The invention relates to a method of controlling the yawing movement of an aircraft running along the ground.
It will be recalled that an aircraft comprises a set of landing gear, which comprises several landing gears, with a view to providing an interface between the aircraft and the ground.
Usually, a pilot controls a yawing movement of an aircraft running along the ground by acting on controls (the pedals of a rudder bar, a control wheel, etc.). In the case of an aircraft that has at least landing gear with a steerable bottom part bearing wheels, the controls act directly, through a controller that is dependent on the speed of the aircraft, on the steerable bottom part.
The thesis entitled “Automatisation du pilotage au sol pour la navigation portuaire [Automation of ground steering for port navigation]”, written by Mr. Jean DUPREZ for Airbus France—LAAS in 2004 (accessible through the on-line thesis website http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/) discloses how to modify the controller in order to provide the pilot with greater assistance in controlling the yawing movement. The thesis thus describes the following method:
on the basis of a command generated by the controls, determining a prepositioning angle through which to steer the wheels of the bottom part of the landing gear;
using closed-loop control which as its input has the prepositioning angle and which generates a correction thereof;
steering the bottom part through a steering angle equal to the prepositioning angle from which the correction has been subtracted.
The object of the invention is to propose a method of controlling a yawing movement of an aircraft running along the ground, in which the steering angle for the bottom part undergoes a different type of closed-loop control.
With a view to achieving this objective, there is proposed a method of controlling a yawing movement of an aircraft running along the ground, the aircraft comprising at least one first landing gear with a steerable bottom part bearing wheels.
According to the invention, the method comprises the steps of:
on the basis of a yaw rate setpoint, determining a wheel-steering prepositioning angle;
using closed-loop control which as its input has the yaw rate setpoint and which generates a command to steer the bottom part in order to steer it through a steering angle equal to the sum of this prepositioning angle and of an angle which is determined taking account of an error between the yaw rate setpoint and the measured yaw rate when the steerable bottom part is steered by the steering angle.
Thus the bottom part is steered by controlling the steering angle about a bottom part prepositioning position.
According to one preferred embodiment of the invention, the method is applied to an aircraft further comprising at least two main landing gears positioned respectively one on the left and one on the right of the fuselage and the wheel's of which are associated with torque application members, the method comprising the step of generating, for the attention of the torque application members of the left and right main landing gears, two acceleration setpoints so that the members thus stimulated generate, on the aircraft, a yaw moment that complements the yaw moment generated by the first landing gear, so that the total yaw moment generated on the aircraft allows the aircraft to comply with the yaw rate setpoint.
The torque application members are, for example, friction brakes and/or self-propelled movement devices, a self-propelled movement device comprising a motor.
The method according to the invention thus makes it possible simultaneously, by distributing the yaw moment, to control both the steering of the bottom part of the first landing gear and a rotational speed differential that is the differential in rotational speeds of the main landing gears. The pilot then no longer has to worry about how the commands are split to act on the steering of the bottom part and on the acceleration of the wheels of the main landing gears.
The invention will be better understood in the light of the following description of one particular nonlimiting embodiment of the invention, with reference to the figures of the attached drawings in which:
With reference to
A pilot wishing to cause the aircraft 1 running along the ground to effect a yawing movement then acts on various controls (such as the pedals of a rudder bar or a control wheel) to generate a yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c.
On the basis of the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c, a computer 4 determines a prepositioning angle θp by which to steer the wheels of the bottom part 3 using a calculation which in this instance is identical to the one explained in the aforementioned thesis.
At the same time, on the basis of the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c, a mono-variable corrector 5 determines a yaw moment setpoint Mza to be generated in the aircraft 1 by the auxiliary landing gear 2 so that the yaw moment Mza generated will allow the aircraft 1 to comply with the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c. Next, a second computer 6 converts the yaw moment setpoint Mza into an angle setpoint θz. A steering angle setpoint θc is then generated for the attention of the control member 200, the steering angle θc being equal to the sum of the prepositioning angle θp and of the angle θz deduced from the yaw moment setpoint Mza. On the basis of the steering setpoint θc, the control member 200 controls the actuators 100 to make these steer the bottom part 3 through the steering angle θc.
According to the invention, at any moment in the yawing movement, the yaw rate {dot over (φ)}m of the aircraft 1 is measured. On the basis of the measured yaw rate {dot over (φ)}m and of the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c, the mono-variable corrector 5 determines the yaw moment setpoint Mza taking account of an error between the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c and the measured yaw rate {dot over (φ)}m when the steerable bottom part is steered through the steering angle θc. Thus, the angle setpoint θz, derived directly from the yaw moment setpoint Mza, is also determined taking account of an error between the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c and the measured yaw rate {dot over (φ)}m.
Thanks to the prepositioning, the yaw rate of the aircraft 1 quickly converges on the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c. Next, by controlling 7 the steering angle θc about the prepositioning angle, the yaw rate of the aircraft 1 is made to comply with the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c, at least under the normal conditions of steering operation of the bottom part.
Here, at any moment in the yawing movement, the steering angle θm is measured. On the basis of the measured steering angle θm, the second computer 6 determines the angle setpoint θz derived directly from the yaw moment setpoint Mza, taking account of an error between the steering angle setpoint θz and the measured steering angle θm. Using control 8 of the steering angle θz, a steering angle that complies with the steering angle setpoint θc is obtained without the first control 7 directly incorporating the error between the steering angle setpoint θc and the measured steering angle θm.
With reference to
To do this, on the basis of the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c, a multi-variables corrector 50 then simultaneously determines the yaw moment setpoint Mza to be generated on the aircraft 1 by the auxiliary landing gear 2 and an additional yaw moment setpoint Mzp to be generated on the aircraft 1 by the torque application members 11,12 so that the overall yaw moment generated by the auxiliary landing gear 2 and by the torque application members 11,12, will allow the aircraft 1 to comply with the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c.
In a way known per se, the torque application members 11,12 are controlled by a control module 13. On the basis of the additional yaw moment setpoint Mzp, the control module 13 generates two acceleration setpoints Γg, Γd for the attention of the torque application members 11,12. Under certain circumstances (wet runway, defective acceleration means, etc.) it may happen that one or more of said members is unable to generate anything more than a limited acceleration, thus preventing the additional yaw moment setpoint Mzp from being achieved. In such an instance, a saturation signal Satg, Satd is sent by the left 9 or right 10 main landing gear concerned to the control module 13 which then takes this saturation into consideration when generating acceleration setpoints Γg, Γd that will allow best convergence toward the required additional yaw moment setpoint Mzp.
According to the invention, on the basis of the yaw rate measurement {dot over (φ)}m and of the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c, the multi-variables corrector 50 simultaneously determines the yaw moment setpoint Mza to be generated by the auxiliary landing gear 2 and the additional yaw moment setpoint Mzp to be generated by the torque application members 11,12 so that the total yaw moment will allow the aircraft 1 to comply with the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c. To do that, the multi-variables corrector 50 takes account of an error between the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c and the measured yaw rate {dot over (φ)}m when the steerable bottom part 3 is steered through the steering angle θc and the torque application members 11,12, are driven in rotation at an acceleration Γg, Γd. Control in acceleration of the torque application members 11,12 is also obtained using the first control 7.
In this instance, a third computer 14 converts the yaw rate setpoint {dot over (φ)}c into a rotational speed differential setpoint Δωc, said setpoint then being forwarded to the multi-variables corrector 50. Furthermore, at any moment in the yawing movement, the mean rotational speeds
Of course, the invention is not restricted to the embodiment described and implementation variations can be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
In particular, the use here of the expression acceleration of the wheels of the main landing gears 9,10, covers both positive acceleration of the wheels and negative acceleration of the wheels, negative acceleration also being known as deceleration.
Although it has been mentioned that the aircraft 1 comprises an auxiliary landing gear at the front 2 and two main landing gears at the rear 9,10, the landing gears could of course be configured in any other way. Further, the aircraft 1 could comprise a quite different number of landing gears and each landing gear could comprise a quite different number of wheels.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 56655 | Aug 2010 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3774340 | Barlow et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
4482961 | Kilner et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4621833 | Soltis | Nov 1986 | A |
5906120 | Thacker et al. | May 1999 | A |
5938239 | Baumann et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
7731302 | Tandy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7798263 | Tandy et al. | Sep 2010 | B2 |
20020180258 | Davison et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20040060765 | Mattson et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20060186267 | Steiner et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20090150010 | Villaume et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Duprez, Jean, “Chapitre 4: Etude d'une loi de pilotage lateral de l'avion au sol,” Automatisation du pilotage au sol pour la navigation portuaire, Mar. 6, 2007, pp. 1-51. |
Duprez, J., et al., “Control of the Aircraft-on-Ground Lateral Motion During Low Speed Roll and Manoeuvers,” Aerospace Conference Proceedings, IEEE, Mar. 6, 2004, pp. 2656-2666, vol. 4. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120046834 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |