This application is a national stage entry made under 35 U.S.C. § 371(c) of PCT International Application No. PCT/IB2017/000137, filed Feb. 21, 2017, which claims the benefit of Czech Republic Patent Application No. PV 2016-107, filed Feb. 24, 2016, the disclosures of both of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety
The disclosed embodiments relate to a door control without contact of the human hand, wherein a door leaf is provided with an opening and closing mechanism and a control mechanism. The disclosed embodiments also relate to a device for performing this method.
The prior art has long known closing mechanisms which automatically close a door or gate. These closing mechanisms are usually composed of various springs or even hydraulic systems that, when opening the door or gate, accumulate some energy that is used to automatically close the door or gate. Such closing mechanisms are often provided with damping elements to prevent slamming of the door. These closing mechanisms may be used in public spaces such as public welfare facilities in order to ensure automatic closure of areas, for example, public toilets and so on.
Known devices such as U.S. Patent Application Publication 2009/320,236 and Japanese Patent Application No. 0953365 teach that when opening the door by a traditional way by the force of the hand on the door leaf, accumulating part of the energy spent on opening does not result in subsequent automatic closure. Additionally, the energy which facilitates opening the door must be overcome by the force of the closing mechanism. Japanese Patent Application No. 02167975 teaches opening the door in a conventional manner, wherein when the door is opened halfway, then the door completely opens and then the door completely closes. All of the above devices fail to address controlling the door with another part of the body other than the hands, and activation is always necessary to move the leaf.
U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/01450373 teaches a door closing mechanism provided in the direction of opening against a person using a leg or other body part. U.S. Patent Application No. 2013/0118085 teaches a door frame having a lever mechanism with a spring acting against the force of a closing spring. The disadvantage is that, when opening, it is necessary to overcome the force of the closing mechanism. These devices have a major drawback in that the operator must simultaneously apply work force and simultaneously give way to the opening door leaf. This complicates the use even for healthy people, disabled people, elderly people or children, that cannot use such a device in practice.
Additionally, there are electrical devices for automatically opening and closing doors Common drawbacks to these devices are the high cost, the need for power supply, regular electric revisions and ensuring safety in difficult conditions.
A particular problem of public toilets is the transmission of infectious diseases from hands of visitors, a solution to which can only be complete exclusion of hand contact with the door or the door fittings, especially when opening the door towards you. This problem is most serious in a situation where a human coming out of the stall toilet does not have any possibility to perform hand hygiene and must touch the unclean parts of the door. A similar problem occurs in public spaces in general, including fast food places, restaurants and cafeterias, offices, cinemas, concert halls, schools etc. This problem also occurs in sterile areas such as operating theaters, hospitals, clean production and so on. Finally, the aforementioned problem can occur even in private areas.
The closest known solution to the above problem in this respect is the device for door control according to Czech Republic Patent No. 304,182. This solution discloses a device wherein the opening mechanism operated by the foot door opening ensures that an exerted force overcomes the closing mechanism integrated in the door. The solution described in this patent, because of this principle, needs considerable power to open the door, and thus, it becomes difficult to open the door, e.g. for children or disabled persons.
The embodiments described herein disclose a process to control doors without contacting the human hand and the structure of the control system for a door that, when using the optimized operating force, allows the automatic opening and closing of the door without touching the door leaf by hand.
The problem is solved and the drawbacks of the known solutions of this kind are largely eliminated by controlling the door without touching the human hand. The embodiments disclosed teach that in the action of optimizing external force on the door, when the door is closed, the force simultaneously activates an opening and closing mechanism fitted on the door leaf. When opening the door, the closing mechanism is blocked. When closing the door, the opening mechanism is blocked. Accordingly, the opening and closing force do not act against each other. The opening and closing mechanism is initiated by the control mechanism, which is preferably arranged in the lower region of the door leaf. It is obvious that if a control mechanism to be controlled preferably by foot, ideally by a shoe sole of a passing person, should be arranged in the lower area of the door leaf, preferably even at the lower edge of the door leaf.
The method of controlling the door without contacting a human hand is performed by a device having a door leaf that is provided with an opening and closing mechanism mounted preferably on the axis of the hinges of the door leaf. These mechanisms as a whole are connected with a control mechanism in the lower part of the door leaf.
The control mechanism, which works on a mechanical principle, is arranged in the lower region of the door leaf and enables opening of the door towards and away from the passing person, using a foot operated tread arm. Another possibility for controlling the door leaf lies in the fact that the opening and closing mechanism is pneumatic. The opening and closing mechanism may be a pneumatic-hydraulic device. The opening and closing mechanism may be a hydraulic energy accumulation device. The opening and closing mechanism is provided with a rotating member adapted so that, on actuation of the actuating mechanism, the rotating member is rotated either in an opposite direction to door leaf opening or, alternatively, in the opening direction of the door leaf. A control mechanism which is arranged in the lower part of the door leaf is provided with a tread arm.
A substantial advantage of the disclosed embodiments is that it completely eliminates the need to touch the door leaf by hand. Accordingly, the device substantially reduces the risk of transmission of infectious diseases and make visits of public toilet facilities for visitors more pleasant.
The solution described has a number of technical and economic advantages, including the possibility of installation on an existing door leaf and the fact that the function and operation of the door leaf it is not significantly affected by the installation. The device can also be used for blocking the door in the open position without touching a human hand. In the case that the installed opening and closing mechanism is not activated, the closing and opening mechanism works only as a door closer. The entire system is designed to prevent any damage by careless operation.
The device will be further illustrated by the drawings and diagrams, in which a mechanical solution is described using torsion springs for the opening and closing mechanism. It is activated by rotating the rotating member in an opposite direction to the opening direction of the door leaf.
Because the disclosed embodiments relate to a control system of one door leaf, which operates independently of a possible control system on a second door leaf, the disclosed embodiments will be further explained by an example of a single-leaf door.
When the opening and closing mechanism 100 is activated, a rotating member 5 can either be rotated in the same or the opposite direction to the rotation of a door leaf 1. In a further explained solution the closing mechanism is used in the opposite direction.
The control mechanism 200 can be implemented by various technical means. A variant with the control mechanism 200 is that the mechanism 200 provides for optimization of a driving force with continuous automatic shift of the gear ratio.
In some embodiments, the opening member 14 and the closing member 17 include torsion springs.
The present disclosure enables opening of the door leaf 1 away from the passing person and, in particular, towards the passing person and subsequent automatic closure without the need to touch anything on the door by hand. The door leaf 1 is additionally provided with the opening and closing mechanism 100, preferably in the lower part of the door leaf 1. The opening and closing mechanism 100 can be activated using the control mechanism 200 and connecting member 23. For example by pressing the control mechanism 200 with the foot, the door leaf 1 opens and subsequently closes automatically. The opening and closing mechanism 100 is mounted on the side of the door leaf 1 so that the door leaf 1 opens towards the passing person, who would otherwise have had to pull the door leaf 1 by hand. On the opposite side of the door leaf 1, which opens from the passing person, such a control mechanism 200 does not need to be mounted because the passing person could push the door leaf 1 by foot, shoulder, elbow, knee, orthopedic aids, etc. For uniformity of the door leaf 1, it is appropriate that the front part of the control mechanism 28 and the rear part of the control mechanism 29 are arranged on both sides of the door leaf 1, as shown in
The described example could also be designed so that the opening and closing mechanism 100 does not include a torsion spring, but is pneumatic-hydraulic device, pneumatic device, or a hydraulic energy accumulation device.
For several reasons, a purely mechanical structure may be advantageous. In such an embodiment, the opening member 14 and closing member 17 include a torsion spring that acts as an energy accumulator for opening and closing the door leaf 1.
Opening and closing mechanism 100, according to
Furthermore, there is a possibility that the passing person holds the door leaf 1 before the latch 7 is disengaged, for example again by the person's foot. This will ensure that the door leaf 1 with carrier 22 will not have enough inertial force to leave the point of contact with the latch 7, and thus the opening member 14 remains in activated position, as shown in
Control mechanism 200 may be arranged on one side of the door leaf 1, while on the opposite side of the door leaf 1, control mechanism 200 may be on the same axis arranged next to the tread arm 34, as shown in
Opening member 14 exerts no force. The closing member 17 develops only the preload force to keep the door leaf 1 closed. The latch 7 is in the disengaged position, shown in
The schematic arrangement is shown in
The front part of the control mechanism 28 and the rear part of the control mechanism 29, if it is mounted, are activated, that is they are in the lower position, shown in
Opening member 14 is rotated by the rotating member 5 via a twist of the opening member fastener 15 against the opening member support arm 16, which leans on frame 3 and wall 2 to develop full torque. The closing member 17 also develops full torque by twisting the closing member fastener 18 against the closing member support arm 19, which leans on the door leaf 1, as shown in
The latch 7 is in the activated position because it does not lean on the stop 6 and the latch spring 9 keeps it in the activated state, as shown in
The front part of the control mechanism 28 and the rear part of the control mechanism 29, if it is mounted, are in the activated position, as shown in
This solution has a number of technical and economic benefits, including the possibility of installation on an existing door leaf 1 and the fact that the solution does not fundamentally affect the function and operation of the door leaf 1 when the opening and closing mechanism 100 is not activated, it works only as a closer.
The disclosed embodiments are applicable in all fields where it is necessary to open and close the door without touching it with human hand due to hygienic reasons, or even in cases where the opening by hand is difficult, for example when the passing person has full hands.
Another possible function is to stop the door in the open position. That could be advantageous for example for hospitals, restaurants, storage etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
CZ2016-107 | Feb 2016 | CZ | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2017/000137 | 2/21/2017 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/144965 | 8/31/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
228314 | Clark | Jun 1880 | A |
418736 | Means | Jan 1890 | A |
560478 | Cougill | May 1896 | A |
750363 | Hicks | Jan 1904 | A |
762729 | Lee | Jun 1904 | A |
839330 | Stephenson | Dec 1906 | A |
948737 | McKee | Feb 1910 | A |
993941 | Alter | May 1911 | A |
1555420 | Knox | Sep 1925 | A |
1611386 | Stanley | Dec 1926 | A |
2634970 | Rosebrook | Apr 1953 | A |
5205015 | Huang | Apr 1993 | A |
20090320236 | Yamamuro | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20130118085 | Hedemark | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2290938 | Sep 1996 | CN |
323128 | Jul 1920 | DE |
2979936 | Mar 2013 | FR |
1266985 | Mar 1972 | GB |
H02167975 | Jun 1990 | JP |
H0953365 | Feb 1997 | JP |
H11336413 | Dec 1999 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/IB2017/000137, filed Feb. 21, 2017, completed on Jun. 20, 2017, 9 pages. |
Czech Republic Search Report for Czech Republic Patent Application No. PV 2016-107, completed on Oct. 25, 2016, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190048638 A1 | Feb 2019 | US |