Method of executing a job

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • RE37496
  • Patent Number
    RE37,496
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, June 20, 1996
    28 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 1, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A job processing method is provided for use in an information processing system including three or more information processing devices connected to a common transmission line:(a) first of all, in case the occurrence of a job is detected at one of the three or more processing devices, it is broadcast to the remaining plural processing device;(b) next, that job execution for that job is started at a first processing device which is one of the plural processing devices receiving the job occurrence broadcast or the processing device having broadcast the job occurrence;(c) then, the first processing device having started that job execution is monitored at the others of the plural processing devices which are not presently involved in that job execution but have been informed of that job occurrence; and(d) the job is executed irrespective of the presence of an abnormal processing device in case a second processing device, which is one of the plural monitoring processing devices, detects an abnormality of the processing device executing that job.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The present invention relates to a job processing method for an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices connected to a common transmission line. More specifically, the present invention relates to a job processing method for executing a job in a reliable manner, even if an abnormality occurs in the processing device executing the job, by use of the remaining processing devices.




2. Description of the Prior Art




In the case where a job request has occurred in an information processing system including a plurality of information processing devices, that job has been executed according to the prior art in the following different ways:




(1) the job is executed by the processing device which has detected the job request occurrence; or




(2) that processing device which detects the job request demands that another processing device perform the execution of that job so that the job may be executed by the other processing device.




In the aforementioned case (1), there arises a disadvantage in that the job is not executed if the processing device having detected the job request becomes abnormal and is disabled.




In the aforementioned case (2), the first processing device having referred the job execution to a second processing device keeps monitoring the second processing device to which the job has been referred. Therefore, when the second processing device having the task of executing the job becomes disabled, the first processing device can detect that disorder so that the job can be assigned another processing device for execution. However, there arises a disadvantage in that the job cannot be executed when both the first and second processing devices becomes disabled at the same time.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention has been conceived to eliminate the disadvantages concomitant with the prior art thus far described and has an object to provide a job processing device for an information processing system, in which, even if an abnormality occurs in either the processing device which has detected the occurrence of a job request or a processing device to which the job execution has been referred by the former device, that job can be executed by means of the remaining processing devices.




According to the present invention, there is provided a job processing method for use in an information processing system including three or more information processing devices connected with a common transmission line:




(a) First of all, in the case where the occurrence of a job request is detected at one of the three or more processing devices, this condition is broadcast on the transmission line to the remaining plural processing devices;




(b) Next, job execution is started at a first processing device which is any one of the plural processing devices informed of the job request occurrence or the processing device having broadcast the job request occurrence;




(c) Then, the first processing device having started that job execution is monitored by the others of the plural processing devices which are not presently involved in that job execution, but have been informed of that job request occurrence; and




(d) The job is executed irrespective of the presence of an abnormal processing device in case a second processing device, which is one of the plural monitoring processing devices, detects an abnormality of the processing device executing that job.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a block diagram showing the overall construction of a loop transmission system to which the present invention is applied;





FIG. 2

is a block diagram showing one embodiment of an information processing device according to the present invention;





FIG. 3

is a schematic diagram showing the construction of one example of a storage unit in the transmission controller of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 4

is a schematic diagram showing the construction of one example of a storage unit in the information processor of

FIG. 2

;





FIG. 5

is a schematic diagram showing the construction of one example of a job occurrence message according to the present invention;





FIG. 6

is a flow chart showing one example of the message receiving process of the transmission controller of

FIG. 2

;




FIGS.


7


(A) to (E) are flow charts showing one example of the processes of the processing units of the information processor of

FIG. 2

; and





FIGS. 8

to


12


are schematic diagrams showing respective examples of candidacy, job execution declaration, job executing, job completion and abnormal broadcast messages according to the present invention.











DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




The present invention will now be described in detail by way of an example of an information processing system using a loop transmission.

FIG. 1

shows the overall construction of that system. In

FIG. 1

, reference numeral


1


indicates a uni-directional loop transmission line acting as a common transmission line, in which three or more information processors having an identical construction are coupled. The construction of an ith information processor


1


i is shown in

FIG. 2

by way of an example. Each information processor is composed of a transmission controller


20


, an information processor


30


and a plurality of I/O devices


40


.




Next, the operations will be described in the order of the following items:




(1) Detection of Job Occurrence Request and Transmission of Job Occurrence Message;




(2) Reception of Job Occurrence Message at other Processors;




(3) Execution of Job;




(4) Monitor of Job Execution; and




(5) Abnormal Detection and Processings therefor.




(1) Detection of Job Occurrence Request and Transmission of Job Occurrence Message




The following description is directed by way of an example to the case in which, when trouble occurs in a signal device for trains, its cause is automatically analyzed so that a maintenance man is informed of the problem of . Let it be assumed that the trouble in a certain signal device (although not shown) is detected by one of the plural I/O devices


40


of a processor


11


. Then, this I/O device sends code data SAB indicative of the trouble in the signal device, number data SNO identifying the signal device, and data SDA concerning the signal device to the information processor


30


. A processing unit


32


in that information processor


30


detects, when it receives the data SAB, SNO and SDA through an interface


33


, that a job to be processed has been requested. The processing unit


32


partly stores this data SAB, SNO and SDA in a job occurrence message storage area


342


of a storage unit


34


as is shown in FIG.


4


and partly sends this data to transmission controller


20


.




The construction of a storage unit


24


in the transmission controller


20


is shown in

FIG. 3. A

processing unit


22


in the transmission controller


20


reads out, when it receives the data SAB, SNO and SDA through an interface


23


, both the device address data “11”, which is stored in a device address storage area


241


of the storage unit


24


, and the message sequence number data “0” which is stored in a message sequence number storage area


242


, which is set at “0” at this point because it is assumed that no message M has been sent as yet from that information processor


11


. And, a sending buffer area


244


is set with a job occurrence message Jm, having a format as shown in FIG.


5


. Reference letters F appearing in areas


51


and


57


of the message Jm designate flags indicative of the leading and trailing portions of the message. An area


52


is set with code data CD


1


indicating that the message is a job occurrence message (other types of code data indicate other types of messages). An area


53


is one which is to be set with a sender address SA and is set in this case with the address “11” of the aforementioned processor


11


as the address SA. An area


54


is to be set with a message sequence number DN and is set in this case with the summed value “1” of the previous sequence number “0” and an incremented valve “1”. At this time, the value of the message sequence number storage area


242


is counted up only one for the subsequent message sent. An area


55


is to be set with a content code CC (which will be detailed later) and is set in this case with the code data SAB obtained from the I/O device


40


which has detected the trouble in the signal device and which identifies the aforementioned trouble of the signal device. An area


56


is one which is to be set with sub-data SD (which will be detailed later) and is set in this case with both the number SNO of the aforementioned troubled signal device and the data SDA concerning that signal device.




The processing unit


22


sends a copy of the job occurrence message Jm, which has been stored in the sending buffer area


244


, to the transmission loop


1


through an interface


21


.




Thus, the job occurrence message JM sent from the information processor


11


circulates once through information processors


12


,


13


, - - - , and


1


n until it returns to the information processor


11


.

FIG. 6

shows one example of the message receiving process at the processing unit


22


of the transmission controller


20


. On the other hand, FIGS.


7


(A) to (E) show a variety of processing examples at the processing unit


32


of the information processor


11


. The operations of the information processor according to the present invention will be described in the following with reference to those Figures. The processing unit


22


in the information processor


11


starts, when it receives that message JM through the interface


21


(at a process


701


of

FIG. 4

) and detects the sender address SA and the sequence number DN, which are in a predetermined positional relationship from the start flag F. The sender address SA and the address stored in the device address storage area


241


of the information processor


11


are compared (at a process


702


of FIG.


6


). In this case, they are coincident. Therefore, it is possible to detect that the message JM is one which has been sent from the processor


11


. Since that message JM is a self-sent again one, it need not be sent so that it is prevented from being sent from the processor


11


to the processor


12


(at a process


707


of FIG.


6


). In other words, that message JM is taken out of the loop transmission line


1


. Next, it is determined whether a message having the same sequence number is stored in the sending buffer area


244


. In this case, the area


244


stores the same job occurrence message JM as that received so that the sequence numbers of the messages received and stored are coincident. Therefore, the coincident message stored in the area


244


is unnecessary and is deleted, because it is judged at this point that that message JM has been transmitted successfully to the respective devices in the system (at a process


708


of FIG.


6


).




However, when a message which is stored in the sending buffer area


244


is not deleted from that area


244


after a predetermined period has elapsed after the message sending operation from that area


244


, the processing unit


22


judges that the message has been sent out once but has not returned, and therefore sends it again.




The sending process of the job occurrence message is completed in the manner thus far described.




Incidentally, the sequence number DN is used to discriminate the messages having a common information processor as their sender. More specifically, in case a plurality of messages having a common information processor as their sender are sent, the sequence number DN is used to judge which message circulates once but fails to return.




The aforementioned content code CC indicates the content of the general concept expressed by the data and is used to classify the data according to type, and therefore, it has a limited number of different combinations.




In contrast, the aforementioned sub-data SD concerns the content code and the so-called “variable parameter” or the like for specifically supplementing the concept of the content code with numerical values or the like thereby to provide control data associated with the content code so that the content to be designated thereby is substantially infinite.




In a system relating to trains, for example, the items of Table 1 are some examples of the content code and the subdata:














TABLE 1









Content of Control Data




Content Code




Sub-Data











The work begins at 4:30.




Beginning Code




Data of 4:30






The work ends at 23:50.




Ending Code




Data of 23:50






The train M5 was troubled at the




Trouble Code




Data of Station






station F at 12:00.





F, Train M5








& 12:00






The train M10 left the station G




Pursuit Code




Data of Station






at 12:30.





G, Train M10








& 12:30






The signal device 90 is abnormal,




Signal Device




Signal Device






and the data for its analysis are SDA.




Abnormal Code




90 (SNO) &







(SDA)




Data (SDA)


















































































(2) Reception of Job Occurrence Message at Other Processors




Next, the reception at the other processors of the job occurrence message sent from the processor


11


in the aforementioned manner will be described in the following. The transmission controller


20


of each of the processors


12


,


13


,


14


, - - - , and


1


n, which are not the senders of that message, first judges, when it receives that job occurrence message JM (at the process


701


of FIG.


6


), whether or not it is a self-sent message (at the process


702


of FIG.


6


). More specifically, the processing unit


22


in the transmission controller


20


receives that message JM (which has a construction such as shown in

FIG. 5

) through the interface


21


. The sender address SA of the area


53


, which is arranged at a predetermined position with respect to the position of the flag F of the start area


51


of that message, is detected and compared with the device address which is stored in the area


241


of the storage unit


24


. In this case, no coincidence takes place, so that the message JM is transferred to the transmission loop


1


. It is judged (simultaneously with a process


703


of

FIG. 6

) whether or not there is coincidence in a receiving buffer area


243


between that message JM and the sender address SA and sequence number DN of the transmission loop


1


(at a process


704


of FIG.


6


). In this case, there is no storage of this message in the area


243


, and it is judged that no coincidence takes place. In other words, it is found that the message JM represents the first reception of that message at this processor. Next, in accordance with whether or not the content code of that message JM is registered in a content code table storage area


245


, it is judged whether or not that message JM is to be processed somehow by the processor itself (at a process


705


of FIG.


6


). The area


245


of each of the processors stores in advance a plurality of content codes identifying those jobs to be processed by the respective processors. Now, let it be assumed that the same content code as the code data SAD indicative of the abnormality in the signal device, i.e., the content code of that message JM, is registered in the areas


245


of those processors


12


,


13


and


14


of the processors


12


,


13


, - - - , and


1


n, but not in the areas of the remaining processors.




In this case, the execution of the job is limited to the processors


12


,


13


and


14


in which the results of the judging process


705


is YES. Therefore, that message JM is stored only in the receiving buffer areas


243


of the processors


12


,


13


and


14


(at a process


706


of FIG.


6


). The result is that the remaining processors do not store that message JM.




In the manners thus far described, the job occurrence message JM is received by the plural information processors.




Next, at each of the information processors which have received and stored that message JM, a judging process is performed for judging whether or not the job relating to the message JM is to be executed by the processor itself or whether or not the execution of that job simply is to be monitored by that processor. That judging process is performed in the following way.




The processing units


22


in each of the processors


12


,


13


and


14


inform the processing unit


32


therein of the fact that there is in the receiving buffer area


243


a message which has not been read yet. The processing unit


32


, when it receives that information, sets an interrupt flag ORF to “1”, if it is involved in a job execution, thereby to interrupt the job being executed. If it is not involved in job execution, the processing unit


32


leaves the interrupt flag ORF at “0”. The processing unit


32


first commands the processing unit


22


to read that message JM out of the receiving buffer area


243


(at a process


801


of FIG.


7


(A)). Then, the processing unit


22


reads that message JM out of the area


243


, transfers the same to the processing unit


32


and deletes part of the message JM from the area


243


. In this regard, the sender address SA and the sequence number DN of that message JM are held in the area


243


for a predetermined time so that they may be used to prevent the same message JM from being received twice or more, after which this data is also deleted.




The processing unit


32


detects that the code data of that message JM is CD and judges that the message JM is a job occurrence message (at a process


803


). Next, the job occurrence message is stored into the job occurrence message storage area


342


(at a process


807


).




Here, it is desirable that the newly occurring job be executed by the information processor having the least load. In the embodiment being described by way of example, a relative time RT from the instant when the job occurrence message is received at each processor to the instant when the processor is available for executing that job is used as an index for indicating the load condition of the processor. When the information processor receives the job occurrence message during the execution of another job, it becomes available for executing the job of that message after it has executed that other job. When the information processor receives that message while it is doing no job, on the other hand, it instantly becomes available. Therefore, the processor has less load if it has a shorter relative time RT before it becomes available. The processes of calculating that relative time RT are performed at steps


807


to


813


in the following manner.




It is judged whether or not the aforementioned interrupt flag ORF is “1” (at the process


807


). When the flag ORF is “0”, there is no job being executed so that the newly occurring job of the received message can be instantly executed, and a buffer area


345


is partially set to be “0” as the relative time RT in such a processor (at the process


808


). When the flag ORF is “1”, there is a job to be interrupted, and the start is effected, after a set timer


104


for setting the relative time RT, as shown in

FIG. 2

, has been set to be “0”, so that the time RT before the job is completed may be measured (at the process


809


). Next, the interrupt flag ORF is reset to be “0” (at the process


810


), and the execution of the interrupted job is restarted (at the process


811


). After the execution of the interrupted job has been completed (at the process


812


), the value of the timer


104


at that time is set as the relative time RT in a portion of the buffer area


345


(at the process


813


).




Next, the generation of a random variable is executed to generate a random variable RV, which is set in a portion of the buffer area


345


. Then, this buffer area


345


is set with a candidacy code CD


2


(which identifies a message as a candidacy message), the content code CC (which is the code SAB indicating the abnormality of the signal device) of the job occurrence message stored in the area


342


, and a code PSDA (which is the number SNO of the abnormal signal device, in this case) forming a part of the sub-data SD. Incidentally, combination of the content code CC and the code PSDA will be referred to as a “job code”. The processing unit


32


sends the candidacy code CD


2


, the job code TN, the relative time RT and the random variable RV, that have been set in the buffer area


345


in the manner described, to the transmission controller


20


(at a process


814


).




The processing unit


22


of the transmission controller


20


thus having received that data sets a candidacy message CM shown in

FIG. 8

in the sending buffer area


244


similarly to the aforementioned case in which the job occurrence message JM is formed. The areas


51


and


57


of that message CM are set with the flags indicating the starting and ending portions of the message. The area


52


is set with the received code data CD


2


indicative of the candidacy message CM. The area


53


is set with the sender address SA. The area


54


is set with the sequence number DN. The area


55


is set with the content code CC. An area


561


is set with the code PSDA. An area


58


is set with the relative time RT. An area


59


is set with the random variable RV.




The processing unit


22


sends a copy of the candidacy message CM stored in the sending buffer area


244


to the transmission line


1


and takes that copy out of the transmission line


1


similarly to the case of the job occurrence message JM if the copy circulates once and returns. Incidentally, in the case of the job occurrence message JM, the same job occurrence message JM as the copy having once circulated and returned is merely erased from the sending buffer area


244


. In the case of the candidacy message CM, however, the same message CM as the copy having once circulated and returned is additionally transferred to the receiving buffer area


243


immediately before it is deleted from the area


244


.




Thus, the candidacy message CM is sent to the transmission line


1


from the plural processors


12


,


13


and


14


which have received the job occurrence message JM.




In the manner thus far described, the candidacy message CM having been sent to the transmission line


1


is stored, irrespective of whether or not it is a self-transmitted message, in the receiving buffer areas


243


of the processors


11


,


12


,


13


and


14


in which the same content code as the content code CC of that message CM is in the content code table storage area


245


.




The following processes are performed in the processors


11


,


12


,


13


and


14


, respectively. Specifically, the processing unit


32


is informed similarly to the foregoing description by the processing unit


22


of the fact that the message has arrived at the receiving buffer area


243


. If the processing unit


32


is executing another job when it receives that information, it sets the interrupt flag ORF to be “1”. Otherwise, the processing unit


32


leaves the interrupt flag ORF at “0” (which will be merely called an “interrupting process”). The processing unit


32


reads that message out of the receiving buffer area


243


(at the process


801


). Next, it is judged whether or not that message is a job occurrence message (at the process


803


). The code of the area


52


of that message is CD


2


and is different from the code CD


1


indicative of a job occurrence message JM so that the process is advanced to step


821


of FIG.


7


(B). Here, it is judged that the code of the area


52


of that message is CD


2


indicative of the candidacy message CM (at the process


821


of FIG.


7


(B)), and this message CM is stored into a candidacy message storage area


343


(at a process


823


).




When the candidacy message CM is the first such message received, a checking timer


105


for closing the candidacy, as shown in

FIG. 2

, is set to the initial state “0”. Therefore, whether or not the candidacy message CM is the first such message received is judged in accordance with whether or not the timer


105


is “0” (at a process


825


). In this regard, it will be recalled that each processor cable of candidacy will transmit a candidacy message. In case it is the first reception of such message, the candidacy closing timer


105


is started (at a process


827


). In case it is not the first reception of such message, the start of the timer


105


is unnecessary so that the process is shifted without any execution of the process


827


to the interrupt releasing process composed of processes


829


and


831


. If the interrupt flag ORF is “0” (at the process


829


), more specifically, there is no job to be executed, the process ends. If the flag ORF is “1”, the interrupt flag is reset to be “0” to execute the interrupted job, and the process ends after the completion of that job (at the process


831


).




If the timer value of the candidacy checking timer


105


reaches a predetermined time T


1


which is slightly longer than that for the candidacy message CM to once circulate the loop, the time-up signal is fed to the processing unit


32


and is left at the value T


1


. The processing unit


32


is informed by the time-up signal of the fact that the candidacy is closed, and performs the aforementioned interrupting process. Next, the candidacy message of the area


343


is examined to select the processor to execute the job (at a process


833


of FIG. (C)). In case there is only one message CM in the area


343


, the processor which is indicated by the address SA of that message CM is selected. In case there are a plurality of messages CM in the area


343


, the message having the shortest relative time RT is selected from the respective messages CM. If there is one message CM having the shortest time, the processor indicated by the address SA of that message CM is selected. If there are two or more messages CM having the same shortest time, the random variables RV of that message are compared to select the message CM having the smallest random variable RV. If two or more messages CM having the same shortest time and random variable are found, their addresses SA are compared to select the message CM having the smallest address SA and to select the processor indicated by the address SA of that message.




At these processes, incidentally, in case where two or more messages CM are found in which both the relative times RT and the random variables RV are the same minimum values, that selecting process


833


may be executed again after new random variables RV are generated at the respective processors indicated by the addresses SA of those messages CM and after the candidacy messages having their random variables RV renewed are newly sent from the respective processors. Thus, the address SA of the single processor selected is stored as the address JA in the area


344


.




It is judged whether or not the single processor thus selected is the processor itself (at a process


835


). More specifically, it is judged whether or not the sender address SA of the single message selected at the process


833


coincides with the address of the area


241


itself. The result is that the job of the message CM is executed by the processor itself, if the coincidence takes place, and is monitored unless otherwise controlled.




Now, let it be assumed that the job identified in the candidacy message CM is executed by the processor


12


so that the job execution is monitored by the processors


11


,


13


and


14


.




(3) Execution of Job




At the processor


12


, the process is shifted from


835


to


837


. The processing unit


32


of the processor


12


sends both a job execution declaration code CD


3


and a job code TN to be executed to the transmission controller


20


. The latter job code TN is a copy of the job code of the message CM in the area


343


, which is solely selected at the process


833


.




The transmission controller


20


thus having received the codes CD


3


and TN executes the processings similar to the aforementioned ones to set into the sending buffer area


244


a job execution declaration message DCM which is shown in FIG.


9


. The transmission controller


20


then sends the copy of that message DCM to the loop transmission line


1


and deletes the message DCM from the sending buffer area


244


after the message DCM has once circulated through that transmission line


1


and returned. Thus, the sending operation of the job execution declaration message DCM ends.




The processing unit


32


reads the content code CC of the job occurrence message JM out of the area


342


. In accordance with the content code CC thus read out, one program is selected from those which are stored in plural in advance in an area


341


. In case a signal device becomes abnormal, a signal device abnormality analyzing program is selected because the content code is the signal device abnormality code SAB. Then, the execution of the job for analyzing the data SDA of that message JM with that selected analyzing program is started. The processing unit


32


, while executing that job, sends a job executing message BM, as shown in

FIG. 10

, through the transmission controller


20


for a predetermined period T


0


similarly to the aforementioned process. That message BM has its code CD


4


indicating the job executing message.




After completion of the execution of that job, the processing unit


32


stores a code CD


5


indicative of the job completion, the code TN of that job and data D indicative of the result of the job execution into the buffer area


345


. Then, those job codes and the data D indicating the result of the job execution are transmitted to the I/O device


40


via interface


33


so that they are displayed (at a process


839


). In the case of the abnormal signal device, the I/O device


40


for informing the signal maintenance man responds to the job code TN to display the number of the signal devices which is abnormal together with the state thereof, the cause for the abnormality and so on in response to the result data D.




Then, the codes CD


5


and TN and the result data D of the buffer area


345


are sent to the transmission controller


20


. This transmission controller


20


sets a job completion message EM, as shown in

FIG. 11

, in the sending buffer area


244


and sends the copy of that message EM to the loop transmission line


1


, both similarly to the aforementioned process, until it deletes that message EM from the sending buffer area if that copy once circulates and returns. The processing unit


32


clears the areas


341


to


345


to zero and resets the timers


104


to


107


to be “0”, thus leading to the end state (at the process


841


).




Incidentally, since the interrupt flag ORF for the job execution is “0”, there is no necessity for the resetting operation after the end of a process


841


.




(4) Monitor of Job Execution




At the processors


11


,


13


and


14


, the process is shifted from


835


to


836


. In the step


835


, the processors


11


,


13


and


14


have determined that they are not selected to execute the job, and in this case, the timer


106


therein is reset and started for monitoring whether or not the job execution declaration message DCM is normally sent by the selected processor


12


. After that, the interrupt releasing processes (i.e., the processes


829


and


831


of FIG.


7


(B)) are executed.




The processor (e.g., the processor


12


in this case) for the job execution is monitored in accordance with whether or not the timer


106


is timed out (which will be described in detail hereinafter). In other words, whether or not the job execution declaration was normally effected.




In case the processor


12


is normal, the job execution declaration message DCM of

FIG. 9

is sent from the processor


12


and is received by the processors


11


,


13


and


14


similarly to the foregoing description. At each of the processors


11


,


13


and


14


, the processing unit


32


executes the aforementioned interrupting process and then the processes


801


and


803


of FIG.


7


(A) and the process


821


of FIG.


7


(B) are performed, after which the operation is shifted to a process


851


of FIG.


7


(D). In accordance with the fact that the code of the area


52


of that message DCM is CD


3


, it is judged that the message DCM is the job execution declaration message, and the process is advanced to


852


. At the time when the process is advanced to


852


, the timer


106


has not timed out yet. The timer


106


is stopped, and then the timer


107


for monitoring whether or not the job is being normally executed at the processor


12


is set to be “0”. After that, the aforementioned interrupt releasing process is executed.




The job executing processor


12


is monitored in accordance with whether or not the timer


107


is timed out (which will be described in detail hereinafter). Specifically, whether or not the job is being normally executed.




