Patent Grant
11550151
The invention relates to a method for determining an eye parameter of a user of a display device, the eye parameter may relate to the interpupillary distance of the user.
Usually, a person wishing to have an optical equipment goes to see an eye care practitioner.
The eye care practitioner orders the eyewear equipment at an optical lab by sending an order request to the optical lab. The order request may comprise wearer data, for example the wearer's prescription, fitting data, spectacle frame data, for example the type of spectacle frame the wearer has selected, and lens data, for example the type of optical lens the wearer has selected.
The determination of the wearer's prescription and fitting data may require carrying out complex and time consuming measurements. Such measurements usually require complex and costing material and qualified personnel to be carried out.
The usual methods for determining the eye parameters of the user are usually considered long and complex to implement.
For example, a person wanting to determine his or her Inter-Pupillary distance without the help of a third party may implement a method known as the mirror method.
The person needs a ruler with millimeter units and a mirror. To increase the measuring accuracy, the person is to be in a well-lit area so that he or she can line up the ruler and see the ruler markings. In order to get a good reading, the person needs to stand approximately 20 centimeters from the mirror. A person having viewing issues may need to adapt the distance or may need to use his or her ophthalmic lenses that may affect the measurement.
The person is to hold the ruler right above her or his eyes, straight across his or her eyebrows.
The person should keep her or his head straight and upright to ensure a proper measurement.
It's easier for the person to measure one eye at a time by closing the other eye. For example, the person may start by closing his or her right eye and hold the zero millimeter mark right above the exact center of his or her left pupil.
If the zero mark is not perfectly aligned with the center of the left pupil the whole measurement may be altered.
Without moving his or her head or the ruler at all, the person is to open his or her right eye and find the exact millimeter mark that falls on his or her right pupil.
To ensure an accurate reading the person need to look straight ahead at the mirror.
The millimeters that lines up with the exact center of his or her right pupil corresponds to the Inter-Pupillary distance of the person.
To assure an accurate determination of the Inter-Pupillary distance, the person is to repeat the measurements at least three or four times.
Other Inter-Pupillary distance determining methods exists but are usually as complex to implement or require the presence of an eye care professional.
Therefore, there is a need for a method for determining eye parameters of a person that would not be as complex and long to implement as the prior art methods.
One object of the present invention is to provide such method.
To this end, the invention proposes a method for determining an eye parameter, for example a geometrical eye parameter, of a user of a display device, the method comprising:
wherein the display parameter modifying step is repeated until image subjective quality of the perceived image is perceived as optimal by the user, and
Advantageously, the method of the invention allows the user determining his or her eye parameter using a simple and playful method. The user may further configure the display device or order an optical equipment based on the determined eye parameter.
Furthermore, the method of the invention enables carrying out tests in a more friendly or ecological situation.
According to further embodiments which can be considered alone or in combination:
The invention further relates to a computer program product comprising one or more stored sequences of instructions that are accessible to a processor and which, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to carry out at least the display image step, the display parameter modifying step and the eye parameter determining step of the method according to the invention.
The invention also relates to a computer-readable storage medium having a program recorded thereon; where the program makes the computer execute at least the display image step, the display parameter modifying step and the eye parameter determining step of the method of the invention.
The invention further relates to a device comprising a processor adapted to store one or more sequence of instructions and to carry out at least the display image step, the display parameter modifying step and the eye parameter determining step of the method according to the invention.
The invention further relates to a system for determining an eye parameter of a user of a display device, the system comprising:
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the following drawings in which:
Elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some of the elements in the figure may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve the understanding of the embodiments of the present invention.
The invention relates to a method for determining an eye parameter of a user of a display device.
The eye parameter may relate to the interpupillary distance and/or the position of the center of rotation of the eyes and/or the pupil diameter and/or the eye curvature of the user.
In the sense of the invention the interpupillary distance (IPD) is the distance between the center of the pupils of the two eyes of the user.
As illustrated on
A binocular display device is provided to the user during the display device providing step S1.
As represented on
An example of see-through display system is illustrated on
The display source 11 can be emissive or not emissive.
It can be directly obtained from either a spatial light modulator (SLM) such as a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), an organic light emitting diode array (OLED), liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS) or similar devices, or indirectly, by means of a relay lens or an optical fiber bundle. The display source 11 comprises an array of elements (pixels) imaged to infinity by the collimating device 13, for example a collimating lens.
The light-guide optical element 16 typically includes at least two major surfaces 20 and 22 and edges, at least one partially reflecting surface 24 and an optical element 26 for coupling light thereinto. The output waves 18 from the collimating device 13 enter the light-guide optical element 16 through its lower surface 20. The incoming waves (towards the light-guide optical element 16) are reflected from the surface 26 and trapped in the light-guide optical element 16.
In an embodiment, the see-through display system may comprise a plane light-guide optical element 16 with at least two planes major surfaces 20 and 22. For example, such a light guide optical element 16 may be one of Lumus Company.
In an alternative embodiment, the see-through display system may comprise a curved light-guide optical element 16.
The light-guide may be encapsulated in an optical lens or placed in front of an optical lens.
The display device is a binocular display device that according to some embodiment of the invention may be head mounted device as represented on
In this example, the display device comprises a frame. The frame may be similar to a conventional eyeglasses frame and can be worn with a similar comfort level. However, other implementations are possible, such as a face shield which is mounted to the user's head by a helmet, strap, hold by the user himself, or other means, for example VR HMD such as the Rift, the Gear VR or the DK2 from the company Oculus or the Google cardboard.
The frame includes a frame front 102 and temples 104 and 105. The frame front holds a see-through lens 101 for the user's left eye and a see-through lens 103 for the user's right eye. The left and right orientations are from the user's perspective.
The left-side see-through lens 101 includes an optical component 122 such as a beam splitter which mixes an augmented reality image with light from the real-world scene for viewing by the left eye.
The right-side see-through lens 103 includes an optical component 120 such as a beam splitter which mixes an augmented reality image with light from the real-world scene for viewing by the right eye.
A right-side augmented reality emitter 116 is mounted to the frame via an arm 114, and a left-side augmented reality emitter 108 is mounted to the frame via an arm 110.
An electrical power source, for example a battery, provides power to the different elements of the head mounted device.
Appropriate electrical connections can be made via conductive paths in the frame, for instance.
Component 122 and 120 may also include a dimmer that can be an electro active dimmer, such as an electrochromic device, or a liquid crystal dimmer.
This dimmer may be active so as to block light coming from external environment during the image display step S2, allowing the user not to be disturb and only perceive virtual image. This ensures that contrast is maximum.
The binocular display device provided during the display device providing step is configured to display independently images towards the two eyes of the user.
During the image display step S2, an image is displayed to the user when using the display device.
Furthermore, the binocular display device may be configured to display images towards the two eyes of the user having both independent features and common features.
The binocular display device may be configured to display similar features which can be different in some conditions and common in other ones. For example, the display distance can be the same, but the convergence angles of the two images are different.
According to a further example, the distances are different, but convergence angles are the same.
At least one display parameter of the binocular display device is modified during the display parameter modifying step S3 so as to modify the quality of the perceived image.
This can be achieved in different ways: displays generally have an adjustment lens between the eye and the display to compensate for the short distance and return the image to infinity.
The quality of the perceived image may be changed by adjusting the image to be displayed knowing the optical function of the adjustment lenses.
The quality of the perceived image may also be changed by adjusting the position of the adjustment lenses.
For example, according to an embodiment of the invention, the display device comprises moveable lenses through which the user sees the images displayed and during the display parameter modifying step S3 the lenses are moved so as to modify the quality of the perceived image.
Such variation is ideally continuous, but can also be carried in a discrete manner.
The display parameter modifying step s3 is repeated until the subjective quality of the perceived image is perceived by the user as optimal.
The subjective quality of the perceived image may relate to the distortion or the visibility of the perceived image.
The display image and display parameter modifying steps may be implemented in binocular vision. In other words, having the user use both eyes and displaying images to both eyes of the user.
Alternatively, the display image and display parameter modifying steps may be implemented in monocular vision. In other words, having the user use one eye at a time and displaying images to said eye of the user.
According to embodiment of the invention, the subjective quality of the perceived image relates to the subjective distortion of the perceived image.
Indeed, in most head mounted display devices, such as virtual reality helmets, optical lenses for returning the image to infinity are of very short focal length, usually no more than a few centimeters generating important distortions.
Such distortions are generally offset by opposite distortion on images displayed for a better quality of restitution of the virtual images.
For optimal compensation of the distortion it is best to consider the interpupillary distance of the user.
In most current systems the compensation is calculated for eyes centered on the optical center of the lens, the spacing is set at the interpupillary distance of the user in order to compensate optimally distortion at best.
If the user's interpupillary distance does not correspond to the distance between the optical centers of the two lenses a residual distortion appears to the user.
This residual distortion can thus be used to find the optimal position of the optical center of the lenses and thus determining the interpupillary distance of the user.
To determine the interpupillary distance of the user, one can move the lenses to determine the position of the lenses that minimize the subjective distortion of the perceived image.
When the display device is configured for centered compensation, the subjective distortion of the perceived image is minimum when the optical center of each lens is aligned with the pupils of the user.
The distance between the optical center of the lenses therefore provides the interpupillary distance of the user.
According to an embodiment of the invention, the interpupillary distance may be found without moving the lenses by modifying the image to be displayed to compensate the optical distortion induced by the lenses.
Using a ray tracing method, the skilled person may determine the interpupillary distance of the user from the modified image that minimizes the subjective distortion of the perceived image.
According an embodiment of the invention, the image displayed to the user is a grid. Advantageously, using a grid helps the user judge distortion.
For example, one can use a 3D virtual environment in which a grid is virtually fixed in front of the user, so that when the user moves his head, the image of the grid moves behind the lenses of the display system.
The residual distortions then changes dynamically. This condition is particularly suitable for detecting residual distortions.
Indeed, in a static mode the user is to determine whether the grid is deformed without reference mark but the human brain is particularly suitable for offset static deformation and the user may compensate for the distortion.
Whereas with dynamic distortion and especially if the vision is binocular, the human brain cannot compensate. The remaining distortions are perfectly perceptible and position measurement corresponding to the interpupillary distance of the user becomes very sensitive.
The method of the invention may further be used to locate the center of rotation of the eye of the user.
The first step is to locate the center of rotation of the eye of the user in a transverse plane, that is in a plane orthogonal to the optical axis of the display device and the pupil diameter of the user.
First a virtual image is displayed right in front of the user. The pupil of the user is then shifted, using a conventional refractive device as illustrated on
This generates a horizontal or vertical movable light beam, whose diameter is limited by the diameter of the micro-lens where is the active pixel, and this moving beam is perceived by the eye of the user only when it overlap at least partially the pupil of the user.
When the pupil of the user and the exit pupil of the display device don't overlap, the virtual image is hidden. When the pupil of the user and the exit pupil of the display device overlap, even partially, the virtual image is visible for the user.
One may consider the extreme value adjustment or micro-lens positions, X1 and X2, or Y1 and Y2 to which the virtual image appears or disappears for the user.
The average of these two values correspond to the position of the center of rotation of the eye CRE, that is
XCRE=(X1+X2)/2, and
YCRE=(Y1+Y2)/2.
The absolute value of the difference of these two values is the sum of the diameter DPD of the exit pupil of the display device and the diameter DP of the pupil of the user, that is |X2−X1|=DPD+DP.
Therefore, knowing the diameter of the exit pupil of the display device, one can determine the diameter of the pupil of the user, DP=|X2−X1|−DPD
To determine when the light beam is seen, the user can be asked to report it by pressing a button or equivalent.
In a second step, the radius RE of the eye of the user may be determined, that is to say the distance between the pupil and the center of rotation of the eye of the user.
An eccentric virtual object of a variable angle A is displayed on the edge of the visual field, and possibly shift the XCRE of a value dX in the opposite direction. If the maximum eccentricity of the device is reached, and the virtual image is still visible for the user dX is to be increased.
The offset of the user's pupil is the sum of the rotational movement and the initial offset that is RE*sin (A)+X, with RE the radius of the eye of the user.
When the virtual image disappears, the exit pupil ofthe device and the pupil of the user do not overlap anymore, the offset corresponds to half the sum of the diameters of the pupils.
So that: RE*sin (A)+X=DSP+DP, providing that
RE=(DSP+DP−X)/sin(A)
To measure both eyes, it is possible to make two consecutive monocular measures, or choose objects that the user cannot merge.
The invention has been described above with the aid of embodiments without limitation of the general inventive concept; in particular the mounted sensing device is not limited to a head mounted device.
Many further modifications and variations will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art upon making reference to the foregoing illustrative embodiments, which are given by way of example only and which are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, that being determined solely by the appended claims.
In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. The mere fact that different features are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these features cannot be advantageously used. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB2016/001707 | 10/28/2016 | WO |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2018/078411 | 5/3/2018 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5892540 | Kozlowski et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 20060072206 | Tsuyuki | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060238710 | Dick et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20080002262 | Chirieleison | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20150277123 | Chaum | Oct 2015 | A1 |
| 20160270656 | Samec et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
| 20160287153 | Samec et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
| 20170000324 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000325 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000326 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000329 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000330 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000331 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000332 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000333 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000334 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000335 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000337 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000340 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000341 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000342 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000343 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000345 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000454 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170000683 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170001032 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007111 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007115 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007116 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007122 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007123 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007182 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007450 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007799 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170007843 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170010469 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170010470 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170017083 | Samec et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
| 20170154464 | Lanier | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| 20170171533 | Benitez | Jun 2017 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2016149416 | Sep 2016 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 2, 2017, from corresponding PCT application No. PCT/IB2016/001707. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190310478 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |
