Method of fabricating a light-guide optical element

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 12135445
  • Patent Number
    12,135,445
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, April 14, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 5, 2024
    3 months ago
Abstract
A method of fabricating a light-guide optical element having a plurality of partially reflecting surfaces is disclosed. The method includes providing a plurality of transparent plates, each plate polished on two opposite surfaces such that the surfaces are parallel to each other, coating a first of the surfaces of a subset of plates with a first coating, coating a second of the surfaces of the subset of plates with a second coating; bonding together the plurality of transparent plates to form a stack, and cutting the stack along parallel planes obliquely angled to the faces of the transparent plates so as to form the optical element, wherein the first coating is a partially reflective coating have a first set of mechanical properties, and the second coating is selected from the group consisting of: a coating similar to the first coating and a non-reflective coating having a second set of mechanical properties substantially similar to the first set of mechanical properties.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The presently disclosed subject matter relates to a light-guide optical element, and, more particularly, to methods of fabricating a light-guide optical element.


BACKGROUND

Certain head-mounted displays (HMD) employ a light-guide optical element (“LOE”), also called a waveguide, that operates by trapping light waves inside a substrate by total internal reflections from the external surfaces of the waveguide. The light waves which are trapped inside the waveguide are coupled out by an array of partially reflective surfaces. The internal surfaces of the waveguide are typically made by joining a number of transparent flat plates. Prior to joining the plates, the plates are typically coated on one surface with a thin film partially reflective coating. In order to maintain image quality, the plates should be as flat as possible. However, the thin film and/or the coating process can impose stress on the plates and cause the plates to warp, leading to undesired curvature of the plates and a degradation of the quality of an image delivered by the LOE.


SUMMARY

According to one aspect of the presently disclosed subject matter there is provided a method of fabricating a light-guide optical element having a plurality of partially reflecting surfaces. The method includes providing a plurality of transparent plates, each plate polished on two opposite surfaces such that the surfaces are parallel to each other; coating a first of the surfaces of a subset of plates with a first coating: coating a second of the surfaces of the subset of plates with a second coating; bonding together the plurality of transparent plates to form a stack: and cutting the stack along parallel planes obliquely angled to the faces of the transparent plates so as to form the optical element; wherein the first coating is a partially reflective coating having a first set of mechanical properties, and the second coating is selected from the group consisting of: a coating similar to the first coating and a non-reflective coating having a second set of mechanical properties substantially similar to the first set of mechanical properties.


According to another aspect of the presently disclosed subject matter there is provided a light-guide optical element having at least one pair of parallel external surfaces including a plurality of partially reflecting surfaces made from a plurality of transparent plates having surfaces that are non-parallel to the pair of parallel external surfaces, each plate polished on two opposite surfaces such that the surfaces are parallel to each other; wherein each plate in a subset of plates is coated on one surface with a first coating and coated on the second surface with a second coating, wherein the first coating is a partially reflective coating having a first set of mechanical properties, and the second coating is selected from the group consisting of: a coating similar to the first coating and a non-reflective coating having a second set of mechanical properties substantially similar to the first set of mechanical properties.


According to some aspects of the presently disclosed subject matter the subset of plates is comprised of alternate plates in the plurality of plates, and the second coating is a coating similar to the first coating. At least one plate of the plurality of plates can be coated on a first surface with the first coating and on a second surface with a non-reflective coating having the second set of mechanical properties.


According to some aspects of the presently disclosed subject matter the subset of plates is comprised of all plates in the plurality of plates, and the second coating is a non-reflective coating having a second set of mechanical properties substantially similar to the first set of mechanical properties.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In order to understand the invention and to see how it can be carried out in practice, embodiments will be described, by way of non-limiting examples, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1A illustrates a side view of a LOE according to the prior art:



FIG. 1B illustrates an isometric view of a LOE according to the prior art;



FIG. 1C illustrates a method of manufacture of a LOE according to the prior art;



FIG. 2A illustrates a method of manufacturing a LOE according to a first embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter;



FIG. 2B illustrates a particularly preferred method of manufacturing a LOE according to the first embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter;



FIG. 3 illustrates a method of manufacturing a LOE according to a second embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter;



FIG. 4A illustrates a stack cut along parallel planes according to a first embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter;



FIG. 4B illustrates a stack cut along parallel planes according to a second embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter;



FIG. 5A illustrates an alternative stack to FIG. 4A, cut along parallel planes according to a second embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter:



FIG. 5B illustrates an alternative stack to FIG. 4B, cut along parallel planes according to a second embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter: and



FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate an embodiment of a single-side coating according to yet another embodiment of the presently disclosed subject matter.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the presently disclosed subject matter may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known methods, procedures, and components have not been described in detail so as not to obscure the presently disclosed subject matter.


Bearing this in mind, reference is now made to FIGS. 1A-1C, where there is illustrated a LOE made according to the prior art. FIG. 1A illustrates a side view of a LOE 8 having a plurality of plates 4 and a plurality of partially reflective internal surfaces 2. FIG. 1B illustrates an isometric view of LOE 8. FIG. 1C illustrates a prior art method of manufacture of LOE 8 in which each plate 4, prior to joining, is coated on one surface with a thin film partially reflective coating 12. As further illustrated in FIGS. 4A-4B, in which alternative prior art methods are shown, the plates are then bonded together to form a stack 6, and the stack sliced along parallel planes 16 to form LOE 8.


Typically, the partially reflective coating imposes a certain amount of stress on the surface to which it is applied. When applied to one surface of each plate and not the other, this stress can lead to the plate warping, creating an undesired curvature in the plate, which in turn can lead to the LOE propagating a poor quality image. The amount of warping is generally determined by the mechanical properties of the particular coating, e.g. the stress characteristics of the thin film coating, and/or as a result of the coating process. For example, the coating materials can have inherent properties that relate to stress caused in the coated film. These properties include a directional stress property, which can be, for example, tensile or compressive. The stress can be caused by different expansion coefficients under temperature change of the various coating layers and/or materials, or between the coating and the plate.


The inventors have found a way to mitigate the negative effects of stress on a plate caused by the partially reflective coating, thereby reducing the amount of warping or eliminating it altogether. Specifically, according to certain particularly preferred implementations of the present invention, some or all of the plates are coated on opposing surfaces with coatings that have similar stress characteristics, as will be more fully detailed below.


Referring now to FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3, there are illustrated two methods of fabricating a LOE of the present invention in accordance with certain embodiments of the presently disclosed subject matter. Both methods initially provide a plurality of transparent plates 10, where each plate has been polished on two opposite surfaces such that the opposite surfaces are parallel to one another. For purposes of clarity, in the foregoing description, the two opposite surfaces may sometimes be referred to as the “left” and “right” surfaces. It should be understood that for the purposes of the invention these descriptive designations are meant only to differentiate the two opposing surfaces for the purpose of the present description, but are not in any way indicative of any particular order and/or optical properties of the plates either during processing or in the final product.


As shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3, a first coating, being a partially reflective coating 12, is then coated onto one of the surfaces of at least some of the plates 10 (referred to herein as a “subset” of the plates). In FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3 the plates in the subset are indicated as 10′. By way of example, FIGS. 2A, 2B and 3 show the partially reflective coating 12 applied to the left surface of plates 10′. A second coating, which depending on the particular embodiment can be either the same coating or a different coating, is then coated onto the second surface of plates 10′, as will be detailed below.


In certain embodiments, some LOEs may require different amounts of reflectivity in the different plates. Therefore, the reference to a “first coating” or “partially reflective coating” should be taken to refer to one coating from a group of coatings which are all partially reflective but may vary in their respective reflective parameters. In certain embodiments, the reflective parameters can be progressively changed for each subsequent surface according to the specific LOE design requirements.


In a first embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 2A, the subset of plates is composed of alternating plates, and each plate 10′ in the subset is coated on both the left and right surfaces with the partially reflective coating 12. The remaining plates are not coated. Since coated plates are coated on both sides with similar coatings, any coating-induced stress imposed on such plates is imposed equally on both opposing surfaces, thereby reducing or eliminating the warping effect. It should be understood that “similar” coatings refer to coatings of similarly imposing stress that may or may not be fabricated with the same compositions, number of layers, and total thickness.


It should be noted that, as shown in FIGS. 4A-4B, plates are joined together to form the LOE, therefore there is no need to coat every plate with the partially reflective coating, i.e. it makes no difference to the optical properties which plate, as between two adjoining plates, has the coating. Therefore, the inventors have found it advantageous to apply the partially reflective coating to both surfaces of every other plate, and no coating on the other plates. This way, any deviation in the flatness of a plate caused by the coating is balanced by a likewise deviation on the other side, reducing or eliminating the overall curvature of the plate. In addition, the plates can be coated on both sides simultaneously.


In certain particularly preferred embodiments, and as shown in FIG. 2B, in cases where there are an uneven number of optically active surfaces, plate 10″ (which could be the last plate as shown in FIG. 2B, or it can alternatively be a plate positioned anywhere in the stack) is coated on one surface with the partially reflective coating 12 and on the opposing surface with a neutralizing coating 14, as will be further detailed below with reference to the second embodiment as shown in FIG. 3.


The partially reflective coatings are preferably implemented as multi-layer dielectric coatings with layers having alternating high and low (and possibly also an intermediate value) refractive indices, and with differing layer thicknesses, where the thicknesses and layer properties are chosen according to algorithms to provide the desired optical properties, all as is known in the art, and as can be derived using standard software tools known in the art. Similarly, the second coating is preferably implemented using the same approach and technology, but where the defined optical properties are those of an anti-reflective coating for all relevant angles. The anti-reflective properties could typically be achieved with a smaller number of layers than the partially reflective coatings but are preferably implemented using the same number of layers as the partially-reflective coating in order to achieve the similar mechanical properties, as discussed further below.


In a second embodiment, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the subset of plates is composed of all plates, and each plate 10′ in the subset is coated on the first surface (e.g. show as the left surface in FIG. 3) with the partially reflective coating 12, and is coated on the second surface (e.g. show as the right surface in FIG. 3) with a neutralizing coating 14. The neutralizing coating 14 has no discernable effect on the transmission of light (i.e. is non-reflective), but has mechanical properties, namely stress characteristics, substantially similar to the partially reflective coating 12. Therefore, with the application of the neutralizing coating 14 on the other surface (i.e. the surface without coating 12) substantially equivalent stress is imposed on both surfaces of each coated plate, thereby reducing or eliminating the warping effect. In this embodiment, while each plate is coated, the plates are coated on both sides with coatings that have equivalent stress characteristics. As a result, similar to the first embodiment, any deviation in the flatness of a plate caused by the coating is balanced by an equal deviation on the other side, reducing or eliminating the overall curvature of the plate.


In certain embodiments, the neutralizing coating 14 is an anti-reflective coating, as mentioned. In certain particularly preferred implementations, the anti-reflective coating is a coating of similar layer compositions and number of layers as the partially reflective coating but applied with thicknesses chosen to produce anti-reflective optical properties. In many cases, the use of the same number of layers with the same compositions, just with different thicknesses, provides a sufficiently similar stress effect to reduce any residual warping of the plates to acceptable levels. However, the use of different layer compositions and/or numbers of layers for the “stress-neutralizing” coating also falls within the scope of the present invention.


In certain embodiments, the partially reflective coating and the neutralizing coating can be applied to a plate simultaneously. In certain embodiments, after applying the coatings, the plates can warp and then get corrected. In certain embodiments, the stress is caused by the coating process and/or during cooling after the coating is applied.


It should be noted that by “substantially similar” mechanical properties, it is meant that the mechanical properties are sufficiently similar that warping of the plates is reduced, and preferably eliminated. In many cases, there will in fact be differences in layer thickness between the coatings on the two sides of the plate, either to achieve slightly different proportions of reflectance/transmittance and/or to achieve anti-reflective properties, but the use of similar sequences of coatings, particularly where the number of layers and their compositions are the same, have been found in many cases to be “substantially similar” to the extent that they achieve a sufficiently high degree of stress cancellation for a high quality product.


Referring now to FIGS. 4A-4B, as in the prior art methods, in both of the above described embodiments, the LOE 8 is then formed by bonding together the plates to form a stack 6, and cutting the stack along parallel planes 16 obliquely angled to the faces of the plates so as to form the optical element. In certain embodiments, the plates could be bonded in an adhesive-free bonding process, such as anodic bonding.


In some embodiments, as shown in FIG. 4A, the plates can be stacked without angling, in which case the stack 6 is cut along parallel planes that are angled relative to the surfaces of the plates. In other embodiments, as shown in FIG. 4B, the plates themselves are angled in the stack, in which case the stack 6 is cut straight. In some embodiments (not shown), the stack can be cut along additional planes, e.g. to form a two-dimensional waveguide.


Referring to FIGS. 5A-5B, in some embodiments, there may be attached at the ends of the stack 6 one or more end plates 18 having a different thickness than plates 10. In some embodiments, end plates 18 can also be coated with one or more coatings. These coatings can be the same or different coatings than the coatings applied to plates 10. In certain most particularly preferred embodiments, no coatings are applied to end plates 18.


In certain embodiments, some LOEs may require different amounts of reflectivity in the different plates. Therefore, the reference to a “first coating” or “partially reflective coating” should be taken to refer to one coating from a group of coatings which are all partially reflective but may vary in their respective reflective parameters. In certain embodiments, the reflective parameters can be progressively changed for each subsequent surface according to the specific LOE design requirements.



FIGS. 6A-6B illustrate schematically an embodiment in which each of plates 10 can be coated on one side only. Referring now to FIG. 6A, in some embodiments, each of the plurality of plates 10 in stack 6 is coated with a partially reflective coating 12′. Referring now to FIG. 6B, coating 12′ may be comprised of alternating layers of a high index coating H having refractive index Rh, and low index coating L having refractive index Rl, where Rh>Rl. For example coating 12′ can consist of alternating coatings H1, L1, H2, L2 . . . , etc. where H, is applied to the plate surface, followed by L, applied over H1, followed by H2 applied over L1, followed by L, applied over H2 . . . etc. as shown in the left-hand side of FIG. 6B. It should be understood that coatings H and/or L can themselves be comprised of multiple different coating materials that when combined achieve the desired refractive index, i.e. Rh for the H coating layer and R, for L coating layer.


Since each of coatings H and L have respective inherent stress characteristics (tensile or compressive) when applied to the surface of a plate (which may vary according to the specific temperature, thickness, coating procedure, etc.) the overall stress of coating 12′ can be calculated using known techniques such as the Stoney equation. The overall stress of 12′ may be undesirable and causing warping of plate 10 when applied to one side of each plate, as discussed above.


However, the inventors have found that it is possible to substitute some of the H or L layers with a substitute H′ or L′ (as the case may be) made of a different material or combination of materials as shown in the right-hand portion of FIG. 6B. In this case, a coating 12′ can be designed and constructed engineered to have overall neutral stress in the sense of having minimal or no tensile or compressive stress on plate 10. Thus coating 12′ may now be applied to one side of each of plates 10 without causing undesirable warping of the plates.


For example, consider a coating consisting of seventeen (17) alternating layers of SiO2 (R˜1.42) and Ta2O5 (R˜2.075) applied from the plate surface outward as:

    • Layers 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17=TA2O5
    • Layers 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16=SIO2


In this case, coating 12′ will have an overall tensile stress of around 6 minutes over 216.4 MPa, which is undesirable for a single side coating. However, if some of the L layers (i.e. SiO2) are replaced with layers of L′=MgF2 (R˜1.38), e.g.:

    • Layers 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17: TA2O5
    • Layers 2, 4, 6, 14, 16: SIO2
    • Layers 8, 10, 12: MgF2


      the MgF2 layers effectively neutralize the overall stress of coating 12′ such that the overall stress created by coating 12′ on plate 10 is minimal and therefore acceptable for a single side coating. It should be noted that the number of layers to be replaced is defined by the overall stress in the design and can change depending on number and stress properties of the materials and design and layers thicknesses.


It should further be noted that the refractive index of the substituted layer H‘ or L’ should preferably have no more than a 6% deviation from the refractive index of the primary layer H or L (as the case may be).


The LOE fabricated according to the teaching of the presently disclosed subject can be used in a variety of applications, such as the various near-eye displays and associated applications described in patents and patent applications of Lumus (Israel).


It is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details set forth in the description contained herein or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced and carried out in various ways. Hence, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein are for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. As such, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the conception upon which this disclosure is based may readily be utilized as a basis for designing other structures, methods, and systems for carrying out the several purposes of the presently disclosed subject matter.


Those skilled in the art will readily appreciate that various modifications and changes can be applied to the embodiments of the invention as hereinbefore described without departing from its scope, defined in and by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of fabricating a light-guide optical element having a plurality of partially reflecting surfaces comprising: providing a plurality of transparent plates, each plate polished on two opposite surfaces such that said surfaces are parallel to each other;coating a first of said surfaces of a subset of plates with a first coating;coating a second of said surfaces of said subset of plates with a second coating;bonding together the plurality of transparent plates to form a stack comprising an alternating arrangement of coated plates of the subset of plates and uncoated plates; andcutting the stack along parallel planes obliquely angled to the faces of the transparent plates so as to form the light-guide optical element;wherein the first coating is a partially reflective coating having a first set of mechanical properties, and the second coating is a partially reflective coating having a second set of mechanical properties substantially similar to the first set of mechanical properties.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first and second coatings are substantially the same.
  • 3. A light-guide optical element having at least one pair of parallel external surfaces comprising: a plurality of internal partially reflecting surfaces made from a plurality of transparent plates, each plate having opposite first and second surfaces that are non-parallel to the pair of parallel external surfaces, each plate polished on said first and second surfaces such that said first and second surfaces are parallel to each other;wherein each plate in a subset of the plurality of transparent plates is coated on the first surface with a first coating and coated on the second surface with a second coating, wherein the first coating is a partially reflective coating having a first set of mechanical properties, and the second coating is a non-reflective coating having a second set of mechanical properties substantially similar to the first set of mechanical properties, andwherein the plurality of transparent plates are bonded together to form a stack comprising an alternating arrangement of coated plates of the subset of plates and uncoated plates.
  • 4. A method of fabricating a light-guide optical element having a plurality of partially reflecting surfaces comprising: providing a plurality of transparent plates, each plate polished on two opposite surfaces such that said surfaces are parallel to each other;coating a first of said surfaces of each plates with a first coating;bonding together the plurality of transparent plates to form a stack; andcutting the stack along parallel planes obliquely angled to the faces of the transparent plates so as to form the light-guide optical element;wherein the first coating is a partially reflective coating comprised of a plurality of layers of alternating high refractive index coating material and low refractive index coating material, andwherein a first subset of the plurality of layers of the low index coating material is comprised of a first coating material have a first refractive index, andwherein a second subset of the plurality of layers of the low index coating material is comprised of a second coating material have a second refractive index, andwherein the combination of the high index coating material, first low index coating material and second low index coating material is effective to neutralize a stress imposed by the first coating on said plates.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein coating of said first and second surfaces of the subset of plates is performed simultaneously.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein the first set of mechanical properties and the second set of mechanical properties reduce or eliminate an amount of warping of the coated transparent plates due to stress on the coated transparent plates caused by the coatings.
  • 7. The light-guide optical element of claim 3, wherein the first set of mechanical properties and the second set of mechanical properties reduce or eliminate an amount of warping of the coated transparent plates due to stress on the coated transparent plates caused by the coatings.
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/IB2020/053492 4/14/2020 WO
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2020/212835 10/22/2020 WO A
US Referenced Citations (287)
Number Name Date Kind
2748659 Geffcken et al. Jun 1956 A
2795069 Hardesty Jun 1957 A
2886911 Hardesty May 1959 A
3491245 Hardesty Jan 1970 A
3626394 Nelson et al. Dec 1971 A
3667621 Barlow Jun 1972 A
3677621 Smith Jul 1972 A
3737212 Antonson et al. Jun 1973 A
3802763 Cook et al. Apr 1974 A
3829197 Thelen Aug 1974 A
3857109 Pilloff Dec 1974 A
3873209 Schinke et al. Mar 1975 A
3940204 Withrington Feb 1976 A
3969023 Brandt Jul 1976 A
4084883 Eastman et al. Apr 1978 A
4191446 Arditty et al. Mar 1980 A
4309070 St Leger Searle Jan 1982 A
4331387 Wentz May 1982 A
4355864 Soref Oct 1982 A
4516828 Steele May 1985 A
4613216 Herbec et al. Sep 1986 A
4711512 Upatnieks Dec 1987 A
4715684 Gagnon Dec 1987 A
4775217 Ellis Oct 1988 A
4798448 Van Raalte Jan 1989 A
4805988 Dones Feb 1989 A
4932743 Isobe et al. Jun 1990 A
4978952 Irwin Dec 1990 A
5033828 Haruta Jul 1991 A
5076664 Migozzi Dec 1991 A
5096520 Faris Mar 1992 A
5157526 Kondo et al. Oct 1992 A
5208800 Isobe et al. May 1993 A
5231642 Scifres et al. Jul 1993 A
5235589 Yokomori et al. Aug 1993 A
5301067 Bleier et al. Apr 1994 A
5353134 Michel et al. Oct 1994 A
5367399 Kramer Nov 1994 A
5369415 Richard et al. Nov 1994 A
5453877 Gerbe et al. Sep 1995 A
5543877 Takashi et al. Aug 1996 A
5555329 Kuper et al. Sep 1996 A
5619601 Akashi et al. Apr 1997 A
5650873 Gal et al. Jul 1997 A
5680209 Meinrad Oct 1997 A
5712694 Taira et al. Jan 1998 A
5724163 David Mar 1998 A
5751480 Kitagishi May 1998 A
5764412 Suzuki et al. Jun 1998 A
5829854 Jones Nov 1998 A
5883684 Millikan et al. Mar 1999 A
5896232 Budd et al. Apr 1999 A
5919601 Nguyen et al. Jul 1999 A
5966223 Amitai et al. Oct 1999 A
5982536 Swan Nov 1999 A
6021239 Minami et al. Feb 2000 A
6052500 Takano et al. Apr 2000 A
6091548 Chen Jul 2000 A
6144347 Mizoguchi et al. Nov 2000 A
6185015 Silviu et al. Feb 2001 B1
6222676 Togino et al. Apr 2001 B1
6231992 Niebauer et al. May 2001 B1
6239092 Papasso et al. May 2001 B1
6322256 Inada et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324330 Stites Nov 2001 B1
6349001 Spitzer Feb 2002 B1
6362861 Hertz et al. Mar 2002 B1
6384982 Spitzer May 2002 B1
6388814 Tanaka May 2002 B2
6404550 Yajima Jun 2002 B1
6404947 Matsuda Jun 2002 B1
6490104 Gleckman et al. Dec 2002 B1
6509982 Steiner Jan 2003 B2
6542298 Aoki Apr 2003 B1
6542307 Gleckman Apr 2003 B2
6556282 Jamieson et al. Apr 2003 B2
6577411 David Jun 2003 B1
6580529 Amitai et al. Jun 2003 B1
6671100 McRuer Dec 2003 B1
6690513 Hulse et al. Feb 2004 B2
6710902 Takeyama Mar 2004 B2
6829095 Amitai Apr 2004 B2
6775432 Basu Aug 2004 B2
6791760 Janeczko et al. Sep 2004 B2
6798579 Robinson et al. Sep 2004 B2
6847488 Travis Jan 2005 B2
6880931 Moliton et al. Apr 2005 B2
6942925 Lazarev et al. Sep 2005 B1
7016113 Choi et al. Mar 2006 B2
7021777 Amitai Apr 2006 B2
7088664 Kim et al. Aug 2006 B2
7175304 Wadia et al. Feb 2007 B2
7205960 David Apr 2007 B2
7355795 Yamazaki et al. Apr 2008 B1
7391573 Amitai Jun 2008 B2
7405881 Shimizu et al. Jul 2008 B2
7418170 Mukawa et al. Aug 2008 B2
7430355 Heikenfeld et al. Sep 2008 B2
7448170 Milovan et al. Nov 2008 B2
7457040 Amitai Nov 2008 B2
7576916 Amitai Aug 2009 B2
7577326 Amitai Aug 2009 B2
7643214 Amitai Jan 2010 B2
7672055 Amitai Mar 2010 B2
7724442 Amitai May 2010 B2
7724443 Amitai May 2010 B2
7736006 Freeman Jun 2010 B2
7778508 Hirayama Aug 2010 B2
7949214 Dejong May 2011 B2
7995275 Maeda et al. Aug 2011 B2
8000020 Amitai Aug 2011 B2
8035872 Ouchi Oct 2011 B2
8098439 Amitai et al. Jan 2012 B2
8187481 Hobbs May 2012 B1
8369019 Baker et al. Feb 2013 B2
8405573 Lapidot et al. Mar 2013 B2
8432614 Amitai Apr 2013 B2
8472119 Kelly Jun 2013 B1
8479119 Hörentrup et al. Jul 2013 B2
8643948 Amitai et al. Feb 2014 B2
8655178 Capron et al. Feb 2014 B2
8665178 Wang Mar 2014 B1
8666208 Amirparviz et al. Mar 2014 B1
8736963 Robbins et al. May 2014 B2
8743464 Amirparviz Jun 2014 B1
8873148 Gupta et al. Oct 2014 B1
8913865 Bennett Dec 2014 B1
8965152 Simmonds Feb 2015 B2
9025253 Hadad et al. May 2015 B2
9541762 Mukawa et al. Jan 2017 B2
9551880 Amitai Jan 2017 B2
9606354 Spitzer et al. Mar 2017 B2
9709809 Miyawaki et al. Jul 2017 B2
9753286 Gao et al. Sep 2017 B2
9766459 Alton et al. Sep 2017 B2
9798061 Hsiao et al. Oct 2017 B2
9805633 Zheng Oct 2017 B2
9927614 Vallius Mar 2018 B2
9933684 Brown et al. Apr 2018 B2
10007115 Greenhalgh et al. Jun 2018 B2
10077188 Dai et al. Sep 2018 B2
10198865 Kezele et al. Feb 2019 B2
10222535 Remhof et al. Mar 2019 B2
10302957 Sissom May 2019 B2
10326983 Hua et al. Jun 2019 B2
10409064 Hongseok et al. Sep 2019 B2
10564430 Amitai et al. Feb 2020 B2
11543583 Eisenfeld Jan 2023 B2
20010030860 Kimura et al. Oct 2001 A1
20020015233 Park Feb 2002 A1
20020089746 Akitaka Jul 2002 A1
20020176173 Song Nov 2002 A1
20020191297 Gleckman et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007157 Hulse et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030020006 Janeczko et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030063042 Friesem et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030072160 Kuepper et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030090439 Spitzer et al. May 2003 A1
20030165017 Amitai et al. Sep 2003 A1
20030197938 Schmidt et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030218718 Moliton et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040085649 Repetto et al. May 2004 A1
20040137189 Tellini et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040233534 Nakanishi et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050012842 Miyagawa et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050018308 Cassarly et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050024849 Parker et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050084210 Cha Apr 2005 A1
20050174641 Greenberg Aug 2005 A1
20050174658 Long et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050180687 Amitai et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050265044 Chen et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060126182 Levola Jun 2006 A1
20060268421 Shimizu et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274420 Chang Dec 2006 A1
20070008624 Hirayama Jan 2007 A1
20070041591 Suguta et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070070859 Hirayama Mar 2007 A1
20070165192 Prior Jul 2007 A1
20070188837 Shimizu et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070211339 Furusato Sep 2007 A1
20080025667 Amitai Jan 2008 A1
20080009458 Hirayama Apr 2008 A1
20080094586 Hirayama Apr 2008 A1
20080151375 Lin Jun 2008 A1
20080151379 Amitai Jun 2008 A1
20080192239 Otosaka Aug 2008 A1
20080198471 Amitai Aug 2008 A1
20080247150 Itoh et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080278812 Amitai Nov 2008 A1
20090010023 Kanade et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090052046 Amitai Feb 2009 A1
20090059380 Moliton Mar 2009 A1
20090122414 Amitai May 2009 A1
20090190222 Simmonds et al. Jul 2009 A1
20100027289 Aiki et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100053148 Khazeni et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100067110 Yaakov et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100111472 DeJong May 2010 A1
20100202128 Saccomanno Aug 2010 A1
20100214635 Sasaki et al. Aug 2010 A1
20100278480 Vasylyev et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100291489 Moskovits et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110002019 Routley et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110096391 Kanai et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110096566 Tsai et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110176218 Noui Jul 2011 A1
20110227661 Numata et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110242661 Simmonds Oct 2011 A1
20120039576 Dangel et al. Feb 2012 A1
20120062850 Travis Mar 2012 A1
20120062998 Schultz et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120147361 Mochizuki et al. Jun 2012 A1
20120176682 DeJong Jul 2012 A1
20120194781 Agurok Aug 2012 A1
20120200938 Totani et al. Aug 2012 A1
20120306940 Machida Dec 2012 A1
20130022316 Pelletier et al. Jan 2013 A1
20130120224 Cajigas et al. May 2013 A1
20130135749 Akutsu et al. May 2013 A1
20130250430 Robbuns et al. Sep 2013 A1
20130321432 Burns et al. Dec 2013 A1
20130334504 Thompson et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140003762 Macnamara Jan 2014 A1
20140043688 Schrader et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140185142 Gupta et al. Jul 2014 A1
20140226215 Komatsu et al. Aug 2014 A1
20140226361 Vasylyev Aug 2014 A1
20140232619 Hiraide Aug 2014 A1
20150016777 Abovitz et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150081313 Boross et al. Mar 2015 A1
20150138451 Amitai May 2015 A1
20150138646 Tatsugi May 2015 A1
20150153569 Yonekubo Jun 2015 A1
20150160529 Popovich et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150182348 Siegal et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150182748 Gefen et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150219834 Nichol et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150241619 Richards et al. Aug 2015 A1
20160116743 Amitai Apr 2016 A1
20160170214 Amitai Jun 2016 A1
20160234485 Robbins et al. Aug 2016 A1
20160238844 Dobschal Aug 2016 A1
20160031456 Jones et al. Oct 2016 A1
20160313567 Kurashige Oct 2016 A1
20160341964 Amitai Nov 2016 A1
20160363679 Jurok et al. Dec 2016 A1
20160370589 Wang Dec 2016 A1
20160370693 Watanabe Dec 2016 A1
20170003504 Vallius Jan 2017 A1
20170045743 Dobschal et al. Feb 2017 A1
20170045744 Amitai Feb 2017 A1
20170075119 Schultz et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170097506 Schowengerdt et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170122725 Yeoh May 2017 A1
20170242249 Wall Aug 2017 A1
20170255012 Tam Sep 2017 A1
20170276947 Yokoyama Sep 2017 A1
20170336636 Amitai et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170343822 Border et al. Nov 2017 A1
20170357095 Amitai Dec 2017 A1
20170363799 Ofir et al. Dec 2017 A1
20180039082 Amitai Feb 2018 A1
20180067315 Amitai et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180101087 Shinohara Apr 2018 A1
20180157057 Gelberg et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180023177 Schuck et al. Aug 2018 A1
20180267309 Klug Sep 2018 A1
20180284443 Matsuki et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180292599 Ofir et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180372940 Ishii et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190011710 Amitai Jan 2019 A1
20190056600 Danziger et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190064518 Danziger Feb 2019 A1
20190086674 Sinay et al. Mar 2019 A1
20190137818 Saito May 2019 A1
20190155035 Amitai May 2019 A1
20190170327 Eisenfeld et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190208187 Danziger Jul 2019 A1
20190212487 Danziger et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190227215 Danziger et al. Jul 2019 A1
20190293856 Danziger Sep 2019 A1
20190361240 Gelberg Nov 2019 A1
20190361241 Amitai Nov 2019 A1
20190377187 Rubin et al. Dec 2019 A1
20190391408 Mansharof Dec 2019 A1
20210149204 Amitai May 2021 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (102)
Number Date Country
200941530 Sep 2007 CN
101542346 Sep 2009 CN
101846799 Sep 2010 CN
103837988 Jun 2014 CN
106079770 Nov 2016 CN
106104569 Nov 2016 CN
107238928 Oct 2017 CN
206804895 Dec 2017 CN
1422172 Nov 1970 DE
19725262 Dec 1998 DE
102013106392 Dec 2014 DE
0365406 Apr 1990 EP
0380035 Aug 1990 EP
0399865 Nov 1990 EP
0543718 May 1993 EP
0566004 Oct 1993 EP
1158336 Nov 2001 EP
1180711 Feb 2002 EP
1326102 Jul 2003 EP
1385023 Jan 2004 EP
1485747 Dec 2004 EP
1562066 Aug 2005 EP
0770818 Apr 2007 EP
1779159 May 2007 EP
2530510 Dec 2012 EP
2496905 Jun 1982 FR
2638242 Apr 1990 FR
2721872 Jan 1996 FR
1514977 Jun 1978 GB
2220081 Dec 1989 GB
2272980 Jun 1994 GB
2278222 Nov 1994 GB
2278888 Dec 1994 GB
2495398 Apr 2013 GB
58217901 Dec 1983 JP
H02182447 Jul 1990 JP
04-159503 Jun 1992 JP
09085874 Sep 1995 JP
07280999 Oct 1995 JP
H09-258062 Oct 1997 JP
2001021448 Jan 2001 JP
2001343608 Dec 2001 JP
2002539498 Nov 2002 JP
2003337298 Nov 2002 JP
2003140081 May 2003 JP
2003149643 May 2003 JP
2003536102 Dec 2003 JP
2004527801 Sep 2004 JP
2005084522 Mar 2005 JP
2005164982 Jun 2005 JP
2007010830 Jun 2005 JP
2006003872 Jan 2006 JP
2006145644 Jun 2006 JP
2008053517 Mar 2008 JP
2011221235 Nov 2011 JP
2012123936 Jun 2012 JP
2012163659 Aug 2012 JP
2012-198263 Oct 2012 JP
2016028275 Feb 2016 JP
2012058404 Mar 2021 JP
201809798 Mar 2018 TW
9510106 Apr 1995 WO
9815868 Apr 1998 WO
1998058291 Dec 1998 WO
9952002 Oct 1999 WO
0004407 Jan 2000 WO
0063738 Oct 2000 WO
0127685 Apr 2001 WO
0195025 Dec 2001 WO
0195027 Dec 2001 WO
02082168 Oct 2002 WO
03058320 Jul 2003 WO
03081320 Oct 2003 WO
2004109349 Dec 2004 WO
2005024485 Mar 2005 WO
2005024491 Mar 2005 WO
2005024969 Mar 2005 WO
2005093493 Oct 2005 WO
2005124427 Dec 2005 WO
2006013565 Feb 2006 WO
2006085308 Aug 2006 WO
2006085309 Aug 2006 WO
2006085310 Aug 2006 WO
2006087709 Aug 2006 WO
2006098097 Sep 2006 WO
2007054928 May 2007 WO
2007093983 Aug 2007 WO
2008023367 Feb 2008 WO
2008129539 Oct 2008 WO
2008149339 Dec 2008 WO
2009009268 Jan 2009 WO
2009074638 Jun 2009 WO
2011130720 Oct 2011 WO
2013065656 May 2013 WO
2013175465 Nov 2013 WO
2013188464 Dec 2013 WO
2015081313 Jun 2015 WO
2015158828 Oct 2015 WO
2016103251 Jun 2016 WO
2016132347 Aug 2016 WO
2017106873 Jun 2017 WO
2017199232 Nov 2017 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (8)
Entry
Da-Yong et al., “A Continuous Membrance Micro Deformable Mirror Based on Anodic Bonding of SOI to Glass Water”, Microsystem Technologies, Micro and Nanosystems Information Storage and Processing Systems, vol. 16, No. 10, May 20, 2010 pp. 1765-1769.
Abadias G. et al., “Review Article: Stress in Thin Films and Coatings: Current Status, Challenges, and Prospects”, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, (20180000), vol. 36, No. 2, doi:10.1116/1.5011790, p. 020801, XP012226807 [Y] 9 * The first paragraph of the right column at p. 020801-34; the first paragraph of the right column at p. 020801-40 * DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1116/1.5011790.
Weiblein R.J et al “Optimized moth-eye anti-reflective structures for As2S3 chalcogenide optical fibers” in May 2016Optics Express 24(10):10172.
Amotchkina T. et al; “Stress compensation with antireflection coatings for ultrafast laser applications: from theory to practice,” Opt. Express 22, 30387-30393 (2014) Amotchkina T. et al. Dec. 31, 2014 (Dec. 31, 2014).
Mori H. et al., “Reflective coatings for the future x-ray mirror substrates”, Proc. SPIE 10699, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2018: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, 1069941 (Jul. 6, 2018); available at URL <http://doi.org/10.1117/12.2313469> Mori H. et al. Jul. 6, 2018 (Jul. 6, 2018).
Chalifoux B.D. et al., “Compensating film stress in thin silicon substrates using ion implantation,” Opt. Express 27, 11182-11195 (Jan. 21, 2019) Chalifoux B.D. et al. Jan. 21, 2019 (Jan. 21, 2019).
J. Wei et al; Glass-to-glass anodic bonding process and electrostatic force in J. Wei*, S.M.L. Nai, C.K. Wong, L.C. Lee J/Thin Solid Films 462-463 (2004) 487-491.
Salter, P. S. and Booth, M. J. et al. “Designing and aligning optical systems incorporating Liquid crystal spatial light modulators (SLMs)”, Department of Engineering, University of Oxford, vr1.0, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4518992 (published online Feb. 12, 2020) Salter, P. S. and Booth, M. J. Feb. 12, 2020 (Feb. 12, 2020).
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20220137274 A1 May 2022 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62833808 Apr 2019 US