Method of creating ultra-fine particles of materials using a high-pressure mill

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6318649
  • Patent Number
    6,318,649
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, October 6, 1999
    25 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 20, 2001
    23 years ago
Abstract
A method for creating ultra-fine particles of material using a high-pressure mill is described. The method includes placing a material in a first chamber and subjecting the material to a high-pressure liquid jet to divide it into particles. These particles are then transferred to a second chamber in which they are subjected to cavitation to further divide the particles into relatively smaller particles. These relatively smaller particles are then transferred to a third chamber, in which the particles collide with a collider to still further divide them into ultra-fine particles of the material. The mill of the present invention includes a first chamber having an high-pressure liquid jet nozzle, first and second slurry nozzles, a second cavitation chamber and a third chamber which houses a collider. Sensors may be located throughout the mill to collect data on the comminution process and to use the data to control the resultant particle size. The product size of the ultra-fine particles made according to the mill of the present invention are preferably less than 15 microns.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to a method for creating ultra-fine particles of a material using high-pressure fluid and a mill for implementing the method. More particularly, the present invention relates to a method and- apparatus for subjecting particles to a high-pressure liquid jet, high turbulence condition, cavitation and collision to comminute the particles.




2. Related Art




Comminution may be defined as either a single or multistage process by which material particles are reduced from random sizes by crushing and grinding to the size required for the intended purpose.




Size reduction in comminution machines relies on three different fragmentation mechanisms: cleavage, shatter, and abrasion. It is commonly stated that only three percent of the energy used in fragmenting solid particles goes into the creation of new surfaces. Thus, current comminution technology is both energy-intensive and inefficient.




During milling of material, to create a fracture in the particles of material, a stress must be induced which exceeds the fracture strength of the material. The mode of fracture and the path that it follows depends on the material, the shape and structure of the particle, and on the way and rate at which the load is applied. The way in which the load is applied will control the stresses that induce fracture extension or growth within the particle. The force used to induce this growth can be one of simple compression, which causes the particle to fracture in tension, whether at a slow or fast rate. Alternatively, the applied load may be in shear, such as is exerted when two particles rub against each other, or the load may be applied as a direct tensile force on the particle.




For optimum comminution of hard materials such as minerals a shattering fracture is most beneficial. This occurs when the energy applied to the particle is well in excess of that required for fracture. Under these conditions, very rapid crack growth is induced and will cause crack bifurcation. Thus, the multiplicity of areas in the particle that are simultaneously overstressed will combine to generate a comparatively large number of particles with a wide spectrum of sizes. Shattering usually occurs under conditions of rapid loading (e.g., a high velocity impact) with maximum size reduction occurring around the impact points. According to existing theory, the finest product sizes are generated in the zone around the impact point, when insufficient energy is applied to cause total fracture of the particle. The localized nature of the applied stress and the high energy required for this ultra-fine grinding make this process relatively inefficient.




Conventional milling machines use mechanical crushing or crushing and attriting to break mineral particles into smaller particles. The low efficiency of existing reduction processes is frequently due to the application of stress where there are no particles. The result is that much of the energy input is wasted in non-productive contact between, for example, crushing mechanisms or between a crushing mechanism and the mill wall, both of which lower the overall energy efficiency of the process.




Further, for brittle materials, there is a considerable difference between the values of uniaxial compressive strength and tensile strength of the material. Thus, the amount of energy which must be consumed in breaking the mineral into small particles under compressive loading is substantially higher than that required if the material can be induced to fail under a tensile stress. To induce simple tensile failure, high pressure liquid jets or different liquid jets have been used in comminution processes.




Size reduction involves rupturing the chemical bonds within the material in order to generate new surfaces. Thus, the chemical processes associated with fracture will significantly affect the energy required to induce this fracture. This influence extends beyond the bonds themselves to include the surrounding environment. For example, the presence of liquid at the crack tip will lower the forces required to expand the crack and improve efficiency, especially where the liquid contains inorganic ions and organic surfactant. One explanation for this effect is that the additives penetrate into microcracks ahead of the major crack front and thus take part in the highly reactive events that occur during fracture. Because the capillary flow of these liquids into the material ahead of the main front runs at the velocity of crack propagation it provides a means of transmitting energy more easily within the crack tip zone. A high-pressure liquid jet containing chemical additives creates extremely dynamic conditions in which microcracks grow ahead of the main failure plane and become pressurized, thereby enhancing any chemical changes which might occur.




For use in liquid-fueled power plants, it is necessary to produce a homogeneous, pumpable suspension of coal that will not settle in delivery lines and which burns at the required rate. Therefore, the coal must be ground from the “standard plant size” to a diameter below 40 microns. Among the many milling methods used for this process the finest product is achieved by the use of autogenous attriting machines. The distinguishing feature of these machines is that size reduction is effected by particles impacting upon each other, after being given the necessary energy to induce fragmentation through a solid or liquid impeller. Included in this class are the following systems: (1) Buhrstones—which cause comminution through an abrasion action; (2) Colloid Mills—in which comminution occurs by collision between particles; (3) Fluid Energy Mills—in which particles interact upon one another; and (4) Sand Grinder—in which particles are reduced by contact with sand particles.




The advantage of the conventional equipment is that the product is reduced to very small sizes (below 40 microns) and distributed within a narrow size range. The equipment, however, can only operate, at any one time, with small quantities of feed, and the initial feed size of particles lies in the range between 0.5 inches and 50 microns, depending on the type of unit. For the sand grinder, for example, the feed stock should already be crushed to below 70 microns. A much greater disadvantage for this type of machine is the very high power consumption required to achieve the required crushing.




The energy required to achieve a given size reduction increases as the product size decreases. This increase is due to many factors and is a consequence not only of the type of mill or the microscopic condition of the material, but also relates to the mechanism of failure at the individual particle level. This is obvious because fragmentation in a chamber is partly brought about by an interaction between the particles and the chamber wall.




In such situations, the treatment of individual particles requires special attention. For example, a coal particle is anisotropic, heterogeneous, and extensively pre-cracked. Physical properties of coal vary as a function of the degree of metamorphism of the coal particle. Because of the organic nature of the material, this means that different properties may be encountered, even within a single particle. Under such a situation an analytical approach to coal fragmentation is very complex.




The efficiency of coal comminution depends on the ability to take advantage of the anisotropy of coal particles which is, in turn, a function of the internal structure. However, with liquid jet comminution, failure occurs on the basis of differential coal porosity and permeability, as these properties control the specific rates of liquid absorption, which directly influence the rate of disintegration.




Experiments conducted with shaped explosive charges to investigate fracture formation in coal showed that there is intense fracturing of coal near the jet path, with this zone of fracture usually bounded by joints, bedding planes and cleat planes. The coal breaks into large and small pieces, usually parallel following natural cleavage planes. Beyond this intensely crushed zone, some large fractures were observed. These crossed joints and traveled long distances, while fractures originating at the base of the jet penetration also crossed bedding planes and extended the zone of influence deeper into the target material.




Comminution technology can also be used to comminute organic materials. One example of such a material is wood. These organic materials are generally softer than the inorganic materials discussed above. In the case of organic materials, the impact of the waterjet causes a shearing force to occur to break apart the material, rather than the crack propagation discussed above.




Conventional comminution technology is both energy intensive and inefficient. Up to 97% of the energy consumed during the operation of conventional size reduction devices can go into non-productive work, with only 3% of the energy input then being used to create new surfaces. Comminution is thus an appropriate target for significant energy savings, since the tonnages of materials involved in the size reduction operations are so great that even small improvements in comminution efficiency would provide considerable savings in energy and mineral resources.




Further, conventional comminution devices are very expensive and wearing process of the friction parts are very significant and costly.




Through study it has been found that a high-pressure liquid jet has an excellent, and in some ways a unique, ability to improve material disruption. Such a capability is due to the following features:




A liquid jet of 10,000 psi pressure moves at approximately 1,332 ft/sec, with a narrowjet diameter providing a concentrated energy flux input to the target.




The high energy density of the liquid jet is concentrated in a very small impact zone, while the intense differential pressure across the jet enhances microcrack generation and growth.




Subsequent to the initial impact, the jet stagnation pressure forces liquid into the cracks and microcracks. It develops a hydromechanical jet action in these cracks and creates an increasingly dense network of cracks in the walls of the cavity created.




Rapid jet penetration into pre-cracked minerals can be enhanced by the use of surface active agents, which will also work to further comminute the coal and retreat any mineral matter in the coal.




In those circumstances where a coal/oil mixture (COM) is required, the liquid jet can be changed to an oil jet, for example, to eliminate the intermediate drying process.




The separation of mineral matter from coal is improved by use of pressurized liquid jets. On occasion, this separation is enhanced by the differential response of the constituent materials to the jet attack which can facilitate separation of the resulting particles on the basis of the size differential in the grain or crystal sizes of these materials.




There is a reduced expectation of mechanical wear or process contamination of the product.




Conventional jet energy mills have a size reduction factor of approximately 50. This means that conventional mills can reduce the size of a particle so that the product size of the final, resultant particles is 50 times smaller than the original feed size of the particles. What is needed is a mill that makes efficient use of high-pressure liquid jets in the comminution of materials into ultra-fine particles.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to a high pressure jet energy mill that is designed to achieve a size reduction factor of approximately 500 and that has relatively lower energy consumption than conventionaljet energy mills. The mill of the present invention includes a first chamber in which a material is subjected to a high-pressure liquid jet attack to achieve comminution of the material. The comminuted particles are then transferred via a primary slurry nozzle to a second chamber, in which the particles undergo cavitation in a cavitation chamber. The particles are then transferred via a secondary slurry nozzle to a third chamber, in which the particles are caused to collide with a stable collider or an ultrasonically vibrating collider to cause further comminution of the particles. The position of this collider, with respect to the secondary slurry nozzle can be adjusted to affect the comminution process. Further, in one embodiment, self-resonating elements can be placed in various chambers in the mill to cause further comminution of the particles. The product size of the resultant particles is preferably less than 15 microns.




In another embodiment of the invention, the mill includes a first chamber in which a material is subjected to a high-pressure liquid jet to achieve comminution of the material. A similar, second chamber is disposed exactly opposite the first chamber. The slurry from each of the first and second chambers is transferred to a third central chamber, located between the first and second chambers, via nozzles, such that the jets from each nozzle undergo a high velocity collision to cause further comminution of the particles.




A mill and data control system can also be used to implement the present invention. In such a system, temperature, pressure and/or sound sensors can be located throughout the mill to measure characteristics of the system during particle processing. This data can be transferred to a processor for storage and/or used for feedback to different portions of the mill to control the comminution process. Other sensors used in the control system include a particle size sensor at the outlet of the mill to measure the size of the resultant particles, and a linear variable differential transducer to measure the position of the collider in the third chamber of the mill.




As such, one object of invention is to comminute a material into an ultrafine particle size in a consistent and energy efficient manner.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES




The foregoing and other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular description of a preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.





FIG. 1

shows a first embodiment of a mill of the present invention for the comminution of materials.





FIG. 2

shows a cross-sectional view of a cavitating nozzle of the mill of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

shows a second embodiment of a mill of the present invention for the comminution of materials.





FIG. 4

shows a mill and data control system of the present invention for the comminution of materials.





FIG. 5

shows an alternate embodiment of a third chamber of the mill of the present invention in which an ultrasonically vibrating horn is used.





FIG. 6

shows an alternate embodiment of the mill of the present invention in which one or/more self-resonating elements are used.





FIG. 6A

shows a detailed view of the self-resonating elements of FIG.


6


.





FIG. 7

shows an exemplary computer system used to implement the mill and data control system of the present invention.





FIG. 8

shows a graph of the product size distribution resulting from use of the mill of the present invention for processing anthracite.





FIG. 9

shows an alternate embodiment of a slurry nozzle of the present invention.





FIG. 10

shows alternate embodiments of slurry nozzles of the present invention.





FIGS. 11A and 11B

show alternate embodiments of a collider of the present invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




A preferred embodiment of the present invention is now described with reference to the figures where like reference numbers indicate identical or functionally similar elements. Also in the figures, the left most digit of each reference number corresponds to the figure in which the reference number is first used. While specific configurations and arrangements are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustrative purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other configurations and arrangements can be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.





FIG. 1

shows a first embodiment of a high-pressure mill


100


for processing materials into ultra-fine particles. Mill


100


includes a first chamber


102


, nozzle chambers


104


and


108


, a second chamber


106


, and a third chamber


110


. In one embodiment, chambers


102


,


106


and


110


each have a length (measured from inlet to outlet) in the range of 1-20 inches and a diameter in the range of 0.25-10 inches. However, it would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that various other sizes and configurations of chambers


102


,


106


and


110


could be used to implement mill


100


of the present invention.




First chamber


102


includes an inlet


112


. The material to be processed is fed into first chamber


102


via inlet


112


. In this embodiment, a funnel


114


is disposed above inlet


112


to facilitate loading of the material to be processed into first chamber


102


. In an alternate embodiment, inlet


112


could be connected via a port to an outlet of another similar mill, so that the particles exiting a first mill could be pumped into a second stage mill to achieve further comminution of the particles. The second stage mill could be designed with the same chambers and features as the first mill, however, the nozzle sizes would be smaller than the first mill to accommodate the reduced size of the particles.




As the material particles are processed, the volume of liquid in the slurry increases, thereby decreasing the comminution effect of the liquid jets. As such, in another embodiment, the slurry exiting mill


100


could be processed in a centrifuge to eliminate the excess liquid and make the slurry more concentrated before it is fed into the second stage mill, as described above.




In one embodiment, the material to be processed is anthracite, commonly known as coal, having a starting size, also referred to as a feed size, of 600-1,200 microns. Although this is a preferable range for the feed size, the feed size could be less than 600 microns and could be as high as 0.5 inches.




It would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that the present mill


100


could be used to process a variety of other materials, both organic and inorganic, having various feed sizes. For example, the mill of the present invention could be used to process any of the following: silica carbides for abrasive use; various silica compounds for high density ceramics; garnet for abrasive and cutting uses; alumina for abrasive and structural ceramic uses; coke and coke by-products; metal powders such as magnetite, zinc, copper, brass and nickel; mica; vermiculite; silicon dioxide; carbon black; and any other brittle material that needs to be finely ground. Further, the mill of the present invention could be used to process a variety of organic materials, including, for example: wood, food products and products for use as pharmaceuticals.




In one embodiment, the material particles are dry as they are fed into first chamber


102


. In another embodiment, the material particles could be fed into first chamber


102


as part of a slurry, e.g., a mixture of material particles and a liquid, such as water or oil.




First chamber


102


further includes a high-pressure liquid jet nozzle


116


. Liquid jet nozzle


116


preferably creates a water jet, however, it would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that other liquids could also be used. The liquid jet generated by nozzle


116


is configured in first chamber


102


such that the jet of liquid exiting from liquid jet nozzle


116


impacts or collides with the material particles after they enter inlet


112


to effect comminution of the material. In the example of processing coal, the nozzle diameter is preferably in a range between 0.005 to 1 inches, and more preferably in the range of 0.005 to 0.060 inches. The nozzle diameter is directly related to the pressure of the liquid stream available through high pressure liquid jet nozzle


116


. As such, the range of nozzle diameters described above is suitable for a pressure range of liquid of 100,000-5,000 psi, respectively. It would be apparent to one skilled in the art that the nozzle diameter could be larger than the above-mentioned range, depending on the size of the pump used to create the available pressure range for the liquid jet. As such, as the amount of pump pressure capable of being achieved increases, the diameter of the nozzle can be increased, in relation thereto, when the volume of the liquid supply is sufficient.




In this embodiment, the nozzle of high-pressure liquid jet nozzle


116


is configured to emit a jet of liquid in the general direction of nozzle chamber


104


. One or more liquid jet nozzles


116


can be disposed in first chamber


102


. If more than one liquid jet nozzle


116


is used, the plurality of liquid jet nozzles can be arranged in a straight line through first chamber


102


, thereby directing each jet of liquid toward nozzle chamber


104


. In one embodiment, the liquid jets from the multiple nozzles are arranged so that the jets are emitted substantially in parallel to each other. In an alternate embodiment, the liquid jets are designed to converge with each other. As the jet(s) of liquid impact the material, the particles are broken into smaller particles, and the slurry, i. e., the combination of the smaller particles and liquid, is forced into nozzle chamber


104


.




Nozzle chamber


104


includes a primary slurry nozzle


118


. Primary slurry nozzle


118


creates a jet of the slurry, and delivers the slurry jet into second chamber


106


. Primary slurry nozzle


118


further creates turbulence in second chamber


106


, which causes the smaller particles of the material to interact with each other and comminute further. In one embodiment, primary slurry nozzle


118


has a diameter in a range of 0.010-1 inch, and preferably within a range of 0.010-0.120 inches. The size of nozzle


118


is directly related to the size of liquid jet nozzle


116


. As such, as the size of liquid jet nozzle


116


increases, so does the resultant size of slurry nozzle


118


.




In one embodiment, nozzle chamber


104


further includes a cavitation nozzle


122


. Cavitation nozzle


122


is shown in further detail in FIG.


2


. As shown in

FIG. 2

, cavitation nozzle


122


has a channel


202


through which high velocity liquid flows. Cavitation nozzle


122


further includes an inner pin


204


. In use, a hydrodynamic shadow is created in front of inner pin


204


that creates a pocket in which the flow is not continuous. Evaporation occurs in this pocket which creates cavitation bubbles in the liquid as it exits cavitation nozzle


122


.




Cavitation nozzle


122


, as shown in

FIG. 1

, is disposed adjacent second chamber


106


. As such, as the slurry is passed through primary slurry nozzle


118


and into second chamber


106


, the cavitation bubbles from the liquid exiting cavitation nozzle


122


implode and generate a local shock wave in second chamber


106


. The shock wave acts on the particles in the slurry and causes them to comminute further. As such, the particle size of the material entering second chamber via an inlet


124


is larger than the particle size as the particles exit second chamber


106


via an outlet


126


.




A secondary slurry nozzle


120


is disposed adjacent outlet


126


of second chamber


106


. Secondary slurry nozzle


120


creates a second jet of slurry as it passes through the nozzle. In one embodiment, the diameter of secondary slurry nozzle


120


is within a range of 0.010-1 inch, and preferably within a range of 0.010-0.120 inches. Again, as discussed above with respect to primary slurry nozzle


118


, the size of secondary slurry nozzle


120


is also related directly to the size of the high-pressure liquid jet nozzle


116


.




Various embodiments of slurry nozzles are shown in

FIGS. 9 and 10

. In particular,

FIG. 9

shows an embodiment of a slurry nozzle


902


that has an inlet


904


and an outlet


906


, where diameter of inlet


904


is larger than the diameter of outlet


906


. Further, an inner surface


910


of slurry nozzle


902


has sharp edges


908


that project slightly out from the inner surface. In this embodiment, sharp edges


908


are formed as rings and are disposed at intervals around inner surface


910


of slurry nozzle


902


. As the particles travel through slurry nozzle


902


, they hit one or more of the sharp edges


908


, which causes further comminution of the particles.





FIG. 10

shows various possible embodiments of channel design for the slurry nozzles used in the present invention. In a first slurry nozzle


1002


, an inlet


1004


has a diameter larger than an outlet


1006


, similar to nozzle


902


of FIG.


9


. In a second design, slurry nozzle


1008


has an inlet


1010


with a diameter which is smaller than the diameter of its outlet


1012


. A third slurry nozzle


1014


has an inlet


1016


and an outlet


1018


of approximately the same diameter, however, the inner surface of nozzle


1014


gradually tapers out from inlet


1016


toward a center point


1020


and then gradually tapers back in from center point


1020


toward outlet


1018


. A fourth slurry nozzle


1022


also has an inlet


1024


and an outlet


1026


of approximately the same diameter. In this embodiment, the inner surface of nozzle


1022


gradually curves inwardly from inlet


1024


toward a center point


1028


, and then gradually curves back outwardly from center point


1028


to outlet


1026


. It would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that various other nozzle designs could also be used to implement the present invention.




The slurry jet emitted from secondary slurry nozzle


120


is directed toward third chamber


110


. A collider


128


is disposed in third chamber


110


directly in the path of the slurry jet. Collider


128


can be a stable collider, such as the screw mechanism shown in FIG.


1


. Alternatively, collider


128


could be an ultrasonically vibrating collider


502


, as shown in FIG.


5


. Ultrasonically vibrating collider


502


can be configured to have a vibration within a range of up to 20,000 Hz or higher. In one embodiment, ultrasonic vibrating collider


502


is the XL2020 Generator, available from Misonix Incorporated, Farmingdale, N.Y. In either embodiment, the position of collider


128


within third chamber


110


is preferably adjustable so that the collider can function to restrict the flow out of secondary slurry nozzle


120


and into third chamber


110


. This flow restriction causes increased turbulence to occur in second chamber


106


, which further aids in the comminution of the particles.




Two embodiments of colliders are shown in

FIGS. 11A and 11B

. In the embodiment of

FIG. 11A

, collider


1102


has a front surface


1104


which is the surface that the slurry impacts. In this first embodiment, front surface


1104


is flat. In this embodiment, the slurry exits nozzle


120


and collides with flat front surface


1104


. In a second embodiment shown in

FIG. 11B

, collider


1106


has a front surface


1108


that is concave in the shape of an inverted cone. In this embodiment, as the slurry exits nozzle


120


and collides with front surface


1108


, the concave shape causes the particles to bounce off and collide with each other and/or collide with other areas of front surface


1108


to thereby cause further comminution of the particles. It would be apparent to one skilled in the art that the front surface


1108


could be formed in a variety of concave-like shapes to cause the same effect. For example, a hole could be formed in front surface


1108


to cause the particles to further comminute.




In either embodiment, the slurry jet from secondary slurry nozzle


120


directly collides with collider


128


to effect additional comminution of the particles of material in the slurry. As discussed above, the position of collider


128


is preferably positionable at various distances away from secondary slurry nozzle


120


. This distance, D, is shown in FIG.


5


and marked with reference number


504


. As collider


128


is moved closer to the flow of slurry exiting from slurry nozzle


120


, i.e., as D decreases, the flow becomes more restricted. This restricted flow causes turbulence in second chamber


106


, which assists with comminution of the particles in that chamber.




Although mill


100


is described with respect to

FIG. 1

as an example, mill


100


could be used to achieve the desired particle size without the use of cavitation nozzle


122


. In particular, cavitation can be induced in second chamber


106


by creating a pressure differential between the pressure in primary nozzle


118


and the pressure in second chamber


106


of approximately 100:1. Depending on the distance D between collider


128


and secondary slurry nozzle


120


, the flow restriction may cause such a pressure differential, which will in turn cause cavitation to be induced in second chamber


106


.




Third chamber


110


further has an outlet port


130


disposed at the bottom of the chamber. After the collision between the slurry and collider


128


, the slurry flows to the bottom of third chamber


110


and exits via outlet port


130


. The mill


100


of the present invention is designed to achieve ultra-fine particles having a resultant size, also referred to as a product size, of less than 15 microns. Preferably, the ultra-fine particles have a product size within a range of 1-5 microns. Still more preferably, the product size of the ultra-fine particles resulting from the use of mill


100


is below 1 micron.




In an alternate embodiment, comminution of the material can be achieved using different combinations of the nozzles and chambers discussed above. For example, in one embodiment, comminution can be achieved using only first chamber


102


, primary slurry nozzle


118


and third chamber


110


. In an alternate embodiment, comminution can be achieved using only first chamber


102


, secondary slurry nozzle


120


and third chamber


110


. In another embodiment, multiple nozzles can be used in lieu of primary slurry nozzle


118


. The use of multiple nozzles in any portion of mill


100


will help to increase production, i.e., throughput, of mill


100


, and will also create more turbulence in the chambers of the mill thereby further increasing the size reduction factor, i.e., the ratio of the feed size of the particles to the product size of the resultant particles, of the mill.




In a further embodiment, a self-resonating device


602


, as shown in

FIG. 6

, can be placed throughout mill


100


. In the embodiment shown in

FIG. 6

, beams


604


and


606


of self-resonating device


602


, shown in

FIG. 6A

, are disposed at a certain distance apart from one another and configured to have a self-resonating frequency, such that the amplitude of the movement of beams


604


and


606


will contribute to the comminution process. It would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that two or more such beams could be positioned around a center line to create self-resonating device


602


.




In the example shown in

FIG. 6

, self-resonating devices


602


are disposed in first chamber


102


and in front of primary slurry nozzle


118


, However, it would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that these devices could be placed in a variety of locations in mill


100


to aid in comminution.




In one embodiment, mill


100


may be fitted with sensors to monitor the comminution process, as will be discussed in further detail below with respect to FIG.


4


. For example, temperature sensors


132


, pressure sensors


134


, and sound sensors


136


may be disposed in various areas of each chamber of mill


100


. By way of example, these sensors are shown placed in various positions within mill


100


in FIG.


1


. For example, temperature sensors


132


are shown disposed in front of nozzle


116


, in front of primary slurry nozzle


118


, in second chamber


106


, and in third chamber


110


. Similarly, pressure sensors


134


are disposed in front of nozzle


116


, in front of primary slurry nozzle


118


and in second chamber


106


, and sound sensors


136


are disposed adjacent the inlet


124


and outlet


126


of second chamber


106


.




Temperature and pressure can be measured merely to collect data to keep track of the temperature ranges that occur during the comminution process and to ensure that the pressure created by the various nozzles is sufficient to result in the ultra-fine particles. The sound is measured in second chamber


106


to obtain a reading of how intense the comminution process is in the cavitation chamber. In particular, the frequency of the sound that occurs in this chamber is measured. Typically, the frequency emitted depends on the conditions when cavitation is induced. Frequencies are generally within the range of 500-1000 KHz. In an alternate embodiment, mill


100


can be used in a production line to comminute the material in mass volume. In such a case, the data from the sensors can be fed back to a computer-controlled mill to control the comminution process. An embodiment of this data control system for the mill of the present invention will be discussed in further detail with respect to FIG.


4


.




A second embodiment of a mill


300


is shown in FIG.


3


. Mill


300


has a first chamber


302


and a second chamber


304


disposed on opposite ends of a third chamber


306


. First chamber


302


, similar to first chamber


102


, has an inlet


308


, a funnel


310


, and a high-pressure liquid jet nozzle


312


. As described previously in

FIG. 1

as the particles of the material travel down funnel


310


and enter first chamber


302


via inlet


308


, the liquid jet from nozzle


312


collides or impacts with the particles, thereby breaking them apart. The liquid jet nozzle


312


is oriented in first chamber


302


such that the slurry passes through first chamber


302


and into a nozzle chamber


320


.




Nozzle chamber


320


contains a first slurry nozzle


324


. First slurry nozzle


324


creates a liquid jet of the slurry created in first chamber


302


. Similarly, second chamber


304


includes an inlet


314


, a funnel


316


, and a liquid jet nozzle


318


. The same process occurs in second chamber


304


in which the particles travel down funnel


316


through inlet


314


and are impacted by a jet of liquid from nozzle


318


. The slurry from second chamber


304


passes through to a nozzle chamber


322


. Nozzle chamber


322


includes a second slurry nozzle


326


, which creates a jet from the slurry produced in second chamber


304


. The jets from first and second slurry nozzles


324


and


326


are disposed such that they collide with each other in a high velocity collision within third chamber


306


. This collision causes further comminution of the particles. The slurry then falls to the bottom of third chamber


306


and exit via an outlet


328


. Temperature, pressure and sound sensors, similar to those discussed with respect to mill


100


in

FIG. 1

, can also be used in mill


300


to acquire data and control the comminution process.





FIG. 4

shows a mill and data control system


400


of the present invention. The mill of system


400


is similar to mill


100


in that it includes a first chamber


102


in which particles are impacted by a high-pressure liquid jet generated by nozzle


116


, a nozzle chamber


104


, a second chamber


106


in which cavitation occurs, a second nozzle chamber


108


, and a third chamber


110


in which the particles impact a collider for further comminution.




In the mill of

FIG. 4

, temperature sensor


132


, pressure sensor


134


and sound sensor


136


are shown disposed in second chamber


106


. In one embodiment, sensors


132


,


134


and


136


are implemented using various transducers, thermocouples and user input, as would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art.




Data collected by each of these sensors are fed into a signal conditioning module


402


. In one embodiment, signal conditioning module


402


is a signal conditioner/isolator available from Omega Engineering, Stamford, Connecticut. Signal conditioning module


402


converts the signals transmitted from the sensors


132


,


134


and


136


into a computer-readable format and passes them to data acquisition (DAQ) card


404


. In one embodiment, DAQ card


404


is a data acquisition card available from National Instruments Corporation, Austin, Texas. The DAQ card


404


can be inserted or disposed in a PCMCIA slot


406


of a processor


408


. Processor


408


processes the signals to acquire data regarding the comminution process. In one embodiment, processor


408


is running LabView software that enables the user to view, store and/or manipulate the data received from the sensors to be used as control parameters in the control system.




It would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art that the present invention may be implemented using hardware, software or a combination thereof and may be implemented in a computer system or other processing system. In fact, in one embodiment, the invention is directed toward one or more computer systems capable of carrying out the functionality described herein. An example of a computer system


700


is shown in FIG.


7


. The computer system


700


includes one or more processors, such as processor


408


. Processor


408


is connected to a communication infrastructure


706


(e.g., a communications bus, cross-over bar, or network). Various software embodiments are described in terms of this exemplary computer system. After reading this description, it will become apparent to a person skilled in the relevant art how to implement the invention using other computer systems and/or computer architectures.




Computer system


700


can include a display interface


702


that forwards graphics, text, and other data from the communication infrastructure


706


(or from a frame buffer not shown) for display on the display unit


730


.




Computer system


700


also includes a main memory


708


, preferably random access memory (RAM), and may also include a secondary memory


710


. The secondary memory


710


may include, for example, a hard disk drive


712


and/or a removable storage drive


714


, representing a floppy disk drive, a magnetic tape drive, an optical disk drive, etc. The removable storage drive


714


reads from and/or writes to a removable storage unit


718


in a well-known manner. Removable storage unit


718


, represents a floppy disk, magnetic tape, optical disk, etc. which is read by and written to by removable storage drive


714


. As will be appreciated, the removable storage unit


718


includes a computer usable storage medium having stored therein computer software and/or data.




In alternative embodiments, secondary memory


710


may include other similar means for allowing computer programs or other instructions to be loaded into computer system


700


. Such means may include, for example, a removable storage unit


722


and an interface


720


. Examples of such may include a program cartridge and cartridge interface (such as that found in video game devices), a removable memory chip (such as an EPROM, or PROM) and associated socket, and other removable storage units


722


and interfaces


720


which allow software and data to be transferred from the removable storage unit


722


to computer system


700


.




Computer system


700


may also include a communications interface


724


. Communications interface


724


allows software and data to be transferred between computer system


700


and external devices. Examples of communications interface


724


may include a modem, a network interface (such as an Ethernet card), a communications port, a PCMCIA slot and card, etc. Software and data transferred via communications interface


724


are in the form of signals


728


which may be electronic, electromagnetic, optical or other signals capable of being received by communications interface


724


. These signals


728


are provided to communications interface


724


via a communications path (i.e., channel)


726


. This channel


726


carries signals


728


and may be implemented using wire or cable, fiber optics, a phone line, a cellular phone link, an RF link and other communications channels.




In this document, the terms “computer program medium” and “computer usable medium” are used to generally refer to media such as removable storage drive


714


, a hard disk installed in hard disk drive


712


, and signals


728


. These computerprogram products are means for providing software to computer system


700


. The invention is directed to such computer program products.




Computer programs (also called computer control logic) are stored in main memory


708


and/or secondary memory


710


. Computer programs may also be received via communications interface


724


. Such computer programs, when executed, enable the computer system


700


to perform the features of the present invention as discussed herein. In particular, the computer programs, when executed, enable the processor


704


to perform the features of the present invention. Accordingly, such computer programs represent controllers of the computer system


700


.




In an embodiment where the invention is implemented using software, the software may be stored in a computer program product and loaded into computer system


700


using removable storage drive


714


, hard drive


712


or communications interface


724


. The control logic (software), when executed by the processor


704


, causes the processor


704


to perform the functions of the invention as described herein.




In another embodiment, the invention is implemented primarily in hardware using, for example, hardware components such as application specific integrated circuits (ASICs). Implementation of the hardware state machine so as to perform the functions described herein will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art(s). In yet another embodiment, the invention is implemented using a combination of both hardware and software.




As shown in

FIG. 4

, a second temperature sensor


132


and pressure sensor


134


are disposed on liquid jet


116


to measure the temperature and pressure of the liquid as it exits liquid jet


116


and enters first chamber


102


. The data from these sensors is also fed into signal conditioning module


402


and processor


408


.




A linear variable differential transducer (LVDT)


410


is disposed on one end of collider


128


of third chamber


128


. LVDT


410


measures the linear position of collider


128


with respect to the slurry flow as it enters third chamber


110


. The data from LVDT


410


are also fed into signal conditioning module


402


and processor


408


.




Finally, a particle size sensor


412


is disposed in outlet port


130


of third chamber


110


to measure the final size of the particles after mill processing is complete. The data from particle size sensor


412


are also fed into signal conditioning module


402


and processor


408


.




Although system


400


of

FIG. 4

is shown as only a data acquisition system, it would be apparent to one skilled in the relevant art, that processor


408


could use the data acquired to control mill processing of the mineral particles. In such an embodiment, a feedback loop would be created between processor


408


and each of the chambers


102


,


104


,


106


,


108


and


110


to control the flow and comminution at each stage of the processing.




For example, the user could select the final particle size to be achieved via computer interface, and the data acquired by processor


408


could be used to vary the pressure of the liquid streams through the nozzles and/or to adjust the position of the flow restrictor with respect to the secondary slurry nozzle. In this way, the data acquired can be used to control and accurately maintain the desired product size of the materials being processed.




EXAMPLE





FIG. 8

shows a graph of particle size distribution resulting from use of the mill of the present invention for processing anthracite. In this example, the distribution marked as


802


is based on a feed size of 0.25-0.5 inches. For the distribution marked as


804


, the feed size was 0.02-0.05 inches. The test mill included first chamber


102


, nozzle chamber


104


, second chamber


106


and third chamber


110


, as described above with respect to mill


100


. The nozzle for high pressure liquid jet


116


had a diameter of 0.012 inches and the primary slurry nozzle of nozzle chamber


104


was 0.045 inches. The liquid pressure for jet


116


used for the particles shown in distribution


802


was 40,000 psi, and the liquid pressure for jet


116


used for the particles shown in distribution


804


was 30,000 psi. Collider


128


in third chamber


110


was in a fully open position.




As shown in the graphs of

FIG. 8

, for a feed size of 0.25-0.5 inches, the mill of the present invention comminuted approximately 90% of these starting particles to a product size within a range of submicron to 15 microns. For a feed size of 0.02-0.05 inches, the mill of the present invention comminuted approximately 90% of these particles to a product size within a range of submicron to 28 microns.




The mill of the present invention is intended to be used for the comminution of both organic and inorganic materials, including comminution of minerals. In the comminution of certain minerals, such as mica, the resulting particles achieved using the mill of the present invention are in the shape of flakes of minerals. In particular, the mill of the present invention creates flakes or platelets of ultra-fine particles of minerals. The liquid jets cause the liquid to enter the tip of cracks in the minerals, which create tension at the tip. This tension causes the cracks to propagate along the natural plane in the mineral so that small particles of the minerals separate into flakes. As such, the present invention provides a unique shape to these particles, viz, the natural smallest particle of the mineral available. Particles generated using other methods which do not incorporate the comminution techniques of the present invention do not result in flakes because they do not take advantage of the natural cracks in the minerals.




The ultra-fine anthracite particles resulting from processing using the mill of the present invention can be utilized in a variety of applications. For example, the resulting anthracite particles can be used in the following applications: electrodes of metallurgical furnaces; graphite and graphite-based products; carbon black; carbon-based hydrogen storage systems; molds and dies for casting; water trays for chemical vapor deposition processing; electrodes for plasma etching; brushes for electric motors; fuel cells plates, catalysts and electrodes; electrodes for EDM; aerospace and naval structural components; meso-phase carbons for lithium-ion batteries; carbon fibers, whiskers, filaments, tapes and composite materials; molecular sieving carbons; carbon fiber reinforced plastics; activated carbons; activated carbon fibers; fullerenes and carbon nanotubes; diamond-like films; organic chemicals including ethylene, propylene, butadiene, benzene, toluene, xylene and methanol; and engineering polymers and engineering plastics including general engineering plastics such as PET, PBT, PAR, high-temperature heat-resistant plastics, liquid crystalline polymers, functional polymers, condensed polynuclear aromatic resins and inorganic/organic polymers.




While a number of embodiments of the present invention have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example, and not limitation. It will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art that various changes in form and detail can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus the present invention should not be limited by any of the above-described exemplary embodiments, but should be defined only in accordance with the following claims and their equivalents.



