 | Oct 2002 | DE | 
| 101 53 911 | May 2003 | DE | 
| 102 07 197 | Sep 2003 | DE | 
| 102 54 721 | Jun 2004 | DE | 
| 0 565 373 | Oct 1993 | EP | 
| 0 789 134 | Jan 1997 | EP | 
| 0 770 771 | May 1997 | EP | 
| 0 781 909 | Jul 1997 | EP | 
| 0 899 438 | Aug 1997 | EP | 
| 0 887 530 | Dec 1998 | EP | 
| 0 889 212 | Jan 1999 | EP | 
| 0 978 635 | Feb 2000 | EP | 
| 0 990 780 | Apr 2000 | EP | 
| 1 108 870 | Jun 2001 | EP | 
| 1 203 866 | May 2002 | EP | 
| 1 205 640 | May 2002 | EP | 
| 1 225 306 | Jul 2002 | EP | 
| 1 422 403 | Nov 2003 | EP | 
| 1563749 | Apr 1969 | FR | 
| 2 280 224 | Jan 1995 | GB | 
| 2 357 552 | Jun 2001 | GB | 
| 2 382 847 | Jun 2003 | GB | 
| 56-43433 | Sep 1981 | JP | 
| 61-37794 | Nov 1986 | JP | 
| 61-283723 | Dec 1986 | JP | 
| 63-248931 | Oct 1988 | JP | 
| 2-211331 | Aug 1990 | JP | 
| 5-195809 | Aug 1993 | JP | 
| 6-10702 | Jan 1994 | JP | 
| 7-97933 | Apr 1995 | JP | 
| 2004-176717 | Jun 2004 | JP | 
| WO 9743530 | Nov 1997 | WO | 
| WO 9848159 | Oct 1998 | WO | 
| WO 9967519 | Dec 1999 | WO | 
| WO 0050739 | Aug 2000 | WO | 
| WO 03038256 | May 2003 | WO | 
| WO 03071113 | Aug 2003 | WO | 
| WO 2004051062 | Jun 2004 | WO | 
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050279101 A1 | Dec 2005 | US | 
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | PCT/EP03/50901 | Nov 2003 | US | 
| Child | 11142328 | US |