Patent Grant
6866802
This invention relates generally to the manufacture of golf balls, and more particularly, to a method for preparing golf ball molds used during golf ball manufacturing.
Golf ball covers can be made by injection molding thermoplastic cover material about a core. It is standard practice in injection molding to provide a mold having two cavities, each having hemispherical surfaces that mate when the mold is closed. At the initial stage of the covering process, the core of the golf ball is supported centrally within the cavities by retractable pins or the like so as to leave a space for molding the cover about the core. A thermoplastic cover material is then injected into the mold cavity through a plurality of gates. Flow of the cover material from each of the plurality of gates eventually joins to fill the void between the golf ball core and the mold. Once the void is nearly filled, but before the cover material has completely hardened, the pins holding the core retract so that the cover material may fill the voids left by the pins. The cover material then cools and hardens to form the cover.
Referring to
In an effort to reduce the occurrence of knit lines, manufacturers have prepared molds in various ways. For example, one industry standard for making retractable pin injection molds includes first producing a hob that is formed in a lathe with a single point tool. The tool leaves radial marks or grooves on the surface of the hob. The surface of the hob is usually ground or polished to reduce the appearance of the tool marks. The hob is forced into a piece of stock to form the mold cavity and the resulting mold cavity is ground and/or polished to have a smooth appearance with a low average surface roughness of less than 10 microinches. Golf balls produced by such molds, however, have an undesirably high occurrence of knit lines.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,827,567 and 6,003,724 disclose other golf or game ball mold preparation techniques. These techniques include contacting a mold cavity with an abrasive media until substantially all of any previous coating has been removed and blasting the mold with aluminum oxide powder. These techniques prepare the mold to accept a mold release coating, which is subsequently applied to the mold cavity to fill any voids created by the blasting. These techniques have several drawbacks. First, masking may be necessary to keep coating off particular areas of the mold, such as pin holes. Masking is labor intensive. In addition, adding coating adds costs and the coating must be periodically checked and reapplied to be effective.
Injection molds may also have venting problems. Usually, such molds include a vent located at or near the intersection 18 of the knit lines 16, as shown in
One way to address unbalanced fill caused by the location and geometry of the gates is to modify the size of each gate manually using a file or the like. This solution, however, is labor intensive and its proper execution requires a great deal of skill and experience. Furthermore, such a balancing increases in difficulty as the number of cavities in the mold increase. When the mold is used with different products whose cavity size and injection moldable material may vary from that used during manual adjustment, placing new cavities in the mold may require additional adjustments, which is undesirable. In order to periodically service the cavities, they are typically removed from the mold. If the cavities are removed after manual adjustment, they may have to be returned to the same mold and same exact location in the mold to maintain the balance. This can be difficult to accomplish from a tool management perspective.
Therefore, there exists a need for a method of preparing golf ball molds for injecting molding which reduces or substantially eliminates the occurrence of knit lines, thereby increasing the durability of the golf ball cover and extending the useful life of the golf ball, without requiring manual adjustment of the gates in the mold and without significantly effecting dimples geometry or the ball finish.
The present invention is directed to a method of preparing a golf ball a method of forming a golf ball comprising forming a mold cavity; roughening the surface of the mold cavity to an average roughness of about 10 to about 200 microinches; and forming a golf ball component in the roughened cavity. The average roughness of the surface may also be between about 25 and about 100 microinches or, preferably, between about 35 and about 50 microinches.
The cavity can be roughened electrically, mechanically, or chemically, including by sand blasting or chemical etching. Typically the roughening includes directing an abrasive agent into contact with the surface. This may be accomplished by either a carrier gas or by a carrier liquid. The abrasive agent typically has a grit size between about 10 and about 200 μm, more preferably between about 75 and about 200 μm, and most preferably between about 90 and about 100 μm. The abrasive agent can include metal, metal alloys, minerals, sand, ceramic, or a mixture thereof. Preferably, the abrasive agent includes silicon carbide, tungsten carbide, granite, boron carbide, or aluminum oxide. If desired, the abrasive agent is directed at the surface at a pressure of between about 80 and about 120 psi for a time sufficient to roughen the surface, typically between about 20 and about 60 seconds.
The golf ball components of the present invention are typically injection molded. Preferably, the golf ball components are cover layers and, more preferably, are outer cover layers.
In the accompanying drawings which form a part of the specification and are to be read in conjunction therewith and in which like reference numerals are used to indicate like parts in the various views:
The present invention is directed to a method of forming a golf ball that includes roughening at least one surface of a golf ball mold containing golf ball component, such as a solid center, a multi-layer core, or a fluid-filled center. The golf ball component may further include single or multiple intermediate layers. These intermediate layers can be of a molded and/or wound construction as known by those of ordinary skill in the art. The present invention is, therefore, not limited to preparing molds for any particular golf ball construction, but is preferably used for injection molding golf ball cover layers and, in particular, outer cover layers.
Referring to
The mold 30 further includes retractable elements 32 for supporting the golf ball subassembly 34 within the cavity 22 in an extended position. The mold 30 also includes vent pins 36 disposed at the poles of the golf ball subassembly 34. The mold 30 and vent pins 36 are configured and dimensioned so that a gap g exists there between which acts as a vent for gases to exit from the cavity 22 during molding. The upper ends of the vent pins 36 form a portion of the surface 26.
The mold cavity 22 can be formed by using conventional techniques such as hydro-forming or hobbing. Preferably, the mold cavity is made of stainless steel. The present invention, however, is not limited to the above forming techniques or materials.
In step 20b, the surface 26 of the mold cavity 22 is roughened. This can be accomplished by a variety of methods including but not limited to electrical, chemical, and mechanical forming methods. Any suitable method for texturing or roughening the surface is acceptable. An example of an electrical forming method is electrical-discharge machining (“EDM”). An example of a chemical forming method is chemical etching of the surface. An example of a mechanical forming method is directing an abrasive agent into contact with the surface 22. The abrasive agent should have sufficient hardness to form a pattern in the surface.
These and other suitable methods are described in standard handbooks of the trade, such as Mechanical Engineer's Handbook at §§31.3 to 31.6 (Myer Kutz ed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1986) and Marks' Standard Handbook for Mechanical Engineers at §§13.4 & 13.5 (Eugene A. Avallone et al. eds., 9th ed. 1978). The degree of roughening of the pin section surface can be specified depending upon the method used to form the roughened surface. For instance, an EDM surface finish is described according to the Channilles scale. A chemical etching surface finish can be described by texture ID number or type, as provided by Mold-Tech, Inc. of Chicopee, Mass. Likewise, the textured surface made according to the mechanical process can be controlled by the grit size used in the process.
Roughening the surface 26 with the abrasive agent results in, as best seen in
The abrasive agent can be directed in a stream of gas only, liquid only, or a gas/liquid mixture. When the abrasive agent is in gas only, it may be called “sandblasting.” When the abrasive agent is in liquid, it may be called “vapor honing.” Gases and liquids that can be used during this method include, for example, air and water.
The abrasive agent can be formed of metal, alloys, minerals, sand, ceramics or any natural or synthetic abrasive material with the desired grit equivalent. For example, silicon carbide, tungsten carbide, granite, aluminum oxide, and boron carbide can be used. The present invention however is not limited to these abrasive agents. The abrasive agent is selected based on the size of the particles (i.e., grit) that can be formed by the material and the hardness of the material.
The abrasive agent preferably has a grit size greater than about 800 (i.e., a diameter of about 10 microns) and less than about 70 (i.e., a diameter of about 200 microns). More preferably, the abrasive agent has a grit size between about 70 (i.e., a diameter of about 200 microns) and about 180 (i.e., a diameter of about 75 microns). Even more preferably, the abrasive agent has a grit size between about 150 (i.e., a diameter of about 90 microns) and about 120 (i.e., a diameter of about 100 microns). Most preferably, the grit size is about 120 (i.e., a diameter of about 100 microns). One of ordinary skill in the art is aware that grit size and diameter are inversely proportional, i.e., a larger grit size will yield a lower diameter, and vice versa.
The abrasive agent is preferably directed at a pressure of between about 80 and about 120 psi. The abrasive agent is preferably directed for a time of between about 20 and about 60 seconds. The time depends on the size and shape of the abrasive agent, the hardness of the agent and the material forming the mold cavity. In a preferred embodiment, the abrasive agent is 120 grit aluminum oxide sandblasted for about 20 seconds to about 30 seconds at 100 psi using a ¼-inch nozzle diameter. The sandblasting cabinet used in the preferred embodiment is commercially available from Cyclone Blasting Systems, Inc. of Dowagiac, Mich. under the designation Cyclone Model 4826. Other commercially available sandblasting cabinets can also be used.
After the abrasive agent contacts the surface of the cavity, the surface is roughened or texturized so that the average surface roughness is between about 10 and about 200 microinches. More preferably, the average surface roughness is between about 25 and about 100 microinches, still more preferably, the average surface roughness is about 35 to about 50 microinches. The surface roughness can be determined using a variety of commercially available measuring devices, such as a profilometer or an atomic force microscope. The surface roughness should be sufficiently large to create adequate passageways to accommodate the air, however, the passageways should be small enough and shaped appropriately so that the cover material cannot enter the passageways sufficiently to prevent gases from traveling on a short path from the flow terminus to the vent surrounding the vent pin 36.
As part of step 20b, after the surface is roughened the surface must be cleaned to remove the abrasive agent and any removed mold material. This cleaning should remove these materials from the cavity surface and the pin holes. Preferably, the cleaning is done by rinsing the cavities with soap and water and hand drying the cavities.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring also to
Table I shows test results comparing different mold cavity preparations or finishes. The Ra roughness measurements were made on a Dektak 303 contact stylus profilometer, in which 20-mil traces were taken using a 12.5-μm-radius stylus under a load of 15 mg. The profilometer was calibrated using a NIST traceable height standard (MRS-3 144R5).
Comparative Example 1 is a mold formed by a hob that was turned, then polished to a finish. This mold exhibited a roughness range less than 10 of from 2.3 to 8.2. Golf balls were formed using this mold and the molded balls were inspected for knit lines. In Example 2, the cavities in the mold of Comparative Example 1 were removed from the mold and sandblasted with 120 grit aluminum oxide for between about 20 seconds and about 30 seconds at 100 psi using a ¼-inch nozzle diameter until the entire cavity surface was covered according to the present invention. The inventive mold of Example 2 exhibited a roughness range of 31.2 to 45.5. Golf balls were formed using these cavities and the molded balls were inspected for knit lines. The golf balls formed with the cavities of Comparative Example 1 exhibited 39% knit lines and the golf balls formed with the cavities of inventive Example 2 exhibited 0% knit lines under 4× magnification. Thus, the present inventive Example 2 exhibits far fewer knit lines than the prior art method of Comparative Example 1. More specifically, the knit lines were eliminated in golf balls of inventive Example 2.
Comparative Example 4 is a mold treated with a 800 grit by vapor honing. The mold of Example 4 exhibited a roughness range of 4.6 to 9.0. Golf balls were formed using these cavities and the molded balls were inspected for knit lines. In inventive Example 3, the cavities of Comparative Example 4 were removed from the mold and sandblasted with 120 grit aluminum oxide for between about 20 seconds and about 30 seconds at 100 psi using a ¼-inch nozzle diameter until the entire cavity surface was covered according to the present invention. The inventive mold of Example 3 exhibited a roughness range of 31.2 to 45.5. Golf balls were formed using these cavities and the molded balls were inspected for knit lines. The golf balls formed with the cavities of Comparative Example 4 exhibited 3% knit lines and the golf balls formed with the cavities of inventive Example 3 exhibited 0% knit lines under 4× magnification. Thus, the present inventive method of Example 3 exhibits fewer knit lines than the method of Comparative Example 4. More specifically, the knit lines were eliminated in golf balls of inventive Example 3.
With the balls of inventive Examples 3 and 4, tests related to the dimple geometry were also conducted. The dimple edge angle for balls from processes of Examples 3 and 4 are substantially the same at 16.6° and 16.7°. The dimple diameter for balls from processes of Examples 3 and 4 were substantially the same at 0.1438 inches and 0.1447 inches, respectively, and the dimple depths for balls from processes of Examples 3 and 4 were the same at 0.0107 inches each. Thus, the inventive process of Example 3 and the Comparative Example 4 did not significantly affect dimple geometry.
Not only does the present method allow improved venting without knit line formation but may also allow the same cavities to run different core sizes and cover formulations in the same mold. It also eliminates the need for manual adjustment of gate size to assure that the flow terminus meet at the vent pin locations, which in turn allows the cavities to be fabricated identically and interchanged in different mold bases and have interchanged locations in a base.
As used herein, the term “about,” used in connection with one or more numbers or numerical ranges, should be understood to refer to all such numbers, including all numbers in a range.
While it is apparent that the illustrative embodiments of the invention disclosed herein fulfill the objectives stated above, it is appreciated that numerous modifications and other embodiments may be devised by those skilled in the art. Although the inventive preparation is applied to a mold used to form an outer cover layer, the inventive preparation can be done on a mold used to form various other layers, such as an inner cover layer. Therefore, it will be understood that the appended claims are intended to cover all such modifications and embodiments which would come within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3765923 | Bender-Christensen | Oct 1973 | A |
| 3840239 | Fazekas et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
| 3982983 | Abraham et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
| 4533568 | McClinton et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4763900 | Carr | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4851913 | Fetzer et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 5318091 | Pavoni et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5827567 | Molitor | Oct 1998 | A |
| 6003724 | Collins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6033724 | Molitor | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6103166 | Boehm et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6228294 | Lee et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6235230 | Puniello | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6630225 | Sumi et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6761846 | Murphy | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20030102595 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |
