Multiband antennas for wireless voice and data communications are known. For example, common frequency bands for GSM services include GSM900 and GSM1800. A low band of frequencies in a multiband antenna may comprise a GSM900 band, which operates at 880-960 MHz. The low band may also include Digital Dividend spectrum, which operates at 790-862 MHz. Further, the low band may also cover the 700 MHz spectrum at 698-793 MHz.
A high band of a multiband antenna may comprise a GSM1800 band, which operates in the frequency range of 1710-1880 MHz. A high band may also include, for example, the UMTS band, which operates at 1920-2170 MHz. Additional bands may comprise LTE2.6, which operates at 2.5-2.7 GHz and WiMax, which operates at 3.4-3.8 GHz.
When a dipole element is employed as a radiating element, it is common to design the dipole so that its first resonant frequency is in the desired frequency band. To achieve this, the dipole arms are about one quarter wavelength, and the two dipole arms together are about one half the wavelength of the desired band. These are commonly known as “half-wave” dipoles. Half wave dipoles are fairly low impedance, typically in the range of 73-7552.
However, in multiband antennas, the radiation patterns for a lower frequency band can be distorted by resonances that develop in radiating elements that are designed to radiate at a higher frequency band, typically 2 to 3 times higher in frequency. For example, the GSM1800 band is approximately twice the frequency of the GSM900 band.
There are two modes of distortion that are typically seen, Common Mode resonance and Differential Mode resonance. Common Mode (CM) resonance occurs when the entire higher band radiating structure resonates as if it were a one quarter wave monopole. Since the vertical structure of the radiator (the “feed board”) is often one quarter wavelength long at the higher band frequency and the dipole arms are also one quarter wavelength long at the higher band frequency, this total structure is roughly one half wavelength long at the higher band frequency. Where the higher band is about double the frequency of the lower band, because wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, the total high band structure will be roughly one quarter wavelength long at a lower band frequency. Differential mode occurs when each half of the dipole structure, or two halves of orthogonally-polarized higher frequency radiating elements, resonate against one another.
One known approach for reducing CM resonance is to adjust the dimensions of the higher band radiator such that the CM resonance is moved either above or below the lower band operating range. For example, one proposed method for retuning the CM resonance is to use a “moat”. See, for example, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/479,102, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. A hole is cut into the reflector around the vertical section of the radiating element (the “feedboard”). A conductive well is inserted into the hole and the feedboard is extended to the bottom of the well. This lengthens the feedboard, which moves the CM resonance lower and out of band, while at the same time keeping the dipole arms approximately one quarter wavelength above the reflector. This approach, however, entails extra complexity and manufacturing cost.
This disclosure covers alternate structures to retune the CM frequency out of the lower band. One aspect of the present invention is to use a high-impedance dipole as the radiating element for the high band element of a multi-band antenna. Unlike a half-wave dipole, a high impedance element is designed such that its second resonant frequency is in the desired frequency band. The impedance of a dipole operating in its second resonant frequency is about 400Ω-600Ω typically. In such a high impedance dipole, the dipole arms are dimensioned such that the two dipole arms together span about three quarters of a wavelength of the desired frequency. In another aspect, the dipole arms of the high impedance dipole couple capacitively to the feed lines on the vertical stalks.
A multiband radiating array according to the present invention includes a vertical column of lower band dipole elements and a vertical column of higher band dipole elements. The lower band dipole elements operate at a lower operational frequency band. The higher band dipole elements operate at a higher frequency band, and the higher band dipole elements have dipole arms that combine to be about three quarters of a wavelength of the higher operational frequency band midpoint frequency. The higher band radiating elements are supported above a reflector by higher band feed boards. A combination of the higher band feed boards and higher band dipole arms do not resonate in the lower operational frequency band.
Such higher band dipole arms resonate at a second resonant frequency in the higher operational frequency band, not at a first resonant frequency such as a half-wave dipole. The lower operational frequency band may be about 790 MHz-960 MHz. The higher operational frequency band may be about 1710 MHz-2170 MHz or, in ultra-wideband applications, about 1710 MHz-2700 MHz. The present invention may be most advantageous when the higher operational frequency band is about twice the lower operational frequency band.
In one aspect of the invention, the dipole arms of the higher band radiating elements are capacitively coupled to feed lines on the higher band feed boards. For example, the higher band feed board include a balun and a pair of feed lines, wherein each feed line is capacitively coupled to an inductive section, and each inductive section is capacitively coupled to a dipole arm. This separates the dipoles from the stalks at low band frequencies so they do not resonate as a monopole.
In another aspect of the invention, a radiating element includes first and second dipole arms supported by a feedboard. Each dipole arm has a capacitive coupling area. The feedboard includes a balun and first and second CLC matching circuits coupled to the balun. The first matching circuit is capacitive coupled to the first dipole arm and the second matching circuit is capacitively coupled to the second dipole arm. The first and second matching circuits each comprise a CLC matching circuit having, in series, a stalk, coupled to the balun, a first capacitive element, an inductor, and a second capacitive element, the second capacitive element being coupled to a dipole arm. The capacitive elements may be selected to block out-of-band induced currents.
The capacitors of the CLC matching circuits may be shared across different components. For example, the first capacitive element and an area of the stalk may provide the parallel plates of a capacitor, and the feedboard PCB substrate may provide the dielectric of a capacitor. The second capacitive element may combine with and capacitive coupling area of the dipole arm to provide the second capacitor.
The low band radiating element 16 also comprises a half-wave dipole, and includes first and second dipole arms 22 and a feed board 24. Each dipole arm 22 is approximately one-quarter wavelength long at the low band operating frequency. Additionally, the feed board 24 is approximately one-quarter wavelength long at the low band operating frequency.
In this example, the combined structure of the feed board 20 (one-quarter wavelength) and dipole arm 18 (one-quarter wavelength) is approximately one-half wavelength at the high band frequency. Since the high band frequency is approximately twice the low band frequency, and wavelength is inversely proportional to frequency, this means that the combined structure also is approximately one-quarter wavelength at the low band operating frequency. As illustrated in
The high band radiating element 114a comprises a high impedance dipole, and includes first and second dipole arms 118 and a feed board 20a. In a preferred embodiment, the dipole arms 118 of the high band radiating element 114a are dimensioned such that the aggregate length of the dipoles arms 118 is approximately three-fourths wavelength of the center frequency of the high band. In wide-band operation, the length of the dipoles may range from 0.6 wavelength to 0.9 wavelength of any given signal in the higher band. Additionally, the feed board 20a is approximately one-quarter wavelength long at the high band operating frequency, keeping the radiating element 114a at the desired height from the reflector 12. In an additional embodiment, a full wavelength, anti-resonant dipole may be employed as the high-impedance radiating element 114a.
In the embodiments of the present invention disclosed above, the combination of the feed board 20a and high impedance dipole arm 118 exceeds one-quarter of a wavelength at low band frequencies. Lengthening the combination of the feed board and dipole arm lengthens the monopole, and tunes CM frequency down and out of the lower band.
In another example, tuning the CM frequency up and out of the lower band may be desired. This example preferably includes capacitively-coupled dipole arms on the high band, high impedance dipole arms 118.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide an improved feed board matching circuit to reject common mode resonances. For the reasons set forth above, capacitive coupling is desirable, but an inductive section must be included to re-tune the feedboard once the capacitance is added. However, when the inductor sections 132 are connected to the feed lines 124, the inductor sections 132 coupled with feed lines 124 tend to extend the overall length of the monopole that this high band radiator forms. This may produce an undesirable common mode resonance in the low band.
Additional examples illustrated in
The first capacitor section 134 is introduced to couple capacitively from the feed lines 124 to the inductive sections 132 at high band frequencies where the dipole is desired to operate and acts to help block some of the low band currents from getting to the inductor sections 132. This helps reduce the effective length of the monopole that the high band radiator forms in the lower frequency band and therefore pushes the Common Mode Resonance Frequency higher so that it is up out of the desired low band frequency range. For example,
Referring to
While
The antenna array 110 according to one aspect of the present invention is illustrated in plan view in
The antenna array 210 of
The base station antenna systems described herein and/or shown in the drawings are presented by way of example only and are not limiting as to the scope of the invention. Unless otherwise specifically stated, individual aspects and components of the antennas and feed network may be modified, or may have been substituted therefore known equivalents, or as yet unknown substitutes such as may be developed in the future or such as may be found to be acceptable substitutes in the future, without departing from the spirit of the invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/508,355 filed Jul. 11, 2019, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/792,917 filed Oct. 25, 2017, which is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/683,424 filed Apr. 10, 2015, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/978,791 filed Apr. 11, 2014, and titled “Method Of Eliminating Resonances In Multiband Radiating Arrays” the disclosures of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3922683 | Kumpebeck | Nov 1975 | A |
5818385 | Bartholomew | Oct 1998 | A |
6034649 | Wilson et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6323820 | Haunberger | Nov 2001 | B1 |
20030058184 | Barna | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20060273865 | Timofeev et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20090135078 | Lindmark et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20140139387 | Jones | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1296651 | Apr 2004 | CN |
1567744 | Jan 2005 | CN |
1886864 | Dec 2006 | CN |
101682116 | Mar 2010 | CN |
102403567 | Jan 2014 | CN |
2863111 | Jun 2005 | FR |
2007011295 | Jan 2007 | WO |
2008124442 | Oct 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 21171913.3, dated Jun. 11, 2021, 7 pages”. |
“Examination Report, corresponding to India Patent Application No. 201627024437, dated May 29, 2020, 5 pages”. |
“International Search Report regarding related international application PCT/US2015/025284, dated Jul. 3, 2015 (4 pgs)”. |
“Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability Corresponding to International Application No. PCT/US2015/025284; dated Oct. 20, 2016; 8 Pages”. |
“Office Action, corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201580010628.2, dated May 3, 2018 (English translation only), 19 pages”. |
“Office Action, corresponding to Chinese Patent Application No. 201910105930.6, dated Apr. 3, 2020 (English translation only), 10 pages”. |
“Written Opinion regarding related International application PCT/US215/025284, dated Jul. 3, 2015 (5 pgs).” |
“Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, corresponding to European Patent Application No. 15717780.9-1206, dated Jul. 15, 2021, 4 pages”. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210234275 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61978791 | Apr 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16508355 | Jul 2019 | US |
Child | 17231112 | US | |
Parent | 15792917 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 16508355 | US | |
Parent | 14683424 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15792917 | US |