In case the processor


12


is normal, the message BM of the job execution shown in

FIG. 10

is sent and received by the processors


11


,


13


and


14


, as has been described hereinbefore. At each of the processors


11


,


13


and


14


, the processing unit


32


executes the aforementioned interrupting process and then the processes


801


and


803


of FIG.


7


(A), the process


821


of FIG.


7


(B) and the process


851


of FIG.


7


(D) are performed, after which the operation is shifted to a process


853


. In accordance with the fact that the code of the area


52


of that message BM is CD


4


, it is judged that the message BM is the job executing message, and the process is advanced to


854


. At the time when the process is advanced to


854


, the timer


107


has not timed out yet. The timer


107


is reset to be “0”. After that, the aforementioned interrupt releasing process is executed. Thus, while the job is being executed at the processor


12


, the timer


107


is repeatedly rest to be “0” and started.




In case the processor


12


is normal, as has been described hereinbefore, the job completion message EM of

FIG. 11

is sent and received by the processors


11


,


13


and


14


. At each of the processors


11


,


13


and


14


, the processing unit


32


consecutively executes the processes


801


and


803


of FIG.


7


(A), the process


821


of FIG.


7


(B) and the processes


851


and


853


of FIG.


7


(D)), after the aforementioned interrupt releasing process has been executed, until it is shifted to a process


856


. In accordance with the fact that the code of the area


52


of that message EM is CD


5


, it is judged that the message EM is the job completion message, and the process is advanced to


857


. At the time when the process is advanced to


857


, the timer


107


is not timed out yet. This timer


107


is stopped and that message EM is stored in the buffer area


345


. The job code TN of that message EM and the result data D are read out of the area


345


and are sent to the I/O device


40


. In case the signal device is abnormal, the I/O device


40


for informing the signal maintenance man displays the number of the signal device which is abnormal in response to the job code TN together with the state of and cause for the abnormality and so on in response to the result data D. The processing unit


34


clears the area


341


to


345


to zero and resets the timers


104


to


107


to be “0”, thus effecting the stop state (at the process


857


).




Thus, the monitoring of the job execution is completed.




(5) Abnormal Detection and Processings therefor




The timer


106


of

FIG. 2

is, as has been described hereinbefore, a timer for monitoring whether or not the job execution declaration was normally performed. The timer


106


is so constructed that it is timed out at a time T


2


, which is slightly longer than the time for the job execution declaration message DCM to be sent from the job executing processor and to circulate once through the loop transmission line


1


and return, thereby to generate a time-up signal until it is stopped.




The timer


107


of

FIG. 2

is, as has been described hereinbefore, a timer for monitoring whether or not the job is being normally executed. The timer


107


is so constructed that it is timed out at a time T


3


, which is the summation of the sending period T


0


of the aforementioned job executing message BM and the time T


3


′ for the message BM to circulate once through the loop and return, thereby to generate a time-up signal until it is stopped.




Therefore, the processing unit


32


judges, when it receives the time-up signal from the timer


106


or


107


, that the job executing processor has become abnormal either during the time period from the candidacy to the declaration of the job execution or during the job execution. The processing unit


32


sends, after the execution of the aforementioned interrupting process, the address JA (which stored in the area


344


) of the processor selected at the aforementioned process


833


of FIG.


7


(C), the code CD


6


indicative of the abnormal broadcasting message and the job code TN to the transmission controller


20


. This transmission controller


20


sets an abnormal broadcasting message AM of

FIG. 12

in the sending buffer area


243


and sends a copy of that message AM to the loop transmission line


1


both similarly to the foregoing description so that it deletes that message AM from the sending buffer area if the copy thereof once circulates and returns. It is judged whether or not there is in the area


343


the candidacy message CM which has the same sender address SA as the address JA of the area


344


(at a process


861


of FIG.


7


(E)). If there is no message, the process to be taken because the processor of the address JA is abnormal (which process will be called a “countermeasure process”, as will be detailed hereinafter) has been already completed. Therefore, not the countermeasure process but the aforementioned interrupt releasing process is executed, thus ending the processings. If that candidacy message CM is in the area


343


, there is a necessity for that countermeasure process, and the process is advanced to


862


. The processing unit


32


deletes the candidacy message CM, which has the same sender address SA as the address JA, from the area


342


. After that, it is judged whether or not the candidacy message CM is in the area


343


(at a process


863


). If there is no message having the same address, it is necessary to advance the process from the reception of the candidacy CM. Therefore, the candidacy closing timer


105


is reset and left to be “0” (at a process


864


). After that, the aforementioned interrupt releasing process is performed. If there is a message CM having the same address, the timer


105


is reset to be “0” and is started (at a process


865


), thus effecting the aforementioned interrupt releasing process.




Thus, the processes of the processors having detected the abnormality in the job executing processor are completed.




At the processor having received the abnormal broadcasting message AM from the transmission line


1


, on the other hand, the processing unit


32


consecutively executes the processes


801


and


803


of FIG.


7


(A), the process


821


of FIG.


7


(B) and the processes


851


,


853


and


856


of FIG.


7


(D), after the aforementioned interrupting process, and detects that the code of the area of that message AM is CD


6


, after which it is shifted to a process


860


. The address JA of the area


61


of that abnormal broadcasting message AM is stored in the area


344


. After that, the process is advanced to the aforementioned one


361


, at which the same processing as the foregoing description is executed, so that the candidacy message CM (i.e., the candidacy message MC of the processor at an abnormal state) of the address JA is brought into a state at which it is deleted from the area


343


.




As the time elapses, moreover, the respective timers


105


of the plural processors at the monitored state are timed out. The respective processors at the monitored state are shifted to the aforementioned process


833


of FIG.


7


(C) in response to the time-up signals of their own timers


105


thereby to select the processor to execute the job in response to the candidacy message of the processor at the abnormal state. Therefore, the processor to execute the job is elected from the processors at the monitored state thereby to effect the job execution.




The processes thus far described are repeated on and on.




In case the processor


12


becomes abnormal, one processor


13


of the plural processors


11


,


13


and


14


monitoring that processor


12


becomes the processor to execute the job, whereas the processors


11


and


14


monitor the processor


13


. If the processor


13


becomes abnormal, too, one processor


11


of those monitoring processors


11


and


14


becomes the processor to execute the job, whereas the remaining processor


14


monitors the processor


11


.




In the embodiment thus far described, incidentally, the relative time RT has been used to elect the processor to execute the job. Nevertheless, that relative time RT may be replaced by an accumulated load ratio P.




Here, this load ratio P is expressed by the following Equation:






P
=



Accumulated Executing Time


Accumulated Running Time


.











In an alternative, a value PRT to be determined from the load ratio P and the relative time RT may also be used in place of the load ratio P.




Here, the value PRT is expressed by the following Equation:






PRT=ƒ(P,RT),






(wherein f for a function).




On the other hand, the time-up periods of the timers


104


to


107


of the embodiment thus far described are naturally determined on the basis of both the transmission time (which contains the resending time of the message in case it is necessary due to noises or the like for the message to be sent again), which is either actually measured or calculated between the information processor and the transmission control, and the transmission time (which contains the resending time of the message in case it is necessary due to noises or the like for the message to be sent again or which is determined by considering a bypass passage when there is a possibility of forming the bypass passage) between the respective two of the information processors.




As has been described hereinbefore, according to the present invention, there can be attained the following advantages:




(1) The job can be executed without fail. Specifically, no matter what processor gets out of order and no matter when the disorder takes place, that job never fails to be backed up by another processor.




(2) The loads upon the respective processors can be averaged. Specifically, it is possible to execute the job by such a processor of the plural processors as is judged to have the lightest load.




(3) Sufficient expandability can be enjoyed. Specifically, the processors can be increased or decreased without any difficulty partly because the functions of the respective processors are identical and partly because the process neither depends upon the number of the processors of the system nor requires the address of the receiver.



Claims
  • 1. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission line, comprising:a first step of detecting by at least one of said processing devices the occurrence of a job to be executed and transmitting from said one processing device a job occurrence message on said common transmission line, said job occurrence message including job content information characterizing the job to be executed; a second step of receiving said job occurrence message from said transmission line at least at one of said plurality of processing devices other than the one processing device which has transmitted said message and storing said job content information in the processing device or devices which have received said job occurrence message; and a third step of starting the execution of said job, which is identified by stored job content information, in a candidate processing device selected from candidate processing devices including the processing device which has transmitted said job occurrence message and said processing devices receiving said job occurrence message, said selection occurring in response to a selection process carried out within each such processing device so that the processing device which executes said job selects itself for this function on the basis of its capabilities and those of the other candidate processing devices.
  • 2. A job processing method according to claim 1, wherein said third step includes transmitting from each candidate processing device on said common transmission line a candidacy message which includes processing device capability information relating to the processing device transmitting said message, receiving the candidacy messages from said transmission line at each candidate processing device and judging in each candidate processing device whether that processing device is to execute said job on the basis of the received processing device capability information.
  • 3. A job processing method according to claim 2, wherein said processing device capability information in each candidacy message includes current load information relating to the processing device transmitting that message, and said judging in each candidate processing device whether that processing device is to execute said job includes comparing the current load information in each received candidacy message and the current load information of the processing device itself.
  • 4. A job processing method according to claim 3, wherein said judging in each candidate processing device is effected a predetermined time after a candidacy message is first received in that processing device.
  • 5. A job processing method according to claims 1 or 3, wherein each processing device has stored therein job assignment information identifying one or more types of jobs to be executed by that processing device, and wherein said second step includes comparing the job content information in each job occurrence message transmitted on said common transmission line with job assignment information stored in each processing device, and, receiving a job occurrence message and storing the job content information thereof only in those processing devices which are assigned to execute the type of job identified by that job content information.
  • 6. A job processing method according to claim 5, wherein plural processing devices store job assignment information identifying the same type of job.
  • 7. A job processing method according to claim 2, further including:a fourth step of monitoring the operation of said one candidate processing device which is executing said job by the other candidate processing devices to detect an abnormality in operation; and a fifth step of starting execution of said job, which is identified by stored job content information, in one of said other candidate processing devices in the case where an abnormality in the operation of said one candidate processing device is detected during the monitoring of the operation thereof.
  • 8. A job processing method according to claim 7, wherein said fourth step includes transmitting on said common transmission line from said selected candidate processing device a job execution declaration message immediately before said job execution is started and a job executing message during execution of said job, monitoring in said other candidate processing devices for the receipt of said job execution decelerationdeclaration message and job execution message on said common transmission line within predetermined times after receipt therein of a first job occurrence message, and detecting an abnormality in the operation of said selected candidate processing device when said job execution declaration message or said job execution message is not received within said predetermined times.
  • 9. A job processing method according to claims 7 or 8, wherein said fifth step includes transmitting an abnormal broadcasting message on said transmission line when an abnormality is detected in the operation of said selected candidate processing device, receiving said abnormal broadcasting message in the other of said candidate processing devices, and starting execution of said job in one of said other candidate processing devices on the basis of the processing device capability information in the originally received candidacy message.
  • 10. A job processing method according to claim 9, wherein said processing device capability information in each candidacy message includes current load information relating to the processing device transmitting that message, and said judging in each candidate processing device whether that processing device is to execute said job includes comparing the current load information in each received candidacy message and the current load information of the processing device itself.
  • 11. A job processing method according to claims 1 or 3, wherein each processing device has stored therein job assignment information identifying one or more types of jobs to be executed by that processing device in terms of the type of data required thereby, and wherein said second step includes comparing the content code in each job occurrence message transmitted on said common transmission line with job assignment information stored in each processing device, and, receiving a job occurrence message and storing the data thereof only in those processing devices which are assigned to execute the type of job requiring data identified by that content code.
  • 12. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path comprising:a first step of detecting by at least one of said processing devices the occurrence or completion of a job to be executed and transmitting from said one processing device a job occurrence or completion message on said common transmission path, said job occurrence or completion message including data necessary for execution of the job and a content code which indicates the content of said data; a second step of receiving said job occurrence or completion message from said transmission path by at least one other processing device other than the processing device which has transmitted said message; a third step of identifying the job at said other processing device based upon a content code of the received message; a fourth step of executing the identified job at said other processing device; a fifth step of monitoring, by means of at least one of said processing devices, the status of operations of other processing devices based on said content code included in said message, wherein an information processing device the job of which corresponds to said occurrence or completion of a job is a candidate processing device which is selected in response to a selection process carried out within each processing device which selects itself on the basis of its capabilities and those of the other candidate processing devices.
  • 13. A job processing method according to claim 12 wherein each of said processing devices which executed said job sends information related to results of job execution in said fourth step to said transmission path as a message containing a content code.
  • 14. A job processing method according to claim 12, wherein said fourth step includes transmitting from each candidate processing device on said common transmission path a candidacy message which includes processing device capability information relating to said job corresponding to said occurrence of a job, receiving said candidacy messages from said transmission path at each candidate processing device and judging in each candidate processing device whether that processing device is to execute said job on the basis of the received processing device capability information.
  • 15. A job processing method according to claim 14, wherein said processing device capability information in each candidacy message includes current load information relating to the current load of the processing device transmitting that message, and said judging in each candidate processing device whether that processing device is to execute said job includes comparing the current load information in each received candidacy message and the current load information of the processing device itself.
  • 16. A job processing method according to claim 15, wherein said current load information is the time length of relative time from the instant when a job occurrence or completion message is received in a processing device to the instant when the processing device is available for executing a job.
  • 17. A job processing method according to claim 15, wherein said judging in each candidate processing device is effected a predetermined time after a candidacy message is first received in that processing device.
  • 18. A job processing method according to claim 12, wherein plural processing devices store said content code which indicate job assignment information identifying the same type of job in said plural processing devices.
  • 19. A job processing method according to claim 12, wherein said fifth step includes:a step of monitoring the operation of said candidate processing device which is executing said job to detect an abnormality in operation; and said fourth step includes: a step of starting execution of said job, which is identified by said content code stored in the case where an abnormality in the operation or said candidate processing device is detected during the monitoring of the operation thereof.
  • 20. A job processing method according to claim 11, wherein said fourth step includes transmitting on said common transmission path a job execution declaration message immediately before said job execution is started and a job executing message during execution of said job.
  • 21. A job processing method according to claim 20, wherein said fifth step includes monitoring other candidate processing devices executing said job by detecting an abnormality in the operation of said candidate processing device executing said job when said job execution declaration message or said job execution message is not received within predetermined times.
  • 22. A job processing method according to claims 19 or 21, wherein said fourth step includes transmitting an abnormality broadcasting message on said transmission path when an abnormality is detected in the operation of said candidate processing device, receiving said abnormality broadcasting message in the other of said candidate processing device, and starting execution of said job in one of said other candidate processing devices on the basis of the processing device capability information in the originally received candidacy message.
  • 23. A job processing method in a system having a plurality of processing units, each processing unit being coupled to the other processing units through a transmission path and having means for executing a job, comprising:a first step of transmitting from a first processing unit a message relating to a job to be executed; a second step of receiving said message in at least a second processing unit other than said first processing unit which has transmitted said message; a third step of selecting in either of said first or second processing units a job among jobs executable in said processing units based on information of at least one received message when at least first message is received from said one processing unit, said information indicating the content of said at least one message and includes information for permitting said message to be classified into different types; and a fourth step of executing the selected job in said first or second processing unit.
  • 24. A job processing method according to claim 23, wherein said information is identified by processing content codes which represent contents of data included in a received message.
  • 25. A job processing method according to claim 23, wherein said selecting is executed during a time period in which said information is set to be obtained.
  • 26. A job processing method according to claim 23, wherein said information is the data in connection with candidacy of a processing unit for executing a lob.
  • 27. A job processing method according to claim 23, wherein said information is data in connection with a content code and candidacy of processing unit for executing a job.
  • 28. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, comprising:a first step of transmitting from one processing device a message relating to a job occurrence on said common transmission path, said message including data relating to the job to be executed and a content code which indicates the content of said data; a second step of receiving said message from said transmission path in at least one processing device based on said content code; a third step of identifying a job to be executed, in a processing device which has received said message, based on the content code of the received message, said content code indicating the content of said message and includes information for permitting said message to be classified into different types; and a fourth step of executing the identified job in a processing device which has identified said job.
  • 29. A job processing method according to claim 28, which further includes a fifth step of monitoring, in at least one of said processing devices, the status of other processing devices which are executing jobs.
  • 30. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, comprising:a first step of executing a job based on information of a first message received from said common transmission path, said information indicating the content of said first message, and transmitting from at least one of said processing devices a second message on said common transmission path, said second message including status information for indicating the status of the processing device itself during execution of said job; a second step of receiving, in at least one processing device other than the transmitting processing device, said second message from said transmission path; and a third step of monitoring, in at least one of said processing devices, the status of other processing devices based on said status information included in said second message; wherein said first message includes data necessary for execution of a job and a content code as said information indicating the content of said data and includes information for permitting said data to be classified into different types and said second step comprises a step of selectively receiving said first message from said transmission path based on said content code in said first message.
  • 31. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system including a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path for processing a job, comprising:a first step of transmitting, from at least one of said processing devices, a message including data necessary for execution of a job and a content code which indicates the content of said data and includes information for permitting said data to be classified into different types; a second step of receiving and selectively accepting said message, in at least one of said processing devices other than the transmitting processing device, based on said content code in said message; a third step of selecting a program executable in the accepting processing device based on said content code of a received message; and a fourth step of executing the selected program in the accepting processing device.
  • 32. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission line, comprising:a first step of detecting by at least one of said processing devices the occurrence of a job to be executed and transmitting from said one processing device a job occurrence message on said common transmission line, said job occurrence message including data necessary for execution of a job and a content code which indicates the content of said data; a second step of receiving said job occurrence message from said transmission line in at least one of said plurality of processing devices other than the one processing device which has transmitted said message and storing said job content information in the processing device or devices which have received said job occurrence message; and a third step of starting the execution of the job, which is identified by stored job content information, in a candidate processing device selected from candidate processing devices including the processing device which has transmitted said job occurrence message and said processing devices receiving said job occurrence message, said selection occurring in response to a selection process carried out within each such processing device so that the processing device which executes said job selects itself for this function on the basis of its capabilities and those of other candidate processing devices.
  • 33. A job processing method in a system including a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, wherein each of said information processing devices has a processor and first and second memories, comprising:a first step of transmitting a message including data and a content code which represents the content of said data and includes information for permitting said data to be classified into different types; a second step of previously storing in a processing device at least one content code which represents the content of data necessary to the processing device in said first memory; a third step of storing programs to be executed in said second memory; a fourth step of receiving and selectively accepting said transmitted message based on the content code thereof and the content code stored in said first memory; and a fifth step of selecting a program stored in said second memory based on at least one content code in at least one message accepted from at least one other processing device and for executing the selected program.
  • 34. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, comprising:a first step of transmitting from one processing device a message on said common transmission path, said message including data and a content code which indicates the content of said data and includes information for permitting said data to be classified into different types; a second step of receiving and selectively accepting said message from said transmission path in at least one processing device, based on the content code of said message; a third step of determining a job related to said message and whether or not the job is to be executed in a processing device which has accepted said message, based on parameter information of at least that processing device; and a fourth step of executing the job using the data of an accepted message upon determination that a job is to be executed in the processing device which has accepted said message.
  • 35. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, comprising:a first step of transmitting from one processing device a message relating to a job to be executed on said common transmission path; a second step of receiving said message from said transmission path in at least one processing device, based on information included in said message indicating the content of said message and includes information for permitting said message to be classified into different types; a third step of determining whether or not a job is to be executed in a processing device which has received said message, based on parameter information of the receiving processing device; and a fourth step of executing the job using the data of the received message, when it is determined that the job is to be executed, in the processing device which has received said message.
  • 36. A job processing method according to claim 39 or 35, which further includes a fifth step of monitoring in at least one of said processing devices, the status of other processing devices which are executing jobs.
  • 37. A job processing method according to claim 34 or 35, wherein said parameter information includes at least one of loading information and a random number.
  • 38. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path comprising:a first step of detecting by at least one of said processing devices the occurrence or completion of a job to be executed and transmitting from said one processing device a job occurrence or completion message on said common transmission path, said job occurrence or completion message including data necessary for execution of the job and a content code which indicates the content of said data; a second step of receiving said job occurrence or completion message from said transmission path by at least one other processing device other than the processing device which has transmitted said message; a third step of identifying the job at said other processing device based upon a content code of the received message; a fourth step of selecting from a processing device which has transmitted a job occurrence message and said processing devices receiving said job occurrence message a processing device to execute said job, said selection occurring in response to a selection process carried out within each processing device so that the processing device which executes said job selects itself to execute said job on the basis of its capabilities and the capabilities of the other processing devices; a fifth of executing the identified job at said selected processing device; a sixth step of monitoring, by means of at least one of said processing devices, the status of operations of other processing devices based on said content code included in said message.
  • 39. A job processing method for operation information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, comprising:a first step of transmitting from one processing device a message relating to a job occurrence on said common transmission path, said message including data relating to the job to be executed and a content code which indicates the content of said data; a second step of receiving said message from said transmission path in at least one processing device; a third step of identifying a job to be executed, in a processing device which has received said message, based on the content code of the received message; a fourth step of selecting from the processing device which transmitted said message and said processing devices which received said message, a processing device to execute the identified job, said selection occurring in response to a selection process carried out within each processing device no that the processing device which executes said job selects itself to execute said job on the basis of its capabilities and the capabilities of the other processing devices; and a fifth step of executing the identified job in the selected processing device.
  • 40. A job processing method in a system including a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, wherein each of said information processing devices has a processor and first and second memories, comprising:a first step of transmitting a message including data and a content code which represents the content of said data and includes information for permitting said data to be classified into different types; a second step of previously storing in a processing device at least one content code which represents the content of data necessary to the processing device in said first memory; a third step of storing programs to be executed in said second memory; a fourth step of receiving and selectively accepting said transmitted message in at least one of said processing devices other than the transmitting processing device the accepting being carried out in each receiving processing device and being selectively based on the content code thereof and the content code stored in said first memory; and a fifth step of selecting a program stored in said second memory based on at least one content code in at least one message accepted from at least one other processing device and executing the selected program.
  • 41. A job processing method for operation of an information processing system which includes a plurality of information processing devices interconnected by means of a common transmission path, comprising:a first step of transmitting from a processing a device a message on said common transmission path, said message including data and a content code which indicates the content of said data and includes information for permitting said data to be classified into different types; a second step of receiving and selectively accepting said message from said transmission path in at least one processing device, based on the content code of said message; a third step of determining a job related to said message and whether or not the job is to be executed in the at least one processing device which has accepted said message, based on parameter information of at least that processing device; and a fourth step of executing the job using the data of an accepted message upon determination that a job is to be executed in the at least one processing device which has accepted said message.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
56-6398 Jan 1981 JP
Parent Case Info

This application is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/436,862, filed on May 8, 1995, now abandoned which is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/625,779 filed on Dec. 7, 1990, now abandoned which is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 06/894,820, filed Jul. 24, 1986 now abandoned which is a Reissue application of U.S. Pat. No. 4,462,075 issued Jul. 24, 1984.

US Referenced Citations (16)
Number Name Date Kind
3593300 Driscoll, Jr. et al. Jul 1971 A
3665404 Werner May 1972 A
3702006 Page Oct 1972 A
3755789 Collins Aug 1973 A
3970994 Jenny Jul 1976 A
4007450 Haibt et al. Feb 1977 A
4096571 Vander Mey Jun 1978 A
4099235 Hoschler et al. Jul 1978 A
4183083 Chatfield Jan 1980 A
4228496 Katzman et al. Oct 1980 A
4262331 Freeland et al. Apr 1981 A
4276593 Hansen Jun 1981 A
4319338 Grudowski et al. Mar 1982 A
4323966 Whiteside et al. Apr 1982 A
4358823 McDonald et al. Nov 1982 A
4366535 Cedolin et al. Dec 1982 A
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
0066039 May 1980 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (3)
Entry
Marsicek RR, et al. “Distributed Data Processing System,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Oct. 1980, pp 1805-1810.*
Sams JG, “Node Processor for Distributed System Control,” IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Oct. 1980, pp. 1811-1812.*
Arnold et al, “A Hierarchical Restructurable Multi-Microprocessor Architecture”, Jan. 19, 1976, pp 40-45.
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 06/337452 Jan 1982 US
Child 08/668201 US
Continuations (3)
Number Date Country
Parent 08/436862 May 1995 US
Child 06/337452 US
Parent 07/625779 Dec 1990 US
Child 08/436862 US
Parent 06/894820 Jul 1986 US
Child 07/625779 US
Reissues (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 06/337452 Jan 1982 US
Child 08/668201 US