Method of designing and fabricating patient-specific restorations from intra-oral scanning of a digital impression coping

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11816835
  • Patent Number
    11,816,835
  • Date Filed
    Monday, June 21, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 14, 2023
    6 months ago
Abstract
Taking a digital implant or abutment level digital impression by means of intra-oral, computed tomography or other imaging method provides the restorative doctor and laboratory accurate and effective data for determining the implant position, angulation and locking feature orientation without a physical impression. Such data is correlated with a digital library to produce an output which enables design and fabrication of an accurate restorative device such as a prosthetic tooth or crown. In this way the time-consuming, costly and error prone mechanical replication of the relevant dental anatomy is obviated.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to the design and manufacture of patient-specific dental restorations. More specifically, the invention herein relates to restorations such as implant abutments, screw-retained crowns, implant and abutment over-denture and temporary prostheses at the implant and abutment level.


BACKGROUND DISCUSSION

Dental implants have become the preferred modern alternative for replacing missing natural teeth. Typically, an implant abutment is secured into the underlying bone tissue terminating within the surrounding gum tissue. Eventually, a dental restoration is secured to the implant. The restoration must be designed to match the surrounding teeth in color, size, shape and orientation so that it looks and functions much as the predecessor natural tooth it replaces. However, because of potential variability in the precise position (angulation and vertical position) and locking orientation of the implant, the design of the restoration is also subject to substantial variability.


Conventionally, the restoration is designed by a laboratory using a physical replication of the dental anatomy. This physical replication is obtained by affixing an impression coping, locked to the underlying implant or abutment and extending above the gum line among the surrounding dental structure. Then the area is replicated using dental laboratory techniques and a model is produced. The laboratory then uses this model to design and fabricate the prosthetic restoration. Unfortunately, these various steps are time consuming, costly and potentially error prone.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention overcomes the noted deficiencies and disadvantages of the prior art laboratory process. The invention herein entirely obviates the need for a physical replication to be sent to a laboratory to provide information for the design and fabrication of an implant restoration. The invention comprises the following steps:


1. A digital impression coping is affixed to the implant or abutment (for an abutment level digital impression) by means of a screw or it is friction retained. Digital impression copings for computed tomography and related imaging methods are made from radiopaque materials.


2. The digital impression coping(s) and surrounding dental anatomy are then imaged via intra-oral, computed tomography or other imaging technology including magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).


3. The scan of the digital impression coping(s) is correlated with reference impression digital impression coping(s) to determine the implant(s) position, angulation and locking feature orientation.


4. A laboratory then utilizes a CAD program that uses the implant(s) or abutment(s) spatial relation to the patient's oral anatomy to design patient-specific prosthetic restoration(s) and create the output file(s) required for its manufacture.


Taking a digital implant or abutment level digital impression by means of intra-oral, computed tomography or other imaging method provides the restorative doctor and laboratory an accurate and effective means of determining the implant position, angulation and locking feature orientation without a physical impression. This digital impression has applications including, but not limited to:


1. Designing and fabricating patient-specific restorations such as implant abutments, screw-retained crowns, implant and abutment level over-denture restorations and temporary prostheses at the implant and abutment level.


2. As a record of a patient's implant and anatomical spatial data on a specific date.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The aforementioned objects and advantages of the present invention, as well as additional objects and advantages thereof, will be more fully understood hereinafter as a result of a detailed description of a preferred embodiment when taken in conjunction with the following drawings in which:



FIG. 1 is a photograph of a patient's oral anatomy adjacent an implant to which a digital impression coping has been affixed and locked into engagement;



FIG. 2 is a photograph of an intra-oral scanning process of the patient's implant area of FIG. 1;



FIGS. 3A and 3B are images obtained by the scanning process of FIG. 2 showing the precise vertical position, angular orientation and locking engagement of the digital impression coping and adjacent dental anatomy;



FIG. 4 is an image similar to that of FIGS. 3A and 3B, but showing the oral anatomy with a restoration in place of the digital impression coping and positioned in engagement with the underlying implant ready to receive a prosthetic tooth or crown based upon data derived from the originally scanned image; and



FIG. 5 is an image of the relevant anatomy showing placement of a prosthetic implant abutment, designed and fabricated by employing the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

This method of digital implant and abutment level impression taking is similar to conventional methods, but the implant position, angulation and locking feature orientation are captured via intra-oral, computed tomography or other imaging methods instead of with physical impression media. The basic components required to capture an implant or abutment level digital impression and design a restoration from the digital impression are:


1. A digital impression coping of known dimension, for implant or abutment level, with a flat, radius, slot or other geometrically distinct feature, or features, for determining the implant position, angulation and locking feature orientation.


2. An intra-oral, computed tomography or other imaging method that can record the digital impression coping(s) and oral anatomy with sufficient accuracy.


3. A means of correlating the scan of the digital impression coping with a reference digital impression coping thereby deriving the implant(s) position, angulation and locking feature orientation.


4. CAD software to design the implant or abutment level restorations and create an output file(s) for additive or subtractive manufacture of the implant or abutment level prosthetic restoration.


The paragraph 1 component is shown in FIG. 1. As seen therein, a digital impression coping 22 has been affixed to the underlying implant in the oral cavity 20 in an area 24. The abutment is in locking engagement with the implant so that its position and orientation (note the flat area 23 at the upper end of the abutment) will provide precise data in regard to the underlying implant. This data becomes evident in a scan of the area being taken as shown in FIG. 2. A number of available intra-oral scanners 26 are available for performing this step. One such scanner, for example, is an IOS FastScan™ Digital Impression System shown in FIG. 2. The resultant images 30, 32 and 34 are shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B. These images represent the type of data that can be electronically transmitted to a laboratory for the area 24a.


Laboratory personnel maintain a digital library of impression copings that can be correlated to the scan data of the digital impression coping in the patient's mouth. Based upon the digital impression coping length and the location of the “orientating feature” on the upper end of the digital impression coping, three additional types of information can be obtained, namely:


1. The angulation as determined by the angle of the digital impression coping 22a;


2. The position of the implant restorative connection (i.e., its position with respect to the implant-level, or the abutment level and other important fixed points such as adjacent and opposing contacts); and


3. The locking feature orientation (i.e., where the orientating feature on the digital impression coping matches with a corresponding feature 23 on the implant connection).


The laboratory personnel can then employ these data, derived both from the image and from their library, to utilize CAD software to create an output file 36 (see FIG. 4) of the prosthetic restoration 38 from which the physical restoration 40 is then fabricated and sent to the dentist or implant surgeon who mates it with the implant 25 (see FIG. 5).


Having thus disclosed a preferred embodiment of the invention, it will now be apparent that variation from the described example, is contemplated. By way of example, the image may be derived in ways not specifically described herein and the digital impression coping may be configured with various alternative characteristics which alter the data from that specifically disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention herein is not necessarily limited to the specific embodiment depicted, but only by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.

Claims
  • 1. A method for designing and fabricating a dental prosthetic restoration for mating with a dental implant installed in a patient without requiring a physical impression of the patient's oral cavity, the method comprising the steps of: a) mating a digital impression coping with said dental implant, said digital impression coping including at least one geometrically distinct feature for determining the position and angulation of the dental implant;b) scanning an image of said digital impression coping and adjacent dental anatomy;c) removing said digital impression coping from said dental implant;d) using said scanned image and CAD software to design a restoration to mate directly with said dental implant including the step of correlating said scanned image to a library of digital impression coping data;e) creating an output file for additive manufacturing of the restoration; andf) additively manufacturing the restoration.
  • 2. The method recited in claim 1 wherein the library of digital impression coping data is representative of a plurality of digital impression copings corresponding to dental implants of a plurality of different manufacturers.
  • 3. The method recited in claim 1 wherein step b) comprises the step of producing an oral cavity image which includes at least adjacent and opposing teeth of said patient in relation to said dental implant.
  • 4. The method recited in claim 1 wherein step b) comprises using an intra-oral imaging method to scan said image.
  • 5. The method recited in claim 1 wherein step b) comprises using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to scan said image.
  • 6. The method recited in claim 1, further comprising the step of installing the restoration onto the dental implant in place of the digital impression coping.
  • 7. A method of designing a dental prosthetic restoration for mating with a dental implant installed in a patient without requiring a physical impression of the patient's oral cavity, the method comprising the steps of: a) affixing a digital impression coping to said dental implant, said digital impression coping including at least one geometrically distinct feature for determining the position and angulation of the dental implant;b) scanning said digital impression coping;c) removing said digital impression coping from said dental implant;d) correlating said scanning of said digital impression coping to a library of digital impression coping data;e) using CAD software to design a restoration to mate directly with said dental implant;f) creating an output file for additive manufacturing of the restoration; andg) additively manufacturing the restoration.
  • 8. The method recited in claim 7 wherein the library of digital impression coping data is representative of a plurality of digital impression copings corresponding to dental implants of a plurality of different manufacturers.
  • 9. The method recited in claim 7 wherein step b) comprises the step of producing an oral cavity image which includes at least adjacent and opposing teeth of said patient in relation to said dental implant.
  • 10. The method recited in claim 7 wherein step b) comprises using an intra-oral imaging method to scan said digital impression coping.
  • 11. The method recited in claim 7 wherein step b) comprises using magnetic resonance imaging (MM) method to scan said digital impression coping.
  • 12. The method recited in claim 7, further comprising the step of installing the restoration onto the dental implant in place of the digital impression coping.
  • 13. A method of designing and fabricating a dental prosthetic restoration for mating with an implant abutment attached to an implant installed in a patient without requiring a physical impression of the patient's oral cavity, the method comprising the steps of: a) mating a digital impression coping with said abutment, said digital impression coping including at least one geometrically distinct feature for determining the position and angulation of the abutment;b) scanning an image of said digital impression coping and adjacent dental anatomy;c) removing said digital impression coping from said abutment;d) using said scanned image and CAD software to design a restoration to mate directly with said abutment including the step of correlating said scanned image to a library of digital impression coping data;e) creating an output file for additive manufacturing of the restoration; andf) additively manufacturing the restoration.
  • 14. The method recited in claim 13 wherein the library of digital impression coping data is representative of a plurality of digital impression copings corresponding to implant abutments of a plurality of different manufacturers.
  • 15. The method recited in claim 13 wherein step b) comprises the step of producing an oral cavity image which includes at least adjacent and opposing teeth of said patient in relation to said implant abutment.
  • 16. The method recited in claim 13 wherein step b) comprises using an intra-oral imaging method to scan said image.
  • 17. The method recited in claim 13 wherein step b) comprises using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to scan said image.
  • 18. The method recited in claim 13 comprising: prior to step a), lockingly engaging said implant abutment to said implant.
  • 19. The method recited in claim 13, further comprising the step of installing the restoration onto the abutment in place of the digital impression coping.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/740,769, filed on Jan. 13, 2020, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,042,979, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/516,981, filed on Oct. 17, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,561,478, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/800,784, filed on May 21, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,867,800, which claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/217,186, filed on May 27, 2009. The entireties of each of these applications are incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (111)
Number Name Date Kind
4769349 Hillig et al. Sep 1988 A
4772436 Tyszblat Sep 1988 A
4992297 Van der Zel Feb 1991 A
5052929 Seal Oct 1991 A
5296175 Iwasaki et al. Mar 1994 A
5395437 Chiou Mar 1995 A
5401170 Nonomura Mar 1995 A
5441408 Moschik Aug 1995 A
5443770 Krstic et al. Aug 1995 A
5662476 Ingber Sep 1997 A
5672055 Koutavas Sep 1997 A
5674073 Ingber Oct 1997 A
5698019 Frank et al. Dec 1997 A
5785911 Willkens et al. Jul 1998 A
5904483 Wade May 1999 A
5944526 Liu Aug 1999 A
5968856 Schweiger et al. Oct 1999 A
5975905 Kim et al. Nov 1999 A
5989029 Osorio Nov 1999 A
6007926 Provenzano et al. Dec 1999 A
6135773 Lazzara Oct 2000 A
6305939 Dawood Oct 2001 B1
6342458 Schweiger et al. Jan 2002 B1
6364660 Durbin et al. Apr 2002 B1
6386867 Durbin et al. May 2002 B1
6386876 Lee May 2002 B1
6420288 Schweiger et al. Jul 2002 B2
6431800 Suzuki Aug 2002 B1
6455451 Brodkin et al. Sep 2002 B1
6514893 Schweiger et al. Feb 2003 B1
6517623 Brodkin et al. Feb 2003 B1
6565357 Lazzara May 2003 B1
6592371 Durbin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6788986 Traber Sep 2004 B1
6802894 Brodkin et al. Oct 2004 B2
6824386 Halldin et al. Nov 2004 B2
6878456 Castro et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882894 Durbin et al. Apr 2005 B2
7118375 Durbin et al. Oct 2006 B2
7271100 Lee et al. Sep 2007 B2
7312924 Trissel Dec 2007 B2
7322824 Schmitt Jan 2008 B2
7328077 Durbin et al. Feb 2008 B2
7351060 Chih-Chung Apr 2008 B2
7381258 Krumbholz Jun 2008 B2
7494338 Durbin et al. Feb 2009 B2
7654823 Dadi Feb 2010 B2
7655586 Brodkin et al. Feb 2010 B1
7661956 Powell et al. Feb 2010 B2
7672504 Childers Mar 2010 B2
7892995 Castillo Feb 2011 B2
8077942 Yau Dec 2011 B2
8682043 Cahill Mar 2014 B2
8867800 Bullis Oct 2014 B2
8932058 Fisker Jan 2015 B2
9364299 Marlin Jun 2016 B2
10561478 Bullis Feb 2020 B2
11042979 Bullis Jun 2021 B2
20010048969 Castantino et al. Dec 2001 A1
20010053512 Nichinonni Dec 2001 A1
20020028425 Hurson Mar 2002 A1
20020039717 Amber Apr 2002 A1
20020055082 Durbin et al. May 2002 A1
20030082499 Halldin May 2003 A1
20030096214 Luthardt May 2003 A1
20040119180 Frank et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040133293 Durbin et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040197738 Ban et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050153257 Durbin et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050155518 Krumbholz Jul 2005 A1
20050177261 Durbin et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050203231 Halpert et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050261795 Ghosh Nov 2005 A1
20050288165 Krumbholz Dec 2005 A1
20060014390 Lee et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060019219 Saliger Jan 2006 A1
20060115793 Kopelman Jun 2006 A1
20060115795 Marshall Jun 2006 A1
20060154198 Durbin et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060183082 Quadling Aug 2006 A1
20060188844 Dadi Aug 2006 A1
20070047079 Trissel Mar 2007 A1
20070056467 Panzera Mar 2007 A1
20070059661 Dadi Mar 2007 A1
20070064242 Childers Mar 2007 A1
20070092854 Powell Apr 2007 A1
20070134496 Katagiri et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070160953 Tardieu Jul 2007 A1
20070218426 Quadling Sep 2007 A1
20080010085 Hahn Jan 2008 A1
20080050700 Weber et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080085489 Schmitt Apr 2008 A1
20080176188 Holzner et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080261176 Hurson Oct 2008 A1
20090087817 Jansen Apr 2009 A1
20090104583 Yau et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090115084 Moon May 2009 A1
20090220916 Fisker Sep 2009 A1
20090256274 Castillo Oct 2009 A1
20090258778 Castillo Oct 2009 A1
20090274999 Coopersmith Nov 2009 A1
20100083706 Castillo Apr 2010 A1
20100112520 Worthington May 2010 A1
20100112521 Chapel May 2010 A1
20100112527 Chapel May 2010 A1
20100255445 Gantes Oct 2010 A1
20110081627 Sun Apr 2011 A1
20110123954 Yau May 2011 A1
20110262884 Zena Oct 2011 A1
20120270179 Holmstrom Oct 2012 A1
20140162214 Jansen Jun 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (13)
Number Date Country
2762187 Dec 2010 CA
1471423 Dec 1969 DE
1618854 Jan 2006 EP
406007377 Jan 1994 JP
11019910 Jan 1999 JP
2009101124 May 2009 JP
20090028372 Mar 2009 KR
0134057 May 2001 WO
2006024098 Mar 2006 WO
WO-2009042888 Apr 2009 WO
2009060415 May 2009 WO
WO-2009060415 May 2009 WO
2010138175 Dec 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)
Entry
Single tooth immediate provisional restoration—Results, Michael Block et al., Dental Implants, 0278-2391, 2004, pp. 1131-1138 (Year: 2004).
CAD/CAM for Dental Restorations—Challanges, E. Dianne Rekow et al., IEEE, 1991, pp. 314-318 (Year: 1991).
An Overview of Dental CAD/CAM Systems, G. Uzun et al., 2008, pp. 530-535 (Year: 2008).
A Panorama of Dental CAD/CAM Restorative Systems, Perng-Ru Liu, Compendium, 2005, pp. 507-513 (Year: 2005).
International Search Report for PCT/US2010/001532 dated Oct. 25, 2010.
Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,784 dated Mar. 22, 2013.
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,784 dated Sep. 17, 2012.
Non-Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,784 dated Dec. 13, 2012.
Notice of Allowability for U.S. Appl. No. 12/800,784 dated Jun. 20, 2014.
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT No. PCT/US2010/001532 dated Nov. 29, 2011, in 5 pages.
Michael Block et al., Single tooth immediate provisional restoration—Results, Dental Implants, 0278-2391, 2004, pp. 1131-1138.
Extended European Search Report for PCT/US2010001532 dated Sep. 26, 2017, in 11 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210312623 A1 Oct 2021 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61217186 May 2009 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 16740769 Jan 2020 US
Child 17353105 US
Parent 14516981 Oct 2014 US
Child 16740769 US
Parent 12800784 May 2010 US
Child 14516981 US