Information
-
Patent Grant
-
6564616
-
Patent Number
6,564,616
-
Date Filed
Wednesday, November 14, 200122 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, May 20, 200321 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
- Larkin; Daniel S.
- Politzer; Jay L
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 073 497
- 073 40
- 073 119 A
- 073 116
- 123 436
- 123 679
- 123 40613
- 701 99
- 701 102
- 701 103
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
There is described a method of diagnosing leakage in a common-rail injection system of an internal combustion engine having a number of cylinders; the injection system having a number of injectors, each supplying high-pressure fuel to a respective cylinder of the engine, and a fuel supply circuit supplying fuel to the injectors. The diagnosis method includes the steps of determining the contribution of each cylinder to the angular acceleration of the engine; determining, for each cylinder, an unbalance index indicating the unbalance of the angular acceleration contribution of the cylinder with respect to the angular acceleration contributions of the other cylinders; reducing, upon detection of a fault in the injection system, the amount of fuel injected into each cylinder; and distinguishing, for each injector, between a jammed-open injector condition and a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit, on the basis of the variation in the unbalance index of the respective cylinder following the fuel reduction.
Description
The present invention relates to a method of diagnosing leakage in an internal combustion engine common-rail injection system.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
As is known, of the various problems that can occur in a common-rail injection system, the worst and most dangerous are one or more of the injectors jamming in the open position, and fuel leakage in the high-pressure fuel supply circuit, which results in fuel discharge in the form of a very fine spray.
On the one hand, high-pressure fuel leakage may cause a fire if the fuel spray should strike particularly hot engine surfaces; and, on the other, a jammed-open injector results in continuous fuel supply to the cylinders, in turn resulting not only in excessive fuel consumption but also in abnormal combustion characterized by pressure peaks and a considerable temperature increase in the cylinders.
Such defects can only be tolerated so long without causing serious damage to the engine, e.g. to the connecting rod, piston, or injector nozzles, and may immediately impair performance and safety of the vehicle.
To safeguard against such hazards, diagnostic units were proposed to detect fuel leakage in the injection system and to act on the injection system to cut off fuel supply to the injectors and so stop the engine immediately.
More specifically, such units operated by comparing the fuel pressure in the common rail or total fuel consumption of the engine with respective threshold values, and determined the presence or not of any hazardous situations accordingly.
Common-rail injection systems, however, are also subject to fuel leakage in the low-pressure fuel supply circuit—caused, for example, by fine cracks in the low-pressure conduits—or to faulty low-pressure fuel supply circuit components preventing correct fuel supply to the high-pressure fuel supply circuit.
Such leakage and defects, however, are not as serious as a jammed-open injector or high-pressure fuel spray, by not immediately impairing engine performance or the safety of the vehicle, which, in such cases, in fact, can safely be driven at least to the nearest repair shop.
Known diagnostic units of the above type, however, were unable to distinguish between fuel leakage in the high-pressure fuel supply circuit and fuel leakage or faults in the low-pressure fuel supply circuit, so that, even in the case of minor, nonhazardous faults in the low-pressure fuel supply circuit, known diagnostic units immediately disabled the vehicle, thus causing considerable inconvenience to the driver, out of all proportion to the immediate danger involved.
One of the many solutions proposed to at least partly eliminate the above drawback is described in the Applicant's European Patent Application EP-0786593, which proposes a fuel catch structure for determining fuel leakage from the high-pressure fuel supply conduits connecting the injectors to the common rail.
More specifically, the fuel catch structure comprises a number of sleeves made of elastomeric material, surrounding the injector supply conduits, and for catching any fuel leaking from the conduits; a catch header connected to and for collecting from the sleeves any fuel leaking from the injector supply conduits; a fluid sensor located at the bottom of the catch header to generate a leak signal indicating the presence of fuel in the catch header; and an alarm circuit connected to the fluid sensor to generate an alarm signal in the presence of fuel in the catch header.
Though advantageous in many respects, the above solution has several drawbacks preventing its advantages from being fully exploited.
More specifically, fuel leakage from the high-pressure supply conduits is determined using additional dedicated components not normally provided on the vehicle—such as the sleeves, catch header, fluid sensor, and alarm circuit—and which, besides costing money to manufacture or purchase and assemble, also call for regular servicing.
Moreover, the catch structure described above was only capable of determining one type of fault in the high-pressure fuel supply circuit—namely, fuel leakage from the high-pressure supply conduits—so that any other faults in the high-pressure fuel supply circuit, such as a jammed-open injector, remained undiagnosed.
Another solution proposed to at least partly eliminate the above drawbacks is described in the Applicant's European Patent Application EP-0785349, which proposes a diagnostic unit designed to determine the type of fault in the high-pressure fuel supply circuit, and in particular to distinguish between a jammed-open injector and a generic fault in the high-pressure fuel supply circuit.
More specifically, the diagnostic unit employs an accelerometer signal related to engine vibration intensity and generated by an accelerometer sensor on the engine block; and a position signal indicating the angular position of the drive shaft (engine angle). More specifically, the diagnostic unit compares the amplitude of the accelerometer signal with a first reference value; compares with a second reference value the engine angle value at which the amplitude of the accelerometer signal exceeds the first reference value; and determines a jammed-open injector condition according to the outcome of the two comparisons.
Though advantageous in many respects, the above solution has one drawback preventing its advantages from being fully exploited.
More specifically, the type of fault in the high-pressure fuel supply circuit is determined using an additional dedicated component not normally provided on the vehicle, i.e. the accelerometer sensor, which, besides costing money to manufacture or purchase and assemble, also calls for regular servicing.
To eliminate the above drawback, the Applicant's European Patent Application EP-0785358 proposes a diagnostic unit designed to determine the type of fault in the fuel supply circuit as a whole, and in particular to distinguish between a jammed-open injector and a generic fault in the fuel supply circuit, without requiring the use of an additional accelerometer sensor not normally provided on the vehicle.
More specifically, the diagnostic unit first determines the presence of faults in the fuel supply circuit by comparing the fuel pressure in the common rail or the total fuel consumption of the engine with respective threshold values; and, in the event any faults are determined, distinguishes between a jammed-open injector and a generic fault in the fuel supply circuit on the basis of the engine torque, which is determined using a position and speed signal indicating the speed and angular position of the drive shaft and generated by a drive shaft speed and angular position detecting device already provided on the vehicle and substantially comprising a sound wheel fitted to the drive shaft, and an electromagnetic sensor associated with the sound wheel.
More specifically, if any faults are detected in the fuel supply circuit, the diagnostic unit reduces—in particular, cuts off—fuel injection into each engine cylinder; calculates, on the basis of said position and speed signal, the contribution of each cylinder to the value of the useful torque generated by the engine; compares each contribution with a respective reference value; and determines a jammed-open injector condition when at least one contribution is above the respective reference value, and a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit when all the contributions are below the respective reference values.
That is, if the diagnosed fuel leakage is caused by a fault in the fuel supply circuit, the reduction in the amount of fuel injected into the cylinders produces a corresponding reduction in the useful torque contribution of each cylinder; which reduction can easily be calculated as a function of the reduced injection time of each injector. Conversely, if the diagnosed fuel leakage is caused by a jammed-open injector, the reduction in the amount of fuel injected produces a smaller reduction in useful torque contributions than in the previous case, owing to the jammed-open injector feeding fuel continuously to the respective cylinder, which therefore shows no reduction in its contribution to the useful torque generated by the engine.
Though advantageous in many respects, the above solution has a minor drawback preventing its advantages from being fully exploited.
More specifically, a jammed-open injector is distinguished from a generic fault in the high-pressure supply circuit by comparing with a respective reference value the contribution of each cylinder to the useful torque generated by the engine. Computer simulation and road tests conducted by the Applicant, however, show fault diagnoses based on the above comparison to be unreliable in certain engine operating conditions. In particular, fault recognition problems may arise during transient operating states of the engine, e.g. during release.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a leakage diagnosis method designed to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks.
The present invention provides a method of diagnosing leakage in a high-pressure injection system of an internal combustion engine, which can comprise a number of cylinders. The injection system can comprise a number of injectors, each supplying high-pressure fuel to a respective cylinder of the engine, and a fuel supply circuit supplying fuel to the injectors. The diagnosis method can comprise the steps of: determining, for each of the cylinders, a quantity (AC
i
) related to the contribution of the cylinder to the torque generated by the engine; determining, for each of the cylinders, an unbalance index (IS
i
) indicating the unbalance of the quantity (AC
i
) related to the contribution of the cylinder to the torque generated by the engine with respect to the quantities (AC
i
) related to the contributions of the other cylinders to the torque generated by the engine; reducing, upon detection of a fault in the injection system, the amount of fuel injected into each of the cylinders; and distinguishing, for each of the injectors, between a jammed-open injector condition and a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit, on the basis of the variation in the unbalance index (IS
i
) of the respective cylinder following the fuel reduction.
In one embodiment of the diagnosis method, the quantity (AC
i
) related to the contribution of a cylinder to the torque generated by the engine can be the contribution of the cylinder to the angular acceleration of the engine.
In another embodiment of the diagnosis method, the unbalance index (IS
i
) associated with each of the cylinders can be related to the difference between the quantity (AC
i
) related to the contribution of the cylinder to the torque generated by the engine, and a mean value of the quantities (AC
i
) related to the contributions of the other cylinders to the torque generated by the engine.
In a further embodiment of the diagnosis method, the step of distinguishing, for each of the injectors, between a jammed-open injector condition and a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit can comprise the steps of: determining a differential unbalance index (D
i
) as a function of an unbalance index (IS
i
) prior to detection of the fault in the injection system, and of an unbalance index (IS
i
) following detection of the fault in the injection system; comparing the differential unbalance index (D
i
) with a threshold value (D
THi
); determining a jammed-open injector condition when the differential unbalance index (D
i
) has a first predetermined relationship with the threshold value (D
THi
); and determining a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit when the differential unbalance index (D
i
) does not have the first predetermined relationship with the threshold value (D
THi
).
In one exemplary embodiment of the diagnosis method, the differential unbalance index (D
i
) can be related to the difference between the unbalance index (IS
i
) prior to detection of the fault in the injection system, and the unbalance index (IS
i
) following detection of the fault in the injection system.
In another exemplary embodiment of the diagnosis method, the unbalance index (IS
i
) following detection of the fault in the injection system can be calculated at the end of a transient operating state generated by the reduction in the amount of fuel injected into the cylinders.
In a further exemplary embodiment of the diagnosis method, the unbalance index (IS
i
) prior to detection of the fault in the injection system can be calculated immediately prior to detection of the fault in the injection system.
In a still further exemplary embodiment of the diagnosis method, the step of determining a jammed-open injector can comprise the step of determining whether the differential unbalance index (D
i
) is greater than the threshold value (D
THi
).
In a still further exemplary embodiment of the diagnosis method, the step of determining a differential unbalance index (D
i
) can comprise the steps of: filtering the unbalance index (IS
i
) to generate a filtered unbalance index (ISF
i
); and determining the differential index (D
i
) as a function of an unbalance index (IS
i
) following detection of the fault in the injection system, and of a filtered unbalance index (ISF
i
) prior to detection of the fault in the injection system.
In another embodiment of the diagnosis method, the step of determining an unbalance index (IS
i
) for each of the cylinders can comprise the steps of: filtering the quantity (AC
i
) related to the contribution of the cylinder to the torque generated by the engine to generate a filtered quantity (ACF
i
) related to the contribution of the cylinder to the torque generated by the engine; and determining the unbalance index (IS
i
) as a function of the filtered quantity (ACF
i
).
In a further embodiment of the diagnosis method, the step of determining a fault in the injection system can comprise the steps of: determining the fuel pressure (P
RAIL
) of the fuel injected by the injectors; comparing the fuel pressure (P
RAIL
) with a threshold value (P
MIN
); and determining the fault in the injection system when the fuel pressure (P
RAIL
) has a first predetermined relationship with the threshold value (P
MIN
).
In an exemplary embodiment of the diagnosis method, the step of determining a fault in the injection system can comprise the step of determining whether the fuel pressure (P
RAIL
) is below the threshold value (P
MIN
).
In another embodiment of the diagnosis method, the fault in the injection system can be defined by a fuel leak in the injection system.
In a further embodiment of the diagnosis method, an engine can be provided which can comprise an exhaust gas recirculating system having a regulating valve. Additionally or alternatively, the diagnosis method can comprise the step of closing the regulating valve upon detection of the fault in the injection system.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A preferred, non-limiting embodiment of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1
shows a simplified diagram of a common-rail injection system;
FIG. 2
shows a flow chart of the leakage diagnosis method according to the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Number
1
in
FIG. 1
indicates as a whole a common-rail injection system for an internal combustion engine, in particular a diesel engine,
2
comprising a number of cylinders
4
, an output shaft
6
(shown schematically by the dot-and-dash line), and an exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) system
8
.
More specifically, exhaust gas recirculation system
8
provides for feeding part of the exhaust gas in the exhaust manifold of the engine back into the intake manifold of engine
2
, for reducing the combustion temperature and the formation of nitric oxide (NOx), and is shown schematically in
FIG. 1
by a conduit
10
fitted with a regulating valve
12
.
Injection system
1
substantially comprises a number of injectors
14
supplying high-pressure fuel to cylinders
4
of engine
2
; a high-pressure supply circuit
16
supplying high-pressure fuel to injectors
14
; and a low-pressure supply circuit
18
supplying low-pressure fuel to high-pressure supply circuit
16
.
Low-pressure supply circuit
18
comprises a fuel tank
20
; a supply pump
22
, e.g. electric, immersed in the fuel in tank
20
(but shown outside tank
20
for reasons of clarity); a high-pressure pump
24
connected to supply pump
22
by a low-pressure supply line
26
; and a fuel filter
28
located along low-pressure supply line
26
, between supply pump,
22
and high-pressure pump
24
.
High-pressure supply circuit
16
comprises a known common rail
30
connected by a high-pressure supply line
32
to high-pressure pump
24
, and by respective high-pressure supply conduits
34
to injectors
14
, which are also connected by respective recirculating conduits
36
to a drain line
38
, in turn connected to tank
20
to feed back into tank
20
part of the fuel used in known manner by and for operation of injectors
14
.
Drain line
38
is also connected to high-pressure pump
24
by a respective recirculating conduit
40
, and to supply pump
22
and fuel filter
28
by respective recirculating conduits
42
and respective overpressure valves
44
.
High-pressure pump
24
is fitted with an on/off, so-called shut-off, valve
46
(shown schematically) for permitting supply to the pumping elements (not shown) of high-pressure pump
24
when a difference in pressure exists between low-pressure supply line
26
and recirculating conduit
40
.
High-pressure supply circuit
16
also comprises a pressure regulator
48
connected between high-pressure supply line
32
and drain line
38
by a recirculating conduit
50
, and which, when activated, provides for feeding back into tank
20
part of the fuel supplied by high-pressure pump
24
to common rail
30
, and so regulating, in known manner not described in detail, the pressure of the fuel supplied by high-pressure pump
24
, and hence the fuel pressure in common rail
30
.
High-pressure supply circuit
16
also comprises a pressure relief device
52
connected on one side to common rail
30
and on the other side by a recirculating conduit
54
to drain line
38
, and which prevents the fuel pressure in common rail
30
from exceeding a predetermined maximum value.
Injection system
1
also comprises a diagnostic unit
56
for detecting and diagnosing leakage in injection system
1
.
More specifically, diagnostic unit
56
comprises a pressure sensor
58
connected to common rail
30
and generating a pressure signal S
P
related to the fuel pressure in common rail
30
and therefore to the fuel injection pressure; and a detecting device
60
for detecting the speed and angular position of output shaft
6
, and in turn comprising a known sound wheel
62
fitted to output shaft
6
, and an electromagnetic sensor
64
facing sound wheel
62
and generating a position and speed signal S
A
indicating the speed and angular position of sound wheel
62
and therefore the speed and angular position of output shaft
6
.
Diagnostic unit
56
also comprises an electronic central control unit
66
(forming part, for example, of a central engine control unit not shown) for controlling injection system
1
, and which receives pressure signal S
P
and position and speed signal S
A
, generates a first control signal supplied to pressure regulator
48
, a second control signal supplied to supply pump
22
, and a third control signal supplied to injectors
14
, and performs the operations described below with reference to
FIG. 2
to:
determine the presence of a fault in injection system
1
;
determine whether the fault is due to one or more jammed-open injectors; or to leakage in the fuel supply circuit caused, for example, by cracks in the high-pressure conduits; or to a generic fault in the low-pressure supply circuit; and
act appropriately on injection system
1
according to the type of fault diagnosed.
More specifically, each of the leakage diagnosis operations described below with reference to the
FIG. 2
flow chart is repeated by electronic central control unit
66
at a frequency which, as opposed to being constant, depends on the speed of engine
2
.
For example, each of the leakage diagnosis operations in the
FIG. 2
flow chart may be performed by electronic central control unit
66
at each fuel injection, i.e. at each engine cycle.
More specifically, as shown in
FIG. 2
, electronic central control unit
66
first acquires pressure signal S
P
and position and speed signal S
A
(block
100
), and determines, as a function of pressure signal S
P
, the instantaneous pressure value P
RAIL
of the fuel in common rail
30
, and, as a function of position and speed signal S
A
, a quantity AC
i
related to the contribution of each cylinder
4
to the useful torque generated by engine
2
(block
110
).
More specifically, quantity AC
i
is defined by the contribution of each cylinder
4
to the angular acceleration of output shaft
6
of engine
2
, which is hereinafter referred to as “angular acceleration contribution AC
i
”—where the subscript “i” indicates the respective cylinder
4
—and may, for example, be calculated as described in detail in the Applicant's European Patent Application EP 637738.
Calculating the angular acceleration contribution, as opposed to the torque contribution, of each cylinder
4
is preferred, firstly, because, as is known, the two quantities are closely related—in particular, are proportional—and, secondly, because calculating the torque contribution of each cylinder necessarily involves calculating the angular acceleration contribution anyway.
Electronic central control unit
66
then filters the angular acceleration contributions AC
i
of each cylinder
4
to generate, for each cylinder
4
, a sequence of filtered angular acceleration contributions ACF
i
(block
120
). More specifically, angular acceleration contributions AC
i
of each cylinder
4
are filtered in known manner, not described in detail, using a conventional low-pass numeric filter with a pass band for attenuating oscillations in engine speed induced by transmitting torque from the engine to the wheels.
As a function of respective filtered angular acceleration contributions ACF
i
, electronic central control unit
66
then calculates (block
130
), for each cylinder
4
, an unbalance index IS
i
indicating the unbalance of the respective filtered angular acceleration contribution ACF
i
with respect to the mean values of the filtered angular acceleration contributions ACF
i
of the other cylinders
4
, and which is calculated according to the equation;
where a
j
is the weight attributed to each filtered angular acceleration contribution ACF
i
, and may, for example, be a constant value a
j
=1/(n−1), where n equals the number of cylinders
4
of engine
2
.
Electronic central control unit
66
then filters the unbalance indexes IS
i
of each cylinder
4
to generate, for each cylinder
4
, a sequence of filtered unbalance indexes ISF
i
(block
140
). More specifically, the unbalance indexes IS
i
of each cylinder
4
are filtered in known manner, not described in detail, using a conventional numeric filter.
Simultaneously with the above operations in blocks
100
-
140
, electronic central control unit
66
compares the instantaneous pressure value P
RAIL
of the fuel in common rail
30
with a minimum pressure value P
MIN
, which is a function of engine speed and represents the minimum fuel pressure below which injection system
1
is definitely malfunctioning and calls for a procedure to determine the cause (block
150
).
For example, minimum pressure value P
MIN
may range between 120 and 200 bars, and, in particular, may be about 120 bars for engine speeds below 2300 rpm, about 200 bars for engine speeds over 2500 rpm, and may increase linearly from 120 to 200 bars for engine speeds between 2300 and 2500 rpm.
If instantaneous pressure value P
RAIL
is greater than or equal to minimum pressure value P
MIN
(NO output of block
150
), electronic central control unit
66
diagnoses no fault in injection system
1
and goes back to the input of block
150
to continue comparing instantaneous pressure value P
RAIL
and minimum pressure value P
MIN
. Conversely, if instantaneous pressure value P
RAIL
is below minimum pressure value P
MIN
(YES output of block
150
), electronic central control unit
66
diagnoses a leak in injection system
1
and performs the operations described below to determine whether leakage is due to one or more jammed-open injectors, or to a generic fault in high- and low-pressure supply circuits
16
,
18
.
More specifically, upon the fuel leakage being detected, electronic central control unit
66
memorizes the filtered unbalance index ISF
i
of each cylinder
4
immediately prior to the fault in injection system
1
being detected in block
150
(block
160
), cuts off injection to completely disable injectors
14
(block
170
), and closes regulating valve
12
of exhaust gas recirculating system
8
(block
180
).
More specifically, regulating valve
12
of exhaust gas recirculating system
8
is closed to reduce combustion dissymmetry in cylinders
4
of engine
2
caused by anomalous combustion in turn caused by recirculation of any unburned fuel in one or more of cylinders
4
, in the event one or more of injectors
14
are jammed open.
At this point, electronic central control unit
66
calculates a standby time T
0
as a function of prememorized close time values of regulating valve
12
of exhaust gas recirculating system
8
, and of the convergence of the numeric filters used to filter the angular acceleration contributions AC
i
of each cylinder
4
(block
190
), and switches to standby for said standby time T
0
, which is long enough for the transient state produced by injection cut-off and closure of regulating valve
12
to come to an end (block
200
).
At the end of standby time T
0
, electronic central control unit
66
calculates, for each cylinder
4
, a differential unbalance index D
i
equal to the difference between the unbalance index IS
i
calculated immediately after the end of standby time T
0
(i.e. immediately after a fault is detected in injection system
1
), and the filtered unbalance index ISF
i
calculated and memorized immediately prior to a fault being detected in injection system
1
(block
210
). A differential unbalance index D
i
for each cylinder
4
is calculated to recover any dispersion in the angular acceleration of individual cylinders
4
.
Electronic central control unit
66
then compares the differential unbalance index D
i
of each cylinder
4
with a respective threshold differential index D
THi
, which may be a constant value stored in the memory of electronic central control unit
66
, or may be calculated as a function of the engine operating point (air intake, load and speed, etc.) (block
220
).
