Method of extracting zinc from brines

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the field of metal extraction, and more specifically to methods of extracting metals from brines.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Over the past twenty years, many attempts have been made and described in both patent and scientific literature to successfully extract zinc in an efficient and cost-effective manner from geothermal brines, which contain various mixtures of metals and minerals. Among prior art methods was a process first performed approximately twenty years ago involving the addition of lime to precipitate metals from the brine and subsequently separating the metals. Selective sulfide precipitation was also attempted [R. W. Bartlett et al, "Sulfide Precipitation of Heavy Metals from High Salinity Geothermal Brine," Geothermal Resource Council, Transactions, 3:39-42 (1979)]. A variety of more sophisticated processes were developed, e.g., electrowinning, which involves the water stripping of a R.sub.2 NH.sub.2.sup..revreaction.+ extractant followed by reextraction using di-2-ethylhexyl-phosphoric acid (D-2-EHPA) with a catholyte strip, resulting in the formation of zinc sulfate [E. D. Nogueira et al, Engineering and Mining Journal, 180(10):92-94 (1979) ].
As one example of reportedly unsuccessful prior art, Byeseda, U. S. Pat. No. 4,624,704 refers to a method for selectively recovering zinc from metal-containing brines, which employs the steps of contacting brine with an organic agent to form a zinc amine, and transferring a large amount of the zinc to the organic phase, where it is then contacted with an aqueous strippant solution. While the patent reports that the zinc and zinc amine complex are transferred to an aqueous zinc chloride solution, from which zinc may be recovered by electrowinning, the present inventors have tried this method and found it produces only very low concentrations of zinc in the aqueous phase and long contact and settling times of 5 and 15 minutes, respectively. The concentration and time restraints limit the volume of brines which can be handled by the conventional extracting equipment and thus, the amount of zinc which can be produced. The low zinc concentration and Cl.sup.- accumulation in the strippant which precludes heavy recycle renders a technically-feasible process incapable of practical use. This method is not only not used anywhere in the world to remove zinc from brine, but the assignee of the patent has completely withdrawn from the applicable business.
Another zinc extraction process was disclosed in A. Maimoni, Geothermics, 11(4):239-258 (1982) involving a cementation process using iron as a reducing agent for cementation. In the practice of this process, a silica sludge accumulates in the equipment and requires periodic removal. It should further be noted that this process was never commercially developed.
Other prior art methods for removing zinc from brines includes, among others, U. S. Pat. No. 3,923,976; E. D. Nogueira et al, Complex Sulphide Ores, Pap. Conf., p. 227-233 (1980); E. D. Nogueria et al, Chemistry and Industry, Z:63-67 (1980); F. L. Moor et al, Plat. Surf. Finish., (August 1976); C. MacDonald, "Solvent Extraction Studies Using High Molecular Weight Amines Progress Report", Texas Southern University, Houston (July 1975); and C. MacDonald, "Removal of Toxic Metals from Metal Finishing Waste Water By Solvent Extraction", Texas Southern University, Houston U7816 (February 1978). Prior to the present invention, a vast resource of this mineral has been untapped because none of the above-referenced publications are capable of providing a successful process for extracting zinc from brines, which process is able to overcome both scientific and economic obstacles [see, e.g., E. D. Nogueira et al, "Design Features and Operating Experience of The Quimigal Zincex Plant," Chloride Electrometall., Proc. Symp., 59-76 (1982)].
There thus remains a need in the art for a method for extracting zinc from geothermal brines which is both technically and practically feasible, and which permits zinc to be extracted efficiently and quickly from available sources.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an improved economically advantageous method of recovering metals, particularly zinc, from brines. Under the inventors' designed operating conditions, this process is kinetically much quicker than the processes known in the art, and produces a concentrated aqueous zinc strip liquor and thus can be performed continuously and in an in-line system, rather than by batch, because of the high final zinc concentration and decreased contact time needed between the organic extractant and the brine.
In one aspect, the present invention provides a process which permits the extraction of Zn from a natural or synthetic brine which contains salts of sodium, potassium and calcium chlorides, as well as a number of other elements including manganese, iron, lead, silver, magnesium, strontium and lithium. The ability to rapidly and selectively extract zinc in the presence of many metals so that greater than 90% recovery is obtained is a significant advantage of the method of the invention.
This process comprises several steps, such as, providing Zn in an organic extractant at a concentration of between about 1 to 4 g/L. This step requires that substantially all Fe and Mn be removed from the organic, and then the Zn stripped therefrom using an ammoniacal salt solution to generate a 10 to 50 g/L Zn concentrate.
In one embodiment, after substantially all silica is removed, the brine is then run through a circuit or cycle which is made up of the following steps, some of which may be performed more than once during a single cycle:
(1) contacting the brine with a selected organic, e.g., a quaternary amine, to extract Zn therefrom; and thereafter separating the loaded organic from the aqueous brine raffinate;
(2) scrubbing the loaded organic with a dilute brine solution or acidified brine, which removes the co-extracted Fe and Mn from the loaded organic; and
(3) stripping the Zn from the scrubbed organic with an ammoniacal CaCl.sub.2 solution to produce a concentrated and purified Zn strip solution with a Zn concentration of at least 10 g/L.
Application of conventional techniques to the concentrated Zn strip solution may result in recovery of the zinc.
In yet another embodiment, the process of the invention is also used to extract Zn from synthetic brines which may contain either Fe or Mn, such as certain waste stream brines. In this embodiment, the extraction process described herein is modified by removing the scrubbing step when Fe and Mn are not present.
Other aspects and advantages of the present invention are described further in the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a Zinc Solvent Extractions Circuit.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an optional two stage counter current Zinc Extraction step useful in step 1 of the overall Circuit of FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides an improved method of extracting zinc (Zn) selectively from a geothermal or synthetic brine which may contain other metal ions including, without limitation, manganese, iron, lead, silver, magnesium, manganese, strontium, calcium, sodium, potassium and lithium. The continuous flow process of this invention enables the zinc to be ultimately recovered via conventional electrowinning techniques. When applied to a natural brine, this process can result in approximately 90% Zn recovery in the strip solution.
A. Preparation of the Geothermal Brine
High temperature, naturally occurring geothermal brine, of which many sources exist in the world, normally contain significant quantities of silica when they are recovered from the earth. As the brines rise to the surface and the pressure decreases, carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide are dispelled from the brine. This in turn reduces the acidity of these brines. Various geothermal brines are characterized by different temperature, pressure and mineral content conditions. In one example of a brine which was subjected to the methods of this invention, a geothermal brine capable of producing steam at ground level is characterized by the following conditions: it is between about 230.degree.-260.degree. C. at a pressure of between 450-700 pounds per square inch (psi).
In addition, steam can be withdrawn from the brines for the purpose of energy generation resulting in substantial reductions in temperature from 230.degree. C. to about 70.degree.-110.degree. C. by flashing of the steam in one or more steps or heat exchange with pure water. This process of removal of acid gases and cooling of the brine during removal from the geothermal wells causes silica present in the brine to precipitate.
Where the brine to be subjected to the process of this invention is geothermal, the first step of the process of this invention involves removing the insoluble amorphous silica precipitate from the brine. The silica solids which have precipitated in the brines as a result of cooling and loss of acid gases are desirably removed from the brines prior to the solvent extraction process. Their removal can be achieved through careful and efficient liquid-solid separation techniques.
The resulting pooled brine, which is now substantially free of colloidal silica, is used as the starting material for the zinc removal process. The term "substantially free of colloidal silica" is defined as containing residual amounts of silica of less than 10 ppm. More preferably, the silica content remaining in the pooled brine is in the range of between about 1 to about 10 ppm SiO.sub.2. The brine, removed of silica, can optionally be reintroduced into the well from which the geothermal brine was tapped. Without its removal, the costly wells are quickly plugged.
Generally an economically desirable amount of pooled, silica-free brine is employed in the following Zn removal steps. This amount of brine will vary with the Zn concentration in the brine, but may be on the order of about 5000 to about 20,000 gpm.
B. Continuous Zinc Recovery from Brines
Most preferably as described above, the starting material for the zinc extraction cycle is pooled flashed brine which is substantially free of colloidal silica at a temperature of about 70.degree. C.-110.degree. C. and a pressure of about 1 atm.
The continuous method of the present invention for zinc recovery from brines is referred to herein as the solvent extractions (SX) circuit. It consists of a circuit or cycle made up of some or all of the following steps. In practice, the circuit design utilizes a 2-stage counter-current extraction, 2-stage counter-current scrub, and single strip and wash stages. When metal ions which are prone to oxidation and precipitation are used a closed system from which O.sub.2 is excluded is preferred.
Step One: Zinc Extraction with Amine
Ordinarily, a geothermal brine, e.g., from the Salton Sea area enters Step 1 of the zinc extraction cycle containing approximately 200 to 800 ppm Zn, and preferably 250-800 ppm Zn.
The first step of the process involves contacting the aqueous brine with an organic to extract zinc therefrom. Preferably the ratio of aqueous brine to organic (A/O ratio) for this step ranges from about 2:1 to about 6:1. More desirably, the A/O ratio is from 3.0:1 to 4.5:1, and is preferably about 4:1.
The preferred organic used for Zn extraction is a mixture of an extractant, a modifier and a diluent. The organic extractant used must be stable, resistant to degradation upon prolonged exposure to hot concentrated brine and strip liquor, and virtually water insoluble in both the hot brine and strip liquors. The preferred extractant is a quaternary amine; however, other suitable zinc extractants include solvating extractants, which are useful at 2-3 Molar brines, such as tributyl phosphate (TBP, with aliphatic diluent), di-2-ethylhexylphosphoric acid [D-2-EHPA or DEHP(H)], which is good at low molarity chlorides, versatic and napthenic acid.
Quaternary amine extractants are advantageous over prior art extractants because they are resistant to oxidation and very stable at high temperatures and are selective for Zn. In addition, they allow rapid kinetics of the exchange reaction at high temperatures. In a preferred embodiment, the quaternary amine contains at least three long-chain alkyl groups, each having a carbon chain length of between 6 to 12 carbon atoms. One example is Aliquat 336, containing a C.sub.8 alkyl group [H.sub.3 C(CH.sub.2).sub.5 CHCH.sub.3 ], a tricapryl methyl ammonium chloride reagent supplied by Henkel Corp. Note that this quaternary amine has three capryl alkyl chains and one methyl group on the amine. Aliquat 336 is a strong extractant for Zn and ferric iron from brine solutions and has a lesser affinity for extraction ferrous iron and manganese. The long chain alkyl groups are necessary to render the quaternary amine soluble in the organic phase and insoluble in the aqueous phase. Quaternary amines with 1 or 2 long chain alkyl groups may also be useful. Other desirable quaternary amines include other similar low cost, naturally derived products.
In the organic, the amine extractant is preferably mixed with a modifier in a diluent. A selected modifier is preferably a long-chain alkyl (6 C to 20 C) alcohol, such as Exxal 10, an isodecyl alcohol supplied by Exxon. The modifier increases the solubility of the Zn-amine complex in the diluent. A diluent is preferably a low-vapor pressure, low-viscosity mineral oil, in which the amine and modifier are soluble and which is stable at the elevated temperatures of the geothermal brine. As used in connection with the characterization of the diluent herein, `low` means being sufficiently low to prevent significant losses through vaporization while operating at temperatures of between about 70.degree.-120.degree. C. The diluent may also be mixed with the amine extractant. Diluents may be selected from high boiling, long carbon chain paraffinic hydrocarbons. A preferred diluent is Norpar 15 [Exxon].
Currently, the most preferred organic composition is 10 vol % Aliquat 336 plus 10 vol % Exxal 10 diluted in Norpar 15. One of skill in the art may select another appropriate alternative organic which has the requisite properties, depending upon the characteristics of the brine, operating conditions and value of recovered product.
Zinc (Zn.sup.+2) in the brine exists as an anionic Zn chloride complex (ZnCl.sub.4.sup.-2). When the aqueous brine is mixed with the organic in this step (see FIGS. 1 and 2), the anionic zinc chloride complex is strongly extracted from the brine aqueous phase into the organic phase by the quaternary amine. This reaction is represented by the following formula:
2R.sub.4 NCl+Zn.sup.+2 +2Cl.sup.- .fwdarw.(R.sub.4 N).sub.2 ZnCl.sub.4,
wherein
R represents alkyl groups and (R.sub.4 N)Cl is the chloride salt of the quaternary amine.
Besides Zn, the amine also extracts Fe.sup.+3 strongly and Fe.sup.+2, Mn, and Pb less strongly from brine solutions into the organic phase. This is particularly true if any oxidation has occurred and the iron and manganese are in higher oxidation states, as the ferrous or manganous ions are not strongly complexed or extracted. Optionally, when the process is performed and the potential for oxygen intrusion occurs, Fe powder, wool, or SO.sub.2 may be added to the brine in order to cause reduction of ferric iron to ferrous iron and decrease co-extraction with Zn. Typically, when iron or manganese are co-extracted, they precipitate during the subsequent ammonia stripping process, if not removed.
After this Zn extraction step, the organic (now loaded with the Zn) is separated from the aqueous brine raffinate. The raffinate may be reinjected into the original geothermal well from which it was obtained. The loaded organic may proceed in the SX circuit onto Step Two below, or it may be optionally recycled through the extraction step at least one more time (see FIG. 2).
FIG. 2 illustrates an optional 2-stage counter current Zn extraction step in which brine initially enters the First stage Zn extraction where it is contacted with the organic. The aqueous and organic phases are separated in the first settler, from which the organic phase, concentrated with Zn, goes onto the scrub step 2 and the aqueous brine containing minor amounts of Zn enters the second stage extraction. In the second stage extractor, this aqueous phase is contacted with organic recycled from later SX steps and containing substantially no Zn. The organic is recycled after stripping and washing to remove most of the ammonia. The organic, low in ammonia, may be acidified before Zn extraction. The chloride form of the amine is the most effective form for extraction. If its pH were high, the organic would cause some of the amphoteric elements, e.g., Fe and Mn, to precipitate. Thus, immediately prior to recycling for additional Zn extraction, this stripped organic may be acidified, e.g., by a water and then acid wash to a pH of about 3, to convert the amine back to its chloride form. This recycled organic strongly strips the remaining Zn from the brine. The brine then is sent as aqueous waste back for reinjection into the well. The organic phase, containing the small amount of extracted Zn is then used as the organic in the first stage extraction. This process may be recycled as often as desired.
When the Zn extraction of Step One is complete a desired number of times, the loaded organic, separated from the raffinate proceeds to Step Three of the process.
The kinetic advantage of this extraction step contributes significantly to the overall process and permits extraction of as low as about 0.2 g Zn per liter of brine. Generally, the time during which the brine is contacted with the organic extractant preferably ranges from about 5 to about 25 seconds. As one example of the performance of this step, Zn recoveries have ranged from between 60-87% in 15-second contact time at 90.degree.-95.degree. C. using impeller mixing in a single step process. With in-line mixing and a 9 second contact time, 68% Zn extraction has been obtained. Tests on actual brines has shown greater than 90% extraction in 15 seconds or less with a two stage counter current extraction. The advantages to the process created by these rapid kinetics was not previously recognized by the art.
Step Two: Coextracting Fe and Mn
When oxidation and extraction of Fe and Mn occurs in Step One, it may be necessary to wash or "scrub" the organic phase loaded with Zn and co-extracted iron and manganese with a dilute acidified brine solution in order to remove the co-extracted Fe and Mn from the Zn-loaded organic phase. The dilute brine solution may contain a sufficient salt concentration to prevent an emulsion from forming. Preferably this step occurs at a pH of about 2-4.
The impurities are scrubbed from the Zn-loaded organic with the dilute brine solution. At low Cl concentrations, the impurities chloride complexes are stripped from the organic, whereas the Zn complex is not. SO.sub.2 may be injected in the scrub stage to reduce any Fe.sup.+3 extracted to Fe.sup.+2 which is more easily scrubbed from the organic.
A preferred scrub solution is made up of about 6 gm per liter NaCl and 2 gm per liter CaCl.sub.2, adjusted to a pH of about 2 with a suitable acid, such as 0.27N HCl. For example, for a 50 liter dilute brine solution, the components are 50 liters water, 300 g NaCl, and 132 g CaCl.sub.2 flake (CaCl.sub.2 .multidot.2H.sub.2 O) which is then pH adjusted.
Thereafter the organic phase can be washed with an acidified salt solution or, e.g., HCl and water, until it achieves a desired iron and manganese level. One of skill in the art may prepare washing solutions with acids and salts in various proportions with water without resort to undue experimentation.
Following this step, a preferred level of each of Fe and Mn is reached in the organic phase, e.g., about 20 ppm or less. The scrub solution may also be reinjected back into the well or recycled back into the circuit at an appropriate place.
Step Three.: Stripping Zn from Organic
According to another step of the process of this invention, the Zn is stripped from the scrubbed organic with an ammoniacal salt solution to produce a concentrated and purified Zn strip solution. Stripping is accomplished by adding a suitable strip solution to the above-described extracted and scrubbed organic phase. Zinc is stripped from the organic phase by contacting it with an ammoniacal salt solution to ultimately form the cationic Zn tetraamine complex Zn(NH.sub.3).sub.4.sup.+2.
The strip solution is desirably made up of ammonia and a selected salt. While CaCl.sub.2 is the presently preferred salt, any other alkali or alkaline earth chloride which does not form a precipitate in the system may be substituted for CaCl.sub.2, for example, NaCl, NH.sub.4 Cl or KCl. The presence of a salt in the strip solution increases the solubility of the Zn(NH.sub.3).sub.4.sup.2+ complex in the strip solution and breaks up any emulsions which might otherwise form.
Preferably the amount of ammonia used in the strip solution is between about 1.5N to about 3N NH.sub.3 (or NH.sub.4 OH) with 3N NH.sub.3 being presently preferred. The high ammonia content of the strip solution permits good stripping because of the following complex formations:
(R.sub.4 N).sub.2 ZnCl.sub.4 +4NH.sub.3 .fwdarw.Zn(NH.sub.3).sub.4 Cl.sub.2 +2(R.sub.4 N)Cl
(R.sub.4 N).sub.2 ZnCl.sub.4 +4NH.sub.4 OH.fwdarw.Zn(NH.sub.3).sub.4 Cl.sub.2 +2(R.sub.4 N)Cl+4H.sub.2 O
Currently, the preferred strip solution is made up of 55 g/L NH.sub.3 and 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2. For a 20 liter solution, the components are 15.7 liters water, 1.32 kg calcium chloride flake (CaCl.sub.2 .multidot.2H.sub.2 O), and 3.9 kg ammonium hydroxide (26 degree Baume). The reaction and stripping is preferably performed in less than one minute.
The result of the above step is a pregnant or Zn-containing strip solution (aqueous phase) "loaded" with Zn, containing approximately 10-50 g/L Zn, according to performance of the process in the laboratory. This pregnant strip solution is removed by separation from the organic phase. The concentrated strip solution may then be treated by conventional techniques to permit recovery of the zinc therefrom.
Step Four: NH.sub.3 Wash
An optional step of the SX circuit involves the use of the stripped organic layer resulting from the previous Step 3. The stripped organic layer may be washed or reacted once more with a neutral CaCl.sub.2 or NH.sub.4 Cl solution to remove NH.sub.3 from the organic layer. A preferred wash solution contains 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2. For a 20 liter solution, 20 liters of water is mixed with 1.32 kg calcium chloride flake.
The resulting CaCl.sub.2 or NH.sub.4 Cl solution (aqueous phase) which contains NH.sub.3 is then recycled back to the Zn strip step (Step 3) for reuse. The free NH.sub.3 recovered is treated with more NH.sub.3 /H.sub.2 O and also recycled to the strip step in the circuit. The organic layer is then optionally acidified with HCl to a pH of about 3 to convert the quaternary amine to the neutral, chloride, form, maximizing the effectiveness of the quaternary amine extractability. This washed organic layer is also recycled back to Step 1, the Zn extraction for reuse in the circuit.
This Zn recovered in the strip solution demonstrates that this method can permit conventional equipment to handle large volumes of brine, e.g. 20,000 gallons per minute, by concentrating the zinc to volumes which conventional equipment can handle. Advantageously, the method can produce a concentration in the range of between 10-50 g/L of Zn. In contrast, prior methods using water or salt stripping produced only 2-4 g/L. Thus, this method provides a method of recovering zinc without the need for making substantial hard rock mining a part of the zinc recovery process.
The zinc recovery method according to this invention employs steps for recovering zinc from other natural or synthetic brines, such as those recovered from waste streams. For example, blast furnace dusts contain significant quantities of zinc, from which zinc could be recovered after dissolution. Adaptation of the process of the present invention for removing zinc from synthetic brines offers similar advantages over the processes known to the art. However, because synthetic brines tend not to contain metals, such as lead, iron and manganese, fewer scrubbing steps are required. In some cases, no scrubbing will be required at all. Therefore, this second method is performed utilizing the steps described above, but may omit the scrubbing Step 2 from this process.
The following examples illustrate the preferred methods of the invention. These examples are illustrative only and do not limit the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
Zinc SX Circuit
This example describes a prototype solvent extraction circuit of the present invention. This SX circuit is graphically depicted in FIGS. 1 and 2. The circuit design utilized 2-stage counter-current extraction (FIG. 2), 2-stage counter-current scrub, and single strip and wash stages. Each stage employed a double-walled glass mixer and settler. The mixers and settlers were capped and nitrogen sparged. Recycle from each settler to mixer was controlled by a pinch off valve and monitored by a rotameter. Individual stages were connected by glass tubing.
The outer chamber of each mixer and settler was used as a control jacket. Steam was applied to every vessel except the strip mixer. The strip mixer jacket was piped with water required for cooling.
The entire apparatus was mounted on a vertically positioned fiberglass grate inside a 30 ft by 8 ft trailer. A solution containment tray was placed beneath the entire apparatus for safety. The brine line was insulated 1/2 inch stainless steel pipe and the flow rate was regulated by adjusting a needle valve. Plant water was used to flush the line after each test series.
Reagents for the scrub, strip and wash stages were mixed in 20 or 50 liter plastic containers and administered by diaphragm metering pumps. The organic feed was pumped by gear pump from a metal insulated surge tank.
With reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, the cycle operates as follows. A side stream of brine was fed into the first extraction mixer (Zn EXTRACTION) where it contacted the immiscible organic phase. The emulsion advanced from the mixer to a settler where the phases were separated. The loaded organic phase containing the extracted zinc was then transferred to a scrub section (Fe, Mn SCRUB). The brine continued to the second extraction mixer where it was contacted with the recycled organic. The emulsion then advanced from the mixer to a settler where the phases were separated. The raffinate solution was discharged into a raffinate holding tank (RAFFINATE) .
The loaded organic from the first extraction stage advanced to the first scrub mixer where it was first contacted with the scrub solution (sodium chloride and calcium chloride solution at a neutral pH). The scrub solution strips the undesired metals from the organic. The emulsion then moved from the mixer to a settler where the phases were separated. The organic phase was sent to the second scrub mixer where the final cleansing of the organic occurs. The second scrub stage emulsion then moved from the mixer to a settler where the phases were again separated and the organic was advanced to the strip stage.
The scrubbed organic was advanced from the second scrub settler to the mixer where it was contacted with a solution of 55 g/L ammonia and 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2 (Zn STRIP). The ammonia solution stripped the zinc from the organic phase into the aqueous phase. The emulsion then advanced to a strip settler where the phases were disengaged. The organic moved on to the wash stage (NH.sub.3 WASH), while the zinc laden strip solution was discharged from the circuit into a storage tank (Strip Solution/zinc concentrate).
The barren organic from the strip stage advanced to the wash mixer where it was contacted with the wash solution (55 gpl calcium chloride). The wash solution removed any entrained ammonia from the organic phase. The emulsion then moved from the mixer to a separater. The stripped organic phase advanced to the surge tank for recycle to zinc extraction. Prior to extraction of Zn, the recycled organic was treated with acid to lower its pH to 3.0.
EXAMPLE 2
Continuous SX Panel Runs
An SX panel, consisting of one extraction, two scrubs, one strip, and one acidification stage, was assembled for the continuous Zn SX runs using Aliquat 336 and actual geothermal brine. The analysis of the brine is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1______________________________________Analysis of Geothermal Brine Sample HRI 44786______________________________________Sample Description Some salt crystals and minor amount of tan-colored precipitate present in bottom of drums.______________________________________1. Quantitative assays Assay, g/LSample No. pH Sp. gr Zn Fe Mn Pb Cl______________________________________HRI-44786 2.5 1.244 .719 2.82 2.00 .136 218______________________________________2. XRF semi-quantitative assays g/L g/L______________________________________Cl 214 Cr .02Na 55 V .02Ca 36 W .02K 22 U .02Fe 2.4 Zr .02Mn 2.1 Cu .01Zn .7 Mo .01Sr .6 Si <.1Ba .3 Y <.005Pb .2 Al <.1Mg .2 S <.2Rb .1 Ti <.04Sn .09 P <.05As .04 Co <.005Th .03 Nb <.005 Ni <.005______________________________________3. XRF semi-quantitative assay ofcrystallized salts present in bottom of drum. % %______________________________________Cl 56 Cu .002Na 32 Mo .002Si .1 Y .002Ba .1 Al <.03Pb .07 S <.05Ca .03 Fe <.01K .03 Mg <.05Sn .02 Ti <.01Mn .01 P <.05Cr .007 Co <.001Th .007 Nb <.001As .005 Ni <.001V .005 Rb <.001W .005 Zn <.002Sr .004U .004Zr .003______________________________________
A. First Test Series
The conditions for these tests were as follows: The brine feed contained 0.71 g/L Zn, 2.7 g/L Fe, 2.1 g/L Mn; pH 2.5-3. The organic contained 10 vol % Aliquat 336+10 vol % Exxal 10 in Norpar 15. The scrub solution contained 5 g/L NaCl+3 g/L CaCl.sub.2, pH 2 (HCl). The strip solution contained 54 g/L NH.sub.3 +50 g/L CaCl.sub.2. Acidification was performed using 3N HCl feed solution, and 100 g/L NaCl/NH.sub.4 Cl solution recycle solution. The other conditions for the first set of four continuous SX runs and the assay results are summarized in Tables 2 through 4 below.
TABLE 2______________________________________Zn SX Data Summary Extraction Scrub Strip Acid'n______________________________________No. stages 1 2 1 1Flowrate, ml/minOrganic 110-130 110-130 110-130 110-130Feed aqueous 400-450 12-15 7-9 0.3-0.5Mixer O/A ratio 0.26 2 2 2Contact time, min 0.15-.3 1 3 1Temperature, .degree.C. 90-95 75-85 60-80 70-80______________________________________
TABLE 3______________________________________Run No. 5 6 7b 8______________________________________N2 blanket extract'n extract'n extract'n extract'n only only acid'n acid'nSO.sub.2 add'n scrub 1 + 2 scrub 1 scrub 1 scrub 1 and acid'n only only only 30 cc/min 30 cc/min 10 cc/min 10 cc/minExtract'n impeller impeller impeller in-clinemixerMix contact 16 sec 15 sec 15 sec 9 sectime______________________________________
TABLE 4______________________________________Zn SX Assay Data Summary______________________________________Run 5 6Assay, g/L pH Zn Fe pH Zn Fe______________________________________Extraction,Organic 1.88 .53 1.96 .54Raffinate 2.5 .14 2.7 .23% extracted 86.7 67.6Scrub 1,Organic 1.84 .058 2.01 .081Aqueous .5 .038 .7 .064Scrub 2,Organic 1.86 .01 1.88 .012Aqueous .7 .16 .8 .18Strip,Organic 1.29 .004 .028 .004Aqueous 8.3 35.3 34.7Acid'n,Organic 1.33 .007 .17 .005Aqueous 2.0 .03 .026Scum in extract'n yes somePpt in stripping heavy yesReagent additiong HCl per Lorganicg NH3 per Lorganic______________________________________Run 7b 8Assay, g/L pH Zn Fe pH Zn Fe______________________________________Extraction,Organic 2.07 .51 2.0 .5Raffinate 2.5 .19 3.2 .23% extracted 73.2 68Scrub 1,Organic 2.09 .048Aqueous .9 .062 (5.5) 1.3 .052Scrub 2,Organic 1.97 .009Aqueous 1.0 .22 1.4 .15Strip,Organic 0.21 .007Aqueous 10.6 26.8 9.7 26.2Acid'n,Organic .15 .005Aqueous .7 .006 6.7 .006Scum in extract'n trace tracePpt in stripping yes slightReagent additiong HCl/L organic 1.3 .87g NH.sub.3 /L organic 4.1 3.1______________________________________
These data show 68 to 87% Zn extraction in 15 second contact time at 90.degree. to 95.degree. C. using impeller mixing. With in-line mixing and nine-second contact time, 68% Zn extraction was obtained- Iron and Mn co-extraction were 0.4 to 0.55 g/L. Only trace amounts of Cu and Pb were co-extracted. The organic loadings were (in g/l) 1.9 to 2.1 Zn, 0.5 Fe, and 0.35 Mn.
The loaded organic was scrubbed in two countercurrent stages with 5 g/l NaCl+3 g/l CaCl.sub.2, pH 2 (HCl) solution plus some SO.sub.2 injected into the mixer(s) at 75.degree. to 85.degree. C. Greater than 98 and 99% of the Fe and Mn, respectively, were scrubbed. Less than 1% of the Zn was scrubbed from the organic. The scrubbed organic assayed (in g/l) 1.9 to 2.0 Zn, 0.01 Fe, <0.003 Mn, 0.007 Pb, and 0,001 Cu.
Contacting the scrubbed organic with 54 g/l NH.sub.3 plus 50 g/l CaCl.sub.2 for three minutes at 65.degree. to 75.degree. C. stripped 98 +% of the Zn. The strip solution assayed (in g/l) 27 to 35 Zn, about 44 NH.sub.3, 0,007 Cu, and <0.002 Fe, Mn, and Pb.
In the acidification stage, the stripped organic was neutralized with HCl before recycling. HCl required for neutralization ranged from 0,897 to 1.3 grams 100% HCl per liter organic or about 0.4 to 0.7 pounds 100% HCl per pound Zn. An estimated 50% of the acid required was due to the aqueous entrained in the organic.
Phase separation rates were rapid, less than 0.21 sq ft/gpm O+A in the extraction stage, and less than 0.7 sq ft/gpm O+A in the scrub, strip, and acidification stages.
In the last run (Run 8), no significant scum was formed in the extraction, scrub, and acidification stages. Some minor amount of precipitation (probably CaSO.sub.3) occurred in stripping.
B. Second Test Series
Five Zn SX runs using in-line mixing in extraction were performed. A second geothermal brine sample was used in these tests and assayed (in g/l) 0.53 Zn, 1.25 Fe, 1.34 Mn, 0.12 Pb, 0.0010 Ag, and pH 3 to 3.5. Other information on the content of the brine is provided in Table 5.
TABLE 5______________________________________Geothermal Brine compositionAverage concentrations for production brines, injectionbrines may be 10-20 percent higher, balance is water.______________________________________ Trace Elements (PPM)______________________________________Major Elements (percent)Chloride 13.5 Lead 100Sodium 6 Rubidium 100Calcium 3 Magnesium 40Potassium 1.5 Arsenic 15Minor Elements (PPM) Cesium 10Carbon Dioxide 2000 Hydrogen Sulfide 7Iron (Ferrous) 1000 Copper 5Manganese 930 Methane 3.0Strontium 430 Cadmium 1.2Ammonia 420 Antimony 0.9Lithium 410 Aluminum 0.7Zinc 370 Silver 0.4Boron 330 Chromium 0.2Silicon 250 Tin 0.2Barium 130 Selenium 0.2 Nickel 0.2 Bismuth 0.07 Beryllium 0.02 Radionuclides -- Radium 226 0.080 pCi Radon 222 0.810 pCi Lead 210 0.064 pCi Radium 228 0.064 pCi Thorium 228 --______________________________________
The effect of in-line mixing time on Zn extraction, a comparison of Zn extraction in one stage versus two countercurrent stages, and the effect of organic Zn loading on Zn extraction were screened in these runs.
The SX circuit was the same as used in previous runs except that the impeller-stirred mixer in the extraction stage was replaced by an in-line mixer. For the one stage extraction tests, the in-line mixer consisted of four 1.5 -cm diameter.times.122 cm glass tubes filled with five- or six-millimeter glass beads and connected in series. For the two countercurrent stage tests, two of the tubes were used per stage with a settler between the first and second stage.
The conditions of this test were as follows. The brine feed assayed in g/L: 0.53 Zn, 1.25 Fe, and 1.34 Mn at a pH 3-3.5. The organic contained 10 vol % Aliquat 336+10 vol % Exxal 10 in Norpar 15, recycled from previous runs. The scrub solutions were: 1) 5 g/L NaCL +3 g/L CaCl.sub.2, acidified to pH 2 with HCl and 2) raffinate diluted 1/40 with H.sub.2 O and acidified to pH 2 with HCl. The strip solution was 55 g/L NH.sub.3 +50 g/L CaCl.sub.2 . The stripped organic wash solutions were 1) 3N HCl feed solution, 100 g/L NaCl/NH.sub.4 Cl recycle solution, and 2) 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2.
Other conditions are summarized in Table 6 below.
TABLE 6______________________________________ No. of O/A ratio Temp. Stages in mixer .degree.C.______________________________________Scrub 2 2 80-90Strip 1 2 75-85S. organic wash 1 2 70-80______________________________________
The test results are summarized in Table 7 below.
TABLE 7______________________________________Run 9a 9b 10a 10b 11______________________________________Extract'n 1 1 2 2 2stagesFlowrate,ml/minOrganic 108 87 91 65 96Brine 404 427 433 438 426Scrub 10 11 11 9 9feed, aqStrip 6.4 6.5 6.7 6.2 6.7feed aqWash 0.75 0.66 0.80 0.62 9.0feed aqScrub sol'n NaCl. dil dil dil dil CaCl2 raff raff raff raffSO.sub.2 to yes no yes yes yesscrubS. organic acidic acidic acidic acidic neutralwash sol'n NaCl NaCl NaCl NaCl CaCl2Strip temp. 80-85 80 80 75 75deg C.Extract'n 25-50 25-50 25/stage 26/stage 25/stagetime, secRaffinate, .0845 .115 .030 .088 .022g/L ZnZn extracted 83.5 79 94 84 96L. organic,g/L Zn 1.66 1.89 2.31 2.67 2.31g/L Fe 0.265 0.2 0.21 0.19 0.26Scrubbed org. 0.006 0.013 0.039 0.037 0.046g/L FeFe scrubbed 98 94 81 81 82%HCl added, 0.51 0.44 0.42 0.39 0.09g/g ZnNH3 added, 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.0 1.7g/g Zn______________________________________
These test results show the following:
1. Zn Extraction
With one extraction stage, Zn extractions in 25- and 50-second contact time were the same (an average of 83.5%) with an organic loading of 1.7 g/l Zn (Run 9a). Increasing the organic loading, to 1.9 g/l Zn, decreased Zn extraction to approximately 79% (Run 9b) .
With two countercurrent stages and 25-second contact per stage, Zn extraction increased to about 95% with organic loadings of 2.3 g/l Zn (Runs 10a and 11). Increasing the organic loading, to 2.7 g/l Zn, decreased Zn extraction to 84% (Run 10b).
2. Fe Extraction and Scrub
Fe loadings on the organics ranged from 0.18 to 0.28 g/l. Scrubbing with 5 g/l NaCl+3 g/l CaCl.sub.2 (pH 2) solution appears to be more effective in removing Fe from the loaded organic (98 %, Run 9a) than diluted, pH 2 raffinate (81%, Run 10a). About 0.5% of the extracted Zn reported in the spent scrub solution (Run 11). SO.sub.2 appears to be helpful in scrubbing, in that less Fe precipitation occurred when SO.sub.2 was used. There was no precipitation when the spent scrub solution from Run 11 was added to the extraction raffinate.
3. Stripping
Greater than 99% Zn stripping was achieved at 75.degree. to 80.degree. C. with 55 g/l NH.sub.3 +50 g/l CaCl.sub.2 solution. The strip solution boiled at 85.degree. C.
Pregnant strip solution assays were 27 to 28 g/l Zn and 40 to 45 g/l NH.sub.3 (ratio NH.sub.3 /Zn=1.6).
NH.sub.3 addition averaged 1.8 pounds NH.sub.3 per pound Zn extracted (Runs 10a, 10b, 11).
Residual Fe left in the scrubbed organic reported in the strip solution as a rust-colored gelatinous precipitate which did not filter well. About 0.05 grams dry precipitate solids were formed per liter feed brine. Run 10+11 precipitate assayed 12% Zn, 22% Fe, 7.1% Ca, 2.5% Pb, and <0.05 oz/ton Ag. The precipitate contained 1.2% of the total Zn fed to SX.
4. HCl Consumption
HCl required to neutralize the stripped organic decreased from 0.4 to 0.09 pound HCl per pound Zn extracted when the stripped organic was washed with neutral 50 g/l CaCl.sub.2 solution before recycle to extraction (Run 10a versus Run 11). In Run 11, HCl was added to the brine feed to maintain the raffinate at pH 3.0 to 3.4.
5. SX Run 11
The best overall results were obtained in Run 11. Conditions and results for this run are given in Tables 8-10 respectively.
The SX circuit of the present invention was performed under the following conditions reported below and in Table 8. For the in-line mixer, each stage consisted of two 1.5 cm diameter.times.122 cm glass tubes filled with 5 or 6 mm glass beads, steam jacketed. Total void space was 216 cc per stage. O/A flow was an upflow through the in-line mixer. The feed solutions included the organic: 10 vol % Aliquat 336 and 10 vol % Exxal 10 in Norpar 15. The feed brine (sample 45235) was treated with 25 g Fe/150 L brine, and kept under nitrogen. Brine was passed through a filter containing Fe powder, then hot through a column of Fe wool. The pH adjustment was made with about 10 g/L HCl added to the brine to maintain a raffinate pH of 3.0-3.4. The scrub solution was raffinate diluted with water, adjusted to pH 2 with HCl. The strip solution was 55 g/L NH.sub.3 and 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2. The Stripped organic wash solution was 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2. SO.sub.2 was added by sparging 10-15 cc/minute gaseous SO.sub.2 into scrub 1 mixer.
TABLE 8______________________________________ Stripped Organic Extraction Scrub Strip Wash______________________________________Run time, min. 345No. stages 2 2 1 1Org. vol., L 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0Feed Aq vol, L 147 3.0 2.32 3.13HCl vol, L .655Flowrate, ml/minOrganic 96 96 96 96Aq feed 426 8.7 6.72 9.07Aq recycle 0 39 41 39Total 522 143 143 143Mixer vol, ml 216 140 450 140Settler vol, ml 1000 1000 1000 1000diam., cm 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1area, sqft .031 .031 .031 .031mix time, min .41 1.0 3.1 1.0SettlingTime, min (O + A) 1.9 7.0 7.0 7.0Rate, sqft/gpm .23 .83 .83 .83(O + A)Temp, deg. C. 86-96 79-88 75 70pH 3.0-3.4 1.9 9.9 9.9Scum formed slight slight______________________________________
The following reagent addition occurred before assays were performed for the amounts of minerals and reagents at various stages (reported in Table 9 below): HCl in pH adjustment: 19.8 ml 0.27N HCl/L organic or 0.20 g 100% HCl/L organic; NH.sub.3 in stripping: 70.3 ml 55 g/L NH.sub.3 /L organic or 3.8 g 100% NH.sub.3 /L organic.
TABLE 9______________________________________Assays pH Zn Fe Mn NH.sub.3 Ca Ag Pb______________________________________Brine 3.2 .500 1.36 (1.34) .0010 .120feedProfilesamples,end ofrunExtr'n,barrenstgOrganic .76 .54Raff. 3.1 .022 1.28 .0007 .117Extr'npreg stgOrganic 2.31 .26Raff. 2.6 .18Scrub,stg 1Organic 2.32 .052Aq 1.8 .089 3.81 <.0005 .021Scrub,stg 2Organic 2.29 .046Aq 1.9 .25 .32 <.0005 .028StripOrganic .015 .023Aq 9.9 28.5 40.4 <.0005 .002S. orgwashOrganic .003 .004Aq 9.9 .41 3.7 <.0005 .002Com-positesRaff. 3.2 .025Scrub 1.4 .13solnStrip soln 10.0 29.4 44.3S.org 8.8 .57 4.9washStrip 12.0 22.3 7.07 <.05 2.45solids gpt(2 runs;14.7 g)______________________________________
The amount of zinc recovered at each stage is reported in Table 10 below.
TABLE 10______________________________________ Amount Zn Assay g Zn Zn Dist. %______________________________________Feed brine 147 L .500 g/L 73.5Strip soln 2.32 L 29.4 g/L 68.2 93.2Raffinate 147 L .025 g/L 3.7 5.0Scrub soln 3.00 L .13 g/L .4 .5Strip ppt 7.4 g 12% .9 1.2 73.2 100______________________________________
Each stage consisted of two 1.5 cm diameter glass tubes (122 cm) filled with 5 or 6 mm glass beads which are steam jacketed. The total void space is 216 cc per stage upflow through the in-line mixer. Run time was about 345 minutes.
The scrub solution was made up of raffinate from a previous run diluted 1/40 with H.sub.2 O, and the pH adjusted to 2 with HCl. The strip solution was 55 g/L NH.sub.3 and 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2. The strip organic wash solution was 50 g/L CaCl.sub.2. Between 10-15 cc/min. of gaseous SO.sub.2 was sparged into the scrub 1 mixer.
The feed brine from a continuous panel SX test was assayed and found to contain 1 mg/L Ag and less than 0.5 mg/L Ag (reported in the strip solution). This corresponds to a Ag/Zn ratio=<0.0005/29. A trace amount of Pb (2 mg/L Pb) was found in the Zn strip solution. Most of the Pb (extracted and entrained) appears to have been scrubbed from the organic and precipitated with the Fe during stripping.
The following data are of particular interest. The zinc extracted in two countercurrent stages was 95.6%; feed and raffinate assays were 0.50 and 0.022 g/l Zn, respectively. The loaded organic assayed 2.31 g/l Zn and 0.26 g/l Fe. After two countercurrent scrub stages with diluted pH 2 raffinate, the scrubbed organic assayed 2.29 g/l Zn and 0,046 g/l Fe. Eighty-two percent of the Fe and 0.5% of the Zn were scrubbed from the organic. About 0.4 liter SO.sub.2 per liter organic was injected into the first scrub mixer to maintain reducing conditions during the scrub. In one stripping stage with 55 g/l NH.sub.3 plus 50 CaCl.sub.2 solution at 75.degree. C., 99+% Zn stripping was achieved producing a pregnant strip containing (in g/l) 28.5 Zn, 40.4 NH.sub.3 (total), 0,002 Pb, <0.0005 Ag, and pH 9.9. NH.sub.3 added in stripping was 3.8 grams 100% NH.sub.3 per liter organic or 1.65 grams per gram Zn stripped.
The residual Fe in the scrubbed organic formed a gelatinous Fe hydrate precipitate in the strip solution. This precipitate did not cause any apparent phase separation problem. Washing the stripped organic with 50 g/l CaCl.sub.2 solution removed the entrained NH.sub.3 from the organic. The amount of HCl added to the feed brine to maintain pH 3 in extraction was 0.20 grams 100% HCl per liter organic or 0.087 grams 100% HCl per gram Zn extracted. The feed brine assayed 1 mg/L Ag and less than 0.5 mg/L Ag reported in the strip solution. A trace amount of lead (2 mg/L Pb) was reported in the strip solution. Most of the Pb appears to have been scrubbed from the organic and the rest precipitated with the residual Fe during stripping. The Fe precipitate assayed 2.5% Pb, equivalent to about 5 mg/L Pb in the scrubbed organic.
6. Organic Stability
Infrared scans of Run 8 and 11 organics and fresh organic were the same, indicating that no significant change in chemical composition occurred in about ten organic cycles.
7. Organic Solubility
Soluble amine, Exxal 10, and Norpar 15 were determined by the freon extraction-chromatographic method in the aqueous samples from Run 11 as shown in Table 11.
TABLE 11______________________________________ Assay, mg/LSample Amine Exxal 10 Norpar 15______________________________________Raffinate <0.2 <0.1 <0.2Fe scrub solution 18 0.7 <0.2Strip solution 41 3.0 <0.2Organic wash solution 41 3.7 <0.2______________________________________
EXAMPLE 3
Removal of Fe and Mn from Geothermal Brines by Scrubbing
Shakeout tests using actual geothermal brine samples showed Fe and Mn are co-extracted with Zn. Various methods of minimizing their extraction were tested.
A. Zn Extraction
A zinc extraction was performed using a geothermal brine (GTB) sample containing the following elements, at pH 4.3:
______________________________________ g/L______________________________________ Zn .73 Fe, total 2.59 Fe.sup.+3 <.01 Mn .24 Pb .13 Si 224 Cl 0.04______________________________________
An organic containing 10% v/v Aliquat 336 and 10% v/v Exxal 10 in Norpar 15 which had been conditioned through one extraction, strip and scrub cycle was assayed.
This GTB was contacted with the organic in a resin kettle (RK) or a sealed bottle (Btl) under N.sub.2 at a temperature of 88.degree.-92.degree. C. The A/O ratio was 3.3-3.5/1. The results of these tests are shown in Table 12 and illustrate that Zn powder reduced Fe in the organic phase.
TABLE 12______________________________________Test 1 2 3 4 5______________________________________GTB pretreatment none NaHS Zn Zn Fewith powder coarse powderContacted in RK RK Btl Btl BtlTime, min. 2 3 2 0.5 0.5Organic, g/L Zn 2.14 1.95 2.33 2.80 2.07Fe 0.49 0.51 0.56 0.25 0.40Mn 0.27 0.17Raffinate, g/L Zn 0.11pH 3.0 4.0 2.8 3.5 3.6______________________________________
Both Fe and Mn are partially co-extracted with Zn from untreated geothermal brine by Aliquat 336. Pretreating the brine with NaHS and Zn or Fe powder to make certain all the Fe was reduced to Fe.sup.+2 did not significantly decrease Fe extraction.
B. Fe and Mn Scrub From Organic
Fe and Mn scrub tests using dilute HCl, NaCl, and CaCl.sub.2 solutions are summarized in Tables 13 and 14 below. A dilute chloride solution containing (in g/l) 5 NaCl, 2 CaCl.sub.2, and 0.2 HCl selectively scrubbed Fe and Mn from Zn-loaded Aliquat 336 organic.
The feed organic was made up of 10% v/v Aliquat 336 and 10% v/v Exxal 10 in Norpar 15, and was contacted with geothermal brine. An X-ray fluorescence assay revealed a composition of 2.02 g/L Zn, 0.42 g/L Fe, and 0.27 g/L Mn. The scrub solutions were prepared from reagent grade NaCl, CaCl.sub.2 and HCl. Contact was made in sealed 8 oz. bottles for 5 min. at a temperature of between 85.degree.-89.degree. C. The O/A ratio was 1.2/1.
These results illustrate that without salt concentrations or reasonable amounts of acid, emulsification occurs.
TABLE 13______________________________________Test 1 2 3 4______________________________________Scrub solnHCl, g/L 3.7 .37 .37 .22NaCl, g/L 0 100 0 5.0CaCl.sub.2, g/L 0 40 0 2.0Phase break OK OK emulsion OKOrganic clear clear formed clearAqueous clear clear slt. cldyScum no no noAssays, g/LS. organic, Fe .17 .37 .05Zn 1.76 2.01 1.80Mn <0.3S. soln, Fe .27 .030 .5Zn .39 .029 .2Mn .3% scrubbed, Fe 56 11 82Zn 16 1 8Mn >88Dist. coefficientK A/O, Fe 1.6 .1 10Zn .22 .01 .11Mn >10Separation factor 7 6 90Fe/Zn______________________________________
TABLE 14__________________________________________________________________________Fe and Mn Scrubbing with Dilute Acidified NaCl + CaCl2 Solution__________________________________________________________________________Organic 10 vol % Aliquat 336 + 10 vol % Exxal 10 in Norpar 15. Loaded by contacting with Geothermal brine to (in g/L) 2.09 Zn, .72 Fe, .37 MnScrub soln 5.0 g/L NaCl + 2.0 g/L CaCl.sub.2, pH 2.0 W/HClContact Time 2 minO/A ratio 2/1Temperature 85-90.degree. C.Method Scrub soln contacted three times with fresh portions of loaded organic.__________________________________________________________________________ Dist. Coeff. Assay, g/L K a/o- Sep'n FactorContact Sample Fe Mn Zn Fe Mn Zn Fe/Zn Mn/Zn__________________________________________________________________________ Loaded .72 .37 2.09 organic1 Scrub soln 1.03 .82 .15 5.15 410 .077 67 5330 Scrubbed organic .20 .002 1.952 Scrub soln 1.97 1.98 .12 7.04 990 .057 124 17408 Scrubbed organic .28 .002 2.113 Scrub soln 2.83 2.86 .12 9.76 953 .057 170 16604 Scrubbed organic .29 .003 2.09__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 4
Varying the Aqueous to Organic Ratio
A series of solvent extractions were conducted at several power plants to optimize the Zn extraction step of the SX circuit of this invention. An exemplary analysis of the aqueous to organic ratio (A/O) by volume percent for Zn extraction at one plant is shown in Table 15 below.
TABLE 15______________________________________Zinc Solvent Extraction Summary of ResultsTest No. A/O Ratio % Zinc Extraction______________________________________1 3.3 94.02 3.7 93.83 3.5 93.64 3.7 89.35 2.5 NA *6 3.7 NA *7 5.9 65.98 4.5 84.29 2.6 94.610 3.89 90.2______________________________________ * Note: Not Available
Other power plants showed similar relationships between A/O ratios and % Zn extraction.
EXAMPLE 5
Zn Strip Assay From Aliquat 336 with NH.sub.4 Cl
The following example illustrates that the methods of the prior art, e.g., extraction with NH.sub.4 Cl and acid does not successfully strip Zn from the brine.
The feed organic was made up of 10% v/v Aliquat 336 ad 10% v/v Exxal 10 in Norpar 15, 2.16 g/L Zn. A strip solution of varying amounts of NH.sub.4 Cl in 0.1N HCl was used. Contact was made in a baffled beaker at a temperature of 80.degree.-85.degree. C. for five minutes. The O/A ratio was 2/1. The test results are illustrated in Table 16 below.
TABLE 16______________________________________ Strip soln Zn % ZnTest g/L NH.sub.4 Cl Sample pH g/L stripped______________________________________ Feed organic 2.161 50 S. organic 2.06 S. soln 1.9 .054 1.22 250 S. organic 1.92 S. soln 1.4 .14 3.23 400 S. organic 1.90 S. soln 1.9 .24 5.6______________________________________
EXAMPLE 6
Na.sub.2 S.sub.4 Strip is not Desirable
Tests were conducted to determine if an Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 Zn strip solution would be preferable to the ammoniacal CaCl.sub.2 solution used in this invention.
These experiments included 3 stages of extraction and the same number of stages for stripping and regeneration (locked cycle). All the contact times were maintained at 5 minutes for extraction, stripping and regeneration. Settling times were set at 15 minutes. The aqueous to organic ratios varied according to the objective of the test. The reagents used for extraction, stripping and regeneration were: Adogen-464 (10 percent by volume), sodium sulfate, and sodium chloride, each at 10 percent weight solution.
In order to evaluate the extraction kinetics for extraction, agitated solvent extraction tests were conducted at 2 and 5 minutes contact time. Zinc recovered was calculated by difference between the feed and raffinate solutions.
Most of the solvent extraction experiments were performed using a quaternary ammonium compound as the extractant, (Adogen 464). Only one other extractant was tested, a secondary amine, Amberlite LA-2 made by Rohm & Haas. The test conditions were similar to those used with the Adogen 464 extractant with the appropriate amounts of modifier (10 volume percent) and diluent (80 volume percent).
In some cases the stripped organic had to be regenerated with a sodium chloride or hydrochloric acid solution to avoid transfer to sulfate or hydroxide ions into the extraction stage.
An important aspect for extraction of zinc with a quaternary ammonium compound was the evaluation of various reagents for stripping. A list of the stripping agents tested is provided below:
______________________________________Stripping Solution Regenerating Solution______________________________________1. Sodium Sulfate (10% WT) Sodium Chloride (10% WT)2. Ammonium Chloride/Ammonia Hydrochloric Acid (1.5M) (5% WT)3. Distilled Water4. Concentrated Hydrochloric Sodium Chloride Acid5. Hydrochloric Acid (18% WT)6. Sodium Sulfate/Ammonia Sodium Chloride______________________________________
The solvent extraction experiments conducted to evaluate the performance of the reagents for stripping, were designed to increase the zinc concentrations in the strip solution. In order to accomplish an increase in zinc concentration in the strip solution, the organic was contacted with fresh brine at a volume phase ratio of 4.1 parts of aqueous to 1 part of organic in three different stages. Each extraction stage was followed by locked cycle stripping at a volume phase ratio of 1.25 parts of strip solution to 1 part of organic. The regeneration stage (when necessary) was conducted at a volume phase ratio of 2.5 parts of regeneration solution to 1 part of organic.
Extraction of zinc was conducted under strong agitation and temperatures of approximately 80 degrees Celsius for contact times ranging from 1 to 5 minutes. Stripping and regeneration stages were conducted at ambient temperature with contact times ranging from 1 to 5 minutes. The settling times allowed for phase separation ranged from 3 to 15 minutes.
The following parameters were specific for each extraction, stripping, and regeneration stage:
______________________________________Solvent Extraction StageConditions Extraction Stripping Regeneration______________________________________A/O Ratio: 3/1 2.5/1 2.5/1Contact Time 5 minutes 5 minutes 5 minutesSettling Time 15 minutes 15 minutes 15 minutes______________________________________
The temperature was maintained at 85 to 90 degrees Celsium during extraction. The pH of the reduced brine was adjusted to 3.5 to 4.0. The extractant contained 10 volume percent of a quaternary ammonium compound, 10 volume percent of decyl alcohol as modifier and 80 volume percent of diluent Norpar 15 made by Exxon. The reagents used for stripping and regeneration were 10 percent solutions by weight of sodium sulfate and sodium chloride respectively.
Regeneration of the organic is deemed necessary to prevent sulfate transport into the brine. In this experiment, zinc extractions were fairly high at approximately 84 to 87 percent.
In an attempt to build-up the strip solution zinc concentration, the aqueous to organic ratio was changed to 1.25 to 1 for stripping. Each extraction cycle was followed by locked cycle stripping and regeneration. A total of 3 cycles per test were conducted in each experiment for strip reagent evaluation. The following Table 17 summarizes the results obtained in the stripping reagents evaluation.
TABLE 17______________________________________Summary of Results Stripping Reagents Evaluation Strip SolutionStripping Zn Analyses Percent ZnReagent (gram/liter) Stripped______________________________________Sodium sulfate 3.16 37.27.sup.1(10% WT)1.5 M NH.sub.4 Cl1.5 M NH.sub.3 3.08 39.72.sup.2Hydrochloric 2.28 58.81.sup.3Acid (37% WT)Hydrochloric 0.50 6.52.sup.4Acid (18% WT)Water N/A N/A.sup.5(Distilled)1.5 M Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 10.72 N/A.sup.61.5 M NH.sub.3______________________________________ .sup.1 Stripping efficiency drops due to chloride transfer. .sup.2 Hydroxyl is loaded during stripping. .sup.3 Third phase occurred. .sup.4 Not effective. .sup.5 Formed emulsions at O/A ratios of 5 or lower. .sup.6 A metal balance was not conducted in this test. The main objective was to buildup the zinc concentration in the strip solution.
The results tabulated above indicate that none of the reagents tested was particularly effective for stripping zinc. The maximum zinc concentration achieved was approximately 3 grams per liter. A higher strip liquor concentration was achieved with a sodium sulfate/ammonia solution of 10.7 gram per liter zinc but the efficiency of stripping was low; i.e., multistage contacts would be required.
Transfer of chloride into the strip solution lowered the efficiency for stripping in most cases. A low efficiency in stripping affected significantly the zinc extraction efficiency by lowering the capacity of the extractant. Maximum loading for the organic was determined to be approximately 4.8 gram per liter zinc at brine levels of about 700 ppm Zn.sup.+2. The efficiency in the extraction stage decreased as the strip efficiency also decreased in locked cycle stripping. After 3 cycles of extraction, stripping and regeneration, organic residual loadings as high as 2.9 gram per liter zinc were observed following stripping stage. Maximum stripping liquor loads of only 3.2 gpl were in equilibrium with the organic phase. The zinc recoveries observed in the tests conducted were in the 60 to 70 percent range with an organic that had been through at least one cycle of extraction, stripping and regeneration. Higher extractions were achieved in the first cycle when barren organic was used. Stripping with ammonium chloride/ammonia formed emulsions and phase disengagement was slow. These emulsions were caused mainly by precipitation of iron hydroxides. Emulsification may not occur if iron is not co-extracted with zinc.
Ammonium chloride/ammonia 1.5M solution proved to be effective as a stripping reagent at full strength. The efficiency in stripping decreases with chloride and zinc transfer. Titration of the organic after ammonium chloride-ammonia strip indicated that the organic contained up to 4.4 gram per liter hydroxyl ion. This base would have to be neutralized prior to sending the organic to extraction or regeneration stages. If organic is not regenerated after ammonia strip, precipitation of iron will occur during the extraction stage.
Stripping with concentrated hydrochloric acid caused third phase formation. In order to avoid third phase, 18 percent weight hydrochloric acid was used. At this concentration, the reagent is no longer effective as a stripping agent. A washing stage (with NaCl) was needed to strip the acid loaded onto the organic prior to subsequent zinc extraction.
Stripping with water was effective only at a volume phase ratio of 10 to 20 parts of organic to 1 part of aqueous. The zinc concentration of the strip solution at both 10 and 20 organic to aqueous ratios, after 1 cycle was 2.1 gram per liter zinc. Good phase separation was obtained only at low aqueous to organic ratios but an increase in zinc concentration was not obtained. The lower loading results may be skewed by the kinetics of Zn.sup.+2 transfer being limited at such low aqueous ratios. There were no indications of sulfate transport into the raffinate after zinc extraction. The brine fed into the system as well as the products obtained from the solvent extraction circuit all showed concentrations of less than 0.005 gram per liter sulfate. However, chloride transfer to the sodium sulfate salt makes its use not economically feasible.
Numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are included in the above-identified specification and are expected to be obvious to one of skill in the art. Such modifications and alterations to the compositions and processes of the present invention are believed to be encompassed in the scope of the claims appended hereto.

Number	Name	Date
3923976	Vega et al.	Dec 1976
4602820	Hard	Jul 1986
4624704	Byeseda	Nov 1986
4710367	Wong et al.	Dec 1987

Method of extracting zinc from brines

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

US Referenced Citations (4)

Non-Patent Literature Citations (12)