This invention relates generally to microfabrication technology and, more specifically, to coaxial transmission line microstructures and to methods of forming such microstructures using a sequential build process. The invention has particular applicability to devices for transmitting electromagnetic energy and other electronic signals.
The formation of three-dimensional microstructures by sequential build processes has been described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 7,012,489, to Sherrer et al (the '489 patent). The '489 patent discloses a coaxial transmission line microstructure formed by a sequential build process. The microstructure is formed on a substrate and includes an outer conductor, a center conductor and one or more dielectric support members which support the center conductor. The volume between the inner and outer conductors is gaseous or vacuous, formed by removal of a sacrificial material from the structure which previously filled such volume.
For communication between the coaxial transmission line microstructures and the outside world, a connection between the coaxial transmission line and an external element is needed. The transmission line may, for example, be connected to a radio frequency (RF) or direct current (DC) cable, which in turn may be connected to another RF or DC cable, an RF module, an RF or DC source, a sub-system, a system and the like. In embodiments, the term “RF” should be understood to mean any frequency being propagated, specifically including microwave and millimeter wave frequencies.
Structures and methods for such external connection are not currently known in the art. In this regard, the process of connecting an external element to a coaxial transmission line microstructure is fraught with problems. Generally, the microstructures and standard connector terminations differ significantly in size. For example, the inner diameter of the outer conductor and outer diameter of the center conductor of a coaxial transmission line microstructure are typically on the order of 100 to 1000 microns and 25 to 400 microns, respectively. In contrast, the inner diameter of the outer conductor of a standard connector such as a 3.5 mm, 2.4 mm, 1 mm, GPPO (Corning Inc.), Subminature A (SMA), K (Anritsu Colo.), or W (Anritsu Colo.) connector is generally on the order of 1 mm or more, with the outer diameter of the inner conductor being determined by the impedance of the connector. Typically, microfabricated coaxial transmission lines have dimensions that may be from two to more than ten times smaller than the smallest of these standard connectors. Given the rather large difference in size between the microstructure and connector, a simple joining of the two structures is not possible. Such a junction typically produces attenuation, radiation, and reflection of the propagating waves to a degree that is not acceptable for most applications. A microfabricated transition structure allowing mechanical joining of the two structures while preserving the desired transmission properties, such as low insertion loss and low return reflections over the operating frequencies would thus be desired.
Adding to the difficulty of microstructure connectivity is the relatively delicate nature of the microstructures when considering the forces typically exerted on such connectors. The microstructures are formed from a number of relatively thin layers, with the center conductor being suspended in a gaseous or vacuous core volume within the outer conductor. Although periodic dielectric members are provided in the described microstructures to support the center conductor along its length, the microstructures are still susceptible to breakage and failure caused by excessive mechanical stresses. Such stresses would be expected to result from external forces applied to the microstructures during connection with large external components such as repeated mating with standard connectors.
Still further, when transitioning between the coaxial transmission line and another element through which an electric and/or electromagnetic signal is communicated, signal loss due to attenuation and return reflection can be problematic. In addition to loss of signal, return reflection can cause failure of circuits and/or failure of circuits to perform properly. Accordingly, a transition structure which allows for coupling of coaxial transmission line microstructures to external elements which preserves the desired transmission properties over the frequencies of operation without significant signal degradation due, for example, to attenuation and reflections is desired.
There is thus a need in the art for improved coaxial transmission line microstructures and for their methods of formation which would address one or more problems associated with the state of the art.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention, provided are coaxial transmission line microstructures formed by a sequential build process. The microstructures include: a center conductor; an outer conductor disposed around the center conductor; a non-solid volume between the center conductor and the outer conductor; and a transition structure for transitioning between the coaxial transmission line and an electrical connector.
In accordance with further aspects of the invention, the transition structure may include an end portion of the center conductor, wherein the end portion has an increased dimension along an axis thereof, and an enlarged region of the outer conductor adapted to attach to the electrical connector, the end portion of the center conductor being disposed in the enlarged region of the outer conductor. The non-solid volume is typically vacuum, air or other gas. The coaxial transmission line microstructure is typically formed over a substrate which may form part of the microstructure. Optionally, the microstructure may be removed from a substrate on which it is formed. Such removed microstructure may be disposed on a different substrate. The coaxial transmission line microstructure may further include a support member in contact with the end portion of the center conductor for supporting the end portion. The support member may be formed of or include a dielectric material. The support member may be formed of a metal pedestal electrically isolating the center conductor and outer conductor by one or more intervening dielectric layers. The support member may take the form of a pedestal disposed beneath the end portion of the center conductor. At least a portion of the coaxial transmission line may have a rectangular coaxial (rectacoax) structure.
In accordance with further aspects of the invention, connectorized coaxial transmission line microstructures are provided. Such microstructures include a coaxial transmission line microstructure as described above, and an electric connector connected to the center conductor and the outer conductor. The connectorized microstructures may further include a rigid member to which the connector is attached.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention, provided are methods of forming a coaxial transmission line microstructure. The methods include: disposing a plurality of layers over a substrate, wherein the layers comprise one or more of dielectric, conductive and sacrificial materials; and forming from the layers a center conductor, an outer conductor disposed around the center conductor, a non-solid volume between the center conductor and the outer conductor and a transition structure for transitioning between the coaxial transmission line and an electric connector.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent to one skilled in the art upon review of the following description, claims, and drawings appended hereto.
The present invention will be discussed with reference to the following drawings, in which like reference numerals denote like features, and in which:
The exemplary processes to be described involve a sequential build to create three-dimensional microstructures. The term “microstructure” refers to structures formed by microfabrication processes, typically on a wafer or grid-level. In the sequential build processes of the invention, a microstructure is formed by sequentially layering and processing various materials and in a predetermined manner. When implemented, for example, with film formation, lithographic patterning, deposition, etching and other optional processes such as planarization techniques, a flexible method to form a variety of three-dimensional microstructures is provided.
The sequential build process is generally accomplished through processes including various combinations of: (a) metal, sacrificial material (e.g., photoresist) and dielectric coating processes; (b) surface planarization; (c) photolithography; and (d) etching or planarization or other removal processes. In depositing metal, plating techniques are particularly useful, although other metal deposition techniques such as physical vapor deposition (PVD), screen printing and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) techniques may be used, the choice dependent on the dimensions of the coaxial structures, and the materials deployed.
The exemplary embodiments of the invention are described herein in the context of the manufacture of transition structures for allowing electric and/or electromagnetic connection between coaxial transmission line microstructures and external components. Such a structure finds application, for example, in the telecommunications and data communications industry, in chip to chip and interchip interconnect and passive components, in radar systems, and in microwave and millimeter-wave devices and subsystems. It should be clear, however, that the technology described for creating microstructures is in no way limited to the exemplary structures or applications but may be used in numerous fields for microdevices such as in pressure sensors, rollover sensors, mass spectrometers, filters, microfluidic devices, heat sinks, hermetic packages, surgical instruments, blood pressure sensors, air flow sensors, hearing aid sensors, micromechanical sensors, image stabilizers, altitude sensors and autofocus sensors. The invention can be used as a general method for fabricating transitions between microstructural elements for transmission of electric and/or electromagnetic signals and power with external components through a connector, for example, a microwave connector. The exemplified coaxial transmission line microstructures and related waveguides are useful for propagation of electromagnetic energy having a frequency, for example, of from several MHz to 200 GHz or more, including radio frequency waves, millimeter waves and microwaves. The described transmission lines find further use in providing a simultaneous DC or lower frequency voltage, for example, in providing a bias to integrated or attached semiconductor devices.
The invention will now be described with reference to
The transition structure 4 of the microstructure 2 provides a larger geometry and lends mechanical support to the microstructure allowing for coupling to an electrical connector 6 (
Advantageously, standard off-the-shelf surface mountable connectors may be coupled to the microstructures of the invention. As shown for example in an aspect of embodiments at least in
The transition structure 4 can take various forms. Persons skilled in the art, given the exemplary structures and description herein, will understand that other designs may be employed. As shown, both the center conductor 10 and outer conductor 12 have an increased dimension at respective end portions 36, 38 so as to be complementary in geometry to the center conductor 28 and outer conductor 30 of the electrical connector with which connection is to be made. For the center conductor, this increase in dimension is typically in the form of an increase in width, achieved by tapering the end portion of the center conductor from that of the transmission line standard width to that of the connector center conductor 28. In this case, the exemplified center conductor end portion 36 also has an increase in the height dimension such that its height is the same as the outer conductor in the transition structure for purposes of bonding to the connector. One or more solder layers 39, for example illustrated in an aspect of embodiments at least in
As with other regions of the transmission line microstructure, the center conductor is suspended in the transition structure with a support structure. However, as a result of the geometrical change of the center conductor and increased mass in the transition structure 4, the load of the transmission line in the transition structure can be significantly greater than that in other regions of the transmission line. As such, the design of a suitable support structure for the center conductor end portion 36 will generally differ from that of the dielectric support members 14a used in the main regions of the transmission line. The design of the support structure for the end portion 36 may take various forms and will depend on the mechanical loads and stresses as a result of its mass and environment, as well as the added mechanical forces it may be subject to as a result of the attachment and use of the connector structure, particularly those associated with the center conductor 28. In this exemplified structure for the end portion, the support structure for the end portion takes the form of plural dielectric support members 14b, which may be in the form of straps as illustrated in
A further design for a suitable support structure for the center conductor end portion 36 is illustrated in
As an alternative to or in addition to a sidewall-anchored support structure such those described above for the transition center conductor end portion, a structure for supporting the end portion from below may be employed.
In accordance with a further aspect of the invention and as described in greater detail below, the coaxial transmission line microstructure may be released from the substrate 8 of
While being larger in geometry than the transmission line microstructures, the electrical connectors 6 are still of a sufficiently small size making them difficult to handle manually. For ease of handling and to reduce the mechanical stress and strain of connection to the microstructures, particularly in the case of released microstructures, a connector frame may be provided as shown in
The frame may further include a ring-, rectangular- or other-shaped structure 57, for example illustrated in an aspect of embodiments at least in
Exemplary methods of forming the coaxial transmission line microstructure of
The sacrificial photosensitive material can be, for example, a negative photoresist such as Shipley BPR™ 100 or PHOTOPOSIT™ SN, and LAMINAR™ dry films, commercially available from Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC. Particularly suitable photosensitive materials are described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,054,252. Suitable binders for the sacrificial photosensitive material include, for example: binder polymers prepared by free radical polymerization of acrylic acid and/or methacrylic acid with one or more monomers chosen from acrylate monomers, methacrylate monomers and vinyl aromatic monomers (acrylate polymers); acrylate polymers esterified with alcohols bearing (meth)acrylic groups, such as 2-hydroxyethyl(meth)acrylate, SB495B (Sartomer), Tone M-100 (Dow Chemical) or Tone M-210 (Dow Chemical); copolymers of styrene and maleic anhydride which have been converted to the half ester by reaction with an alcohol; copolymers of styrene and maleic anhydride which have been converted to the half ester by reaction with alcohols bearing (meth)acrylic groups, such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, SB495B (Sartomer), Tone M-100 (Dow Chemical) or Tone M-210 (Dow Chemical); and combinations thereof. Particularly suitable binder polymers include: copolymers of butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid and copolymers of ethyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid; copolymers of butyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid and copolymers of ethyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate and methacrylic acid esterified with alcohols bearing methacrylic groups, such as 2-hydroxyethyl(meth)acrylate, SB495B (Sartomer), Tone M-100 (Dow Chemical) or Tone M-210 (Dow Chemical); copolymers of styrene and maleic anhydride such as SMA 1000F or SMA 3000F (Sartomer) that have been converted to the half ester by reaction with alcohols such as 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate, SB495B (Sartomer), Tone M-100 (Dow Chemical) or Tone M-210 (Dow Chemical), such as Sarbox SB405 (Sartomer); and combinations thereof.
Suitable photoinitiator systems for the sacrificial photosensitive compositions include Irgacure 184, Duracur 1173, Irgacure 651, Irgacure 907, Duracur ITX (all of Ciba Specialty Chemicals) and combinations thereof. The photosensitive compositions may include additional components, such as dyes, for example, methylene blue, leuco crystal violet, or Oil Blue N; additives to improve adhesion such as benzotriazole, benzimidazole, or benzoxizole; and surfactants such as Fluorad® FC-4430 (3M), Silwet L-7604 (GE), and Zonyl FSG (DuPont).
The thickness of the sacrificial photosensitive material layers in this and other steps will depend on the dimensions of the structures being fabricated, but are typically from 1 to 250 microns per layer, and in the case of the embodiments shown are more typically from 20 to 100 microns per strata or layer.
The developer material will depend on the material of the photoresist. Typical developers include, for example, TMAH developers such as the Microposit™ family of developers (Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials) such as Microposit MF-312, MF-26A, MF-321, MF-326W and MF-CD26 developers.
As shown in
The thickness of the base layer 16 (and the subsequently formed other walls of the outer conductor) is selected to provide mechanical stability to the microstructure and to provide sufficient conductivity of the transmission line to provide sufficiently low loss. At microwave frequencies and beyond, structural influences become more pronounced, as the skin depth will typically be less than 1 μm. The thickness thus will depend, for example, on the specific base layer material, the particular frequency to be propagated and the intended application. In instances in which the final structure is to be removed from the substrate, it may be beneficial to employ a relatively thick base layer, for example, from about 20 to 150 μm or from 20 to 80 μm, for structural integrity. Where the final structure is to remain intact with the substrate, it may be desired to employ a relatively thin base layer which may be determined by the skin depth requirements of the frequencies used. In addition, a material with suitable mechanical properties may be chosen for the structure, and then it can be overcoated with a highly conductive material for its electrical properties. For example, nickel base structures can be overcoated with gold or silver using an electrolytic or more typically an electroless plating process. Alternatively, the base structure may be overcoated with materials for other desired surface properties. For example, copper may be overcoated with electroless nickel and gold, or electroless silver, to help prevent oxidation. Other methods and materials for overcoating may be employed as are known in the art to obtain, for example, one or more of the target mechanical, chemical, electrical and corrosion-protective properties.
Appropriate materials and techniques for forming the sidewalls are the same as those mentioned above with respect to the base layer. The sidewalls are typically formed of the same material used in forming the base layer 16, although different materials may be employed. In the case of a plating process, the application of a seed layer or plating base may be omitted as here when metal in a subsequent step will only be applied directly over a previously formed, exposed metal region. It should be clear, however, that the exemplified structures shown in the figures typically make up only a small area of a particular device, and metallization of these and other structures may be started on any layer in the process sequence, in which case seed layers are typically used.
Surface planarization at this stage and/or in subsequent stages can be performed in order to remove any unwanted metal deposited on the top surface or above the sacrificial material, providing a flat surface for subsequent processing. Conventional planarization techniques, for example, chemical-mechanical-polishing (CMP), lapping, or a combination of these methods are typically used. Other known planarization or mechanical forming techniques, for example, mechanical finishing such as mechanical machining, diamond turning, plasma etching, laser ablation, and the like, may additionally or alternatively be used. Through surface planarization, the total thickness of a given layer can be controlled more tightly than might otherwise be achieved through coating alone. For example, a CMP process can be used to planarize the metal and the sacrificial material to the same level. This may be followed, for example, by a lapping process, which slowly removes metal, sacrificial material, and any dielectric at the same rate, allowing for greater control of the final thickness of the layer.
With reference to
As shown in
A layer 14 of a dielectric material is next deposited over the second sacrificial layer 60b and the lower sidewall portions 18, as shown in
Referring to
The dielectric support members 14a and 14b may be patterned with geometries allowing for the elements of the microstructure to be maintained in mechanically locked engagement with each other, reducing the possibility of their pulling away from the outer conductor. In the exemplified microstructure, the dielectric support members 14a are patterned in the form of a “T” shape at each end (or an “I” shape) during the patterning process. Although not shown, such a structure may optionally be used for the transition dielectric support members 14b. During subsequent processing, the top portions 66 of the T structures become embedded in the wall of the outer conductor and function to anchor the support members therein, rendering them more resistant to separation from the outer conductor. While the illustrated structure includes an anchor-type locking structure at each end of the dielectric support members 14a, it should be clear that such a structure may be used at a single end thereof. Further, the dielectric support members may optionally include an anchor portion on a single end in an alternating pattern. Reentrant profiles and other geometries providing an increase in cross-sectional geometry in the depthwise direction are typical. In addition, open structures, such as vias, in the central region of the dielectric pattern may be used to allow mechanical interlocking with subsequent metal regions to be formed.
With reference to
As illustrated in
With reference to
As illustrated in
With reference to
As shown in
Metallization is prevented at least in the volume occupied by the sacrificial material regions 82, for example illustrated in an aspect of embodiments at least in
To allow for bonding of the electrical connector 6 to the transition structure 4, one or more solderable layers 39 may be formed on the bonding surfaces of the transition structure as shown in
With the basic structure of the transmission line being complete, additional layers may be added, for example, to create additional transmission lines or waveguides that may be interconnected to the first exemplary layer. Other layers such as the solders may optionally be added.
Once the construction is complete, the sacrificial material remaining in the structure may next be removed. The sacrificial material may be removed by known strippers based on the type of material used. Suitable strippers include, for example: commercial stripping solutions such as Surfacestrip™ 406-1, Surfacestrip™. 446-1, or Surfacestrip™ 448 (Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials); aqueous solutions of strong bases such as sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, or tetramethylammonium hydroxide; aqueous solutions of strong bases containing ethanol or monoethanolamine; aqueous solutions of strong bases containing ethanol or monoethanolamine and a strong solvent such as N-methylpyrrolidone or N,N-dimethylformamide; and aqueous solutions of tetramethylammonium hydroxide, N-methylpyrrolidone and monoethanolamine or ethanol.