If the differential unbalance index D
i
of a cylinder
4
is less than or equal to the respective threshold differential index D
THi
(NO output of block
220
), electronic central control unit
66
diagnoses a fault in high- and low-pressure supply circuits
16
,
18
. Conversely, if the differential unbalance index D
i
of a cylinder is greater than the respective threshold differential index D
THi
(YES output of block
220
), electronic central control unit
66
diagnoses a jammed-open injector.
More specifically, on detecting a fault in high- and low-pressure supply circuits
16
,
18
, electronic central control unit
66
limits the amount of fuel supplied to injectors
14
to limit the maximum amount of fuel that can be injected into each cylinder
4
(block
230
); commands pressure regulator
48
to limit the maximum pressure the fuel can assume inside common rail
30
(block
240
); and performs a further known diagnosis procedure, not described in detail, to determine whether the fault lies in high-pressure supply circuit
16
or low-pressure supply circuit
18
(block
250
).
Conversely, on detecting a jammed-open injector, electronic central control unit
66
disables supply pump
22
to cut off fuel supply to injectors
14
(block
260
); opens pressure regulator
48
to drain off the fuel in common rail
30
(block
270
); and disables all the injectors
14
to cut off fuel injection into cylinders
4
and so turn off engine
2
(block
280
).
Finally, electronic central control unit
66
displays and/or indicates acoustically the type of fault diagnosed on on-vehicle optical or acoustic indicating devices.
The advantages of the leakage diagnosis method according to the present invention are as follows:
First of all, it provides for distinguishing between fuel leakage in injection system
1
caused by a jammed-open injector, and a generic fault in the high- and low-pressure supply circuits, thus enabling drastic action to be taken on injection system
1
to stop engine
2
, and hence the vehicle, when this is actually called for by the gravity of the situation (jammed-open injector), and less drastic action to be taken on injection system
1
in the case of a less serious leak, so that the vehicle can reach the nearest repair shop.
Moreover, computer simulation and road tests conducted by the Applicant show the diagnosis method according to the present invention to be reliable in any operating condition of the engine, thus overcoming the limitation of the diagnosis method referred to previously.
Clearly, changes may be made to the diagnosis method as described and illustrated herein without, however, departing from the scope of the present invention.
For example, leakage in injection system
1
may be detected otherwise than as described with reference to block
150
.
More specifically, as opposed to comparing instantaneous pressure value P
RAIL
and minimum pressure value P
MIN
, it is possible to calculate a pressure error equal to the difference between instantaneous pressure value P
RAIL
and a reference pressure value P
REF
indicating the desired fuel pressure; compare the pressure error with a threshold value; and determine fuel leakage in injection system
1
when the pressure error is greater than the threshold value. Fuel leakage in injection system
1
, in fact, prevents the fuel in common rail
30
from reaching the desired pressure value (P
REF
), so that an inordinately high pressure error undoubtedly indicates leakage.
Alternatively, it is possible to compare the duty cycle of the control signal supplied to pressure regulator
48
with a threshold value; and determine leakage in injection system
1
when the duty cycle of the control signal is greater than the threshold value. Closure of pressure regulator
48
, in fact, is proportional to the duty cycle of the control signal supplied to it, and the greater the closure of pressure regulator
48
, the higher the fuel pressure P
RAIL
in common rail
30
should be, so that control signal duty cycle values above the normal range, e.g. constantly over 90%, indicate the difficulty of injection system
1
in reaching the desired injection pressure (P
REF
) and therefore the presence of a fuel leak in injection system
1
.
Moreover, the injection cut-off condition commanded by electronic central control unit
66
(block
170
) may be other than as described. In particular, as opposed to a total injection cut-off, in which each injector
14
is completely disabled and no fuel is injected into respective cylinder
4
, a partial injection cut-off condition may be implemented, in which each injector
14
is only partly disabled, and the amount of fuel injected into respective cylinder
4
is reduced by a predetermined amount, e.g. by half.
Claims
- 1. A method of diagnosing leakage in a high-pressure injection system of an internal combustion engine comprising a plurality of cylinders, the injection system comprising a plurality of injectors for supplying a high-pressure fuel to a respective cylinder of the engine and a fuel supply circuit for supplying fuel to the injectors; the diagnosis method comprising the steps of:determining, for each of the cylinders, a first quantity related to the contribution of the cylinder to the torque generated by the engine; determining, for each of the cylinders, an unbalance index indicating the unbalance of the first quantity with respect to a second quantity related to the contributions of the other cylinders to the torque generated by the engine; reducing, upon detection of a fault in the injection system, the amount of fuel injected into each of the cylinders; and distinguishing, for each of the injectors, between a jammed-open injector condition and a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit, on the basis of the variation in the unbalance index of the respective cylinder following the fuel reduction.
- 2. The diagnosis method of claim 1, wherein the first quantity is the contribution of the cylinder to the angular acceleration of the engine.
- 3. The diagnosis method of claim 1, wherein the second quantity is a mean value of the quantities related to the contributions of the other cylinders to the torque generated by the engine.
- 4. The diagnosis method of claim 1, wherein the step of distinguishing, for each of the injectors, between a jammed-open injector condition and a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit comprises the steps of:determining a differential unbalance index as a function of an unbalance index prior to detection of the fault in the injection system, and of an unbalance index following detection of the fault in the injection system; comparing the differential unbalance index with a threshold value; determining a jammed-open injector condition when the differential unbalance index has a first predetermined relationship with the threshold value; and determining a fault condition in the fuel supply circuit when the differential unbalance index does not have the first predetermined relationship with the threshold value.
- 5. The diagnosis method of claim 4, wherein the differential unbalance index is related to the difference between the unbalance index prior to detection of the fault in the injection system, and the unbalance index following detection of the fault in the injection system.
- 6. The diagnosis method of claim 4, wherein the unbalance index following detection of the fault in the injection system is calculated at the end of a transient operating state generated by the reduction in the amount of fuel injected into the cylinders.
- 7. The diagnosis method of claim 4, wherein the unbalance index prior to detection of the fault in the injection system is calculated immediately prior to detection of the fault in the injection system.
- 8. The diagnosis method of claim 4, wherein the step of determining a jammed-open injector comprises the step of determining whether the differential unbalance index is greater than the threshold value.
- 9. The diagnosis method of claim 4, wherein the step of determining a differential unbalance index comprises the steps of:filtering the unbalance index to generate a filtered unbalance index; and determining the differential index as a function of an unbalance index following detection of the fault in the injection system, and of a filtered unbalance index prior to detection of the fault in the injection system.
- 10. The diagnosis method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining an unbalance index for each of the cylinders comprises the steps of:filtering the first quantity to generate a filtered quantity related to the contribution of the cylinder to the torque generated by the engine; and determining the unbalance index as a function of the filtered quantity.
- 11. The diagnosis method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining a fault in the injection system comprises the steps of:determining the fuel pressure of the fuel injected by the injectors; comparing the fuel pressure with a threshold value; and determining the fault in the injection system when the fuel pressure has a first predetermined relationship with the threshold value.
- 12. The diagnosis method of claim 11, wherein the step of determining a fault in the injection system comprises the step of determining whether the fuel pressure is below the threshold value.
- 13. The diagnosis method of claim 1, wherein the fault in the injection system is defined by a fuel leak in the injection system.
- 14. The diagnosis method of claim 1, wherein an engine can be provided which can comprise an exhaust gas recirculating system having a regulating valve, further comprising the step of closing the regulating valve upon detection of the fault in the injection system.
Priority Claims (1)
Number |
Date |
Country |
Kind |
TO2000A17 |
Nov 2000 |
IT |
|
US Referenced Citations (5)
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number |
Date |
Country |
785358 |
Jul 1997 |
EP |
05332886 |
Dec 1993 |
JP |