This application is a national stage application under 35 USC 371 of PCT Application No. PCT/EP2018/058912 having an international filing date of Apr. 6, 2018, which is designated in the United States and which claimed the benefit of GB Patent Application No. 1705554.2 filed on Apr. 6, 2017, the entire disclosures of each are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
This invention relates to injector valves (dosers) used to inject a reductant such as urea into a vehicle exhaust system and in particular to a method to determine opening or closing events of the valve, such as for the purpose of detecting non-correctly operating dosers such as stuck injectors.
In modern engine systems it is common for injectors to inject reductant such as urea into the exhaust system for controlling emissions. The injector is often referred to as a doser and the systems which use these are typically referred to a SCR (selective catalytic reduction) systems. Such injectors are typically solenoid actuated injectors; where activation of a solenoid operates a valve to allow injection of reductant such as urea into the exhaust system.
It is known to detect the state (stuck/not stuck) of the doser (reductant injector) by using e.g. the point of inflection in the current trace (current flowing through the injector solenoid) to determine a valid opening or closing event of the valve so as to provide an indication of the operational state of the doser valve. However where the applied voltage to the solenoid comprises a chopped waveform (resulting in a chopped current waveform) such an approach is difficult. It is an object of the invention to provide a method to obtain information with respect to the operational state of a solenoid operated reductant dosers where the solenoid is activated using a chopped voltage/current waveform.
In one aspect is provided a method of detecting a valve opening or closing event in a solenoid operated reductant injector valve comprising the steps of:
Step e) may comprise determining whether the magnitude of the rate of change of said values is above a threshold, and if so determining that there is a valve opening or closing event.
Step e) may comprises determining if there is a step increase or decrease in said difference values.
Said sampling step b) may be performed by synchronising the sampling times with the modulation signal with respect to the voltage drive.
The method may include determining the valve opening or closing time from said rate of change.
In a further aspect is provided a method of detecting a valve opening or closing event in a solenoid operated reductant injector valve comprising the steps of:
Step d) may comprise determining the first or second derivatives of said plot and comparing these values to a threshold.
Step d) may include determining a glitch and determining a valve opening event therefrom.
Sampling step b) may be performed by synchronising the sampling times with the modulation signal with respect to the voltage drive.
The present invention is now described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The trace of the current is often analysed to provide useful data. It is also known to infer the temperature of the doser from the resistance calculated from R=V/I at the point at the end of the pull in phase; i.e. at the plateau marked by circle B in
Off highway vehicles often operate at 24v and it is expected that vehicle electrical systems will transition from 12v to 48 volt. This is due to the advantages of 48v supplies with mild hybrid powertrain systems. In such vehicles it is preferable not to have 24v/48v to 12v supply converters. Therefore it is desirable to drive components such as the SCR doser with 24v/48v rather than 12v. Operating the doser at 24v/48 volts continuously for the pull in phase would mean either high currents or a very short hold phase.
For higher voltage supply, the inventors have determined that the applied voltage can be chopped so as to produce a corresponding chopped waveform as shown in FIG. 4. This shows the current plots during the pull in phase (opening phase) fora non-chopped 12V system, 4, and a chopped pull in phase, 5.
Although the use of chopped waveforms have the aforementioned advantages, the problems with chopped methodology is that that detection of the doser opening point or start of injection (SOI) (inflexion point) using traditional methods will not work unless sampling is very fast. Both current waveforms in above figures have fast initial current rates. These will cause the doser to open faster. Hydraulically this will have some benefits but mechanically will introduce faster wear and impact the life of the product. In one example is a method to drive the doser at 24/48v and to chop the drive signal at 50/25% duty cycle effectively changing the drive voltage to 12v.
In one aspect, the sampling is performed in synchronised fashion during the rising or falling drive logic of the e.g. pulse width modulated voltage drive waveform to the solenoid/injector. In this way, points of local maxima and/or minima are sampled and used in analysis to detect the start of injections. This may be done in various ways as will now be described.
Technique 1
In one aspect the methodology the current is sampled in synchronised fashion during at the rising or falling drive logic with respect to the voltage (drive waveform) in order to capture points of local maxima and/or minima. These points are then used to provide a plot, where subsequent known analysis techniques are used e.g. to detect the start of injections by observation of glitches and such like.
In either case, curves/continuous plots can be derived from the sample points by joining the points of by any form of interpolation/curve fitting techniques. The start of injection point (doser opening) can then be determined from these plots of the points or the derived curves, using standard know techniques such as looking for points of inflection/glitches e.g. by looking at the first/second derivatives.
Technique 2
As can be seen when looking a ΔI over time there is a significant step increase in this difference value when the start of injection (doser opening occurs) at time T=1 second.
The step increase indicates a valve opening event and a step decrease indicated a valve closing event. In general the rate of change of the difference values may be analysed e.g. compared with a threshold to provide an indication of these event.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1705554.2 | Apr 2017 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2018/058912 | 4/6/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/185314 | 10/11/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5835330 | Kirschner et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
7418957 | Abe | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7685810 | Hirata | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7866333 | Boe | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7971426 | Van Nieuwstadt | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8079209 | Jung | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8276437 | Kitazawa | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8534049 | Reinhold | Sep 2013 | B2 |
9606023 | Peucat et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
10851695 | Xu | Dec 2020 | B2 |
20030033799 | Scheying | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20090132180 | Pearce et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100218484 | Arlt | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110239625 | Fokkelman | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120260632 | Hodgson | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130240040 | Kleinknecht | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20150113950 | Qiao et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102012209967 | Dec 2013 | DE |
102012216611 | Apr 2014 | DE |
102015204545 | Sep 2016 | DE |
2016173774 | Nov 2016 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20200072113 A1 | Mar 2020 | US |