This invention relates to a method for forming 3D objects from a spray material.
It is known to produce 3D objects by cold spraying metallic powder from a nozzle onto a substrate in the manner of a 3D print. This is for example for example outlined in J Pattison et al, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Volume 47, Issues 3-4, March 2007, Pages 627-63. With many known techniques the spray material deposits in a generally conical pattern. It results in the sides of the eventual 3D object having an undesired taper. This makes it less than feasible, for example, to spray an object in layers because the taper effect leaves each subsequent layer with less area than the one before. In other words the taper is carried from layer to layer. It is an object of preferred embodiments of the invention to go at least some way towards addressing this. While this applies to preferred embodiments it should be understood that the object of the invention per se is simply to provide a useful choice. Therefore any advantages or limitations applicable to preferred embodiments should not be read as a limitation on the scope of any claims expressed more broadly.
The term “comprising” when used in this document in relation to a combination of features or steps should not be taken to rule out the option of there being additional features or steps. The term should not be interpreted in a limiting way.
According to one aspect, the invention relates to a method for forming a 3D object, comprising running control means with reference to data which defines 3D shape parameters of an object such that the control means:
Optionally the spray is a cold spray and may comprise metallic powder.
Optionally filling in the taper involves the control means:
Optionally the data defines the 3D object in terms of a series of the layers (eg notional slices) and the control means uses pre-defined parameters for the next layer to control the angle between the applicator and taper for spray-filling the taper.
Optionally a surface scanner repeatedly measures the object as it is being built and the control means uses the measurements to adjust the relative positions of the object (when part formed) and the applicator, and/or spray parameters for the nozzle, to enhance accuracy of match between the shape parameters and the object when completed.
A method for forming a 3D object, comprising running a computerised controller with reference to data which defines 3D shape parameters of an object in terms of notional slices such that the controller:
Optionally the material sprayed for each line interleaves with material sprayed for one or more neighbouring lines.
Optionally a surface scanner repeatedly measures the object as it is being built, and the controller uses the measurements to adjust applicator and/or substrate and/or spray parameters to enhance accuracy of match between the shape parameters and the object when completed.
Some preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying drawings, of which:
Referring to
The robotic arm 3 is preferably such that it can move the substrate and therefore the part-formed 3D object in any direction and to any angle. The nozzle 2 is stationary in the
Referring again to
The data defines the shape of the 3D object in terms of a series of slices, each corresponding to one of the layers mentioned previously. When controlling the nozzle 2 and or robotic arm 3/substrate to fill in a taper with transverse deposition strokes, the controller 16 calculates and determines the best nozzle angle of attack and distance to the taper based on the parameters for the next slice or cross-section in the notional stack. The base of the next slice may be used to demarcate a notional boundary for filling in the taper below. The controller 16 also calculates the necessary spray parameters in terms of spray duration, rate of powder feed, spray velocity, temperature of the powder/spray and type of spray material being used.
Movement of the nozzle 2 and/or the robotic arm 3/substrate can be done directly by the controller, for example in a case where the controller and/or nozzle 2 and/or robotic arm 3 incorporate mechanical parts able to move the substrate and/or nozzle in any of three dimensions. However in other embodiments the controller 16 may cause indirect movement of the nozzle and the robotic arm 3/substrate, for example by manipulating a multi-axis positioning device to bring about the same three dimensional movement.
Preferably the infill for each layer is done to achieve a flat top surface parallel to the substrate. However this is not essential and in some cases alternative approaches may be adopted.
In some embodiments of the invention accuracy may be enhanced by including means for measuring the periphery of each layer as it forms, for example with a laser line scanner, a stereoscopic imager or a structured light camera. The measurements are communicated to the controller 16 in real time and used to calculate and bring about adjustments to the operation of the nozzle, substrate or spray parameters.
In preferred forms of the invention sweeps of the robotic arm 3/substrate past the spray nozzle 2 are regulated by the controller 16 to deposit interleaved lines of spray material. In some applications this can improve the deposition ratio.
While some preferred embodiments have been described by way of example it should appreciated that modifications and improvements can occur without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2016904106 | Oct 2016 | AU | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AU2017/051083 | 10/5/2017 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/068082 | 4/19/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5316800 | Noakes | May 1994 | A |
6296043 | Bowen | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6492651 | Kerekes | Dec 2002 | B2 |
20040222310 | Donatti | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20070158200 | Cohen | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20100170937 | Calla | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20130193619 | Church | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20150056465 | Zahiri | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20160107231 | Doye | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160167300 | Davies | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160236416 | Bheda | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160320771 | Huang | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160325498 | Gelbart | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20170113409 | Patrov | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170165917 | McKiel, Jr. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170287685 | Ferrasse | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180050391 | Maev | Feb 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
104985813 | Mar 2017 | CN |
2013142176 | Jul 2013 | JP |
2015020939 | Feb 2015 | WO |
2015026849 | May 2015 | WO |
2015157816 | Oct 2015 | WO |
2015194678 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2015189600 | Dec 2015 | WO |
2016039399 | Mar 2016 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pattison, J., et al. “Cold Gas Dynamic Manufacturing: A Non-Thermal Approach to Freeform Fabrication.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 47, No. 3-4, 2007, pp. 627-634 (Year: 2007). |
Assadi, H., et al. “On Parameter Selection in Cold Spraying.” Journal of Thermal Spray Technology, vol. 20, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1161-1176 (Year: 2011). |
Li, Chang-Jiu, et al. “A Theoretical Model for Prediction of Deposition Efficiency in Cold Spraying.” Thin Solid Films, vol. 489, No. 1-2, 2005, pp. 79-85 (Year: 2005). |
Özdemir, Ozan Çaǧatay, Joseph Mitchell Conahan, and Sinan Müftü. 2020. “Particle Velocimetry, CFD, and the Role of Particle Sphericity in Cold Spray” Coatings 10, No. 12: 1254 (Year: 2020). |
Ozdemir, O.C., Muftu, S. Novel Method of Predicting Deposition Efficiency in Cold Spray by Incorporating Sphericity into a 1D Analytical Model. J Therm Spray Tech 32, 657-672 (2023) (Year: 2023). |
Ozdemir, O.C., Widener, C.A., Carter, M.J. et al. Predicting the Effects of Powder Feeding Rates on Particle Impact Conditions and Cold Spray Deposited Coatings. J Therm Spray Tech 26, 1598-1615 (2017). (Year: 2017). |
Ozdemir, O.C., Schwartz, P., Muftu, S. et al. High Rate Deposition in Cold Spray. J Therm Spray Tech 30, 344-357 (2021). (Year: 2021). |
Translation of Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2021—CN 201780063158.5. |
Translation of Brazilian Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2021—BR 112019007190. |
Translation of Turkish Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2021—TR 201905405. |
Australian Statement of Grounds and Particulars dated Nov. 13, 2023—AU 2017342702. |
Australian Examination Report No. 1dated Apr. 28, 2022—AU 2017342702. |
Australian Examination Report No. 2 dated Dec. 14, 2022—AU 2017342702. |
Australian Examination Report No. 3 dated Mar. 15, 2023—AU 2017342702. |
Korean Office Action dated Apr. 16, 2021—KR 1020197011562. |
Korean Office Action dated Nov. 22, 2022—KR 1020227018342. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 4, 2021—CN 201780063158.5. |
Chinese Office Action dated Jul. 8, 2021—CN 201780063158.5. |
Japanese Written Opinion dated Mar. 3, 2022—English translation—JP 2019518914. |
Japanese Notice of Reasons for Refusal dated Sep. 10, 2021—English translation—JP 2019518914. |
Brazilian Office Action dated Oct. 5, 2021—BR 112019007190. |
Indian Examination Report dated Mar. 15, 2021—IN 201917018569. |
Turkish Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2021—TR 201905405. |
Australian Evidence in Support—Hussain declaration dated Feb. 10, 2024. |
J Pattison, “Cold Gas Dynamic Manufacturing”, Ph.D. thesis, Darwin College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge (UK), 2006. |
Fasching, M.M., et al. “Planning robotic trajectories for thermal spray shape deposition”, Journal of Thermal Spray Technology 2, 45-57 (1993). |
R. Gadow, M. Floristan, “11—Manufacturing engineering in thermal spraying by advanced robot systems and process kinematics”, Future Development of Thermal Spray Coatings, Woodhead Publishing, 2015, pp. 259-280. |
D. Hegels and H. Müller, “Evolutionary path generation for reduction of thermal variations in thermal spray coating”, Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation (GECCO '13). |
G. Tapia and A. Elwany, “A Review on Process Monitoring and Control in Metal-Based Additive Manufacturing”, Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 136 (6), 2014. |
Chang-Jiu Li, Wen-Ya Li, “Deposition characteristics of titanium coating in cold spraying”, Surface and Coatings Technology, vol. 167, Issues 2-3, 2003, pp. 278-283. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190316262 A1 | Oct 2019 | US |