Claims
  • 1. A method for creating ultra-fine particles of a material using high-pressure liquid jet, comprising:(a) placing a material in a first chamber; (b) subjecting the material in the first chamber to a high-pressure liquid jet, whereby at least a portion of the material is divided into particles; (c) transferring the particles of the material to a second chamber in a continuous high-pressure slurry jet; (d) subjecting the particles of the material to cavitation in the second chamber, whereby at least a portion of the particles are further divided into relatively smaller particles; (e) transferring the relatively smaller particles to a third chamber in a continuous high-pressure slurry jet; and (f) causing the relatively smaller particles to collide with a collider in said third chamber, whereby at least a portion of said relatively smaller particles are divided into ultra-fine particles of the material.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein said placing step includes providing a plurality of particles of the material wherein said particles have a feed size of less than 0.5 inches in diameter.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein said placing step includes providing a plurality of particles of the material, wherein said particles have a feed size within a range of 600-1,200 microns in diameter.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein said causing step includes creating ultra-fine particles of the material having a product size of less than 15 microns.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein said causing step includes creating ultra-fine particles of the material having a product size of less than 5 microns.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein said step (b) includes generating the high-pressure liquid jet using a high-pressure liquid jet nozzle having a diameter within a range of 0.005-1.0 inches.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein said step (b) further includes delivering said high-pressure liquid jet at a pressure within a range of 5,000-100,000 psi.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said step (b) includes generating the high-pressure liquid jet using a high-pressure liquid jet nozzle having a diameter within a range of 0.005-0.060 inches.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said causing step includes causing the relatively smaller particles to collide with a flow restrictor.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein said causing step includes causing the relatively smaller particles to collide with a flat front surface of the collider.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein said causing step includes causing the relatively smaller particles to collide with a concave front surface of the collider.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein said causing step includes causing the relatively smaller particles to collide with an ultrasonically vibrating tip of the collider.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said step (c) includes providing a primary slurry nozzle to transfer the particles of the material to the second chamber.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said step (d) includes attacking the particles exiting said primary slurry nozzle using a cavitation nozzle.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein said step (e) includes providing a secondary slurry nozzle to transfer the relatively smaller particles of the material to the third chamber.
  • 16. The method of claim 15, wherein said step (e) further includes directing the relatively smaller particles of the material at the collider in the third chamber.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein said placing step includes providing a material selected from the group consisting of: solid phase organic and inorganic materials.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein said placing step includes providing a mineral selected from the group consisting of: anthracite, silica carbides, silica compounds, garnet, alumina, coke, coke by-products, magnetite, zinc, copper, brass, nickel, mica, vermiculite, silicon dioxide, and carbon black.
  • 19. A method for creating ultra-fine particles of a material using a high-pressure liquid jet, comprising:(a) placing a first material in a first chamber; (b) subjecting the first material in the first chamber to a high-pressure liquid jet, whereby at least a portion of the first material is divided into particles; (c) placing a second material in a second chamber; (d) subjecting the second material in the second chamber to a high-pressure liquid jet, whereby at least a portion of the second material is divided into particles; (e) creating a first jet of slurry of said particles from said first chamber and creating a second jet of slurry of said particles from said second chamber, such that said first and second slurry jets impact each other in a third chamber, whereby at least a portion of said particles are divided into ultra-fine particles of the material.
US Referenced Citations (35)
Number Name Date Kind
2991946 Croft Jul 1961
3058673 Firing Oct 1962
3595486 Stephanoff Jul 1971
3608835 Ruzicka Sep 1971
3837583 Kugelberg et al. Sep 1974
3973733 Switzer Aug 1976
4119160 Summers et al. Oct 1978
4146366 Keller Mar 1979
4186772 Handlman Feb 1980
4323198 Turner et al. Apr 1982
4337899 Selberg Jul 1982
4546925 Spiro Oct 1985
4619406 Fishgal Oct 1986
4723715 Mazurkiewicz Feb 1988
4871117 Baueregger et al. Oct 1989
4930707 Oshiro et al. Jun 1990
4986479 Swarden et al. Jan 1991
5012984 Ishikawa et al. May 1991
5035362 Mazurkiewicz Jul 1991
5086974 Henshaw Feb 1992
5086982 Hirano et al. Feb 1992
5199512 Curlett Apr 1993
5217163 Henshaw Jun 1993
5291957 Curlett Mar 1994
5358183 Kanda et al. Oct 1994
5542613 Nied Aug 1996
5562253 Henderson et al. Oct 1996
5660335 Köppl et al. Aug 1997
5716751 Bertrand et al. Feb 1998
5732893 Nied Mar 1998
5765766 Yoshida et al. Jun 1998
5765924 Liesveld Jun 1998
5799881 Urata et al. Sep 1998
5855326 Beliavsky Jan 1999
5931771 Kozyuk Aug 1999
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
1052782 Mar 1959 DE
806771 Dec 1936 FR
10137618 May 1998 JP
WO 9730790 Aug 1997 WO
WO 0009267 Feb 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Summers, D.A. and Mazurkiewicz, M. The Effect of Jet Traverse Velocity on the Cutting of Coal and Jet Structure, May, 1976, Third International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, pp. D5-51-D5-64.
Summers, David A. et al., Experimentation in Hydraulic Coal Mining, Mar., 1997, AIME Annual Meeting, Society of Mining Eingeneers of AIME, pp. 1-20.
Mazurkiewicz, M. and Summers, D.A., The Enhancement of Cavitation Damage and its Use in Rock Disintegration, Apr., 1982, Sixth International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, pp. 27-38.
Mazurkiewicz, M., The Separation of Wood Fibers by a High Pressure Water Jet, Jun., 1984, Seventh International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, pp. 389-394.
Mazurkiewicz, M. and Summers, D.A., The Use of High Pressure Water Jets as a High Efficiency Tool for Coal Comminution, Mar., 1985, Rock Mechanics and Explosives Research Center at the University of Missouri—Rolla, pp. 717-729.
Galecki, G., and Mazurkiewicz, M., Direct Injection of Coal into Cavitation Cell for Purpose of Comminution, Oct., 1988, Ninth International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, pp. 411-422.
Mazurkiewicz, M. and Galecki, G., Coal and Minerals Comminution with High Pressure Waterjet Assistance, May, 1993, XVIII International Mineral Processing Congress, pp. 131-138.
Wright, D. et al., A Study of Rotary Jets for Material Removal, Aug., 1997, Ninth Annual American Waterjet Conference, pp. 525-539.
Mei, Fang et al., “A New Type of High Pressure Water Jet Mill,”, Proceedings of the 10th American Waterjet Conference, vol. I, Aug. 14-17, 1999, Houston, TX, pp. 431.440.
Mei, Fang et al., “Mica Particle Size Dimension Distribution After Water Jet Comminuting,”, Proceedings of the 10th American Waterjet Conference, vol. I, Aug. 14-17, 1999, Houston, TX, pp. 441-450.
Hov et al., Theoretical Analysis of a Jet-Driven Helmholtz Resonator and Effect of its Configuration on the Waterjet Cutting Property., Oct. 4-6, 1988, 9th International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology, pp. 189-201.
Zhonghou et al., Theory of Vortex and Design of Self-Resonating Jet Nozzles, Nov. 30-Dec. 2, 1992, The Third Pacific Rim International Conference on Water Jet Technology, pp. 255-263.