This is a §371 application of International patent application number PCT/EP2010/004970 filed Aug. 6, 2010, which claims priority of European patent application number 09460038.4 filed on Aug. 31, 2009, both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention is concerned with a method for faulted phase selection and fault type determination in electric power lines applicable both to series compensated and uncompensated power lines, fit for use in the power industry for overhead and overhead-cable transmission or distribution lines.
Fast and reliable fault type determination of the fault in electric power lines is of great importance both for power companies dealing with electric energy distribution and for end users of electric energy. Quick and exact fault type selection affects the quality of power system protection. A means for fault phase selection and fault type determination is usually a part of a digital protection relay located in power stations or substations. Depending on the fault type, different current and voltage fault loops are distinguished and processed in the protection relay. Therefore the proper fault type selection influences the final operation of the protection relay and an error in the fault type identification may lead to mal-operation of the protection relay.
An example of a protection relay that utilizes a faulted phase selection is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,409,636. In this solution the delta based phase selector has been known not to reliably detect three-phase faults. It calculates the percentage of the largest faulted value, and then subtracts it from the phases. If the result is a positive value the phase is detected faulted. If negative, the phase is not faulted. Often, in a three-phase fault, one of the faulted phases does not reach this level, and the phase remains undetected. Another example of a method and a device for phase selection for single-phase tripping of high-impedance ground faults is described in a U.S. Pat. No. 5,390,067. The U.S. Pat. No. 5,390,067 is limited to the selection of a single ground fault. Application of the method is limited to the networks with the earthed neutral point.
The mentioned disadvantages are overcome by the method, the device and the computer program as defined in claims 1, 2 and 3 respectively.
From JP patent application JP 2001192428 (publication No. JP2003009381) there is known a method for faulty phase selection in multi terminal system. In this method a phase selector is used, which comprises a first operating means for calculating the differential current of each phase of each transmission line; a second operating means for calculating the line differential current of a faulty line, based on the differential current of each phase obtain from the first operating means and faulty line information, a third operating means for determining the ratio of a minimum value to a maximum value obtained from the second operating means; a fourth operating means for making decision that a single phase fault has occurred, if ratio obtained from the third operating means is smaller than a specified value; a fifth operating means for determining the ratio of a differential current in the phase not constituting a maximum value to a smaller differential current, with regard to differential currents of two phases constituting the maximum value of line differential current; a sixth operating means for making a decision that a two-phase fault has occurred if a ratio obtained from the fifth operating means is smaller than a specified value; and seventh operating means for deciding that a three-phase fault has occurred, when the ratio obtained from the fifth operating means is not smaller than the specified value. Generally, there are problems with selection of a three-phase fault because one of the faulted phases does not reach a setting level. Moreover, the application of the method is limited to the networks with the earthed neutral point.
A process for identifying the type of fault detected by a protection relay is known from patent description U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,946. This process includes measuring pre-fault and post-fault samples of current waveforms on the phase-A, phase-B and phase-C conductors of a transmission line. Next increment currents DELIA1, DELIB1 and DELIC1 are calculated, where
DELIA1=(Iar−Iapr)2−(Iai−Iapi)2,
DELIB1=(Ibr−Ibpr)2−(Ibi−Ibpi)2,
DELIC1=(Icr−Icpr)2−(Ici−Icpi)2.
The increment currents are then employed to identify a two-phase to ground fault. In calculating the increment currents, Iar represents a post-fault value of the real part of the phase-A current, Iapr represents a pre-fault value of the real part of of the phase-A current, Iai represents a post-fault value of the imaginary part of the phase-A current and Iapi represents a pre-fault value of the real part of the phase-A current. The phase-B and phase-C value are denoted accordingly. The fault type is estimated by using crisp logical operators—greater than, less than.
A method of fault phase selection and fault type determination in electric power lines, according to the invention, making use of a protection relay having means for fault detection and computer means for signal and data processing, using a fault inception detection and an estimation of fault phase current signals, pre-fault current signals and zero-sequence current in order to receive the absolute value of incremental current signals IAB, IBC, ICA and their maximum value Imax from which real value indicators for phase to phase faults SA,SB,SC, real value indicators for 3-phase fault S3A,S3B,S3C and a real value indicator for ground fault SG are determined, the method further comprises the following steps:
The device for implementing the method according to claims 1-2 of fault phase selection and fault type determination in electric power lines, comprising means for current signal filtering, fault inception time identification, pre-fault and fault current signal determination, incremental current calculation and maximal value of incremental current signal calculation, embedded in a protective protection relay in a pre-filtering block of a fault phase selection and fault type determination module further contains:
A computer program product comprising computer program code which when executed on a computing device caries out the steps of a method according to the claims 1-2.
The inventive method is used in a protection relay having modules for faulted phase selection and fault type determination. A real time digital current signals coming from current transformers and converted in an A/D converter or a digital signal compatible with IEC 61850 standard is transmitted by the IEC 618550 9-2 protocol or any other communication protocol. The conversion of analogue signals, measured phase current signals iA, iB, iC with the aid of the current instrument transformer CT to obtain sampled discrete time values, in this context and interconnection by means of the station communication protocol preferably compatible with the IEC 61850 standard should be regarded as conventional techniques and have therefore been omitted.
The present invention relates to a method for faulted phase selection and fault type determination based on only current signal measurements. Thanks to the inventive approach high reliability of identification of the faulted phase is achieved. The developed method is fast and permits to identify any types of faults with superior reliability even for high-impedance faults. The fault type is estimated using soft operators like: minimal, maximal instead of crisp logical operators greater than, less than. The decision is determined for the consecutive samples by calculating real value indicator indices. All these indices are continuous real values—not logical. The main feature of the proposed method consists in the new way for making the final decision. The decision for fault-type selection is scheduled in the way that the greater value pointed on the more probable selection.
A method of fault phase selection is presented in the drawing, where
FIG. 2—the inventive part of the system for phase selection in a protection relay,
FIG. 3—a set of steps for the realisation of the inventive method.
Current transformers 1 are connected with a protection relay 2 by an analogue wire link 3 or by means of a process communication bus 4 containing a Margin Unit 5. The protection relay 2 with a data processing unit P comprises an A/D converter 6 and an arrangement of functional modules M1, M2, M3, M4 where the module M1 is a buffer module for storing data delivered from an on-line measurement, the module M2 is the inventive fault phase selection and fault type determination module, the module M3 is a calculating module connecting with the others modules and the module M4 is an information module for giving the result of the inventive method. In the case when the protection relay 2 is connected by the communication bus 4, the A/D converter 6 may be placed in the Margin Unit 5 instead of being in the protection relay 2. It is obvious that the protection relay comprises other modules which are essential for the proper operation of the protection relay 2 and which are not described in this description and not presented in the
Input data, current signals iA, iB, iC, from the individual phases A, B, C are measured by the current transformers 1 and delivered to the A/D converter 6 in the protection relay 2 by the analogue wire link 3 or to the AD/converter 6 in the Margin Unit 5 from which the digitalized current signals IA, IB, IC, are delivered to the protection relay 2 by the communication bus 4. The digital current signals are stored in the buffer module M1. Digital current signals IA, IB, IC are processed in the module M2 by its functional blocks B1-B4, where data are filtered in a known way using the pre-filtering block B1 (
The method according to the invention is carried out in the following steps:
Step 1
In the first step S1 (
The phase-to-ground fault share coefficient cF0 depicts a predetermined set of coefficients whose value is selected in this way that good sensitivity for phase-to-ground fault and phase-to-phase-to ground fault are achieved.
Generally cF0 is determined by the following relation:
where:
3I0m—presents the minimum detected neutral current signal during phase to ground fault,
Ir—presents line RMS rated current signal,
Usually, it is assumed that cF0>2.0. In the embodiment of the invention it was set as cF0=2.5.
The phase-to-phase fault share coefficient cF1 depicts a predetermined set of coefficients whose value is selected in this way that good selectivity between phase-to-phase and 3-phase and also between and phase to phase to ground fault is accomplished. These conditions are assured for the relation:
cF1>3 and
In the embodiment of the invention it was set as cF1=5.0.
Step 2
Next in the step S2 the digital current signals from individual phases IA, IB, IC are filtered using one of the known methods of filtering, for example a short window Fourier filter method, in order to obtain phasor values of digital current signals IA, IB, IC for each individual phase A,B,C.
Step 3
In the step S3 the pre-fault current signals IAp, IBp, ICp and fault current signals IAf, IBf, ICf are determined using internal protection relay signals—fault inceptions time tF. The fault inception time tF is identified from the analysis of phasor values of digital current signals IA, IB, IC by common known methods, for example based on numerically computing the first derivative of the current signals and cycle algorithm comparing the present current sample with the current sample one cycle back.
Step 4
In the step S4 the difference values of fault phase current signals ΔIAB, ΔIBC, ΔICA and the difference value of pre-fault current signals ΔIABp, ΔIBCp, ΔICAp are determined for each of the phases A, B, C respectively according to the following formulas:
ΔIAB=IAf−IBf,
ΔIBC=IBf−ICf,
ΔICA=ICf−IAf,
ΔIABp=IAp−IBp,
ΔIBCp=IBp−ICp,
ΔICAp=ICp−IAp.
Step 5
In the step S5 the absolute values of the incremental current signals IAB, IBC, ICA are calculated as the absolute value of the difference value of the fault phase current signals ΔIAB, ΔIBC, ΔICA and the difference value of the pre-fault current signals ΔIABp, ΔIBCp, ΔICAp as:
IAB=abs(ΔIAB−ΔIABp),
IBC=abs(ΔIBC−ΔIBCp),
ICA=abs(ΔICA−ΔICAp)
and next the maximal value of incremental current signal Imx is calculated as:
Imx=max(IAB,IBC,ICA).
Step 6
Next in the step S6 real value indicators SA,SB,SC,S3A,S3B,S3C,SG for all fault types are determined taking into account three types of data:
a) the first type of data concern current based indicators for phase-to-phase faults for which real value indicators SA,SB,SC for each phase A,B,C are calculated as a minimum value of coefficients x1,x2,x3,xa,xb,xc:
SA=min(x1,x3,xa),
SB=min(x2,x1,xb),
SC=min(x3,x2,xc)
where:
IG0—is calculated as IG0=IG1−Ir, where Ir—is the line rated current RMS value delivered to the buffer module M1 in the step 1,
ΔIm—is calculated as a maximal value of the absolute value of the difference value of fault phase current signals according to the formula:
ΔIm=max(abs(ΔIAB),abs(ΔIBC),abs(ΔICA)).
Step 7
Next, in the step S7 having the real value indicators SA,SB,SC,S3A,S3B,S3C,SG and using ‘soft’ operators as the minimum value of the real value indicators, the fault type indicators F1-F10 are calculated to determine the fault type in such a way that:
In the next step S8 a maximum of all values of fault type indicators F1-f10 are calculated according to this formula:
Fmax=max({Fflt}),
If Fmax is bigger than a thresF it means that an error is occurred during the fault determination or in fault inception detection.
‘thresF’ is a small positive threshold value used to stabilize the algorithm and avoid noise influences.
The typical value is limited to 0<thresF<0.1.
Step 9
In the next step S9 the real fault type indicator Fmax available in each of the modules M1 . . . M4 is transmitted to the display or to printing devices which are connected with one of the modules and which are not presented in the drawing. The information on the selected phase in which the fault occurred is presented to the user of the relay device 2 together with the information about the type of the fault.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09460038 | Aug 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/004970 | 8/6/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/18/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/023305 | 3/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4409636 | Brandt et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
5390067 | Eriksson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5783946 | Yang | Jul 1998 | A |
20030142450 | Bo | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20060152866 | Benmouyal et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2 051 509 | Jan 1981 | GB |
2003 009381 | Jan 2003 | JP |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report in corresponding application No. PCT/EP2010/004970 as mailed Oct. 21, 2010. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120150460 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |