1. Field of Invention
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to systems and methods of processing hydrocarbons. More specifically, embodiments of the invention relate to recovery of natural gas liquids and a pressurized methane-rich sales gas from liquefied natural gas.
2. Description of Related Art
Natural gas is commonly recovered in remote areas where natural gas production exceeds demand within a range where pipeline transportation of the natural gas is feasible. Thus, converting the vapor natural gas stream into a liquefied natural gas (LNG) stream makes it economical to transport the natural gas in special LNG tankers to appropriate LNG handling and storage terminals where there is increased market demand. The LNG can then be revaporized and used as a gaseous fuel for transmission through natural gas pipelines to consumers.
The LNG consists primarily of saturated hydrocarbon components such as methane, ethane, propane, butane, etc. Additionally, the LNG may contain trace quantities of nitrogen, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. Separation of the LNG provides a pipeline quality gaseous fraction of primarily methane that conforms to pipeline specifications and a less volatile liquid hydrocarbon fraction known as natural gas liquids (NGL). The NGL include ethane, propane, butane, and minor amounts of other heavy hydrocarbons. Depending on market conditions it may be desirable to recover the NGL because its components may have a higher value as liquid products, where they are used as petrochemical feedstocks, compared to their value as fuel gas.
Various techniques currently exist for separating the methane from the NGL during processing of the LNG. Information relating to the recovery of natural gas liquids and/or LNG revaporization can be found in: Yang, C. C. et al., “Cost effective design reduces C2 and C3 at LNG receiving terminals,” Oil and Gas Journal, May 26, 2003, pp. 50-53; US 2005/0155381 A1; US 2003/158458 A1; GB 1 150 798; FR 2 804 751 A; US 2002/029585; GB 1 008 394 A; U.S. Pat. No. 3,446,029; and S. Huang, et al., “Select the Optimum Extraction Method for LNG Regasification,” Hydrocarbon Processing, vol. 83, July 2004, pp. 57-62.
There exists, however, a need for systems and methods of processing LNG that increase efficiency when separating NGL from a methane-rich gas stream. There exists a further need for systems and methods of processing LNG that enable selective diverting of the LNG to a flow path that vaporizes both methane and ethane plus within the LNG.
Embodiments of the invention generally relate to methods and systems for recovery of natural gas liquids (NGL) and a pressurized methane-rich sales gas from liquefied natural gas (LNG). In certain embodiments, LNG passes through a heat exchanger, thereby heating and vaporizing at least a portion of the LNG. The partially vaporized LNG passes to a fractionation column where a liquid stream enriched with ethane plus and a methane-rich vapor stream are withdrawn. The withdrawn methane-rich vapor stream passes through the heat exchanger to condense the vapor and produce a two phase stream, which is separated in a separator into at least a methane-rich liquid portion and a methane-rich gas portion. A pump pressurizes the methane-rich liquid portion prior to vaporization and delivery to a pipeline. The methane-rich gas portion may be compressed and combined with the vaporized methane-rich liquid portion or used as plant site fuel.
Aspects of specific embodiments of the inventions are shown in the following drawing:
A detailed description will now be provided. Each of the appended claims defines a separate invention, which for infringement purposes is recognized as including equivalents to the various elements or limitations specified in the claims. Depending on the context, all references below to the “invention” may in some cases refer to certain specific embodiments only. In other cases it will be recognized that references to the “invention” will refer to subject matter recited in one or more, but not necessarily all, of the claims. Each of the inventions will now be described in greater detail below, including specific embodiments, versions and examples, but the inventions are not limited to these embodiments, versions or examples, which are included to enable a person having ordinary skill in the art to make and use the inventions, when the information in this patent is combined with available information and technology. Various terms as used herein are defined below. To the extent a term used in a claim is not defined below, it should be given the broadest definition persons in the pertinent art have given that term as reflected in one or more printed publications or issued patents.
The term “heat exchanger” broadly means any device capable of transferring heat from one media to another media, including particularly any structure, e.g., device commonly referred to as a heat exchanger. Thus, the heat exchanger may be a plate-and-frame, shell-and-tube, spiral, hairpin, core, core-and-kettle, double-pipe or any other type on known heat exchanger. Preferably, the heat exchanger is a brazed aluminum plate fin type.
The term “fractionation system” means any structure that has one or more distillation columns, e.g., a heated column containing trays and/or random or structured packing to provide contact between liquids falling downward and vapors rising upward. The fractionation system may include one or more columns for recovering NGL, which may be processed in one or more additional fractionation columns to separate the NGL into separate products including ethane, propane and butane plus fractions.
The term “liquefied natural gas” (LNG) means natural gas from a crude oil well (associated gas) or from a gas well (non-associated gas) that is in liquid form, e.g., has undergone some form of liquefaction. In general, the LNG contains methane (C1) as a major component along with minor components such as ethane (C2) and higher hydrocarbons and contaminants such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulfide, and nitrogen. For example, typical C1 concentration in LNG (prior to removal of ethane) is between about 87% and 92%, and typical C2 concentration in LNG is between about 4% and 12%.
The term “methane-rich” refers broadly to any vapor or liquid stream, e.g., after fractionation from which ethane plus amounts have been recovered. Thus, a methane-rich stream has a higher concentration of C1 than the concentration of C1 in LNG. Preferably, the concentration increase of C1 is from removal of at least 95% of the ethane in the LNG and removal of substantially all of the propane plus.
The terms “natural gas liquids” (NGL) and “ethane plus” (C2+) refer broadly to hydrocarbons having two or more carbons such as ethane, propane, butane and possibly small quantities of pentanes or higher hydrocarbons. Preferably, NGL have a methane concentration of 0.5 mol percent or less.
The term “plant site fuel” refers to fuel required to run and operate a plant that may include a system for processing LNG such as described herein. For example, the amount of plant site fuel may amount to approximately 1% of a delivery gas produced by the system.
In certain embodiments, a method of processing liquefied natural gas (LNG) includes passing LNG through a heat exchanger to provide heated LNG, fractionating the heated LNG into a methane-rich vapor stream and a natural gas liquids (NGL) stream, passing the methane-rich vapor stream through the heat exchanger to transfer heat from the methane-rich vapor stream to the LNG passing through the heat exchanger and to provide a two-phase stream that includes a methane-rich liquid phase and a methane-rich vapor phase, separating the two-phase stream into at least a methane-rich liquid portion and a methane-rich gas portion, increasing the pressure of the methane-rich liquid portion to provide a sendout liquid stream and recovering the sendout liquid stream to provide a sales gas for delivery to a pipeline.
In other embodiments, a system for processing liquefied natural gas (LNG) includes a heat exchanger, an LNG inlet line in fluid communication with an LNG source and the heat exchanger, configured such that LNG is capable of passing through the LNG inlet line and the heat exchanger, a fractionation system in fluid communication with the heat exchanger, the fractionation system having a first outlet for a methane-rich vapor stream and a second outlet for a natural gas liquids (NGL) stream, a vapor-liquid separator, a condensation line fluidly connecting the first outlet of the fractionation system to the vapor-liquid separator, the condensation line passing though the heat exchanger, configured such that heat from the methane-rich vapor stream is transferred to any LNG passing through the heat exchanger, a pump having an inlet in fluid communication with a liquid recovered in the vapor-liquid separator, and a vaporizer in fluid communication with an outlet of the pump and a pipeline for delivery of sales gas.
In other embodiments, a method of processing liquefied natural gas (LNG) includes (a) providing LNG containing natural gas liquids (NGL), (b) increasing the pressure of the LNG to a first pressure to provide pressurized LNG, (c) passing the pressurized LNG through a heat exchanger to heat the LNG and provide heated LNG, (d) passing the heated LNG to a separation system that produces a methane-rich vapor stream and an NGL stream, (e) passing the methane-rich vapor stream produced by the separation system through the heat exchanger, to provide a two-phase stream that includes a liquid phase and a vapor phase, (f) separating the two-phase stream into at least a liquid portion and a gas portion, (g) increasing the pressure of the liquid portion produced by the methane-rich vapor stream passing through the heat exchanger to a second pressure which is higher than the first pressure to provide a pressurized liquid portion and (h) vaporizing at least a portion of the pressurized liquid portion without further removal of an ethane plus component to produce a high-pressure, methane-rich gas.
An LNG processing system 100 includes an LNG supply 101, a primary heat exchanger 122, a fractionation column 128, and an output separator 144. The LNG supply 101 feeds into an LNG tank 102 where a boil-off vapor stream 104 from the LNG tank 102 is compressed by a feed compressor 106 and an LNG liquid stream 108 from the LNG tank 102 is increased in pressure by a preliminary feed pump 110 prior to mixing in a feed mixer 111 where the compressed boiloff vapor is condensed in order to provide a single phase LNG liquid feed stream 112. The LNG liquid feed stream 112 passes to a main feed pump 114 to increase the pressure of the LNG liquid feed stream 112 to a desired operating pressure that depends on a variety of factors, e.g., the operating parameters of the fractionation column 128 and the desired composition of the NGL to be recovered. Output from the pump 114 creates a pressurized feed stream 116. Preferably, the operating pressure of the pressurized feed stream 116 is between approximately 500 and 600 psia. Alternatively, the operating pressure may range from as low as 200, or 300, or 400 psia to as high as 700, or 800, or 900 psia. In some applications, the LNG supply 101 is at a sufficient operating pressure such that the LNG supply 101 feeds into the heat exchanger 122 without requiring increase in pressure. A portion of the pressurized feed stream 116 may be separated to provide a reflux stream 118 that provides an external reflux for the fractionation column 128.
The pressurized feed stream 116 feeds the primary heat exchanger 122 where the pressurized feed stream 116 is heated and partially or wholly vaporized. The pressurized feed stream 116 is preferably at a temperature of about −250° F. before it enters the primary heat exchanger 122. Feed stream 116 passes through the primary heat exchanger 122, then it may also pass through an external heat supply 124, e.g., an optional feed vaporizer, which provides further heating. In a particular advantageous feature, the external heat supply 124 can provide temperature modulation prior to feeding of the LNG stream to a demethanizer separator 126 as a heated feed stream 125 at a temperature that is preferably approximately −120° F., but alternatively can range from a low of −160° F., or −150° F., or −140° F., to a high of −110° F., or −100° F., or −90° F. The demethanizer separator 126 is preferably a fractionation column, and may be omitted, combined with or an integral part of the fractionation column 128 in some embodiments, e.g., to form a fractionation system. The demethanizer separator 126 provides separation of the heated feed stream 125 into a gas phase that forms a methane-rich vapor stream 136 and a liquid phase that forms a fractionation column feed stream 127. The fractionation column feed stream 127 enters the fractionation column 128 and fractionates into a methane-rich overhead stream 134 and an NGL stream 132. A reboiler 130 for the fractionation column 128 adds heat to facilitate distillation operations and increase removal of methane from the NGL. The reboiler 130 may add heat by one or more submerged combustion vaporizers or a stand alone heating system.
The methane-rich overhead stream 134 from the fractionation column 128 mixes with the methane-rich vapor stream 136 in vapor mixer 138 to provide a combined methane-rich vapor stream 140. The vapor stream 140 passes through the primary heat exchanger 122 where the vapor stream 140 exchanges heat with the feed stream 116, thereby effectively utilizing the refrigeration potential of the LNG supply 101 which is preferably at a temperature of approximately −250° F. before it enters the heat exchanger, but may also be any desirable temperature, e.g., ranging from a high of −225° F., or −200° F. to a low of −275° F. In at least one advantageous feature, the vapor stream 140 is not compressed prior to being passed through the primary heat exchanger 122 in order to increase efficiency in the system 100, based on the premise that gas compression requires more energy than pumping liquid. Thus, compressing the vapor stream 140 prior to condensing the vapor stream 140 in the primary heat exchanger 122 requires more energy than the energy consumed by the system 100 shown in
In a particularly advantageous aspect, the system 100 further enables switching between an “NGL recovery mode” and an “NGL rejection mode.” In the NGL recovery mode, most if not all of the NGL is extracted from the LNG supply 101 prior to vaporization of the LNG supply 101, such as described above. However, in the NGL rejection mode, all of the LNG supply 101 (including ethane plus fractions) is vaporized for delivery to market by a diverted path 300 (see broken lines). The pumps 110, 114, 150 can be used to provide the necessary increase in pressure to the LNG supply 101 in order to reach sendout pressure. Further, heat sources such as reboiler 130, vaporizers 124, 152 and heater 160 provide sufficient energy to heat and vaporize the LNG supply 101 to sendout temperature after being pressurized by the pumps 110, 114, 150. Valves and additional conduits may be utilized to bypass components (e.g., the demethanizer separator 126 and the fractionation column 128) not used during the NGL rejection mode and to arrange the pumps ahead of the heat sources during the NGL rejection mode.
In an additional aspect or alternative, the methane-rich liquid stream 146 may be separated to provide a lean reflux stream 400 that may be increased in pressure by a pump 402 prior to entering the fractionation column 128 as a lean external reflux stream 404. In order to further improve the effectiveness of the lean external reflux stream 404 in removing heavier hydrocarbons from the overhead of the fractionation column 128, the lean external reflux stream 404 may be chilled by a reflux heat exchanger (not shown) that acts to cool the lean external reflux stream 404 against the pressurized feed stream 116. In a further aspect, the system 100 may include a condenser 500 in fluid communication (e.g., flow path 501) with a condenser heat exchanger 502. The condenser 500 may be a separate or integral part of a rectification section of the fractionation column 128. Fractionation tower overhead heat exchanges directly or indirectly with the pressurized feed stream 116 via the condenser heat exchanger 502 in order to provide a condenser reflux stream 504 for the fractionation column 128. The external refluxes provide particular utility for removing higher hydrocarbons than ethane from the LNG supply 101 and increasing the percentage of NGL removed from the methane-rich overhead stream 134.
In another embodiment where at least a portion of the NGL stream 132 is not delivered directly to market at high pressure, the system 100 may include an NGL heat exchanger 600 to chill the NGL stream 132 against the pressurized feed stream 116 so that there is minimal flash once the NGL stream 132 reduces to atmospheric pressure for storage in an ethane tank 602 or delivery in an output NGL stream 604 at atmospheric pressure. A flash gas stream 606 from the ethane tank 602 may be compressed by an ethane compressor 608 and fed to the bottom of the fractionation column 128 in order to increase NGL recovery via NGL stream 132, avoid flaring of the flash gas stream 606, and reduce the duty of the reboiler 130.
Described below are examples of aspects of the processes described herein, using (but not limited to) the reference characters in
A hypothetical mass and energy balance is carried out in connection with the process shown in solid line in
Table 2 shows a part of another simulation, which provides a comparison of the NGL recovery mode (using the embodiment shown in solid line in
Table 3 illustrates examples of different alternative concentration ranges of C1 and C2+ in various streams shown in
This application is the National Stage of International Application PCT/US05/29287 filed Aug. 17, 2005 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application 60/609,629, filed 14 Sep., 2004.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/029287 | 8/17/2005 | WO | 00 | 3/6/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/031362 | 3/23/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2541569 | Born et al. | Feb 1951 | A |
2601077 | Wylie | Jun 1952 | A |
2952984 | Marshall | Sep 1960 | A |
2975607 | Bodle | Mar 1961 | A |
3253418 | Harmens | May 1966 | A |
3261169 | Harmens | Jul 1966 | A |
3282060 | Hays | Nov 1966 | A |
3331214 | Proctor et al. | Jul 1967 | A |
3367122 | Tutton | Feb 1968 | A |
3405530 | Denahan et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3407052 | Huntress et al. | Oct 1968 | A |
3420068 | Petit | Jan 1969 | A |
3446029 | Grgurich et al. | May 1969 | A |
3452548 | Pitaro | Jul 1969 | A |
3456032 | Kniel | Jul 1969 | A |
3524897 | Kniel | Aug 1970 | A |
3548024 | Kniel | Dec 1970 | A |
3633371 | Davison | Jan 1972 | A |
3656312 | Streich | Apr 1972 | A |
3663644 | Harvey | May 1972 | A |
3721099 | Forg et al. | Mar 1973 | A |
3724229 | Seliber | Apr 1973 | A |
3766583 | Phelps | Oct 1973 | A |
3827247 | Kojima et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3837172 | Markbreiter et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3837821 | Buffiere et al. | Sep 1974 | A |
3846993 | Bates | Nov 1974 | A |
3849096 | Kniel | Nov 1974 | A |
3950958 | Loofbourow | Apr 1976 | A |
3990256 | May et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4121917 | Baker et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4399659 | Strigl | Aug 1983 | A |
4437312 | Newton et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4444015 | Matsumoto et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4479350 | Newton et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4526594 | Mehra | Jul 1985 | A |
4675037 | Newton | Jun 1987 | A |
4690702 | Paradowski et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4710212 | Hanson et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4732598 | Rowles et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4738699 | Apffel | Apr 1988 | A |
4747858 | Gottier | May 1988 | A |
4753667 | O'Connell et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4778498 | Hanson et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4995234 | Kooy et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5114451 | Rambo et al. | May 1992 | A |
5141543 | Agrawal et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5359856 | Rhoades et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5390499 | Rhoades et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5394686 | Child et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5421165 | Paradowski et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5505049 | Coyle et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5615561 | Houshmand et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5881569 | Campbell et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5890378 | Rambo et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5893274 | Nagelvoort et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5983664 | Campbell et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6014869 | Elion et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6070429 | Low et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089028 | Bowen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6109061 | Gaskin | Aug 2000 | A |
6116031 | Minta et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6237365 | Trebble | May 2001 | B1 |
6298671 | Kennelley et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6367258 | Wen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374591 | Johnson et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401486 | Lee et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6474101 | Quine et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510706 | Stone et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6517286 | Latchem | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6564579 | McCartney | May 2003 | B1 |
6564580 | Bowen et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6578365 | Sicherman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6604380 | Reddick et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
20010042376 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020029585 | Stone et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020134455 | Emblem et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020174662 | Frimm et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005698 | Keller | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014981 | Kimble et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014995 | Bowen et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030158458 | Prim | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050155381 | Yang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050218041 | Yoshida et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 818 527 | Jan 1998 | EP |
2 804 751 | Aug 2001 | FR |
1008394 | Oct 1965 | GB |
1150798 | Apr 1969 | GB |
57-43099 | Mar 1982 | JP |
WO 9000589 | Jan 1990 | WO |
WO 9950536 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 9950537 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0036333 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO 03023304 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 2006026525 | Mar 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080087041 A1 | Apr 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60609629 | Sep 2004 | US |