In order for the material to be removed from the microstructure, the stripper is brought into contact with the sacrificial material. The sacrificial material may be exposed at the end faces of the transmission line structure. Additional openings in the transmission line such as described above may be provided to facilitate contact between the stripper and sacrificial material throughout the structure. Other structures for allowing contact between the sacrificial material and stripper are envisioned. For example, openings can be formed in the transmission line sidewalls during the patterning process. The dimensions of these openings may be selected to minimize interference with, scattering or leakage of the guided wave. The dimensions can, for example, be selected to be less than ⅛, 1/10 or 1/20 of the wavelength of the highest frequency used. The impact of such openings can readily be calculated and can be optimized using software such as HFSS made by Ansoft, Inc.
The final transmission line microstructure 2 after removal of the sacrificial resist is shown in
The connector 6, for example illustrated in an aspect of embodiments at least at
Bonding of the connector to the transition structure may optionally be conducted with the use of a conductive adhesive, for example, a silver-filled epoxy or nano-sized metal particle paste. Conductive adhesives are also available as an anisotropic conductive film or paste, wherein the conductive particle film or paste conduct only in one direction. The direction is determined by, for example, application of pressure or a magnetic field. This approach allows an easier method to align the connector and the microstructure as overflow of the material into surrounding regions will not produce electrical shorting.
For certain applications, it may be beneficial to separate the final transmission line microstructure from the substrate to which it is attached. This may be done prior to or after attachment of the connector. Release of the transmission line microstructure would allow for coupling to another substrate, for example, a gallium arsenide die such as a monolithic microwave integrated circuits or other devices. Such release also allows structures such as connectors and antennae to be on opposite sides of the microstructure without the need to machine through a substrate material. As shown previously in
While the exemplified transmission lines include a center conductor formed over the dielectric support members 14a, 14b, it is envisioned that they can be disposed within the center conductor such as in a split center conductor using a geometry such as a plus (+)-shape, a T-shape or a box. The support members 14a may be formed over the center conductor in addition or as an alternative to the underlying dielectric support members. Further, the support members 14a, 14b may take the form of a pedestal, providing support from any of the surrounding surfaces when placed between a center conductor and a surrounding surface.
The transmission lines of the invention typically are square in cross-section. Other shapes, however, are envisioned. For example, other rectangular transmission lines can be obtained in the same manner the square transmission lines are formed, except making the width and height of the transmission lines different. Rounded transmission lines, for example, circular or partially rounded transmission lines can be formed by use of gray-scale patterning. Such rounded transmission lines can, for example, be created through conventional lithography for vertical transitions and might be used to more readily interface with external micro-coaxial conductors, to make connector interfaces, etc.
A plurality of transmission lines as described above may be formed in a stacked arrangement, with the understanding that the transition structure would typically be disposed so that the connector structure can make electrical contact with the transition structure. The stacked arrangement can be achieved by continuation of the sequential build process through each stack, or by preforming the transmission lines on individual substrates, separating transmission line structures from their respective substrates using a release layer, and stacking the structures. Such stacked structures can be joined by thin layers of solders or conductive adhesives. In theory, there is not a limit on the number of transmission lines that can be stacked using the process steps discussed herein. In practice, however, the number of layers will be limited by the ability to manage the thicknesses and stresses and, if they are built monolithically, the resist removal associated with each additional layer. While coaxial waveguide microstructures have been shown in the exemplified devices, the structures such as hollow-core waveguides, antenna elements, cavities, and so forth can also be constructed using the described methods and may be interspersed with the connector shown.
While some of the illustrated transmission line microstructures show a single transmission line and connector, it should be clear that a plurality of such transmission lines each to be joined to a plurality of connectors are typical. Further, such structures are typically manufactured on a wafer- or grid-level as a plurality of die. The microstructures and methods of the invention find use, for example, in: microwave and millimeter wave active and passive components and subsystems, in microwave amplifiers, in satellite communications, in data and telecommunications such as point to point data links, in microwave and millimeter wave filters and couplers; in aerospace and military applications, in radar and collision avoidance systems, and communications systems; in automotive pressure and/or rollover sensors; chemistry in mass spectrometers and filters; biotechnology and biomedical in filters, in wafer or grid level electrical probing, in gyroscopes and accelerometers, in microfluidic devices, in surgical instruments and blood pressure sensing, in air flow and hearing aid sensors; and consumer electronics such as in image stabilizers, altitude sensors, and autofocus sensors.
While the invention has been described in detail with reference to specific embodiments thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be made, and equivalents employed, without departing from the scope of the claims.
This application is a continuation of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/680,345 filed on Apr. 7, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,570,789 issued Feb. 14, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/029,252, filed on Sep. 17, 2013, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,000,863 issued Apr. 7, 2015 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/015,671, filed on Jan. 28, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,542,079 issued Sep. 24, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/077,546, filed Mar. 20, 2008 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,898,356 issued Mar. 1, 2011, which claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/919,124, filed Mar. 20, 2007, the entire contents of each of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3157847 | Williams | Nov 1964 | A |
3526867 | Keeler | Sep 1970 | A |
4539534 | Hudspeth | Sep 1985 | A |
4647878 | Landis | Mar 1987 | A |
4677393 | Sharma | Jun 1987 | A |
4684181 | Massit | Aug 1987 | A |
4859806 | Smith | Aug 1989 | A |
4909909 | Florjancic | Mar 1990 | A |
4915983 | Lake | Apr 1990 | A |
5089880 | Meyer | Feb 1992 | A |
5213511 | Sobhani | May 1993 | A |
5299939 | Walker | Apr 1994 | A |
5312456 | Reed | May 1994 | A |
5529504 | Greenstein | Jun 1996 | A |
5903059 | Bertin | May 1999 | A |
6101705 | Wolfson | Aug 2000 | A |
6183268 | Consoli | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6889433 | Enomoto | May 2005 | B1 |
7116190 | Brunker | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7383632 | Dittmann | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7628617 | Brown | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7645147 | Dittmann | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7741853 | Blakely | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8641428 | Light | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8888504 | Pischler | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9306254 | Hovey | Apr 2016 | B1 |
9505613 | Sherrer | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9633976 | Bernstein | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9888600 | Hovey | Feb 2018 | B2 |
20010040051 | Lipponen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020127768 | Badir | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040003524 | Ha | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050013977 | Wong | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20090004385 | Blackwell | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20160054385 | Suto | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2003032007 | Jan 2003 | JP |
2005112105 | Nov 2005 | WO |
2009013751 | Jan 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
T.E. Durham, “An 8-40GHz Wideband Instrument for Snow Measurements,” Earth Science Technology Forum, Pasadena, CA, Jun. 2011. |
Written Opinion corresponding to PCT/US12/46734 dated Nov. 20, 2012. |
Y. Saito, D. Fontaine, J.-M. Rollin, D.S. Filipovic, “Monolithic micro-coaxial power dividers,” Electronic Letts., Apr. 2009, pp. 469-470. |
Y. Saito, J.R. Mruk, J.-M. Rollin, D.S. Filipovic, “X- through Q-band log-periodic antenna with monolithically integrated u-coaxial impedance transformer/feeder,” Electronic Letts. Jul. 2009, pp. 775-776. |
Y. Saito, M.V. Lukic, D. Fontaine, J.-M. Rollin, D.S. Filipovic, “Monolithically Integrated Corporate-Fed Cavity-Backed Antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 57, No. 9, Sep. 2009, pp. 2583-2590. |
Z. Popovic, “Micro-coaxial micro-fabricated feeds for phased array antennas,” in IEEE Int. Symp. on Phased Array Systems and Technology, Waltham, MA, Oct. 2010, pp. 1-10. (Invited). |
Z. Popovic, K. Vanhille, N. Ehsan, E. Cullens, Y. Saito, J.-M. Rollin, C. Nichols, D. Sherrer, D. Fontaine, D. Filipovic, “Micro-fabricated micro-coaxial millimeter-wave components,” in 2008 Int. Conf. on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves, Pasadena, CA, Sep. 2008, pp. 1-3. |
Z. Popovic, S. Rondineau, D. Filipovic, D. Sherrer, C. Nichols, J.-M. Rollin, and K. Vanhille, “An enabling new 3D architecture for microwave components and systems,” Microwave Journal, Feb. 2008, pp. 66-86. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/011789 dated Apr. 10, 2015. |
Derwent Abstract Translation of WO-2010-011911 A2 (published 2010). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated May 19, 2006 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665. |
International Search Report dated Aug. 29, 2005 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665. |
Jeong, I., et al., “High Performance Air-Gap Transmission Lines and Inductors for Milimeter-Wave Applications”, Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 50, No. 12, Dec. 2002. |
Lukic, M. et al., “Surface-micromachined dual Ka-band cavity backed patch antennas,” IEEE Trans. AtennasPropag., vol. 55, pp. 2107-2110, Jul. 2007. |
Oliver, J.M. et al., “A 3-D micromachined W-band cavity backed patch antenna array with integrated rectacoax transition to wave guide,” 2009 Proc. IEEE International Microwave Symposium, Boston, MA 2009. |
PwrSoC Update 2012: Technology, Challenges, and Opportunities for Power Supply on Chip, Presentation (Mar. 18, 2013). |
Rollin, J.M. et al., “A membrane planar diode for 200GHz mixing applications,” 29th International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, pp. 205-206, Karlsrube, 2004. |
Rollin, J.M. et al., “Integrated Schottky diode for a sub-harmonic mixer at millimetre wavelengths,” 31st International Conference on Infrared and Millimeter Waves and Terahertz Electronics, Paris, 2006. |
Saito, Y., Fontaine, D., Rollin, J-M., Filipovic, D., ‘Micro-Coaxial Ka-Band Gysel Power Dividers,’ Microwave Opt Technol Lett 52: 474-478, 2010, Feb. 2010. |
Saito et al., “Analysis and design of monolithic rectangular coaxial lines for minimum coupling,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 55, pp. 2521-2530, Dec. 2007. |
Sherrer, D, Vanhille, K, Rollin, J.M., ‘PolyStrata Technology: A Disruptive Approach for 3D Microwave Components and Modules,’ Presentation (Apr. 23, 2010). |
Vanhille, K., ‘Design and Characterization of Microfabricated Three-Dimensional Millimeter-Wave Components,’ Dissertation, 2007. |
Vanhille, K. et al., ‘Balanced low-loss Ka-band-coaxial hybrids,’ IEEE MTT-S Dig., Honolulu, Hawaii, Jun. 2007. |
Vanhille, K. et al., “Ka-Band surface mount directional coupler fabricated using micro-rectangular coaxial transmission lines,” 2008 Proc. IEEE International Microwave Symposium, 2008. |
Vanhille, K.J. et al., “Ka-band miniaturized quasi-planar high-Q resonators,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 55, No. 6, pp. 1272-1279, Jun. 2007. |
Vyas R. et al., “Liquid Crystal Polymer (LCP): The ultimate solution for low-cost RF flexible electronics and antennas,” Antennas and Propagation Society, International Symposium, p. 1729-1732 (2007). |
Wang, H. et al., “Design of a low integrated sub-harmonic mixer at 183GHz using European Schottky diode technology,” From Proceedings of the 4th ESA workshop on Millimetre-Wave Technology and Applications, pp. 249-252, Espoo, Finland, Feb. 2006. |
Wang, H. et al., “Power-amplifier modules covering 70-113 GHz using MMICs,” IEEE Trans Microwave Theory and Tech., vol. 39, pp. 9-16, Jan. 2001. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority dated Aug. 29, 2005 on corresponding PCT/US04/06665. |
“Multiplexer/LNA Module using PolyStrata®,” GOMACTech-15, Mar. 26, 2015. |
“Shiffman phase shifters designed to work over a 15-45GHz range,” phys.org, Mar. 2014. [online: http://phys.org/wire-news/156496085/schiffman-phase-shifters-designed-to-work-over-a-15-45ghz-range.html]. |
A. Boryssenko, J. Arroyo, R. Reid, M.S. Heimbeck, “Substrate free G-band Vivaldi antenna array design, fabrication and testing” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, Tucson, Sep. 2014. |
A. Boryssenko, K. Vanhille, “300-GHz microfabricated waveguide slotted arrays” 2014 IEEE International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, Tucson, Sep. 2014. |
A.A. Immorlica Jr., R. Actis, D. Nair, K. Vanhille, C. Nichols, J.-M. Rollin, D. Fleming, R. Varghese, D. Sherrer, D. Filipovic, E. Cullens, N. Ehsan, and Z. Popovic, “Miniature 3D micromachined solid state amplifiers,” in 2008 IEEE International Conference on Microwaves, Communications, Antennas, and Electronic Systems, Tel-Aviv, Israel, May 2008, pp. 1-7. |
B. Cannon, K. Vanhille, “Microfabricated Dual-Polarized, W-band Antenna Architecture for Scalable Line Array Feed,” 2015 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2015. |
D. Filipovic, G. Potvin, D. Fontaine, C. Nichols, Z. Popovic, S. Rondineau, M. Lukic, K. Vanhille, Y. Saito, D. Sherrer, W. Wilkins, E. Daniels, E. Adler, and J. Evans, “Integrated micro-coaxial Ka-band antenna and array,” GomacTech 2007 Conference, Mar. 2007. |
D. Filipovic, G. Potvin, D. Fontaine, Y. Saito, J.-M. Rollin, Z. Popovic, M. Lukic, K. Vanhille, C. Nichols, “Ã?Âμ-coaxial phased arrays for Ka-Band Communications,” Antenna Applications Symposium, Monticello, IL, Sep. 2008, pp. 104-115. |
D. Filipovic, Z. Popovic, K. Vanhille, M. Lukic, S. Rondineau, M. Buck, G. Potvin, D. Fontaine, C. Nichols, D. Sherrer, S. Zhou, W. Houck, D. Fleming, E. Daniel, W. Wilkins, V. Sokolov, E. Adler, and J. Evans, “Quasi-planar rectangular μ-coaxial structures for mm-wave applications,” Proc. GomacTech., pp. 28-31, San Diego, Mar. 2006. |
D. Sherrer, “Improving electronics' functional density,” MICROmanufacturing, May/Jun. 2015, pp. 16-18. |
D.S. Filipovic, M. Lukic, Y. Lee and D. Fontaine, “Monolithic rectangular coaxial lines and resonators with embedded dielectric support,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 18, No. 11, pp. 740-742, 2008. |
E. Cullens, “Microfabricated Broadband Components for Microwave Front Ends,” Thesis, 2011. |
E. Cullens, K. Vanhille, Z. Popovic, “Miniature bias-tee networks integrated in microcoaxial lines,” in Proc. 40th European Microwave Conf., Paris, France, Sep. 2010, pp. 413-416. |
E. Cullens, L. Ranzani, E. Grossman, Z. Popovic, “G-Band Frequency Steering Antenna Array Design and Measurements,” Proceedings of the XXXth URSI General Assembly, Istanbul, Turkey, Aug. 2011. |
E. Cullens, L. Ranzani, K. Vanhille, E. Grossman, N. Ehsan, Z. Popovic, “Micro-Fabricated 130-180 GHz frequency scanning waveguide arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Aug. 2012, vol. 60, No. 8, pp. 3647-3653. |
European Examination Report of EP App. No. 07150463.3 dated Feb. 16, 2015. |
European Search Report of corresponding European Patent Application No. 08 15 3144 dated Jul. 2, 2008. |
Extended EP Search Report for EP Application No. 12811132.5 dated Feb. 5, 2016. |
H. Kazemi, “350mW G-band Medium Power Amplifier Fabricated Through a New Method of 3D-Copper Additive Manufacturing,” IEEE 2015. |
H. Kazemi, “Ultra-compact G-band 16way Power Splitter/Combiner Module Fabricated Through a New Method of 3D-Copper Additive Manufacturing,” IEEE 2015. |
H. Zhou, N. A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “Surface micromachined millimeter-wave log-periodic dipole array antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., Oct. 2012, vol. 60, No. 10, pp. 4573-4581. |
H. Zhou, N. A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “Wideband W-band patch antenna,” 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation , Rome, Italy, Apr. 2011, pp. 1518-1521. |
H. Zhou, N.A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “W-band endfire log periodic dipole array,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Spokane, WA, Jul. 2011, pp. 1233-1236. |
Horton, M.C., et al., “The Digital Elliptic Filter—A Compact Sharp-Cutoff Design for Wide Bandstop or Bandpass Requirements,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, (1967) MTT-15:307-314. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2015/063192 dated May 20, 2016. |
International Search Report corresponding to PCT/US12/46734 dated Nov. 20, 2012. |
J. M. Oliver, J.-M. Rollin, K. Vanhille, S. Raman, “A W-band micromachined 3-D cavity-backed patch antenna array with integrated diode detector,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Feb. 2012, vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 284-292. |
J. M. Oliver, P. E. Ralston, E. Cullens, L. M. Ranzani, S. Raman, K. Vanhille, “A W-band Micro-coaxial Passive Monopulse Comparator Network with Integrated Cavity-Backed Patch Antenna Array,” 2011 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Baltimore, MD, Jun. 2011. |
J. Mruk, “Wideband Monolithically Integrated Front-End Subsystems and Components,” Thesis, 2011. |
J. Mruk, Z. Hongyu, M. Uhm, Y. Saito, D. Filipovic, “Wideband mm-Wave Log-Periodic Antennas,” 3rd European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, pp. 2284-2287, Mar. 2009. |
J. Oliver, “3D Micromachined Passive Components and Active Circuit Integration for Millimeter-Wave Radar Applications,” Thesis, Feb. 10, 2011. |
J. R. Mruk, H. Zhou, H. Levitt, D. Filipovic, “Dual wideband monolithically integrated millimeter-wave passive front-end sub-systems,” in 2010 Int. Conf. on Infrared, Millimeter and Terahertz Waves , Sep. 2010, pp. 1-2. |
J. R. Mruk, N. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “Micro-coaxial fed 18 to 110 GHz planar log-periodic antennas with RF transitions,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, No. 2, Feb. 2014, pp. 968-972. |
J. Reid, “PolyStrata Millimeter-wave Tunable Filters,” GOMACTech-12, Mar. 22, 2012. |
J.M. Oliver, H. Kazemi, J.-M. Rollin, D. Sherrer, S. Huettner, S. Raman, “Compact, low-loss, micromachined rectangular coaxial millimeter-wave power combining networks,” 2013 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Seattle, WA, Jun. 2013. |
J.R. Mruk, Y. Saito, K. Kim, M. Radway, D. Filipovic, “A directly fed Ku- to W-band 2-arm Archimedean spiral antenna,” Proc. 41st European Microwave Conf., Oct. 2011, pp. 539-542. |
J.R. Reid, D. Hanna, R.T. Webster, “A 40/50 GHz diplexer realized with three dimensional copper micromachining,” in 2008 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp., Atlanta, GA, Jun. 2008, pp. 1271-1274. |
J.R. Reid, J.M. Oliver, K. Vanhille, D. Sherrer, “Three dimensional metal micromachining: A disruptive technology for millimeter-wave filters,” 2012 IEEE Topical Meeting on Silicon Monolithic Integrated Circuits in RF Systems, Jan. 2012. |
K. J. Vanhille, D. L. Fontaine, C. Nichols, D. S. Filipovic, and Z. Popovic, “Quasi-planar high-Q millimeter-wave resonators,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 54, No. 6, pp. 2439-2446, Jun. 2006. |
K. M. Lambert, F. A. Miranda, R. R. Romanofsky, T. E. Durham, K. J. Vanhille, “Antenna characterization for the Wideband Instrument for Snow Measurements (WISM),” 2015 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2015. |
K. Vanhille, “Design and Characterization of Microfabricated Three-Dimensional Millimeter-Wave Components,” Thesis, 2007. |
K. Vanhille, M. Buck, Z. Popovic, and D.S. Filipovic, “Miniature Ka-band recta-coax components: analysis and design,” presented at 2005 AP-S/URSI Symposium, Washington, DC, Jul. 2005. |
K. Vanhille, M. Lukic, S. Rondineau, D. Filipovic, and Z. Popovic, “Integrated micro-coaxial passive components for millimeter-wave antenna front ends,” 2007 Antennas, Radar, and Wave Propagation Conference, May 2007. |
K. Vanhille, T. Durham, W. Stacy, D. Karasiewicz, A. Caba, C. Trent, K. Lambert, F. Miranda, “A microfabricated 8-40 GHz dual-polarized reflector feed,” 2014 Antenna Applications Symposium, Monticello, IL, Sep. 2014. pp. 241-257. |
L. Ranzani, D. Kuester, K. J. Vanhille, A Boryssenko, E. Grossman, Z. Popovic, “G-Band micro-fabricated frequency-steered arrays with 2Ã?°/GHz beam steering,” IEEE Trans. on Terahertz Science and Technology, vol. 3, No. 5, Sep. 2013. |
L. Ranzani, E. D. Cullens, D. Kuester, K. J. Vanhille, E. Grossman, Z. Popovic, “W-band micro-fabricated coaxially-fed frequency scanned slot arrays,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, No. 4, Apr. 2013. |
L. Ranzani, I. Ramos, Z. Popovic, D. Maksimovic, “Microfabricated transmission-line transformers with DC isolation,” URSI National Radio Science Meeting, Boulder, CO, Jan. 2014. |
L. Ranzani, N. Ehsan, Z. Popovi?????, “G-band frequency-scanned antenna arrays,” 2010 IEEE APS-URSI International Symposium, Toronto, Canada, Jul. 2010. |
M. Lukic, D. Filipovic, “Modeling of surface roughness effects on the performance of rectangular Ã?Âμ-coaxial lines,” Proc. 22nd Ann. Rev. Prog. Applied Comp. Electromag. (ACES), pp. 620-625, Miami, Mar. 2006. |
M. Lukic, D. Fontaine, C. Nichols, D. Filipovic, “Surface micromachined Ka-band phased array antenna,” Presented at Antenna Applic. Symposium, Monticello, IL, Sep. 2006. |
M. Lukic, K. Kim, Y. Lee, Y. Saito, and D. S. Filipovic, “Multi-physics design and performance of a surface micromachined Ka-band cavity backed patch antenna,” 2007 SBMO/IEEE Int. Microwave and Optoelectronics Conf., Oct. 2007, pp. 321-324. |
M. Lukic, S. Rondineau, Z. Popovic, D. Filipovic, “Modeling of realistic rectangular Ã?Âμ-coaxial lines,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 2068-2076, May 2006. |
M. V. Lukic, and D. S. Filipovic, “Integrated cavity-backed ka-band phased array antenna,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Jun. 2007, pp. 133-135. |
M. V. Lukic, and D. S. Filipovic, “Modeling of 3-D Surface Roughness Effects With Application to Ã?Âμ-Coaxial Lines,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Mar. 2007, pp. 518-525. |
M. V. Lukic, and D. S. Filipovic, “Surface-micromachined dual Ka-and cavity backed patch antenna,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 2107-2110, Jul. 2007. |
Mruk, J.R., Filipovic, D.S, “Micro-coaxial V-/W-band filters and contiguous diplexers,” Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation, IET, Jul. 17, 2012, vol. 6, issue 10, pp. 1142-1148. |
Mruk, J.R., Saito, Y., Kim, K., Radway, M., Filipovic, D.S., “Directly fed millimetre-wave two-arm spiral antenna,” Electronics Letters, Nov. 25, 2010, vol. 46 , issue 24, pp. 1585-1587. |
N. Chamberlain, M. Sanchez Barbetty, G. Sadowy, E. Long, K. Vanhille, “A dual-polarized metal patch antenna element for phased array applications,” 2014 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Memphis, Jul. 2014. pp. 1640-1641. |
N. Ehsan, “Broadband Microwave Lithographic 3D Components,” Thesis, 2009. |
N. Ehsan, K. Vanhille, S. Rondineau, E. Cullens, Z. Popovic, “Broadband Wilkinson Dividers,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Nov. 2009, pp. 2783-2789. |
N. Ehsan, K.J. Vanhille, S. Rondineau, Z. Popovic, “Micro-coaxial impedance transformers,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., Nov. 2010, pp. 2908-2914. |
N. Jastram, “Design of a Wideband Millimeter Wave Micromachined Rotman Lens,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, No. 6, Jun. 2015. |
N. Jastram, “Wideband Millimeter-Wave Surface Micromachined Tapered Slot Antenna,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 13, 2014. |
N. Jastram, “Wideband Multibeam Millimeter Wave Arrays,” IEEE 2014. |
N. Jastram, D. Filipovic, “Monolithically integrated K/Ka array-based direction finding subsystem,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Chicago, IL, Jul. 2012, pp. 1-2. |
N. Jastram, D. S. Filipovic, “Parameter study and design of W-band micromachined tapered slot antenna,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Orlando, FL, Jul. 2013, pp. 434-435. |
N. Jastram, D. S. Filipovic, “PCB-based prototyping of 3-D micromachined RF subsystems,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, No. 1, Jan. 2014. pp. 420-429. |
N. Sutton, D.S. Filipovic, “Design of a K- thru Ka-band modified Butler matrix feed for a 4-arm spiral antenna,” 2010 Loughborough Antennas and Propagation Conference, Loughborough, UK, Nov. 2010, pp. 521-524. |
N.A. Sutton, D. S. Filipovic, “V-band monolithically integrated four-arm spiral antenna and beamforming network,” Proc. IEEE-APS/URSI Symposium, Chicago, IL, Jul. 2012, pp. 1-2. |
N.A. Sutton, J. M. Oliver, D. S. Filipovic, “Wideband 15-50 GHz symmetric multi-section coupled line quadrature hybrid based on surface micromachining technology,” 2012 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2012. |
N.A. Sutton, J.M. Oliver, D.S. Filipovic, “Wideband 18-40 GHz surface micromachined branchline quadrature hybrid,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, Sep. 2012, vol. 22, No. 9, pp. 462-464. |
P. Ralston, K. Vanhille, A. Caba, M. Oliver, S. Raman, “Test and verification of micro coaxial line power performance,” 2012 IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave, Symp., Montreal, Canada, Jun. 2012. |
P. Ralston, M. Oliver, K. Vummidi, S. Raman, “Liquid-metal vertical interconnects for flip chip assembly of GaAs C-band power amplifiers onto micro-rectangular coaxial transmission lines,” IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium, Oct. 2011. |
P. Ralston, M. Oliver, K. Vummidi, S. Raman, “Liquid-metal vertical interconnects for flip chip assembly of GaAs C-band power amplifiers onto micro-rectangular coaxial transmission lines,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Oct. 2012, vol. 47, No. 10, pp. 2327-2334. |
S. Huettner, “High Performance 3D Micro-Coax Technology,” Microwave Journal, Nov. 2013. [online: http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/21004-high-performance-3d-micro-coax-technology]. |
S. Huettner, “Transmission lines withstand vibration,” Microwaves and RF, Mar. 2011. [online: http://mwrf.com/passive-components/transmission-lines-withstand-vibration]. |
S. Scholl, C. Gorle, F. Houshmand, T. Liu, H. Lee, Y. Won, H. Kazemi, M. Asheghi, K. Goodson, “Numerical Simulation of Advanced Monolithic Microcooler Designs for High Heat Flux Microelectronics,” InterPACK, San Francisco, CA, Jul. 2015. |
S. Scholl, C. Gorle, F. Houshmand, T. Verstraete, M. Asheghi, K. Goodson, “Optimization of a microchannel geometry for cooling high heat flux microelectronics using numerical methods,” InterPACK, San Francisco, CA, Jul. 2015. |
T. Durham, H.P. Marshall, L. Tsang, P. Racette, Q. Bonds, F. Miranda, K. Vanhille, “Wideband sensor technologies for measuring surface snow,” Earthzine, Dec. 2013, [online: http://www.earthzine.org/2013/12/02/wideband-sensor-technologies-for-measuring-surface-snow/]. |
T. E. Durham, C. Trent, K. Vanhille, K. M. Lambert, F. A. Miranda, “Design of an 8-40 GHz Antenna for the Wideband Instrument for Snow Measurements (WISM),” 2015 IEEE Antenna and Propagation Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, Jul. 2015. |
T. Liu, F. Houshmand, C. Gorle, S. Scholl, H. Lee, Y. Won, H. Kazemi, K. Vanhille, M. Asheghi, K. Goodson, “Full-Scale Simulation of an Integrated Monolithic Heat Sink for Thermal Management of a High Power Density GaN—SiC Chip,” InterPACK/ICNMM, San Francisco, CA, Jul. 2015. |
Tian, et al.; Fabrication of multilayered SU8 structure for terahertz waveguide with ultralow transmission loss; Aug. 18, 2013; Dec. 10, 2013; pp. 13002-1 to 13002-6. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170200999 A1 | Jul 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60919124 | Mar 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14680345 | Apr 2015 | US |
Child | 15405799 | US | |
Parent | 14029252 | Sep 2013 | US |
Child | 14680345 | US | |
Parent | 13015671 | Jan 2011 | US |
Child | 14029252 | US | |
Parent | 12077546 | Mar 2008 | US |
Child | 13015671 | US |