The present invention generally relates to exterior siding materials for use on exterior walls of houses and other structures. More particularly, the invention is directed toward unitary, modular shake-siding panels composed of fiber-cement siding or other suitable siding materials.
The exterior walls of houses and other structures are often protected and decorated with a variety of exterior siding products typically made from wood, vinyl, aluminum, stucco or fiber-cement. Additionally, wood and fiber-cement siding products are generally planks, panels or shakes that are “hung” on plywood or composite walls.
Exterior siding shakes are popular products for protecting and enhancing the exterior appearance of homes, offices and other structures. Exterior siding shakes are typically small, rectilinear pieces of cedar or fiber-cement siding. Cedar siding shakes are generally formed by splitting a cedar block along the grain, and fiber-cement siding shakes are generally formed by cross-cutting a plank of fiber-cement siding having a width corresponding to the width of the individual shakes. Although both cedar and fiber-cement siding shakes are generally rectilinear, the bottom edge of the shakes can be trimmed to different shapes for decorative effect. The bottom edge of the shakes, for example, can be scalloped, triangular, square or a modified square with rounded corners.
To install shake siding, a large number of shakes are individually attached to an exterior wall of a structure using nails, staples or other suitable fasteners. Each shake usually abuts an adjacent shake to form a horizontal row of shakes, and each row of shakes overlaps a portion of an immediately underlying row of shakes. For example, a first row of shakes is attached to the bottom of the wall, and then each successive row overlaps the top portion of the immediate underlying row. As such, each shake is generally laterally offset from the shakes in the immediately underlying row so that the shakes in one row span across the abutting edges of the shakes in the immediate underlying row.
One concern of wood siding shakes is that wood has several disadvantages in exterior siding applications. Wood siding, for example, may be undesirable in dry climates or in areas subject to brush fires because it is highly flammable. In humid climates, such as Florida, the wood siding shakes are also generally undesirable because they absorb moisture and may warp or crack. Such warping or cracking may not only destroy the aesthetic beauty of the siding, but it may also allow water to damage the underlying wall. Additionally, wood siding shakes are also undesirable in many other applications because insects infest the siding and other structural components of the structure.
Another concern with conventional siding shakes made from cedar or fiber-cement siding is that it is time consuming to individually attach each shake to a wall. Moreover, additional time is required to individually trim certain shakes to fit in irregular areas on the wall, such as edges and corners. Thus, installing conventional siding shakes requires an extensive amount of labor and time.
To reduce the installation time of installing individual shakes, a particular cedar shake panel has been developed that allows a number of individual shakes to be hung contemporaneously. The particular cedar shake panels have a plurality of individual shakes attached to a thin backing strip composed of plywood. More specifically, the top portion of each individual shake is nailed, stapled, glued or otherwise connected to the plywood backing strip. The particular cedar shake panels reduce the labor required to install the shakes because a single panel covers between two and four linear feet of wall space that would otherwise need to be covered by individual shakes. Such cedar shake panels, however, are significantly more expensive than individual shakes because the shakes are still individually attached to the plywood backing strip by the manufacturer. The plywood backing strip also increases the material costs because it is not required for installing individual shakes. Moreover, the thin plywood backing strip is particularly subject to moisture damage that causes significant warping of the panels and cracking of the shakes. Such cedar shake-siding panels, therefore, are not widely used in humid or wet climates because they are relatively expensive and they have significant long-time performance problems.
The present invention is directed toward unitary modular shake panels, and methods for making and using such shake panels. In one aspect of the invention, a unitary modular shake panel includes an interconnecting section composed of a siding material and several integral shake sections projecting from the interconnecting section. The panel preferably has a quadrilateral shape with first and second edges along a longitudinal dimension that are separated from each other by a width of the panel along a transverse dimension. Additionally, the shake sections are separated from one another by slots extending from the second edge to an intermediate width in the panel. In a preferred embodiment, the panel is composed of a unitary piece of fiber-cement siding with a simulated wood grain running along the transverse dimension. The interconnecting section is preferably a web portion of the fiber-cement siding piece, and the shake sections are different portions of the same fiber-cement siding piece defined by the slots extending in the transverse dimension from the web portion to the second edge of the panel.
Modular shake panels in accordance with the invention may be made using several different processes. In one embodiment, for example, a plurality of unitary modular shake panels are manufactured by the cutting a plurality of planks from a sheet of siding material, and then forming slots in the planks to define the web portion and the shake sections of each panel. The planks are preferably cut from the sheet in a direction transverse to a wood grain on the surface of the sheet. The slots are preferably cut in the planks in the direction of the wood grain from a longitudinal edge to an intermediate depth within the planks.
The following description describes unitary modular shake panels and methods for making and using such shake panels. Although
The particular embodiment of the shake panel 20 shown in
The unitary modular shake panels 20 can be made from many suitable siding materials in which the web portion 32 and the shake sections 30 are integrally formed from the same piece of siding material. In a preferred embodiment, the shake panels 20 are pieces of fiber-cement siding made from cement, ground silica sand, and cellulose fibers that have a simulated wood grain 27 formed on an exterior surface. The shake sections 30 and the web portion 32 of a particular panel 20 are preferably formed from a single piece of fiber-cement siding. Additionally, the slots 28 preferably extend in the direction of the simulated wood grain 27. Thus, the slots 28 and the grain 27 give the appearance of individual shakes to each shake section 30.
In some applications, it is necessary to use partial shake panels. In any given installation, for example, the height and/or width of a wall may not be evenly divisible by the full length of the shake panels, or the wall may not be rectilinear. These two factors, combined with the lateral offset of each row relative to the row below it, may result in a space along a particular row of shake panels less than the full-length of a shake panel. In these situations, a partial shake panel (e.g., panel 20d) is cut to fit in the available space.
The embodiments of unitary modular shake panels 20 shown in
In addition to reducing installation time, when the modular shake-siding panels 20 are composed of fiber-cement siding material, they reduce cracking or warping damage compared to conventional wood shakes or conventional wood-shake panels. As discussed above with reference to the background section, conventional wood shakes and wood-shake panels are flammable and subject to moisture and/or insect damage. Conventional wood-shake panels, for example, are easily damaged by moisture because the thin plywood backing strip is particularly susceptible to delamination or warping in humid or wet environments. In contrast to conventional wood-shake panels, the fiber-cement shake panels 20 are highly resistant to fire, moisture and insects. Thus, the fiber-cement shake panels 20 are expected to last much longer than conventional wood-shake panels with a plywood backing strip or wood shakes.
The planks 50 are preferably cut from a sheet 48 composed of fiber-cement siding material using a large shear having opposing serrated blades that span across the width of the panel 48. Suitable shears, for example, are similar to the Model Nos. SS 100 or SS 110 pneumatic shears manufactured by Pacific International Tool and Shear, and disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,570,678 and 5,722,386, which are herein incorporated by reference. The planks 50 may also be cut from the sheet using a high-pressure fluid-jet or an abrasive disk. Suitable high-pressure fluid-jet cutting systems are manufactured by Flow International Corporation of Kent, Wash.
The slots 28 are preferably cut in planks 50 composed of fiber-cement siding material using a reciprocating blade shear. For example, suitable reciprocating blade shears are the Model Nos. SS 302 and SS 303 shears also manufactured by Pacific International Tool and Shear of Kingston, Washington, and disclosed in a U.S. Pat. No. 5,993,303, which issued Nov. 30, 1999, entitled “HAND-HELD CUTTING TOOL FOR CUTTING FIBER-CEMENT SIDING,” and filed on Mar. 6, 1998, which is herein incorporated by reference. The slots 28 can be also cut in fiber-cement siding planks 50 using high-pressure fluid-jets or abrasive disks.
Referring to
The particular embodiments of the methods for manufacturing unitary modular shake panels described above with reference to
In addition to the advantages described above, the particular embodiment of the method for fabricating the long unitary fiber-cement shake-siding panels 120 is particularly advantageous for saving time in both manufacturing and installing the shake-siding panels 120. For example, compared to cutting planks 50 from a 4′×8′ sheet 48 of fiber-cement siding to have a length of 4 feet, the planks 150 may be cut in much longer lengths (e.g., 12 feet). As such, a significant amount of board feet of completed fiber-cement shake-siding panels 120 may be manufactured with simple, long cuts that require less time and labor than making the planks 50. Moreover, because the siding panels 120 are longer than siding panels 20, more linear footage of wall space may be covered by hanging a panel 120 than a panel 20 in about the same time. Thus, the long siding panels 120 are generally expected to also reduce the time and labor required to install fiber-cement siding shakes.
Although specific embodiments of the present invention are described herein for illustrative purposes, persons skilled in the relevant art will recognize that various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention. The foregoing description accordingly applies to other unitary modular shake panels, and methods for making and using such shake-panels. In general, therefore, the terms in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification. Thus, the invention is not limited by the foregoing description, but instead the scope of the invention is determined entirely by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/935,208, filed Aug. 21, 2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,526,717, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/074,809, filed May 7, 1998, U.S. Pat. No. 6,276,107.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
748141 | Zwerk | Dec 1903 | A |
1157438 | Spiegel et al. | Oct 1915 | A |
1447567 | Overbury | Mar 1923 | A |
1481670 | MacAllister et al. | Jan 1924 | A |
1487155 | Fink | Mar 1924 | A |
1495070 | Finley | May 1924 | A |
1601731 | Flood | Oct 1926 | A |
1720708 | Young | Jul 1929 | A |
1732403 | Harris et al. | Oct 1929 | A |
1870414 | Levin et al. | Aug 1932 | A |
1872185 | Reade | Aug 1932 | A |
1915964 | Wall | Jun 1933 | A |
1959960 | Magrath | May 1934 | A |
2041041 | Batcheller | May 1936 | A |
2142181 | Croce | Jan 1939 | A |
2149741 | Miles | Mar 1939 | A |
2171010 | Schuetz et al. | Aug 1939 | A |
2171910 | Blackwood, Jr. | Sep 1939 | A |
2174098 | Stein | Sep 1939 | A |
2187203 | Johnston | Jan 1940 | A |
2199760 | Schuetz | May 1940 | A |
2323230 | McAvoy | Jun 1943 | A |
2348223 | Papesh | May 1944 | A |
3166872 | Cacossa | Jan 1965 | A |
3608261 | French et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3809598 | Ferguson et al. | May 1974 | A |
3830687 | Re et al. | Aug 1974 | A |
3868300 | Wheeler | Feb 1975 | A |
3899344 | Jakel | Aug 1975 | A |
3927501 | Allen et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
3943677 | Carothers | Mar 1976 | A |
3977141 | Peters | Aug 1976 | A |
4015391 | Epstein et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4040851 | Ziegler | Aug 1977 | A |
4050209 | Barker et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
4070843 | Leggiere et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4091588 | Heirich | May 1978 | A |
4130974 | Chalmers et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4263365 | Burgess et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4288959 | Murdock | Sep 1981 | A |
4333279 | Corbin et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4363666 | Johnson et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4366197 | Hanlon et al. | Dec 1982 | A |
4406703 | Guthrie et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4428775 | Johnson et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4437274 | Slocum et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4468909 | Eaton | Sep 1984 | A |
4499702 | Turner | Feb 1985 | A |
4543159 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4587785 | Rohner | May 1986 | A |
4598522 | Hoofe, III | Jul 1986 | A |
4637191 | Smith | Jan 1987 | A |
4637860 | Harper et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4680911 | Davis et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4876151 | Eichen | Oct 1989 | A |
4914885 | Baker et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4982541 | Winter, IV | Jan 1991 | A |
5076037 | Crick et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5196061 | Thomas et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5234754 | Bache et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5295339 | Manner | Mar 1994 | A |
5305569 | Malmquist et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5323581 | Jakel | Jun 1994 | A |
5465547 | Jakel | Nov 1995 | A |
5501056 | Hannah et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5570678 | Waggoner et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5595036 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5603758 | Schreifels, Jr. et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5614307 | Andersen et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5632848 | Richards et al. | May 1997 | A |
5648144 | Maurer et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5722386 | Fladgard et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5830548 | Andersen et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5993303 | Fladgard et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6067766 | Badke et al. | May 2000 | A |
6092370 | Tremoulet et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6276107 | Waggoner et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6336303 | Vandeman et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6526717 | Waggoner et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-9957392 | Nov 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030110729 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09935208 | Aug 2001 | US |
Child | 10357801 | US | |
Parent | 09074809 | May 1998 | US |
Child | 09935208 | US |