Method of estimating a current channel condition in a wireless communications network

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8965440
  • Patent Number
    8,965,440
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, May 31, 2005
    19 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 24, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
In the method, a current channel condition is estimated based at least in part on a previous channel quality indicator and power control information received after the previous channel quality indicator.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates generally to a wireless communications network, and more particularly, to a method of estimating a current channel condition in a wireless communications network.


2. Description of the Related Art


A cellular communications network typically includes a variety of communication nodes coupled by wireless or wired connections and accessed through different types of communications channels. Each of the communication nodes includes a protocol stack that processes the data transmitted and received over the communications channels. Depending on the type of communications system, the operation and configuration of the various communication nodes can differ and are often referred to by different names. Such communications systems include, for example, a Code Division Multiple Access 2000 (CDMA2000) system and Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS).


UMTS is a wireless data communication and telephony standard which describes a set of protocol standards. UMTS sets forth the protocol standards for the transmission of voice and data between a base station (BS) or Node B and a mobile or User Equipment (UE). UMTS systems typically include multiple radio network controllers (RNCs). The RNC in UMTS networks provides functions equivalent to the Base Station Controller (BSC) functions in GSM/GPRS networks. However, RNCs may have further capabilities including, for example, autonomously managing handovers without involving mobile switching centers (MSCs) and Serving General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) Support Nodes (SGSNs). The Node B is responsible for air interface processing and some Radio Resource Management functions. The Node B in UMTS networks provides functions equivalent to the Base Transceiver Station (BTS) in GSM/GPRS networks. Node Bs are typically physically co-located with existing GSM base transceiver station (BTS) to reduce the cost of UMTS implementation and minimize planning consent restrictions.



FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional communication system 100 operating in accordance with UMTS protocols. Referring to FIG. 1, the communication system 100 may include a number of Node Bs such as Node Bs 120, 122 and 124, each serving the communication needs of UEs such as UEs 105 and 110 in their respective coverage area. The Node Bs are connected to an RNC such as RNCs 130 and 132, and the RNCs are connected to a MSC/SGSN 140. The RNC handles certain call and data handling functions, such as, as discussed above, autonomously managing handovers without involving MSCs and SGSNs. The MSC/SGSN 140 handles routing calls and/or data to other elements (e.g., RNCs 130/132 and Node Bs 120/122/124) in the network or to an external network. Further illustrated in FIG. 1 are conventional interfaces Uu, Iub, Iur and Iu between these elements.


Third generation wireless communication protocol standards (e.g., 3GPP-UMTS, 3GPP2-CDMA, etc.) may employ a dedicated traffic channel in the uplink (e.g., a communication flow between a mobile station (MS) or UE and a base station (BS) or Node B). The dedicated traffic channel may include a data part (e.g., a dedicated physical data channel (DPDCH) in accordance with UMTS protocols, a fundamental channel or supplemental channel in accordance with CDMA2000 protocols, etc.) and a control part (e.g., a dedicated physical control channel (DPCCH) in accordance with UMTS protocols, a pilot/power control sub-channel in accordance with CDMA2000 protocols, etc.).


High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) is introduced in Release 5 of the third generation wireless standards for 3GPP-UMTS. To achieve high-speed data transmissions, two new channels in the downink are introduced; namely, a high speed shared control channel (HS-SCCH) and a high speed downlink shared channel (HS-DSCH). The HS-SCCH carries the control information for the HS-DSCH (the actual packet data). The HS-DSCH is transmitted using a high speed physical downlink shared channel (HS-PDSCH). The HS-SCCH and HS-PDSCH for one cell (e.g., one of Node Bs 120, 122, 124, etc.) are shared by all HSDPA users (e.g., UE 105, UE 110, etc.) in that cell. A Node B scheduler (e.g., for one of Node B 120, Node B 122, Node B 124, etc.) decides which UE (e.g., UE 105/110) to transmit to, a given amount of data to transmit, a given power level for the transmission and a given modulation/coding format for the transmission based on a number of factors, such as an instantaneous downlink quality, quality of services (QoS) requirements, etc. After the Node B scheduler determines the parameters for the transmission, the transmission is scheduled. The data format as well as user identification information is carried in the HS-SCCH that accompanies the HS-PDSCH.


Knowledge of real-time downlink channel quality at the Node B scheduler may affect the efficiency of a HSDPA system. In the current UMTS-HSDPA standards, the downlink channel quality is determined by measuring the channel quality at the UE (e.g., UE 105, UE 110, etc.) and having the UE report the measured channel quality to the Node B (e.g., Node B 120, Node B 122, Node B 124, etc.) through a code channel in the uplink. The uplink code channel is a newly introduced high speed dedicated physical control channel (HS-DPCCH). The HS-DPCCH is introduced in Release 5 of the third generation wireless standards for 3GPP-UMTS to support HSDPA operations and may carry acknowledgment (ACK) and negative ACK (NACK) signals as well as a channel quality indicator (CQI) signal. The measured channel quality may be quantized (e.g., to a 5 bit binary number) at the UE to generate the CQI signal. At the Node B, the CQI signal may be converted into a channel quality metric, for example a common pilot channel (CPICH) carrier-to-noise ratio (Ec/Nt).


For stationary or very low mobility (e.g., slow moving) UEs, the Node B scheduler may use the CPICH Ec/Nt as a measure of the UE's current channel quality because the UE is moving slowly and the CPICH Ec/Nt may approximate the UE's current channel quality. However, as mobility or speed of the UE increases, the CPICH Ec/Nt may be less likely to function as an accurate indicator of the UE's current channel quality. For example, some wireless communication systems have a latency of 9 milliseconds (ms), which means the Node B scheduler is using a value for the CPICH Ec/Nt that is approximately 9 ms older than a current CPICH Ec/Nt. In this example, the conventional measure of the CPICH Ec/Nt may work well for UEs at a velocity less than 10 kilometers per hour (Kmph), but not necessarily for higher velocity UEs.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An example embodiment of the present invention is directed to a method of estimating a current channel condition. The estimating may be based at least in part on a previous channel quality indicator and power control information received after the previous channel quality indicator. In an example, the power control information may include at least one transmit power control (TPC) command.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given herein below and the accompanying drawings which are given by way of illustration only, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various drawings, and wherein:



FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional communication system operating in accordance with Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) protocols.



FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a frame of a UMTS uplink dedicated traffic channel including a high speed dedicated physical control channel (HS-DPCCH).



FIG. 3 illustrates an example slot structure for a given slot of a DPCCH.



FIG. 4 illustrates a given subframe of a HS-DPCCH.



FIG. 5 illustrates a communication diagram of conventional channel quality indicator (CQI) reporting.



FIG. 6 illustrates a communication flow diagram for predicting a current channel quality according to an example embodiment of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXAMPLE EMBODIMENTS OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

In order to better understand the present invention, an example of a conventional uplink frame structure for a UMTS wireless communication system and an example communication flow diagram of a conventional downlink channel quality reporting will be described, followed by descriptions of downlink channel quality prediction according to example embodiments of the present invention.


Conventional UMTS Uplink Frame Structure


FIG. 2 illustrates an example of a frame 200 of a UMTS uplink dedicated traffic channel 250 including a DPDCH 240, a DPCCH 220 and a high speed dedicated physical control channel (HS-DPCCH) 235. Each frame 200 may have a length of, for example, 10 milliseconds (ms) and, for the DPCCH 220, may be partitioned into a plurality of slots 205 (e.g., 15 slots). Each slot 205 may have a length of, for example, 2560 chips, which may correspond to one power-control period, and may have a duration of, for example ⅔ ms. The DPCCH 220 will be described in further detail below with respect to FIG. 3.


Each of the DPCCH 220 and the DPDCH 240 may be code multiplexed. The DPDCH 240 may include information transmitted from a mobile station or user equipment (UE). The HS-DPCCH 225 may include a plurality of subframes 230 within the frame 200. Each subframe 230 in the HS-DPCCH may correspond to a plurality of slots 205 in the DPCCH.



FIG. 3 illustrates an example slot structure for a given slot 205 of the DPCCH 220. Each slot 205 in the frame 200 of the DPCCH 220 may include control information, for example, a pilot signal 221, a transmit power control (TPC) command 222, transport format combination indicator (TFCI) bits 223 and feedback information (FBI) 224.


In an example, each slot 205 may include a total of 10 bits, with a given number of pilot bits (e.g., pilot signal 221) and control bits (e.g., a combination of TPC bits in the TPC command 222, TFCI bits 223 and FBI bits 224). In a further example, each slot 205 may include 10 bits with 5 pilot bits, 2 TFCI bits, 1 FBI bit and 2 TPC bits. However, the number of total bits for each slot 205 as well as the bit composition of each slot 205 (e.g., other numbers of TFCI bits, FBI bits, pilot bits, TPC bits, etc.) may vary and may be controlled by a RNC (e.g., RNC 130, RNC 132, etc.).


The TFCI 223 may inform a Node B of the transport format of information (e.g., voice and/or data packets, frames, etc.) transmitted from a UE.


Each of the UE and the Node B may generate and transmit TPC bits in the TPC command 222 of the uplink DPCCH 220 and the downlink DPCCH (not shown), respectively, to control each others transmit power. When the UE communicates with, for example, a single Node B (e.g., when the UE is not in soft handoff), a single TPC command 222 may be received in each timeslot.


In an example, each slot 205 in the frame 200 may include a TPC command 222 with either 1 or 2 TPC bits. If a given slot 205 includes 2 TPC bits, the values for each of the 2 TPC bits may be identical; namely, the TPC bits in the TPC command 222 are either both “0” or both “1”, given as “00” and “11”, respectively. The TPC bits in the TPC command 222 may be used to adjust the downlink transmit power in order to converge the downlink transmit power to a desired target power. For example, if the TPC bits in the TPC command 222 are “0” or “00”, the downlink transmit power may be decreased. In another example, if the TPC bits in the TPC command 222 are “1” or “11”, the downlink transmit power may be increased.


While FIGS. 2 and 3 illustrate a 3GPP-UMTS uplink frame structure, a 3GPP2-UMTS uplink frame structure may be similar. However, a typical 3GPP2-UMTS uplink frame structure does not include the above-described TFCI 223 and FBI 224.



FIG. 4 illustrates a given subframe 230 of the HS-DPCCH 235. In the example where each frame 200 has a duration of 10 ms, each subframe 230 of the HS-DPCCH 235 may have a duration of 2 ms, which may be equivalent to 3 slots 205 for the DPCCH 220, where each slot 205 has a duration of ⅔ ms. Each subframe 230 may include a hybrid automatic request (HARQ)-acknowledgment (ACK) 410 and a channel quality indicator (CQI) 420. In an example, the HARQ-ACK 410 may be allotted 2560 chips (e.g., corresponding to a first slot 205 of the subframe 230) and the CQI 420 may be allotted 5120 chips (e.g., corresponding to second and third slots 205 of the subframe 230).


The CQI 420 may be reported once for each subframe 230, for example at an end of a given subframe 230 for which the CQI 420 is being reported. Thus, a highest rate that a UE may transmit the CQI 420 to a Node B may be once for every 3 slots 205 (e.g., 2 ms). However, to conserve UE battery power, 3GPP-UMTS standards allow the CQI 420 to be transmitted at a lower rate, for example every 80 subframes 230 or 240 slots 205.


Conventional Downlink Channel Quality Reporting


FIG. 5 illustrates a communication diagram of conventional CQI 420 reporting.


Channel quality at a given UE (e.g., UE 105, 110, etc.) is measured (at S505) in a CQI measurement window. After the channel quality is measured (at S505), the given UE converts the measured channel quality into the CQI 420 and transmits (at S510) the CQI 420 for representing the measured channel quality to a Node B (e.g., Node B 120, 122, 124, etc.). The CQI 420 experiences propagation delay (at S515) during transmission from the UE to the Node B and arrives at the Node B at a later time than it was initially transmitted by the given UE. The Node B receives the CQI 420 (at S520) and transfers the CQI 420 to the Node B scheduler, where the CQI 420 experiences a processing delay (at S525) during the transfer. The Node B scheduler receives the CQI 420 (at S530) and schedules an adjustment to downlink power (e.g., HS-SCCH power and/or selects an MCS for the HS-PDSCH) for transmissions from the Node B to the given UE based on the received CQI 420. The scheduled adjustment to the downlink power may take effect at a next downlink transmission (at S535). A given number of subframes may lapse between the measurement of the channel quality (at step S505) and the scheduled adjustment to the downlink power (at S535), where the given number of subframes numbers at least min_CQI_T and no more than max_CQI_T. In an example, the min_CQI_T may be approximately 9 ms, which may correlate to 4.5 subframes or 13.5 slots. Various factors such as the propagation/processing delays of steps S515 and S525 may affect the min_CQI_T.


The above-described delays in the reporting of the CQI 420 may cause the downlink power to be adjusted based on older and/or inaccurate information at the Node B scheduler, for example in a situation where the channel quality at the UE changes rapidly (e.g., if the UE is moving at a high speed).


Downlink Channel Quality Prediction with TPC Adjustment

An example embodiment of the present invention will now be described where a current channel quality is predicted based on a previous CQI 420 received at the Node B scheduler with a further consideration of TPC commands 222 received at the Node B scheduler after the previous CQI 420. As discussed above, the conventional art uses only the previous CQI 420 as the current channel quality.


As shown in FIG. 3 and discussed above, the TPC commands 222 may include TPC bits with either 1 or 2 bits in each slot 205 of the DPCCH 220. Further, if 2 bits are allotted to the TPC command 222, each of the one or two bits may be either a “0” or a “1”. Thus, for each slot 205 received at the Node B from the given UE in the DPCCH 220, the TPC command 222 may include TPC bits with one of “0”, “00”, “1” and “11”. The Node B may adjust the power of the downlink DPCCH (not shown) and/or the DPDCH (not shown) by a given step size based on the TPC command 222. For example, if the TPC bits in the TPC command 222 are “0” or “00”, the downlink transmit power may be decreased by a given amount or step size. In another example, if the TPC bits in the TPC command 222 are “1” or “11”, the downlink transmit power may be increased by the given amount or step size. For example, the given step size may be one of 0.5 decibels (dB), 1.0 db, 1.5 dB, 2.0 dB, etc. The RNC (e.g., RNC 130, 132, etc.) may select the given step size corresponding to the TPC command 222 for each Node B.



FIG. 6 illustrates a communication flow diagram for predicting a current channel quality according to an example embodiment of the present invention. While FIG. 6 describes communication between the UE 105 and the Node B 120, it is understood that the example described with respect to FIG. 6 is applicable to communication between any Node B or BS and UE or mobile.


In a previous subframe X (not shown) prior to a subframe (X+1), the UE 105 sends a previous CQI 420 to the Node B 120 on the HS-DPCCH 235. At a first slot 205 at the start of the subframe (X+1), the UE 105 sends a first TPC command TPC(1) to the Node B 120 on the DPCCH 220. At a second slot 205 of the subframe (X+1), the UE 105 sends a second TPC command TPC(2) to the Node B 120. At a third slot 205 of the subframe (X+1), the UE 105 sends a third TPC command TPC(3) to the Node B 120. In step S604, the Node B estimates a current channel quality using the previous CQI 420 and the later received TPC commands TPC(1), TPC(2) and TPC(3), as will be described in further detail later with reference to Equation 1.


The above-described process may continue for any number of slots or subframes, with a latest received CQI replacing the previous CQI 420 with regard to the estimating of the current channel quality. The Node B scheduler may schedule an adjustment to the downlink power based on the estimated current channel quality.


An example method of generating a current channel quality estimate (CCQE) or current CPICH_Ec/Nt, based on a previous CQI 420 and later received TPC commands (e.g., TPC(1), TPC(2), TPC(3), etc.) may be given by:









CCQE
=


Previous_CPICH


_Ec
/
Nt


+




n
=
1

Y





[

1
-

2
·

TPC


(
n
)




]

·
TPC_step


_size


(
n
)








Equation





1







where the Previous_CPICH_Ec/Nt is the previous CQI 420 measured at subframe X, TPC_step_size(n) refers to the amount of downlink power adjustment based on the TPC(n), where the TPC(n) is the binary power control command which may have a value of “0” or “1”, correlating to its actual digital representation, and a value n indicates a number of slots after the previous CQI 420 in the process of FIG. 6.


In Equation 1, the summation begins at (n=1) and continues until a value Y, where Y is a natural number indicating a given number of slots 205. In an example, Y may be min_CQI_T. In another example, Y may be larger than the min_CQI_T. In this example, Y may be equal to, for example, (min_CQI_T+k+1), where k may be a natural number in a range [0, K−1], where K is the number of slots 205 between two successive CQI reports.


In another example embodiment of the present invention, the Node B scheduler may determine whether to use the power control information in estimating the current channel quality based on at least one of a communication status of a mobile station and a channel indicator. For example, if a mobile station is engaged in a soft handoff with multiple base stations or Node Bs, the Node B scheduler may further validate the TPC command 222 because the mobile station may be leaving the coverage area of the Node B. In this example, an additional metric, such as a channel indicator, may be used to determine whether to consider the TPC command 222 for the current channel quality estimation. In an example, the channel indicator may be an uplink DPCCH channel quality. Based on an analysis of the communication status of the mobile station and the additional metrics, if a Node B scheduler decides to ignore the TPC command 222 for the estimating of the current channel quality, the previous CQI 420 without a TPC adjustment may be used as the current channel quality.


While above-described example embodiments are directed to adjusting downlink transmission power based on power control information (e.g., TPC command 222) received after the previous CQI 420, other example embodiments of the present invention may adjust any downlink transmission parameter based on the power control information. In an example, the downlink transmission parameter may be a data encoding parameter. In this example, the adjustment step (e.g., represented above in Equation 1 with respect to downlink power) may increase or decrease the level of encoding on the HS-DSCH and/or the HS-PDSCH. In a further example, the encoding may be error encoding and the adjustment step may increase or decrease a level of cyclic redundancy check (CRC) bits in downlink data transmissions.


The example embodiments of the present invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. For example, while example embodiments of the present invention have been described with respect to 3GPP-UMTS, it is understood that other example embodiments of the present invention may employ other UMTS protocols, CDMA2000 protocols, and/or any other well-known wireless communication protocol. It is further understood that while above-described example embodiments use power control information include at least one TPC command 222, other example embodiments of the present invention may employ other types of power control information (e.g., in other protocols) indicative of changes to downlink power.


Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the exemplary embodiments of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of the invention.

Claims
  • 1. A method of estimating a current channel condition, comprising: receiving, at a network element, a first channel quality indicator; andgenerating, at the network element, a current channel quality estimate based on the first channel quality indicator and a summation of power control information, the power control information included in the summation being only power control information that is received over at least two transmission power control intervals, the at least two transmission power control intervals occurring between receipt of the first channel quality indicator and receipt of a next channel quality indicator.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the power control information indicates whether to increase or decrease a transmission power.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the increase or decrease to the transmission power is based on a given increment amount.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the power control information includes at least one transmit power control bit.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, wherein the increase or decrease to the transmission power is based on a given increment amount.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, further comprising: adjusting a downlink transmission parameter on a downlink channel based on the generated current channel quality estimate.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the downlink transmission parameter includes a downlink transmission power and the adjusting step increases or decreases the downlink transmission power on the downlink channel.
  • 8. The method of claim 6, wherein the downlink transmission parameter includes a data encoding parameter and the adjustment step increases or decreases the level of encoding on the downlink channel.
  • 9. The method of claim 6, wherein the downlink channel includes at least one of a High Speed Downlink Shared Channel and a High Speed Physical Downlink Shared Channel.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the current channel quality indicator is received on an uplink channel.
  • 11. The method of claim 10, wherein the uplink channel is a High Speed Dedicated Physical Control Channel in accordance with 3GPP-UMTS.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the power control information is received on an uplink channel.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the uplink channel is a Dedicated Physical Control Channel.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein said summation over at least two transmission power control intervals includes summation, for a given interval, in respect to a product of a given transmission power control command and a corresponding downlink power adjustment factor for the given power control command.
US Referenced Citations (136)
Number Name Date Kind
5842113 Nanda et al. Nov 1998 A
5982760 Chen Nov 1999 A
6058107 Love et al. May 2000 A
6259927 Butovitsch et al. Jul 2001 B1
6584086 Shim et al. Jun 2003 B1
6597894 Ue et al. Jul 2003 B1
6618375 Rezaiifar et al. Sep 2003 B2
6654613 Maeng et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658050 Ramesh et al. Dec 2003 B1
6754506 Chang et al. Jun 2004 B2
6760567 Jeong et al. Jul 2004 B1
6778511 Magnus et al. Aug 2004 B1
6807164 Almgren et al. Oct 2004 B1
6823193 Persson et al. Nov 2004 B1
6912228 Dahlman et al. Jun 2005 B1
6952591 Budka et al. Oct 2005 B2
6970438 Mate et al. Nov 2005 B2
7013143 Love et al. Mar 2006 B2
7043244 Fauconnier May 2006 B1
7054633 Seo et al. May 2006 B2
7075969 Zeira et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079859 Nobukiyo et al. Jul 2006 B2
7085254 Yun et al. Aug 2006 B1
7116944 Das et al. Oct 2006 B2
7200127 Lee et al. Apr 2007 B1
7206596 Nishio Apr 2007 B2
7209712 Holtzman Apr 2007 B2
7236474 Seo et al. Jun 2007 B2
7245598 Puig-Oses et al. Jul 2007 B2
7280837 Guan et al. Oct 2007 B2
7292552 Willenegger et al. Nov 2007 B2
7310499 Magnusson et al. Dec 2007 B2
7313409 Iacono et al. Dec 2007 B2
7317702 Dominique et al. Jan 2008 B2
7321780 Love et al. Jan 2008 B2
7324828 Nagaoka et al. Jan 2008 B2
7333457 Gopalakrishnan et al. Feb 2008 B2
7333546 Kim et al. Feb 2008 B2
7340268 Oh et al. Mar 2008 B2
7346034 Takano et al. Mar 2008 B2
7352722 Malladi et al. Apr 2008 B2
7356022 Takano et al. Apr 2008 B2
7366230 Jonsson Apr 2008 B2
7372836 Hwang et al. May 2008 B2
7386321 Miyoshi et al. Jun 2008 B2
7403745 Dominique et al. Jul 2008 B2
7403791 Oki et al. Jul 2008 B2
7406065 Willenegger et al. Jul 2008 B2
7406070 Nilsson Jul 2008 B2
7436794 Takahashi et al. Oct 2008 B2
7444169 Ishii et al. Oct 2008 B2
7606591 Itoh et al. Oct 2009 B2
7630692 Itoh et al. Dec 2009 B2
7724813 Wang et al. May 2010 B2
7769038 Hamilton et al. Aug 2010 B2
7916681 Andersson et al. Mar 2011 B2
7983620 Itoh et al. Jul 2011 B2
8060127 Anderson Nov 2011 B2
8249044 Onodera et al. Aug 2012 B2
8351975 Anderson Jan 2013 B2
8521212 Anderson Aug 2013 B2
8688049 Simonsson et al. Apr 2014 B2
8712464 Andersson et al. Apr 2014 B2
20020123351 Miyoshi et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020141331 Mate et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020160801 Uesugi Oct 2002 A1
20030086385 Kwon et al. May 2003 A1
20030095532 Kim et al. May 2003 A1
20030100267 Itoh et al. May 2003 A1
20030109274 Budka et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030119452 Kim et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030123396 Seo et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030148738 Das et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030148770 Das et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030210668 Malladi et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030232622 Seo et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040057394 Holtzman Mar 2004 A1
20040125766 Takano et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040142698 Pietraski Jul 2004 A1
20040171387 Miyoshi et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050043051 Takano et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050047387 Frederiksen et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050047393 Liu Mar 2005 A1
20050048920 Liu Mar 2005 A1
20050068921 Liu Mar 2005 A1
20050068990 Liu Mar 2005 A1
20050083869 Takahashi et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050085255 Andersson et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050111391 Oki et al. May 2005 A1
20050143112 Jonsson Jun 2005 A1
20050180450 Gaal et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050197149 Iacono et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050201499 Jonsson Sep 2005 A1
20050208961 Willenegger Sep 2005 A1
20050220052 Uehara et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050239467 Nishio Oct 2005 A1
20050250510 Kaikkonen et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050277419 Takano et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060007889 Khan Jan 2006 A1
20060014542 Khandekar et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060046738 Guan et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060068825 Iochi Mar 2006 A1
20060072567 Casaccia et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060092869 Herrmann May 2006 A1
20060099985 Whinnett et al. May 2006 A1
20060105719 Itoh et al. May 2006 A1
20060116118 Charriere et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060121856 Itoh et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060135080 Khandekar et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060142040 Jones Jun 2006 A1
20060205358 Itoh et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060209970 Kanterakis Sep 2006 A1
20060217088 Nagaoka et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060233222 Reial et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060240859 Gervais et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060246937 Lindoff Nov 2006 A1
20060262754 Andersson et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060262840 Wang et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060270432 Dominique et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274679 Khandekar et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070032196 Dominique et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070076641 Bachl et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070133479 Montojo et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070149201 Dominique et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070189199 Nishio Aug 2007 A1
20070230324 Li et al. Oct 2007 A1
20070281728 Charriere et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070287487 Puig-Oses et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080004033 Tiedemann et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080037450 Itoh et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080039145 Ishii et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080123601 Malladi et al. May 2008 A1
20080200201 Jonsson Aug 2008 A1
20090011771 Takahashi et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090124211 Itoh et al. May 2009 A1
20110111790 Andersson et al. May 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
2002-152228 May 2002 JP
2003-143654 May 2003 JP
2004-215104 Jul 2004 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Toskala et al., “High-speed Downlink Packet Access”, 2002, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., pp. 279-304.
Kolding et al. “Performance Aspects of WCDMA Systems with High Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA)”, 2002 IEEE, pp. 477-481.
3GPP TS 25.214, 3rd Generation Partnership Project: Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical layer procedures (FDD), 3GPP, release 5, 56 pages.
PCT International Search Report dated Sep. 14, 2006.
Korean Preliminary Rejection for corresponding patent application No. 10-2007-7027919 mailed May 25, 2012 with English translation.
Office Action for corresponding Japanese patent application No. 2008-514662 mailed Oct. 3, 2011 with English translation.
Office Action for corresponding Chinese patent application No. 200680019030.0 mailed Mar. 6, 2012 with English translation.
Board Opinion issued by the Patent Reexamination Board dated Apr. 29, 2014, issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200680019030.0, with English translation.
Board Opinion issued by the Patent Reeaxarnination Board dated Sep. 28, 2014, issued in Chinese Patent Application No. 200680019030.0, with English translation.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060270432 A1 Nov 2006 US